What will he say about Literary Snobs1? has been a question, I make no doubt, often asked by the public. How can he let off his own profession? Will that truculent2 and unsparing monster who attacks the nobility, the clergy3, the army, and the ladies, indiscriminately, hesitate when the turn comes to EGORGER his own flesh and blood?
My dear and excellent querist, whom does the schoolmaster flog so resolutely4 as his own son? Didn’t Brutus chop his offspring’s head off? You have a very bad opinion indeed of the present state of literature and of literary men, if you fancy that any one of us would hesitate to stick a knife into his neighbour penman, if the latter’s death could do the State any service.
But the fact is, that in the literary profession THERE ARE NO SNOBS. Look round at the whole body of British men of letters; and I defy you to point out among them a single instance of vulgarity, or envy, or assumption.
Men and women, as far as I have known them, they are all modest in their demeanour, elegant in their manners, spotless in their lives, and honourable5 in their conduct to the world and to each other. You MAY, occasionally, it is true, hear one literary man abusing his brother; but why? Not in the least out of malice6; not at all from envy; merely from a sense of truth and public duty. Suppose, for instance, I, good-naturedly point out a blemish7 in my friend MR. PUNCH’S person, and say, MR. P. has a hump-back, and his nose and chin are more crooked8 than those features in the Apollo or Antinous, which we are accustomed to consider as our standards of beauty; does this argue malice on my part towards MR. PUNCH? Not in the least. It is the critic’s duty to point out defects as well as merits, and he invariably does his duty with utmost gentleness and candour.
An intelligent foreigner’s testimony10 about our manners is always worth having, and I think, in this respect the work of an eminent11 American, Mr. N. P. Willis is eminently12 valuable and impartial13. In his ‘History of Ernest Clay,’ a crack magazine-writer, the reader will get an exact account of the life of a popular man of letters in England. He is always the lion of society.
He takes the PAS of dukes and earls; all the nobility crowd to see him: I forget how many baronesses14 and duchesses fall in love with him. But on this subject let us hold our tongues. Modesty15 forbids that we should reveal the names of the heart-broken countesses and dear marchionesses who are pining for every one of the contributors in PUNCH.
If anybody wants to know how intimately authors are connected with the fashionable world, they have but to read the genteel novels. What refinement16 and delicacy17 pervades18 the works of Mrs. Barnaby! What delightful19 good company do you meet with in Mrs. Armytage! She seldom introduces you to anybody under a marquis! I don’t know anything more delicious than the pictures of genteel life in ‘Ten Thousand a Year,’ except perhaps the ‘Young Duke,’ and ‘Coningsby.’ There’s a modest grace about THEM, and an air of easy high fashion, which only belongs to blood, my dear Sir — to true blood.
And what linguists20 many of our writers are! Lady Bulwer, Lady Londonderry, Sir Edward himself — they write the French language with a luxurious21 elegance22 and ease which sets them far above their continental23 rivals, of whom not one (except Paul de Kock) knows a word of English.
And what Briton can read without enjoyment24 the works of James, so admirable for terseness25; and the playful humour and dazzling offhand26 lightness of Ainsworth? Among other humourists, one might glance at a Jerrold, the chivalrous27 advocate of Toryism and Church and State; an a Beckett, with a lightsome pen, but a savage28 earnestness of purpose; a Jeames, whose pure style, and wit unmingled with buffoonery, was relished29 by a congenial public.
Speaking of critics, perhaps there never was a review that has done so much for literature as the admirable QUARTERLY. It has its prejudices, to be sure, as which of us has not? It goes out of its way to abuse a great man, or lays mercilessly on to such pretenders as Keats and Tennyson; but, on the other hand, it is the friend of all young authors, and has marked and nurtured30 all the rising talent of the country. It is loved by everybody. There, again, is BLACKWOOD’S MAGAZINE— conspicuous31 for modest elegance and amiable32 satire33; that review never passes the bounds of politeness in a joke. It is the arbiter34 of manners; and, while gently exposing the foibles of Londoners (for whom the BEAUX ESPRITS of Edinburgh entertain a justifiable35 contempt), it is never coarse in its fun. The fiery36 enthusiasm of the ATHENAEUM is well known: and the bitter wit of the too difficult LITERARY GAZETTE. The EXAMINER is perhaps too timid, and the SPECTATOR too boisterous37 in its praise — but who can carp at these minor38 faults? No, no; the critics of England and the authors of England are unrivalled as a body; and hence it becomes impossible for us to find fault with them.
Above all, I never knew a man of letters ASHAMED OF HIS PROFESSION. Those who know us, know what an affectionate and brotherly spirit there is among us all. Sometimes one of us rises in the world: we never attack him or sneer39 at him under those circumstances, but rejoice to a man at his success. If Jones dines with a lord, Smith never says Jones is a courtier and cringer. Nor, on the other hand, does Jones, who is in the habit of frequenting the society of great people, give himself any airs on account of the company he keeps; but will leave a duke’s arm in Pall40 Mall to come over and speak to poor Brown, the young penny-a-liner.
That sense of equality and fraternity amongst authors has always struck me as one of the most amiable characteristics of the class. It is because we know and respect each other, that the world respects us so much; that we hold such a good position in society, and demean ourselves so irreproachably41 when there.
Literary persons are held in such esteem42 by the nation that about two of them have been absolutely invited to court during the present reign9; and it is probable that towards the end of the season, one or two will be asked to dinner by Sir Robert Peel.
They are such favourites with the public, that they are continually obliged to have their pictures taken and published; and one or two could be pointed43 out, of whom the nation insists upon having a fresh portrait every year. Nothing can be more gratifying than this proof of the affectionate regard which the people has for its instructors44.
Literature is held in such honour in England, that there is a sum of near twelve hundred pounds per annum set apart to pension deserving persons following that profession. And a great compliment this is, too, to the professors, and a proof of their generally prosperous and flourishing condition. They are generally so rich and thrifty45, that scarcely any money is wanted to help them.
If every word of this is true, how, I should like to know am I to write about Literary Snobs?
1 snobs | |
(谄上傲下的)势利小人( snob的名词复数 ); 自高自大者,自命不凡者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 truculent | |
adj.野蛮的,粗野的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 resolutely | |
adj.坚决地,果断地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 blemish | |
v.损害;玷污;瑕疵,缺点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 crooked | |
adj.弯曲的;不诚实的,狡猾的,不正当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 impartial | |
adj.(in,to)公正的,无偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 baronesses | |
n.女男爵( baroness的名词复数 );男爵夫人[寡妇] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 modesty | |
n.谦逊,虚心,端庄,稳重,羞怯,朴素 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 refinement | |
n.文雅;高尚;精美;精制;精炼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 delicacy | |
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 pervades | |
v.遍及,弥漫( pervade的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 linguists | |
n.通晓数国语言的人( linguist的名词复数 );语言学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 luxurious | |
adj.精美而昂贵的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 elegance | |
n.优雅;优美,雅致;精致,巧妙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 terseness | |
简洁,精练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 offhand | |
adj.临时,无准备的;随便,马虎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 chivalrous | |
adj.武士精神的;对女人彬彬有礼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 relished | |
v.欣赏( relish的过去式和过去分词 );从…获得乐趣;渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 nurtured | |
养育( nurture的过去式和过去分词 ); 培育; 滋长; 助长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 amiable | |
adj.和蔼可亲的,友善的,亲切的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 arbiter | |
n.仲裁人,公断人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 justifiable | |
adj.有理由的,无可非议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 fiery | |
adj.燃烧着的,火红的;暴躁的;激烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 boisterous | |
adj.喧闹的,欢闹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 sneer | |
v.轻蔑;嘲笑;n.嘲笑,讥讽的言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 pall | |
v.覆盖,使平淡无味;n.柩衣,棺罩;棺材;帷幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 irreproachably | |
adv.不可非难地,无过失地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 esteem | |
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 instructors | |
指导者,教师( instructor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 thrifty | |
adj.节俭的;兴旺的;健壮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |