The main causes of this industrial revolution were—the application of a number of inventions and improved processes to leading industries; the incalculable advantages derived2 from steam power; the immense increase in the supplies of cotton, coal, minerals and other raw materials; the greater wealth of the nation, allowing of much more capital being available for industrial enterprises; and the improvement, not alone in inland communication, but in ship-building and the art of navigation, foreign markets being thus reached more readily at a time when the general political and economic conditions were especially favourable4 to the commercial expansion abroad which followed on our industrial expansion at home.
Woollen manufactures, originally established here with the help of workers introduced from Flanders in the time of Edward III., had had a long pre-eminence, obtaining a vested interest which led to the advent5 of a new rival, in the form of cotton manufacturers, receiving, at first, very scanty6 encouragement. Woollens had made such progress that, even before the Restoration, a market was (as Dowell tells us) opened for our goods, not only in Spain, France, Italy and Germany, but also in Russia and Baltic and other ports, while they were carried by way of Archangel into Persia, and also made a market for themselves in Turkey. {187}A great part of England was turned into sheep farms for the production of wool, and by 1700 the value of woollen goods exported had risen to £3,000,000.
At this time the import of raw cotton was only about 1? million lbs.[26] To such an extent had the woollen, and, also, the linen7, industries been placed under the "protection" of the governing powers that until 1721 it was a penal8 offence in England to weave or sell calico—that is, a fabric10 consisting entirely11 of cotton; and down to 1774 anyone who made or sold a fabric having more than half its threads of cotton was liable to prosecution12. Not until 1783 was the prohibition13 of British-made calicoes removed and the production in this country of all-cotton goods allowed by legislators who had been unduly14 solicitous15 of the welfare of British industry. When, in 1776, Adam Smith published his great work on "The Wealth of Nations," he certainly did state that Christopher Columbus had brought back from the New World some bales of cotton, and had shown them at the court of Spain; but he did not think it necessary to mention that a cotton industry had been started here, and was likely to contribute to the wealth of the United Kingdom.
The imports of raw cotton slowly increased to 2,000,000 in 1720, and to 3,000,000 lbs. in 1751. In 1764, the year in which Hargreaves introduced the spinning jenny, they were still not higher than 4,000,000 lbs. But the successive inventions, during the course of about three decades, alike of Hargreaves, Arkwright, Crompton, Cartwright and others gave such an impetus16 to the industry that by 1800 the importation of raw cotton (greatly facilitated by the further invention, in 1793, of Eli Whitney's appliance for separating cotton from the cotton seed) had risen to 52,000,000 lbs., while the value of all kinds of cotton products exported increased between 1765 and 1800 from £800,000 to £5,800,000.
This rapid progress would not, however, have been possible but for the facilities for obtaining cheap power afforded by the condensing steam-engine of James Watt17, who had taken out a patent for his invention in 1769, though it was not till 1776 that he built and sold his first engine, on which he further improved in 1781. Steam-power, of far greater force {188}and utility, and capable of being produced anywhere, thus took the place of the water-power, only available alongside streams, on which, as we have seen, the earlier success of the woollen industry, especially as carried on among the hills of Yorkshire, had been established. It was by water-power that the spinning machine so recently introduced by Sir Richard Arkwright was operated until James Watt had shown that steam could be used to better advantage. Then the setting up at Papplewick, Nottinghamshire, in 1785, of a steam-engine for the operation of cotton machinery18 marked, also, the decline of domestic manufactures and the advent of that factory system which was to bring about a complete transformation19 in the industrial conditions of the United Kingdom.
Yet just as the improvements in cotton production would have been incomplete without the steam-engine, so, also, would the invention even of the steam-engine have been of little service but for an abundant supply of coal, and but, also, for the possession of a ready and economical means of moving the coal from the localities where it was to be found to those where it was wanted for the purposes of the "steam age" that was about to open.
The greater demand for fuel and the increased facilities for supplying it led to the greater development of various inland coal-fields, in addition to those already long in operation in the Newcastle district, and having there the advantages of river and sea as an aid to distribution. The need, also, of coal for the operation of the steam-engine in the countless20 number of new industries or new works that followed on James Watt's improvements had an important influence on fixing the location of fresh industrial centres.
Coal-mining, again, was powerfully accelerated in the same period by the iron industry, which itself was undergoing developments no less remarkable22 than those attending the expansion of the cotton industries, and having no less a bearing on the problem of efficient inland transport.
Down to the year 1740 the smelting23 of iron-ores—an industry carried on here from very early days in our history—was done entirely with wood charcoal24. For this reason the early seat of the iron industry was in the forests that, as already told, once covered so large an area in Sussex, Kent {189}and Surrey, and afforded what may, at one time, have appeared to be a practically limitless supply of fuel.
The three counties in question thus attained25 to a high degree of industrial importance and prosperity at a time when Lancashire and Yorkshire were still regarded by dwellers26 in the south as inhabited by a scarcely civilised people. Lord Seymour, who was made by Henry VIII. Lord High Admiral of England, and ended his life on the scaffold in 1549, was the owner of iron-works in Sussex. The cannon27 and shot which Drake, Hawkins and Frobisher took with them on their ships were supplied by these southern foundries. Of the position of the industry in 1653, when there were 42 forges and 27 furnaces in the Weald of Sussex, the author of "Glimpses of our Ancestors in Sussex" says: "Sussex was then the Wales and the Warwickshire of England. Foreign countries sought eagerly for its cannon, its culverines and falconets.... Its richly decorated fire-backs and fantastic andirons were the pride of lordly mansions28. London sent here for the railings that went round its great cathedral; Sussex ploughshares, speeds and other agricultural implements29 and hardware were sent all over the kingdom."
Fears, however, had already been excited in Henry VIII.'s day that the continued destruction of forests, in order to supply the iron-works with fuel, would lead to a timber famine; and in Queen Elizabeth's reign3 such a prospect30, foreshadowing a shortage of timber for shipbuilding purposes at the very time when a conflict with Spain was regarded as inevitable31, was looked upon as involving a possible national disaster. A subsidiary complaint against the industry was that the traffic to and from the iron-works injured the roads. Legislation was therefore passed prohibiting, under severe penalties, any increase in the number of iron-works in the three counties mentioned, except on land already occupied or able to furnish of itself a sufficient supply of timber. Exportation of iron was also prohibited, and it was even considered good policy to import iron, rather than to make it, and so preserve the still available timber for other purposes.
By the early part of the eighteenth century the iron industry, after exhausting the timber supplies of Sussex, had disappeared from that county; but it flourished in Shropshire, where it found both fuel and iron-stone in the Forest {190}of Dean, while the Severn provided water-power and inland navigation. The industry was also carried on in Staffordshire; and here, in the reign of James I., some important experiments were made in the direction of using coal instead of wood in the manufacture of iron; but this idea was not fully21 developed until Abraham Darby had shown, in 1735, how coke, in combination with a powerful blast, could be substituted for wood. What is regarded as the real turning-point in the iron industry followed in 1760, when Dr Roebuck built, at the Carron works, his new type of blast furnace, in which coke was to be used.
An impetus was thus given to the industry, and an impetus it certainly needed, inasmuch as the production of iron in the United Kingdom had sunk in 1740 to 17,350 tons. Then, in 1783, Henry Cort, of Gosport, patented his process for converting pig-iron into malleable32 iron through the operation of "puddling" in a common air-furnace consuming coal, and in 1784 he patented a further process for turning malleable iron into bars by means of rollers instead of forge hammers.
These further inventions were of much service; but the greatest advance of all followed on the application of steam to iron-making, as one of the many results of James Watt's achievements. Steam enabled the manufacturers to get a far more powerful blast in the new furnaces, at a consumption of about one-third less of coal, than had been possible in the process of smelting carried on with the help of water-power. The use, also, of coal instead of timber for fuel, and of steam-power in place of water-power, made the iron-masters independent both of the forests and of the rivers of southern England, and led to the further expansion of the iron industry being transferred to such districts as Staffordshire, the north-east coast, Scotland and South Wales, where the now all-important coal could be obtained no less readily than the iron-ore.
So the migration33 of some of the greatest of our national industries from south to north, begun by the streams on Yorkshire hills, was completed by the steam-engine of James Watt.
The effect on the iron industry itself of the improvements in manufacture was prodigious34. The 17,350 tons of iron which were alone produced in 1740 came from 59 furnaces, {191}using charcoal only. In 1788 the number of furnaces had increased to 85, and the output to 68,300 tons, of which 55,200 tons had been produced by coke, and only 13,100 tons by charcoal. In 1796, when the charcoal process had been almost entirely given up, the number of furnaces was 121 (in England and Wales 104; in Scotland 17), and the production was 124,879 tons. In this same year Pitt proposed to put a tax on coal, and the following year he sought to impose one on pig-iron; but a taxing of raw material was not to be tolerated, and he had to abandon each project.
Adding to these details corresponding figures for other years in the Canal Era, we get the following table:—
Iron Furnaces and Production in England,
Wales and Scotland.
Year. Number of furnaces. Production (tons).
1740 59 17,350
1788 85 68,300
1796 121 124,879
1802 168 170,000
1806 227 250,000
1820 260 400,000
1825 374 581,367
This great increase in the output of iron meant, also, a considerable expansion in the engineering trades of the country in general, in the hardware trades of Birmingham, in the cutlery trade of Sheffield, and in many other trades besides. It led to the opening up of new centres of activity and industry in addition to a greater aggregation35 of workers in centres already established; while the combined effect on the coal industry itself of all these developments is well shown by the following figures, giving the output of coal in the United Kingdom, for the years mentioned, as estimated by the Commissioners36 of 1871:—
YEAR. TONS.
1700 2,612,000
1750 4,773,828
1770 6,205,400
1790 7,618,728
1795 10,080,300
{192}
The rapid expansion in the last half of the eighteenth century of the various industries here mentioned, and of many others besides, led to a corresponding growth in the industrial towns; and this, in turn, meant an increase in the wants of the community, and the opening up of new and even huge markets for agricultural produce. Such produce, also, was now obtainable in greater quantity owing to the fact that more land was being brought under cultivation37. In 1685 it had been estimated that there were in England about 18,000,000 acres of fen9, forest and moorland. Of this total 3,000,000 acres had been brought under cultivation before 1727. But from that time many enclosure Acts were passed, no fewer than 138 becoming law between 1789 and 1792; and, though it by no means follows that all the land so enclosed was actually cultivated, the greater opportunities opening out to agriculture when more and more workers were being collected into factories and manufacturing districts, and becoming more and more dependent on others for food supplies which, under the old conditions of life and industry, people grew for themselves, were beyond all question, while agricultural production was itself advanced by the supply of those better and cheaper aids to husbandry which followed on the improvements in iron manufacture.
To meet the enormously increased demands for the transport alike of raw materials, of manufactured articles and of domestic supplies in the period of industrial revolution which thus began to develop about the middle of the eighteenth century, something more was wanted than rivers, offering uncertain navigation, and only available in particular districts, and highways deplorably bad in spite of Turnpike Acts and much wasteful38 expenditure39, another half-century having still to elapse before Telford showed the country how roads should be made, and McAdam told how they should be mended.
In these circumstances, and during the period here in question, it was canals that were mainly looked to as a means of supplying the transport requirements then growing at so prodigious a rate. Invention and production had already far surpassed the means of efficient distribution. England was on the eve of the greatest industrial expansion of any country in Europe; but she was starting thereon with probably the worst means of inland transport of any country in {193}Europe. Canals appeared to be the one thing needed; and every fresh canal constructed was heralded40 with joy because it foreshadowed, among other things, better trade, more employment, higher wages, cheaper fuel and provisions, and less of the isolation41 from which many a land-locked community was suffering.
Some of the accounts given by Phillips, in his "General History of Inland Navigation," of the opening of various canals afford interesting evidence of the satisfaction with which the populace greeted the new waterways. I give a few examples:—
"1798.—The Herefordshire and Gloucestershire canal from Gloucester to Ledbury is completed; the opening of this navigation took place on the 30th of March, when several of the proprietors42 and gentlemen of the committee embarked43 ... in the first vessel44 freighted with merchandise consigned45 to Ledbury, which was followed by three others laden46 with coal. They passed through the tunnel at Oxenhall, which is 2192 yards in length, in the space of 52 minutes.... Both ends of the tunnel, as well as the banks of the canal, were lined with spectators, who hailed the boats with reiterated47 acclamations. It is supposed that upwards48 of 2000 persons were present on their arrival at Ledbury.... The advantages which must result from this inland navigation to Ledbury and the adjoining country are incalculable. In the article of coal the inhabitants of this district will reap an important benefit by the immediate49 reduction in price of at least 10s. per ton. Coals of the first quality are now delivered at the wharf50, close to Ledbury, at 13s. 6d., whereas the former price was 24s. per ton."
"1799.—The new canal from Sowerby-bridge to Rochdale was lately opened for business. The Travis yacht first crossed the head level, decorated with the union flag, emblematical51 of the junction52 of the ports of Hull53 and Liverpool, with colours flying, music playing, attended by the Saville yacht, and thousands of spectators; a display of flags on the warehouses54, and sound of cannon, announced to the rejoicing neighbourhood the joyful55 tidings, which in the evening were realised by the arrival of several vessels56, laden with corn and timber."
"1800.—The Peak Forest canal ... was opened on the {194}1st of May. The completion of this bold and difficult undertaking57, through numerous hills and valleys, precipices58 and declivities, is an object of general admiration59."
Yet in these same records—published in 1803—and among his accounts of the crowds, the flags, the music and the cannon that had then so recently welcomed the opening of still more canals, Phillips tells of an innovation destined60 eventually to supplant61 the canal system by reason of advantages which he himself seems to have recognised, though he naturally did not then anticipate all that was to follow. The said innovation is thus recorded by him under date "1802":—
"The locks, canal and basin, from which the Surrey iron rail-way now in agitation62, is to commence at Wandsworth, have been lately opened and the water admitted from the Thames. The first barge63 entered the lock amidst a vast number of spectators, who rejoiced at the completion of this part of the important and useful work. The ground is laid out for the rail-way, with some few intervals64, all the way to Croydon; and the undertakers are ready to lay down the iron; it is expected to be ready by midsummer.
"N.B. The iron rail-ways are of great advantage to the country in general, and are made at an expense of about 300l. per mile. The advantage they give for the conveyance65 of goods by carts and waggons66, seems even to surpass, in some instances, those of boat carriage by canals."
So we come to the story of the railway, which had, however, been undergoing development, from very primitive67 conditions, for a considerable period even prior to this notable event on the banks of the Thames in 1802.
点击收听单词发音
1 inadequate | |
adj.(for,to)不充足的,不适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 advent | |
n.(重要事件等的)到来,来临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 scanty | |
adj.缺乏的,仅有的,节省的,狭小的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 linen | |
n.亚麻布,亚麻线,亚麻制品;adj.亚麻布制的,亚麻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 penal | |
adj.刑罚的;刑法上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fen | |
n.沼泽,沼池 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 fabric | |
n.织物,织品,布;构造,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 unduly | |
adv.过度地,不适当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 solicitous | |
adj.热切的,挂念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 impetus | |
n.推动,促进,刺激;推动力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 watt | |
n.瓦,瓦特 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 smelting | |
n.熔炼v.熔炼,提炼(矿石)( smelt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 charcoal | |
n.炭,木炭,生物炭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 dwellers | |
n.居民,居住者( dweller的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 cannon | |
n.大炮,火炮;飞机上的机关炮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 mansions | |
n.宅第,公馆,大厦( mansion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 implements | |
n.工具( implement的名词复数 );家具;手段;[法律]履行(契约等)v.实现( implement的第三人称单数 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 malleable | |
adj.(金属)可锻的;有延展性的;(性格)可训练的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 migration | |
n.迁移,移居,(鸟类等的)迁徙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 prodigious | |
adj.惊人的,奇妙的;异常的;巨大的;庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 aggregation | |
n.聚合,组合;凝聚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 commissioners | |
n.专员( commissioner的名词复数 );长官;委员;政府部门的长官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 cultivation | |
n.耕作,培养,栽培(法),养成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 wasteful | |
adj.(造成)浪费的,挥霍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 expenditure | |
n.(时间、劳力、金钱等)支出;使用,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 heralded | |
v.预示( herald的过去式和过去分词 );宣布(好或重要) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 isolation | |
n.隔离,孤立,分解,分离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 proprietors | |
n.所有人,业主( proprietor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 embarked | |
乘船( embark的过去式和过去分词 ); 装载; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 consigned | |
v.把…置于(令人不快的境地)( consign的过去式和过去分词 );把…托付给;把…托人代售;丟弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 laden | |
adj.装满了的;充满了的;负了重担的;苦恼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 upwards | |
adv.向上,在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 wharf | |
n.码头,停泊处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 emblematical | |
adj.标志的,象征的,典型的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 junction | |
n.连接,接合;交叉点,接合处,枢纽站 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 hull | |
n.船身;(果、实等的)外壳;vt.去(谷物等)壳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 warehouses | |
仓库,货栈( warehouse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 joyful | |
adj.欢乐的,令人欢欣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 vessels | |
n.血管( vessel的名词复数 );船;容器;(具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的)人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 undertaking | |
n.保证,许诺,事业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 precipices | |
n.悬崖,峭壁( precipice的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 supplant | |
vt.排挤;取代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 agitation | |
n.搅动;搅拌;鼓动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 barge | |
n.平底载货船,驳船 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 intervals | |
n.[军事]间隔( interval的名词复数 );间隔时间;[数学]区间;(戏剧、电影或音乐会的)幕间休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 conveyance | |
n.(不动产等的)转让,让与;转让证书;传送;运送;表达;(正)运输工具 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 waggons | |
四轮的运货马车( waggon的名词复数 ); 铁路货车; 小手推车 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |