Let me explain.
I was very unhappy during that period, personally, profes-sionally, and emotionally, and my life was feeling like a failure on all levels. As I’d been in the habit for years of writing my thoughts down in letters (which I usually never delivered), I picked up my trusty yellow legal pad and began pouring out my feelings.
This time, rather than another letter to another person I imagined to be victimizing me, I thought I’d go straight to the source; straight to the greatest victimizer of them all. I decided1 to write a letter to God.
It was a spiteful, passionate2 letter, full of confusions, con-tortions, and condemnations. And a pile of angry questions.
Why wasn’t my life working? What would it take to get it to work? Why could I not find happiness in relationships? Was the experience of adequate money going to elude4 me forever? Finally—and most emphatically—What had I done to deserve a life of such continuing struggle?
To my surprise, as I scribbled5 out the last of my bitter, unanswerable questions and prepared to toss my pen aside, my hand remained poised6 over the paper, as if held there by some invisible force. Abruptly7, the pen began moving on its own. I had no idea what I was about to write, but an idea seemed to be coming, so I decided to flow with it. Out came...
Do you really want an answer to all these questions, or are you just venting8?
I blinked... and then my mind came up with a reply. I wrote that down, too.
Both. I’m venting, sure, but if these questions have answers, I’d sure as hell like to hear them!
You are “sure as hell”. . .about a lot of things. But wouldn’t it be nice to be “sure as Heaven”?
And I wrote:
What is that supposed to mean?
Before I knew it, I had begun a conversation.. .and I was not writing so much as taking dictation.
That dictation went on for three years, and at the time, I had no idea where it was going. The answers to the questions I was putting on paper never came to me until the question was completely written and I’d put my own thoughts away. Often the answers came faster than I could write, and I found myself scribbling9 to keep up. When I became confused, or lost the feeling that the words were coming from somewhere else, I put the pen down and walked away from the dialogue until I again felt inspired—sorry, that’s the only word which truly fits—to return to the yellow legal pad and start transcribing10 again.
These conversations are still going on as I write this. And much of it is found on the pages which follow.. .pages which contain an astounding11 dialogue which at first I disbelieved, then assumed to be of personal value, but which I now understand was meant for more than just me. It was meant for you and everyone else who has come to this material. For my questions are your questions.
I want you to get into this dialogue as soon as you can, because what’s really important here is not my story, but yours. It is your life story which brought you here. It is your personal experience to which this material has relevance12. Otherwise you would not be here, with it, right now.
So let’s enter the dialogue with a question I had been asking for a very long time: How does God talk, and to whom? When I asked this question, here’s the answer I received:
I talk to everyone. All the time. The question is not to whom do I talk, but who listens?
Intrigued13, I asked God to expand on this subject. Here’s what God said:
First, jet’s exchange the word talk with the word communicate. It’s a much better word, a much fuller, more accurate one. When we try to speak to each other—Me to you, you to Me, we are immediately constricted14 by the unbelievable limitation of words. For this reason, I do not communicate by words alone. In fact, rarely do I do so. My most common form of communication is through feeling.
Feeling is the language of the soul.
If you want to know what’s true for you about something, look to how you’re feeling about it.
Feelings are sometimes difficult to discover—and often even more difficult to acknowledge. Yet hidden in your deepest feelings is your highest truth.
The trick is to get to those feelings. I will show you how. Again. If you wish.
I told God that I did wish, but that right now I wished even more for a complete and full answer to my first question. Here’s what God said:
I also communicate with thought. Thought and feelings are not the same, although they can occur at the same time. In communicating with thought, I often use images and pictures. For this reason, thoughts are more effective than mere15 words as tools of communi-cation.
In addition to feelings and thoughts, I also use the vehicle of experience as a grand communicator.
And finally, when feelings and thoughts and expe-rience all fail, I use words. Words are really the least effective communicator. They are most open to misinterpretation, most often misunderstood.
And why is that? It is because of what words are. Words are merely utterances18: noises that stand for feelings, thoughts, and experience. They are symbols. Signs. Insignias. They are not Truth. They are not the real thing.
Words may help you understand something. Expe-rience allows you to know. Yet there are some things you cannot experience. So I have given you other tools of knowing. And these are called feelings. And so too, thoughts.
Now the supreme19 irony20 here is that you have all placed so much importance on the Word of God, and so little on the experience.
In fact, you place so little value on experience that when what you experience of God differs from what you’ve heard of God, you automatically discard the experience and own the words, when it should be just the other way around.
Your experience and your feelings about a thing represent what you factually and intuitively know about that thing. Words can only seek to symbolize21 what you know, and can often confuse what you know.
These, then, are the tools with which I communi-cate, yet they are not the methods, for not all feelings, not all thoughts, not all experience, and not all words are from Me.
Many words have been uttered by others, in My name. Many thoughts and many feelings have been sponsored by causes not of My direct creation. Many experiences result from these.
The challenge is one of discernment. The difficulty is knowing the difference between messages from God and data from other sources. Discrimination is a simple matter with the application of a basic rule:
Mine is always your Highest Thought, your Clearest Word, your Grandest Feeling. Anything less is from another source.
Now the task of differentiation22 becomes easy, for it should not be difficult even for the beginning student to identify the Highest, the Clearest, and the Grandest.
Yet will I give you these guidelines:
The Highest Thought is always that thought which contains joy. The Clearest Words are those words which contain truth. The Grandest Feeling is that feel-ing which you call love.
Joy, truth, love.
These three are interchangeable, and one always leads to the other. It matters not in which order they are placed.
Having with these guidelines determined23 which messages are Mine and which have come from another source, the only question remaining is whether My messages will be heeded25.
Most of My messages are not. Some, because they seem too good to be true. Others, because they seem too difficult to follow. Many, because they are simply misunderstood. Most, because they are not received.
My most powerful messenger is experience, and even this you ignore. Especially this you ignore.
Your world would not be in its present condition were you to have simply listened to your experience. The result of your not listening to your experience is that you keep re-living it, over and over again. For My purpose will not be thwarted27, nor My will be ignored. You will get the message. Sooner or later.
I will not force you to, however. I will never coerce28 you. For I have given you a free will—the power to do as you choose—and I will never take that away from you, ever.
And so I will continue sending you the same messages over and over again, throughout the millen-nia and to whatever corner of the universe you oc-cupy. Endlessly will I send you My messages, until you have received them and held them close, calling them your own.
My messages will come in a hundred forms, at a thousand moments, across a million years. You cannot miss them if you truly listen. You cannot ignore them once truly heard. Thus will our communication begin in earnest. For in the past you have only talked to Me, praying to Me, interceding29 with Me, beseeching30 Me. Yet now can I talk back to you, even as I am doing here.
How can I know this communication is from God? How do I know this is not my own imagination?
What would be the difference? Do you not see that I could just as easily work through your imagination as anything else? I will bring you the exact right thoughts, words or feelings, at any given moment, suited precisely31 to the purpose at hand, using one device, or several.
You will know these words are from Me because you, of your own accord, have never spoken so clearly. Had you already spoken so clearly on these questions, you would not be asking them.
To whom does God communicate? Are there special people? Are there special times?
All people are special, and all moments are golden. There is no person and there is no time one more special than another. Many people choose to believe that God communicates in special ways and only with special people. This removes the mass of the people from responsibility for hearing My message, much less receiving it (which is another matter), and allows them to take someone else’s word for everything. You don’t have to listen to Me, for you’ve already decided that others have heard from Me on every subject, and you have them to listen to.
By listening to what other people think they heard Me say, you don’t have to think at all.
This is the biggest reason for most people turning from My messages on a personal level. If you acknow-ledge that you are receiving My messages directly, then you are responsible for interpreting them. It is far safer and much easier to accept the interpretation16 of others (even others who have lived 2,000 years ago) than seek to interpret the message you may very well be receiving in this moment now.
Yet I invite you to a new form of communication with God. A two-way communication. In truth, it is you who have invited Me. For I have come to you, in this form, right now, in answer to your call.
Why do some people, take Christ, for example, seem to hear more of Your communication than others?
Because some people are willing to actually listen. They are willing to hear, and they are willing to remain open to the communication even when it seems scary, or crazy, or downright wrong.
We should listen to God even when what’s being said seems wrong?
Especially when it seems wrong. If you think you are right about everything, who needs to talk with God?
Go ahead and act on all that you know. But notice that you’ve all been doing that since time began. And look at what shape the world is in. Clearly, you’ve missed something. Obviously, there is something you don’t understand. That which you do understand must seem right to you, because “right” is a term you use to designate something with which you agree. What you’ve missed will, therefore, appear at first to be
The only way to move forward on this is to ask yourself, “What would happen if everything I thought was ‘wrong’ was actually ‘right’?” Every great scientist knows about this. When what a scientist does is not working, a scientist sets aside all of the assumptions and starts over. All great discoveries have been made from a willingness, and ability, to not be right. And that’s what’s needed here.
You cannot know God until you’ve stopped telling yourself that you already know God. You cannot hear God until you stop thinking that you’ve already heard God.
I cannot tell you My Truth until you stop telling Me yours.
But my truth about God comes from You.
Who said so?
Others.
What others?
Leaders. Ministers. Rabbis. Priests. Books. The Bible, for heaven’s sake!
Those are not authoritative32 sources.
They aren’t?
No.
Then what is?
Listen to your feelings. Listen to your Highest Thoughts. Listen to your experience. Whenever any one of these differ from what you’ve been told by your teachers, or read in your books, forget the words. Words are the least reliable purveyor33 of Truth.
There is so much I want to say to You, so much I want to ask. I don’t know where to begin.
For instance, why is it that You do not reveal Yourself? If there really is a God, and You are It, why do You not reveal Yourself in a way we can all understand?
I have done so, over and over. I am doing so again right now.
No. I mean by a method of revelation that is incontrovert-ible; that cannot be denied.
Such as?
Such as appearing right now before my eyes.
I am doing so right now.
Where?
Everywhere you look.
No, I mean in an incontrovertible way. In a way no man could deny.
What way would that be? In what form or shape would you have Me appear?
In the form or shape that you actually have.
That would be impossible, for I have no form or shape you understand. I could adopt a form or shape that you could understand, but then everyone would assume that what they have seen is the one and only form and shape of God, rather than a form or shape of God—one of many.
People believe I am what they see Me as, rather than what they do not see. But I am the Great Unseen, not what I cause Myself to be in any particular moment. In a sense, I am what I am not. It is from the am-notness that I come, and to it I always return.
Yet when I come in one particular form or an-other—a form in which I think people can understand Me—people assign Me that form forevermore.
And should I come in any other form, to any other people, the first say I did not appear to the second, because I did not look to the second as I did to the first, nor say the same things—so how could it have been Me?
You see, then, it matters not in what form or in what manner I reveal Myself—whatever manner I choose and whatever form I take, none will be incontrovertible.
But if You did something that would evidence the truth of who You are beyond doubt or question...
.there are still those who would say, it is of the devil, or simply someone’s imagination. Or any cause other than Me.
If I revealed myself as God Almighty34, King of Heaven and Earth, and moved mountains to prove it, there are those who would say, “It must have been Satan.”
And such is as it should be. For God does not reveal Godself to Godself from or through outward observa-tion, but through inward experience. And when inward experience has revealed Godself, outward observation is not necessary. And if outward observation is neces-sary, inward experience is not possible.
If, then, revelation is requested, it cannot be had, for the act of asking is a statement that it is not there; that nothing of God is now being revealed. Such a statement produces the experience. For your thought about something is creative, and your word is productive, and your thought and your word together are magnificently effective in giving birth to your reality. Therefore shall you experience that God is not now revealed, for if God were, you would not ask God to be.
Does that mean I cannot ask for anything I want? Are You saying that praying for something actually pushes it away from us?
This is a question which has been asked through the Ages—and has been answered whenever it has been asked. Yet you have not heard the answer, or will not believe it.
The question is answered again, in today’s terms, and today’s language, thusly:
You will not have that for which you ask, nor can you have anything you want. This is because your very request is a statement of lack, and your saying you want a thing only works to produce that precise experi-ence—wanting—in your reality.
The correct prayer is therefore never a prayer of supplication35, but a prayer of gratitude36.
When you thank God in advance for that which you choose to experience in your reality, you, in effect, acknowledge that it is there... in effect. Thankfulness is thus the most powerful statement to God; an affirma-tion that even before you ask, I have answered.
Therefore never supplicate37. Appreciate.
But what if I am grateful to God in advance for something, and it never shows up? That could lead to disillusionment and bitterness.
Gratitude cannot be used as a tool with which to manipulate God; a device with which to fool the universe. You cannot lie to yourself. Your mind knows the truth of your thoughts. If you are saying “Thank you, God, for such and such,” all the while being very clear that it isn’t there in your present reality, you can’t expect God to be less clear than you, and so produce it for you.
God knows what you know, and what you know is what appears as your reality.
But how then can I be truly grateful for something I know is not there?
Faith. If you have but the faith of a mustard seed, you shall move mountains. You come to know it is there because I said it is there; because I said that, even before you ask, I shall have answered; because I said, and have said to you in every conceivable way, through every teacher you can name, that whatsoever38 you shall choose, choosing it in My Name, so shall it be.
Yet so many people say that their prayers have gone unan-swered.
No prayer—and a prayer is nothing more than a fervent39 statement of what is so—goes unanswered. Every prayer—every thought, every statement, every feeling—is creative. To the degree that it is fervently40 held as truth, to that degree will it be made manifest in your experience.
When it is said that a prayer has not been answered, what has in actuality happened is that the most fervently held thought, word, or feeling has become operative. Yet what you must know—and here is the secret—is that always it is the thought behind the thought—what might be called the Sponsoring Thought—that is the controlling thought.
If, therefore, you beg and supplicate, there seems a much smaller chance that you will experience what you think you are choosing, because the Sponsoring Thought behind every supplication is that you do not have now what you wish. That Sponsoring Thought becomes your reality.
The only Sponsoring Thought which could override41 this thought is the thought held in faith that God will grant whatever is asked, without fail. Some people have such faith, but very few.
The process of prayer becomes much easier when, rather than having to believe that God will always say “yes” to every request, one understands intuitively that the request itself is not necessary. Then the prayer is a prayer of thanksgiving. It is not a request at all, but a statement of gratitude for what is so.
When you say that a prayer is a statement of what is so, are you saying that God does nothing; that everything which happens after a prayer is a result of the prayer’s action?
If you believe that God is some omnipotent42 being who hears all prayers, says “yes” to some, “no” to others, and “maybe, but not now” to the rest, you are mistaken. By what rule of thumb would God decide?
If you believe that God is the creator and decider of all things in your life, you are mistaken.
God is the observer, not the creator. And God stands ready to assist you in living your life, but not in the way you might expect.
It is not God’s function to create, or uncreate, the circumstances or conditions of your life. God created you, in the image and likeness43 of God. You have created the rest, through the power God has given you. God created the process of life and life itself as you know it. Yet God gave you free choice, to do with life as you will.
In this sense, your will for you is God’s will for you.
You are living your life the way you are living your life, and I have no preference in the matter.
This is the grand illusion in which you have engaged:
that God cares one way or the other what you do.
I do not care what you do, and that is hard for you to hear. Yet do you care what your children do when you send them out to play? Is it a matter of consequence to you whether they play tag, or hide and seek, or pretend? No, it is not, because you know they are perfectly44 safe. You have placed them in an environment which you consider friendly and very okay.
Of course, you will always hope that they do not hurt themselves. And if they do, you will be right there to help them, heal them, allow them to feel safe again, to be happy again, to go and play again another day. But whether they choose hide and seek or pretend will not matter to you the next day, either.
You will tell them, of course, which games are dangerous to play. But you cannot stop your children from doing dangerous things. Not always. Not forever. Not in every moment from now until death. It is the wise parent who knows this. Yet the parent never stops caring about the outcome. It is this dichotomy—not caring deeply about the process, but caring deeply about the result—that comes close to describing the dichotomy of God.
Yet God, in a sense, does not even care about the
outcome. Not the ultimate outcome. This is because the
ultimate outcome is assured.
And this is the second great illusion of man: that the
outcome of life is in doubt.
It is this doubt about ultimate outcome that has created your greatest enemy, which is fear. For if you doubt outcome, then you must doubt Creator—you must doubt God. And if you doubt God, you must live in fear and guilt45 all your life.
If you doubt God’s intentions—and God’s ability to
produce this ultimate result—then how can you ever
relax? How can you ever truly find peace?
Yet God has full power to match intentions with results. You cannot and will not believe in this (even though you claim that God is all-powerful), and so you have to create in your imagination a power equal to God, in order that you may find a way for God’s will to be thwarted. And so you have created in your mythol-ogy the being you call “devil.” You have even imagined a God at war with this being (thinking that God solves problems the way you do). Finally, you have actually imagined that God could lose this war.
All of this violates everything you say you know about
God, but this doesn’t matter. You live your illusion, and thus feel your fear, all out of your decision to doubt God.
But what if you made a new decision? What then would be the result?
I tell you this: you would live as the Buddha46 did. As Jesus did. As did every saint you have ever idolized.
Yet, as with most of those saints, people would not understand you. And when you tried to explain your sense of peace, your joy in life, your inner ecstasy47, they would listen to your words, but not hear them. They would try to repeat your words, but would add to them.
They would wonder how you could have what they cannot find. And then they would grow jealous. Soon jealousy48 would turn to rage, and in their anger they would try to convince you that it is you who do not understand God.
And if they were unsuccessful at tearing you from your joy, they would seek to harm you, so enormous would be their rage. And when you told them it does not matter, that even death cannot interrupt your joy, nor change your truth, they would surely kill you. Then, when they saw the peace with which you accepted death, they would call you saint, and love you again.
For it is the nature of people to love, then destroy, then love again that which they value most.
But why? Why do we do that?
All human actions are motivated at their deepest level by one of two emotions—fear or love. In truth there are only two emotions-only two words in the language of the soul. These are the opposite ends of the great polarity which I created when I produced the universe, and your world, as you know it today.
These are the two points—the Alpha and the Omega—which allow the system you call “relativity” to be. Without these two points, without these two ideas about things, no other idea could exist.
Every human thought, and every human action, is based in either love or fear. There is no other human motivation, and all other ideas are but derivatives49 of these two. They are simply different versions—different twists on the same theme.
Think on this deeply and you will see that it is true. This is what I have called the Sponsoring Thought. It is either a thought of love or fear. This is the thought behind the thought behind the thought. It is the first thought. It is prime force. It is the raw energy that drives the engine of human experience.
And here is how human behavior produces repeat experience after repeat experience; it is why humans love, then destroy, then love again: always there is the swing from one emotion to the other. Love sponsors fear sponsors love sponsors fear.
.And the reason is found in the first lie—the lie which you hold as the truth about God—that God cannot be trusted; that God’s love cannot be depended upon; that God’s acceptance of you is conditional50; that the ultimate outcome is thus in doubt. For if you cannot depend on God’s love to always be there, on whose love can you depend? If God retreats and withdraws when you do not perform properly, will not mere mortals also?
.And so it is that in the moment you pledge your highest love, you greet your greatest fear.
For the first thing you worry about after saying “I love you” is whether you’ll hear it back. And if you hear it back, then you begin immediately to worry that the love you have just found, you will lose. And so all action becomes a reaction—defense51 against loss—even as you seek to defend yourself against the loss of God.
Yet if you knew Who You Are—that you are the most magnificent, the most remarkable52, the most splen-did being God has ever created—you would never fear. For who could reject such wondrous53 magnificence? Not even God could find fault in such a being.
But you do not know Who You Are, and you think you are a great deal less. And where did you get the idea of how much less than magnificent you are? From the only people whose word you would take on every-thing. From your mother and your father.
These are the people who love you the most. Why would they lie to you? Yet have they not told you that you are too much of this, and not enough of that? Have they not reminded you that you are to be seen and not heard? Have they not scolded you in some of the moments of your greatest exuberance54? And, did they not encourage you to set aside some of your wildest imagining?
These are the messages you’ve received, and though they do not meet the criteria55, and are thus not messages from God, they might as well have been, for they have come from the gods of your universe surely enough.
It was your parents who taught you that love is conditional—you have felt their conditions many times—and that is the experience you take into your own love relationships.
It is also the experience you bring to Me.
From this experience you draw your conclusions about Me. Within this framework you speak your truth. “God is a loving God,” you say, “but if you break His commandments, He will punish you with eternal ban-ishment and everlasting56 damnation.”
For have you not experienced the banishment57 of your own parents? Do you not know the pain of their damnation? How, then, could you imagine it to be any different with Me?
You have forgotten what it was like to be loved without condition. You do not remember the experi-ence of the love of God. And so you try to imagine what God’s love must be like, based on what you see of love in the world.
You have projected the role of “parent” onto God, and have thus come up with a God Who judges and rewards or punishes, based on how good He feels about what you’ve been up to. But this is a simplistic view of God, based on your mythology58. It has nothing to do with Who I Am.
Having thus created an entire thought system about God based on human experience rather than spiritual truths, you then create an entire reality around love. It is a fear-based reality, rooted in the idea of a fearful, vengeful God. Its Sponsoring Thought is wrong, but to deny that thought would be to disrupt your whole theology. And though the new theology which would replace it would truly be your salvation59, you cannot accept it, because the idea of a God Who is not to be feared, Who will not judge, and Who has no cause to punish is simply too magnificent to be embraced within even your grandest notion of Who and What God is.
This fear-based love reality dominates your experi-ence of love; indeed, actually creates it. For not only do you see yourself receiving love which is conditional, you also watch yourself giving it in the same way. And even while you withhold60 and retreat and set your conditions, a part of you knows this is not what love really is. Still, you seem powerless to change the way you dispense61 it. You’ve learned the hard way, you tell yourself, and you’ll be damned if you’re going to leave yourself vulnerable again. Yet the truth is, you’ll be damned if you don’t.
[By your own (mistaken) thoughts about love do you damn yourself never to experience it purely62. So, too, do you damn yourself never to know Me as I really am. Until you do. For you shall not be able to deny Me forever, and the moment will come for our Reconciliation63.]
Every action taken by human beings is based in love or fear, not simply those dealing64 with relationships. Decisions affecting business, industry, politics, relig-ion, the education of your young, the social agenda of your nations, the economic goals of your society, choices involving war, peace, attack, defense, aggres-sion, submission65; determinations to covet66 or give away, to save or to share, to unite or to divide—every single free choice you ever undertake arises out of one of the only two possible thoughts there are: a thought of love or a thought of fear.
Fear is the energy which contracts, closes down, draws in, runs, hides, hoards67, harms.
Love is the energy which expands, opens up, sends out, stays, reveals, shares, heals.
Fear wraps our bodies in clothing, love allows us to stand naked. Fear clings to and clutches all that we have, love gives all that we have away. Fear holds close, love holds dear. Fear grasps, love lets go. Fear rankles68, love soothes69. Fear attacks, love amends70.
Every’ human thought, word, or deed is based in one emotion or the other. You have no choice about this, because there is nothing else from which to choose. But you have free choice about which of these to select.
You make it sound so easy, and yet in the moment of decision fear wins more often than not. Why is that?
You have been taught to live in fear. You have been told about the survival of the fittest and the victory of the strongest and the success of the cleverest. Precious little is said about the glory of the most loving. And so you strive to be the fittest, the strongest, the clever-est—in one way or another—and if you see yourself as something less than this in any situation, you fear loss, for you have been told that to be less is to lose.
And so of course you choose the action fear spon-sors, for that is what you have been taught. Yet I teach you this: when you choose the action love sponsors, then will you do more than survive, then will you do more than win, then will you do more than succeed. Then will you experience the full glory of Who You Really Are, and who you can be.
To do this you must turn aside the teachings of your well-meaning, but misinformed, worldly tutors, and hear the teachings of those whose wisdom comes from another source.
There are many such teachers among you, as always there have been, for I will not leave you without those who would show you, teach you, guide you, and remind you of these truths.
Yet the greatest reminder71 is not anyone outside you, but the voice within you. This is the first tool that I use, because it is the most accessible.
The voice within is the loudest voice with which I speak, because it is the closest to you. It is the voice which tells you whether everything else is true or false, right or wrong, good or bad as you have defined it. It is the radar72 that sets the course, steers73 the ship, guides the journey if you but let it.
It is the voice which tells you right now whether the very words you are reading are words of love or words of fear. By this measure can you determine whether they are words to heed24 or words to ignore.
You said that when I always choose the action that love sponsors, then I will experience the full glory of who I am and who I can be. Will you expand on this please?
There is only one purpose for all of life, and that is for you and all that lives to experience fullest glory.
Everything else you say, think, or do is attendant to that function. There is nothing else for your soul to do, and nothing else your soul wants to do.
The wonder of this purpose is that it is never-ending. An ending is a limitation, and God’s purpose is without such a boundary. Should there come a moment in which you experience yourself in your fullest glory, you will in that instant imagine an ever greater glory to fulfill74. The more you are, the more you can become, and the more you can become, the more you can yet be.
The deepest secret is that life is not a process of discovery, but a process of creation.
You are not discovering yourself, but creating your-self anew. Seek, therefore, not to find out Who You Are, seek to determine Who You Want to Be.
There are those who say that life is a school, that we are here to learn specific lessons, that once we “graduate” we can go on to larger pursuits, no longer shackled75 by the body. Is this correct?
It is another part of your mythology, based on human experience.
Life is not a school?
No.
We are not here to learn lessons?
No.
Then why are we here?
To remember, and re-create, Who You Are.
I have told you, over and over again. You do not believe Me. Yet that is well as it should be. For truly, if you do not create yourself as Who You Are, that you cannot be.
Okay, You’ve lost me. Let’s go back to this school bit. I’ve heard teacher after teacher tell us that life is a school. I’m frankly76 shocked to hear You deny that.
School is a place you go if there is something you do not know that you want to know. It is not a place you go if you already know a thing and simply want to experience your knowingness.
Life (as you call it) is an opportunity for you to know experientially what you already know conceptually. You need learn nothing to do this. You need merely remem-ber what you already know, and act on it.
I’m not sure I understand.
Let’s start here. The soul—your soul—knows all there is to know all the time. There’s nothing hidden to it, nothing unknown. Yet knowing is not enough. The soul seeks to experience.
You can know yourself to be generous, but unless you do something which displays generosity77, you have nothing but a concept. You can know yourself to be kind, but unless you do someone a kindness, you have nothing but an idea about yourself.
It is your soul’s only desire to turn its grandest concept about itself into its greatest experience. Until concept becomes experience, all there is is speculation78. I have been speculating about Myself for a long time. Longer than you and I could collectively remember. Longer than the age of this universe times the age of the universe. You see, then, how young is—how new is—My experience of Myself!
You’ve lost me again. Your experience of Yourself?
Yes. Let me explain it to you this way:
In the beginning, that which Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. Yet All That Is could not know itself—because All That Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. And so, All That Is.. .was not. For in the absence of something else, All That Is, is not.
This is the great Is/Not Is to which mystics have referred from the beginning of time.
Now All That Is knew it was all there was—but this was not enough, for it could only know its utter mag-nificence conceptually, not experientially. Yet the ex-perience of itself is that for which it longed, for it wanted to know what it felt like to be so magnificent. Still, this was impossible, because the very term “mag-nificent” is a relative term. All That Is could not know what it felt like to be magnificent unless that which is not showed up. In the absence of that which is not, that which IS, is not.
Do you understand this?
I think so. Keep going.
Al right.
The one thing that All That Is knew is that there was nothing else. And so It could, and would, never know Itself from a reference point outside of Itself. Such a point did not exist. Only one reference point existed, and that was the single place within. The “Is-Not Is.” The Am-Not Am.
Still, the All of Everything chose to know Itself exper-ientially.
This energy—this pure, unseen, unheard, unob-served, and therefore unknown-by-anyone-else en-ergy—chose to experience Itself as the utter magnificence It was. In order to do this, It realized It would have to use a reference point within.
It reasoned, quite correctly, that any portion of Itself would necessarily have to be less than the whole, and that if It thus simply divided Itself into portions, each portion, being less than the whole, could look back on the rest of Itself and see magnificence.
And so All That Is divided Itself—becoming, in one glorious moment, that which is this, and that which is that. For the first time, this and that existed, quite apart from each other. And still, both existed simultaneously79. As did all that was neither.
Thus, three elements suddenly existed: that which is here. That which is there. And that which is neither here nor there—but which must exist for here and there to exist.
It is the nothing which holds the everything. It is the non-space which holds the space. It is the all which holds the parts.
Can you understand this?
Are you following this?
I think I am, actually. Believe it or not, you have used such a clear illustration that I think I’m actually understanding this.
I’m going to go further. Now this nothing which holds the everything is what some people call God. Yet that is not accurate, either, for it suggests that there is something God is not—namely, everything that is not “nothing.” But I am All Things—seen and unseen—so this description of Me as the Great Un-seen—the No-Thing, or the Space Between, an essen-tially Eastern mystical definition of God, is no more accurate than the essentially80 Western practical descrip-tion of God as all that is seen. Those who believe that God is All That Is and All That Is Not, are those whose understanding is correct.
Now in creating that which is “here” and that which is “there,” God made it possible for God to know Itself. In the moment of this great explosion from within, God created relativity—the greatest gift God ever gave to Itself. Thus, relationship is the greatest gift God ever gave to you, a point to be discussed in detail later.
From the No-Thing thus sprang the Everything—a spiritual event entirely81 consistent, incidentally, with what your scientists call The Big Bang theory.
As the elements of all raced forth82, time was created, for a thing was first here, then it was there—and the period it took to get from here to there was measurable.
just as the parts of Itself which are seen began to define themselves, “relative” to each other, so, too, did the parts which are unseen.
God knew that for love to exist—and to know itself as pure love—its exact opposite had to exist as well. So God voluntarily created the great polar-ity—the absolute opposite of love—everything that love is not—what is now called fear. In the moment fear existed, love could exist as a thing that could be experienced.
It is this creation of duality between love and its opposite which humans refer to in their various my-thologies as the birth of evil, the fall of Adam, the rebellion of Satan, and so forth.
Just as you have chosen to personify pure love as the character you call God, so have you chosen to personify abject83 fear as the character you call the devil.
Some on Earth have established rather elaborate mythologies84 around this event, complete with scenarios85 of battles and war, angelic soldiers and devilish warriors86, the forces of good and evil, of light and dark.
This mythology has been mankind’s early attempt to understand, and tell others in a way they could understand, a cosmic occurrence of which the human soul is deeply aware, but of which the mind can barely conceive.
In rendering88 the universe as a divided version of Itself, God produced, from pure energy, all that now exists—both seen and unseen.
In other words, not only was the physical universe thus created, but the metaphysical universe as well. The part of God which forms the second half of the Am/Not Am equation also exploded into an infinite number of units smaller than the whole. These energy units you would call spirits.
In some of your religious mythologies it is stated that “God the Father” had many spirit children. This parallel to the human experiences of life multiplying itself seems to be the only way the masses could be made to hold in reality the idea of the sudden appearance—the sudden existence—of countless89 spirits in the “Kingdom of Heaven.
In this instance, your mythical90 tales and stories are not so far from ultimate reality—for the endless spirits comprising the totality of Me are, in a cosmic sense, My offspring.
My divine purpose in dividing Me was to create sufficient parts of Me so that I could know Myself experientially. There is only one way for the Creator to know Itself experientially as the Creator, and that is to create. And so I gave to each of the countless parts of Me (to all of My spirit children) the same power to create which I have as the whole.
This is what your religions mean when they say that you were created in the “image and likeness of God.” This doesn’t mean, as some have suggested, that our physical bodies look alike (although God can adopt whatever physical form God chooses for a particular purpose). It does mean that our essence is the same. We are composed of the same stuff. We ARE the “same stuff”! With all the same properties and abilities—in-cluding the ability to create physical reality out of thin air.
My purpose in creating you, My spiritual offspring, was for Me to know Myself as God. I have no way to do that save through you. Thus it can be said (and has been, many times) that My purpose for you is that you should know yourself as Me.
This seems so amazingly simple, yet it becomes very complex—because there is only one way for you to know yourself as Me, and that is for you first to know yourself as not Me.
Now try to follow this—fight to keep up—because this gets very subtle here. Are you ready?
I think so.
Good. Remember, you’ve asked for this explana-tion. You’ve waited for it for years. You’ve asked for it in layman’s terms, nottheological doctrines92 or scientific theories.
Yes—I know what I’ve asked.
And having asked, so shall you receive.
Now, to keep things simple, I’m going to use your children of God mythological93 model as a basis for discussion, because it is a model with which you are familiar—and in many ways it is not that far off.
So let’s go back to how this process of self-knowing must work.
There is one way I could have caused all of My spiritual children to know themselves as parts of Me—and that was simply to tell them. This I did. But you see, it was not enough for Spirit to simply know Itself as God, or part of God, or children of God, or inheritors of the kingdom (or whatever mythology you want to use).
As I’ve already explained, knowing something, and experiencing it, are two different things. Spirit longed to know Itself experientially (just as I did!). Conceptual awareness94 was not enough for you. So I devised a plan. It is the most extraordinary idea in all the universe—and the most spectacular collaboration95. I say collaboration because all of you are in it with Me.
Under the plan, you as pure spirit would enter the physical universe just created. This is because physical-ity is the only way to know experientially what you know conceptually. It is, in fact, the reason I created the physical cosmos96 to begin with—and the system of relativity which governs it, and all creation.
Once in the physical universe, you, My spirit chil-dren, could experience what you know of your-self—but first, you had to come to know the opposite. To explain this simplistically, you cannot know yourself as tall unless and until you become aware of short. You cannot experience the part of yourself that you call fat unless you also come to know thin.
Taken to ultimate logic91, you cannot experience yourself as what you are until you’ve encountered what you are not. This is the purpose of the theory of relativ-ity, and all physical life. It is by that which you are not that you yourself are defined.
Now in the case of the ultimate knowing—in the case of knowing yourself as the Creator—you cannot experience your Self as creator unless and until you create. And you cannot create yourself until you Un-create yourself. In a sense, you have to first “not be” in order to be. Do you follow?
I think...
Stay with it.
Of course, there is no way for you to not be who and what you are-you simply are that (pure, creative spirit), have been always, and always will be. So, you did the next best thing. You caused yourself to forget Who You Really Are.
Upon entering the physical universe, you relin-quished your remembrance of yourself. This allows you to choose to be Who You Are, rather than simply wake up in the castle, so to speak.
It is in the act of choosing to be, rather than simply being told that you are, a part of God that you experi-ence yourself as being at total choice, which is what, by definition, God is. Yet how can you have a choice about something over which there is no choice? You cannot not be My offspring no matter how hard you try—but you can forget.
You are, have always been, and will always be, a divine part of the divine whole, a member of the body. That is why the act of rejoining the whole, of returning to God, is called remembrance. You actually choose to re-member Who You Really Are, or to join together with the various parts of you to experience the all of you—which is to say, the All of Me.
Your job on Earth, therefore, is not to learn (because you already know), but to re-member Who You Are. And to re-member who everyone else is. That is why a big part of your job is to remind others (that is, to re-mind them), so that they can re-member also.
All the wonderful spiritual teachers have been doing just that. It is your sole purpose. That is to say, your soul purpose.
My God, this is so simple—and so. . .symmetrical. I mean, it all fits in! It all suddenly fits! I see, now, a picture I have never quite put together before.
Good. That is good. That is the purpose of this dialogue. You have asked Me for answers. I have prom-ised I would give them to you.
You will make of this dialogue a book, and you will render My words accessible to many people. It is part of your work. Now, you have many questions, many inquiries97 to make about life. We have here placed the foundation. We have laid the groundwork for other understandings. Let us go to these other questions. And do not worry. If there is something about what we’ve just gone through you do not thoroughly98 understand, it will all be clear to you soon enough.
There is so much I want to ask. There are so many questions.
I suppose I should start with the big ones, the obvious ones. Like, why is the world in the shape it’s in?
Of all the questions man has asked of God, this is the one asked most often. From the beginning of time man has asked it. From the first moment to this you have wanted to know, why must it be like this?
The classic posing of the question is usually some-thing like: If God is all-perfect and all-loving, why would God create pestilence99 and famine, war and disease, earthquakes and tornados100 and hurricanes and all man-ner of natural disaster, deep personal disappointment, and worldwide calamity101?
The answer to this question lies in the deeper mys-tery of the universe and the highest meaning of life.
I do not show My goodness by creating only what you call perfection all around you. I do not demonstrate My love by not allowing you to demonstrate yours.
As I have already explained, you cannot demon-strate love until you can demonstrate not loving. A thing cannot exist without its opposite, except in the world of the absolute. Yet the realm of the absolute was not sufficient for either you or Me. I existed there, in the always, and it is from where you, too, have come.
In the absolute there is no experience, only knowing.
Knowing is a divine state, yet the grandest joy is in being.
Being is achieved only after experience. The evolution
is this: knowing, experiencing, being. This is the Holy
Trinity—the Triune that is God.
God the Father is knowing—the parent of all under-standings, the begetter102 of all experience, for you cannot experience that which you do not know.
God the Son is experiencing—the embodiment, the
acting103 out, of all that the Father knows of Itself, for you cannot be that which you have not experienced.
God the Holy Spirit is being—the disembodiment of all that the Son has experienced of Itself; the simple, exquisite104 is-ness possible only through the memory of the knowing and experiencing.
This simple being is bliss105. It is God-state, after know-ing and experiencing Itself. It is that for which God yearned106 in the beginning.
Of course, you are well past the point where you must have it explained to you that the father-son de-scriptions of God have nothing to do with gender107. I use here the picturesque108 speech of your most recent scrip-tures. Much earlier holy writings placed this metaphor109 in a mother-daughter context. Neither is correct. Your mind can best hold the relationship as: parent-offspring. Or: that-which-gives-rise-to, and that-which-is-risen.
Adding the third part of the Trinity produces this
relationship:
That which gives rise to / That which is risen / That which is.
This Triune Reality is God’s signature. It is the divine pattern. The three-in-one is everywhere found in the realms of the sublime110. You cannot escape it in matters dealing with time and space, God and consciousness, or any of the subtle relationships. On the other hand, you will not find the Triune Truth in any of life’s gross relationships.
The Triune Truth is recognized in life’s subtle rela-tionships by everyone dealing with such relationships.
Some of your religionists have described the Triune
Truth as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Some of your psychiatrists111 use the terms superconscious, conscious and subconscious112. Some of your spiritualists say mind, body, and spirit. Some of your scientists see energy, matter, ether. Some of your philosophers say a thing is not true for you until it is true in thought, word, and deed. When discussing time, you speak of three times only: past, present, future. Similarly, there are three moments in your perception—before, now, and after. In terms of spatial113 relationships, whether considering the points in the universe, or various points in your own room, you recognize here, there, and the space in between.
In matters of gross relationships, you recognize no in—between.” That is because gross relationships are always dyads, whereas relationships of the higher realm are invariably triads. Hence, there is left-right, up-down, big-small, fast-slow, hot-cold, and the greatest dyad ever created: male-female. There are no in-bet-weens in these dyads. A thing is either one thing or the other, or some greater or lesser114 version in relationship to one of these polarities.
Within the realm of gross relationships, nothing conceptualized can exist without a conceptualization of its opposite. Most of your day-to-day experience is foundationed in this reality.
Within the realm of sublime relationships nothing which exists has an opposite. All Is One, and everything progresses from one to the other in a never-ending circle.
Time is such a sublime realm, in which what you call past, present, and future exist inter-relationally. That is, they are not opposites, but rather parts of the same whole; progressions of the same idea; cycles of the same energy; aspects of the same immutable115 Truth. If you conclude from this that past, present, and future exist at one and the same “time,” you are right. (Yet now is not the moment to discuss that. We can get into this in much greater detail when we explore the whole concept of time—which we will do later.)
The world is the way it is because it could not be any other way and still exist in the gross realm of physicality. Earthquakes and hurricanes, floods and tornados, and events that you call natural disasters are but movements of the elements from one polarity to the other. The whole birth-death cycle is part of this move-ment. These are the rhythms of life, and everything in gross reality is subject to them, because life itself is a rhythm. It is a wave, a vibration116, a pulsation117 at the very heart of the All That Is.
Illness and disease are opposites of health and well-ness, and are made manifest in your reality at your behest. You cannot be ill without at some level causing yourself to be, and you can be well again in a moment by simply deciding to be. Deep personal disappoint-ments are responses which are chosen, and worldwide calamities118 are the result of worldwide consciousness.
Your question infers that I choose these events, that it is My will and desire they should occur. Yet I do not will these things into being, I merely observe you doing so. And I do nothing to stop them, because to do so would be to thwart26 your will. That, in turn, would deprive you of the God experience, which is the expe-rience you and I have chosen together.
Do not condemn3, therefore, all that you would call bad in the world. Rather, ask yourself, what about this have you judged bad, and what, if anything, you wish to do to change it.
Inquire within, rather than without, asking: “What part of my Self do I wish to experience now in the face of this calamity? What aspect of being do I choose to call forth?” For all of life exists as a tool of your own creation, and all of its events merely present themselves as opportunities for you to decide, and be, Who You Are.
This is true for every soul, and so you see there are no victims in the universe, only creators. The Masters who have walked this planet all knew this. That is why, no matter which Master you might name, none imag-ined themselves to be victimized—though many were truly crucified.
Each soul is a Master—though some do not remem-ber their origins or their heritages. Yet each creates the situation and the circumstance for its own highest pur-pose and its own quickest remembering—in each mo-ment called now.
Judge not, then, the karmic path walked by another. Envy not success, nor pity failure, for you know not what is success or failure in the soul’s reckoning. Call not a thing calamity, nor joyous119 event, until you decide, or witness, how it is used. For is a death a calamity if it saves the lives of thousands? And is a life a joyous event if it has caused nothing but grief? Yet even this you should not judge, but keep always your own counsel, and allow others theirs.
This does not mean ignore a call for help, nor the urging of your own soul to work toward the change of some circumstance or condition. It does mean avoiding labels and judgment120 while you do whatever you do. For each circumstance is a gift, and in each experience is hidden a treasure.
There once was a soul who knew itself to be the light. This was a new soul, and so, anxious for experi-ence. “I am the light,” it said. “I am the light.” Yet all the knowing of it and all the saying of it could not substitute for the experience of it. And in the realm from which this soul emerged, there was nothing but the light. Every soul was grand, every soul was magnificent, and every soul shone with the brilliance121 of My awesome122 light. And so the little soul in question was as a candle in the sun. In the midst of the grandest light—of which it was a part—it could not see itself, nor experience itself as Who and What it Really Is.
Now it came to pass that this soul yearned and yearned to know itself. And so great was its yearning123 that I one day said, “Do you know, Little One, what you must do to satisfy this yearning of yours?”
“Oh, what, God? What? I’ll do anything!” The little soul said.
“You must separate yourself from the rest of us,” I answered, “and then you must call upon yourself the darkness.
“What is the darkness, o Holy One?” the little soul asked.
“That which you are not,” I replied, and the soul understood.
And so this the soul did, removing itself from the All, yea, going even unto another realm. And in this realm the soul had the power to call into its experience all sorts of darkness. And this it did.
Yet in the midst of all the darkness did it cry out, “Father, Father, why hast Thou forsaken124 me?” Even as have you in your blackest times. Yet I have never forsaken you, but stand by you always, ready to remind you of Who You Really Are; ready, always ready, to call you home.
Therefore, be a light unto the darkness, and curse it not.
And forget not Who You Are in the moment of your encirclement by that which you are not. But do you praise to the creation, even as you seek to change it.
And know that what you do in the time of your greatest trial can be your greatest triumph. For the experience you create is a statement of Who You Are-and Who You Want to Be.
I have told you this story—the parable125 of the little soul and the sun—so that you might better understand why the world is the way it is—and how it can change in an instant the moment everyone remembers the divine truth of their highest reality.
Now there are those who say that life is a school, and that these things which you observe and experi-ence in your life are for your learning. I have addressed this before, and I tell you again:
You came into this life with nothing to learn—you have only to demonstrate what you already know. In the demonstration126 of it will you function it out, and create yourself anew, through your experience. Thus do you justify127 life, and give it purpose. Thus do you render it holy.
Are you saying that all the bad things that happen to us are things of our own choosing? Do you mean that even the world’s calamities and disasters are, at some level, created by us so that we can “experience the opposite of Who We Are”? And, if so, isn’t there some less painful way—less painful to ourselves and others—to create opportunities for us to experience ourselves?
You’ve asked several questions, and they are all good ones. Let’s take them one at a time.
No, not all the things which you call bad which happen to you are of your own choosing. Not in the conscious sense—which you mean. They are all of your own creation.
You are always in the process of creating. Every moment. Every minute. Every day. How you can create we’ll go into later. For now, just take my word for it—you are a big creation machine, and you are turning out a new manifestation128 literally129 as fast as you can think.
Events, occurrences, happenings, conditions, cir-cumstances—all are created out of consciousness. In-dividual consciousness is powerful enough. You can imagine what kind of creative energy is unleashed130 whenever two or more are gathered in My name. And mass consciousness? Why, that is so powerful it can create events and circumstances of worldwide import and planetary consequences.
It would not be accurate to say—not in the way you mean it—that you are choosing these consequences. You are not choosing them anymore than I am choosing them. Like Me, you are observing them. And deciding Who You Are with regard to them.
Yet there are no victims in the world, and no villains131. And neither are you a victim of the choices of others.
At some level you have all created that which you say you detest—and, having created it, you have chosen it.
This is an advanced level of thinking, and it is one which all Masters reach sooner or later. For it is only when they can accept responsibility for all of it that they can achieve the power to change part of it.
So long as you entertain the notion that there is something or someone else out there “doing it” to you, you disempower yourself to do anything about it. Only when you say “I did this” can you find the power to change it.
It is much easier to change what you are doing than to change what another is doing.
The first step in changing anything is to know and accept that you have chosen it to be what it is. If you can’t accept this on a personal level, agree to it through your understanding that We are all One. Seek then to create change not because a thing is wrong, but because it no longer makes an accurate statement of Who You Are.
There is only one reason to do anything: as a state-ment to the universe of Who You Are.
Used in this way, life becomes Self creative. You use life to create your Self as Who You Are, and Who You’ve Always Wanted to Be. There is also only one reason to un-do anything: because it is no longer a statement of Who You Want to Be. It does not reflect you. It does not represent you. (That is, it does not re-present you. .
If you wish to be accurately132 re-presented, you must work to change anything in your life which does not fit into the picture of you that you wish to project into eternity133.
In the largest sense, all the “bad” things that happen are of your choosing. The mistake is not in choosing them, but in calling them bad. For in calling them bad, you call your Self bad, since you created them.
This label you cannot accept, so rather than label your Self bad, you disown your own creations. It is this intellectual and spiritual dishonesty which lets you accept a world in which conditions are as they are. If you had to accept—or even felt a deep inner sense of—per-sonal responsibility for the world, it would be a far different place. This would certainly be true if everyone felt responsible. That this is so patently obvious is what makes it so utterly134 painful, and so poignantly135 ironic136.
The world’s natural calamities and disasters—its tornados and hurricanes, volcanoes and floods—its physical turmoils—are not created by you specifically. What is created by you is the degree to which these events touch your life.
Events occur in the universe which no stretch of the imagination could claim you instigated137 or created.
These events are created by the combined con-sciousness of man. All of the world, co-creating to-gether, produces these experiences. What each of you do, individually, is move through them, deciding what, if anything, they mean to you, and Who and What You Are in relationship to them.
Thus, you create collectively, and individually, the life and times you are experiencing, for the soul purpose of evolving.
You’ve asked if there is a less painful way to undergo this process—and the answer is yes—yet nothing in your outward experience will have changed. The way to reduce the pain which you associate with earthly experiences and events—both yours and those of oth-ers—is to change the way you behold138 them.
You cannot change the outer event (for that has been created by the lot of you, and you are not grown enough in your consciousness to alter individually that which has been created collectively), so you must change the inner experience. This is the road to mastery in living.
Nothing is painful in and of itself. Pain is a result of wrong thought. It is an error in thinking.
A Master can disappear the most grievous pain. In this way, the Master heals.
Pain results from a judgment you have made about a thing. Remove the judgment and the pain disappears.
Judgment is often based upon previous experience. Your idea about a thing derives139 from a prior idea about that thing. Your prior idea results from a still prior idea—and that idea from another, and so forth, like building blocks, until you get all the way back in the hall of mirrors to what I call first thought.
All thought is creative, and no thought is more powerful than original thought. That is why this is sometimes also called original sin.
Original sin is when your first thought about a thing is in error. That error is compounded many times over when you have a second or third thought about a thing. It is the job of the Holy Spirit to inspire you to new understandings, which can free you from your mis-takes.
Are you saying that I shouldn’t feel bad about the starving children of Africa, the violence and injustice140 in America, the earthquake that kills hundreds in Brazil?
There are no “shoulds” or “shouldn’ts” in God’s world. Do what you want to do. Do what reflects you, what re-presents you as a grander version of your Self. If you want to feel bad, feel bad.
But judge not, and neither condemn, for you know
not why a thing occurs, nor to what end.
And remember you this: that which you condemn
will condemn you, and that which you judge, you will
one day become.
Rather, seek to change those things—or support
others who are changing those things-which no longer
reflect your highest sense of Who You Are.
Yet, bless all—for all is the creation of God, through
life living, and that is the highest creation.
Could we just stop here for a moment and let me catch my breath? Did I hear you say there are no “shoulds” or “should nots” in God’s world?
That is correct.
How can that be? If there are none in Your world, where would they be?
Indeed—where...?
I repeat the question. Where else would “shoulds” and “should nots” appear, if not in Your world?
In your imagination.
But those who have taught me all about the rights and wrongs, the dos and don’ts, the shoulds and shouldn’ts, told me all those rules were laid down by You—by God.
Then those who taught you were wrong. I have never set down a “right” or “wrong,” a “do” or a “don’t.” To do so would be to strip you completely of your greatest gift—the opportunity to do as you please, and experience the results of that; the chance to create yourself anew in the image and likeness of Who You Really Are; the space to produce a reality of a higher and higher you, based on your grandest idea of what it is of which you are capable.
To say that something—a thought, a word, an ac-tion—is “wrong” would be as much as to tell you not to do it. To tell you not to do it would be to prohibit you. To prohibit you would be to restrict you. To restrict you would be to deny the reality of Who You Really Are, as well as the opportunity for you to create and experience that truth.
There are those who say that I have given you free will, yet these same people claim that if you do not obey Me, I will send you to hell. What kind of free will is that? Does this not make a mockery of God—to say nothing of any sort of true relationship between us?
Well, now we’re getting into another area I wanted to discuss, and that’s this whole business about heaven and hell. From what I’m gathering141 here, there is no such thing as hell.
There is hell, but it is not what you think, and you do not experience it for the reasons you have been given.
What is hell?
It is the experience of the worst possible outcome of your choices, decisions, and creations. It is the natural consequence of any thought which denies Me, or says no to Who You Are in relationship to Me.
It is the pain you suffer through wrong thinking. Yet even the term “wrongthinking” is a misnomer142, because there is no such thing as that which is wrong.
Hell is the opposite of joy. It is unfulfillment. It is knowing Who and What You Are, and failing to expe-rience that. It is being less. That is hell, and there is none greater for your soul.
But hell does not exist as this place you have fanta-sized, where you burn in some everlasting fire, or exist in some state of everlasting torment143. What purpose could I have in that?
Even if I did hold the extraordinarily144 unGodly thought that you did not “deserve” heaven, why would I have a need to seek some kind of revenge, or punishment, for your failing? Wouldn’t it be a simple matter for Me to just dispose of you? What vengeful part of Me would require that I subject you to eternal suffering of a type and at a level beyond description?
If you answer, the need for justice, would not a simple denial of communion with Me in heaven serve the ends of justice? Is the unending infliction145 of pain also required?
I tell you there is no such experience after death as you have constructed in your fear-based theologies. Yet there is an experience of the soul so unhappy, so incomplete, so less than whole, so separated from God’s greatest joy, that to your soul this would be hell. But I tell you I do not send you there, nor do I cause this experience to be visited upon you. You, yourself, create the experience, whenever and however you separate your Self from your own highest thought about you. You, yourself, create the experience, whenever you deny your Self; whenever you reject Who and What You Really Are.
Yet even this experience is never eternal. It cannot be, for it is not My plan that you shall be separated from Me forever and ever. Indeed, such a thing is an impos-sibility—for to achieve such an event, not only would you have to deny Who You Are—I would have to as well. This I will never do. And so long as one of us holds the truth about you, the truth about you shall ultimately prevail.
But if there is no hell, does that mean I can do what I want, act as I wish, commit any act, without fear of retribution?
Is it fear that you need in order to be, do, and have what is intrinsically right? Must you be threatened in order to “be good”? And what is “being good”? Who gets to have the final say about that? Who sets the guidelines? Who makes the rules?
I tell you this: You are your own rule-maker. You set the guidelines. And you decide how well you have done; how well you are doing. For you are the one who has decided Who and What You Really Are—and Who You Want to Be. And you are the only one who can assess how well you’re doing.
No one else will judge you ever, for why, and how, could God judge God’s own creation and call it bad? If I wanted you to be and do everything perfectly, I would have left you in the state of total perfection whence you came. The whole point of the process was for you to discover yourself, create your Self, as you truly are—and as you truly wish to be. Yet you could not be that unless you also had a choice to be something else.
Should I therefore punish you for making a choice that I Myself have laid before you? If I did not want you to make the second choice, why would I create other than the first?
This is a question you must ask yourself before you would assign Me the role of a condemning146 God.
The direct answer to your question is, yes, you may do as you wish without fear of retribution. It may serve you, however, to be aware of consequences.
Consequences are results. Natural outcomes. These are not at all the same as retributions, or punishments. Outcomes are simply that. They are what results from the natural application of natural laws. They are that which occurs, quite predictably, as a consequence of what has occurred.
All physical life functions in accordance with natural laws. Once you remember these laws, and apply them, you have mastered life at the physical level.
What seems like punishment to you-or what you would call evil, or bad luck—is nothing more than a natural law asserting itself.
Then if I were to know these laws, and obey them, I would never have a moment’s trouble again. Is that what you’re telling me?
You would never experience your Self as being in what you call “trouble.” You would not understand any life situation to be a problem. You would not encounter any circumstance with trepidation147. You would put an end to all worry, doubt, and fear. You would live as you fantasize Adam and Eve lived—not as disembodied spirits in the realm of the absolute, but as embodied148 spirits in the realm of the relative. Yet you would have all the freedom, all the joy, all the peace, and all the wisdom, understanding and power of the Spirit you are. You would be a fully149 realized being.
This is the goal of your soul. This is its purpose—to fully realize itself while in the body; to become the embodiment of all that it really is.
This is My plan for you. This is My ideal: that I should become realized through you. That thus, concept is turned into experience, that I might know my Self experientially.
The Laws of the Universe are laws that I laid down. They are perfect laws, creating perfect function of the physical.
Have you ever seen anything more perfect than a snowflake? Its intricacy, its design, its symmetry, its conformity150 to itself and originality151 from all else—all are a mystery. You wonder at the miracle of this awesome display of Nature. Yet if I can do this with a single snowflake, what think you I can do—have done—-with the universe?
Were you to see the symmetry of it, the perfection of its design—from the largest body to the smallest particle—you would not be able to hold the truth of it in your reality. Even now, as you get glimpses of it, you cannot yet imagine or understand its implica-tions. Yet you can know there are implications—far more complex and far more extraordinary than your present comprehension can embrace. Your Shake-speare said it wonderfully: There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt olin your philosophy.
Then how can I know these laws? How can I learn them?
It is not a question of learning, but of remembering. How can I remember them?
Begin by being still. Quiet the outer world, so that the inner world might bring you sight. This in-sight is what you seek, yet you cannot have it while you are so deeply concerned with your outer reality. Seek, there-fore, to go within as much as possible. And when you are not goingwithin, come from within as you deal with the outside world. Remember this axiom:
If you do not go within, you go without.
Put it in the first person as you repeat it, to make it more personal:
If I do not
go within
I
go without
You have been going without all your life. Yet you do not have to, and never did.
There is nothing you cannot be, there is nothing you cannot do. There is nothing you cannot have.
That sounds like a pie-in-the-sky promise.
What other kind of promise would you have God make? Would you believe Me if I promised you less?
For thousands of years people have disbelieved the promises of God for the most extraordinary rea-son: they were too good to be true. So you have chosen a lesser promise—a lesser love. For the high-est promise of God proceeds from the highest love. Yet you cannot conceive of a perfect love, and so a perfect promise is also inconceivable. As is a perfect person. Therefore you cannot believe even in your Self.
Failing to believe in any of this means failure to believe in God. For belief in God produces belief in God’s greatest gift—unconditional love—and God’s greatest promise—unlimited152 potential.
May I interrupt you here? I hate to interrupt God when He’s on a roll.. .but I’ve heard this talk of unlimited potential before, and it doesn’t square with the human experience. Forget the difficulties encountered by the average person—what about the challenges of those born with mental or physical limitations?
Is their unlimited?
potential
You have written so in your own Scripture—in many ways and in many places.
Give me one reference.
Look to see what you have written in Genesis, chapter 11, verse 6, of your Bible.
It says, “And the Lord said, ‘Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.’”
Yes. Now, can you trust that?
That does not answer the question of the feeble, the infirm, the handicapped, those who are limited.
Do you think they are limited, as you put it, not of their choice? Do you imagine that a human soul en-counters life challenges—whatever they may be—by accident? Is this your imagining?
Do you mean a soul chooses what kind of life it will experience ahead of time?
No, that would defeat the purpose of the encounter. The purpose is to create your experience—and thus, create your Self—in the glorious moment of Now. You do not, therefore, choose the life you will experience ahead of time.
You may, however, select the persons, places, and events—the conditions and circumstances, the chal-lenges and obstacles, the opportunities and op-tions—with which to create your experience. You may select the colors for your palette, the tools for your chest, the machinery153 for your shop. What you create with these is your business. That is the business of life.
Your potential is unlimited in all that you’ve chosen to do. Do not assume that a soul which has incarnated154 in a body which you call limited has not reached its full potential, for you do not know what that soul was trying to do. You do not understand its agenda. You are unclear as to its intent.
Therefore bless every person and condition, and give thanks. Thus you affirm the perfection of God’s creation—and show your faith in it. For nothing hap-pens by accident in God’s world, and there is no such thing as coincidence. Nor is the world buffeted155 by random156 choice, or something you call fate.
If a snowflake is utterly perfect in its design, do you not think the same could be said about something as magnificent as your life?
But even Jesus healed the sick. Why would he heal them if their condition was so “perfect”?
Jesus did not heal those he healed because he saw their condition as imperfect. He healed those he healed because he saw those souls asking for healing as part of their process. He saw the perfection of the process. He recognized and understood the soul’s intention. Had Jesus felt that all illness, mental or physical, represented imperfection, would he not have simply healed every-one on the planet, all at once? Do you doubt that he could do this?
No. I believe he could have.
Good. Then the mind begs to know: Why did he not do it? Why would the Christ choose to have some suffer, and others be healed? For that matter, why does God allow any suffering at anytime? This question has been asked before, and the answer remains157 he same. There is perfection in the process-and all life arises out of choice. It is not appropriate to interfere158 with choice, nor to question it. It is particularly inappropriate to condemn it.
What is appropriate is to observe it, and then to do whatever might be done to assist the soul in seeking and making a higher choice. Be watchful159, therefore, of the choices of others, but not judgmental. Know that their choice is perfect for them in this moment now—yet stand ready to assist them should the moment come when they seek a newer choice, a different choice—a higher choice.
Move into communion with the souls of others, and their purpose, their intention, will be clear to you. This is what Jesus did with those he healed—and with all those whose lives he touched. Jesus healed all those who came to him, or who sent others to him supplicat-ing for them. He did not perform a random healing. To have done so would have been to violate a sacred Law of the Universe:
Allow each soul to walk its path.
But does that mean we must not help anyone without being asked? Surely not, or we would never be able to help the starving children of India, or the tortured masses of Africa, or the poor, or the downtrodden anywhere. All humanitarian160 effort would be lost, all charity forbidden. Must we wait for an individual to cry out to us in desperation, or for a nation of people to plead for help, before we are allowed to do what is obviously right?
You see, the question answers itself. If a thing is obviously right, do it. But remember to exercise extreme judgment regarding what you call “right” and “wrong.”
A thing is only right or wrong because you say it is. A thing is not right or wrong intrinsically.
It isn’t?
“Rightness” or “wrongness” is not an intrinsic con-dition, it is a subjective161 judgment in a personal value system. By your subjective judgments162 do you create your Self—by your personal values do you determine and demonstrate Who You Are.
The world exists exactly as it is so that you may make these judgments. If the world existed in perfect condi-tion, your life process of Self creation would be termi-nated. It would end. A lawyer’s career would end tomorrow were there no more litigation. A doctor’s career would end tomorrow were there no more illness. A philosopher’s career would end tomorrow were there no more questions.
And God’s career would end tomorrow were there no more problems!
Precisely. You have put it perfectly. We, all of us, would be through creating were there nothing more to create. We, all of us, have a vested interest in keeping the game going. Much as we all say we would like to solve all the problems, we dare not solve all the prob-lems, or there will be nothing left for us to do.
Your industrial-military complex understands this very well. That is why it opposes mightily163 any attempt to install a war-no-more government—anywhere.
Your medical establishment understands this, too. That is why it staunchly opposes—it must, it has to for its own survival—any new miracle drug or cure—to say nothing of the possibility of miracles themselves.
Your religious community also holds this clarity. That is why it attacks uniformly any definition of God which does not include fear, judgment and retribution, and any definition of Self which does not include their own idea of the only path to God.
If I say to you, you are God—where does that leave religion? If I say to you, you are healed, where does that leave science, and medicine? If I say to you, you shall live in peace, where does that leave the peacemakers? If I say to you, the world is fixed—where does that leave the world?
What, now, of plumbers164?
The world is filled with essentially two kinds of people: those who give you things you want, and those who fix things. In a sense, even those who simply give you things you want—the butchers, the bakers165, the, candlestick makers—are also fixers. For to have a desire for something is often to have a need for it. That is why addicts166 are said to need a fix. Be careful, therefore, that desire not become addiction167.
Are you saying the world will always have problems? Are you saying that you actually want it that way?
I am saying that the world exists the way it ex-ists—just as a snowflake exists the way it exists—quite by design. You have created it that way—just as you have created your life exactly as it is.
I want what you want. The day you really want an end to hunger, there will be no more hunger. I have given you all the resources with which to do that. You have all the tools with which to make that choice. You have not made it. Not because you cannot make it. The world could end world hunger tomorrow. You choose not to make it.
You claim that there are good reasons that 40,000 people a day must die of hunger. There are no good reasons. Yet at a time when you say you can do nothing to stop 40,000 people a day from dying of hunger, you bring 50,000 people a day into your world to begin a new life. And this you call love. This you call God’s plan. It is a plan which totally lacks logic or reason, to say nothing of compassion168.
I am showing you in stark169 terms that the world exists the way it exists because you have chosen for it to. You are systematically170 destroying your own environment, then pointing to so-called natural disasters as evidence of God’s cruel hoax171, or Nature’s harsh ways. You have played the hoax on yourself, and it is your ways which are cruel.
Nothing, nothing is more gentle than Nature. And nothing, nothing has been more cruel to Nature than man. Yet you step aside from all involvement in this; deny all responsibility. It is not your fault, you say, and in this you are right. It is not a question of fault, it is a matter of choice.
You can choose to end the destruction of your rain forests tomorrow. You can choose to stop depleting172 the protective layer hovering173 over your planet. You can choose to discontinue the ongoing174 onslaught of your earth’s ingenious ecosystem175. You can seek to put the snowflake back together—or at least to halt its inexora-ble melting—but will you do it?— You can similarly end all war tomorrow. Simply.
Easily. All it takes—all it has ever taken—is for all of you to agree. Yet if you cannot all agree on something as basically simple as ending the killing176 of each other, how can you call upon the heavens with shaking fist to put your life in order?
I will do nothing for you that you will not do for your Self. That is the law and the prophets.
The world is in the condition it is in because of you, and the choices you have made-or failed to make.
(Not to decide is to decide.)
The Earth is in the shape it’s in because of you, and the choices you have made—or failed to make.
Your own life is the way it is because of you, and the choices you have made-or failed to make.
But I did not choose to get hit by that truck! I did not choose to get mugged by that robber, or raped177 by that maniac179. People could say that. There are people in the world who could say that.
You are all at root cause for the conditions which exist which create in the robber the desire, or the perceived need, to steal. You have all created the consciousness which makes rape178 possible. It is when you see in yourself that which caused the crime that you begin, at last, to heal the condition from which it sprang.
Feed your hungry, give dignity to your poor. Grant opportunity to your less fortunate. End the prejudice which keeps masses huddled180 and angry, with little promise of a better tomorrow. Put away your pointless taboos181 and restrictions182 upon sexual energy—rather, help others to truly understand its wonder, and to channel it properly. Do these things and you will go a long way toward ending robbery and rape forever.
As for the so-called “accident”—the truck coming around the bend, the brick falling from the sky—learn to greet each such incident as a small part of a larger mosaic183. You have come here to work out an individ-ual plan for your own salvation. Yet salvation does not mean saving yourself from the snares184 of the devil. There is no such thing as the devil, and hell does not exist. You are saving yourself from the oblivion of non-realization.
You cannot lose in this battle. You cannot fail. Thus it is not a battle at all, but simply a process. Yet if you do not know this, you will see it as a constant struggle. You may even believe in the struggle long enough to create a whole religion around it. This religion will teach that struggle is the point of it all. This is a false teaching. It is in not struggling that the process proceeds. It is in surrendering that the victory is won.
Accidents happen because they do. Certain ele-ments of the life process have come together in a particular way at a particular time, with particular re-sults—results which you choose to call unfortunate, for your own particular reasons. Yet they may not be unfortunate at all, given the agenda of your soul.
I tell you this: There is no coincidence, and nothing happens “by accident.” Each event and adventure is called to your Self by your Self in order that you might create and experience Who You Really Are. All true Masters know this. That is why mystic Masters remain unperturbed in the face of the worst experiences of life (as you would define them).
The great teachers of your Christian186 religion under-stand this. They know that Jesus was not perturbed185 by the crucifixion, but expected it. He could have walked away, but he did not. He could have stopped the process at any point. He had that power. Yet he did not. He allowed himself to be crucified in order that he might stand as man’s eternal salvation. Look, he said, at what I can do. Look at what is true.
And know that these things, and more, shall you also do. For have I not said, ye are gods? Yet you do not believe. If you cannot, then, believe in yourself, believe in me.
Such was Jesus’ compassion that he begged for a way—and created it—to so impact the world that all might come to heaven (Self realization)—if in no other way, then through him. For he defeated misery187, and death. And so might you.
The grandest teaching of Christ was not that you shall have everlasting life—but that you do; not that you shall have brotherhood188 in God, but that you do; not that you shall have whatever you request, but that you do.
All that is required is to know this. For you are the creator of your reality, and life can show up no other way for you than that way in which you think it will.
You think it into being. This is the first step in creation. God the Father is thought. Your thought is the parent which gives birth to all things.
This is one of the laws we are to remember.
Yes.
Can you tell me others?
I have told you others. I’ve told you them all, since the beginning of time. Over and over have I told you them. Teacher after teacher have! sent you. You do not listen to my teachers. You kill them.
But why? Why do we kill the holiest among us? We kill them or dishonor them, which is the same thing. Why?
Because they stand against every thought you have that would deny Me. And deny Me you must if you are to deny your Self.
Why would I want to deny You, or me?
Because you are afraid. And because My promises are too good to be true. Because you cannot accept the grandest Truth. And so you must reduce yourself to a spirituality which teaches fear and dependence189 and intol-erance, rather than love and power and acceptance.
You are filled with fear—and your biggest fear is that My biggest promise might be life’s biggest lie. And so you create the biggest fantasy you can to defend your-self against this: You claim that any promise which gives you the power, and guarantees you the love, of God must be the false promise of the devil. God would never make such a promise, you tell yourself, only the devil would—to tempt87 you into denying God’s true identity as the fearsome, judgmental, jealous, vengeful, and punishing entity190 of entities191.
Even though this description better fits the definition of a devil (if there were one), you have assigned devilish characteristics to God in order to convince yourself not to accept the God-like promises of your Creator, or the God-like qualities of the Self.
Such is the power of fear.
I am trying to let go of my fear. Will You tell me— again—more of the laws?
The First Law is that you can be, do, and have whatever you can imagine. The Second Law is that you attract what you fear.
Why is that?
Emotion is the power which attracts. That which you fear strongly, you will experience. An animal—which you consider a lower form of life (even though animals act with more integrity and greater consistency192 than humans)—knows immediately if you are afraid of it. Plants—which you consider an even lower form of life—respond to people who love them far better than to those who couldn’t care less.
None of this is by coincidence. There is no coinci-dence in the universe-only a grand design; an incred-ible “snowflake.”
Emotion is energy in motion. When you move energy, you create effect, If you move enough energy, you create matter. Matter is energy conglomerated. Moved around. Shoved together. If you manipulate energy long enough in a certain way, you get matter. Every Master understands this law. It is the alchemy of the universe. It is the secret of all life.
Thought is pure energy. Every thought you have, have ever had, and ever will have is creative. The energy of your thought never ever dies. Ever. It leaves your being and heads out into the universe, extending for-ever. A thought is forever.
All thoughts congeal193; all thoughts meet other thoughts, criss-crossing in an incredible maze194 of energy, forming an ever-changing pattern of unspeakable beauty and unbelievable complexity195.
Like energy attracts like energy—forming (to use simple words) “clumps” of energy of like kind. When enough similar “clumps” criss-cross each other—run into each other—they “stick to” each other (to use another simple term). It takes an incomprehensibly huge amount of similar energy “sticking together,” thusly, to form matter. But matter will form out of pure energy. In fact, that is the only way it can form. Once energy becomes matter, it remains matter for a very long time—unless its construction is disrupted by an oppos-ing, or dissimilar, form of energy. This dissimilar energy, acting upon matter, actually dismembers the matter, releasing the raw energy of which it was composed.
This is, in elementary terms, the theory behind your atomic bomb. Einstein came closer than any other human—before or since—to discovering, explaining, and functionalizing the creative secret of the universe.
You should now better understand how people of like mind can work together to create a favored reality. The phrase “Wherever two or more are gathered in My name” becomes much more meaningful.
Of course, when entire societies think a certain way, very often astonishing things happen—not all of them necessarily desirable. For instance, a society living in fear, very often—actually, inevitably—produces in form that which it fears most.
Similarly, large communities or congregations often find miracle-producing power in combined thinking (or what some people call common prayer).
And it must be made clear that even individuals—if their thought (prayer, hope, wish, dream, fear) is amaz-ingly strong—can, in and of themselves, produce such results. Jesus did this regularly. He understood how to manipulate energy and matter, howto rearrange it, how to redistribute it, how to utterly control it. Many Masters have known this. Many know it now.
You can know it. Right now.
This is the knowledge of good and evil of which
Adam and Eve partook. Until they understood this,
there could be no life as you know it. Adam and
Eve—the mythical names you have given to represent
First Man and First Woman—were the Father and
Mother of the human experience.
What has been described as the fall of Adam was actually his upliftment—the greatest single event in the history of humankind. For without it, the world of relativity would not exist. The act of Adam and Eve was not original sin, but, in truth, first blessing196. You should thank them from the bottom of your hearts—for in being the first to make a “wrong” choice, Adam and Eve produced the possibility of making any choice at all.
In your mythology you have made Eve the “bad” one here—the temptress who ate of the fruit, the knowledge of good and evil—and coyly invited Adam to join her. This mythological set-up has allowed you to make woman man’s “downfall” ever since, resulting in all manner of warped197 realities—not to mention dis-torted sexual views and confusions. (How can you feel so good about something so bad?)
What you most fear is what will most plague you. Fear will draw it to you like a magnet. All your holy scriptures—of every religious persuasion198 and tradition which you have created—contain the clear admoni-tion: fear not. Do you think this is by accident?
The Laws are very simple.
1. Thought is creative.
2. Fear attracts like energy.
3. Love is all there is.
Oops, you got me on that third one. How can love be all there is if fear attracts like energy?
Love is the ultimate reality. It is the only. The all. The feeling of love is your experience of God.
In highest Truth, love is all there is, all there was, and all there ever will be. When you move into the absolute, you move into love.
The realm of the relative was created in order that I might experience My Self. This has already been ex-plained to you. This does not make the realm of the relative real. It is a created reality you and I have devised and continue to devise—in order that we may know ourselves experientially.
Yet the creation can seem very real. Its purpose is to seem so real, we accept it as truly existing. In this way, God has contrived200 to create “something else” other than It self (though in strictest terms this is impossible, since God is—I AM—All That Is).
In creating “something else”—namely, the realm of the relative—I have produced an environment in which you may choose to be God, rather than simply be told that you are God; in which you may experience God-head as an act of creation, rather than a conceptualiza-tion; in which the little candle in the sun—the littlest soul-can know itself as the light.
Fear is the other end of love. It is the primal201 polarity. In creating the realm of the relative, I first created the opposite of My Self. Now, in the realm in which you live on the physical plane, there are only two places of being: fear and love. Thoughts rooted in fear will pro-duce one kind of manifestation on the physical plane. Thoughts rooted in love will produce another.
The Masters who have walked the planet are those who have discovered the secret of the relative world—and refused to acknowledge its reality. In short, Masters are those who have chosen only love. In every instance. In every moment. In every circumstance. Even as they were being killed, they loved their murderers. Even as they were being persecuted202, they loved their oppressors.
This is very difficult for you to understand, much less emulate203. Nevertheless, it is what every Master has ever done. It doesn’t matter what the philosophy, it doesn’t matter what the tradition, it doesn’t matter what the religion—it is what every Master has done.
This example and this lesson has been laid out so clearly for you. Time and time again, over and over has it been shown to you. Through all the ages and in every place. Through all your lifetimes and in every moment. The universe has used every contrivance to place this Truth before you. In song and story, in poetry and dance, in words and in motion—in pictures of motion, which you call motion pictures, and in collections of words, which you call books.
From the highest mountain it has been shouted, in the lowest place its whisper has been heard. Through the corridors of all human experience has this Truth been echoed: Love is the answer. Yet you have not listened.
Now come you to this book, asking God again what
God has told you countless times in countless ways. Yet
I will tell you again—here—in the context of this book.
Will you listen now? Will you truly hear?
What do you think brought you to this material? How does it come to pass that you are holding it in your hands? Do you think I know not what I am doing?
There are no coincidences in the universe.
I have heard the crying of your heart. I have seen the searching of your soul. I know how deeply you have desired the Truth. In pain have you called out for it, and in joy. Unendingly have you beseeched Me. Show Myself. Explain Myself. Reveal Myself.
I am doing so here, in terms so plain, you cannot misunderstand. In language so simple, you cannot be confused. In vocabulary so common, you cannot get lost in the verbiage204.
So go ahead now. Ask Me anything. Anything. I will contrive199 to bring you the answer. The whole universe will I use to do this. So be on the lookout205. This book is far from My only tool. You may ask a question, then put this book down. But watch. Listen. The words to the next song you hear. The information in the next article you read. The story line of the next movie you watch. The chance utterance17 of the next person you meet. Or the whisper of the next river the next ocean, the next breeze that caresses206 your ear—all these devices are Mine; all these avenues are open to Me. I will speak to you if you will listen. I will come to you if you will invite Me. I will show you then that I have always been there. All ways.
点击收听单词发音
1 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 passionate | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,激昂的,易动情的,易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 elude | |
v.躲避,困惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 scribbled | |
v.潦草的书写( scribble的过去式和过去分词 );乱画;草草地写;匆匆记下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 poised | |
a.摆好姿势不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 abruptly | |
adv.突然地,出其不意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 venting | |
消除; 泄去; 排去; 通风 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 scribbling | |
n.乱涂[写]胡[乱]写的文章[作品]v.潦草的书写( scribble的现在分词 );乱画;草草地写;匆匆记下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 transcribing | |
(用不同的录音手段)转录( transcribe的现在分词 ); 改编(乐曲)(以适应他种乐器或声部); 抄写; 用音标标出(声音) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 astounding | |
adj.使人震惊的vt.使震惊,使大吃一惊astound的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 relevance | |
n.中肯,适当,关联,相关性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 intrigued | |
adj.好奇的,被迷住了的v.搞阴谋诡计(intrigue的过去式);激起…的兴趣或好奇心;“intrigue”的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 constricted | |
adj.抑制的,约束的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 utterance | |
n.用言语表达,话语,言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 utterances | |
n.发声( utterance的名词复数 );说话方式;语调;言论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 symbolize | |
vt.作为...的象征,用符号代表 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 differentiation | |
n.区别,区分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 heed | |
v.注意,留意;n.注意,留心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 heeded | |
v.听某人的劝告,听从( heed的过去式和过去分词 );变平,使(某物)变平( flatten的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 thwart | |
v.阻挠,妨碍,反对;adj.横(断的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 thwarted | |
阻挠( thwart的过去式和过去分词 ); 使受挫折; 挫败; 横过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 coerce | |
v.强迫,压制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 interceding | |
v.斡旋,调解( intercede的现在分词 );说情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 beseeching | |
adj.恳求似的v.恳求,乞求(某事物)( beseech的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 authoritative | |
adj.有权威的,可相信的;命令式的;官方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 purveyor | |
n.承办商,伙食承办商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 almighty | |
adj.全能的,万能的;很大的,很强的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 supplication | |
n.恳求,祈愿,哀求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 supplicate | |
v.恳求;adv.祈求地,哀求地,恳求地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 whatsoever | |
adv.(用于否定句中以加强语气)任何;pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 fervent | |
adj.热的,热烈的,热情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 fervently | |
adv.热烈地,热情地,强烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 omnipotent | |
adj.全能的,万能的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 likeness | |
n.相像,相似(之处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 Buddha | |
n.佛;佛像;佛陀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 ecstasy | |
n.狂喜,心醉神怡,入迷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 derivatives | |
n.衍生性金融商品;派生物,引出物( derivative的名词复数 );导数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 conditional | |
adj.条件的,带有条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 wondrous | |
adj.令人惊奇的,奇妙的;adv.惊人地;异乎寻常地;令人惊叹地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 exuberance | |
n.丰富;繁荣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 criteria | |
n.标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 banishment | |
n.放逐,驱逐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 mythology | |
n.神话,神话学,神话集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 salvation | |
n.(尤指基督)救世,超度,拯救,解困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 withhold | |
v.拒绝,不给;使停止,阻挡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 dispense | |
vt.分配,分发;配(药),发(药);实施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 reconciliation | |
n.和解,和谐,一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 submission | |
n.服从,投降;温顺,谦虚;提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 covet | |
vt.垂涎;贪图(尤指属于他人的东西) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 hoards | |
n.(钱财、食物或其他珍贵物品的)储藏,积存( hoard的名词复数 )v.积蓄并储藏(某物)( hoard的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 rankles | |
v.(使)痛苦不已,(使)怨恨不已( rankle的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 soothes | |
v.安慰( soothe的第三人称单数 );抚慰;使舒服;减轻痛苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 amends | |
n. 赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 reminder | |
n.提醒物,纪念品;暗示,提示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 radar | |
n.雷达,无线电探测器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 steers | |
n.阉公牛,肉用公牛( steer的名词复数 )v.驾驶( steer的第三人称单数 );操纵;控制;引导 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 fulfill | |
vt.履行,实现,完成;满足,使满意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 shackled | |
给(某人)带上手铐或脚镣( shackle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 generosity | |
n.大度,慷慨,慷慨的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 speculation | |
n.思索,沉思;猜测;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 simultaneously | |
adv.同时发生地,同时进行地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 abject | |
adj.极可怜的,卑屈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 mythologies | |
神话学( mythology的名词复数 ); 神话(总称); 虚构的事实; 错误的观点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 warriors | |
武士,勇士,战士( warrior的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 tempt | |
vt.引诱,勾引,吸引,引起…的兴趣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 rendering | |
n.表现,描写 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 mythical | |
adj.神话的;虚构的;想像的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 mythological | |
adj.神话的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 awareness | |
n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 collaboration | |
n.合作,协作;勾结 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 cosmos | |
n.宇宙;秩序,和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 pestilence | |
n.瘟疫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 tornados | |
n.龙卷风,旋风( tornado的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 calamity | |
n.灾害,祸患,不幸事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 begetter | |
n.生产者,父 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 bliss | |
n.狂喜,福佑,天赐的福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 yearned | |
渴望,切盼,向往( yearn的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 picturesque | |
adj.美丽如画的,(语言)生动的,绘声绘色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 metaphor | |
n.隐喻,暗喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 psychiatrists | |
n.精神病专家,精神病医生( psychiatrist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 subconscious | |
n./adj.潜意识(的),下意识(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 spatial | |
adj.空间的,占据空间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 immutable | |
adj.不可改变的,永恒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 vibration | |
n.颤动,振动;摆动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 pulsation | |
n.脉搏,悸动,脉动;搏动性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 calamities | |
n.灾祸,灾难( calamity的名词复数 );不幸之事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 joyous | |
adj.充满快乐的;令人高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 brilliance | |
n.光辉,辉煌,壮丽,(卓越的)才华,才智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 awesome | |
adj.令人惊叹的,难得吓人的,很好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 yearning | |
a.渴望的;向往的;怀念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 Forsaken | |
adj. 被遗忘的, 被抛弃的 动词forsake的过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 parable | |
n.寓言,比喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 demonstration | |
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 manifestation | |
n.表现形式;表明;现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 unleashed | |
v.把(感情、力量等)释放出来,发泄( unleash的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 villains | |
n.恶棍( villain的名词复数 );罪犯;(小说、戏剧等中的)反面人物;淘气鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 poignantly | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 ironic | |
adj.讽刺的,有讽刺意味的,出乎意料的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 instigated | |
v.使(某事物)开始或发生,鼓动( instigate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 derives | |
v.得到( derive的第三人称单数 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 gathering | |
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 misnomer | |
n.误称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 torment | |
n.折磨;令人痛苦的东西(人);vt.折磨;纠缠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 extraordinarily | |
adv.格外地;极端地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 infliction | |
n.(强加于人身的)痛苦,刑罚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 trepidation | |
n.惊恐,惶恐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 incarnated | |
v.赋予(思想、精神等)以人的形体( incarnate的过去式和过去分词 );使人格化;体现;使具体化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 buffeted | |
反复敲打( buffet的过去式和过去分词 ); 连续猛击; 打来打去; 推来搡去 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 random | |
adj.随机的;任意的;n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 watchful | |
adj.注意的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 subjective | |
a.主观(上)的,个人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 judgments | |
判断( judgment的名词复数 ); 鉴定; 评价; 审判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 mightily | |
ad.强烈地;非常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 plumbers | |
n.管子工,水暖工( plumber的名词复数 );[美][口](防止泄密的)堵漏人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 bakers | |
n.面包师( baker的名词复数 );面包店;面包店店主;十三 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 addicts | |
有…瘾的人( addict的名词复数 ); 入迷的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 addiction | |
n.上瘾入迷,嗜好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 compassion | |
n.同情,怜悯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 stark | |
adj.荒凉的;严酷的;完全的;adv.完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 systematically | |
adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 hoax | |
v.欺骗,哄骗,愚弄;n.愚弄人,恶作剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 depleting | |
使大大的减少,使空虚( deplete的现在分词 ); 耗尽,使枯竭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 hovering | |
鸟( hover的现在分词 ); 靠近(某事物); (人)徘徊; 犹豫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 ecosystem | |
n.生态系统 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 raped | |
v.以暴力夺取,强夺( rape的过去式和过去分词 );强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 rape | |
n.抢夺,掠夺,强奸;vt.掠夺,抢夺,强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 maniac | |
n.精神癫狂的人;疯子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 huddled | |
挤在一起(huddle的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 taboos | |
禁忌( taboo的名词复数 ); 忌讳; 戒律; 禁忌的事物(或行为) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 mosaic | |
n./adj.镶嵌细工的,镶嵌工艺品的,嵌花式的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 snares | |
n.陷阱( snare的名词复数 );圈套;诱人遭受失败(丢脸、损失等)的东西;诱惑物v.用罗网捕捉,诱陷,陷害( snare的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 perturbed | |
adj.烦燥不安的v.使(某人)烦恼,不安( perturb的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 brotherhood | |
n.兄弟般的关系,手中情谊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 dependence | |
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 entity | |
n.实体,独立存在体,实际存在物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 entities | |
实体对像; 实体,独立存在体,实际存在物( entity的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 congeal | |
v.凝结,凝固 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 maze | |
n.迷宫,八阵图,混乱,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 complexity | |
n.复杂(性),复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 blessing | |
n.祈神赐福;祷告;祝福,祝愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 warped | |
adj.反常的;乖戾的;(变)弯曲的;变形的v.弄弯,变歪( warp的过去式和过去分词 );使(行为等)不合情理,使乖戾, | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 contrive | |
vt.谋划,策划;设法做到;设计,想出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 contrived | |
adj.不自然的,做作的;虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 primal | |
adj.原始的;最重要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 persecuted | |
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 emulate | |
v.努力赶上或超越,与…竞争;效仿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 verbiage | |
n.冗词;冗长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 lookout | |
n.注意,前途,瞭望台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 caresses | |
爱抚,抚摸( caress的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |