How it is Necessary for One Man Alone in Desiring to Organize a New Republic to Reform its Institutions Entirely1 Outside the Ancient Ones
And it may appear perhaps to some that I have gone too far into Roman history, not having yet made any mention of the organizers of this Republic, or of [having regard for] her institutions, her religion, and her military establishment. And therefore, not wanting to keep in suspense2 the minds of those who want to understand these matters, I say, that many perhaps should judge it a bad example that the founder3 of a civil society, as Romulus was, should first have killed his brother, then have consented to the death of Titus Tatius, a Sabine, who had been chosen by him to share the Kingdom; because of which it might be judged that the citizens could, from ambition and the desire to rule, with the authority of their Prince, attack those who should be opposed to their authority. Which opinion would be correct, if the object he had in mind in causing that homicide should be considered. But this must be assumed, as a general rule, that it never or rarely occurs that some Republic or Kingdom is well organized from the beginning, or its institutions entirely reformed a new, unless it is arranged by one [individual only]: rather it is necessary that the only one who carries it out should be he who on whose mind such an organization depends. A prudent4 Organizer of a Republic, therefore, who has in mind to want to promote, not himself, but the common good, and not his own succession but his [common] country, ought to endeavor to have the authority alone: and a wise planner will never reprimand anyone for any extraordinary activity that he should employ either in the establishment of a Kingdom or in constituting a Republic. It is well then, when the deed accuses him, the result should excuse him; and when it is good, as that of Romulus, he will always be excused; for he ought to be reprehended5 who is violent in order to destroy, and not he who does so for beneficial reasons. He ought, however, to be so prudent and wise that the authority which he has assumed, he will not leave to his heirs [or] any other: for men being more prone6 to evil than to good, his successor could employ for reasons of ambition that which should be employed for virtuous7 reasons by him. In addition to this, even if one is adept8 at organizing, the thing organized will not endure long if its [administration] remains9 only on the shoulders of one individual, but it is good when it remains in the care of many, and thus there will be many to sustain it. As the organization of anything cannot be made by many because of the diverse opinions that exist among them, yet having once understood this, they will not agree to forego it. And that Romulus merited to be excused for the death of his brother and that of his companion, and that what he had done he did for the common good and not for his own ambition, is shown by his immediate10 institution of a Senate with which he should consult, and according to the opinions of which he would make his decision. And whoever considers well the authority which Romulus reserved for himself, will see that he did not reserve anything else other than the command of the army when war was decided11 upon, and of convening12 the Senate. This was seen at that time when Rome became free after the driving out of the Tarquins, where there was no other innovation made on the ancient institutions except that in place of an hereditary13 King there should be two Consuls14 [elected] each year. Which gives testimony15 that all the institutions at the origin of that City were more in conformity16 with a free and civil society than with an absolute and tyrannical one.
Infinite examples could be given in corroboration17 of the things mentioned above, such as Moses, Lycurgus, Solon, and other founders18 of Kingdoms and Republics, who were able to formulate19 laws for the common good [only] by assigning the [necessary] authority to themselves: but I want to omit these as they are already well known. I will refer only to one not so well known, but which should be given consideration by those who desire to be institutors of good laws, [and], this is that of Agis, King of Sparta, who desiring to bring the Spartans20 back to those limits which the laws of Lycurgus had delimited for them, [and], it seeming to him that by deviating22 in part from them his City had lost much of that ancient virtu, and consequently her power and dominion23, was at once killed by Spartan21 Ephors as a man who wanted to become a Tyrant24. But Cleomenes succeeding him in the Kingdom, there arose in him the same desire from [reading] the records and writings of Agis that he found, in which his thoughts and intentions were seen, [and] he recognized that he could not render this good to his country, unless he should become alone in authority, as it seemed to him he would not be able because of the ambitions of men to provide the good for the many against the desires of the few: and seizing a convenient opportunity had all the Ephors killed and those who could oppose him: after which he completely restored the laws of Lycurgus. This decision helped to revive Sparta and give to Cleomene that reputation which was [equal] to that of Lycurgus, if it had not been for the power of Macedonia and the weakness of the other Greek Republics. For after this establishment [of the laws] he was soon assaulted by the Macedonians, and finding that by herself [Sparta] was inferior in strength, and not having anyone to whom he could have recourse, he was defeated, and his plans [no matter how just and laudable] remained incompleted. Considering all these things, therefore, I conclude that to establish a Republic it is necessary that one must be alone, and Romulus merits to be excused and not censured25 for the death of Remus and of Tatius.
1 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 suspense | |
n.(对可能发生的事)紧张感,担心,挂虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 reprehended | |
v.斥责,指摘,责备( reprehend的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prone | |
adj.(to)易于…的,很可能…的;俯卧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 adept | |
adj.老练的,精通的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 convening | |
召开( convene的现在分词 ); 召集; (为正式会议而)聚集; 集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 consuls | |
领事( consul的名词复数 ); (古罗马共和国时期)执政官 (古罗马共和国及其军队的最高首长,同时共有两位,每年选举一次) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 corroboration | |
n.进一步的证实,进一步的证据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 formulate | |
v.用公式表示;规划;设计;系统地阐述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 spartans | |
n.斯巴达(spartan的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 spartan | |
adj.简朴的,刻苦的;n.斯巴达;斯巴达式的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 deviating | |
v.偏离,越轨( deviate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 dominion | |
n.统治,管辖,支配权;领土,版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 tyrant | |
n.暴君,专制的君主,残暴的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 censured | |
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的过去式 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |