But the projectile1 had passed the enceinte of Tycho, and Barbicane and his two companions watched with scrupulous2 attention the brilliant rays which the celebrated3 mountain shed so curiously4 over the horizon.
What was this radiant glory? What geological phenomenon had designed these ardent5 beams? This question occupied Barbicane’s mind.
Under his eyes ran in all directions luminous6 furrows7, raised at the edges and concave in the center, some twelve miles, others thirty miles broad. These brilliant trains extended in some places to within 600 miles of Tycho, and seemed to cover, particularly toward the east, the northeast and the north, the half of the southern hemisphere. One of these jets extended as far as the circle of Neander, situated8 on the 40th meridian9. Another, by a slight curve, furrowed10 the “Sea of Nectar,” breaking against the chain of Pyrenees, after a circuit of 800 miles. Others, toward the west, covered the “Sea of Clouds” and the “Sea of Humors” with a luminous network. What was the origin of these sparkling rays, which shone on the plains as well as on the reliefs, at whatever height they might be? All started from a common center, the crater11 of Tycho. They sprang from him. Herschel attributed their brilliancy to currents of lava12 congealed13 by the cold; an opinion, however, which has not been generally adopted. Other astronomers14 have seen in these inexplicable15 rays a kind of moraines, rows of erratic16 blocks, which had been thrown up at the period of Tycho’s formation.
“And why not?” asked Nicholl of Barbicane, who was relating and rejecting these different opinions.
“Because the regularity17 of these luminous lines, and the violence necessary to carry volcanic18 matter to such distances, is inexplicable.”
“Eh! by Jove!” replied Michel Ardan, “it seems easy enough to me to explain the origin of these rays.”
“Indeed?” said Barbicane.
“Indeed,” continued Michel. “It is enough to say that it is a vast star, similar to that produced by a ball or a stone thrown at a square of glass!”
“Well!” replied Barbicane, smiling. “And what hand would be powerful enough to throw a ball to give such a shock as that?”
“The hand is not necessary,” answered Nicholl, not at all confounded; “and as to the stone, let us suppose it to be a comet.”
“Ah! those much-abused comets!” exclaimed Barbicane. “My brave Michel, your explanation is not bad; but your comet is useless. The shock which produced that rent must have some from the inside of the star. A violent contraction19 of the lunar crust, while cooling, might suffice to imprint20 this gigantic star.”
“A contraction! something like a lunar stomach-ache.” said Michel Ardan.
“Besides,” added Barbicane, “this opinion is that of an English savant, Nasmyth, and it seems to me to sufficiently21 explain the radiation of these mountains.”
“That Nasmyth was no fool!” replied Michel.
Long did the travelers, whom such a sight could never weary, admire the splendors22 of Tycho. Their projectile, saturated23 with luminous gleams in the double irradiation of sun and moon, must have appeared like an incandescent24 globe. They had passed suddenly from excessive cold to intense heat. Nature was thus preparing them to become Selenites. Become Selenites! That idea brought up once more the question of the habitability of the moon. After what they had seen, could the travelers solve it? Would they decide for or against it? Michel Ardan persuaded his two friends to form an opinion, and asked them directly if they thought that men and animals were represented in the lunar world.
“I think that we can answer,” said Barbicane; “but according to my idea the question ought not to be put in that form. I ask it to be put differently.”
“Put it your own way,” replied Michel.
“Here it is,” continued Barbicane. “The problem is a double one, and requires a double solution. Is the moon habitable? Has the moon ever been inhabitable?”
“Good!” replied Nicholl. “First let us see whether the moon is habitable.”
“To tell the truth, I know nothing about it,” answered Michel.
“And I answer in the negative,” continued Barbicane. “In her actual state, with her surrounding atmosphere certainly very much reduced, her seas for the most part dried up, her insufficient25 supply of water restricted, vegetation, sudden alternations of cold and heat, her days and nights of 354 hours — the moon does not seem habitable to me, nor does she seem propitious26 to animal development, nor sufficient for the wants of existence as we understand it.”
“Agreed,” replied Nicholl. “But is not the moon habitable for creatures differently organized from ourselves?”
“That question is more difficult to answer, but I will try; and I ask Nicholl if motion appears to him to be a necessary result of life, whatever be its organization?”
“Without a doubt!” answered Nicholl.
“Then, my worthy27 companion, I would answer that we have observed the lunar continent at a distance of 500 yards at most, and that nothing seemed to us to move on the moon’s surface. The presence of any kind of life would have been betrayed by its attendant marks, such as divers28 buildings, and even by ruins. And what have we seen? Everywhere and always the geological works of nature, never the work of man. If, then, there exist representatives of the animal kingdom on the moon, they must have fled to those unfathomable cavities which the eye cannot reach; which I cannot admit, for they must have left traces of their passage on those plains which the atmosphere must cover, however slightly raised it may be. These traces are nowhere visible. There remains29 but one hypothesis, that of a living race to which motion, which is life, is foreign.”
“One might as well say, living creatures which do not live,” replied Michel.
“Just so,” said Barbicane, “which for us has no meaning.”
“Then we may form our opinion?” said Michel.
“Yes,” replied Nicholl.
“Very well,” continued Michel Ardan, “the Scientific Commission assembled in the projectile of the Gun Club, after having founded their argument on facts recently observed, decide unanimously upon the question of the habitability of the moon — ‘No! the moon is not habitable.’”
This decision was consigned30 by President Barbicane to his notebook, where the process of the sitting of the 6th of December may be seen.
“Now,” said Nicholl, “let us attack the second question, an indispensable complement31 of the first. I ask the honorable commission, if the moon is not habitable, has she ever been inhabited, Citizen Barbicane?”
“My friends,” replied Barbicane, “I did not undertake this journey in order to form an opinion on the past habitability of our satellite; but I will add that our personal observations only confirm me in this opinion. I believe, indeed I affirm, that the moon has been inhabited by a human race organized like our own; that she has produced animals anatomically formed like the terrestrial animals: but I add that these races, human and animal, have had their day, and are now forever extinct!”
“Then,” asked Michel, “the moon must be older than the earth?”
“No!” said Barbicane decidedly, “but a world which has grown old quicker, and whose formation and deformation32 have been more rapid. Relatively33, the organizing force of matter has been much more violent in the interior of the moon than in the interior of the terrestrial globe. The actual state of this cracked, twisted, and burst disc abundantly proves this. The moon and the earth were nothing but gaseous34 masses originally. These gases have passed into a liquid state under different influences, and the solid masses have been formed later. But most certainly our sphere was still gaseous or liquid, when the moon was solidified35 by cooling, and had become habitable.”
“I believe it,” said Nicholl.
“Then,” continued Barbicane, “an atmosphere surrounded it, the waters contained within this gaseous envelope could not evaporate. Under the influence of air, water, light, solar heat, and central heat, vegetation took possession of the continents prepared to receive it, and certainly life showed itself about this period, for nature does not expend37 herself in vain; and a world so wonderfully formed for habitation must necessarily be inhabited.”
“But,” said Nicholl, “many phenomena38 inherent in our satellite might cramp39 the expansion of the animal and vegetable kingdom. For example, its days and nights of 354 hours?”
“At the terrestrial poles they last six months,” said Michel.
“An argument of little value, since the poles are not inhabited.”
“Let us observe, my friends,” continued Barbicane, “that if in the actual state of the moon its long nights and long days created differences of temperature insupportable to organization, it was not so at the historical period of time. The atmosphere enveloped40 the disc with a fluid mantle41; vapor36 deposited itself in the shape of clouds; this natural screen tempered the ardor42 of the solar rays, and retained the nocturnal radiation. Light, like heat, can diffuse43 itself in the air; hence an equality between the influences which no longer exists, now that atmosphere has almost entirely44 disappeared. And now I am going to astonish you.”
“Astonish us?” said Michel Ardan.
“I firmly believe that at the period when the moon was inhabited, the nights and days did not last 354 hours!”
“And why?” asked Nicholl quickly.
“Because most probably then the rotary45 motion of the moon upon her axis46 was not equal to her revolution, an equality which presents each part of her disc during fifteen days to the action of the solar rays.”
“Granted,” replied Nicholl, “but why should not these two motions have been equal, as they are really so?”
“Because that equality has only been determined47 by terrestrial attraction. And who can say that this attraction was powerful enough to alter the motion of the moon at that period when the earth was still fluid?”
“Just so,” replied Nicholl; “and who can say that the moon has always been a satellite of the earth?”
“And who can say,” exclaimed Michel Ardan, “that the moon did not exist before the earth?”
Their imaginations carried them away into an indefinite field of hypothesis. Barbicane sought to restrain them.
“Those speculations48 are too high,” said he; “problems utterly49 insoluble. Do not let us enter upon them. Let us only admit the insufficiency of the primordial50 attraction; and then by the inequality of the two motions of rotation51 and revolution, the days and nights could have succeeded each other on the moon as they succeed each other on the earth. Besides, even without these conditions, life was possible.”
“And so,” asked Michel Ardan, “humanity has disappeared from the moon?”
“Yes,” replied Barbicane, “after having doubtless remained persistently52 for millions of centuries; by degrees the atmosphere becoming rarefied, the disc became uninhabitable, as the terrestrial globe will one day become by cooling.”
“By cooling?”
“Certainly,” replied Barbicane; “as the internal fires became extinguished, and the incandescent matter concentrated itself, the lunar crust cooled. By degrees the consequences of these phenomena showed themselves in the disappearance53 of organized beings, and by the disappearance of vegetation. Soon the atmosphere was rarefied, probably withdrawn54 by terrestrial attraction; then aerial departure of respirable air, and disappearance of water by means of evaporation55. At this period the moon becoming uninhabitable, was no longer inhabited. It was a dead world, such as we see it to-day.”
“And you say that the same fate is in store for the earth?”
“Most probably.”
“But when?”
“When the cooling of its crust shall have made it uninhabitable.”
“And have they calculated the time which our unfortunate sphere will take to cool?”
“Certainly.”
“And you know these calculations?”
“Perfectly.”
“But speak, then, my clumsy savant,” exclaimed Michel Ardan, “for you make me boil with impatience56!”
“Very well, my good Michel,” replied Barbicane quietly; “we know what diminution57 of temperature the earth undergoes in the lapse58 of a century. And according to certain calculations, this mean temperature will after a period of 400,000 years, be brought down to zero!”
“Four hundred thousand years!” exclaimed Michel. “Ah! I breathe again. Really I was frightened to hear you; I imagined that we had not more than 50,000 years to live.”
Barbicane and Nicholl could not help laughing at their companion’s uneasiness. Then Nicholl, who wished to end the discussion, put the second question, which had just been considered again.
“Has the moon been inhabited?” he asked.
The answer was unanimously in the affirmative. But during this discussion, fruitful in somewhat hazardous59 theories, the projectile was rapidly leaving the moon: the lineaments faded away from the travelers’ eyes, mountains were confused in the distance; and of all the wonderful, strange, and fantastical form of the earth’s satellite, there soon remained nothing but the imperishable remembrance.
点击收听单词发音
1 projectile | |
n.投射物,发射体;adj.向前开进的;推进的;抛掷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 scrupulous | |
adj.审慎的,小心翼翼的,完全的,纯粹的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ardent | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 furrows | |
n.犁沟( furrow的名词复数 );(脸上的)皱纹v.犁田,开沟( furrow的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 meridian | |
adj.子午线的;全盛期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 furrowed | |
v.犁田,开沟( furrow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 crater | |
n.火山口,弹坑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lava | |
n.熔岩,火山岩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 congealed | |
v.使凝结,冻结( congeal的过去式和过去分词 );(指血)凝结 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 astronomers | |
n.天文学者,天文学家( astronomer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 inexplicable | |
adj.无法解释的,难理解的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 erratic | |
adj.古怪的,反复无常的,不稳定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 volcanic | |
adj.火山的;象火山的;由火山引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 contraction | |
n.缩略词,缩写式,害病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 imprint | |
n.印痕,痕迹;深刻的印象;vt.压印,牢记 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 splendors | |
n.华丽( splendor的名词复数 );壮丽;光辉;显赫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 saturated | |
a.饱和的,充满的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 incandescent | |
adj.遇热发光的, 白炽的,感情强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 insufficient | |
adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 propitious | |
adj.吉利的;顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 divers | |
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 consigned | |
v.把…置于(令人不快的境地)( consign的过去式和过去分词 );把…托付给;把…托人代售;丟弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 complement | |
n.补足物,船上的定员;补语;vt.补充,补足 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 deformation | |
n.形状损坏;变形;畸形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 gaseous | |
adj.气体的,气态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 solidified | |
(使)成为固体,(使)变硬,(使)变得坚固( solidify的过去式和过去分词 ); 使团结一致; 充实,巩固; 具体化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 vapor | |
n.蒸汽,雾气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 expend | |
vt.花费,消费,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 cramp | |
n.痉挛;[pl.](腹)绞痛;vt.限制,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 enveloped | |
v.包围,笼罩,包住( envelop的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 mantle | |
n.斗篷,覆罩之物,罩子;v.罩住,覆盖,脸红 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 ardor | |
n.热情,狂热 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 diffuse | |
v.扩散;传播;adj.冗长的;四散的,弥漫的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 rotary | |
adj.(运动等)旋转的;轮转的;转动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 axis | |
n.轴,轴线,中心线;坐标轴,基准线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 speculations | |
n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 );思考;投机活动;推断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 primordial | |
adj.原始的;最初的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 rotation | |
n.旋转;循环,轮流 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 persistently | |
ad.坚持地;固执地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 disappearance | |
n.消失,消散,失踪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 evaporation | |
n.蒸发,消失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 impatience | |
n.不耐烦,急躁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 diminution | |
n.减少;变小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 lapse | |
n.过失,流逝,失效,抛弃信仰,间隔;vi.堕落,停止,失效,流逝;vt.使失效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 hazardous | |
adj.(有)危险的,冒险的;碰运气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |