'The authorities were evidently of the same opinion. The inquiry¹ was not adjourned². It was held on the appointed day to satisfy the law, and it was well attended because of its human interest, no doubt. There was no incertitude⁴ as to facts -- as to the one material fact, I mean. How the Patna came by her hurt it was impossible to find out; the court did not expect to find out; and in the whole audience there was not a man who cared. Yet, as I've told you, all the sailors in the port attended, and the waterside business was fully⁵ represented. Whether they knew it or not, the interest that drew them there was purely⁶ psychological -- the expectation of some essential disclosure as to the strength, the power, the horror, of human emotions. Naturally nothing of the kind could be disclosed. The examination of the only man able and willing to face it was beating futilely⁸ round the well-known fact, and the play of questions upon it was as instructive as the tapping with a hammer on an iron box, were the object to find out what's inside. However, an official inquiry could not be any other thing. Its object was not the fundamental why, but the superficial how, of this affair.

'The young chap could have told them, and, though that very thing was the thing that interested the audience, the questions put to him necessarily led him away from what to me, for instance, would have been the only truth worth knowing. You can't expect the constituted authorities to inquire into the state of a man's soul -or is it only of his liver? Their business was to come down upon the consequences, and frankly⁹, a casual police magistrate¹⁰ and two nautical¹¹ assessors are not much good for anything else. I don't mean to imply these fellows were stupid. The magistrate was very patient. One of the assessors was a sailing-ship skipper with a reddish beard, and of a

分享到：