It had been settled that Parliament should meet on the Thursday in Easter week, and it was known to the world at large that Cabinet Councils were held on the Friday previous, on the Monday, and on the Tuesday; but nobody knew what took place at those meetings. Cabinet Councils are, of course, very secret. What kind of oath the members take not to divulge¹ any tittle of the proceedings² at these awful conferences, the general public does not know; but it is presumed that oaths are taken very solemn, and it is known that they are very binding³. Nevertheless, it is not an uncommon⁴ thing to hear openly at the clubs an account of what has been settled; and, as we all know, not a council is held as to which the editor of the People’s Banner does not inform its readers next day exactly what took place. But as to these three Cabinet Councils there was an increased mystery abroad. Statements, indeed, were made, very definite and circumstantial, but then they were various — and directly opposed one to another. According to the People’s Banner, Mr Daubeny had resolved, with that enduring courage which was his peculiar⁵ characteristic, that he would not be overcome by faction⁶, but would continue to exercise all the functions of Prime Minister until he had had an opportunity of learning whether his great measure had been opposed by the sense of the country, or only by the tactics of an angry and greedy party. Other journals declared that the Ministry⁷ as a whole had decided⁸ on resigning. But the clubs were in a state of agonising doubt. At the great stronghold of conservative policy in Pall⁹ Mall men were silent, embarrassed, and unhappy. The party was at heart divorced from its leaders — and a party without leaders is powerless. To these gentlemen there could be no triumph, whether Mr Daubeny went out or remained in office. They had been betrayed — but as a body were unable even to accuse the

分享到：