Banishment2, it would seem, should be employed[181] in the case of those against whom, when accused of an atrocious crime, there is a great probability but not a certainty of guilt3; but for this purpose a statute4 is required, as little arbitrary and as precise as possible, condemning5 to banishment any man who shall have placed his country in the fatal dilemma6 of either fearing him or of injuring him, leaving him, however, the sacred right of proving his innocence7. Stronger reasons then should exist to justify8 the banishment of a native than of a foreigner, of a man criminated for the first time than of one who has been often so situated9.
But should a man who is banished and excluded for ever from the society of which he was a member be also deprived of his property? Such a question may be regarded from different points of view. The loss of property is a greater punishment than banishment; there ought, therefore, to be some cases in which, according to his crime, a man should lose the whole, or part, or none of his property. The confiscation10 of the whole will occur, when the legal sentence of banishment is of a kind to annihilate11 all the ties that exist between society and its offending member; for in such a case the citizen dies, and only the man remains12; and with regard to the political body civil death should produce the same effect as natural death. It would seem then that the confiscated14 property should pass to a man’s lawful15 heirs rather than[182] to the head of the State, since death and banishment in its extreme form are the same with regard to the body politic13. But it is not by this subtlety16 that I dare to disapprove17 of confiscations of property. If some have maintained that confiscations have acted as checks on acts of revenge and on the great power of individuals, it is from neglecting to consider that, however much good punishments may effect, they are not for that reason always just, because to be just they must be necessary; and an expedient18 injustice19 can be tolerated by no legislator, who wishes to close all doors against watchful20 tyranny, ever ready to hold out flattering hopes, by temporary advantages and by the prosperity of a few persons of celebrity21, in disregard of future ruin and of the tears of numberless persons of obscurity. Confiscations place a price on the heads of the feeble, cause the innocent to suffer the punishment of the guilty, and make the commission of crimes a desperate necessity even for the innocent. What sadder sight can there be than that of a family dragged down to infamy22 and misery23 by the crimes of its head, unable to prevent them by the submission24 imposed on it by the laws, even supposing such prevention to have been within its power!
点击收听单词发音
1 banished | |
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 banishment | |
n.放逐,驱逐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 statute | |
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 dilemma | |
n.困境,进退两难的局面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 confiscation | |
n. 没收, 充公, 征收 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 annihilate | |
v.使无效;毁灭;取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 politic | |
adj.有智虑的;精明的;v.从政 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 confiscated | |
没收,充公( confiscate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 subtlety | |
n.微妙,敏锐,精巧;微妙之处,细微的区别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 disapprove | |
v.不赞成,不同意,不批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 expedient | |
adj.有用的,有利的;n.紧急的办法,权宜之计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 watchful | |
adj.注意的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 infamy | |
n.声名狼藉,出丑,恶行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 submission | |
n.服从,投降;温顺,谦虚;提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |