But the laws should fix a certain space of time both for the defence of the accused and for the discovery[158] of proofs against him. It would place the judge in the position of a legislator were it his duty to fix the time necessary for the latter. In the same way those atrocious crimes, whose memory tarries long in men’s minds, deserve, when once proved, no prescription6 in favour of a criminal who has fled from his country; but lesser7 and obscure crimes should be allowed a certain prescription, which may remove a man’s uncertainty8 concerning his fate, because the obscurity in which for a long time his crimes have been involved deducts9 from the bad example of his impunity10, and the possibility of reform meantime remains11 to him. It is enough to indicate these principles, because I cannot fix a precise limit of time, except for a given system of laws and in given social circumstances. I will only add that, the advantage of moderate penalties in a nation being proved, the laws which shorten or lengthen12, according to the gravity of crimes, the term of prescription or of proofs, thus making of prison itself or of voluntary exile a part of the punishment, will supply an easy classification of a few mild punishments for a very large number of crimes.
But these periods of time will not be lengthened13 in exact proportion to the atrocity14 of crimes, since the probability of a crime is in inverse15 ratio to its atrocity. It will, then, be necessary to shorten the period for inquiry16 and to increase that of prescription; which[159] may appear to contradict what I said before, namely, that it is possible to inflict17 equal penalties on unequal crimes, by counting as a penalty that period of imprisonment18 or of prescription which precedes the verdict. To explain to the reader my idea: I distinguish two kinds of crimes—the first, atrocious crimes, beginning with homicide and including all the excessive forms of wickedness; the second comprising less considerable crimes. This distinction is founded in human nature. Personal security is a natural right, the security of property a social one. The number of motives19 which impel20 men to violate their natural affections is far smaller than those which impel them, by their natural longing21 for happiness, to violate a right which they do not find written in their hearts but only in the conventions of society. The very great difference between the probability of these two kinds of crime respectively makes it necessary that they should be ruled by different principles. In cases of the more atrocious crimes, because they are more uncommon22, the time for inquiry ought to be so much the less as the probability of the innocence of the accused is greater; and the time of prescription ought to be longer, as on an ultimate definite sentence of guilt23 or innocence depends the destruction of the hope of impunity, the harm of which is proportioned to the atrocity of the crime. But in cases of lesser criminality, where the presumption24 in favour of a man’s[160] innocence is less, the time for inquiry should be longer; and as the harm of impunity is less, the time of prescription should be shorter. But such a division of crimes ought, indeed, not to be admitted, if the danger of impunity decreased exactly in proportion to the greater probability of the crime. One should remember that an accused man, whose guilt or innocence is uncertain, may, though acquitted25 for lack of proofs, be subjected for the same crime to a fresh imprisonment and inquiry, in the event of fresh legal proofs rising up against him, so long as the time of prescription accorded by the laws has not been past. Such at least is the compromise that I think best fitted to preserve both the liberty and the security of the subject, it being only too easy so to favour the one at the expense of the other, that these two blessings26, the inalienable and equal patrimony27 of every citizen, are left unprotected and undefended, the one from declared or veiled despotism, the other from the turbulence28 of civil anarchy29.
There are some crimes which are at the same time of common occurrence and of difficult proof. In them the difficulty of proof is equivalent to a probability of innocence; and the harm of their impunity being so much the less to be considered as their frequency depends on principles other than the risk of punishment, the time for inquiry and the period of prescription ought both to be proportionately less. Yet[161] cases of adultery and pederasty, both of difficult proof, are precisely30 those in which, according to received principles, tyrannical presumptions31 of quasi-proofs and half-proofs are allowed to prevail (as if a man could be half-innocent or half-guilty, in other words, half-punishable or half-acquittable); in which torture exercises its cruel sway over the person of the accused, over the witnesses, and even over the whole family of an unfortunate wretch32, according to the coldly wicked teaching of some doctors of law, who set themselves up as the rule and standard for judges to follow.
In view of these principles it will appear strange (to anyone who does not reflect, that reason has, so to speak, never yet legislated33 for a nation), that it is just the most atrocious crimes or the most secret and chimerical34 ones—that is, those of the least probability—which are proved by conjectures35 or by the weakest and most equivocal proofs: as if it were the interest of the laws and of the judge, not to search for the truth, but to find out the crime; as if the danger of condemning36 an innocent man were not so much the greater, the greater the probability of his innocence over that of his guilt.
The majority of mankind lack that vigour37 which is equally necessary for the greatest crimes as for the greatest virtues38; whence it would appear, that both extremes are contemporaneous phenomena39 in nations[162] which depend rather on the energy of their government and of the passions that tend to the public good, than on their size and the constant goodness of their laws. In the latter the weakened passions seem more adapted to maintain than to improve the form of government. From which flows an important consequence, namely, that great crimes in a nation do not always prove its decline.
点击收听单词发音
1 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 certified | |
a.经证明合格的;具有证明文件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 defective | |
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deducts | |
v.扣除,减去( deduct的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 impunity | |
n.(惩罚、损失、伤害等的)免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lengthen | |
vt.使伸长,延长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 lengthened | |
(时间或空间)延长,伸长( lengthen的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 atrocity | |
n.残暴,暴行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 inverse | |
adj.相反的,倒转的,反转的;n.相反之物;v.倒转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inflict | |
vt.(on)把…强加给,使遭受,使承担 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 imprisonment | |
n.关押,监禁,坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 impel | |
v.推动;激励,迫使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 longing | |
n.(for)渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 uncommon | |
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 presumption | |
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 acquitted | |
宣判…无罪( acquit的过去式和过去分词 ); 使(自己)作出某种表现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 blessings | |
n.(上帝的)祝福( blessing的名词复数 );好事;福分;因祸得福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 patrimony | |
n.世袭财产,继承物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 turbulence | |
n.喧嚣,狂暴,骚乱,湍流 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 presumptions | |
n.假定( presumption的名词复数 );认定;推定;放肆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 wretch | |
n.可怜的人,不幸的人;卑鄙的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 legislated | |
v.立法,制定法律( legislate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 chimerical | |
adj.荒诞不经的,梦幻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 conjectures | |
推测,猜想( conjecture的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |