"Time to do more digging," he tells the Librarian. "But this is going to have to be totally verbal, because I'm headed up I-5 at some incredible speed right now, and I have to watch out for slow-moving bagos and stuff."
"I'll keep that in mind," the voice of the Librarian says into his earphones. "Look out for the jackknifed truck south of Santa Clarita. And there is a large chuckhole in the left lane near the Tulare exit."
"Thanks. Who were these gods anyway? Did Lagos have an opinion on that?"
"Lagos believed that they might have been magicians -- that is, normal human beings with special powers -- or they might have been aliens."
"Whoa, whoa, hold on. Let's take these one at a time. What did Lagos mean when he talked about 'normal human beings with special powers'?"
"Assume that the nam-shub of Enki really functioned as a virus. Assume that someone named Enki invented it. Then Enki must have had some kind of linguistic1 power that goes beyond our concept of normal."
"And how would this power work? What's the mechanism2?"
"I can only give you forward references drawn3 by Lagos."
"Okay. Give me some."
"The belief in the magical power of language is not unusual, both in mystical and academic literature. The Kabbalists -- Jewish mystics of Spain and Palestine -- believed that super-normal insight and power could be derived4 from properly combining the letters of the Divine Name. For example, Abu Aharon, an early Kabbalist who emigrated from Baghdad to Italy, was said to perform miracles through the power of the Sacred Names."
"What kind of power are we talking about here?"
"Most Kabbalists were theorists who were interested only in pure meditation5. But there were so-called 'practical Kabbalists' who tried to apply the power of the Kabbalah in everyday life."
"In other words, sorcerers."
"Yes. These practical Kabbalists used a so-called 'archangelic alphabet,' derived from first-century Greek and Aramaic theurgic alphabets, which resembled cuneiform. The Kabbalists referred to this alphabet as 'eye writing,' because the letters were composed of lines and small circles, which resembled eyes."
"Ones and zeroes."
"Some Kabbalists divided up the letters of the alphabet according to where they were produced inside the mouth."
"Okay. So as we would think of it, they were drawing a connection between the printed letter on the page and the neural6 connections that had to be invoked7 in order to pronounce it."
"Yes. By analyzing8 the spelling of various words, they were able to draw what they thought were profound conclusions about their true, inner meaning and significance."
"Okay. If you say so."
"In the academic realm, the literature is naturally not as fanciful. But a great deal of effort has been devoted9 to explaining Babel. Not the Babel event -- which most people consider to be a myth -- but the fact that languages tend to diverge10. A number of linguistic theories have been developed in an effort to tie all languages together."
"Theories Lagos tried to apply to his virus hypothesis."
"Yes. There are two schools: relativists and universalists. As George Steiner summarizes it, relativists tend to believe that language is not the vehicle of thought but its determining medium. It is the framework of cognition. Our perceptions of everything are organized by the flux11 of sensations passing over that framework. Hence, the study of the evolution of language is the study of the evolution of the human mind itself."
"Okay, I can see the significance of that. What about the universalists?"
"In contrast with the relativists, who believe that languages need not have anything in common with each other, the universalists believe that if you can analyze12 languages enough, you can find that all of them have certain traits in common. So they analyze languages, looking for such traits."
"Have they found any?"
"No. There seems to be an exception to every rule."
"Which blows universalism out of the water."
"Not necessarily. They explain this problem by saying that the shared traits are too deeply buried to be analyzable."
"Which is a cop out."
"Their point is that at some level, language has to happen inside the human brain. Since all human brains are more or less the same -- "
"The hardware's the same. Not the software."
"You are using some kind of metaphor13 that I cannot understand."
Hiro whips past a big Airstream that is rocking from side to side in a dangerous wind coming down the valley.
"Well, a French-speaker's brain starts out the same as an English-speaker's brain. As they grow up, they get programmed with different software -- they learn different languages."
"Yes. Therefore, according to the universalists, French and English -- or any other languages -- must share certain traits that have their roots in the 'deep structures' of the human brain. According to Chomskyan theory, the deep structures are innate14 components15 of the brain that enable it to carry out certain formal kinds of operations on strings16 of symbols. Or, as Steiner paraphrases17 Emmon Bach: These deep structures eventually lead to the actual patterning of the cortex with its immensely ramified yet, at the same time, 'programmed' network of electrochemical and neurophysiological channels."
"But these deep structures are so deep we can't even see them?"
"The universalists place the active nodes of linguistic life -- the deep structures -- so deep as to defy observation and description. Or to use Steiner's analogy: Try to draw up the creature from the depths of the sea, and it will disintegrate18 or change form grotesquely19."
"There's that serpent again. So which theory did Lagos believe in? The relativist or the universalist?"
"He did not seem to think there was much of a difference. In the end, they are both somewhat mystical. Lagos believed that both schools of thought had essentially20 arrived at the same place by different lines of reasoning."
"But it seems to me there is a key difference," Hiro says. "The universalists think that we are determined21 by the prepatterned structure of our brains -- the pathways in the cortex. The relativists don't believe that we have any limits."
"Lagos modified the strict Chomskyan theory by supposing that learning a language is like blowing code into PROMs -- an analogy that I cannot interpret."
"The analogy is clear. PROMs are Programmable Read-Only Memory chips," Hiro says. "When they come from the factory, they have no content. Once and only once, you can place information into those chips and then freeze it -- the information, the software, becomes frozen into the chip -- it transmutes22 into hardware. After you have blown the code into the PROMs, you can read it out, but you can't write to them anymore. So Lagos was trying to say that the newborn human brain has no structure -- as the relativists would have it -- and that as the child learns a language, the developing brain structures itself accordingly, the language gets 'blown into the hardware and becomes a permanent part of the brain's deep structure -- as the universalists would have it."
"Yes. This was his interpretation23."
"Okay. So when he talked about Enki being a real person with magical powers, what he meant was that Enki somehow understood the connection between language and the brain, knew how to manipulate it. The same way that a hacker24, knowing the secrets of a computer system, can write code to control it -- digital nam-shubs?"
"Lagos said that Enki had the ability to ascend25 into the universe of language and see it before his eyes. Much as humans go into the Metaverse. That gave him power to create nam-shubs. And nam-shubs had the power to alter the functioning of the brain and of the body."
"Why isn't anyone doing this kind of thing nowadays? Why aren't there any nam-shubs in English?"
"Not all languages are the same, as Steiner points out. Some languages are better at metaphor than others. Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Chinese lend themselves to word play and have achieved a lasting26 grip on reality: Palestine had Qiryat Sefer, the 'City of the Letter,' and Syria had Byblos, the 'Town of the Book.' By contrast other civilizations seem 'speechless' or at least, as may have been the case in Egypt, not entirely27 cognizant of the creative and transformational powers of language. Lagos believed that Sumerian was an extraordinarily28 powerful language -- at least it was in Sumer five thousand years ago."
"A language that lent itself to Enki's neurolinguistic hacking29."
"Early linguists30, as well as the Kabbalists, believed in a fictional31 language called the tongue of Eden, the language of Adam. It enabled all men to understand each other, to communicate without misunderstanding. It was the language of the Logos, the moment when God created the world by speaking a word. In the tongue of Eden, naming a thing was the same as creating it. To quote Steiner again, 'Our speech interposes itself between apprehension32 and truth like a dusty pane33 or warped34 mirror. The tongue of Eden was like a flawless glass; a light of total understanding streamed through it. Thus Babel was a second Fall.' And Isaac the Blind, an early Kabbalist, said that, to quote Gershom Scholem's translation, 'The speech of men is connected with divine speech and all language whether heavenly or human derives35 from one source: the Divine Name.' The practical Kabbalists, the sorcerers, bore the title Ba'al Shem, meaning 'master of the divine name.'"
"The machine language of the world," Hiro says.
"Is this another analogy?"
"Computers speak machine language," Hiro says. "It's written in ones and zeroes -- binary36 code. At the lowest level, all computers are programmed with strings of ones and zeroes. When you program in machine language, you are controlling the computer at its brainstem, the root of its existence. It's the tongue of Eden. But it's very difficult to work in machine language because you go crazy after a while, working at such a minute level. So a whole Babel of computer languages has been created for programmers: FORTRAN, BASIC, COBOL, LISP, Pascal, C, PROLOG, FORTH37. You talk to the computer in one of these languages, and a piece of software called a compiler converts it into machine language. But you never can tell exactly what the compiler is doing. It doesn't always come out the way you want. Like a dusty pane or warped mirror. A really advanced hacker comes to understand the true inner workings of the machine -- he sees through the language he's working in and glimpses the secret functioning of the binary code -- becomes a Ba'al Shem of sorts."
"Lagos believed that the legends about the tongue of Eden were exaggerated versions of true events," the Librarian says. "These legends reflected nostalgia38 for a time when people spoke39 Sumerian, a tongue that was superior to anything that came afterward40."
"Is Sumerian really that good?"
"Not as far as modern-day linguists can tell," the Librarian says. "As I mentioned, it is largely impossible for us to grasp. Lagos suspected that words worked differently in those days. If one's native tongue influences the physical structure of the developing brain, then it is fair to say that the Sumerians -- who spoke a language radically41 different from anything in existence today -- had fundamentally different brains from yours. Lagos believed that for this reason, Sumerian was a language ideally suited to the creation and propagation of viruses. That a virus, once released into Sumer, would spread rapidly and virulently42, until it had infected everyone."
"Maybe Enki knew that also," Hiro says. "Maybe the nam-shub of Enki wasn't such a bad thing. Maybe Babel was the best thing that ever happened to us."
1 linguistic | |
adj.语言的,语言学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 meditation | |
n.熟虑,(尤指宗教的)默想,沉思,(pl.)冥想录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 neural | |
adj.神经的,神经系统的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 invoked | |
v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 analyzing | |
v.分析;分析( analyze的现在分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析n.分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 diverge | |
v.分叉,分歧,离题,使...岔开,使转向 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 flux | |
n.流动;不断的改变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 analyze | |
vt.分析,解析 (=analyse) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 metaphor | |
n.隐喻,暗喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 innate | |
adj.天生的,固有的,天赋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 components | |
(机器、设备等的)构成要素,零件,成分; 成分( component的名词复数 ); [物理化学]组分; [数学]分量; (混合物的)组成部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 strings | |
n.弦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 paraphrases | |
n.释义,意译( paraphrase的名词复数 )v.释义,意译( paraphrase的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 disintegrate | |
v.瓦解,解体,(使)碎裂,(使)粉碎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 grotesquely | |
adv. 奇异地,荒诞地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 transmutes | |
v.使变形,使变质,把…变成…( transmute的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 hacker | |
n.能盗用或偷改电脑中信息的人,电脑黑客 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 ascend | |
vi.渐渐上升,升高;vt.攀登,登上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 lasting | |
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 extraordinarily | |
adv.格外地;极端地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 hacking | |
n.非法访问计算机系统和数据库的活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 linguists | |
n.通晓数国语言的人( linguist的名词复数 );语言学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 fictional | |
adj.小说的,虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 pane | |
n.窗格玻璃,长方块 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 warped | |
adj.反常的;乖戾的;(变)弯曲的;变形的v.弄弯,变歪( warp的过去式和过去分词 );使(行为等)不合情理,使乖戾, | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 derives | |
v.得到( derive的第三人称单数 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 binary | |
adj.二,双;二进制的;n.双(体);联星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 nostalgia | |
n.怀乡病,留恋过去,怀旧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 afterward | |
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 radically | |
ad.根本地,本质地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 virulently | |
恶毒地,狠毒地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |