选择字号:【大】【中】【小】 | 关灯
护眼
|
关注小说网官方公众号(noveltingroom),原版名著免费领。
THE LIFE of nations is not contained in the life of a few men, since the connection between those few men and the nations has not been found. The theory that this connection is based on the delegation1 of the combined will of a people to its historical leaders is an hypothesis, not supported by the testimony2 of history.
The theory of the delegation of the combined will of the masses to historical personages may perhaps explain a great deal in the domain3 of the science of law, and is possibly essential for its purposes. But in its application to history, as soon as revolutions, wars, civil disturbances4 arise, as soon as history begins in fact—this theory explains nothing.
This theory appears irrefutable, just because the act of delegating the will of the people can never be verified, since it has never existed.
Whatever event might take place, and whoever might be taking the lead in such an event, the theory can always say that such a person took the lead in bringing about that event because the combined will was vested in him.
The answers given by this theory to historical questions are like the answers of a man who, watching the movements of a flock, should pay no attention to the varying quality of the pasturage in different parts of the field, nor to the actions of the shepherd, but should look for the causes of the flock taking this or that direction simply in the animal that happened to be foremost in it.
“The flock moves in this direction because the animal in front leads it, and the combined will of all the other animals is delegated to the leader of the flock.” Such is the answer given by the first class of historians, who suppose an unconditional5 delegation of will to the authority.
“If the animals leading the flock are changed for others, it is due to the fact that the combined will of all the beasts is transferred from one leader to another owing to the fact that the first leader did not follow the direction chosen by all the flock.” Such is the reply of those historians who assume that the combined will of the masses is vested in their rulers on conditions which they regard as unknown. (With this method of observation it very often happens that the observer, judging from the direction chosen by him, reckons as leaders those who, when the direction of the masses is changed, are not in front, but on one side, and even sometimes the hindmost.)

1
delegation
![]() |
|
n.代表团;派遣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
testimony
![]() |
|
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
domain
![]() |
|
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
disturbances
![]() |
|
n.骚乱( disturbance的名词复数 );打扰;困扰;障碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
unconditional
![]() |
|
adj.无条件的,无限制的,绝对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
attain
![]() |
|
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
monarchs
![]() |
|
君主,帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
phenomena
![]() |
|
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
accomplished
![]() |
|
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
intervention
![]() |
|
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
immediate
![]() |
|
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
dependence
![]() |
|
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
deity
![]() |
|
n.神,神性;被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
forth
![]() |
|
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
acting
![]() |
|
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
inevitable
![]() |
|
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|