The beginning of philosophy to him at least who enters on it in the right way and by the door, is a consciousness of his own weakness and inability about necessary things. For we come into the world with no natural notion of a right-angled triangle, or of a diesis, or of a half tone; but we learn each of these things by a certain transmission according to art; and for this reason those who do not know them, do not think that they know them. But as to good and evil, and beautiful and ugly, and becoming and unbecoming, and happiness and misfortune, and proper and improper1, and what we ought to do and what we ought not to do, whoever came into the world without having an innate2 idea of them? Wherefore we all use these names, and we endeavor to fit the preconceptions to the several cases thus: “He has done well, he has not done well; he has done as he ought, not as he ought; he has been unfortunate, he has been fortunate; he is unjust, he is just”: who does not use these names? who among us defers3 the use of them till he has learned them, as he defers the use of the words about lines or sounds? And the cause of this is that we come into the world already taught as it were by nature some things on this matter, and proceeding4 from these we have added to them self-conceit5. “For why,” a man says, “do I not know the beautiful and the ugly? Have I not the notion of it?” You have. “Do I not adapt it to particulars?” You do. “Do I not then adapt it properly?” In that lies the whole question; and conceit is added here. For, beginning from these things which are admitted, men proceed to that which is matter of dispute by means of unsuitable adaptation; for if they possessed6 this power of adaptation in addition to those things, what would hinder them from being perfect? But now since you think that you properly adapt the preconceptions to the particulars, tell me whence you derive7 this. Because I think so. But it does not seem so to another, and he thinks that he also makes a proper adaptation; or does he not think so? He does think so. Is it possible then that both of you can properly apply the preconceptions to things about which you have contrary opinions? It is not possible. Can you then show us anything better toward adapting the preconceptions beyond your thinking that you do? Does the madman do any other things than the things as in which seem to him right? Is then this criterion for him also? It is not sufficient. Come then to something which is superior to seeming. What is this?
Observe, this is the beginning of philosophy, a perception of the disagreement of men with one another, and an inquiry8 into the cause of the disagreement, and a condemnation9 and distrust of that which only “seems,” and a certain investigation10 of that which “seems” whether it “seems” rightly, and a discovery of some rule, as we have discovered a balance in the determination of weights, and a carpenter’s rule in the case of straight and crooked11 things. This is the beginning of philosophy. “Must we say that all thins are right which seem so to all?” And how is it possible that contradictions can be right? “Not all then, but all which seem to us to be right.” How more to you than those which seem right to the Syrians? why more than what seem right to the Egyptians? why more than what seems right to me or to any other man? “Not at all more.” What then “seems” to every man is not sufficient for determining what “is”; for neither in the case of weights or measures are we satisfied with the bare appearance, but in each case we have discovered a certain rule. In this matter then is there no rule certain to what “seems?” And how is it possible that the most necessary things among men should have no sign, and be incapable12 of being discovered? There is then some rule. And why then do we not seek the rule and discover it, and afterward13 use it without varying from it, not even stretching out the finger without it? For this, I think, is that which when it is discovered cures of their madness those who use mere14 “seeming” as a measure, and misuse15 it; so that for the future proceeding from certain things known and made clear we may use in the case of particular things the preconceptions which are distinctly fixed16.
What is the matter presented to us about which we are inquiring? “Pleasure.” Subject it to the rule, throw it into the balance. Ought the good to be such a thing that it is fit that we have confidence in it? “Yes.” And in which we ought to confide17? “It ought to be.” Is it fit to trust to anything which is insecure? “No.” Is then pleasure anything secure? “No.” Take it then and throw it out of the scale, and drive it far away from the place of good things. But if you are not sharp-sighted, and one balance is not enough for you, bring another. Is it fit to be elated over what is good? “Yes.” Is it proper then to be elated over present pleasure? See that you do not say that it is proper; but if you do, I shall then not think you are worthy18 even of the balance. Thus things are tested and weighed when the rules are ready. And to philosophize is this, to examine and confirm the rules; and then to use them when they are known is the act of a wise and good man.
1 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 innate | |
adj.天生的,固有的,天赋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 defers | |
v.拖延,延缓,推迟( defer的第三人称单数 );服从某人的意愿,遵从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 conceit | |
n.自负,自高自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 condemnation | |
n.谴责; 定罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 crooked | |
adj.弯曲的;不诚实的,狡猾的,不正当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 afterward | |
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 misuse | |
n.误用,滥用;vt.误用,滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 confide | |
v.向某人吐露秘密 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |