The ‘Bodensee’ German passenger balloon.
In considering the possibility of a commercial dirigible service, it is necessary always to bear in mind373 the disadvantages of first cost and upkeep as compared with the aeroplane. The building of a modern rigid10 is an exceedingly costly11 undertaking, and the provision of an efficient supply of hydrogen gas to keep its compartments12 filled is a very large item in upkeep of which the heavier-than-air machine goes free. Yet the future of commercial aeronautics13 so far would seem to lie with the dirigible where very long voyages are in question. No matter how the aeroplane may be improved, the possibility of engine failure always remains14 as a danger for work over water. In seaplane or flying boat form, the danger is still present in a rough sea, though in the American Transatlantic flight, N.C.3, taxi-ing 300 miles to the Azores after having fallen to the water, proved that this danger is not so acute as is generally assumed. Yet the multiple-engined rigid, as R.34 showed on her return voyage, may have part of her power plant put out of action altogether and still complete her voyage very successfully, which, in the case of mail carrying and services run strictly15 to time, gives her an enormous advantage over the heavier-than-air machine.
‘For commercial purposes,’ General Sykes has remarked, ‘the airship is eminently16 adapted for long distance journeys involving non-stop flights. It has this inherent advantage over the aeroplane, that while there appears to be a limit to the range of the aeroplane as at present constructed, there is practically no limit whatever to that of the airship, as this can be overcome by merely increasing the size. It thus appears that for such journeys as crossing the Atlantic, or crossing the Pacific from the west coast of America to Australia or Japan, the airship will be peculiarly suitable. It having374 been conceded that the scope of the airship is long distance travel, the only type which need be considered for this purpose is the rigid. The rigid airship is still in an embryonic17 state, but sufficient has already been accomplished in this country, and more particularly in Germany, to show that with increased capacity there is no reason why, within a few years’ time, airships should not be built capable of completing the circuit of the globe and of conveying sufficient passengers and merchandise to render such an undertaking a paying proposition.’
The British R.38 class, embodying18 the latest improvements in airship design outside Germany, gives a gross lift per airship of 85 tons and a net lift of about 45 tons. The capacity of the gas bags is about two and three-quarter million cubic feet, and, travelling at the rate of 45 miles per hour, the cruising range of the vessel is estimated at 8·8 days. Six engines, each of 350 horse-power, admit of an extreme speed of 70 miles per hour if necessary.
The last word in German design is exemplified in the rigids L.70 and L.71, together with the commercial airship ‘Bodensee.’ Previous to the construction of these, the L.65 type is noteworthy as being the first Zeppelin in which direct drive of the propeller19 was introduced, together with an improved and lighter20 type of car. L.70, built in 1918 and destroyed by the British naval21 forces, had a speed of about 75 miles per hour; L.71 had a maximum speed of 72 miles per hour, a gas bag capacity of 2,420,000 cubic feet, and a length of 743 feet, while the total lift was 73 tons. Progress in design is best shown by the progress in useful load; in the L.70 and L.71 class, this has been increased to375 58·3 per cent, while in the Bodensee it was even higher.
As was shown in R.34’s American flight, the main problem in connection with the commercial use of dirigibles is that of mooring22 in the open. The nearest to a solution of this problem, so far, consists in the mast carrying a swivelling cap; this has been tried in the British service with a non-rigid airship, which was attached to a mast in open country in a gale23 of 52 miles an hour without the slightest damage to the airship. In its commercial form, the mast would probably take the form of a tower, at the top of which the cap would revolve24 so that the airship should always face the wind, the tower being used for embarkation25 and disembarkation of passengers and the provision of fuel and gas. Such a system would render sheds unnecessary except in case of repairs, and would enormously decrease the establishment charges of any commercial airship.
All this, however, is hypothetical. Remains the airship of to-day, developed far beyond the promise of five years ago, capable, as has been proved by its achievements both in Britain and in Germany, of undertaking practically any given voyage with success.
点击收听单词发音
1 undertaking | |
n.保证,许诺,事业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 incurring | |
遭受,招致,引起( incur的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 fatality | |
n.不幸,灾祸,天命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 vessels | |
n.血管( vessel的名词复数 );船;容器;(具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的)人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 rigid | |
adj.严格的,死板的;刚硬的,僵硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 compartments | |
n.间隔( compartment的名词复数 );(列车车厢的)隔间;(家具或设备等的)分隔间;隔层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 aeronautics | |
n.航空术,航空学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 embryonic | |
adj.胚胎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 embodying | |
v.表现( embody的现在分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 propeller | |
n.螺旋桨,推进器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 lighter | |
n.打火机,点火器;驳船;v.用驳船运送;light的比较级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 mooring | |
n.停泊处;系泊用具,系船具;下锚v.停泊,系泊(船只)(moor的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 gale | |
n.大风,强风,一阵闹声(尤指笑声等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 revolve | |
vi.(使)旋转;循环出现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 embarkation | |
n. 乘船, 搭机, 开船 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |