The word rhythm is here used to signify the power possessed2 by lines, tones, and colours, by their ordering and arrangement, to affect us, somewhat as different notes and combinations of sound do in music. And just as in music, where sounds affect us without having any direct relation with nature, but appeal directly to our own inner life; so in painting, sculpture, and architecture there is a music that appeals directly to us apart from any significance that may be associated with the representation of natural phenomena3. There is, as it were, an abstract music of line, tone, and colour.
The danger of the naturalistic movement in painting in the nineteenth century has been that it has turned our attention away from this fundamental fact of art to the contemplation of interesting 128realisations of appearances—realisations often full of poetic4 suggestiveness due to associations connected with the objects painted as concrete things, but not always made directly significant as artistic5 expression; whereas it is the business of the artist to relate the form, colour, and tone of natural appearances to this abstract musical quality, with which he should never lose touch even in the most highly realised detail of his work. For only thus, when related to rhythm, do the form, tone, and colour of appearances obtain their full expressive6 power and become a means of vitally conveying the feeling of the artist.
Inquiry7 as to the origin of this power and of rhythm generally is a profoundly interesting subject; and now that recent advances in science tend to show that sound, heat, light, and possibly electricity and even nerve force are but different rhythmic8 forms of energy, and that matter itself may possibly be resolved eventually into different rhythmic motions, it does look as if rhythm may yet be found to contain even the secret of life itself. At any rate it is very intimately associated with life; and primitive9 man early began to give expression in some form of architecture, sculpture, or painting to the deeper feelings that were moving him; found some correspondence between the lines and colours of architecture, sculpture, and painting and the emotional life that was awakening10 within him. Thus, looking back at the remains11 of their work that have come down to us, we are enabled to judge of the nature of the people from the expression we find in hewn stone and on painted walls.
It is in primitive art generally that we see more clearly the direct emotional significance of line and 129form. Art appears to have developed from its most abstract position, to which bit by bit have been added the truths and graces of natural appearance, until as much of this naturalistic truth has been added as the abstract significance at the base of the expression could stand without loss of power. At this point, as has already been explained, a school is at the height of its development. The work after this usually shows an increased concern with naturalistic truth, which is always very popular, to the gradual exclusion12 of the backbone13 of abstract line and form significance that dominated the earlier work. And when these primitive conditions are lost touch with, a decadence14 sets in. At least, this is roughly the theory to which a study of the two great art developments of the past, in Greece and Italy, would seem to point. And this theory is the excuse for all the attempts at primitivism of which we have lately seen so much.
Art having lost touch with its primitive base owing to the over-doses of naturalism it has had, we must, these new apostles say, find a new primitive base on which to build the new structure of art. The theory has its attractions, but there is this difference between the primitive archaic15 Greek or early Italian and the modern primitive; the early men reverently16 clothed the abstract idea they started with in the most natural and beautiful form within their knowledge, ever seeking to discover new truths and graces from nature to enrich their work; while the modern artist, with the art treasures of all periods of the world before him, can never be in the position of these simple-minded men. It is therefore unlikely that the future development of art will be on lines similar to that of the past. 130The same conditions of simple ignorance are never likely to occur again. Means of communication and prolific17 reproduction make it very unlikely that the art of the world will again be lost for a season, as was Greek art in the Middle Ages. Interesting intellectually as is the theory that the impressionist point of view (the accepting of the flat retina picture as a pattern of colour sensations) offers a new field from which to select material for a new basis of artistic expression, so far the evidence of results has not shown anything likely seriously to threaten the established principles of traditional design. And anything more different in spirit from the genuine primitive than the irreverent anarchy18 and flouting19 of all refinement20 in the work of some of these new primitives21, it would be difficult to imagine. But much of the work of the movement has undoubted artistic vitality22, and in its insistence23 on design and selection should do much to kill "realism" and the "copying nature" theory of a few years back.
Although it is perfectly24 true that the feelings and ideas that impel25 the artist may sooner or later find their own expression, there are a great many principles connected with the arranging of lines, tones, and colours in his picture that it is difficult to transgress26 without calamity27. At any rate the knowledge of some of them will aid the artist in gaining experience, and possibly save him some needless fumbling28.
But don't for one moment think that anything in the nature of rules is going to take the place of the initial artistic impulse which must come from within. This is not a matter for teaching, art training being only concerned with perfecting the means of its expression.
Plate XXX. A STUDY FOR A PICTURE OF "ROSALIND AND ORLANDO" Ros. "He calls us back; my pride fell with my fortunes."
Plate XXX.
A STUDY FOR A PICTURE OF "ROSALIND AND ORLANDO"
Ros. "He calls us back; my pride fell with my fortunes."
131
It is proposed to treat the subject from the material side of line and tone only, without any reference to subject matter, with the idea of trying to find out something about the expressive qualities line and tone are capable of yielding unassociated with visual things. What use can be made of any such knowledge to give expression to the emotional life of the artist is not our concern, and is obviously a matter for the individual to decide for himself.
There is at the basis of every picture a structure of lines and masses. They may not be very obvious, and may be hidden under the most broken of techniques, but they will always be found underlying29 the planning of any painting. Some may say that the lines are only the boundaries of the masses, and others that the masses are only the spaces between the lines. But whichever way you care to look at it, there are particular emotional qualities analogous30 to music that affect us in lines and line arrangements and also in tone or mass arrangements. And any power a picture may have to move us will be largely due to the rhythmic significance of this original planning. These qualities, as has already been stated, affect us quite apart from any association they may have with natural things: arrangements of mere31 geometrical lines are sufficient to suggest them. But of course other associations connected with the objects represented will largely augment32 the impression, when the line and tone arrangements and the sentiment of the object are in sympathy. And if they are not, it may happen that associations connected with the representation will cut in and obscure or entirely33 destroy this line and tone music. That is to say, 132if the line and tone arrangement in the abstract is expressive of the sublime34, and the objects whose representation they support something ridiculous, say a donkey braying35, the associations aroused by so ridiculous an appearance will override36 those connected with the line and tone arrangement. But it is remarkable37 how seldom this occurs in nature, the sentiment of the line and tone arrangements things present being usually in harmony with the sentiment of the object itself. As a matter of fact, the line effect of a donkey in repose39 is much more sublime than when he is braying.
Unity40 and Variety.
There are two qualities that may be allowed to divide the consideration of this subject, two points of view from which the subject can be approached: Unity and Variety, qualities somewhat opposed to each other, as are harmony and contrast in the realm of colour. Unity is concerned with the relationship of all the parts to that oneness of conception that should control every detail of a work of art. All the more profound qualities, the deeper emotional notes, are on this side of the subject. On the other hand, variety holds the secrets of charm, vitality, and the picturesque41, it is the "dither," the play between the larger parts, that makes for life and character. Without variety there can be no life.
In any conception of a perfect unity, like the perfected life of the Buddhist42, Nirvana or Nibbana (literally "dying out" or "extinction43" as of an expiring fire), there is no room for variety, for the play of life; all such fretfulness ceases, to be replaced by an all-pervading calm, beautiful, if you like, but lifeless. There is this deadness about any conception of perfection that will always make it an unattainable 133 ideal in life. Those who, like the Indian fakir or the hermits44 of the Middle Ages, have staked their all on this ideal of perfection, have found it necessary to suppress life in every way possible, the fakirs often remaining motionless for long periods at a time, and one of the mediaeval saints going so far as to live on the top of a high column where life and movement were well-nigh impossible.
And in art it is the same; all those who have aimed at an absolute perfection have usually ended in a deadness. The Greeks knew better than many of their imitators this vital necessity in art. In their most ideal work there is always that variety that gives character and life. No formula or canon of proportions or other mechanical device for the attainment45 of perfection was allowed by this vital people entirely to subdue46 their love of life and variety. And however near they might go towards a perfect type in their ideal heads and figures, they never went so far as to kill the individual in the type. It is the lack of this subtle distinction that, I think, has been the cause of the failure of so much art founded on so-called Greek ideals. Much Roman sculpture, if you except their portrait busts47, illustrates48 this. Compared with Greek work it lacks that subtle variety in the modelling that gives vitality. The difference can be felt instinctively49 in the merest fragment of a broken figure. It is not difficult to tell Greek from Roman fragments, they pulsate50 with a life that it is impossible to describe but that one instinctively feels. And this vitality depends, I think it will be found, on the greater amount of life-giving variety in the surfaces of the modelling. In their architectural mouldings, the difference of which we are speaking can be more easily traced. 134The vivacity51 and brilliancy of a Greek moulding makes a Roman work look heavy and dull. And it will generally be found that the Romans used the curve of the circle in the sections of their mouldings, a curve possessing the least amount of variety, as is explained later, where the Greeks used the lines of conic sections, curves possessed of the greatest amount of variety.
But while unity must never exist without this life-giving variety, variety must always be under the moral control of unity, or it will get out of hand and become extravagant52. In fact, the most perfect work, like the most perfect engine of which we spoke53 in a former chapter, has the least amount of variety, as the engine has the least amount of "dither," that is compatible with life. One does not hear so much talk in these days about a perfect type as was the fashion at one time; and certainly the pursuit of this ideal by a process of selecting the best features from many models and constructing a figure out of them as an ideal type, was productive of very dead and lifeless work. No account was taken of the variety from a common type necessary in the most perfect work, if life and individual interest are not to be lost, and the thing is not to become a dead abstraction. But the danger is rather the other way at the moment. Artists revel54 in the oddest of individual forms, and the type idea is flouted55 on all hands. An anarchy of individualism is upon us, and the vitality of disordered variety is more fashionable than the calm beauty of an ordered unity.
Excess of variations from a common type is what I think we recognise as ugliness in the objective world, whereas beauty is on the side of unity and conformity56 to type. Beauty possesses both 135variety and unity, and is never extreme, erring57 rather on the side of unity.
Burke in his essay on "The Sublime and the Beautiful" would seem to use the word beautiful where we should use the word pretty, placing it at the opposite pole from the sublime, whereas I think beauty always has some elements of the sublime in it, while the merely pretty has not. Mere prettiness is a little difficult to place, it does not come between either of our extremes, possessing little character or type, variety or unity. It is perhaps charm without either of these strengthening associates, and in consequence is always feeble, and the favourite diet of weak artistic digestions58.
The sculpture of ancient Egypt is an instance of great unity in conception, and the suppression of variety to a point at which life scarcely exists. The lines of the Egyptian figures are simple and long, the surfaces smooth and unvaried, no action is allowed to give variety to the pose, the placing of one foot a little in front of the other being alone permitted in the standing59 figures; the arms, when not hanging straight down the sides, are flexed60 stiffly at the elbow at right angles; the heads stare straight before them. The expression of sublimity61 is complete, and this was, of course, what was aimed at. But how cold and terrible is the lack of that play and variety that alone show life. What a relief it is, at the British Museum, to go into the Elgin Marble room and be warmed by the noble life pulsating62 in the Greek work, after visiting the cold Egyptian rooms.
In what we call a perfect face it is not so much the perfect regularity63 of shape and balance in the features that charms us, not the things that belong to an ideal type, but rather the subtle variations 136from this type that are individual to the particular head we are admiring. A perfect type of head, if such could exist, might excite our wonder, but would leave us cold. But it can never exist in life; the slightest movement of the features, which must always accompany life and expression, will mar38 it. And the influence of these habitual64 movements on the form of the features themselves will invariably mould them into individual shapes away from the so-called perfect type, whatever may have been nature's intention in the first instance.
If we call these variations from a common type in the features imperfections, as it is usual to do, it would seem to be the imperfections of perfection that charm and stir us; and that perfection without these so-called imperfections is a cold, dead abstraction, devoid65 of life: that unity without variety is lifeless and incapable66 of touching67 us.
On the other hand, variety without unity to govern it is a riotous68 exuberance69 of life, lacking all power and restraint and wasting itself in a madness of excess.
So that in art a balance has to be struck between these two opposing qualities. In good work unity is the dominating quality, all the variety being done in conformity to some large idea of the whole, which is never lost sight of, even in the smallest detail of the work. Good style in art has been defined as "variety in unity," and Hogarth's definition of composition as the art of "varying well" is similar. And I am not sure that "contrasts in harmony" would not be a suggestive definition of good colour.
Let us consider first variety and unity as they are related to line drawing, and afterwards to mass drawing.
点击收听单词发音
1 stimulus | |
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 poetic | |
adj.富有诗意的,有诗人气质的,善于抒情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 expressive | |
adj.表现的,表达…的,富于表情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 rhythmic | |
adj.有节奏的,有韵律的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 awakening | |
n.觉醒,醒悟 adj.觉醒中的;唤醒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 exclusion | |
n.拒绝,排除,排斥,远足,远途旅行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 backbone | |
n.脊骨,脊柱,骨干;刚毅,骨气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 decadence | |
n.衰落,颓废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 archaic | |
adj.(语言、词汇等)古代的,已不通用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 reverently | |
adv.虔诚地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 prolific | |
adj.丰富的,大量的;多产的,富有创造力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 flouting | |
v.藐视,轻视( flout的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 refinement | |
n.文雅;高尚;精美;精制;精炼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 primitives | |
原始人(primitive的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 vitality | |
n.活力,生命力,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 insistence | |
n.坚持;强调;坚决主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 impel | |
v.推动;激励,迫使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 transgress | |
vt.违反,逾越 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 calamity | |
n.灾害,祸患,不幸事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 fumbling | |
n. 摸索,漏接 v. 摸索,摸弄,笨拙的处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 analogous | |
adj.相似的;类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 augment | |
vt.(使)增大,增加,增长,扩张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 braying | |
v.发出驴叫似的声音( bray的现在分词 );发嘟嘟声;粗声粗气地讲话(或大笑);猛击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 mar | |
vt.破坏,毁坏,弄糟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 unity | |
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 picturesque | |
adj.美丽如画的,(语言)生动的,绘声绘色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 Buddhist | |
adj./n.佛教的,佛教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 hermits | |
(尤指早期基督教的)隐居修道士,隐士,遁世者( hermit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 attainment | |
n.达到,到达;[常pl.]成就,造诣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 subdue | |
vt.制服,使顺从,征服;抑制,克制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 busts | |
半身雕塑像( bust的名词复数 ); 妇女的胸部; 胸围; 突击搜捕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 illustrates | |
给…加插图( illustrate的第三人称单数 ); 说明; 表明; (用示例、图画等)说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 pulsate | |
v.有规律的跳动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 vivacity | |
n.快活,活泼,精神充沛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 revel | |
vi.狂欢作乐,陶醉;n.作乐,狂欢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 flouted | |
v.藐视,轻视( flout的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 erring | |
做错事的,错误的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 digestions | |
n.消化能力( digestion的名词复数 );消化,领悟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 flexed | |
adj.[医]曲折的,屈曲v.屈曲( flex的过去式和过去分词 );弯曲;(为准备大干而)显示实力;摩拳擦掌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 sublimity | |
崇高,庄严,气质高尚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 pulsating | |
adj.搏动的,脉冲的v.有节奏地舒张及收缩( pulsate的现在分词 );跳动;脉动;受(激情)震动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 habitual | |
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 devoid | |
adj.全无的,缺乏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 riotous | |
adj.骚乱的;狂欢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 exuberance | |
n.丰富;繁荣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |