Eugene began to read haltingly, with the difficulty and embarrassed constraint1 of a young man just beginning to test his powers, exhibiting his talents to the public for the first time, and torn by all the anguish2, hope, and fear, the proud incertitude3 of youth.
It was a play called “Mannerhouse,” a title which itself might reveal the whole nature of his error — and its subject was the decline and fall and ultimate extinction4 of a proud old family of the Southern aristocracy in the years that followed the Civil War, the ultimate decay of all its fortunes and the final acquisition of its proud estate, the grand old columned house that gave the play its name, by a vulgar, coarse and mean, but immensely able member of the rising “lower class.”
This theme — which, in its general form and implications, was probably influenced a good deal by The Cherry Orchard5 of Chekhov — was written in a somewhat mixed mood of romantic sentiment, Byronic irony6, and sardonic7 realism. The hero was a rather Byronic character, a fellow who concealed8 his dark and tender poetry under the mask of a sardonic humour; the love story was coloured by defeat and error and departure, and the hero’s final return “years later,” a lonely and nameless wanderer, battered9 by the world and the wreckage10 of his life, to the old ruined house in which already the rasping note of the wrecker’s crew was audible, was tempered by the romantic gallantry of Cyrano. The final meeting with the girl — the woman that he loved — their ultimate gallant11 resignation to fate and age and destiny — was wholly Cyranoic; and the final scene, in which the gigantic faithful negro slave — now an old man, almost blind, but with the savage12 loyalty13 and majesty14 of a race of African kings from whom he is descended15 — wraps his great arms around the rotting central column of the old ruined house, snaps it in two with a last convulsion of his dying strength, and brings the whole ruined temple thundering down to bury his beloved master, his hated “poor white” enemy the new owner, and himself, beneath its ruins — was obviously a product of the Samson legend.
In spite of this, there was good stuff in the play, dramatic conflict, moving pageantry. The character of the hard, grasping but immensely able materialist16 of “the lower class,” the newer South, was well realized — and had been derived17 from the character of the youth’s own uncle, William Pentland. The scenes between the hero and his father — the leonine and magnificently heroic “General”— were also good; as were those between the hero and Porter, the poor-white capitalist. Even in these romantic, grandly-mannered scenes he had already begun to use some of the powerful and inimitable materials of life itself and of his own experience: the speech of Porter was the plain, rich, pungent18, earthly, strongly coloured speech of his mother, of his uncle William Pentland, and of the Pentland tribe.
But the scenes between the hero and the girl were less successful: the character of the girl was shadowy and uncertain — a kind of phantasmal combination of the characters of Roxane in Cyrano, and Ophelia — and her sweet romantic loveliness, the yearning19 tenderness of her pure love, did not provide a convincing foil and balance for the sardonic humour, the bad and almost brutal20 volume of wit, with which the hero marked his pain and love and bitterness and repulsed21 her advances. (This scene, by the way, was undoubtedly22 influenced a great deal by the Hamlet and Ophelia situation.)
Likewise — in various and interesting ways, what he had read and seen and actually experienced had shaped the tone and temper of his play: the character of the pompous23 and banal24 old “Major”— the “General’s” contemporary and friend and the father of the heroine — and his conversations with the hero, in which his conventional and pompous character is made the butt25 for the biting and sardonic gibes26 of the latter, were also evidently strongly coloured with the influence of Polonius and Hamlet. But there was good stuff in these scenes as well; considerable originality27 and naturalness were shown in the characterization of the old “Major”: he was, for example, trying to support the tottering28 fortune of a small military school which his family had established several generations before, and whose gigantic futility29, amid this decline of a ruined order and a vanquished30 system was, in the years after the war, ironically apparent. There was, in fact, much telling satire31 in this situation, and on the whole it was well managed. Moreover, its “modern” implications were evident: it suggested, for example, the Southerner’s pitiable devotion to a gaudy32 uniform and military trappings, the profusion33 of ugly, trivial, cheap and brutal little “military schools” that cover the whole South, even to the present day, like an ugly rash, and whose “You furnish the boy — we send back the man” philosophy is nauseous in its hypocrisy34, dishonesty, and cheap pretence35.
There was much more that was good and pungent and original in these scenes between the “Major” and the hero: a great deal of the falseness, hypocrisy and sentimentality of the South was polished off in these episodes, and “the war”— the Civil War — was used effectively as a stalking-horse to satirize36 the great World War of modern times. There was, for example, a good, and original — on the whole, a very true — variation of the Youth-and-Age, Old Man–Young Man conflict that was evident at that period, and that provided the material of so many books and plays and poems of the time.
In these scenes, it was very forcefully and amusingly shown that the conflict between youth and age had in it an element of mutual37 hypocrisy, a kind of mutual acceptance of a literary game about youth and age which both young and old knew in their hearts was false, but which both played.
Thus when the old “Major” would heave a melancholy38 sigh, and shaking his beard with a doleful and hypocritical regret would say:
“Ah yes, my boy! . . . We old men have made a sad mess of this world. . . . We have betrayed our trust, and shown ourselves unworthy of the confidence you young men have reposed39 in us. . . . We were given the opportunity of making the world a better place in which to live and we have left nothing but ruin, poverty, and misery41 wherever we went — we have left the world in ashes. . . . Now it is for you young men of the world — for youth — glorious, brave and noble-hearted youth —”
“Ah, youth, youth,” the hero would murmur42 at this point with a sardonic humour that of course went unnoticed by the pompous old fool to whom it was uttered — and the Major would nod his head in agreement and go on —
“Yes, youth — brave, generous and devoted43 youth — it remains44 for youth to repair the damage that we old men have done, to bind45 up the nation’s broken wounds, to see to it that the world be made into a fit place for their children to live in, to see that —”
“Government of the people, by the people and for the people,” the hero would sardonically46 supply.
“Yes,” the old Major would agree, “— and that the children of the coming generation may not look at you, as you can look at us, and say —‘What have you done, old men, with your inheritance? What kind of world are you leaving behind you for us YOUNG men to inherit? How can you look us in the eyes, old men, when you know that you have been unworthy of your sacred trust — that the young men of the world have been foully47 tricked, betrayed, dishonoured48 by you old men’—”
“Why, Major!” the hero would now cry, in mock astonishment49, as he ironically applauded. “— This is eloquence50! Hear hear! . . . And you are right! Major, you are right! The young men of the world have been betrayed and tricked! Not only tricked — but tr-r-ricked! . . . And by whom?” he would inquire with sardonic rhetoric51. “Why, by these false, lying, greedy, hypocritical old men who have had the whole world in their keeping and who have reduced it to a shambles52 for our inheritance! . . . Major, who made the war? Who SENT us forth53 to war? . . . Why, these old, false, lying, greedy men, of course! . . . And who fought the war? . . . Why, these brave, gallant, devoted, noble-spirited young men, of course! . . . And why did you old men send us forth to war, Major? . . . Why, to further your own rapacity54, to protect your own ill-gotten wealth, to conquer, ravage55, and invade for your own enrichment. . . . And how did we go to war, Major? Why, with faith and trust and the purity of a high conviction. . . . And how did we come back from war? With hell in our eyes. . . . We young men always go to war with faith and trust and the purity of a high conviction. . . . And we always come back with hell in our eyes! Why, Major? . . . Why, because you false, lying, greedy, selfish, and hypocritical old men of the world have lied to us. . . . You always lie to us. And how, Major, in what way do you lie to us? . . . Why, Major,” he said solemnly, “you tell us that war is beautiful, ideal, and heroic — that we are going forth to fight for pure ideals, noble faith. . . . And what do we find, Major? Why,” he said, as his voice sank to an ironically solemn whisper —“we find that war is really UGLY— is really cruel — horrible — base. . . . Why, Major, do you know what we young men find when we go to war? We find that men in war actually KILL one another. . . . Yes, sir,” he would whisper solemnly, “ . . . they SHOOT one another — they blow one another’s brains out — THAT’S what they do — why, it’s murder, Major — sheer cold-blooded murder — it’s not what you said it was at all — and all of it because you old greedy, lying, selfish men who make the wars have lied to us and tr-r-ricked us all along!”
“Ah, my boy,” the old “Major” would answer sorrowfully —“it is a grievous charge you make against us — but I fear — I fear,” here his voice would sink to a dejected whisper —“I fear that it is just.”
In this way, a telling and satiric56 irony was derived from this scene, which was well handled and might have been effective on the stage.
But the most effective scene of all, perhaps, was in the prologue57 of this play: here the scene was really splendid, thrilling in its dramatic pageantry, and undoubtedly would have been a very good and moving one upon a stage. The scene was on a hill and showed the building of the great white house — really the founding of a whole society. Before the unfinished house, a gun held cocked and ready in his hands, was standing58 the stern and silent figure of its founder59. And before him, up and down the hill, and in and out of the unfinished house, and past its great unfinished columns, were moving two silent and unceasing files of slaves, powerful black men stripped naked to the waist, bearing upon their heads the heavy burdens of material that would go into the house. And from the house there comes a sound of constant hammering, and night comes, there are the flares60 of watchfires and the swift and cat-like passing of the great black forms. A moment’s flare61 of insurrection, the spring of a great negro at the stern and lonely figure of the man, the flash of a knife, and the rebel falls, knocked senseless by a blow from the stock of the master’s gun.
Then, another white man from the neighbouring town — the minister: the minister’s low persuasive62 voice urging the man to see the crime of slavery, quoting the Scriptures63 with a telling aptness, urging him to repent64, to join the life of town and church, to “come to God” . . . And the quiet and inflexible65 answer of the master: “I must build my home.”
And nothing finally but night and dullness; the great figures of the slaves pad past in darkness, as noiseless as cats, and from the mystery of night there rises now the wailing66 chant of all the jungle, the lamentation67 of man’s life of toil68 and grief and bitter labour, the chant of the slave.
This was a fine scene, and should have been beautiful and moving on a stage.
From this description it will be seen how the young man’s play was made up both of good and bad, how strongly it was marked by the varied69 influence of his reading and idolatry — by Shakespeare, Chekhov, Shaw, Rostand, the Bible — and how he had also already begun to use some of the materials of his own life and feeling and experience, how even in this groping and uncertain play, some of the real grandeur70, beauty, terror, and unuttered loneliness of America was apparent.
Thus the play, with all its faults and imitations, really did illustrate71, as few things else could do, the confused incertitude and the flashes of blind but powerful intuition, which mark the artist’s early life here in America, and for this reason chiefly the play was interesting.
And feeling this incertitude as he sat down to read the play — that feeling mixed of hope, of fear, of quivering apprehension72 which the artist feels when for the first time he releases his work from the lonely prison of creation and lets it go then, irrevocably, to stand upon its own feet, meet the naked eye of the great world without protection, and stand or fall upon its own merits — feeling this fatality73 of release, this irrevocable finality of action, he began to read the play in a halting, embarrassed, and almost inaudible tone, full of the proud and desperate hope, the trembling apprehension, the almost truculent74 hostility75 towards imaginary detractors which every young man feels at such a time.
He sensed quickly that his fears were groundless. No man ever had a more generous, enthusiastic and devoted following than he had that morning in the presence of these two fine young people — Joel Pierce and his sister Rosalind.
He saw — or rather FELT at once — their rapt and fascinated attentiveness76. Joel sat, his gaunt figure hinged forward on his knees, in an attitude of tense, motionless and utterly77 silent interest: from time to time as the young dramatist glanced up from his great sheaf of written manuscript he could see Joel’s lean gaunt face fixed78 on him, uplifted, with its strangely pure and radiant eagerness, and Rosalind, her warm and strong young hands clasped quietly, folded in her lap, her warm and lovely face flushed with excitement, her eyes luminous79, vague and tender, as if she were really in a theatre seeing the figures in the play pass before her invested in all the magic that the stage could give to them, displayed an interest that was more relaxed and more abstracted than her brother’s, but none the less absorbed.
The sense and sight and assurance of these things acted like a powerful and gloriously intoxicating80 liquor on his heart and mind and spirit. He felt an overpowering surge of warm affection, proud and tender gratefulness towards Joel and his sister. It seemed to him that they were the finest people he had ever known — the most generous, the truest, highest, and the loyalest — and the knowledge that they liked his play — were in fact conquered and possessed81, brought out of themselves and laid under the play’s power and magic — his OWN power and magic — overwhelmed him for a moment with a feeling of the purest, highest, and most glorious happiness that life can yield — the happiness that is at once the most selfish and the most selfless — the happiness of the artist when he sees that his work has been found good, has for itself a place of honour, glory, and proud esteem82 in the hearts of men, and has wrought83 upon their lives the spell of its enchantment84. At that instant he saw, in one blaze of light, an image of unutterable conviction, the reason why the artist works and lives and has his being — the reward he seeks — the only reward he really cares about, without which there is nothing. It is to snare85 the spirits of mankind in nets of magic, to make his life prevail through his creation, to wreak86 the vision of his life, the rude and painful substance of his own experience, into the congruence of blazing and enchanted87 images that are themselves the core of life, the essential pattern whence all other things proceed, the kernel88 of eternity89. This is the reason that the artist lives and works and has his being: that from life’s clay and his own nature, and from his father’s common earth of toil and sweat and violence and error and bitter anguish, he may distil90 the beauty of an everlasting91 form, enslave and conquer man by his enchantment, cast his spell across the generations, beat death down upon his knees, kill death utterly, and fix eternity with the grappling-hooks of his own art. His life is soul-hydroptic with a quenchless93 thirst for glory, and his spirit tortured by the anguish of possession — the intolerable desire to fix eternally in the patterns of an indestructible form a single moment of man’s living, a single moment of life’s beauty, passion, and unutterable eloquence, that passes, flames and goes, slipping for ever through our fingers with time’s sanded drop, flowing for ever from our desperate grasp even as a river flows and never can be held. This is the artist, then — life’s hungry man, the glutton94 of eternity, beauty’s miser40, glory’s slave — and to do these things, to get the reward for which he thirsts, with his own immortality95 to beat and conquer life, enslave mankind, utterly to possess and capture beauty he will do anything, use anything, destroy anything — be ruthless, murderous and destructive, cold and cruel and merciless as hell to get the thing he wants, achieve the thing he values and must do or die.
He is at once life’s monstrous96 outcast and life’s beauty-drunken lover, man’s bloody97, ruthless, pitiless and utterly relentless98 enemy, and the best friend that mankind ever had: a creature compact of the most selfish, base, ignoble99, vicious, cruel and unrighteous passions that man’s life can fathom100 or the world contain, and a creature whose life with all its toil and sweat and bitter anguish is the highest, grandest, noblest, and the most unselfish, the most superbly happy, good and fortunate life that men can know, or any man attain101. He is the tongue of his unuttered brothers, he is the language of man’s buried heart, he is man’s music and life’s great discoverer, the eye that sees, the key that can unlock, the tongue that will express the buried treasure in the hearts of men, that all men know and that no man has a language for — and at the end he is his father’s son, shaped from his father’s earth of blood and sweat and toil and bitter agony: he is at once, therefore, the parent and the son of life, and in him life and all man’s nature are compact; he is most like man in his very differences, he is what all men are and what not one man in a million ever is; and he has all, knows all, sees all that any man on earth can see and hear and know.
This knowledge came to him that morning as he read the play that he had written to his two friends: as he went on with his reading, and felt with a proud triumphant102 joy and happiness the sense of their devotion, his voice grew strong and confident, the scenes and words and people of the play began to flame and pulse and live with his own passion — the whole play moved across his vision in flaming images of beauty, truth and loveliness, his spirit rose on the powerful wings of a jubilant conviction, a tremendous happiness, his heart beat like a hammer-stroke and seemed to ring against his ribs103 with every blow the music of this certitude.
It took him about two hours to read the play: when he finished he felt a sense of triumphant finality, an immense and joyful104 peace within him, and he waited for them to speak. For a moment there was utter stillness: Joel sat bent105 forward in the same position, his head supported by his lean hand; Rosalind sat quietly; neither moved an inch. In a moment Joel spoke106, nodding his head and speaking with a kind of matter-of-fact assertiveness107 that was far more wonderful and thrilling than any idolatrous warmth of praise could have been:
“Yes,” he whispered, nodding his head thoughtfully — “it’s as good as The Cherry Orchard — I like it better, myself — but it’s as good.” His manner now did take on an electric energy: he straightened sharply, and speaking almost sternly, with a blazing earnestness of conviction, he looked his friend in the eyes, and cried: “Eugene! . . . It’s simply magnificent! . . . It’s EASILY the greatest play anyone in this country ever wrote. . . . There’s nothing else to touch it . . . it’s MILES ahead of O’Neill . . . it’s . . . it’s as good as Cyrano, and you’ve got to admit,” he said, nodding his head decisively, “ . . . that’s pretty great. . . . Cyrano’s pretty swell,” he whispered, “ . . . And those scenes between the boy and the old ‘Major’ . . . they’re simply grand,” he whispered. “I mean, I didn’t know you had it in you . . . that kind of writing, the satiric kind. . . . But it’s . . . it’s,” his face flushed, he nodded his head doggedly108, and almost grimly, as if willing to stand up for his conviction against the whole world, “it’s . . . it’s as good as SHAW!” And he laughed suddenly his radiant, soundless laugh and whispered drolly109, “ . . . And when I say anything’s as good as Shaw . . . you’ve got to admit that’s going pretty far for me. . . . Ros’,” he said quietly, turning to the girl, “what do you think? . . . Don’t you think it’s pretty grand?”
For a moment she did not answer; her eyes were luminous as stars and far away.
“Oh,” she said presently in her low and sweet and lovely young voice, “it’s wonderful. . . . It’s the most gloriously beautiful thing I ever heard. . . . Darling,” she said, and took his hand between her strong, warm and living hands, as she had done the night before, “ . . . you are a great man . . . a great writer. . . . I am so proud and happy to have known you . . . to be allowed to hear your play.”
He felt the overpowering, thrilling happiness and joy, the blind speechless gratefulness, and the helpless and agonizing110 embarrassment111 that a young man feels at a moment like this. He did not know what to say, what to do, how to express the gratefulness, the affection, the tenderness that he felt towards them; he turned to Joel, his mouth moving wordlessly and helplessly, and could say nothing, he made a baffled and inarticulate movement of the hands, and ended up by putting his arms around Rosalind and hugging her in a clumsy, helpless fashion, which was perhaps as good a thing as he could do, and said all he wished to say.
It was not what these two young people had said to him that gave the moment a strange imperishable loveliness. Even in the blind surge of joy and happiness that swept over him and made him passionately112 want to believe that his play was as good as Joel and his sister said it was, that he was really the great man, the great writer they had called him, a grain of judgment113 remained and saved him from an utter self-deception. And curiously114, for that very reason, his joy was somehow greater, his feeling of triumphant happiness sweeter than if what they had said were true. For in the very idolatry of their devotion, the enthusiastic exaggeration of their praise, there was all the blind but noble loyalty of youth, the beautiful and generous admiration115 of youth, that is so fine, so good, so high, so proud with faith and confidence and loyalty, and because of this, so right. It was for this reason that, even after years had passed and he had perhaps accomplished116 better work, earned more valid117 praise, he would yet remember that morning with a peculiar118 sense of proud and tender gratefulness. It brought back to him, as nothing else on earth could do, the beauty and the innocence119 of youth, the extravagance of its blind devotion that is so mistaken and so wonderful, the generous enthusiasm of its loyal faith that is so wrong and yet so right, its noble sincerity120 that burns brightly even in its grievous error, and that is somehow more true than fact, more real than glory, and more lasting92 and more precious than man’s fame.
点击收听单词发音
1 constraint | |
n.(on)约束,限制;限制(或约束)性的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 anguish | |
n.(尤指心灵上的)极度痛苦,烦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 incertitude | |
n.疑惑,不确定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 orchard | |
n.果园,果园里的全部果树,(美俚)棒球场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 sardonic | |
adj.嘲笑的,冷笑的,讥讽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 battered | |
adj.磨损的;v.连续猛击;磨损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 wreckage | |
n.(失事飞机等的)残骸,破坏,毁坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 gallant | |
adj.英勇的,豪侠的;(向女人)献殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 majesty | |
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 descended | |
a.为...后裔的,出身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 materialist | |
n. 唯物主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 pungent | |
adj.(气味、味道)刺激性的,辛辣的;尖锐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 yearning | |
a.渴望的;向往的;怀念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 repulsed | |
v.击退( repulse的过去式和过去分词 );驳斥;拒绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 pompous | |
adj.傲慢的,自大的;夸大的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 banal | |
adj.陈腐的,平庸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 butt | |
n.笑柄;烟蒂;枪托;臀部;v.用头撞或顶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 gibes | |
vi.嘲笑,嘲弄(gibe的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 tottering | |
adj.蹒跚的,动摇的v.走得或动得不稳( totter的现在分词 );踉跄;蹒跚;摇摇欲坠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 futility | |
n.无用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 gaudy | |
adj.华而不实的;俗丽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 profusion | |
n.挥霍;丰富 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 pretence | |
n.假装,作假;借口,口实;虚伪;虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 satirize | |
v.讽刺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 reposed | |
v.将(手臂等)靠在某人(某物)上( repose的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 miser | |
n.守财奴,吝啬鬼 (adj.miserly) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 murmur | |
n.低语,低声的怨言;v.低语,低声而言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 bind | |
vt.捆,包扎;装订;约束;使凝固;vi.变硬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 sardonically | |
adv.讽刺地,冷嘲地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 foully | |
ad.卑鄙地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 dishonoured | |
a.不光彩的,不名誉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 astonishment | |
n.惊奇,惊异 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 eloquence | |
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 shambles | |
n.混乱之处;废墟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 rapacity | |
n.贪婪,贪心,劫掠的欲望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 ravage | |
vt.使...荒废,破坏...;n.破坏,掠夺,荒废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 satiric | |
adj.讽刺的,挖苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 prologue | |
n.开场白,序言;开端,序幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 flares | |
n.喇叭裤v.(使)闪耀( flare的第三人称单数 );(使)(船舷)外倾;(使)鼻孔张大;(使)(衣裙、酒杯等)呈喇叭形展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 flare | |
v.闪耀,闪烁;n.潮红;突发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 persuasive | |
adj.有说服力的,能说得使人相信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 scriptures | |
经文,圣典( scripture的名词复数 ); 经典 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 repent | |
v.悔悟,悔改,忏悔,后悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 inflexible | |
adj.不可改变的,不受影响的,不屈服的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 wailing | |
v.哭叫,哀号( wail的现在分词 );沱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 lamentation | |
n.悲叹,哀悼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 toil | |
vi.辛劳工作,艰难地行动;n.苦工,难事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 grandeur | |
n.伟大,崇高,宏伟,庄严,豪华 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 fatality | |
n.不幸,灾祸,天命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 truculent | |
adj.野蛮的,粗野的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 hostility | |
n.敌对,敌意;抵制[pl.]交战,战争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 attentiveness | |
[医]注意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 intoxicating | |
a. 醉人的,使人兴奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 esteem | |
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 wrought | |
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 enchantment | |
n.迷惑,妖术,魅力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 snare | |
n.陷阱,诱惑,圈套;(去除息肉或者肿瘤的)勒除器;响弦,小军鼓;vt.以陷阱捕获,诱惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 wreak | |
v.发泄;报复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 enchanted | |
adj. 被施魔法的,陶醉的,入迷的 动词enchant的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 kernel | |
n.(果实的)核,仁;(问题)的中心,核心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 distil | |
vt.蒸馏;提取…的精华,精选出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 lasting | |
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 quenchless | |
不可熄灭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 glutton | |
n.贪食者,好食者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 bloody | |
adj.非常的的;流血的;残忍的;adv.很;vt.血染 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 relentless | |
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 ignoble | |
adj.不光彩的,卑鄙的;可耻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 fathom | |
v.领悟,彻底了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 triumphant | |
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 ribs | |
n.肋骨( rib的名词复数 );(船或屋顶等的)肋拱;肋骨状的东西;(织物的)凸条花纹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 joyful | |
adj.欢乐的,令人欢欣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 assertiveness | |
n.过分自信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 doggedly | |
adv.顽强地,固执地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 drolly | |
adv.古里古怪地;滑稽地;幽默地;诙谐地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 agonizing | |
adj.痛苦难忍的;使人苦恼的v.使极度痛苦;折磨(agonize的ing形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 embarrassment | |
n.尴尬;使人为难的人(事物);障碍;窘迫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 passionately | |
ad.热烈地,激烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 valid | |
adj.有确实根据的;有效的;正当的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 sincerity | |
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |