It occurred to me that when we read of hunters, or perhaps have followed a trapper in his rounds, we have been led to think that footprints are animal autography that the initiated3 can read without hesitation4. To distinguish the track of a rabbit from that of a raccoon is readily done, and we can go much further, and determine whether the animal was walking or running, made a leap here or squatted5 there; but can we go to any length, and decipher every impress an animal may have made in passing over the sand or mud? I think not. I have seen a twig6 sent spinning a long distance up the beach at low tide, making a line of equidistant marks that were extremely life-like in appearance. A cloud of dead leaves have so dotted an expanse of mud that a gunner insisted there had been a flock of plover8 there a few moments before he arrived. All depends, or very much does, on the condition of the surface marked. If very soft and yielding, the plainest bird-tracks may be distorted, and a mere9 dot, on the other hand, may have its outline so broken as to appear as though made 189by a bird or mammal. Still, tracks are a safe guide in the long run, and, whether our opinion as to them be correct or not, the rambler finds something worth seeing, and he goes on anything but a wild-goose chase who sometimes finds himself mistaken. It is well to check our confidence occasionally and realize the limits of our power.
Opportunity afforded while in camp, and I made a short study of footprints. With a field-glass I noted10 many birds, and then going to the spot, examined the impressions their feet had made. A night-heron did not come down flatly upon its feet with outspread toes, and so the tracks were quite different from the impressions made when the bird walked. Crows, I noticed, both hopped11 and walked, and the marks were very different, the former being broad and ill-defined in comparison with the traces of the same bird’s stately tread. Had the bird not been seen, any one would have supposed two creatures had been keeping close company, or that some one individual had passed by in the very path of another. The purple grakle and red-winged blackbird made tracks too much alike to be distinguished12, yet these 190birds have not the same size or shape of foot. A water-snake came up over the mud and left a line of marks upon the sand that could not be recognized as that of any animal, except it might be a faint resemblance to the trail of a mussel. I chased a dozen crayfish over a mud flat, and their backward and sidewise leapings caused an old gunner to say there had been plover about. A blue-winged teal made a long double line of dents13 in the sand before it rose clear of the beach, and these were very like many a footprint I had previously15 seen. What, then, must we think of the fossil footprints of which so much has been written? As different species, a long series of these impressions in the rock have been described and given high-sounding titles. I am not entitled to an opinion, but have doubts, nevertheless, of the wisdom of considering every slightly different form as made by a different creature. I have given my reasons, and will only add another instance, one of greater significance than all as bearing upon the question. I startled a slumbering16 jumping-mouse last summer and it bounded across the smooth sand bared by the outgoing tide. Its track then was one made 191by its body rather than the extremities17, and a curious dent14 in the river-shore’s smooth surface it was; but before taking again to the woods it walked in its peculiar18 way, and the little footprints were quite distinct and unmistakably those of a small mammal. Had the two sets of markings been preserved in a slab19 of sandstone, no ichnologist would have recognized the truth, but probably would have said, “Here is a case where some leaping creature has overtaken a small rodent20 and devoured21 it.”
Difficult as fossil footprints may be to decipher, they call up with wonderful distinctness the long ago of other geologic22 ages. It is hard to realize that the stone of which our houses are built once formed the tide-washed shore of a primeval river or the bed of a lake or ocean gone long before man came upon the scene.
But the footprints of to-day concern me more. Looking over the side of the boat, I saw several mussels moving slowly along and making a deep, crooked23 groove24 in the ripple-marked sand, “streaking the ground with sinuous25 trace,” as Milton puts it; and the school of blunt-headed minnows made little 192dents in the sand wherever the water was shallow, when they turned suddenly and darted26 off-shore. This sand seemed very unstable27, and a little agitation28 of the water caused many a mark to be wiped out; and yet we find great slabs29 of ripple-marked and foot-marked sandstone. I picked up such a piece not long ago on which were rain-drop marks. This is the story of a million years ago; but who ever found Indian moccasin-marks not two centuries old? The footprints that could tell us many a wonderful story are all gone and the tale of a rain-drop remains30. This is a bit aggravating31. Here where we have pitched our camp, or very near it, was a Swedish village in 1650 and later, and for two days I have been hunting for evidence of the fact,—some bit of broken crockery, rusty32 nail, glass, pewter spoon, anything,—but in vain. History records the village, and correctly, without a doubt, but there are no footprints here, nor other trace to show that a white man ever saw the place until our tent was pitched upon the beach.
Towards evening I had occasion to renew my youth,—in other words, “run on an errand,” as my mother put it,—and going half 193a mile through the woods, I came to a narrow but well-worn path. This was so akin7 to my footprint thoughts of the morning that I gladly followed it instead of making a short cut. It was fortunate, for the path led directly to where I wished to go, and our theoretical geography, as usual, was terribly out of joint33. As it was, on the edge of an old village I found a very old man in a very old house. His memory as to the earlier half of the century was excellent, and he gave me the desired information and more. I spoke34 of the path through the woods, and he chuckled35 to himself.
“Through the woodses, eh? Well, when I made the path, goin’ and comin’ through the brush that wasn’t shoulder-high, there was no trees then. That was more’n forty years ago.”
"No, John, ’twa’n’t," piped a weak voice from the interior of the little cottage; “’twa’n’t mor’n——”
"Laws, man, don’t mind her. She disputes the almanac, and every winter gets in New Year’s ahead of Christmas."
I did not stop to argue the matter, but hurried campward, glad that, if I could find 194no footprints of human interest and historic, I at least had followed a path made forty years ago,—a path that had been worn among bushes and now led through a forest. It was indeed suggestive. By the camp-fire that night I vowed36 to plant a forest where now there was but a thicket37, and in my dreams I walked through a noble wood.
Think how much might be done to beautify the world, and how little is accomplished38.
点击收听单词发音
1 parley | |
n.谈判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 meditations | |
默想( meditation的名词复数 ); 默念; 沉思; 冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 initiated | |
n. 创始人 adj. 新加入的 vt. 开始,创始,启蒙,介绍加入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 hesitation | |
n.犹豫,踌躇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 squatted | |
v.像动物一样蹲下( squat的过去式和过去分词 );非法擅自占用(土地或房屋);为获得其所有权;而占用某片公共用地。 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 twig | |
n.小树枝,嫩枝;v.理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 plover | |
n.珩,珩科鸟,千鸟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 hopped | |
跳上[下]( hop的过去式和过去分词 ); 单足蹦跳; 齐足(或双足)跳行; 摘葎草花 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 dents | |
n.花边边饰;凹痕( dent的名词复数 );凹部;减少;削弱v.使产生凹痕( dent的第三人称单数 );损害;伤害;挫伤(信心、名誉等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 dent | |
n.凹痕,凹坑;初步进展 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 slumbering | |
微睡,睡眠(slumber的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 extremities | |
n.端点( extremity的名词复数 );尽头;手和足;极窘迫的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 slab | |
n.平板,厚的切片;v.切成厚板,以平板盖上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 rodent | |
n.啮齿动物;adj.啮齿目的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 devoured | |
吞没( devour的过去式和过去分词 ); 耗尽; 津津有味地看; 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 geologic | |
adj.地质的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 crooked | |
adj.弯曲的;不诚实的,狡猾的,不正当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 groove | |
n.沟,槽;凹线,(刻出的)线条,习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 sinuous | |
adj.蜿蜒的,迂回的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 darted | |
v.投掷,投射( dart的过去式和过去分词 );向前冲,飞奔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 unstable | |
adj.不稳定的,易变的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 agitation | |
n.搅动;搅拌;鼓动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 slabs | |
n.厚板,平板,厚片( slab的名词复数 );厚胶片 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 aggravating | |
adj.恼人的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 rusty | |
adj.生锈的;锈色的;荒废了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 chuckled | |
轻声地笑( chuckle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 vowed | |
起誓,发誓(vow的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 thicket | |
n.灌木丛,树林 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |