From what is said in the Introduction to the Monastery1, it must necessarily be inferred, that the Author considered that romance as something very like a failure. It is true, the booksellers did not complain of the sale, because, unless on very felicitous2 occasions, or on those which are equally the reverse, literary popularity is not gained or lost by a single publication. Leisure must be allowed for the tide both to flow and ebb3. But I was conscious that, in my situation, not to advance was in some Degree to recede4, and being naturally unwilling5 to think that the principle of decay lay in myself, I was at least desirous to know of a certainty, whether the degree of discountenance which I had incurred6, was now owing to an ill-managed story, or an ill-chosen subject.
I was never, I confess, one of those who are willing to suppose the brains of an author to be a kind of milk, which will not stand above a single creaming, and who are eternally harping7 to young authors to husband their efforts, and to be chary8 of their reputation, lest it grow hackneyed in the eyes of men. Perhaps I was, and have always been, the more indifferent to the degree of estimation in which I might be held as an author, because I did not put so high a value as many others upon what is termed literary reputation in the abstract, or at least upon the species of popularity which had fallen to my share; for though it were worse than affectation to deny that my vanity was satisfied at my success in the department in which chance had in some measure enlisted10 me, I was, nevertheless, far from thinking that the novelist or romance-writer stands high in the ranks of literature. But I spare the reader farther egotism on this subject, as I have expressed my opinion very fully11 in the Introductory Epistle to the Fortunes of Nigel, first edition; and, although it be composed in an imaginary character, it is as sincere and candid12 as if it had been written “without my gown and band.”
In a word, when I considered myself as having been unsuccessful in the Monastery, I was tempted13 to try whether I could not restore, even at the risk of totally losing, my so-called reputation, by a new hazard — I looked round my library, and could not but observe, that, from the time of Chaucer to that of Byron, the most popular authors had been the most prolific14. Even the aristarch Johnson allowed that the quality of readiness and profusion15 had a merit in itself, independent of the intrinsic value of the composition. Talking of Churchill, I believe, who had little merit in his prejudiced eyes, he allowed him that of fertility, with some such qualification as this, “A Crab-apple can bear but crabs16 after all; but there is a great difference in favour of that which bears a large quantity of fruit, however indifferent, and that which produces only a few.”
Looking more attentively17 at the patriarchs of literature, whose earner was as long as it was brilliant, I thought I perceived that in the busy and prolonged course of exertion18, there were no doubt occasional failures, but that still those who were favourites of their age triumphed over these miscarriages19. By the new efforts which they made, their errors were obliterated20, they became identified with the literature of their country, and after having long received law from the critics, came in some degree to impose it. And when such a writer was at length called from the scene, his death first made the public sensible what a large share he had occupied in their attention. I recollected21 a passage in Grimm’s Correspondence, that while the unexhausted Voltaire sent forth22 tract9 after tract to the very close of a long life, the first impression made by each as it appeared, was, that it was inferior to its predecessors23; an opinion adopted from the general idea that the Patriarch of Ferney must at last find the point from which he was to decline. But the opinion of the public finally ranked in succession the last of Voltaire’s Essays on the same footing with those which had formerly25 charmed the French nation. The inference from this and similar facts seemed to me to be, that new works were often judged of by the public, not so much from their own intrinsic merit, as from extrinsic26 ideas which readers had previously27 formed with regard to them, and over which a writer might hope to triumph by patience and by exertion. There is risk in the attempt;
“If he fall in, good night, or sink or swim.”
But this is a chance incident to every literary attempt, and by which men of a sanguine28 temper are little moved.
I may illustrate29 what I mean, by the feelings of most men in travelling. If we have found any stage particularly tedious, or in an especial degree interesting, particularly short, or much longer than we expected, our imaginations are so apt to exaggerate the original impression, that, on repeating the journey, we usually find that we have considerably30 over-rated the predominating quality, and the road appears to be duller or more pleasant, shorter or more tedious, than what we expected, and, consequently, than what is actually the case. It requires a third or fourth journey to enable us to form an accurate judgment31 of its beauty, its length, or its other attributes.
In the same manner, the public, judging of a new work, which it receives perhaps with little expectation, if surprised into applause, becomes very often ecstatic, gives a great deal more approbation32 than is due, and elevates the child of its immediate33 favour to a rank which, as it affects the author, it is equally difficult to keep, and painful to lose. If, on this occasion, the author trembles at the height to which he is raised, and becomes afraid of the shadow of his own renown34, he may indeed retire from the lottery35 with the prize which he has drawn36, but, in future ages, his honour will be only in proportion to his labours. If, on the contrary, he rushes again into the lists, he is sure to be judged with severity proportioned to the former favour of the public. If he be daunted37 by a bad reception on this second occasion, he may again become a stranger to the arena38. If, on the contrary, he can keep his ground, and stand the shuttlecock’s fate, of being struck up and down, he will probably, at length, hold with some certainty the level in public opinion which he may be found to deserve; and he may perhaps boast of arresting the general attention, in the same manner as the Bachelor Samson Carrasco, of fixing the weathercock La Giralda of Seville for weeks, months, or years, that is, for as long as the wind shall uniformly blow from one quarter. To this degree of popularity the author had the hardihood to aspire39, while, in order to attain40 it, he assumed the daring resolution to keep himself in the view of the public by frequent appearances before them.
It must be added, that the author’s incognito41 gave him greater courage to renew his attempts to please the public, and an advantage similar to that which Jack42 the Giant-killer received from his coat of darkness. In sending the Abbot forth so soon after the Monastery, he had used the well-known practice recommended by Bassanio:—
“In my school days, when I had lost one shaft43,
I shot another of the self-same flight,
The self-same way, with more advised watch,
To find the other forth.”
And, to continue the simile44, his shafts45, like those of the lesser46 Ajax, were discharged more readily that the archer47 was as inaccessible48 to criticism, personally speaking, as the Grecian archer under his brother’s sevenfold shield.
Should the reader desire to know upon what principles the Abbot was expected to amend49 the fortune of the Monastery, I have first to request his attention to the Introductory Epistle addressed to the imaginary Captain Clutterbuck; a mode by which, like his predecessors in this walk of fiction, the real author makes one of his dramatis personae the means of communicating his own sentiments to the public, somewhat more artificially than by a direct address to the readers. A pleasing French writer of fairy tales, Monsieur Pajon, author of the History of Prince Soly, has set a diverting example of the same machinery50, where he introduces the presiding Genius of the land of Romance conversing51 with one of the personages of the tale.
In this Introductory Epistle, the author communicates, in confidence, to Captain Clutterbuck, his sense that the White Lady had not met the taste of the times, and his reason for withdrawing her from the scene. The author did not deem it equally necessary to be candid respecting another alteration52. The Monastery was designed, at first, to have contained some supernatural agency, arising out of the fact, that Melrose had been the place of deposit of the great Robert Bruce’s heart. The writer shrunk, however, from filling up, in this particular, the sketch53 as it was originally traced; nor did he venture to resume, in continuation, the subject which he had left unattempted in the original work. Thus, the incident of the discovery of the heart, which occupies the greater part of the Introduction to the Monastery, is a mystery unnecessarily introduced, and which remains54 at last very imperfectly explained. In this particular, I was happy to shroud55 myself by the example of the author of “Caleb Williams,” who never condescends56 to inform us of the actual contents of that Iron Chest which makes such a figure in his interesting work, and gives the name to Mr. Colman’s drama.
The public had some claim to inquire into this matter, but it seemed indifferent policy in the author to give the explanation. For, whatever praise may be due to the ingenuity57 which brings to a general combination all the loose threads of a narrative58, like the knitter at the finishing of her stocking, I am greatly deceived if in many cases a superior advantage is not attained59, by the air of reality which the deficiency of explanation attaches to a work written on a different system. In life itself, many things befall every mortal, of which the individual never knows the real cause or origin; and were we to point out the most marked distinction between a real and a fictitious60 narrative, we would say, that the former in reference to the remote causes of the events it relates, is obscure, doubtful, and mysterious; whereas, in the latter case, it is a part of the author’s duty to afford satisfactory details upon the causes of the separate events he has recorded, and, in a word, to account for every thing. The reader, like Mungo in the Padlock, will not be satisfied with hearing what he is not made fully to comprehend.
I omitted, therefore, in the Introduction to the Abbot, any attempt to explain the previous story, or to apologize for unintelligibility61.
Neither would it have been prudent62 to have endeavoured to proclaim, in the Introduction to the Abbot, the real spring, by which I hoped it might attract a greater degree of interest than its immediate predecessor24. A taking title, or the announcement of a popular subject, is a recipe for success much in favour with booksellers, but which authors will not always find efficacious. The cause is worth a moment’s examination.
There occur in every country some peculiar63 historical characters, which are, like a spell or charm, sovereign to excite curiosity and attract attention, since every one in the slightest degree interested in the land which they belong to, has heard much of them, and longs to hear more. A tale turning on the fortunes of Alfred or Elizabeth in England, or of Wallace or Bruce in Scotland, is sure by the very announcement to excite public curiosity to a considerable degree, and ensure the publisher’s being relieved of the greater part of an impression, even before the contents of the work are known. This is of the last importance to the bookseller, who is at once, to use a technical phrase, “brought home,” all his outlay64 being repaid. But it is a different case with the author, since it cannot be denied that we are apt to feel least satisfied with the works of which we have been induced, by titles and laudatory65 advertisements, to entertain exaggerated expectations. The intention of the work has been anticipated, and misconceived or misrepresented, and although the difficulty of executing the work again reminds us of Hotspur’s task of “o’er-walking a current roaring loud,” yet the adventurer must look for more ridicule66 if he fails, than applause if he executes, his undertaking67.
Notwithstanding a risk, which should make authors pause ere they adopt a theme which, exciting general interest and curiosity, is often the preparative for disappointment, yet it would be an injudicious regulation which should deter68 the poet or painter from attempting to introduce historical portraits, merely from the difficulty of executing the task in a satisfactory manner. Something must be trusted to the generous impulse, which often thrusts an artist upon feats69 of which he knows the difficulty, while he trusts courage and exertion may afford the means of surmounting70 it.
It is especially when he is sensible of losing ground with the public, that an author may be justified71 in using with address, such selection of subject or title as is most likely to procure72 a rehearing. It was with these feelings of hope and apprehension73, that I venture to awaken74, in a work of fiction, the memory of Queen Mary, so interesting by her wit, her beauty, her misfortunes, and the mystery which still does, and probably always will, overhang her history. In doing so, I was aware that failure would be a conclusive75 disaster, so that my task was something like that of an enchanter who raises a spirit over whom he is uncertain of possessing an effectual control; and I naturally paid attention to such principles of composition, as I conceived were best suited to the historical novel.
Enough has been already said to explain the purpose of composing the Abbot. The historical references are, as usual, explained in the notes. That which relates to Queen Mary’s escape from Lochleven Castle, is a more minute account of that romantic adventure, than is to be found in the histories of the period.
Abbotsford ,
1st January , 1831.
1 monastery | |
n.修道院,僧院,寺院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 felicitous | |
adj.恰当的,巧妙的;n.恰当,贴切 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ebb | |
vi.衰退,减退;n.处于低潮,处于衰退状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 recede | |
vi.退(去),渐渐远去;向后倾斜,缩进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 unwilling | |
adj.不情愿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 incurred | |
[医]招致的,遭受的; incur的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 harping | |
n.反复述说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 chary | |
adj.谨慎的,细心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tract | |
n.传单,小册子,大片(土地或森林) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 enlisted | |
adj.应募入伍的v.(使)入伍, (使)参军( enlist的过去式和过去分词 );获得(帮助或支持) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 candid | |
adj.公正的,正直的;坦率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 tempted | |
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 prolific | |
adj.丰富的,大量的;多产的,富有创造力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 profusion | |
n.挥霍;丰富 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 crabs | |
n.蟹( crab的名词复数 );阴虱寄生病;蟹肉v.捕蟹( crab的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 attentively | |
adv.聚精会神地;周到地;谛;凝神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 exertion | |
n.尽力,努力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 miscarriages | |
流产( miscarriage的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 obliterated | |
v.除去( obliterate的过去式和过去分词 );涂去;擦掉;彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 recollected | |
adj.冷静的;镇定的;被回忆起的;沉思默想的v.记起,想起( recollect的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 predecessor | |
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 extrinsic | |
adj.外部的;不紧要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 sanguine | |
adj.充满希望的,乐观的,血红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 approbation | |
n.称赞;认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 renown | |
n.声誉,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 lottery | |
n.抽彩;碰运气的事,难于算计的事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 daunted | |
使(某人)气馁,威吓( daunt的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 aspire | |
vi.(to,after)渴望,追求,有志于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 incognito | |
adv.匿名地;n.隐姓埋名;adj.化装的,用假名的,隐匿姓名身份的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 shaft | |
n.(工具的)柄,杆状物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 simile | |
n.直喻,明喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 shafts | |
n.轴( shaft的名词复数 );(箭、高尔夫球棒等的)杆;通风井;一阵(疼痛、害怕等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 archer | |
n.射手,弓箭手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 inaccessible | |
adj.达不到的,难接近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 amend | |
vt.修改,修订,改进;n.[pl.]赔罪,赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 conversing | |
v.交谈,谈话( converse的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 alteration | |
n.变更,改变;蚀变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 sketch | |
n.草图;梗概;素描;v.素描;概述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 shroud | |
n.裹尸布,寿衣;罩,幕;vt.覆盖,隐藏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 condescends | |
屈尊,俯就( condescend的第三人称单数 ); 故意表示和蔼可亲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 ingenuity | |
n.别出心裁;善于发明创造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 fictitious | |
adj.虚构的,假设的;空头的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 unintelligibility | |
不可懂度,不清晰性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 outlay | |
n.费用,经费,支出;v.花费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 laudatory | |
adj.赞扬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 ridicule | |
v.讥讽,挖苦;n.嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 undertaking | |
n.保证,许诺,事业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 feats | |
功绩,伟业,技艺( feat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 surmounting | |
战胜( surmount的现在分词 ); 克服(困难); 居于…之上; 在…顶上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 awaken | |
vi.醒,觉醒;vt.唤醒,使觉醒,唤起,激起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 conclusive | |
adj.最后的,结论的;确凿的,消除怀疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |