It is now necessary for us to touch on some aspects of Mohammedanism in Yezd with which it was impossible to deal fully2 while sketching3 the essential system. In the last chapter we were primarily dealing4 with the religious ideas that had been brought to bear upon the country as influences, but in this chapter we shall speak rather more of their results. First of all, I should like to give two stories. I give the two, because one is the account of a conversation which I had with a man who was not an orthodox Shiah; and, although I fancy I have heard similar remarks made by men whose orthodoxy was unimpeachable5, it is well to be on the safe side. I had been[116] challenged to give my reasons for preferring Christianity to Mohammedanism, and in reply I gave an account of a conversation I had had with another Mohammedan only a day or two before. I had been trying to show him that lying was a sin, and he had replied to me: “It’s all very well for Ferangis to say that; but the fact is that they can’t tell lies, and we can.” I quoted this story simply as bringing out very forcibly a common Persian idea, for Persians trust Ferangis implicitly7, not because they respect them, but because they believe they have a constitutional difficulty in telling lies. Having quoted it, I went on to say that as we all acknowledged in theory that truth-telling was right, it was reasonable to infer that a religion which had produced a mental constitution supposed to be incapable8 of falsehood, was better than a religion which had produced the exact contrary. The answer of the Mohammedan was that truth-speaking and honesty had nothing to do with religion, but were purely9 a matter of climate. “In that case,” I said, “the people of Persia ought to speak the truth very well, for one of the Greek historians who lived before the Mohammedan era declared that the Persians were[117] famous for speaking the truth.” “But who does not know,” said the Mohammedan, “that the climate of a country changes entirely10 every two thousand years?”
At another time a Mohammedan of undoubted orthodoxy was answering a similar position, only he was trying to explain away not only the difference in honesty, but also in other matters. He said: “These facts cannot be denied, but they prove the truth of Islam, and not its falsity. If you find that thieves have broken the doors and windows of a house, do you not conclude that there is something worth stealing inside?” I have reason to believe that this is a well-known retort, for other Europeans in other parts of Persia have been met by it. It is therefore well worth examination. I myself find in it two assumptions which seem to me to be peculiar11 features of Islam. First there is the assumption that the possession of the treasure gives no safety to the doors and windows: that is to say that the possession of true religion does not in any way assist the keeping of God’s commandments. The fact is that Mohammed’s commandment is not expected to be a source of spiritual strength, but only a set of orders. Then there is the equally un-Christian6[118] assumption that the keeping of the moral commandments of God is in no sense the treasure, but something entirely extraneous12 to it, which is not essential to the state of the treasure-holder. These two assumptions are to be found running through the whole of Persian Islam, and producing the most extraordinary results. Very few Mohammedans will hesitate to acknowledge the low state of Mussulman morality as opposed to that of the Armenians, or even of the Parsis, whom they regard as little better than idolaters. If a Mussulman of the teacher class has anything to gain by confessing or making it plain to an infidel that he has been guilty of gross sin, he will not consider that he has in the least forfeited13 his claim to a superior position by doing so.
Of course being non-ethical the religion becomes superstitious14. The Mohammedan considers that there is no known principle by which the commands of the Deity15 can be connected and understood, consequently he admits actions in his religious code which we should regard as ridiculous. The whole theory of Mussulman pilgrimages is absurd, and the practice is even more so. What can be more intrinsically foolish, as well as heartless and cruel, than the custom of sending off[119] the old women, when they are past work, to some holy shrine16, under the impression that, if they die on the very difficult journey, as in a certain class of cases they generally do, they will go straight to Heaven? It is rather a ghastly custom to send vast quantities of bodies for interment in the exceedingly inadequate17 space at Qum, over a country where there is no vehicular transport. But the natural demand for a more easy set of roads to Heaven has caused a multiplication18 of such practices as these far beyond anything that was originally taught in the mosques19. Things have gone so far in this respect, that the most popular edition of the Quran in Persia is a very minute round one in two parts, absolutely illegible21, and only suitable for wearing in a sewn-up case.
As in most superstitious countries, we find a number of superstitions connected with divining; and these are largely sanctioned by the mullas, who will divine with the Quran in a mosque20 for a fee. The commoner form of divining is with a rosary, rather on the plan of “Two, four, six, eight, Mary at the cottage gate.” Persians use this to an extent that is hardly believable. They will consult the beads22 as to whether to send for the doctor, and again, after he has come, to see[120] whether they should buy the medicine he prescribes, and finally, after buying it, they consult them once more before deciding whether the patient shall take a dose. At the same time it is quite permissible23 to “call threes.” A woman with raging toothache got permission from the beads to send for a European lady to extract the tooth, but on taking the beads for the extraction after her arrival they were unfavourable, so arrangements were at once made for divining with the Quran at a mosque, which would of course overrule any result with the beads. A Persian will consider himself quite justified24 in breaking a business engagement if the beads tell him he had better avoid the interview; indeed very often he will not so much as fix a date for the payment of a bill before he has consulted his almanac, and discovered which are the lucky and which are the unlucky days.
CORPSES25 EN ROUTE TO THE QUM CEMETERY27.
SANDY DESERT NEAR YEZD.
The vast empty deserts which surround Yezd, and the huge mountain ridges28 which form the horizon are to the Yezdi by no means empty. It is an axiom of science that Nature abhors29 a vacuum, and it is a corresponding psychological law that the human imagination cannot tolerate absolute emptiness. So the Yezdi, like the[121] Arabian, peoples his deserts with jins and dīvs and devils, and wherever there is a space not filled in he imagines strange forms of animal life. At the risk of being considered superstitious myself I must own that I should like to see some of the travellers’ tales of Persia more carefully investigated, particularly those relating to the existence of very large lizards30 which are dangerous to human life. One is familiar with the defences that are being constantly brought forward for the fable31 of the sea-serpent; how that the sea is after all an almost unknown waste, only crossed in a very few places by well established water-roads that can be most easily avoided; and although the desert cannot be said to afford as much cover as the ocean, for it is not possible to plunge32 below the surface at any point at any time, still its vast expanses are almost as untraversed and unknown as the ocean wastes, and there are not a few places, especially in the mountains, honeycombed with caves and clefts33. This however is a digression. In such a country as I have described, with its vast and barren solitudes34, it would be difficult for a people to exist and maintain their reason, if they did not believe in something corresponding to the jins and divs. Consequently we find jins in the keyholes, jins in[122] the qan’ats, divs in the mountains, divs in the rocks, anywhere, everywhere, a vast population filling up the huge interstices left by Nature. Most of this population is malevolent35; so naturally the ordinary Persian is a mass of charms: nobody goes about without cold iron in his pocket, and a large number of people wear either the sacred book in its entirety, or large portions of it somewhere about their person. Also they are terribly afraid of the evil eye; and numbers of their charms, especially for the children, are directed against it. It is not that they think the evil eye common: any Persian will tell you that very few people have it, but they all know of at least one case, and they are terribly afraid of it, sometimes refusing to admit strangers to their house until they are satisfied they have not got it. If a mother sees a dead body before the birth of her child, then, unless she takes the precaution of placing some salt on the corpse26, and afterwards putting a little of it in the child’s eye, her child will inevitably36 have the evil eye, and everything that is pleasing to its eye will be cursed. The evil eye is likely to kill children of tender years, so very young children are always hidden under the chādar when carried in the street.
[123]
These superstitions are exceedingly general, and sometimes co-exist with a certain amount of intelligence and education. I remember a man who had obviously been in touch with some of the Persian mystics, and was quite capable of discussing and more or less understanding complicated ideas, telling me that he considered that the silkworm owners in the Yezd district were exceedingly wise in refusing to admit strangers to see the worms. He explained to me that they were creatures of such extreme harmlessness and guilelessness that they were peculiarly susceptible37 to malevolent influences from the outside world.
Superstitions of this kind will be found in all countries, and in most lands there are in addition superstitions that seem to be more intimately connected with the religion. The nature of the country fosters the tendency in Persia, and the Parsis are nearly as superstitious as the Mussulmans. But in Mohammedanism the peculiar difficulty is that there is nothing to guide a man in separating the superstitious practices from any connected with a central true idea. The whole religion is a medley38 of trivialities. The history of Mohammed and his[124] early admiration39 for the Jews, with whom he must have been constantly in touch, explains this. He saw the result of their ceremonial law and their national religious customs, binding40 them together and making them a peculiar people in every action of their household life; but of the parabolic significance of this law, of the doctrinal system which governed it, he saw and was taught very little or nothing. Nor did he want it: he wanted simply the political result, and in getting this he was eminently41 successful. He copied the system, but he gave to Islam a maximum of ordinances42 containing a minimum of teaching. After his death the minuti? went on accumulating, until everything in the life of a Mussulman took a religious colour. In Persia the very dress is supposed to be more or less modelled on that worn by the prophet. The people not only kill their animals and eat their food according to the precepts43 of the Quran, but relying on their very extensive traditions they follow a prescribed religious practice in attitude and language. Shiahs are particularly scrupulous44 about certain of their washings, and think almost as much about them as they do about the regularity45 of their prayers. “If I[125] become a Christian, when and how am I to wash myself?” This is one of the commonest questions for an enquirer46 to put to a missionary48. Another very common one is, “How am I to dress?” The Mussulman hardly understands you if you tell him that such points are left to the individual judgment49. I remember a Persian trying to prove to me that I could not possibly consider all meats lawful50 and ceremonially clean, or I should eat cat. It is very difficult to explain to the Yezdi that the drinking of wine at meals is not a necessary Christian institution, and for this reason the consideration of the necessity of maintaining Christian liberty is in Persia rather an argument for total abstinence than against it. In Yezd we are continually being asked whether the commonest peculiarities51 of European custom, such as eating with a knife and fork, were ordained52 by Christ. In one house they had to make away with some kittens, and the servant was directed to dig a hole in the compound for their reception. While he was doing so he asked his mistress, “Did your prophet direct you to bury kittens?” But the extreme point of triviality was reached by a man who had seemed a most intelligent enquirer, and had asked me[126] to explain the essential points of Christianity, to which he listened most attentively53, appearing to weigh them in his mind. When I had finished, he paused to consider the whole position: “Sahib,” he said very slowly, “man mas’ala dāram.”—“Sir, I have a religious question to bring before you.” I said, “Bifarmāyīd.”—“Please proceed.” “āyā Masīh,” he said very deliberately54, “āvāz i sūtrā halāl dānist?”—“Did Christ consider humming lawful?” I reassured55 him on the point, and tried to explain the spiritual nature of Christ’s teaching. I then left the room to get a book, and, when I came back, he was humming to himself contentedly56.
Religion also provides the Yezdi with his entertainments and excitements; the place of the theatre is taken by the Muharram miracle play, and that of the ordinary concert by the rūza khānī or religious recitation, while even street rioting is generally connected with the persecution57 of people who do not agree with the religious opinions of the rioters. All this serves to strengthen the attachment58 of the common people to the religious system, which stands to them in the place of country, standard of etiquette59, habits of life and code of cleanliness. As a matter of[127] fact religion is not quite the right term for the Mohammedan system, for religion means restraint, and the object of almost all of the other systems called religions has been to present a predominant idea which is to govern and restrain all other ideas and aspects of life. In Mohammedanism there is the predominant idea of the tauhid and paighambari, but this conception more resembles the central doctrine60 of a philosophy than the governing principle of a religion. To put it in other words, Mohammed sought by his theological teaching rather to include everything than to control everything. Consequently the Mussulman, who reflects the spirit of his master much more than is generally allowed, is never satisfied with himself unless he is using religious language. What he does matters comparatively little, but the way in which he regards his action matters a great deal. If he forgets to mention God’s name, he corrects himself; but to his mind there is little or no blasphemy61 in connecting God’s name with any action of life, important or trivial, good or bad. The result of this is that those who are accustomed to religions possessing more influence over moral action are amazed at the religiosity of the Mohammedan: but although[128] this religiosity is a fact, the whole wonder of it ceases when the religion is carefully examined. Others are equally astounded62 at what they consider the hypocrisy63 of the Mussulman; but this also is a misnomer64: a Mussulman is not hypocritical: rather he has taken up a position towards affairs which renders hypocrisy unnecessary.
In Persia, at any rate, there is a further mistake which ought to be guarded against. Islam is not mere65 worldliness sanctified by the use of religious terms: it includes a great deal of unworldly thought, although it combines all considerations, worldly or unworldly, with little if any distinction. Still it must be owned that the worldly considerations are apt to predominate, for the Persian Shiah seems to be a reflection of Mohammed, who suggested that pilgrimages should be used for purposes of trade, invited people to become Mussulmans for political reasons, and not only winked66 at the making of converts by threats and terrorism, but laid this down as one of the essential means for spreading the religion. It is not sufficient to call such a system politico-religious, for it not only includes matters of public expediency67 in the religious idea, but it also[129] sanctifies considerations of expediency that are purely personal. Yet there is one thing that the missionary in such a land as Persia cannot too fully realise; and that is that he is dealing with people who are not in the least ashamed of doubleness of motive68. In their view, two purposes are better than one; and when it has been proved that their purposes are worldly, it has still to be considered whether there is not an unworldly purpose as well.
Men frequently come to enquire47 about Christianity, drawn69 by what seems to us a strange mixture of motives70. They naturally enough put their more spiritual purposes first, for they realise that these are most appreciated by those to whom they talk, and they also consider that things like this ought to have a theoretical priority. Temporal needs are, however, much more pressing, and these have just as much claim to be satisfied by a new religion. Of course such a position is likely to be fruitful, not only of the gravest difficulties, but also of the most lamentable71 misunderstandings.
It will be readily understood that a system like this can easily be made to cover ideas which appear inconsistent, and as a matter of fact, it is[130] very difficult to define some of the notions which Persian Shiahs hold to a point of fanaticism72. For instance, there is room for considerable difference of opinion as to how far the Yezdi regards the foreigner as unclean. The Mohammedan is taught to regard as unclean the eating of certain kinds of food, contact with certain animals, and also contact with the persons of people who have not been ceremonially cleansed73. There seem, however, to be degrees of uncleanness. Mohammed in one verse of the Quran declared the food of the Christians74 and Jews, as well as all food that had been properly prepared by a Mussulman, to be lawful; but we cannot suppose that he regarded these different classes of food as equally clean. Bigoted75 Persians sometimes ignore this permission of their prophet’s, and declare that it refers only to dry food prepared by Jews or Christians; but in this they are not consistent, for they eat dry food prepared by pagans also.
The truth is that the attitude of the Persian towards the infidel is not altogether decided76 by Mohammed’s direct teaching, but to a very large extent it is based upon an elementary human feeling which can be found in almost every country under the sun. Most people in England[131] have a physical shrinking from undue77 contact with other persons. We do not care to drink out of a cup that other people have used, until it has been washed; we should, very few of us, care to take alternate bites at an apple with somebody else, and most Englishmen have a very similar objection to kissing. We are much less particular about contact with the hand, though here also we feel that a line has got to be drawn somewhere. Within the family we are less particular. Of course in connection with these things there is in England a great deal of talk about infection and the laws of hygiene78, but the instinct exists apart from any notion of hygiene at all. Now in Persia you have got to remember that everything takes a religious colour, and this has tended to slightly modify the natural instinct, breaking down the wall of reserve within the boundaries of Islam, and giving the feeling the colour of a religious prejudice when applied79 to the outside world. Of course there are hundreds of Yezdi Mussulmans who will eat freely with a European without the slightest scruple80, and a still larger number who do not allow their scruples81 to make any practical difference: at the same time people who wish to get into close touch[132] with the natives should remember that the feeling of nijāsat, or ceremonial uncleanness, is a somewhat complex one, and that it will be more easy to overcome it if a certain discretion82 is observed. Persians eating the food of a European are on the look out for anything which is strange and peculiar, and if such peculiarities are observed they naturally feel more strongly the difference between themselves and their host. This not only renders them less approachable, but it also makes them much more shy of adopting Christian ideas, and in the case of enquirers, who, as I have said before, find it very difficult to understand that our customs are not all regulated by religion, a feeling may grow up that the state of Christianity is not possible to a native Persian.
As this book is not about Mohammedanism but about the Yezdi, I have perhaps devoted83 as much space to the religion of Islam in Yezd as is warranted by my choice of subject matter. At the same time there is no doubt that I have left out a great deal that might have been said, even without going into those details of doctrine and practice which it has been my intention to avoid. I have tried to give some idea of what Islam means to ordinary people in an ordinary[133] Persian town, and I have had to dwell rather more at length on points where there was danger of misconception either through too precise a study of the accurate doctrines84 of Islam, or through a too superficial view of the result. In doing this I fear that I may have passed over too rapidly the more familiar aspects of the religion, the intense excitement of the spectators and actors at the Muharram games, the mourning for Hasan and Husain, the frenzied85 fanaticism of the mob after a rousing sermon at the mosques, and the close adherence86 of many Mussulmans to washing and prayers. This is one side of Shiah Islam, but as it is better known I have attempted to give the other. I cannot, however, leave the subject without reminding those who have to do with Persians of two most important things; first, that there is a real spiritual seeking amongst Mussulmans, and that the presence of worldly motives does not preclude87 it; secondly88, that there is real enthusiasm for their religion in spite of latitudinarian ideas. To the Mussulman, as has been before stated, the system of Islam is everything, and he clings to it as dearly as to life itself, for it represents to him every habit that he has formed, and its cause is the[134] cause of every motive that he acknowledges to be possible.
The religious ceremonies which in Persia arouse the greatest enthusiasm and fervour are essentially89 Shiah. The yearly miracle play in the month of Muharram depicts90 the death of the Imam Husain, son of Ali and Fātima, and grandson of Mohammed. This is the occasion of the most violent exhibitions of emotion on the part of both players and spectators. Men lash91 their naked bodies with chains in an ecstasy92 of frenzy93, and the whole crowd bursts into groans94 and tears of grief. Feeling runs so high, and becomes so unmanageable on these occasions, that the secular95 authorities have tried to keep the performances out of the larger towns. But the atmosphere which is created is not by any means anti-foreign in a general sense. The Imam Husain was done to death by his co-religionists, and tradition reports that a Ferangi ambassador interceded96 with Yazīd for the martyr’s life. This ambassador appears in the play, and Persians often try to borrow an English saddle for his horse from the European residents. At the performance at the big village of Taft, which is near Yezd, I think the ambassador was often dressed as a modern Englishman, but I cannot vouch97 for this. At Yezd itself, the miracle play was not acted; but the carrying of the Nakhl, a ceremony supposed to be fraught98 with the same kind of danger, took place yearly. The Nakhl is a huge wooden erection hung on one side with daggers99, and on the other side with looking-glasses. There are several Nakhls in Yezd, and two are very large. This custom also is connected with the death of the Shiah martyrs100. The Nakhl is supposed to be moved from its place in the square by the miraculous101 agency of[135] Fatima; but a good many people take it on themselves to assist her. Lastly, there is a night set apart for the burning of Omar, the usurping102 Khalif, and the carrying of the effigy103 through the town is the occasion of extreme excitement. One cannot help being strongly reminded of Guy Fawkes’ day in England. Omar, it must be remembered, is a Sunni saint.
点击收听单词发音
1 superstitions | |
迷信,迷信行为( superstition的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 sketching | |
n.草图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 unimpeachable | |
adj.无可指责的;adv.无可怀疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 implicitly | |
adv. 含蓄地, 暗中地, 毫不保留地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 extraneous | |
adj.体外的;外来的;外部的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 forfeited | |
(因违反协议、犯规、受罚等)丧失,失去( forfeit的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 superstitious | |
adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deity | |
n.神,神性;被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 shrine | |
n.圣地,神龛,庙;v.将...置于神龛内,把...奉为神圣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inadequate | |
adj.(for,to)不充足的,不适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 multiplication | |
n.增加,增多,倍增;增殖,繁殖;乘法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 mosques | |
清真寺; 伊斯兰教寺院,清真寺; 清真寺,伊斯兰教寺院( mosque的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 mosque | |
n.清真寺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 illegible | |
adj.难以辨认的,字迹模糊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 beads | |
n.(空心)小珠子( bead的名词复数 );水珠;珠子项链 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 permissible | |
adj.可允许的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 corpses | |
n.死尸,尸体( corpse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 corpse | |
n.尸体,死尸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 cemetery | |
n.坟墓,墓地,坟场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 ridges | |
n.脊( ridge的名词复数 );山脊;脊状突起;大气层的)高压脊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 abhors | |
v.憎恶( abhor的第三人称单数 );(厌恶地)回避;拒绝;淘汰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 lizards | |
n.蜥蜴( lizard的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 fable | |
n.寓言;童话;神话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 plunge | |
v.跳入,(使)投入,(使)陷入;猛冲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 clefts | |
n.裂缝( cleft的名词复数 );裂口;cleave的过去式和过去分词;进退维谷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 solitudes | |
n.独居( solitude的名词复数 );孤独;荒僻的地方;人迹罕至的地方 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 malevolent | |
adj.有恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 susceptible | |
adj.过敏的,敏感的;易动感情的,易受感动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 medley | |
n.混合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 ordinances | |
n.条例,法令( ordinance的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 precepts | |
n.规诫,戒律,箴言( precept的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 scrupulous | |
adj.审慎的,小心翼翼的,完全的,纯粹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 enquirer | |
寻问者,追究者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 enquire | |
v.打听,询问;调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 missionary | |
adj.教会的,传教(士)的;n.传教士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 peculiarities | |
n. 特质, 特性, 怪癖, 古怪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 ordained | |
v.任命(某人)为牧师( ordain的过去式和过去分词 );授予(某人)圣职;(上帝、法律等)命令;判定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 attentively | |
adv.聚精会神地;周到地;谛;凝神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 reassured | |
adj.使消除疑虑的;使放心的v.再保证,恢复信心( reassure的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 contentedly | |
adv.心满意足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 persecution | |
n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 attachment | |
n.附属物,附件;依恋;依附 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 etiquette | |
n.礼仪,礼节;规矩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 blasphemy | |
n.亵渎,渎神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 astounded | |
v.使震惊(astound的过去式和过去分词);愕然;愕;惊讶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 misnomer | |
n.误称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 winked | |
v.使眼色( wink的过去式和过去分词 );递眼色(表示友好或高兴等);(指光)闪烁;闪亮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 expediency | |
n.适宜;方便;合算;利己 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 lamentable | |
adj.令人惋惜的,悔恨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 fanaticism | |
n.狂热,盲信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 cleansed | |
弄干净,清洗( cleanse的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 bigoted | |
adj.固执己见的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 undue | |
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 hygiene | |
n.健康法,卫生学 (a.hygienic) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 scruple | |
n./v.顾忌,迟疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 scruples | |
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 frenzied | |
a.激怒的;疯狂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 adherence | |
n.信奉,依附,坚持,固着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 preclude | |
vt.阻止,排除,防止;妨碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 secondly | |
adv.第二,其次 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 depicts | |
描绘,描画( depict的第三人称单数 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 lash | |
v.系牢;鞭打;猛烈抨击;n.鞭打;眼睫毛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 ecstasy | |
n.狂喜,心醉神怡,入迷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 frenzy | |
n.疯狂,狂热,极度的激动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 groans | |
n.呻吟,叹息( groan的名词复数 );呻吟般的声音v.呻吟( groan的第三人称单数 );发牢骚;抱怨;受苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 secular | |
n.牧师,凡人;adj.世俗的,现世的,不朽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 interceded | |
v.斡旋,调解( intercede的过去式和过去分词 );说情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 vouch | |
v.担保;断定;n.被担保者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 fraught | |
adj.充满…的,伴有(危险等)的;忧虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 daggers | |
匕首,短剑( dagger的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 miraculous | |
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 usurping | |
篡夺,霸占( usurp的现在分词 ); 盗用; 篡夺,篡权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 effigy | |
n.肖像 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |