There were other transactions besides those of the American campaign, during the year, which demand notice. Rodney co-operated with a body of troops under General Vaughan in an attempt to recover the island of St. Vincent, which the French had taken in the previous year, but they were not successful. They then turned their attack on the island of St. Eustatia, belonging to the Dutch, and the governor not having heard the news of the war, they met with no resistance. The capture was a most valuable one; the whole island seemed one great store of Dutch and American products and goods. There were one hundred and fifty merchant vessels15 in the harbour all secured, besides six ships of war and a fleet of thirty Dutch West Indiamen, which had just left, but which were sent after and brought back. The value of the whole prize was estimated at three millions eight hundred thousand pounds. A large quantity of the merchandise belonged to Englishmen, who were engaged thus in supplying the Americans through this channel. Rodney confiscated17 the whole of it. In vain did the owners demand, through the Assembly of St. Kitt's, the restoration of those goods; Rodney would not listen to them. Besides St. Eustatia, the small neighbouring islands of St. Martin and Saba, and the Dutch settlements on the rivers of Demerara and Essequibo, in Guiana, were taken with their ships and property. The Dutch trade in these parts received a mortal blow. On the other hand, the French, under the Marquis de Bouillé, captured the island of Tobago.
The English now began to contemplate18 taking the Cape19 of Good Hope from the Dutch. General Johnstone was dispatched in April with five ships of the line, some frigates20, and smaller vessels, having on board General Medows and three regiments21 for this purpose; but encountering Admiral Suffren in the way, after an indecisive action, Johnstone fell in with and took a Dutch East Indiaman of great value, and learned through it that Suffren had managed to reach the Cape and give the alarm, and that the Cape was put into strong defence. Johnstone, therefore, made for Saldanha Bay, where he learned that a number of other Dutch East Indiamen were lying. Four of these he secured; the rest were run ashore23 by their commanders and burnt. During the autumn both Dutch and French suffered much from the British on the coasts of Coromandel and the island of Sumatra. They also took from the Dutch Negapatam, Penang, and other places.
Meanwhile, Florida Blanca had planned the capture of Minorca. He prevailed on France, though with difficulty, to assist. The Duke de Crillon, a Frenchman, was made commander of the expedition, and on the 22nd of July the united fleets of France and Spain sailed out of Cadiz Bay, and stretched out into the ocean, as if intending to make a descent on England. The main part of the fleet did, in fact, sail into the English Channel. But they did not venture to attack Admiral Darby, and contented24 themselves with picking up a number of merchant vessels; and again dissensions and disease breaking out, this great fleet separated, and each nation returned to its respective ports, without effecting anything worthy25 of such an armament. But a lesser26 portion of this fleet, on coming out of harbour, carrying eight thousand troops, stores, and ordnance27, had passed through the Straits of Gibraltar, and[285] appeared suddenly before Port Mahon. On the 19th of August the troops were landed near Port Mahon, and, being favoured by the inhabitants, once under the sway of Spain, and good Catholics, they soon invested the fort, and compelled General Murray, who formerly28 so bravely defended Quebec, to retire to Fort St. Philip, leaving the town of Port Mahon in their possession. Despite the resolute29 defence of his men, Murray was forced to surrender the island.
EDMUND BURKE. (After the portrait by George Romney.)
[See larger version]
There were various actions at sea, in one quarter or other. Sir Hyde Parker, convoying a merchant fleet from the Baltic, on the 5th of August fell in with Admiral Zouttman near the Dogger Bank, also convoying a fleet of Dutch traders. An engagement took place, Zouttman having a few men-of-war more than Parker. The engagement was terrible. The ships on both sides were severely31 damaged, and the Hollandia—a sixty-four-gun ship of Zouttman's—went down with all its crew. Many of the other ships were with difficulty kept afloat. On reaching the Nore, the king and the Prince of Wales went on board, where they highly complimented both Parker and the rest of the officers. On the 12th of December Admiral Kempenfeldt, with thirteen ships-of-the-line, discovered, off Ushant, the French fleet, under De Guichen, convoying a fleet of transports and merchantmen, bound, some for the East and others for the West Indies, with troops and stores. The fleet of De Guichen was far superior to that of Kempenfeldt, but, the convoy30 being at a considerable distance from the transports and traders, Kempenfeldt adroitly32 made himself master of twenty sail of these vessels, and sailed off with them; and within a few days afterwards he[286] captured five more of these ships. There were also other fights of minor1 importance.
On the 27th of November, only two days after the receipt of the news of the surrender of Lord Cornwallis, Parliament met. The king adverted33 to the unhappy event, but still declared that he should be betraying his trust, as sovereign of a free people, if he did not refuse to give up the contest; that he still trusted in Divine Providence35, and he called for fresh, animated36, and united exertions37. He turned with more satisfaction to the successes in the East Indies, and the safe arrival of our principal mercantile fleets. In the Lords, the Earl of Shelburne attacked the Address, supported by the Duke of Richmond and the Lords Camden and Rockingham; but the most tempestuous40 burst of indignant eloquence41 from the Opposition took place in the Commons. Fox asserted that he had listened to the Address with horror and amazement42. He declared himself confounded at the hardihood of Ministers, after such a consummation of their imbecile management, who dared to look the House of Commons in the face. He would not say that they were paid by France, for it was not possible for him to prove the fact; but, if they were not, he avowed44 that they deserved to be, for they had served the French monarch45 more faithfully and successfully than ever Ministers served a master. He especially singled out Lord Sandwich for reprobation47, as the author of the wretched condition of our fleets, which were inferior in number of ships and their appointments to those of the enemy all over the globe. He called on the House to insist on the total and immediate48 change of Ministers, and urged the adoption49 of measures which should, if possible, repair the incalculable injuries they had inflicted50 on the nation. The Ministers, however, had strength enough to carry the Address by two hundred and eighteen votes against one hundred and twenty-nine; but the debate was resumed on the Address being reported, and then William Pitt delivered a most scathing51 speech, declaring that so far from our being warranted in pressing this ruinous war, he was satisfied that, if he went from one end of the Treasury52 bench to the other, such was the condition of the Ministry, he should find that there was not one man who could trust his neighbour; and the truth of this was becoming strikingly evident. Dundas, the Lord Advocate, hitherto one of the staunchest supporters of Lord North, spoke53 now as in astonishment54 at the language of the Ministers, declaring that some of them in Council clearly did not give their honest opinions. There were other like symptoms of defection; the sensitive placemen saw that the end of the North Administration was at hand. Lord North, perceiving the ground failing beneath him, lowered his tone, and, on Sir James Lowther, seconded by Mr. Powys, proposing a resolution that the war against America had been an utter failure, he explained that he did not advocate, in future, a continental55 warfare56 there, a marching of troops through the provinces, from north to south, but only the retention57 of ports on the coast, for the protection of our fleets in those seas, and the repulse58 of the French and Spaniards. Parliament was adjourned59 on the 20th of December till the 21st of January, and thus closed the year 1781.
Ill news flowed in apace from all quarters during the recess60. The Marquis de Bouillé had surprised and retaken St. Eustatia. The new conquests in Demerara and Essequibo had also been retaken. Bouillé having secured St. Eustatia, next turned his arms against the old and valuable island of St. Kitt's. He then landed eight thousand men at Basseterre, the capital, whose movements were protected by the fleet under De Grasse. General Fraser and Governor Shirley took post on the rugged61 heights of Brimstone Hill, and made a stout62 defence, whilst Sir Samuel Hood43, who had followed De Grasse from the Chesapeake, boldly interposed between the French admiral and the French troops on shore. Hood twice beat off De Grasse; but the British fleet and army were much too inconsiderable to maintain the conquest. The island was finally taken, and after it the smaller ones of Nevis and Montserrat, so that of all the Leeward63 Islands we had only Barbadoes and Antigua left.
These dispiriting losses, combined with the fall of Minorca, stimulated64 the public and the mercantile bodies to petition earnestly for the termination of the American war; and Parliament met at the appointed time amid numbers of such demands. Petitions came from the cities of London and Westminster, and many other towns and counties, bearing rather the features of remonstrances65. No sooner did the House meet than Fox moved for an inquiry66 into the causes of the constant failure of our fleets in these enterprises, on which so much had depended. The object was to crush Lord Sandwich, the head of the Admiralty. Fox's motion was rejected, but only by a majority of twenty-two. The strength of Ministers was fast ebbing67.
The first symptom of the breaking up was the[287] necessity felt for the dismissal of Lord George Germaine, who had contributed so essentially68 to the defeats in America. But even then the king would not consent that he should resign without conferring a peerage on him, observing, "No one can then say he is disgraced." No quiet was now allowed to the declining Ministers. Fox, on the 20th of February, strongly seconded by William Pitt, made another attack on Lord Sandwich, this time including the whole Board of Admiralty; and the motion was only lost by nineteen. Another, and perhaps more formidable, enemy now stood forward. This was General Conway, who enjoyed the highest esteem69 of the House, and had been the first to propose the abolition70 of the fatal Stamp Act. He moved, on the 22nd of February, that the House should address his Majesty71, entreating72 that he would "listen to the advice of his Commons, that the war on the continent of North America might no longer be pursued for the impracticable purpose of reducing the inhabitants of that country to obedience74 by force." After a great debate, the House divided two hours after midnight, and Ministers were reduced to a majority of one, the votes being one hundred and ninety-four against one hundred and ninety-three. Five days after, General Conway again moved that any further attempts against America would weaken the efforts of England against her European enemies, and, by further irritating the colonies, render the desired peace more difficult. The resolution was carried against Government by two hundred and thirty-four against two hundred and fifteen. Finally, on the 15th of March Sir John Rous moved a vote of want of confidence, which was again lost by a minority of only nine. It was instantly determined75 to renew this motion through Lord Surrey; and Lord North saw so clearly that nothing could now avert76 his fall, that he implored77 the king most earnestly to accept his resignation. George sent for Lord North on the 20th, and addressed him in these words:—"Considering the temper of the House, I thought the Administration at an end." Lord North instantly seized on the words, saying:—"Then, sire, had I not better state the fact at once?" The king consented, and North hurried down to the House of Commons in his court-dress, as he was.
It was five o'clock—the House densely78 crowded; for Lord Surrey was going to make the great Opposition motion of want of confidence, and only waited for the arrival of the Minister. As North hurried up the House, there were loud cries of "Order! order! Places! places!" North no sooner reached the Treasury bench than he rose to make his important disclosure; but the Opposition called vociferously79 for Lord Surrey, while the Ministerial members called for Lord North. Fox then moved that "Lord Surrey do speak first," but North instantly exclaimed, "I rise to speak to that motion." Being now obliged to hear him, for he was perfectly80 in order, he observed, that, had they suffered him at once to proceed, he might have saved them much useless noise and confusion, for, without any disrespect to the noble lord, he was going to show that his motion was quite unnecessary, as the Ministers had resigned, and that that resignation was accepted by the king! He had only wanted to announce that fact, and to move an adjournment81 of a few days, in order to make the necessary arrangements for the new Administration. Never was there a more profound surprise. The House was adjourned for five days, and the members prepared to depart and spread the news. But it proved a wild, snowy evening; the carriages had not been ordered till midnight, and whilst the members were standing82 about in crowds waiting for their equipages, rather than walk home through the snow, Lord North, who had kept his carriage, put three or four of his friends into it, and, bowing to the other members, said, laughingly, "You see, gentlemen, the advantage of being in the secret. Good night!"
The king, in the first instance, applied83 to Lord Shelburne to form a Ministry; but he was bound by engagements to Wentworth House, and honourably84 refused to take the lead. George then tried Lord Gower as ineffectually, and so was compelled to send for Lord Rockingham, who accepted office, on the condition that peace should be made with America, including the acknowledgment of its independence, if unavoidable; administrative85 reform, on the basis of Mr. Burke's three Bills; and the expulsion of contractors86 from Parliament, and revenue officers from the exercise of the elective franchise87. The king stood strongly on the retention of Lord Chancellor88 Thurlow and Lord Stormont in their offices. Rockingham, with reluctance89, conceded the retention of Thurlow, but refused that of Stormont. The choice of Lord Rockingham was such as could only have been made where family influence and party cliques90 had more weight than the proper object of a Minister—the able management of national affairs. Rockingham, though a very honourable91 man, was never a man of any ability, and though now only[288] fifty-two, his health and faculties92, such as they were, were fast failing. Besides this, there was a violent jealousy93 between him and Lord Shelburne, who became his colleague, and brought in half of the Cabinet. The shape which the Ministry eventually assumed was this:—Lord Rockingham became First Lord of the Treasury and Premier4; the Earl of Shelburne and Charles Fox, Secretaries of State; Thurlow, Lord Chancellor; Camden, notwithstanding his age, President of the Council; Duke of Grafton, Privy94 Seal; Lord John Cavendish, Chancellor of the Exchequer95; Keppel—made a viscount—First Lord of the Admiralty; General Conway, Commander of the Forces; the Duke of Richmond, Master-General of Ordnance; Dunning—as Lord Ashburton—Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. Burke was not admitted to the Cabinet, for the Whigs were too great sticklers96 for birth and family; but his indispensable ability insured him the Paymastership of the Forces—by far the most lucrative97 office in the hands of Government, but the salary of which he was pledged to reduce by his Bill. Pitt was offered a place as Lord of the Treasury; but he had already declared, on the 8th of March, on the debate on Lord John Cavendish's motion, that he would never accept a subordinate situation. Dundas remained in office, as Lord Advocate, and John Lee was made Solicitor-General. Such was the new Administration: it embraced, as leaders, five Rockinghamites and five Shelburnites. The eleventh member of the Cabinet, Thurlow, belonged to neither side, but was the king's man. Fox saw himself in office with him with great repugnance98, and Burke felt the slight put upon him in excluding him from the Cabinet.
On the 28th of March the Ministry, as completed, was announced in the House, and the writs99 for the re-elections having been issued, the House adjourned for the Easter holidays, and on the 8th of April met for business. The first affairs which engaged the attention of the new Administration were those of Ireland. We have already seen that, in 1778, the Irish, encouraged by the events in North America, and by Lord North's conciliatory proposals to Congress, appealed to the British Government for the removal of unjust restrictions101 from themselves, and how free trade was granted them in 1780. These concessions103 were received in Ireland with testimonies104 of loud approbation105 and professions of loyalty106; but they only encouraged the patriot107 party to fresh demands. These were for the repeal108 of the two obnoxious109 Acts which conferred the legislative supremacy110 regarding Irish affairs on England. These Acts were—first, Poynings' Act, so called from Sir Edward Poynings, and passed in the reign34 of Henry VII., which gave to the English Privy Council the right to see, alter, or suppress any Bill before the Irish Parliament, money Bills excepted; the second was an Act of George I., which asserted in the strongest terms the right of the king, Lords, and Commons of England to legislate111 for Ireland.
Grattan determined to call these Acts in question in the Irish Parliament, and at least abolish them there. This alarmed even Burke, who, writing to Ireland, said, "Will no one stop that madman, Grattan?" But Grattan, on the 19th of April, 1780, submitted to the Irish House of Commons a resolution asserting the perfect legislative independence of Ireland. He did not carry his motion then, but his speech—in his own opinion, the finest he ever made—had a wonderful effect on the Irish public. Other matters connected with sugar duties, and an Irish Mutiny Bill, in which Grattan took the lead, fanned the popular flame, and the Volunteer body at the same time continued to assume such rapidly growing activity that it was deemed necessary by Government to send over the Earl of Carlisle to supersede112 the Earl of Buckinghamshire, and to give him an able secretary in Mr. Eden. But this did not prevent the Irish Volunteers from meeting at Dungannon on the 15th of February, 1782. There were two hundred and forty-two delegates, with their general-in-chief, Lord Charlemont, at their head, and they unanimously passed a resolution prepared by Grattan, "That a claim of any body of men other than the King, Lords, and Commons of Ireland, to bind113 this kingdom, is unconstitutional, illegal, and a grievance114." On the 22nd, Grattan moved a similar resolution in the Irish House of Commons, which was only got rid of by the Attorney-General asking for some time to consider it. Two days only before Grattan had made his motion on Irish rights, that is, on the 20th of February, he seconded a Bill for further relief of Roman Catholics in Ireland, introduced by Mr. Gardiner. The Bill was passed, and wonderfully increased the influence of Grattan by adding the grateful support of all the Catholics. Such was the tone of Ireland, and such the transcendent influence of Grattan there, when the new Whig Ministry assumed office.
Grattan had given notice that on the 16th of April he would move for the utter repeal of the Acts destructive of the independent legislative[289] rights of Ireland. On the appointed day, the House of Commons having been expressly summoned by the Speaker, Grattan rose, and, assuming the question already as carried, began, "I am now to address a free people. Ages have passed away, and this is the first moment in which you could be distinguished115 by that appellation116. I have found Ireland on her knees; I have watched over her with an eternal solicitude117; I have traced her progress from injury to arms, from arms to liberty. Spirit of Swift! spirit of Molyneux! your genius has prevailed! Ireland is now a nation. In that new character I hail her, and, bowing to her august presence, I say, Esto Perpetua!" The speech was received with thunders of applause. It concluded with an Address to the Crown, declaring in the plainest, boldest language, that no body of men, except the Irish Parliament, had a right to make laws by which that nation could be bound. The Address was carried by acclamation; it was carried with nearly equal enthusiasm by the Lords, and then both Houses adjourned to await the decision of the Parliament and Ministry of Great Britain.
HENRY GRATTAN.
[See larger version]
This was a serious position of affairs for the consideration of the new Whig Ministry. They were called on to declare, either that Ireland was part of the empire, and subject to the same laws, as regarded the empire, as Great Britain, or that it was distinctly a separate empire under the same king, just as Hanover was. The Ministry of Rockingham have been severely blamed by one political party, and highly lauded118 by another, for conceding the claims of Ireland on that head so readily; for they came to the conclusion to yield them fully46. They were by no means blind to the[290] difficulties of the case, and to the evils that might arise from a decision either way. But the case with the present Ministry was one of simple necessity. England had committed the great error of refusing all concession102 to demanded rights in the case of America, and now lay apparently119 too exhausted120 by the fight to compel submission121, with all Europe in arms against her. Ireland, aware of this, was in arms, and determined to profit by the crisis. Fox, therefore, on the 17th of May, announced the intention of Ministers at once to acknowledge the independence of Ireland by repealing122 the Act of the 6th of George I. Fox, in his speech, declared that it was far better to have the Irish willing subjects to the Crown than bitter enemies. The Bill repealing the 6th of George I. accordingly passed both Houses as a matter of course, and the effect upon Ireland was such, that in the first ebullition of the national joy the Irish House of Commons voted one hundred thousand pounds to raise twenty thousand seamen123. The Irish Commons, moreover, offered to grant Grattan, for his patriotic124 and successful exertions in this cause, a similar sum, to purchase him an estate. Grattan—though a poor man, his income at that time scarcely exceeding five hundred pounds a year—disinterestedly refused such a sum, and was only with difficulty induced ultimately to accept half of it.
There were not wanting, however, those who strove to disturb the joy of Ireland, and the peace of England thus acquired, by sowing suspicions of the sincerity125 of England, and representing that the independence granted was spurious rather than real. Amongst these, Flood, the rival of Grattan in political and Parliamentary life, took the lead. He seized on every little circumstance to create doubts of the English carrying out the concession faithfully. He caught at an imprudent motion of the Earl of Abingdon, in the Peers, and still more vivaciously126 at the decision of an appeal from Ireland, in the Court of King's Bench, by Lord Mansfield. The case had remained over, and it was deemed impracticable to send it back to Ireland, though nearly finished before the Act of Repeal. Fox explained the case, and made the most explicit127 declaration of the "full, complete, absolute, and perpetual surrender of the British legislative and judicial128 supremacy over Ireland." But the suspicions had been too adroitly infused to be removed without a fresh and still more positive Act, which was passed in the next Session.
The claims of Ireland seeming, for the moment, to be happily satisfied, Ministers now proceeded to carry out those reforms for which they had loudly called during the many years that they had been in opposition. They adopted and introduced the Bills of Sir Philip Clerke and Mr. Carew for excluding contractors from the House of Commons, and revenue officers from voting at elections. The Bill against the contractors passed the Commons with little difficulty; but the Ministers immediately felt the mischief129 of allowing Lord Thurlow to retain his place of Chancellor. He opposed the measure vehemently130, and divided the House upon it. Lord Mansfield gave it his cordial resistance, and the new Lord Ashburton, though created by the present Administration, tacked39 to it a clause exempting132 all gentlemen who merely contracted for the produce of their estates. The clause, however, was lopped away again on the return of the Bill to the Commons, and the Act passed without it. The Bill for disqualifying revenue officers was opposed with equal pertinacity134 by Thurlow and Mansfield; though Lord Rockingham stated that the elections in seventy boroughs135 depended chiefly on revenue officers, and that nearly twelve thousand of such officers created by the late Ministry had votes in other places. The Bill passed, after exempting all officers who held their posts for life, and therefore were charitably supposed to be beyond the reach of undue137 influence, as if no such thing as promotion138 had its effect.
On the 15th of April a message was sent down to both Houses from the king, in conformity139 with his pledge to the new Ministry, with regard to Mr. Burke's plan of economical reform, which it proposed should be a measure of effectual retrenchment140, and to include his Majesty's own Civil List. Lord Shelburne, in communicating it to the Lords, assured the House that this was no mere133 ministerial message, but was the genuine language of the king himself, proceeding141 from the heart. Burke, in the Commons, used more exuberant142 terms of eulogy143, declaring that "it was the best of messages to the best of people from the best of kings!" Early in May he moved for leave to bring in his Bill on the subject, and then most of the promised wonders of reform and retrenchment vanished. The duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster and the principality of Wales were at once cut out of his scheme of reform. The plan of supplying the Royal Household by contract was abandoned; the Ordnance Office, in the hands of the Duke of Richmond, was not to be touched, nor the Treasurer144 of the Household's office; and some[291] other of the royal establishments, which were mere sinecures145, were left. But he succeeded in lopping off the third Secretaryship of State, which had been created for the American colonies, and was useless now they were gone; the Lords of Trade and Plantations147; the Lords of Police in Scotland; the principal officers of the Great Wardrobe, Jewel Office, Treasurer of the Chamber148, Cofferer of the Household, six Clerks of the Board of Green Cloth—in all, about a dozen offices were swept away. The Pension List was vigorously revised. No pension was to exceed three hundred pounds a year, and not more than six hundred pounds was to be granted in pensions in any one year; the names of the persons to whom they were granted were to be laid before Parliament within twenty days after the beginning of each session, until the amount in the Pension List should reach ninety thousand pounds. The Secret Service money was, at the same time, limited; and a solemn oath was to be administered to the Secretaries of State regarding its proper employment. It may be imagined what were the consternation149 and the disgust of the large class which had been revelling150 on these misappropriated funds of the nation. Burke, in a letter, describes feelingly the gauntlet he had to run in proceeding with his reform. "I was loaded," he says, "with hatred151 for everything withheld152, and with obloquy153 for everything given." What, however, brought unjust odium on him, but just reproach on the Cabinet, was, that Lord Rockingham made haste, before the Bill was passed, to grant enormous pensions to his supporters and colleagues, Lord Ashburton and Colonel Barré. The latter ardent154 patriot, who, whilst Burke's Bill was in consideration, said it did not go far enough in reform, now willingly pocketed three thousand two hundred pounds a year, as a pension, besides the salary of his office. In the House of Lords, Thurlow again attacked the Bill, supported by Lords Mansfield and Loughborough; but it passed, and Burke immediately gave an illustrious proof of his disinterestedness155, by bringing in a Bill for regulating and reducing the enormous emoluments156 of his own office, the Paymastership of the Forces.
From economical and colonial, Ministers proceeded to Parliamentary reform. Sir Harbord Harbord had introduced, before their accession to office, a Bill to disfranchise the rotten borough136 of Cricklade, in Wiltshire, as Shoreham had already been disfranchised. The new Ministry supported it, with the exception of their strange colleague, Thurlow, whom they ought to have insisted on being dismissed. Cricklade was a thoroughly157 venal158 borough, regularly sold to some East Indian nabob; and Mr. Frederick Montagu, in the debate, quoted Lord Chatham's remark on Shoreham, which had also been the purchased lair159 of Indian corruptionists, that he "was glad to find the borough of Shoreham likely to be removed from Bengal to its ancient situation in the county of Sussex."
The success with Cricklade encouraged William Pitt to bring forward a motion for a general reform of Parliament. This he did on the 7th of May, and was seconded by Wilkes's old ally, Alderman Sawbridge. Pitt did not venture to talk of a Bill, but only to propose a Committee to consider the subject. This was granted; but it was soon apparent that nothing would be done. The Ministers were at variance162 on the subject—some went one length, and some another; many of them were as determined against all Parliamentary reform as any Tories. Rockingham, the Prime Minister, especially, held much borough influence. He was utterly163 opposed, in secret, to all such reforms. Pitt himself would hear nothing of repealing the Septennial Act; but he was for sweeping164 away rotten boroughs and transferring their votes to the counties; he went for equalising the whole representation, for destroying the influence of the Treasury and the hereditary165 right assumed by the aristocracy, and, by disfranchising the rotten boroughs, for sweeping the House of the creatures of the India House. He was zealously166 supported by Fox, Sheridan, Sir George Savile; and the Duke of Richmond, in the Lords, warmly commended the movement; but the motion had the fate that might have been expected—it was negatived, though only by twenty votes.
But the matters most important, and in which the Rockingham Ministry succeeded the best, were those of attempting to accomplish the peace with America, and with the Continental nations, on which they had so long and so loudly insisted. Fox first tried his diplomatic genius with the Dutch, whom he could, as he boasted, soon conciliate; but, to his infinite chagrin167, that calculating people were so elated by the recent ill success of the English, and relied so completely on the powerful fleets of France and Spain to protect their trade and islands, that they returned a contemptuous answer, declaring that they could not treat without their allies. Still more mortifying168 was his repulse by the Americans. His offers of negotiations for peace were received with a haughty169 indifference170 by Congress, and he was[292] again referred to France. Fox now had recourse to the mediations of Russia and Prussia. But Frederick the Great declined to intervene, and the Czarina Catherine coupled her offers of alliance with conditions which the king and the majority of the Cabinet refused to accept, though Fox thought they were reasonable.
Scarcely was the Rockingham Administration formed when they determined to recall England's ablest admiral, Sir George Rodney, and they carried this into execution in May of this year, and appointed Admiral Pigott in his stead. Lord Keppel, who had shown himself so sensitive in his own case, now he was at the head of the Admiralty not only recalled Rodney because he was of another party, but he did it in the coldest and most direct manner, through his secretary, Mr. Stephen. However, before this order of recall was issued—the 1st of May—Rodney had fought one of the greatest and most decisive battles which adorn172 the history of our navy. He had gone in all haste to the West Indies, with fourteen ships of the line, to join Sir Samuel Hood, who was vainly contending against the fleet of De Grasse and a strong land force at St. Christopher's. But, as De Grasse had landed eight thousand men, under De Bouillé, and Hood had no land troops, he could not save the island. After its capture Rodney fell in with him, and their united fleet amounted to thirty-six ships of the line. It was well, for Hood informed Rodney that De Grasse was intending to join the Spanish general, Galvez, at St. Domingo, where they were to sail for a grand attack on the chief of the British West India Islands, Jamaica, almost the only island, excepting Barbadoes and Antigua, which Britain now owned in that part of the globe. On the 8th of April he was signalled that the French fleet was unmoored and proceeding to sea. Rodney instantly put out, and the next morning discovered this fleet under Dominica. The wind being in favour of De Grasse, he stood away for Guadeloupe; but Rodney gave chase, and Hood's squadron getting far in advance, De Grasse veered173 round in the hope of beating him before the rest of Rodney's fleet could come up. Hood received the fire of three men-of-war in the Barfleur, his ship, for some time; but he stood bravely to the enemy, and the wind now favouring Rodney, he came up and joined in the engagement. Several ships on each side were so much damaged that they were almost useless, and Captain Bayne, of the Alfred, was killed. The next morning the French were nearly out of sight; but Rodney pressed after them, for he knew that if they succeeded in joining the Spaniards, he should have sixty sail, instead of thirty-six, to contend with.
On the evening of the 11th he had the satisfaction to find himself close to the enemy, and at daybreak of the 12th the battle began. At first there was so little wind that Rodney was unable to put into execution his long-cherished scheme of breaking right through the centre of the enemy's line, and beating one half before the other could come to the rescue. About noon a breeze sprang up, and afforded the long-desired opportunity. Rodney was now in the van, and after Captain Gardiner, in the Duke, had made the first attempt and fallen back disabled, Rodney's own ship, the Formidable, broke through, followed by the Namur and the Canada. The great end of Rodney was gained. He had cut in two the vast fleet, and his ships doubling on one half threw the whole into confusion. The half to the windward were terribly raked, whilst the half to the leeward were unable to come up to their aid. The battle, however, continued without respite174 from noon till evening, the leeward half endeavouring to join and return to the charge, but without being able. The most striking part of the action was the attack on the great ship of De Grasse, the Ville de Paris. That huge vessel14, the pride of the French navy, towering over all far and near, attracted the ambition of Captain Cornwallis, of the Canada, the brother of Lord Cornwallis, to whose surrender De Grasse had so largely contributed. Captain Cornwallis, as if determined on a noble revenge, attacked the Ville de Paris with fury, hugely as it towered above him, and so well did he ply16 his guns that he soon reduced the monster almost to a wreck175. De Grasse fought desperately176, but Hood coming up in the Barfleur, about sunset, to the assistance of Cornwallis, De Grasse was compelled to strike his flag. On board the Ville de Paris were found thirty-six chests of money, intended to pay the conquerors177 of Jamaica, and on the other ships nearly all the battering178 trains for that purpose. The remainder of the fleet made all sail, and Rodney pursued, but was stopped by a calm of three days under Guadeloupe, and they escaped. Rodney sailed to Jamaica, which he had thus saved, and was received with acclamations of honour and gratitude179. There, however, he received the order for his recall, and returned home. To the eternal dishonour180 of the Rockingham Administration, on receiving the news of this superb and most important victory—a victory which at once restored the drooping181 glories of Great Britain—they had not the pluck to cancel his recall, though the feeling of the country compelled the Crown to grant him a pension, and to raise him to the peerage by the title of Baron182 Rodney.
[293]
THE ATTACK ON THE "VILLE DE PARIS." (See p. 292.)
[See larger version]
[294]
The prizes of Rodney, including the great Ville de Paris, on their way home were assailed183 with a violent tempest, and went down, so that the English people had not the gratification of seeing the largest ship in the world, which had been captured by Rodney. The Dutch were encouraged to attempt coming out of the Texel, and waylaying184 our Baltic merchant fleet, but Lord Howe, with twelve sail-of-the-line, was sent after them, and they quickly ran. His lordship remained there blockading them till the 28th of June, when he was compelled to leave his post and sail westward185, with twenty-one ships-of-the-line and some frigates, to watch the great combined fleet of France and Spain, which had issued from Cadiz. The united fleet—thirty-six sail-of-the-line, besides frigates—kept aloof186, however, and allowed him safely to convoy home the Jamaica merchant fleet, guarded by Sir Peter Parker.
No sooner did Howe return to port than he had orders to sail in aid of Gibraltar, which was not only greatly in need of stores and provisions, but was menaced by the combined armies and fleets of France and Spain with one great and overwhelming attack. The evil fortune of England did not yet, however, seem to have disappeared, for the Royal George, the finest vessel in the service, went down in a sudden squall. But this awful catastrophe187 did not hinder the sailing of Lord Howe. He had by great exertion38 mustered188 a fleet of thirty-four sail-of-the-line, and on the 11th of September steered189 out for Gibraltar. For upwards190 of three years this famous rock had now been beleaguered191. After the relief thrown in by Admiral Darby, the Spaniards, despairing of reducing the garrison192 by blockade, determined to destroy the town and works by a terrific bombardment. This bombardment was, accordingly, opened with unexampled fury, and continued incessantly193 for days and weeks. The town was set on fire, and numbers of houses consumed; the damage done to the ramparts and public buildings was appalling194. General Elliot displayed the utmost temper and skill during this bombardment, as he did throughout the whole siege. He continued by night, and at other opportunities, to repair actively195 the damages done; and, reserving his fire for occasions when he saw a chance of doing particular damage, he caused the enemy to wonder at the little impression that they made.
But, in the autumn of 1781, they resolved on a renewed attack of the most vigorous kind. Elliot received information of this, and determined to anticipate the plan. At midnight of the 26th of November he ordered out all his grenadiers and light infantry196, including the two veteran regiments with which he had seen service in Germany so many years ago, the 12th, and the regiment22 of General Hardenberg. Three hundred sailors volunteered to accompany them, and the brave old general himself could not stay behind. The detachment marched silently through the soft sand, and entered the fourth line almost before the Spanish sentinel was aware of them. In a very few minutes the enemy was in full flight towards the village of Campo, and the English set to work, under direction of the engineer officers, to destroy the works which had cost the Spaniards such enormous labour to erect197. The Spaniards for several days appeared so stupefied that they allowed their works to burn without any attempt to check the fire. In the following month of December, however, they slowly resumed their bombardment. Nevertheless, it was not till the spring of 1782 that the Spaniards were cheered by the news that the Duke of Crillon was on his way to join them with the army which had conquered Minorca.
In April De Crillon arrived, and was followed by the Spanish and French troops from Minorca. From eighteen to twenty thousand men were added to the army already encamped before the place, and the most able engineers were engaged from almost all countries of Europe, at extravagant198 salaries, and great rewards were offered for inventions which might demolish199 the formidable works of the English on the rock. Nearly forty thousand troops were now congregated200 against the old fortress201. One hundred and seventy pieces of heavy artillery202 were directed against it, and immense stores of ammunition203 were accumulated for this final and triumphant204 achievement. On the other hand, General Elliot had now repaired and strengthened his defences more than ever. His garrison was augmented205 to seven thousand men, including a marine206 brigade; eighty pieces of cannon207 frowned from the walls, and the bulk of his men were of the best and most seasoned kind.
THE DEFENCE OF GIBRALTAR BY LORD HEATHFIELD, 1782.
From the Painting by J. S. Copley, R.A., at the National Gallery.
[See larger version]
[295]
De Crillon, seeing that his bombardment from shore produced little effect, determined to make the attack also from the sea. Amongst the multiplicity of inventions which the offered rewards had produced, the Chevalier D'Arcon, a French engineer, had produced a scheme which excited the most confident expectations. The plan was to construct ten monster floating batteries of such capacity that they should carry the heaviest artillery, and so made and defended that they could be neither sunk nor burnt. Loud was the clangour of hammer and saw, and, as the secret could not be long preserved, equally busy was the garrison within, preparing furnaces, and laying ready huge piles of balls, to be discharged red-hot at these machines as soon as they arrived. To constitute the intended batteries, ten large ships of from six hundred to one thousand four hundred tons burden were cut down, and made bombproof on the top. They were to be prevented from sinking by the enormous thickness of the timber in their bottoms, and their sides, which were to be six or seven feet thick, bolted, and covered with raw hides. They were to be rendered more buoyant by thicknesses of cork208, and the interstices were to be filled with wet sand to prevent combustion209. There were to be plentiful210 supplies, by means of pumps, pipes, and cisterns211, of water, everywhere, to put out fire, for they seem to have been aware of the burning balls that were being prepared for them.
As a rumour212 of the approaching visit of Lord Howe had reached the Spanish camp, all was in haste to anticipate his arrival, and take the huge fortress before he could succour it. Accordingly the great united fleet of Spain and France, which so lately had paraded in the English Channel, sailed into Algeciras Bay, and on the 13th of September the floating batteries were hauled out by a number of the ships, and anchored at regular distances, within six hundred yards of the English works. Whilst this extraordinary armada was approaching and disposing itself, tremendous fire was kept up from the land, with three hundred long guns and mortars213, to divert the attention of the garrison; but old General Elliot was ready with his red-hot balls, and, the moment the floating batteries came within gunshot distance, he poured into them a most destructive fire-hail. The Spaniards, notwithstanding, placed and secured their monster machines in a very short time, and then four hundred cannon from land and sea played on the old rock simultaneously214 and incessantly. For some time the hot balls appeared to do no damage. The timbers, being of green wood, closed up after the balls, and so prevented their immediate ignition. In other cases, where smoke appeared, the water-engines dashed in deluges215, and extinguished the nascent216 fire. But presently the fire from the batteries slackened; it was discovered that the balls—which had many of them pierced into the timbers three feet deep—were doing their work. The floating battery commanded by the Prince of Nassau, on board of which was also the engineer, D'Arcon, himself, was found smoking on the side facing the rock, at two o'clock in the day. No water could reach the seat of mischief, and by seven o'clock it had become so extensive as to cause the firing to cease, and to turn the thoughts of all to endeavours for escape. Rockets were thrown up as signals for the vessels to come up and take off the crews. But this was found impracticable. The garrison actually rained deluges of fire, and all approach to the monster machines was cut off. No vessel could draw near, except at the penalty of instant destruction. For four more hours the vaunted floating batteries remained exposed to the pitiless pelting217 of the garrison. Before midnight, the Talla Piedra, the greatest of the monster machines, and the flagship, Pastora, at her side, were in full flame, and by their light the indefatigable218 Elliot could see, with the more precision, to point his guns. Seven of the ten floating machines were now on fire; the guns aboard them had entirely219 ceased, and those on land, as if struck with wonder and despair, had become silent too.
It might have been imagined that this magnificent and destructive repulse would have convinced the allies that the siege was hopeless, but they were pretty well informed that General Elliot had well nigh exhausted his ammunition in this prodigal220 death-shower, and they had still their great combined fleet, snug221 in the narrow bay, with scouts222 in the Strait to prevent the carrying in of supplies. But on the 24th of September news arrived at Madrid that the fleet of Lord Howe was under weigh for Gibraltar. Howe's fleet of thirty-four sail-of-the-line, six frigates, and three fire-ships, though in the neighbourhood of one of fifty sail-of-the-line, besides a number of frigates and smaller vessels, managed to get into the bay of Gibraltar all safe, amid the wildest acclamations of soldiers and inhabitants. By the 18th of October all the store-ships had discharged their cargoes223, and had passed through the Strait, and on the 19th Lord Howe followed them with his fleet. The enemy's fleet then came out after him, and the next day they were in the open ocean, and Howe proceeded to their leeward to receive them. Some of their vessels had suffered[296] in the late gales224, but they had still at least forty-four sail to Howe's thirty-four, and, having the weather-gauge, had every advantage. But after a partial firing, in which they received great damage from Howe, they hauled off and got into Cadiz bay. Howe, then dispatching part of his fleet to the West Indies and a second squadron to the Irish coast, returned home himself. The news of the grand defence of Gibraltar produced a wonderful rejoicing in England; thanks were voted by Parliament to the officers and privates of the brave garrison; General Elliot was invested with the Order of the Bath on the king's bastion in sight of the works which he had preserved, and on his return, in 1787, at the age of seventy, he was created a Peer as Lord Heathfield of Gibraltar.
With these superb demonstrations225 on the part of England terminated the war. Her enemies discovered that her hoped-for fall was yet far off, and were much more inclined to listen to overtures226 of peace, of which they were now all in great need. These negotiations had been begun by Fox immediately on the accession of the Rockingham Ministry to office. Unfortunately the division of work between two Secretaries of State entailed227 a double negotiation7. To Fox as Secretary of Foreign Affairs fell the arrangements for peace with France and Spain and Holland, to Lord Shelburne as Colonial Secretary fell all arrangements connected with the colonies, that is, with the United States. It was most important that the two Ministers should be in close accord. Unfortunately their views differed widely. Fox was for the immediate recognition of the independence of America; Shelburne urged that to give independence at once was to throw away a trump228 card. Further, Mr. Oswald, Shelburne's agent, was duped by Franklin into accepting from him a paper, in which the surrender of Canada was laid down as a basis of peace. This paper Shelburne probably showed to the king, but, with great duplicity, refrained from mentioning its existence to his colleagues. On the 8th of May Mr. Thomas Grenville, Fox's agent, arrived at Paris, and negotiations were begun in real earnest. But the na?ve confession229 of Oswald that peace was absolutely necessary to England greatly hampered230 his efforts, and in a conversation with Lord Shelburne's envoy231 the existence of the Canada paper leaked out. Fox was naturally furious, but the majority of the Cabinet were opposed to him, and voted against his demand for the immediate recognition of American independence. He only refrained from resigning because he would not embitter232 Lord Rockingham's last moments in the world. Lord Shelburne became Premier in July.
Upon the formation of the Shelburne Cabinet, and the news of Rodney's victory over De Grasse, the negotiations were still continued, Mr. Grenville only being recalled, and Mr. Alleyne Fitzherbert, afterwards Lord St. Helens, being put in his place. France, Spain, Holland, were all groaning233 under the cost and disasters of the war, yet keeping up an air of indifference, in order to enhance their demands. The Americans were more decided234, for they were stimulated by the accounts of the wretched condition of affairs at home. It was represented to Franklin by Congress, that, however France or Spain might delay proposals for peace, it was necessary for the United States. The position of Franklin, nevertheless, was extremely difficult. There was the treaty of alliance between France and the States of 1778, strictly235 stipulating236 that neither party should conclude either peace or truce237 without the other. What added to the difficulty was, that France had, within the last two years, shown an unusual interest and activity of assistance. Franklin, in order to strengthen his hands for the important crisis, requested that other commissioners238 might be sent to Paris; and John Jay quickly arrived from Spain, John Adams from Holland, and Henry Laurens from London. The American Commissioners soon became strongly impressed with the sentiment that France and Spain were keeping back a peace solely239 for their own objects; and this was confirmed by a letter of M. de Marbois, the secretary of the French legation at Philadelphia, which had been seized by an English cruiser, and had been laid by Mr. Fitzherbert before them. This letter appeared to be part of a diplomatic correspondence between the French Minister, Vergennes, and the French Minister in America, which threw contempt on the claim which America set up to a share of the Newfoundland fisheries. It created a strong belief that France was endeavouring to keep America in some degree dependent on her; and Jay and Adams were extremely incensed240 at Vergennes, and not only accused Franklin of being blindly subservient241 to the French Court, but it made them resolve that no time should be lost in effecting a separate treaty. Vergennes contended for the rights of the Indian nations between the Alleghanies and the Mississippi, and of Spain on the lower Mississippi, and this the American Commissioners perceived to be an attempt to divide[297] and weaken their territory. A private and earnest negotiation for peace with England was therefore entered upon as soon as a severe illness of Franklin permitted.
MAP OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE TIME WHEN THEY GAINED THEIR INDEPENDENCE.
[See larger version]
There was no difficulty in these negotiations as to the full and entire recognition of the independence of the States. The difficult points were but two—one regarding the fishery, and the other regarding the interests of the Royalists or Tories. The British Commissioners stood out strongly for the free permission of all who had been engaged in the war on the English side to return to their homes, and for the restitution242 of all property confiscated in consequence of such partisanship243. The American Commissioners endeavoured to meet this demand by saying the recommendations of Congress would have all the effect that the English proposed. This the Commissioners regarded as so many words, and they insisted so determinedly244 on this head, that it appeared likely the negotiation would be broken off altogether. At last Franklin said they would consent to allow for all losses suffered by the Royalists, on condition that a debtor245 and a creditor246 account was opened, and recompense made for the damages done by the Royalists on the other side; commissioners to be appointed for the purpose of settling all those claims. The English envoys247 saw at once that this was a deception248, that there would be no meeting, or no use in meeting, and they therefore abandoned the point; and the question of the fishing being in part conceded, the provisional articles were signed on the 30th of November, by the four American Commissioners on the one side, and by Mr. Oswald on the other. In the preamble249 it was stated[298] that these articles were to be inserted in, and to constitute, a treaty of peace, but that the treaty was not to be concluded until the terms of peace had also been settled with France and Spain.
This proviso, however, by no means affected250 the treaty with America. This secret treaty was made binding251 and effectual so far as America and England were concerned. The first article acknowledged fully the independence of the United States. The second fixed252 their boundaries, much to the satisfaction of the Americans; and liberty was secured to them to fish on the banks of Newfoundland, in the Gulf253 of St. Lawrence, and wherever they had been accustomed to fish, but not to dry the fish on any of the king's settled dominions254 in America. By the fourth, fifth, and sixth articles it was engaged for Congress that it should earnestly recommend to the several Legislatures to provide for the restitution of all estates belonging to real British subjects who had not borne arms against the Americans. All other persons were to be allowed to go to any of the States and remain there for the settlement of their affairs. Congress also engaged to recommend the restitution of confiscated estates on the repayment255 of the sums for which they had been sold; and no impediments were to be put in the way of recovering real debts. All further confiscations and prosecutions256 were to cease. By the seventh and eighth articles the King of England engaged to withdraw his fleets and armies without causing any destruction of property, or carrying away any negro slaves. By these articles, the navigation of the Mississippi, from its source to the ocean, was to remain for ever free and open to both parties. If West Florida happened to be in the possession of Britain at the termination of a general peace, a secret article determined its boundaries.
Such were the conditions on which this great contest was finally terminated. The Americans clearly had matters almost entirely their own way, for the English were desirous that everything should now be done to conciliate their very positive and by no means modest kinsmen257, the citizens of the United States. It was, in truth, desirable to remove as much as possible the rancour of the American mind, by concessions which England could well afford, so as not to throw them wholly into the arms of France. The conditions which the Americans, on their part, conceded to the unfortunate Royalists consisted entirely of recommendations from Congress to the individual States, and when it was recollected258 how little regard they had paid to any engagements into which they had entered during the war—with General Burgoyne, for example—the English negotiators felt, as they consented to these articles, that, so far, they would prove a mere dead letter. They could only console themselves with the thought that they would have protected the unhappy Royalists, whom Franklin and his colleagues bitterly and vindictively259 continued to designate as traitors260. Franklin showed, on this occasion, that he had never forgotten the just chastisement261 which Wedderburn had inflicted on him before the Privy Council for his concern in the purloining262 of the private papers of Mr. Thomas Whateley, in 1774. On that occasion, he laid aside the velvet263 court suit, in which he appeared before the Council, and never put it on till now, when he appeared in it at the signing of the Treaty of Independence.
On the 5th of December Parliament met, and the king, though not yet able to announce the signing of the provisional treaty with France and America, intimated pretty plainly the approach of that fact. Indeed, Lord Shelburne had addressed a letter to the Lord Mayor of London eight days before the articles with America were actually signed, that this event was so near at hand that Parliament would be prorogued264 from the time fixed for its meeting, the 26th of November, to the 5th of December. It was, indeed, hoped that by that day the preliminaries with France and Spain would be signed too. This not being so, the king could only declare that conclusion as all but certain.
This announcement drew from the Opposition a torrent265 of abuse of Ministers, who, in reality, had only been carrying out the very measure which they had long recommended, and which Fox, in particular, had been seriously endeavouring to accomplish whilst in office. Their censures266 appeared to arise rather from the fact that the war was ended without their mediation171 than from anything else. Fox upbraided267 Lord Shelburne with having once said that, when the independence of America should be admitted, the sun of England would have set. Yet this had been the opinion not of Lord Shelburne merely, but of numbers who now saw reason to doubt that gloomy view of things, and there was the less reason for Fox to throw this in the face of the Prime Minister, as he had been himself, whilst his colleague, earnestly labouring with him for that end. Still he was naturally sore[299] from Shelburne's successful intrigues268 against his diplomacy269. On the 18th of December he moved for copies of such parts of the provisional treaty as related to American independence; but in this he was supported by only forty-six members.
On the 26th the Houses adjourned for a month, for the Christmas recess, and during this time the treaties with France and Spain made rapid progress. The fact of America being now withdrawn270 from the quarrel, coupled with the signs of returning vigour272 in England—Rodney's great victory and the astonishing defence of Gibraltar—acted as a wonderful stimulant273 to pacification274. Spain still clung fondly to the hope of receiving back Gibraltar, and this hope was for some time encouraged by the apparent readiness of Lord Shelburne to comply with the desire, as Chatham and Lord Stanhope had done before. But no sooner was this question mooted275 in the House of Commons than the public voice denounced it so energetically, that it was at once abandoned. On the 20th of January, 1783, Mr. Fitzherbert signed, at Versailles, the preliminaries of peace with the Comte de Vergennes, on the part of France, and with D'Aranda, on the part of Spain. By the treaty with France, the right of fishing off the coast of Newfoundland and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence was restored, as granted by the Treaty of Utrecht; but the limits were more accurately276 defined. The islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon, on the coast of Newfoundland, were ceded6 for drying of fish. In the West Indies, England ceded Tobago, which France had taken, and restored St. Lucia, but received back again Grenada, St. Vincent, Dominica, St. Kitt's, Nevis, and Montserrat. In Africa, England gave up the river Senegal and the island of Goree, but retained Fort St. James and the river Gambia. In India, the French were allowed to recover Pondicherry and Chandernagore, with the right to fortify277 the latter, and to carry on their usual commerce. They regained278 also Mahé and the factory of Surat, with their former privileges. The articles in the Treaty of Utrecht, regarding the demolition279 of the fortifications of Dunkirk, were abrogated280. Spain was allowed to retain Minorca and both the Floridas, but she agreed to restore Providence and the Bahamas. The latter, however, had already been retaken by us. She granted to England the right of cutting logwood in Honduras, but without the privilege of erecting281 forts or stock-houses, which rendered the concession worthless, for it had always been found that without these it was impossible to carry on the trade. With the Dutch a truce was made on the basis of mutual282 restoration, except as concerned the town of Negapatam, which Holland ceded. The preliminaries, however, were not settled till nearly eight months afterwards.
It was not to be wondered at that when, on the 24th of January, the preliminaries of peace were laid on the tables of the two Houses, there should be a violent denunciation of the large concessions made by Ministers. Spain had been granted better terms than in any treaty since that of St. Quentin. She had obtained the most desirable island of Minorca, with the finest port on the Mediterranean283. She had got the Floridas, and had given up scarcely anything, whilst, had the British, now freed from the dead weight of America, pursued the war against her, she must soon have lost most of her valuable insular284 colonies. France had given up more, but she recovered very important territories which she had lost, and especially her settlements of Pondicherry and Chandernagore, in the East Indies; but America had conceded nothing, and yet had been allowed to determine her own frontier, and to share the benefits of the fishing all round our own Transatlantic coasts.
A new and surprising phenomenon was discovered in the attacks upon Ministers for these concessions: Fox and North were in coalition! Fox, who so lately had declared North and his colleagues men "void of every principle of honour and honesty," and who would consent, should he ever make terms with them, to be called "the most infamous285 of mankind," now as warmly declared that he had ever found Lord North—this man void of honour and honesty—a man always "open and sincere as a friend, honourable and manly286 as an enemy, above practising subterfuges287, tricks, and stratagems288." Lord North, on his side, repaid the compliments of Fox, growing enthusiastic on the genius, eloquence, and generous nature of that statesman. "While I admire the vast extent of his understanding," exclaimed North, "I can rely on the goodness of his heart." The coalition was looked upon with disfavour, but it was justified289 to a considerable extent during the debate on the peace. Lord John Cavendish truly represented that France and Spain were on the verge9 of ruin; that Holland was in an exhausted and helpless condition; and that as for America, it was in the very gulf of destitution290, the people refusing to pay the taxes ordered by[300] Congress for the continuance of the war. And it was to such defeated and demolished291 enemies that Ministers had conceded almost everything they had asked. Lord North turned more particularly to the concession made to the French in the East Indies. It was in that quarter, he said, that he looked for a consolidated292 and expanding empire, calculated to recompense us, and more than recompense us, for the loss of America. From that splendid continent we had completely driven the French, and the soundest policy dictated293 their continued firm exclusion294 from it. Yet here had Ministers most fatally readmitted them, to renew their old plots and alliances against us, by which they would to a certainty continue to harass295, thwart296, and weaken us, till we once more went through the ruinous and sanguinary process of expulsion. He was equally severe on the surrender of Minorca and the Floridas to Spain, and the admission of the unconceding, unconciliating Americans to our own proper fishing grounds. Fox called on Ministers to produce the treaty which he had sketched297 a few months before, and to see what very different terms he had demanded, and would have exacted. That the sense of the House went with these sentiments was shown by both the amendments298 of the Coalition being carried by a majority of sixteen. Lord John Cavendish moved another resolution strongly condemning299 the terms of the treaty, but consented that the peace now made should remain inviolate300. This was also carried, by a majority of seventeen, being two hundred and seven votes against one hundred and ninety.
This majority of the Coalition compelled Lord Shelburne to resign; but the rest of the Administration remained in their places, in the hope that Pitt would now take the Premiership. In fact, the king, on the 24th of February, sent for Pitt and proposed this to him; but Pitt was too sensible of the impossibility of maintaining himself against the present combination of parties. The next day Dundas moved and carried an adjournment for three days, to give time for the arrangement of a new Cabinet. Pitt continued to persist in declining to take the Premiership, and on the 2nd or 3rd of March the king sent for Lord North. His proposal was that North should resume the management of affairs; but North insisted on bringing in his new friends, and to that the king objected. Matters remained in this impracticable condition till the 12th, when the king sent for North, and proposed that the Duke of Portland should be asked to form an Administration; but this did not at all advance matters, for Portland was equally determined with North to maintain the Coalition, and the king was resolved to have nothing to do with Fox, whilst Fox was equally determined not to admit the king's friend, Lord Stormont, to any Cabinet of which he was a member. On the 31st the announcement was made that Pitt had resigned, and that the king was prepared to submit to the terms of the Coalition. George, with deep and inward groans301, submitted himself once more to the slavery of the great Whig houses, and, as some small recompense, the Coalition admitted Lord Stormont to a place in the Cabinet.
The new Administration arranged itself as follows:—The Duke of Portland, First Lord of the Treasury; Lord North, Home Secretary; Fox, Secretary for Foreign Affairs; the Earl of Carlisle, Privy Seal; Lord John Cavendish, again Chancellor of the Exchequer; Admiral Lord Keppel, the head of the Admiralty again; Lord Stormont, President of the Council; the great stumbling block, Thurlow, removed from the Woolsack, and the Great Seal put into commission; Burke again Paymaster of the Forces, and his brother Richard as Secretary to the Treasury in conjunction with Sheridan. Such was this strange and medley302 association, well deserving Burke's own description of a former Administration, as of a strange assemblage of creatures, "all pigging together in one truckle-bed." Those who formed exclusively the Cabinet were Portland, North, Fox, Cavendish, Carlisle, Keppel, and Stormont, so that the great Whigs had taken care again to shut out Burke, who was only a man of genius. Such an incongruous company could not long hold together. The king did not conceal303 his indignation at seeing Fox in office; the whole Court openly expressed its loathing304 of the anomalous305 union; the country had no confidence in it; Fox felt that he had wounded his popularity by his sudden and violent change.
At first the course of affairs was not eventful. On the 7th of May Pitt moved a series of resolutions as the basis of a Bill for reform of Parliament. The main features of this scheme were those of taking measures against bribery306 and corruption161; the disfranchisement of boroughs when a majority of the electors was proved corrupt160; and the addition of a hundred new members to the House of Commons, nearly all of them from the counties, except an additional member or two from the metropolis307.
On the 23rd of June the king sent down a message to the Commons, recommending them to[301] take into consideration a separate establishment for the Prince of Wales, who had arrived at the age of twenty-one. This young man, whose whole career proved to be one of reckless extravagance and dissipation, was already notorious for his debauched habits, and for his fast accumulating debts. He was a great companion of Fox, and the gambling308 roués amongst whom that grand orator309 but spendthrift man was accustomed to spend his time and money, and therefore, as a pet of this Coalition Ministry, the Duke of Portland proposed to grant him one hundred thousand pounds a year. The king, alarmed at the torrent of extravagance and vice73 which such an income was certain to produce in the prince's career, declared that he could not consent to burden his people, and encourage the prince's habits of expense, by such an allowance. He therefore requested that the grant should amount only to fifty thousand pounds a year, paid out of the Civil List, and fifty thousand pounds as an outfit310 from Parliamentary funds. The Ministers were compelled to limit themselves to this, though the saving was merely nominal311, for the debts on the Civil List were again fast accumulating, and the prince was not at all likely to hesitate to apply to Parliament to wipe off his debts, as well as his father's when they became troublesome to him. Resenting, however, the restraint attempted to be put upon him by his father, the prince the more closely connected himself with Fox and his party, and the country was again scandalised by the repetition of the scenes enacted312 when Frederick, Prince of Wales, father of George III., was the opponent of his own father, George II., and the associate of his opponents. Such, indeed, had been the family divisions in every reign since the Hanoverian succession. On the 16th of July Parliament was prorogued.
THE MANSION313 HOUSE, LONDON, IN 1760.
[See larger version]
The regathering of Parliament, on the 11th of November, was distinguished by two circumstances of very unequal interest. The Prince of Wales, having arrived at his majority, took his seat as Duke of Cornwall, as it was well known, intending to vote for a great measure which Fox was introducing regarding India. We shall now almost immediately enter on the narration314 of the[302] important events which had been transpiring315 in India during the American war. It is sufficient here to observe that these were of a nature to give the most serious concern and alarm to all well-wishers of the country, and of the unfortunate natives of that magnificent peninsula. Fox's measure for the reform and restraint of the East India Company was comprehended in two Bills, the first proposing to vest the affairs of the Company in the hands of sixteen directors, seven of them to be appointed by Parliament, and afterwards sanctioned by the Crown, and nine of them to be elected by the holders316 of stock. These were to remain in office four years; the seven Parliament nominees317 to be invested with the management of the territorial318 possessions and revenues of the Company; the nine additional to conduct the commercial affairs of the Company under the seven chief directors; and both classes of directors to be subject to removal at the option of the king, on an address for the purpose from either House of Parliament. The second Bill related principally to the powers to be vested in the Governor-General and Council, and their treatment of the natives.
The Bills were highly necessary, and, on the whole, well calculated to nip in the bud those ever-growing abuses of India and its hundred millions of people which, some seventy years later, compelled Government to take the control out of the hands of a mere trading company, whose only object was to coin as much money as possible out of the country and the folk. But it needed no sagacity to see that the means of defeat lay on the very surface of these Bills. Those whose sordid319 interests were attacked had only to point to the fact that Parliament, and not the Crown, was to be the governing party under these Bills, in order to secure their rejection320. This was quickly done through a most ready agent. Thurlow had been removed by the Ministry from the Woolsack, where he had remained as a steady opponent of all the measures of his colleagues; and it required but a hint from the India House, and he was at the ear of the king. Nothing was easier than for Thurlow to inspire George III. with a deep jealousy of the measure, as aiming at putting the whole government of India into the hands of Parliament and of Ministers, and the effect was soon seen.
Fox introduced his first Bill on the 20th of November. All went smoothly321, and the second reading was ordered for that day week. Then the storm burst. Mr. Grenville (afterwards Lord Grenville) described the Bill as a scheme to put the Company into the hands of Ministers, and to annihilate322 the prerogatives323 of the Crown at the same time. He denounced it as one of the most daring and dangerous attempts that had ever been brought into that House. He moved that it should lie over till after Christmas, and there was a strong phalanx ready to support him. Grenville did not press the motion to a division, and the Bill was read a second time on the 27th, when a vehement131 and long debate took place. Pitt put forth325 his whole strength against it, Fox for it, and it was carried by two hundred and twenty-nine votes against one hundred and twenty. On the 1st of December it was moved that the Bill be committed, when the Opposition was equally determined. On this occasion Burke, who had made himself profoundly acquainted with Indian affairs, took the lead, and delivered one of his very finest speeches, full of information and eloquence. Pitt resisted the going into Committee with all his power, and pledged himself, if the House would throw out the Bill, to bring in another just as efficacious, and at the same time devoid326 of its danger. The debate, like the former one, did not close till half-past four in the morning, and then it was with a triumphant majority of two hundred and seventeen against one hundred and three. The Bill, thus carried by such majorities through the Commons, was carried up to the Lords, on the 9th of December, by Fox, accompanied by a numerous body of the Commoners, and it was considered as certain of passing there; but the king and his party, exasperated327 at the resolute conduct of the Commons, had gone to such lengths to quash the Bill in the Lords as are rarely resorted to by the Crown. As in the Lower House, so here, it was allowed to be read the first time without dividing; but it was attacked with an ominous328 solemnity by Thurlow, the Duke of Richmond, and Lord Temple, who, since his recall from the Lord-Lieutenancy of Ireland, had thrown himself into the Opposition with peculiar329 vivacity330. It was known that he had been frequently closeted with the king of late, and he bluntly declared the Bill infamous. As a matter of fact, he had urged the king to use his personal influence with the House of Lords. Thurlow went further, and, fixing one of his most solemn glances on the Prince of Wales, who was sitting in the House to vote for the Bill, declared that if this measure passed, the crown of England would not be worth wearing;[303] and that if the king allowed it to become law, he would, in fact, have taken it from his head and put it on that of Mr. Fox. On the 15th, when the Bill was proposed for the second reading, the royal proceedings331 against it were brought at once to light. The Duke of Portland rose and said, before going into the question, he was bound to notice a report which was confidently in circulation, and which, if true, vitally affected the constitution of the country. This was no less than that the king had written a note to Lord Temple, stating that "his Majesty would deem those who voted for the Bill not only not his friends, but his enemies; and that if Lord Temple could put this into still stronger language, he had full authority to do so."
The Duke of Richmond read a paragraph from a newspaper in which the report was stated, naming Lord Temple without any disguise. On this Temple rose, and admitted that he had given certain advice to the king, but would neither admit nor deny that it was of the kind intimated in the report. That the rumour was founded on truth, however, was immediately shown by the division. Numbers of lords who had promised Ministers to vote for the Bill withdrew their support; the Prince of Wales declined voting; and the Opposition carried a resolution for adjournment till the next day, in order to hear evidence in defence of the East India Company. It was clear that the Bill had received its death-blow, and would never pass the Lords after this expression of the royal will, and on the 17th of December it was lost by nineteen votes.
Fox was very indignant, and made no scruple332 of attributing the conduct of the king, not to mere report, but to fact. "There is," he said, "a written record to be produced. This letter is not to be put in the balance with the lie of the day;" whereupon he pulled from his pocket a copy of the note said to have been written by the king to Lord Temple. When he sat down, Mr. Grenville rose and stated that he had taken down the words read as the king's note, and had shown them to his relative, Lord Temple, who had authorised him to say that such words had never been made use of by him. But Fox demanded whether Lord Temple had not used words to that effect, and Grenville was silent. Fox continued in a very fierce strain, denouncing back-stairs lords and bedchamber politicians, and declared that the best-meant and best-concerted plans of Ministers were subject to the blasting influence of a villainous whisper. He added that he could not continue in office any longer consistently either with his own honour or the interests of the nation. He felt that he was goaded333 to it, and upbraided for not resigning instantly; but a very honourable majority of that House stood pledged to a great measure, and Ministers were equally bound not to abandon the affairs of State in the midst of so much anarchy334. These last words, and the division, which was nearly two to one in favour of Ministers, left it doubtful, after all, whether Fox and his colleagues would resign. As such language, however, could not be used by Ministers with impunity335, and a dissolution of the Cabinet was probable, Erskine moved a resolution, pledging the House to persevere336 in the endeavour to remedy the abuses in the government of India, and declaring "that this House will consider as an enemy to this country any person who shall presume to advise his Majesty to prevent, or in any manner interrupt, the discharge of this important duty." All strangers were excluded, but it was ascertained337 that the motion was severely censured338 as an invasion of the king's prerogative324; yet the resolution was carried by one hundred and forty-seven votes against seventy-three.
Strong as was the majority of Ministers, however, the king did not wait for their resigning. The day after this debate (Thursday, December 18th), the king sent, at twelve o'clock at night, to Fox and Lord North an order to surrender their seals of office to their Under-Secretaries, as a personal interview, in the circumstances, would be disagreeable. Fox instantly delivered up his; but Lord North was already in bed, and had entrusted339 his seal to his son, Colonel North, who could not be found for some time. The Seals were then delivered to Lord Temple, who, on the following day, sent letters of dismissal to all the other members of the coalition Cabinet. Pitt, though in his twenty-fifth year only, was appointed first Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer, and on him devolved the duty of forming a new Administration. Earl Gower was nominated President of the Council, and Lord Temple one of the Secretaries of State. When the House of Commons met in the afternoon, Fox imagined, from a motion of Dundas to proceed to business without the usual adjournment on Saturday, that it was the object of the new party to pass certain money Bills, and then resort to a dissolution. Fox opposed the motion, declaring that a dissolution at this moment would produce infinite damage to[304] the service of the nation, and that, should it take place in order to suit the convenience of an ambitious young man (meaning Pitt), he would, immediately on the meeting of the new House, move for an inquiry into the authors and advisers340 of it, in order to bring them to punishment. This caused Lord Temple, who had occasioned the breaking up of the Coalition, to resign again immediately, declaring that he preferred meeting any aspersions upon him in his private and individual capacity. This certainly removed a great danger from his colleagues, although it rendered the task of his friend and relative, Pitt, still more difficult, in having to form an Administration alone. The Ministry was then filled up thus:—Lord Sydney, Secretary of State for the Home Department; the Marquis of Carmarthen for the Foreign; the Duke of Rutland, Lord Privy Seal; Lord Gower became President of the Council; the Duke of Richmond, Master-General of the Ordnance; Lord Thurlow again Chancellor; Lord Howe, First Lord of the Admiralty. With the exception of Pitt, the whole of the Cabinet was drawn271 from the House of Lords. When the Commons met, on the 22nd, Mr. Bankes said he was authorised by Mr. Pitt, who was not in the House, a new writ100 for Appleby being moved for on his appointment to office, to say that he had no intention to advise a dissolution. His Majesty, on the 24th of December, having also assured the House that he would not interrupt their meeting after the recess by either prorogation341 or dissolution, the House adjourned till the 12th of January, 1784.
When Parliament reassembled, Fox seized the very earliest moment to address the Chair and occupy the attention of the House. He rose at the unusually early hour of half-past two o'clock in the day, before the newly returned members had taken their oaths. Pitt himself was in this predicament, but, as soon as he had taken his oath, he rose to speak; but Fox contended that he was already in possession of the House, and, though Pitt announced that he had a message from the king, Fox persisted, and moved that the House should go into committee on the state of the nation. This allowed Pitt to speak, who declared that he had no objection to the committee; but he thought it more advisable to go into the question of India, on which subject he proposed to introduce a Bill. He then made some sharp remarks on the conduct of Fox in thus seizing, by artifice342, a precedence in speaking, and on the petulance343 and clamour which the Opposition had displayed, and on the violent and unprecedented344 nature of their conduct, by which they hoped to inflame345 the spirit of the country and excite unnecessary jealousies346. In truth, Fox and his party were now running a most unwise career. Possessed347 of a large majority, they were indignant that the king should have dismissed them, and thought that they could outvote the new Ministry, and drive them again from office. They had, no doubt, such a majority; but, at the same time, they had the king resolute against them. They had insulted him by their violent denunciations of his letter, and they had not, in their anger, the discernment to perceive that not only would this be made use of by their opponents to injure them, both in Parliament and out of it, but their proceeding with so much heat and violence was calculated to make them appear factious—more concerned for their places than for the interests of the country. All this took place; the king and Ministry saw how all this would operate, and calmly awaited its effects. Fox and his party were, however, blind to the signs of the times, and carried no less than five resolutions against the Government.
When the House met again, Pitt moved for leave to bring in his Bill for the better government and management of the affairs of the East India Company. He was aware, he said, how certain men would triumph when he informed them that he had based his intended measures on the resolutions of the proprietors348 of India stock. He was so miserably349 irresolute350, he said, as not to venture on a Bill founded on violence and disfranchisement. He was so weak as to pay respect to chartered rights; and he had not disdained351, in proposing a new system of government, to consult those who had the greatest interest in the matter, as well as the most experience in it. These were all hard hits at Fox and his party. In his Bill he went on the principle of placing the commerce of India chiefly under the control of the Company itself; but the civil and military government, he admitted, required some other control than that of the Company, yet even this, in his opinion, ought to be established in accordance with the convictions of the Company. In truth, it was a Bill rather calculated to win the good will of the East India Company than to reform the abuses of that body and to protect the interests of the natives. Fox, with as much truth as personal feeling, designated the Bill as the wisdom of an individual opposed to the collective wisdom of the Commons of England.
[305]
The Bill was suffered to pass the second reading, but was thrown out, on the motion of its being committed, by two hundred and twenty-two against two hundred and fourteen. Fox then gave notice of his intention of bringing in a new Bill of his own on India, and demanded to know from the Ministers whether he might expect to proceed in security with it, or whether the House would be dissolved. Pitt did not answer; the question was repeated by other members, but Pitt continued silent, till General Conway said it was a new thing to see a Minister sitting in sulky silence, and refusing to satisfy the reasonable desires of the House. This brought out Pitt with an indignant denial; but he preserved silence as to the probability of a dissolution.
CHARLES JAMES FOX. (After the portrait by Sir Joshua Reynolds.)
[See larger version]
These party tactics were continued with unwonted heat by the Opposition on all occasions, till the House adjourned for three days, to meet again on the 29th, the Opposition revelling in large majorities, though they were aware that both the king and the House of Lords were adverse352 to them. But the country was also growing weary of this unsatisfactory position of things, and began to sympathise with the great patience of Pitt rather than the tumultuous conduct of Fox and his friends. Pitt, however, was strong in the assurance of the adhesion of the Crown and the peerage, and saw unmistakable signs of revulsion in the feeling of the public. The majorities of the Commons were becoming every time less, and on the 16th of February the Corporation of London had presented a strongly expressed address to the king, declaring its approval of the late dismissal of Ministers, and its opinion that the India Bill of Fox was an encroachment353 on the[306] prerogative of the Crown. Dr. Johnson also regarded it as a contest whether the nation should be ruled by the sceptre of George III. or by the tongue of Mr. Fox.
Fox saw the growing change with alarm. He saw that all their resolutions and addresses produced no effect on the Ministerial party; and he did not dare to go further and pass a Bill, either legislative or declaratory, for he felt that the Lords would throw it out; and to stop the supplies, or delay the Mutiny Bill would probably disgust and annihilate the very majority on which he depended. In these circumstances, he probably saw with satisfaction an attempt at coalition. Mr. Grosvenor, the member for Chester, during the three days of the adjournment, called a meeting of members of both parties for the purpose of seeing whether a coalition could not be formed, and thus put an end to this violent contest. About seventy members met, and an address to the Duke of Portland and Mr. Pitt was signed by fifty-four. Pitt expressed his readiness to co-operate in such a plan, but the Duke of Portland declared that the first indispensable step towards such a measure must be the resignation of Ministers. This put an end to all hope of success.
The feelings of the constituencies were undergoing a speedy change, and the fact was now being rapidly proved. For three months, whilst the Opposition in the House of Commons were exulting354 on their majority, the majority amongst the people was sliding from them; and, whilst they were straining every nerve to prevent the dissolution of Parliament, they were only more securely preparing their own fall, for Pitt and the Government had been zealously at work undermining them. The nation was pleased at his bravery, and at his disinterestedness in refusing the sinecure146 of the Clerkship of the Pells, though his private means were scarcely £300 a year.
From the 11th of February to the 1st of March the struggle went on, many endeavours being made, but without effect, to come to an agreement between the parties. On the last day Fox moved that an Address be carried up to the king by the whole House, representing the violence done to the Constitution by a Minister retaining his place after a vote of want of confidence by the Commons, and insisting strongly on the right and duty of that House to advise his Majesty on the exercise of his prerogative. Pitt replied that, by attempting to force the king to decide contrary to his judgment355, they were placing the sceptre under the mace356; but the resolution was carried by a majority, though of twelve only, and on the 4th the Address was carried up, when the king repeated that his sentiments remained the same. Fox, on the return of the House, moved that this answer should not be taken into consideration before the 8th, and till then the Mutiny Bill should remain in abeyance357. His object was to stave off a dissolution until the 25th, when the Mutiny Bill expired. By refusing to renew it, he hoped to force his rival to resign. The House on the 8th was excessively crowded, for a very warm debate was anticipated. When it came to divide about midnight, Fox was found to have carried his resolution, but only by a majority of one. This was the climax358 of defeat. The once triumphant Opposition saw that all was over with them, and they gave up the contest.
The supplies and the Mutiny Bill were now passed without much difficulty, but Ministers did not venture to introduce an Appropriation359 Bill. On the 23rd, Lord North, stating that the dissolution of Parliament was confidently asserted out of doors, declared that such a dissolution, without passing an Appropriation Bill, would be an unparalleled insult to the House. He expressed his astonishment that the Minister did not condescend360 to utter a syllable361 on the subject of the proposed change. Pitt, now confident of his position, replied that gentlemen might ask as many questions as they pleased; that he had adopted a course which was advantageous362 to the country, and did not feel bound to enter then into any explanations. All mystery, however, was cleared up the next day, for the king went down to the House of Lords and prorogued Parliament, announcing that he felt it his duty to the Constitution and the country to convoke363 a new Parliament. Accordingly, on the following day, the 25th of March, he dissolved Parliament by proclamation.
When the new Parliament met, on the 18th of May, it was seen how completely Fox and North had destroyed their prestige by their late factious conduct, and how entirely Pitt had made himself master of the situation. His patience and cool policy under the tempestuous assaults of the Opposition had given the country a wonderful confidence in him. One party extolled364 him as the staunch defender365 of the prerogative, another as the champion of reform and enemy of aristocratic influence. Not less than one hundred and sixty of the supporters of the late Coalition Ministry had been rejected at the elections, and they were held up to ridicule366 as "Fox's Martyrs."
点击收听单词发音
1 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ministry | |
n.(政府的)部;牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 premier | |
adj.首要的;n.总理,首相 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 ceded | |
v.让给,割让,放弃( cede的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 negotiation | |
n.谈判,协商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 verge | |
n.边,边缘;v.接近,濒临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 factious | |
adj.好搞宗派活动的,派系的,好争论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 divulge | |
v.泄漏(秘密等);宣布,公布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 vessels | |
n.血管( vessel的名词复数 );船;容器;(具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的)人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ply | |
v.(搬运工等)等候顾客,弯曲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 confiscated | |
没收,充公( confiscate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 contemplate | |
vt.盘算,计议;周密考虑;注视,凝视 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 cape | |
n.海角,岬;披肩,短披风 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 frigates | |
n.快速军舰( frigate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 regiments | |
(军队的)团( regiment的名词复数 ); 大量的人或物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 regiment | |
n.团,多数,管理;v.组织,编成团,统制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 ashore | |
adv.在(向)岸上,上岸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 contented | |
adj.满意的,安心的,知足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 ordnance | |
n.大炮,军械 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 resolute | |
adj.坚决的,果敢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 convoy | |
vt.护送,护卫,护航;n.护送;护送队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 adroitly | |
adv.熟练地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 adverted | |
引起注意(advert的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 animated | |
adj.生气勃勃的,活跃的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 exertions | |
n.努力( exertion的名词复数 );费力;(能力、权力等的)运用;行使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 exertion | |
n.尽力,努力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 tacked | |
用平头钉钉( tack的过去式和过去分词 ); 附加,增补; 帆船抢风行驶,用粗线脚缝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 tempestuous | |
adj.狂暴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 eloquence | |
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 amazement | |
n.惊奇,惊讶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 hood | |
n.头巾,兜帽,覆盖;v.罩上,以头巾覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 avowed | |
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 monarch | |
n.帝王,君主,最高统治者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 reprobation | |
n.斥责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 adoption | |
n.采用,采纳,通过;收养 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 astonishment | |
n.惊奇,惊异 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 retention | |
n.保留,保持,保持力,记忆力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 repulse | |
n.击退,拒绝;vt.逐退,击退,拒绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 adjourned | |
(使)休会, (使)休庭( adjourn的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 recess | |
n.短期休息,壁凹(墙上装架子,柜子等凹处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 rugged | |
adj.高低不平的,粗糙的,粗壮的,强健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 leeward | |
adj.背风的;下风的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 stimulated | |
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 remonstrances | |
n.抱怨,抗议( remonstrance的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 ebbing | |
(指潮水)退( ebb的现在分词 ); 落; 减少; 衰落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 esteem | |
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 abolition | |
n.废除,取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 majesty | |
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 entreating | |
恳求,乞求( entreat的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 obedience | |
n.服从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 avert | |
v.防止,避免;转移(目光、注意力等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 implored | |
恳求或乞求(某人)( implore的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 densely | |
ad.密集地;浓厚地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 vociferously | |
adv.喊叫地,吵闹地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 adjournment | |
休会; 延期; 休会期; 休庭期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 honourably | |
adv.可尊敬地,光荣地,体面地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 franchise | |
n.特许,特权,专营权,特许权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 chancellor | |
n.(英)大臣;法官;(德、奥)总理;大学校长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 reluctance | |
n.厌恶,讨厌,勉强,不情愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 cliques | |
n.小集团,小圈子,派系( clique的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 privy | |
adj.私用的;隐密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 exchequer | |
n.财政部;国库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 sticklers | |
n.坚持…的人( stickler的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 lucrative | |
adj.赚钱的,可获利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 repugnance | |
n.嫌恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 writs | |
n.书面命令,令状( writ的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 writ | |
n.命令状,书面命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 concession | |
n.让步,妥协;特许(权) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 concessions | |
n.(尤指由政府或雇主给予的)特许权( concession的名词复数 );承认;减价;(在某地的)特许经营权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 testimonies | |
(法庭上证人的)证词( testimony的名词复数 ); 证明,证据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 approbation | |
n.称赞;认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 obnoxious | |
adj.极恼人的,讨人厌的,可憎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 legislate | |
vt.制定法律;n.法规,律例;立法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 supersede | |
v.替代;充任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 bind | |
vt.捆,包扎;装订;约束;使凝固;vi.变硬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 grievance | |
n.怨愤,气恼,委屈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 appellation | |
n.名称,称呼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 solicitude | |
n.焦虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 lauded | |
v.称赞,赞美( laud的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 exhausted | |
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 submission | |
n.服从,投降;温顺,谦虚;提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 repealing | |
撤销,废除( repeal的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 seamen | |
n.海员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 sincerity | |
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 vivaciously | |
adv.快活地;活泼地;愉快地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 mischief | |
n.损害,伤害,危害;恶作剧,捣蛋,胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 vehemently | |
adv. 热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 vehement | |
adj.感情强烈的;热烈的;(人)有强烈感情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 exempting | |
使免除[豁免]( exempt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 pertinacity | |
n.执拗,顽固 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 boroughs | |
(尤指大伦敦的)行政区( borough的名词复数 ); 议会中有代表的市镇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 borough | |
n.享有自治权的市镇;(英)自治市镇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 undue | |
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 promotion | |
n.提升,晋级;促销,宣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 retrenchment | |
n.节省,删除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 exuberant | |
adj.充满活力的;(植物)繁茂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 eulogy | |
n.颂词;颂扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 treasurer | |
n.司库,财务主管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 sinecures | |
n.工作清闲但报酬优厚的职位,挂名的好差事( sinecure的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 sinecure | |
n.闲差事,挂名职务 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 plantations | |
n.种植园,大农场( plantation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 revelling | |
v.作乐( revel的现在分词 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 withheld | |
withhold过去式及过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 obloquy | |
n.斥责,大骂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 ardent | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 disinterestedness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 emoluments | |
n.报酬,薪水( emolument的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 venal | |
adj.唯利是图的,贪脏枉法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 lair | |
n.野兽的巢穴;躲藏处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 variance | |
n.矛盾,不同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 sweeping | |
adj.范围广大的,一扫无遗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 zealously | |
adv.热心地;热情地;积极地;狂热地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 chagrin | |
n.懊恼;气愤;委屈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 mortifying | |
adj.抑制的,苦修的v.使受辱( mortify的现在分词 );伤害(人的感情);克制;抑制(肉体、情感等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 haughty | |
adj.傲慢的,高傲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 mediation | |
n.调解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 adorn | |
vt.使美化,装饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 veered | |
v.(尤指交通工具)改变方向或路线( veer的过去式和过去分词 );(指谈话内容、人的行为或观点)突然改变;(指风) (在北半球按顺时针方向、在南半球按逆时针方向)逐渐转向;风向顺时针转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 respite | |
n.休息,中止,暂缓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 wreck | |
n.失事,遇难;沉船;vt.(船等)失事,遇难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 desperately | |
adv.极度渴望地,绝望地,孤注一掷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 conquerors | |
征服者,占领者( conqueror的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 battering | |
n.用坏,损坏v.连续猛击( batter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 dishonour | |
n./vt.拒付(支票、汇票、票据等);vt.凌辱,使丢脸;n.不名誉,耻辱,不光彩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 drooping | |
adj. 下垂的,无力的 动词droop的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 baron | |
n.男爵;(商业界等)巨头,大王 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 assailed | |
v.攻击( assail的过去式和过去分词 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 waylaying | |
v.拦截,拦路( waylay的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 westward | |
n.西方,西部;adj.西方的,向西的;adv.向西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 aloof | |
adj.远离的;冷淡的,漠不关心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 catastrophe | |
n.大灾难,大祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 mustered | |
v.集合,召集,集结(尤指部队)( muster的过去式和过去分词 );(自他人处)搜集某事物;聚集;激发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 steered | |
v.驾驶( steer的过去式和过去分词 );操纵;控制;引导 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 upwards | |
adv.向上,在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 beleaguered | |
adj.受到围困[围攻]的;包围的v.围攻( beleaguer的过去式和过去分词);困扰;骚扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 garrison | |
n.卫戍部队;驻地,卫戍区;vt.派(兵)驻防 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 incessantly | |
ad.不停地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 appalling | |
adj.骇人听闻的,令人震惊的,可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 actively | |
adv.积极地,勤奋地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 infantry | |
n.[总称]步兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 erect | |
n./v.树立,建立,使竖立;adj.直立的,垂直的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 demolish | |
v.拆毁(建筑物等),推翻(计划、制度等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 congregated | |
(使)集合,聚集( congregate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 fortress | |
n.堡垒,防御工事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 artillery | |
n.(军)火炮,大炮;炮兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 ammunition | |
n.军火,弹药 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 triumphant | |
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 Augmented | |
adj.增音的 动词augment的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 marine | |
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 cannon | |
n.大炮,火炮;飞机上的机关炮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 cork | |
n.软木,软木塞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 combustion | |
n.燃烧;氧化;骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 plentiful | |
adj.富裕的,丰富的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 cisterns | |
n.蓄水池,储水箱( cistern的名词复数 );地下储水池 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 rumour | |
n.谣言,谣传,传闻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 mortars | |
n.迫击炮( mortar的名词复数 );砂浆;房产;研钵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 simultaneously | |
adv.同时发生地,同时进行地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 deluges | |
v.使淹没( deluge的第三人称单数 );淹没;被洪水般涌来的事物所淹没;穷于应付 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 nascent | |
adj.初生的,发生中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 pelting | |
微不足道的,无价值的,盛怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 indefatigable | |
adj.不知疲倦的,不屈不挠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 prodigal | |
adj.浪费的,挥霍的,放荡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 snug | |
adj.温暖舒适的,合身的,安全的;v.使整洁干净,舒适地依靠,紧贴;n.(英)酒吧里的私房 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 scouts | |
侦察员[机,舰]( scout的名词复数 ); 童子军; 搜索; 童子军成员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 cargoes | |
n.(船或飞机装载的)货物( cargo的名词复数 );大量,重负 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 gales | |
龙猫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 demonstrations | |
证明( demonstration的名词复数 ); 表明; 表达; 游行示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 overtures | |
n.主动的表示,提议;(向某人做出的)友好表示、姿态或提议( overture的名词复数 );(歌剧、芭蕾舞、音乐剧等的)序曲,前奏曲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 entailed | |
使…成为必要( entail的过去式和过去分词 ); 需要; 限定继承; 使必需 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 confession | |
n.自白,供认,承认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 hampered | |
妨碍,束缚,限制( hamper的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 envoy | |
n.使节,使者,代表,公使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 embitter | |
v.使苦;激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 groaning | |
adj. 呜咽的, 呻吟的 动词groan的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 stipulating | |
v.(尤指在协议或建议中)规定,约定,讲明(条件等)( stipulate的现在分词 );规定,明确要求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 truce | |
n.休战,(争执,烦恼等的)缓和;v.以停战结束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 commissioners | |
n.专员( commissioner的名词复数 );长官;委员;政府部门的长官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 incensed | |
盛怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 subservient | |
adj.卑屈的,阿谀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 restitution | |
n.赔偿;恢复原状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 Partisanship | |
n. 党派性, 党派偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 determinedly | |
adv.决意地;坚决地,坚定地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 debtor | |
n.借方,债务人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 creditor | |
n.债仅人,债主,贷方 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 envoys | |
使节( envoy的名词复数 ); 公使; 谈判代表; 使节身份 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 deception | |
n.欺骗,欺诈;骗局,诡计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 preamble | |
n.前言;序文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 dominions | |
统治权( dominion的名词复数 ); 领土; 疆土; 版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 repayment | |
n.偿还,偿还款;报酬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 prosecutions | |
起诉( prosecution的名词复数 ); 原告; 实施; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 kinsmen | |
n.家属,亲属( kinsman的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 recollected | |
adj.冷静的;镇定的;被回忆起的;沉思默想的v.记起,想起( recollect的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 vindictively | |
adv.恶毒地;报复地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 traitors | |
卖国贼( traitor的名词复数 ); 叛徒; 背叛者; 背信弃义的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 chastisement | |
n.惩罚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 purloining | |
v.偷窃( purloin的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 velvet | |
n.丝绒,天鹅绒;adj.丝绒制的,柔软的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 prorogued | |
v.使(议会)休会( prorogue的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 torrent | |
n.激流,洪流;爆发,(话语等的)连发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 censures | |
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 upbraided | |
v.责备,申斥,谴责( upbraid的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 intrigues | |
n.密谋策划( intrigue的名词复数 );神秘气氛;引人入胜的复杂情节v.搞阴谋诡计( intrigue的第三人称单数 );激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 diplomacy | |
n.外交;外交手腕,交际手腕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 stimulant | |
n.刺激物,兴奋剂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 pacification | |
n. 讲和,绥靖,平定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 mooted | |
adj.未决定的,有争议的,有疑问的v.提出…供讨论( moot的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 fortify | |
v.强化防御,为…设防;加强,强化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 regained | |
复得( regain的过去式和过去分词 ); 赢回; 重回; 复至某地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 demolition | |
n.破坏,毁坏,毁坏之遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 abrogated | |
废除(法律等)( abrogate的过去式和过去分词 ); 取消; 去掉; 抛开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 erecting | |
v.使直立,竖起( erect的现在分词 );建立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 Mediterranean | |
adj.地中海的;地中海沿岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 insular | |
adj.岛屿的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 infamous | |
adj.声名狼藉的,臭名昭著的,邪恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 manly | |
adj.有男子气概的;adv.男子般地,果断地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 subterfuges | |
n.(用说谎或欺骗以逃脱责备、困难等的)花招,遁词( subterfuge的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 stratagems | |
n.诡计,计谋( stratagem的名词复数 );花招 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 destitution | |
n.穷困,缺乏,贫穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 demolished | |
v.摧毁( demolish的过去式和过去分词 );推翻;拆毁(尤指大建筑物);吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 consolidated | |
a.联合的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 dictated | |
v.大声讲或读( dictate的过去式和过去分词 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 exclusion | |
n.拒绝,排除,排斥,远足,远途旅行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 harass | |
vt.使烦恼,折磨,骚扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 thwart | |
v.阻挠,妨碍,反对;adj.横(断的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 sketched | |
v.草拟(sketch的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 amendments | |
(法律、文件的)改动( amendment的名词复数 ); 修正案; 修改; (美国宪法的)修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 inviolate | |
adj.未亵渎的,未受侵犯的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 groans | |
n.呻吟,叹息( groan的名词复数 );呻吟般的声音v.呻吟( groan的第三人称单数 );发牢骚;抱怨;受苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 medley | |
n.混合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 loathing | |
n.厌恶,憎恨v.憎恨,厌恶( loathe的现在分词);极不喜欢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 anomalous | |
adj.反常的;不规则的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 bribery | |
n.贿络行为,行贿,受贿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 metropolis | |
n.首府;大城市 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 gambling | |
n.赌博;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 orator | |
n.演说者,演讲者,雄辩家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 outfit | |
n.(为特殊用途的)全套装备,全套服装 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 nominal | |
adj.名义上的;(金额、租金)微不足道的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 enacted | |
制定(法律),通过(法案)( enact的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 mansion | |
n.大厦,大楼;宅第 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 narration | |
n.讲述,叙述;故事;记叙体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 transpiring | |
(事实,秘密等)被人知道( transpire的现在分词 ); 泄露; 显露; 发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 holders | |
支持物( holder的名词复数 ); 持有者; (支票等)持有人; 支托(或握持)…之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 territorial | |
adj.领土的,领地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 sordid | |
adj.肮脏的,不干净的,卑鄙的,暗淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 rejection | |
n.拒绝,被拒,抛弃,被弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 smoothly | |
adv.平滑地,顺利地,流利地,流畅地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 annihilate | |
v.使无效;毁灭;取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 prerogatives | |
n.权利( prerogative的名词复数 );特权;大主教法庭;总督委任组成的法庭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 prerogative | |
n.特权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 devoid | |
adj.全无的,缺乏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 exasperated | |
adj.恼怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 ominous | |
adj.不祥的,不吉的,预兆的,预示的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 vivacity | |
n.快活,活泼,精神充沛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 scruple | |
n./v.顾忌,迟疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 goaded | |
v.刺激( goad的过去式和过去分词 );激励;(用尖棒)驱赶;驱使(或怂恿、刺激)某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 impunity | |
n.(惩罚、损失、伤害等的)免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 persevere | |
v.坚持,坚忍,不屈不挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337 ascertained | |
v.弄清,确定,查明( ascertain的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338 censured | |
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339 entrusted | |
v.委托,托付( entrust的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340 advisers | |
顾问,劝告者( adviser的名词复数 ); (指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341 prorogation | |
n.休会,闭会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342 artifice | |
n.妙计,高明的手段;狡诈,诡计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343 petulance | |
n.发脾气,生气,易怒,暴躁,性急 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345 inflame | |
v.使燃烧;使极度激动;使发炎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346 jealousies | |
n.妒忌( jealousy的名词复数 );妒羡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348 proprietors | |
n.所有人,业主( proprietor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349 miserably | |
adv.痛苦地;悲惨地;糟糕地;极度地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350 irresolute | |
adj.无决断的,优柔寡断的,踌躇不定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351 disdained | |
鄙视( disdain的过去式和过去分词 ); 不屑于做,不愿意做 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352 adverse | |
adj.不利的;有害的;敌对的,不友好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353 encroachment | |
n.侵入,蚕食 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354 exulting | |
vi. 欢欣鼓舞,狂喜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356 mace | |
n.狼牙棒,豆蔻干皮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357 abeyance | |
n.搁置,缓办,中止,产权未定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358 climax | |
n.顶点;高潮;v.(使)达到顶点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359 appropriation | |
n.拨款,批准支出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360 condescend | |
v.俯就,屈尊;堕落,丢丑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361 syllable | |
n.音节;vt.分音节 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
362 advantageous | |
adj.有利的;有帮助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
363 convoke | |
v.召集会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
364 extolled | |
v.赞颂,赞扬,赞美( extol的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
365 defender | |
n.保卫者,拥护者,辩护人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
366 ridicule | |
v.讥讽,挖苦;n.嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |