The allusion1 to the waifs and waif-poles in the last chapter but one, necessitates2 some account of the laws and regulations of the whale fishery, of which the waif may be deemed the grand symbol and badge.
It frequently happens that when several ships are cruising in company, a whale may be struck by one vessel3, then escape, and be finally killed and captured by another vessel; and herein are indirectly4 comprised many minor5 contingencies6, all partaking of this one grand feature. For example,--after a weary and perilous9 chase and capture of a whale, the body may get loose from the ship by reason of a violent storm; and drifting far away to leeward10, be retaken by a second whaler, who, in a calm, snugly11 tows it alongside, without risk of life or line. Thus the most vexatious and violent disputes would often arise between the fishermen, were there not some written or unwritten, universal, undisputed law applicable to all cases.
Perhaps the only formal whaling code authorized12 by legislative13 enactment14, was that of Holland. It was decreed by the States-General in A.D. 1695. But though no other nation has ever had any written whaling law, yet the American fishermen have been their own legislators and lawyers in this matter. They have provided a system which for terse15 comprehensiveness surpasses Justinian's Pandects and the By-laws of the Chinese Society for the Suppression of Meddling16 with other People's Business. Yes; these laws might be engraven on a Queen Anne's farthing, or the barb17 of a harpoon18, and worn round the neck, so small are they.
I. A Fast-Fish belongs to the party fast to it.
II. A Loose-Fish is fair game for anybody who can soonest catch it.
But what plays the mischief19 with this masterly code is the admirable brevity of it, which necessitates a vast volume of commentaries to expound20 it.
First: What is a Fast-Fish? Alive or dead a fish is technically21 fast, when it is connected with an occupied ship or boat, by any medium at all controllable by the occupant or occupants,--a mast, an oar22, a nine-inch cable, a telegraph wire, or a strand23 of cobweb, it is all the same. Likewise a fish is technically fast when it bears a waif, or any other recognized symbol of possession; so long as the party wailing24 it plainly evince their ability at any time to take it alongside, as well as their intention so to do.
These are scientific commentaries; but the commentaries of the whalemen themselves sometimes consist in hard words and harder knocks-- the Coke-upon-Littleton of the fist. True, among the more upright and honorable whalemen allowances are always made for peculiar25 cases, where it would be an outrageous26 moral injustice27 for one party to claim possession of a whale previously28 chased or killed by another party. But others are by no means so scrupulous29.
Some fifty years ago there was a curious case of whale-trover litigated in England, wherein the plaintiffs set forth30 that after a hard chase of a whale in the Northern seas; and when indeed they (the plaintiffs) had succeeded in harpooning31 the fish; they were at last, through peril8 of their lives, obliged to forsake32 not only their lines, but their boat itself. Ultimately the defendants33 (the crew of another ship) came up with the whale, struck, killed, seized, and finally appropriated it before the very eyes of the plaintiffs. And when those defendants were remonstrated34 with, their captain snapped his fingers in the plaintiffs' teeth, and assured them that by way of doxology to the deed he had done, he would now retain their line, harpoons35, and boat, which had remained attached to the whale at the time of the seizure36. Wherefore the plaintiffs now sued for the recovery of the value of their whale, line, harpoons, and boat.
Mr. Erskine was counsel for the defendants; Lord Ellenborough was the judge. In the course of the defence, the witty37 Erskine went on to illustrate38 his position, by alluding39 to a recent crim. con7. case, wherein a gentleman, after in vain trying to bridle40 his wife's viciousness, had at last abandoned her upon the seas of life; but in the course of years, repenting41 of that step, he instituted an action to recover possession of her. Erskine was on the other side; and he then supported it by saying, that though the gentleman had originally harpooned42 the lady, and had once had her fast, and only by reason of the great stress of her plunging43 viciousness, had at last abandoned her; yet abandon her he did, so that she became a loose-fish; and therefore when a subsequent gentleman re-harpooned her, the lady then became that subsequent gentleman's property, along with whatever harpoon might have been found sticking in her.
Now in the present case Erskine contended that the examples of the whale and the lady were reciprocally illustrative of each other.
These pleadings, and the counter pleadings, being duly heard, the very learned Judge in set terms decided44, to wit,-- That as for the boat, he awarded it to the plaintiffs, because they had merely abandoned it to save their lives; but that with regard to the controverted45 whale, harpoons, and line, they belonged to the defendants; the whale, because it was a Loose-Fish at the time of the final capture; and the harpoons and line because when the fish made off with them, it (the fish) acquired a property in those articles; and hence anybody who afterwards took the fish had a right to them. Now the defendants afterwards took the fish; ergo, the aforesaid articles were theirs.
A common man looking at this decision of the very learned Judge, might possibly object to it. But ploughed up to the primary rock of the matter, the two great principles laid down in the twin whaling laws previously quoted, and applied46 and elucidated47 by Lord Ellenborough in the above cited case; these two laws touching48 Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish, I say, will on reflection, be found the fundamentals of all human jurisprudence; For notwithstanding its complicated tracery of sculpture, the Temple of the Law, like the Temple of the Philistines49, has but two props50 to stand on.
Is it not a saying in every one's mouth, Possession is half of the law: that is, regardless of how the thing came into possession? But often possession is the whole of the law. What are the sinews and souls of Russian serfs and Republican slaves but Fast-Fish, whereof possession is the whole of the law? What to the rapacious51 landlord is the widow's last mite52 but a Fast-Fish? What is yonder undetected villain's marble mansion53 with a doorplate for a waif; what is that but a Fast-Fish? What is the ruinous discount which Mordecai, the broker54, gets from the poor Woebegone, the bankrupt, on a loan to keep Woebegone's family from starvation; what is that ruinous discount but a Fast-Fish? What is the Archbishop of Savesoul's income of 100,000 pounds seized from the scant55 bread and cheese of hundreds of thousands of broken-backed laborers56 (all sure of heaven without any of Savesoul's help) what is that globular 100,000 but a Fast-Fish. What are the Duke of Dunder's hereditary57 towns and hamlets but Fast-Fish? What to that redoubted harpooneer, John Bull, is poor Ireland, but a Fast-Fish? What to that apostolic lancer, Brother Jonathan, is Texas but a Fast-Fish? And concerning all these, is not Possession the whole of the law?
But if the doctrine58 of Fast-Fish be pretty generally applicable, the kindred doctrine of Loose-Fish is still more widely so. That is internationally and universally applicable.
What was America in 1492 but a Loose-Fish, in which Columbus struck the Spanish standard by way of wailing it for his royal master and mistress? What was Poland to the Czar? What Greece to the Turk? What India to England? What at last will Mexico be to the United States? All Loose-Fish.
What are the Rights of Man and the Liberties of the World but Loose-Fish? What all men's minds and opinions but Loose-Fish? What is the principle of religious belief in them but a Loose-Fish? What to the ostentatious smuggling59 verbalists are the thoughts of thinkers but Loose-Fish? What is the great globe itself but a Loose-Fish? And what are you, reader, but a Loose-Fish and a Fast-Fish, too?
1 allusion | |
n.暗示,间接提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 necessitates | |
使…成为必要,需要( necessitate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 contingencies | |
n.偶然发生的事故,意外事故( contingency的名词复数 );以备万一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 con | |
n.反对的观点,反对者,反对票,肺病;vt.精读,学习,默记;adv.反对地,从反面;adj.欺诈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 peril | |
n.(严重的)危险;危险的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 leeward | |
adj.背风的;下风的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 snugly | |
adv.紧贴地;贴身地;暖和舒适地;安适地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 enactment | |
n.演出,担任…角色;制订,通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 terse | |
adj.(说话,文笔)精炼的,简明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 meddling | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 barb | |
n.(鱼钩等的)倒钩,倒刺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 harpoon | |
n.鱼叉;vt.用鱼叉叉,用鱼叉捕获 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 mischief | |
n.损害,伤害,危害;恶作剧,捣蛋,胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 expound | |
v.详述;解释;阐述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 oar | |
n.桨,橹,划手;v.划行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 strand | |
vt.使(船)搁浅,使(某人)困于(某地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 wailing | |
v.哭叫,哀号( wail的现在分词 );沱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 outrageous | |
adj.无理的,令人不能容忍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 scrupulous | |
adj.审慎的,小心翼翼的,完全的,纯粹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 harpooning | |
v.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 forsake | |
vt.遗弃,抛弃;舍弃,放弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 defendants | |
被告( defendant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 remonstrated | |
v.抗议( remonstrate的过去式和过去分词 );告诫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 harpoons | |
n.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的名词复数 )v.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 seizure | |
n.没收;占有;抵押 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 witty | |
adj.机智的,风趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 alluding | |
提及,暗指( allude的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 bridle | |
n.笼头,束缚;vt.抑制,约束;动怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 repenting | |
对(自己的所为)感到懊悔或忏悔( repent的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 harpooned | |
v.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 plunging | |
adj.跳进的,突进的v.颠簸( plunge的现在分词 );暴跌;骤降;突降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 controverted | |
v.争论,反驳,否定( controvert的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 elucidated | |
v.阐明,解释( elucidate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 philistines | |
n.市侩,庸人( philistine的名词复数 );庸夫俗子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 props | |
小道具; 支柱( prop的名词复数 ); 支持者; 道具; (橄榄球中的)支柱前锋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 rapacious | |
adj.贪婪的,强夺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 mite | |
n.极小的东西;小铜币 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 mansion | |
n.大厦,大楼;宅第 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 broker | |
n.中间人,经纪人;v.作为中间人来安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 scant | |
adj.不充分的,不足的;v.减缩,限制,忽略 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 laborers | |
n.体力劳动者,工人( laborer的名词复数 );(熟练工人的)辅助工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 smuggling | |
n.走私 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |