The Birmingham riots of 1791.
The picture which Priestley drew of his life in Birmingham at this period, as given in the autobiographical sketch2 published after his death, is almost dramatic in its pathos3 when we bear in mind that it was written almost on the eve of that maniacal4 outburst of popular passion which eventually drove him from our shores. He said he considered his settlement at Birmingham as the happiest event in his life, as being highly favourable5 to every object he had in view, philosophical7 or theological. He thanks God that his prospects8 are better than they have ever been before, that his own health, and that of his dear wife, is better established, and his hopes as to the disposition9 and future settlement of his children are satisfactory. He has particular reason to be grateful for the happy temperament10 of body and mind he owes to his parents, and for the fundamentally good constitution of body to which was due an even cheerfulness of temper which had but few interruptions. Another great subject of thankfulness to a good Providence11 was his perfect freedom from any embarrassment12 in his circumstances, for his supplies had been always equal to his wants, and his indifference13 to an increase of fortune was the means of attaining14 it.
THE PILLAGING15 OF PRIESTLEY’S HOUSE DURING THE BIRMINGHAM RIOTS
121
“When,” he says, “I began my experiments I expended16 on them all the money I could possibly raise, carried on by my ardour in philosophical investigations17, and entirely18 regardless of consequences, except so far as never to contract any debt.... But having succeeded, I was in time more than indemnified for all that I had expended.
“Yet frequently, as I have changed my situation, and always for the better, I can truly say that I never wished for any change on my own account. I should have been contented19 even at Needham if I could have been unmolested and had bare necessaries. This freedom from anxiety was remarkable20 in my father, and therefore is in a manner hereditary21 to me; but it has been much increased by reflection, having frequently observed, especially with respect to Christian22 ministers, how often it has contributed to embitter23 their lives without being of any use to them. Some attention to the improvement of a man’s circumstances is no doubt right, because no man can tell what occasion he may have for money, especially if he have children, and therefore I do not recommend my example to others. But I am thankful to that good Providence which always took more care of me than ever I took of myself.”
This serene24 contentment is reflected in his correspondence at this period, and we find further evidence of it in the letters of his friends.
“I esteem25 it a singular happiness to have lived in an age and country in which I have been at full liberty both to investigate, and by preaching and writing to propagate, religious truth; that though the freedom I have used for this purpose was for some time disadvantageous to me, it was not long so, and that my present situation is such that I can, with the greatest openness, urge whatever appears to me the truth of the Gospel, not only without giving the least offence, but with the entire approbation26 of those with whom I am particularly connected.”
Dr Aikin, visiting him in 1784, says in a letter to Mrs Aikin:—
“The great philosopher, with his simple, bland27, unaffected manners, contented and happy, and declaring that he had not a wish on earth unsatisfied, gave me infinite delight.”
These halcyon29 days were, however, but as the calm before the storm, and the contented and happy 122 philosopher had soon need of all his philosophy, and of all his Christianity too, in face of the ungoverned fury of the mob which, to use Wedgwood’s words, swept like a hurricane over him and his friends.
The 14th of July 1791—the anniversary of the French Revolution—was celebrated30 in several towns in England without interruption or any untoward31 circumstance; that day, however, was long remembered by the inhabitants of Birmingham with feelings akin32 to horror. It is certain that the popular rising which then took place in that town was in the outset mainly directed against Priestley. The course of events proves this. As it happened, the appetite in the mob for mischief33 grew by what it fed upon, and many others, his friends and political and religious associates, were involved in the disaster which overtook him. For it would appear that those who, in the first instance, instigated34 and directed the outrage35 lost all control over the forces which they invoked36, and the rising, which in the beginning was intended to visit Priestley with the vengeance37 which the Cracow mob inflicted38 on his prototype Socinus, developed into a wild anarchical riot, confused and purposeless except as gratifying a wanton lust39 for rapine and destruction. Many contemporary accounts exist of the Birmingham riots of 1791, and although, as might be expected from the temper of the times, some of the narratives41 are not wholly uncoloured by prejudice and the partisan42 spirit of political and religious feeling, it is not difficult to put together a true view of an episode which profoundly affected28 all parties and sent a thrill of apprehension43 and alarm throughout the country. Political feeling at the period ran high. Europe had recently witnessed the spectacle of a 123 revolution which had filled the governing classes of every state with awe44 and even terror, and the great masses of the people in this and other countries, to whom all political power was denied, were beginning to realise what might be possible to concerted action properly organised and vigorously pressed. Every bureaucracy was in a state of trepidation46. The political atmosphere was heavily charged with electricity and no one could foretell47 where and when the next thunderbolt would descend48. Naturally enough the great vested interests in Church and State looked askance at, and were disquieted49 by, these periodical celebrations of such an event as the destruction of the Bastile and all that it symbolised, with their odes to Liberty, Fraternity and Equality, and their impassioned appeals to Demos, and the rising hopes of a people grown restive50 and impatient under what they were taught to believe was political thraldom51. It required but a small spark to bring about a conflagration52, and designing and unscrupulous men saw in the approaching anniversary of the memorable53 14th of July an opportunity of which they were determined54 to take advantage. Priestley had himself, unwittingly, laid the train which brought about the catastrophe55.
“Dr Priestley,” says Corry, writing in 1804, “from the commencement of his residence at Birmingham, had undoubtedly56 turned his attention too much from the luminous57 field of philosophic6 disquisition to the sterile58 regions of polemic59 divinity and the still more thorny60 paths of polemic politics. His tracts61 on these subjects amounted to upwards62 of thirty, and from his celebrity63 they had a very general circulation. As a philosopher he clearly saw defects in the most perfect of human institutions, and expressed himself with a boldness and freedom which alarmed the neighbouring clergy64 of the 124 Established Church, and excited their resentment65. The labouring classes in Birmingham certainly looked upon him as a disaffected66 and dangerous man. Incapable67 of deep reflection themselves, they abhorred68 his Unitarian principles as subversive69 of Christianity, and the idea that the Church was in danger was propagated among them by men of deeper discernment, who wished to render Dr Priestley odious70 and unpopular. A very considerable number, however, of the more enlightened inhabitants, who were convinced of the Doctor’s integrity as a man, sincerity71 as a preacher, and superlative merit as a philosopher, were his strenuous72 advocates and admirers. The collision of parties became every day more violent, and the events which were daily transacting73 in France kept alive the jealousy75 arising from uncongenial opinions.”
A contemporary account states: The vigorous and repeated attempts of the Dissenters78 to obtain a repeal79 of the Corporation and Test Laws [repealed in 1828], excited much alarm and apprehension amongst many of the Established clergy, and were most forcibly felt by those residing in Birmingham. The name and writings of Dr Priestley were as much dreaded80 by his opponents as they were admired by his friends; and as he long resided near this town, and was eminently81 conspicuous82 in his endeavours to procure83 a repeal of these laws, and in the promulgation84 of Unitarian doctrines85, it is not surprising that his sentiments should have been represented to the lower classes of the people as dangerous to the Church and State.
Attacks made upon his principles and motives86 in different pulpits were answered from the Press, and produced among other things his Familiar Letters Addressed to the Inhabitants of Birmingham, in which his opponents are combated with much force and severity. In the course of his controversial publications Priestley had made a comparison of the progress of free inquiry87 125 to the action of gunpowder88. The conclusion of the passage ran thus:—
“The present silent propagation of truth may even be compared to those causes in Nature which lie dormant89 for a time, but which in proper circumstances act with the greatest violence. We are, as it were, laying gunpowder, grain by grain, under the old building of error and superstition90, which a single spark may hereafter inflame91, so as to produce an instantaneous explosion; in consequence of which that edifice92, the erection of which has been the work of ages, may be overturned in a moment, and so effectually as that the same foundation can never be built upon again.”
This paragraph became to the enemies of the Dissenters a common topic of allusion93, and was read in the House of Commons as an unquestionable proof of the dangerous designs of that body with respect to the constitution of this country. Hence the mischievous94 thinkers found no difficulty in persuading the unthinking actors that the real intentions of the Dissenters were to destroy the churches.
That mischief was being deliberately95 planned in view of the coming anniversary was certainly known to not a few of those in authority, some of whom from their position were responsible for the order and good government of the town. Some days before the outbreak a number of copies of a seditious hand-bill had been left in a public-house by an unknown person, and this had been copied and circulated throughout the town, causing a general ferment96 in the minds of the lowest class of the people. Its character was such that the magistrates97 promptly99 offered a reward of one hundred guineas for the discovery of the Writer, Printer, Publisher or Distributer of the inflammatory hand-bill. But notwithstanding that the Dissenters themselves 126 afterwards offered an additional reward of one hundred guineas, and the Government also proclaimed a further reward of one hundred pounds, no clue was ever obtained to the persons concerned in its preparation or distribution. Such, however, was the feeling of apprehension in the minds of those who were about to take part in the proposed celebration that it was determined to publish the following advertisement in the Birmingham Chronicle:—
Birmingham Commemoration of the French Revolution.
“Several hand-bills having been circulated in the town which can only be intended to create distrust concerning the intention of the meeting, to disturb its harmony and inflame the minds of people, the Gentlemen who proposed it think it necessary to declare their entire disapprobation of all such hand-bills and their ignorance of the authors. Sensible themselves of the advantages of a Free Government, they rejoice in the extension of Liberty to their Neighbours, at the same time avowing100, in the most explicit101 manner, their firm attachment102 to the Constitution of their own Country, as vested in the Three Estates of the King, Lords and Commons. Surely no Free-born Englishman can refrain from exulting103 in this addition to the general mass of human happiness. It is the cause of Humanity, it is the cause of the People.
“Birmingham, July 13, 1791.”
We learn from a letter in the same newspaper, written a few days later by Mr William Russell, Priestley’s friend, and himself, with his family, a sufferer in the events which followed, that in spite of this disclaimer there was still good grounds for believing that evil was brewing104. He says that on the morning of the 14th many rumours105 of the probability of a riot were brought to the friends of the meeting; and as there was too much reason to think that means had been used to promote 127 one, they determined to postpone106 the intended dinner and prepared a notice to that effect.
“This,” says Mr Russell, “was sent to the printer, but before he had composed it, Mr Dadley, the master of the hotel, attended, in consequence of having the Dinner countermanded107, and represented that he was sure there was no danger of any tumult108, and recommended that the Dinner might be held as was intended; only proposing that the gentlemen should take care to break up early, and then all danger would be avoided. This measure was then adopted, and orders given to the printer to suppress the hand-bill. Accordingly there was a meeting of eighty-one gentlemen, inhabitants of the town and neighbourhood, at the great room in the hotel, where they dined and passed the afternoon with that social, temperate109 and benevolent110 festivity which the consideration of the great event that has diffused111 liberty and happiness among a large portion of the human race inspired.”
Mr Russell continues:—
“It is but justice to the liberality and public spirit of an inglorious artist of this town to mention that he decorated the room upon this occasion with three elegant emblematic112 pieces of sculpture, mixed with painting, in a new style of composition. The central piece was a finely executed medallion of His Majesty113, encircled with a Glory, on each side of which was an alabaster114 Obelisk115; one exhibiting Gallic Liberty breaking the bands of Despotism, and the other representing British Liberty in its present enjoyment116.
“A truly respectable gentleman [Captain Keir], a member of the Church of England, was chairman; others of that profession were of the company, nor was a single sentiment uttered, or, I believe, conceived, that would hurt the feelings of any one friend to liberty and good government under the happy constitution we are blessed with in this kingdom.”
The mob, if they thought at all, thought otherwise. Although, we are told, the utmost harmony prevailed at the festive117 board, and the company dispersed119 without the least disturbance120, they found a considerable number 128 of the populace assembled in the neighbourhood of Temple Row, evidently bent121 on mischief. The crowd remained in the vicinity of the hotel, their numbers gradually increasing, for a couple of hours after Captain Keir and his friends had left. Whether the people expected Priestley to be of the company, and fancied he was being detained in the hotel on account of their threatening attitude, is uncertain. As a matter of fact he had not been at the dinner. Suddenly the cry of “Church and King!” was raised, and at that signal every window in the front of the hotel was promptly broken. Thereupon, as if by a common impulse, or if as acting74 under direction, the crowd swept onwards to the New Meeting, where Priestley preached; this they assailed122, we are told, with incredible fury. The New Meeting was erected123 in 1730: it was described as a considerable pile, “more remarkable for plainness and simplicity124 than for any uncommon125 elegance126 of workmanship or superb style of decoration. The vestry contained a valuable collection of books for the use of the Society which assembled there.” The gates and doors were soon burst open, the pews demolished127, the cushions and fragments carried out and burnt in front of the building, and at length fire was carried in which consumed it to the outer walls. The mob was now roused to frenzy128. Some of the magistrates strove to quell129 the riot, and even those who had connived130 at the outrage grew alarmed at the dangerous temper which they had roused. But the infuriated rabble131 by this time was thoroughly132 out of control, and no sufficient force was at hand to cope with it. The Old Meeting-House was next demolished with the regularity133 of workmen employed for the purpose. A party armed with crow-bars, 129 bludgeons, etc., tore down the pulpit, pews and galleries, and burnt them in the burying-ground, afterwards setting fire to the body of the Meeting-house. The cry of “Church and King!” was again raised, and the rioters marched in a body to Fair Hill, about a mile from the town, where Priestley resided. His house was described by Aikin as “a most comfortable and pleasing retreat.” “Although,” we are told, “it belonged to a gentleman who was deservedly a favourite of the poor, yet because it was the dwelling134 of Dr Priestley it was doomed135 to destruction,” and was “attacked with the most savage136 and determined fury.” Priestley, when the news was brought to him by his friend, Samuel Ryland, of the destruction of the Meeting-Houses and of the impending137 attack on Fair Hill, was playing backgammon with his wife, as was his custom after supper. He could hardly be persuaded of the danger in which he stood, and it was with difficulty that Ryland hurried him and Mrs Priestley into the chaise which was waiting at the door. He and his wife were then quickly driven to Showell Green, the residence of his friend, William Russell, leaving his son William Priestley, and some other young persons, with the servants to protect the property. What followed may best be gleaned138 from the graphic1 narrative40 of Miss Martha Russell, written within a few days of the occurrence, but first published in The Christian Reformer of 1835, Vol. II. p. 293:—
“As we were at supper, Tolley, our footman, came in with a countenance139 as pale as ashes, and told my father a messenger was just arrived to inform him that a mob had collected and set fire to the New Meeting-House, and were then employed in destroying the Old Meeting-House also, and they declared their intention to come from thence to Dr Priestley’s house 130 and then to ours, and that no magistrate98 appeared or could be found to disperse118 them. Consternation140 and alarm now filled our minds. My father ordered his horse, intending to go and meet the mob, and search out the justices to quell it. Whilst he was loading his pocket-pistols to carry with him, a chaise drove up to the door with Dr and Mrs Priestley and Mr Samuel Ryland. The latter had taken the alarm, and, procuring141 a chaise, had hurried the Doctor and Mrs P. away from their house, fearing the mob would be there immediately. So great was the panic he had felt and inspired them with that they had secured nothing, but seemed as if happy and fortunate in escaping with their lives. We all united in begging my father not to leave the house, and urged the danger he would be in by meeting such an ungovernable concourse of people, and that, being alone, he could do nothing towards quelling142 them, and no doubt but our friends in Birmingham would some of them exert themselves and stir up the magistrates without his running such a risk. He would, however, hear nothing of it, but declared ‘he would be his own master that night.’ Seeing him resolved to go, Mrs Priestley requested him to bring her a small box of money she had in her chamber143, and Dr P. wished for his pocket-book, which contained something of value, and which he had left on the table in the parlour, so great was their hurry and alarm.... We walked up and down the foot-road leading to town in a dreadful state of suspense144 and apprehension, clearly discerning the fire from the two Meeting-Houses, and distinctly hearing the shouts of the mob....
“In about three hours my father returned and informed us he went first to Dr Priestley’s house, where he found William Priestley, whom he instructed to begin and move all the Doctor’s manuscripts he thought most likely to be valuable, by means of persons in the neighbourhood whom my father had brought for that purpose, and on whom he could rely, to a place in the vicinity he had fixed145 upon as secret and secure. This he urged him to do as expeditiously146 and quietly as possible, and to continue this employ, including also any other valuables he recollected148, till my father should send him word to stop, not attending to any reports that might be brought him. My father then rode on to town as far as Digbeth, and there 131 meeting the mob, he tried in vain to proceed. He met many of his friends, all of whom requested him to return, telling him he did not hear the threats that were uttered against him. At length, one of them, I believe Mr J. F——, suddenly turned his horse, and giving him a cut with his whip, the press was so great and the spirit of the horse so roused my father found himself obliged in a manner to return. Arriving at Dr Priestley’s gate before the mob, he stationed himself withinside till the mob came up, and then addressed them, endeavouring to induce them, by fair words and money, to desist and return home. At first they seemed a little pacified149 and inclined to listen, till one more loud than the rest, and who had the appearance of a ringleader, cried out, ‘Don’t take a sixpence of his money: in the riots of ’80 in London a man was hanged for only taking sixpence.’ They all then vociferated, ‘Stone him, stone him!’ and began to fling stones. My father then, finding it rashness to brave two or three thousand men, turned his horse and rode up to the house, telling William Priestley that he must desist and take as much care of the house as he could, and advising him to make all the doors and windows as secure as possible. He then rode off home and informed us he did not think our house yet in danger, but thought we had better remove with Dr and Mrs P. to Mr Thomas Hawkes, about half a mile off, for fear we should be suddenly surprised. During this time several messages were sent, and friends came to warn us of our danger. All seemed to apprehend150 the mob would visit us, and we had been advised to set out a barrel of ale on the lawn, thus attempting to pacify151 them and persuade them to desist. This done, and proper persons left to watch, we all walked up to Mr Hawkes’s. Here we found the family up and under great apprehension; and here we soon heard the shouts of the mob at Dr Priestley’s house (and I shall never forget what dreadful and hideous152 shouts they were), intermingled with a loud noise of battering153 against the walls, and such a confusion of cries, huzzas, etc., as cannot be imagined. Soon the flames burst forth154, and then all seemed quiet. What were the emotions of our minds at this moment no one can imagine unless they had beheld155 our countenances156 and heard the broken, short sentences that formed all the conversation which passed amongst us: yet 132 the extreme agitation157 of our minds did not prevent us from admiring the divine appearance of the excellent Dr Priestley. No human being could, in my opinion, appear in any trial more like divine, or show a nearer resemblance to our Saviour158, than he did then. Undaunted he heard the blows which were destroying the house and laboratory that contained all his valuable and rare apparatus159 and their effects, which it had been the business of his life to collect and use. All this apparatus, together with the uses he had made of them, the laborious160 exertions161 of his whole life, were being destroyed by a set of merciless, ignorant, lawless banditti, whilst he, tranquil162 and serene, walked up and down the road with a firm yet gentle pace that evinced his entire self-possession, and a complete self-satisfaction and consciousness which rendered him thus firm and resigned under the unjust and cruel persecution163 of his enemies; and with a countenance expressing the highest devotion, turned as it were from this scene and fixed with pure and calm resignation on him who suffered the administration of this bitter cup. Not one hasty or impatient expression, not one look expressive164 of murmur165 or complaint, not one tear or sigh escaped him; resignation and a conscious innocence166 and virtue167 seemed to subdue168 all these feelings of humanity.
“About four o’clock my father returned and informed us that as the fire had consumed the doctor’s house the mob were nearly dispersed, half drunk, having been up to their ankles in wine in his cellar, where they had broke the necks off all the bottles and inundated169 the cellar with that portion of their contents they could not drink; that the fields round were now covered with these fiends sleeping from drunkenness and fatigue170, and that as day was now come he thought it most likely they would disperse entirely, and that consequently we might return home again. Accordingly we set off, and never shall I forget the joy with which I entered our own gates once more.... A room was prepared for the Doctor and Mrs P. We all looked and felt our gratitude171; but the Doctor appeared the happiest amongst us. Just as he was going to rest, expressing his thankfulness in being permitted to lie down again in peace and comfort, my father returned from Fair Hill with the intelligence that they were collecting again, and their threats were more violent than ever, that they swore to find 133 Dr P. and take his life. The chaise was now ordered with all speed, and instead of the much-desired rest the Doctor and Mrs P. were obliged to dress again and get into it, scarcely knowing whither to go. Mr Ryland accompanied them, and it was thought most advisable to take a by-road to Heath, where Mrs Finch172, the Doctor’s daughter, lived, near Dudley.”
“He remained at Heath Forge,” says another account, “until Saturday, July 16th, meanwhile writing to Lindsey and to his sister, Mrs Crouch173, then living at Gildersome, fearing that she would receive false accounts through the newspapers. On the afternoon of that day he set off on horseback, with a servant, for Worcester, intending to catch the London mail that evening. But the fugitives174 lost their way on the Morfe, a common between Heath Forge and Bridgenorth, and wandered about all night. They, however, reached Kidderminster safely in the morning, and were met by Mr Ryland, who offered Priestley his own wig175 and coat by way of disguise. But the doctor declined. He had on a coat buttoned up to the chin, a wig and a cocked hat, with the point in front, his usual dress out of doors. Mr Ryland accompanied Priestley as far as Worcester, and arrived just in time to take a place for him in the mail to London. He travelled all night, reaching London between six and seven in the morning of Monday, July 18th, and went to his friend Lindsey’s in Essex Street, Strand176.”
Miss Russell’s apprehensions177 proved to be only too well-founded. Showell Green was destroyed, as were Bordesley Hall and Moseley Hall, and other houses in the vicinity of Moseley; Mr Ryland’s house at Easy Hill, and Mr Hutton’s house in High Street and his country seat at Wash Wood Heath.
On Sunday the rioters proceeded to King’s Wood, seven miles from Birmingham, and destroyed the meeting-house and the dwelling of the Dissenting178 minister. For the greater part of three days the town was in a state of siege, the majority of the shops were closed and business was at a stand-still. Attempts were made to organise45 a force of constables179, but the 134 number got together was insufficient180 to cope with the mob, and in an effort to protect Mr Ryland’s house the police were beaten after a severe contest, and many were wounded. A number of the rioters lost their lives; one man was killed by the fall of a coping stone from Priestley’s house and a number were wounded. At Easy Hill the drunken wretches181 in the cellars were overwhelmed by the falling in of the flaming roof, six were got out alive, but terribly burnt and bruised182, whilst ten dead bodies were dug out of the ruins.
Late on Sunday night three troops of dragoons reached the town:—
“Their arrival,” says a contemporary chronicler, “was announced by the sound of their trumpets183 and the acclamations of the inhabitants. Anxiety, which had been strongly depicted184 in every face during the day, was succeeded by the smiles of joy and the congratulations of neighbours. The town was illuminated185, the rioters, conscious of their delinquency, soon dispersed, and order was happily restored without bloodshed.”
The King, writing to Mr Secretary Dundas in approval of dragoons having been sent to Birmingham to quell the tumult, thus continues:—
“Though I cannot but feel better pleased that Priestley is the sufferer for the doctrines he and his party have instilled186, and that the people see them in their true light, yet I cannot approve of their having employed such atrocious means of showing their discontent.”
From Mr Lindsey’s house Priestley sent the following letter to the Birmingham Chronicle:—
“To the Inhabitants of the Town of Birmingham.
“My late Townsmen and Neighbours,—After living with you eleven years, in which you had uniform experience of my peaceful behaviour, in my attention to the quiet studies 135 of my profession and those of philosophy, I was far from expecting the injuries which I and my friends have lately received from you. But you have been misled. By hearing the Dissenters, and particularly the Unitarian Dissenters, continually railed at, as enemies to the present government in Church and State, you have been led to consider any injury done to us as a meritorious187 thing, and, not having been better informed, the means were not attended to. When the object was right you thought the means could not be wrong. By the discourses188 of your teachers, and the exclamations189 of your superiors in general, drinking confusion and damnation to us (which is well known to have been their frequent practice), your bigotry190 has been excited to the highest pitch, and nothing has been said to you to moderate your passions, but everything to inflame them; hence, without any consideration on your part or on theirs, who ought to have known and taught you better, you were prepared for every species of outrage, thinking that whatever you could do to spite and injure us was for the support of Government, and especially the Church. In destroying us you have been led to think you did God and your country the most substantial service.
“Happily the minds of Englishmen have a horror of murder, and therefore you did not, I hope, think of that, though by your clamorous191 demanding of me at the hotel it is probable that at that time some of you intended me some personal injury. But what is the value of life when everything is done to make it wretched? In many cases there would be greater mercy in dispatching the inhabitants than in burning their houses. However, I infinitely192 prefer what I feel from the spoiling of my goods to the disposition of those who have misled you.
“You have destroyed the most truly valuable and useful apparatus of philosophical instruments that perhaps any individual in this or any other country was ever possessed193 of, in my use of which I annually194 spent large sums, with no pecuniary195 view whatever, but only in the advancement196 of science, for the benefit of my country and of mankind. You have destroyed a library corresponding to that apparatus which no money can re-purchase, except in a course of time. But what I feel far more, you have destroyed manuscripts, which have been the result of the laborious study of many years, and which I 136 shall never be able to recompose; and this has been done to one who never did, or imagined you, any harm.
“I know nothing more of the hand-bill, which is said to have enraged197 you so much, than any of yourselves, and I disapprove198 of it as much, though it has been made the ostensible199 handle of doing infinitely more mischief than anything of that nature could possibly have done. In the celebration of the French Revolution, at which I did not attend, the company assembled on the occasion only expressed their joy in the emancipation200 of a neighbouring nation from tyranny, without intimating a desire of anything more than such an improvement of our own Constitution, as all sober citizens, of every persuasion201, have long wished for. And though, in answer to the gross and unprovoked calumnies202 of Mr Madan and others, I publicly vindicated203 my principles as a Dissenter76, it was only with plain and sober argument, and with perfect good-humour. We are better instructed in the mild and forbearing spirit of Christianity than ever to think of having recourse to violence; and can you think such conduct as yours any recommendation of your religious principles in preference to ours?
“You are still more mistaken if you imagine that this conduct of yours has any tendency to serve your cause or to injure ours. It is nothing but reason and argument that can ever support any system of religion. Answer your arguments and your business is done; but your having recourse to violence is only a proof that you have nothing better to produce. Should you destroy myself, as well as my house, library and apparatus, ten more persons of equal or superior spirit and ability would instantly rise up. If these ten were destroyed one hundred would appear; and believe me, that the Church of England, which you now think you are supporting, has received a greater blow by this conduct of yours than I and all my friends have ever aimed at it.
“Besides, to abuse those who have no power of making resistance is equally cowardly and brutal204, peculiarly unworthy of Englishmen, to say nothing of Christianity, which teaches us to do as we would be done by. In this business we are the sheep and you are the wolves. We will preserve our character, and hope you will change yours. At all events, we return you blessings207 for curses, and pray that you may soon 137 return to that industry and the sober manners for which the inhabitants of Birmingham were formerly208 distinguished209.—I am, your sincere well-wisher, J. Priestley.
“London, July 19, 1791.
“P.S.—The account of the first toast at the Revolution Dinner in the Times of this morning can be nothing less than a malicious210 lie. To prove this a list of the toasts, with an account of all the proceedings211 of the day, will soon be published. The first of these was The King and Constitution, and they were all such as the friends of liberty, and of the true principles of the Constitution, would approve.”
One of the earliest letters of sympathy he received was from his steadfast212 friend and benefactor213, Wedgwood. It was written from Weymouth, at that time the most fashionable seaside watering-place in England, and condoled214 with him on the “irreparable loss” he had “sustain’d from the brutality215, or rather let us hope the temporary insanity” of his neighbours.
“If they had arisen merely from the ungovern’d madness of a mob from the lowest order of our species, one would then lament216 all its effects like those of a storm or hurricane, but if there is reason to believe that the rabble were acted upon and encouraged to such proceedings by those who should be their superiors, one cannot but perceive the too evident spirit of the times, or of the place at least, by which you and so many of your worthy206 neighbours have suffered.”
Wedgwood then earnestly begs his friend to let him know how he can be of service to him:—
“Instruct me in the means of doing it and I shall esteem it as one of the strongest instances of your friendship.”
Priestley’s reply was written from the house of his son-in-law, William Finch, Heath Forge, Birmingham, and was as follows:—
“Your very kind and sympathising letter was very acceptable to me. The shock was no doubt very great, but I thank God I 138 have been able to bear it without any loss of health, or, indeed, of spirits. I begin to suffer most from want of employment and absence from my family, which indeed is irksome to me. My wife behaved with the greatest heroism217 at the time, but continuing in the neighbourhood, and hearing continually of the bad spirit that prevails in the place, I perceived that her mind began to be affected by it. She cannot remove, as my daughter expects to be brought to bed in about a month, and she cannot bear that her mother should be absent at the time. This circumstance adds much to my difficulty. Could we go together to some distant place for a month we should be much more comfortable. One good thing has already come out of this evil—I have a kind letter from Mr John Wilkinson inviting218 us to any house of his, and bidding me not to regard any losses that money can repair.”
His brother-in-law promptly sent him £500 after the riots, and subsequently transferred to him £10,000 in the French funds. As these were afterwards nonproductive he afterwards gave him an annuity219 of £200.
Immediately after the riots he received a great number of addresses and testimonials from his theological and philosophical admirers, and an address transmitted by Condorcet was sent to him from the French Academy of Sciences.
One of the earliest letters he dispatched from London was to Keir, under date July 22, 1791.
Priestley to Keir.
“I am very happy to see a copy of your letter to the printer of the Birmingham Chronicle, and in return enclose copies of my ‘Address to the Inhabitants of Birmingham,’ and of Mr Russell’s ‘Account of the Proceedings on July 14th.’ Both these have been in the London papers and I have just sent yours to the printer of the Morning Chronicle.
“I am happy to hear that all is quiet with you now, but when it will be proper for me to come to you I cannot tell. I fear not before the next Lunar Society. Whether I shall ever 139 have it in my power to collect another apparatus for experiments is quite uncertain, as indeed is, in a great measure, my settling again at Birmingham, though there is no place in the world that I should prefer to it.
“The extra copies of my last paper for the Philosophical Transactions are printed, and I shall soon send some to Mr Galton to be presented to each of the members of the Lunar Society.
“I beg my compliments to them, and as long as I live I shall with much satisfaction think of our many happy meetings.”
In a letter to Wedgwood, dated four days later, he sends two copies of his paper, and says:—
“I fear I shall not soon be able to furnish materials for another. Indeed, what I shall do, or where I shall settle, is uncertain. I shall, however, continue at Birmingham if possible, and resume all my pursuits, in which case I must thank you for a fresh stock of retorts, tubes, etc., etc., etc. This invasion of the Goths and Vandals I little foresaw, and hope it will never be repeated, as I fancy the experiment will not be found to answer.”
The next letter to Keir, dated July 29, 1791, is interesting as throwing further light upon the causes of the riots:—
“I never thought of returning to Birmingham till my friends there should think it safe and, on their accounts, advisable; and this, I now begin to fear, will not be so soon as you intimate. However, I am ready to attend the first summons, and earnestly wish it may be before the next Lunar Society. But your meeting must not depend upon this event.
“With this I send each of you a copy of my late, and I fear last, paper for the Philosophical Transactions. I shall always recollect147, with peculiar205 satisfaction and regret, our many cheerful and improving meetings; and if not a constant, shall indulge the hope of being an occasional, attendant.
“You were certainly a better judge than I was of the spirit of the times. But even you could not have expected such brutal excesses as have taken place; and yet I am willing to hope 140 much from time, from your seasonable letter, and the representations of the more calm and reasonable members of the Church of England, if not from the interposition of Government and the execution of the laws, in which I wish for moderation.
“I lately dined with Mr Sheridan, who said I should meet Mr Fox.[15] He, however, was prevented from attending, but desired Mr Sheridan to say that he wished to take the matter up in whatever manner we should think proper, by motion in the House on the subject. They conceive that the encouragement given to this High Church spirit by the Court arises from their willingness to crush Mr Fox, who has taken our part, and that they hoped by these measures to intimidate220 us into silence.
“This I can hardly think to be the case, and I am unwilling221 to connect our cause with that of any political party; since upon the face of it, as you have clearly shown, it is wholly of a religious nature. However, I said there would be time enough to take our measures before the next meeting of Parliament.”
Dr Withering222, himself a sufferer, hastened to express his sympathy. Priestley replied to his letters as follows:—
“Your generous contribution towards the re-establishment of my philosophical apparatus cannot but give me satisfaction, though I am sorry to be so burdensome to my friends, especially my fellow-sufferers, among whom you are ranked. But what the country will do towards indemnifying us appears very distant and uncertain, and my claims will be liable to the greatest uncertainty223, as the proof that may be required of my losses cannot be given.
“I am happy to find that your alarms and sufferings have no more affected your spirit and health than my own did mine, and that we may so soon expect your third volume.[16]
“It will be a considerable time, with every assistance that money can afford, before I can be at work again, and hardly 141 ever to so much advantage as at Birmingham. Such assistance from philosophical friends I should in vain look for here, and as long as I live I shall look back with pleasure and regret to our Lunar meetings, which I always enjoyed so much and from which I derived224 so much solid advantage. If I could find the same intelligence in any club of Philosophers here, I could not find the same frankness which is the charm of all society.
“I have nearly printed An Appeal to the Public on the subject of the late riot, and shall direct the printer to deliver you a copy.
“I am sensible that it will more exasperate225 my enemies, but it is addressed to our common judges, and may conciliate them, at least in a course of time.
“I have lately written to Mr Watt226, and desired him, or the Lunar Society as a body, to make a proposal to those who act for the country. I hope you will see the propriety227 of it and contribute to its effect.”
The Appeal evidently cost Priestley much pains in its composition. Part of it was sent in sheets to his intimate friends in Birmingham, notably228 Dr Withering, Mr Galton and Mr Russell, who conferred together and with Captain Keir as to the advisability of publishing it. Like him they were sensible that it would certainly more exasperate his enemies. Captain Keir endeavoured to dissuade229 him from its publication, at least in its proposed form, saying that it would “irritate his professed230 enemies, and furnish them with a new source of abuse,” and that he feared that “Government would become more remiss231 in prosecuting232 the magistrates and in protecting the Dissenters in future if they should meet with any passage that would give them offence.”
On learning the opinion of his friends Priestley wrote to Wedgwood:—
“I have desired the printer to send you a copy of my Appeal on the subject of the riots, in order to have your opinion and advice with respect to publishing of it. Several of my friends 142 in Birmingham, viz., Dr Withering, Mr Keir and Mr Galton, think that it had better be suppressed, or published with many alterations233 by way of softening234. Others, and especially my friends here, are for its speedy publication, or about the time of the meeting of Parliament. In this state of suspense I beg your perusal235 of it and your free opinion. I think that if I write at all it should not be with less spirit than I have usually shown, and that there is nothing more violent or offensive in this than in several of my preaching publications. But as others are interested in the event of this publication I am willing to be advised by them.”
On August 24, 1791, at the Warwick Assizes, John Green, John Clifton and Bartholomew Fisher were indicted236 for that they, with one William Jones, at large, with others, to the number of fifty and more, did, on the 15th of July, unlawfully and riotously237 assemble and with force of arms begin to pull down the dwelling-house of Joseph Priestley, LL.D. The jury found Green and Fisher guilty and Clifton not guilty.
John Stokes, for beginning to pull down the Old Meeting-House in Birmingham, was acquitted238, on account of the defects in the indictment239. The following was Baron240 Perryn’s sentence:—
“Prisoners, you have been convicted by very human and attentive241 juries of the enormous crimes of setting fire to and destroying the houses and property of your fellow-subjects in a manner as wanton as it was unprovoked. Your cry of ‘Church and King!’ was nothing but a pretext242 to commit depredation243 and robbery. The Law and Constitution is a sufficient shield to protect the Church and the sacred person of His Majesty and all his good subjects in their lives and property.
“At the same time the Law possesses sufficient energy and vigour244 to make examples of those bad citizens who wickedly and wantonly violate it.
“You, miserable245 criminals, are of that number, and it is necessary that your lives should atone246 for your crimes, as a public example. You must therefore be removed from this world; and I most 143 earnestly recommend you to employ the short space of time which will be allowed to you to make your peace with your offended Creator, who alone can grant that mercy which you must not expect from your country.”
Priestley’s own account of these proceedings, as given in his Memoirs247, is very na?ve and even studiously dispassionate. He says:—
“About two years before I left Birmingham, the question about the ‘Test Act’ was much agitated248 both in and out of Parliament. This, however, was altogether without any concurrence249 of mine. I only delivered, and published, a sermon on the 5th of November 1789, recommending the most peaceable method of pursuing our object. Mr Madan, however, the most respectable clergyman in the town, preaching and publishing a very inflammatory sermon on the subject, inveighing250 in the bitterest manner against the Dissenters in general and myself in particular, I addressed a number of ‘Familiar Letters to the Inhabitants of Birmingham’ in our defence. This produced a reply from him and other letters from me. All mine were written in an ironical251 and rather a pleasant manner, and in some of the last of them I introduced a further reply to Mr Burn, another clergyman in Birmingham, who had addressed to me ‘Letters on the Infallibility of the Testimony252 of the Apostles concerning the Person of Christ,’ after replying to his first set of letters, in a separate publication.
“From these small pieces I was far from expecting any serious consequences. But the Dissenters in general being very obnoxious253 to the Court, and it being imagined, though without any reason, that I had been the chief promoter of the measures which gave them offence, the clergy, not only in Birmingham but through all England, seemed to make it their business, by writing in the public papers, by preaching and other methods, to inflame the minds of the people against me. And on occasion of the celebration of the anniversary of the French Revolution, on July 14, 1791, by several of my friends, but with which I had little to do, a mob, encouraged by some persons in power, first burned the meeting-house in which I preached, then another meeting-house in the town, and then my dwelling-house, demolishing254 my library, apparatus and, as far 144 as they could, everything belonging to me. They also burned, or much damaged, the houses of many Dissenters, chiefly my friends.
“The criminality of the magistrates and other principal High Churchmen at Birmingham in promoting the riot remains255 acknowledged. Indeed, many circumstances which have appeared since that time show that the friends of the Court, if not the Prime Ministers themselves, were the favourers of that riot, having, no doubt, thought to intimidate the friends of liberty by the measure.”
“The years following the riot of 1791,” wrote Mr Matthew Devonport Hill, “witnessed various displays of hostile sentiment. In preparation for a municipal dinner shortly after that event, of which a member of the powerful and wealthy party opposed to French principles bore the cost, the list of guests accustomed prior to the outbreak to be invited on public occasions had been sedulously256 cleared of adverse257 elements. By inadvertence, however, the name of Dr Parr was retained; and the sturdy divine, although he must have surmised258 that he would be the only representative of his opinions, duly obeyed the summons. The cloth being drawn259, the Chairman proposed, as the Doctor no doubt expected, the toast of ‘Church and King.’
“Parr instantly started to his feet, proclaiming in a stern voice his dissent77. ‘No, sir,’ said he, ‘I will not drink that toast. It was the cry of Jacobites; it is the cry of incendiaries. It means a Church without the Gospel, and a King above the Law!’”
点击收听单词发音
1 graphic | |
adj.生动的,形象的,绘画的,文字的,图表的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 sketch | |
n.草图;梗概;素描;v.素描;概述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pathos | |
n.哀婉,悲怆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 maniacal | |
adj.发疯的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 philosophic | |
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 prospects | |
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 embarrassment | |
n.尴尬;使人为难的人(事物);障碍;窘迫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 attaining | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的现在分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 pillaging | |
v.抢劫,掠夺( pillage的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 contented | |
adj.满意的,安心的,知足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 embitter | |
v.使苦;激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 serene | |
adj. 安详的,宁静的,平静的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 esteem | |
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 approbation | |
n.称赞;认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 bland | |
adj.淡而无味的,温和的,无刺激性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 halcyon | |
n.平静的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 untoward | |
adj.不利的,不幸的,困难重重的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 mischief | |
n.损害,伤害,危害;恶作剧,捣蛋,胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 instigated | |
v.使(某事物)开始或发生,鼓动( instigate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 invoked | |
v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 vengeance | |
n.报复,报仇,复仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 lust | |
n.性(淫)欲;渴(欲)望;vi.对…有强烈的欲望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 awe | |
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 organise | |
vt.组织,安排,筹办 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 trepidation | |
n.惊恐,惶恐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 foretell | |
v.预言,预告,预示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 disquieted | |
v.使不安,使忧虑,使烦恼( disquiet的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 restive | |
adj.不安宁的,不安静的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 thraldom | |
n.奴隶的身份,奴役,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 conflagration | |
n.建筑物或森林大火 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 memorable | |
adj.值得回忆的,难忘的,特别的,显著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 catastrophe | |
n.大灾难,大祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 sterile | |
adj.不毛的,不孕的,无菌的,枯燥的,贫瘠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 polemic | |
n.争论,论战 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 thorny | |
adj.多刺的,棘手的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 tracts | |
大片土地( tract的名词复数 ); 地带; (体内的)道; (尤指宣扬宗教、伦理或政治的)短文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 upwards | |
adv.向上,在更高处...以上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 resentment | |
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 disaffected | |
adj.(政治上)不满的,叛离的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 abhorred | |
v.憎恶( abhor的过去式和过去分词 );(厌恶地)回避;拒绝;淘汰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 subversive | |
adj.颠覆性的,破坏性的;n.破坏份子,危险份子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 odious | |
adj.可憎的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 sincerity | |
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 strenuous | |
adj.奋发的,使劲的;紧张的;热烈的,狂热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 transacting | |
v.办理(业务等)( transact的现在分词 );交易,谈判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 dissenter | |
n.反对者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 dissenters | |
n.持异议者,持不同意见者( dissenter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 dreaded | |
adj.令人畏惧的;害怕的v.害怕,恐惧,担心( dread的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 promulgation | |
n.颁布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 gunpowder | |
n.火药 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 dormant | |
adj.暂停活动的;休眠的;潜伏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 superstition | |
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 inflame | |
v.使燃烧;使极度激动;使发炎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 edifice | |
n.宏伟的建筑物(如宫殿,教室) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 allusion | |
n.暗示,间接提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 mischievous | |
adj.调皮的,恶作剧的,有害的,伤人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 ferment | |
vt.使发酵;n./vt.(使)激动,(使)动乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 magistrates | |
地方法官,治安官( magistrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 magistrate | |
n.地方行政官,地方法官,治安官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 promptly | |
adv.及时地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 avowing | |
v.公开声明,承认( avow的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 attachment | |
n.附属物,附件;依恋;依附 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 exulting | |
vi. 欢欣鼓舞,狂喜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 brewing | |
n. 酿造, 一次酿造的量 动词brew的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 rumours | |
n.传闻( rumour的名词复数 );风闻;谣言;谣传 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 postpone | |
v.延期,推迟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 countermanded | |
v.取消(命令),撤回( countermand的过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 tumult | |
n.喧哗;激动,混乱;吵闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 temperate | |
adj.温和的,温带的,自我克制的,不过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 benevolent | |
adj.仁慈的,乐善好施的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 diffused | |
散布的,普及的,扩散的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 emblematic | |
adj.象征的,可当标志的;象征性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 majesty | |
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 alabaster | |
adj.雪白的;n.雪花石膏;条纹大理石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 obelisk | |
n.方尖塔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 festive | |
adj.欢宴的,节日的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 disperse | |
vi.使分散;使消失;vt.分散;驱散 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 dispersed | |
adj. 被驱散的, 被分散的, 散布的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 disturbance | |
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 bent | |
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 assailed | |
v.攻击( assail的过去式和过去分词 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 ERECTED | |
adj. 直立的,竖立的,笔直的 vt. 使 ... 直立,建立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 uncommon | |
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 elegance | |
n.优雅;优美,雅致;精致,巧妙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 demolished | |
v.摧毁( demolish的过去式和过去分词 );推翻;拆毁(尤指大建筑物);吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 frenzy | |
n.疯狂,狂热,极度的激动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 quell | |
v.压制,平息,减轻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 connived | |
v.密谋 ( connive的过去式和过去分词 );搞阴谋;默许;纵容 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 rabble | |
n.乌合之众,暴民;下等人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 dwelling | |
n.住宅,住所,寓所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 doomed | |
命定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 impending | |
a.imminent, about to come or happen | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 gleaned | |
v.一点点地收集(资料、事实)( glean的过去式和过去分词 );(收割后)拾穗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 countenance | |
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 procuring | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的现在分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 quelling | |
v.(用武力)制止,结束,镇压( quell的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 suspense | |
n.(对可能发生的事)紧张感,担心,挂虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 expeditiously | |
adv.迅速地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 recollect | |
v.回忆,想起,记起,忆起,记得 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 recollected | |
adj.冷静的;镇定的;被回忆起的;沉思默想的v.记起,想起( recollect的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 pacified | |
使(某人)安静( pacify的过去式和过去分词 ); 息怒; 抚慰; 在(有战争的地区、国家等)实现和平 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 apprehend | |
vt.理解,领悟,逮捕,拘捕,忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 pacify | |
vt.使(某人)平静(或息怒);抚慰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 hideous | |
adj.丑陋的,可憎的,可怕的,恐怖的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 battering | |
n.用坏,损坏v.连续猛击( batter的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 beheld | |
v.看,注视( behold的过去式和过去分词 );瞧;看呀;(叙述中用于引出某人意外的出现)哎哟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 countenances | |
n.面容( countenance的名词复数 );表情;镇静;道义支持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 agitation | |
n.搅动;搅拌;鼓动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 saviour | |
n.拯救者,救星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 apparatus | |
n.装置,器械;器具,设备 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 laborious | |
adj.吃力的,努力的,不流畅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 exertions | |
n.努力( exertion的名词复数 );费力;(能力、权力等的)运用;行使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 tranquil | |
adj. 安静的, 宁静的, 稳定的, 不变的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 persecution | |
n. 迫害,烦扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 expressive | |
adj.表现的,表达…的,富于表情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 murmur | |
n.低语,低声的怨言;v.低语,低声而言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 subdue | |
vt.制服,使顺从,征服;抑制,克制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 inundated | |
v.淹没( inundate的过去式和过去分词 );(洪水般地)涌来;充满;给予或交予(太多事物)使难以应付 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 fatigue | |
n.疲劳,劳累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 finch | |
n.雀科鸣禽(如燕雀,金丝雀等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 crouch | |
v.蹲伏,蜷缩,低头弯腰;n.蹲伏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 fugitives | |
n.亡命者,逃命者( fugitive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 wig | |
n.假发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 strand | |
vt.使(船)搁浅,使(某人)困于(某地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 apprehensions | |
疑惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 dissenting | |
adj.不同意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 constables | |
n.警察( constable的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 insufficient | |
adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 wretches | |
n.不幸的人( wretch的名词复数 );可怜的人;恶棍;坏蛋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 bruised | |
[医]青肿的,瘀紫的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 trumpets | |
喇叭( trumpet的名词复数 ); 小号; 喇叭形物; (尤指)绽开的水仙花 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 depicted | |
描绘,描画( depict的过去式和过去分词 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 illuminated | |
adj.被照明的;受启迪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 instilled | |
v.逐渐使某人获得(某种可取的品质),逐步灌输( instill的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 meritorious | |
adj.值得赞赏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 discourses | |
论文( discourse的名词复数 ); 演说; 讲道; 话语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 exclamations | |
n.呼喊( exclamation的名词复数 );感叹;感叹语;感叹词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 bigotry | |
n.偏见,偏执,持偏见的行为[态度]等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 clamorous | |
adj.吵闹的,喧哗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 infinitely | |
adv.无限地,无穷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 annually | |
adv.一年一次,每年 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 pecuniary | |
adj.金钱的;金钱上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 advancement | |
n.前进,促进,提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 enraged | |
使暴怒( enrage的过去式和过去分词 ); 歜; 激愤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 disapprove | |
v.不赞成,不同意,不批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 ostensible | |
adj.(指理由)表面的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 emancipation | |
n.(从束缚、支配下)解放 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 calumnies | |
n.诬蔑,诽谤,中伤(的话)( calumny的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 vindicated | |
v.澄清(某人/某事物)受到的责难或嫌疑( vindicate的过去式和过去分词 );表明或证明(所争辩的事物)属实、正当、有效等;维护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 blessings | |
n.(上帝的)祝福( blessing的名词复数 );好事;福分;因祸得福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 malicious | |
adj.有恶意的,心怀恶意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 steadfast | |
adj.固定的,不变的,不动摇的;忠实的;坚贞不移的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 benefactor | |
n. 恩人,行善的人,捐助人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 condoled | |
v.表示同情,吊唁( condole的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 brutality | |
n.野蛮的行为,残忍,野蛮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 lament | |
n.悲叹,悔恨,恸哭;v.哀悼,悔恨,悲叹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 heroism | |
n.大无畏精神,英勇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 inviting | |
adj.诱人的,引人注目的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 annuity | |
n.年金;养老金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 intimidate | |
vt.恐吓,威胁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 unwilling | |
adj.不情愿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 withering | |
使人畏缩的,使人害羞的,使人难堪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 exasperate | |
v.激怒,使(疾病)加剧,使恶化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 watt | |
n.瓦,瓦特 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 propriety | |
n.正当行为;正当;适当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 dissuade | |
v.劝阻,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 remiss | |
adj.不小心的,马虎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 prosecuting | |
检举、告发某人( prosecute的现在分词 ); 对某人提起公诉; 继续从事(某事物); 担任控方律师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 alterations | |
n.改动( alteration的名词复数 );更改;变化;改变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 softening | |
变软,软化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 perusal | |
n.细读,熟读;目测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 indicted | |
控告,起诉( indict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 riotously | |
adv.骚动地,暴乱地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 acquitted | |
宣判…无罪( acquit的过去式和过去分词 ); 使(自己)作出某种表现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 indictment | |
n.起诉;诉状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 baron | |
n.男爵;(商业界等)巨头,大王 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 attentive | |
adj.注意的,专心的;关心(别人)的,殷勤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 pretext | |
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 depredation | |
n.掠夺,蹂躏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 miserable | |
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 atone | |
v.赎罪,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 memoirs | |
n.回忆录;回忆录传( mem,自oir的名词复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 agitated | |
adj.被鼓动的,不安的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 concurrence | |
n.同意;并发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 inveighing | |
v.猛烈抨击,痛骂,谩骂( inveigh的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 ironical | |
adj.讽刺的,冷嘲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 obnoxious | |
adj.极恼人的,讨人厌的,可憎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 demolishing | |
v.摧毁( demolish的现在分词 );推翻;拆毁(尤指大建筑物);吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 sedulously | |
ad.孜孜不倦地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 adverse | |
adj.不利的;有害的;敌对的,不友好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 surmised | |
v.臆测,推断( surmise的过去式和过去分词 );揣测;猜想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |