The rays of the sun often play upon the small earth elevation5, and lend additional beauty to the green foliage6 of the trees, the bright color of the many flowers.
But verily, we are like the sunshine—superficial. It is the great fault of mankind to be satisfied with a film-like knowledge of things. To go deeper, to dive below the superstratum, would mean to meet, perhaps, with matters not at all pleasant; to become cognizant of facts never before dreamt of. Consequently, the majority of men is content to remain on the surface; content to know a little, but not all.
Thank God, there are happily individuals left who descend7 to the bottom of every question, scientific or social, and who daily enrich all departments of learning.
As regards the grave, let us first of all listen to him who has held generations of folk spellbound; let us bow reverently10 before the opinion of one of the masters among English novelists—Charles Dickens.
67
THE CREMATORIUM AT CREMONA.
(From Dr. Pini’s work.)
68It is he who tells us in measured words that the grave is naught11 but—
“Brave lodgings12 for one, brave lodgings for one,
A few feet of cold earth, when life is done;
A stone at the head, a stone at the feet,
A rich, juicy meal for the worms to eat;
Rank grass overhead, and damp clay around,
Brave lodgings for one, these, in holy ground!”
The late Prof. Samuel D. Gross, M.D., one of the greatest surgeons the world ever possessed13, called burial a horrible practice, and maintained that:—
“If people could see the human body after the process of decomposition14 sets in, which is as soon as the vital spark ceases to exist, they would not want to be buried; they would be in favor of cremation15. If they could go into a dissecting-room and see the horrid16 sights of the dissecting-table, they would not wish to be buried. Burying the human body, I think, is a horrible thing. If more was known about the human frame while undergoing decomposition, people would turn with horror from the custom of burying their dead. It takes a human body 50, 60, 80 years—yes, longer than that—to decay. Think of it! The remains18 of a friend lying under six feet of ground, or less, for that length of time, going through the slow stages of decay, and other bodies all this time being buried around these remains. Infants grow up, and pass into manhood or womanhood; grow old, and get near the door of death; and during all that time the body which was buried in their infancy19 lies a few feet under ground in this sickening state, undergoing the slow process of decay. Think of thousands of such bodies crowded into a few acres of ground, and then reflect that these 69graves, or many of them, in time fill with water, and that water percolates20 through the ground and mixes with the springs and rivers from which we drink.
“People turn with dread21 from the subject of cremation. Why, if they knew what physicians know,—what they have learned in the dissecting-room,—they would look upon burning the human body as a beautiful art in comparison with burying it. There is something eminently22 repulsive24 to me about the idea of lying a few feet under ground for a century, or perhaps two centuries, going through the process of decomposition. When I die, I want my body to be burned.
“Any unprejudiced mind needs but little time to reflect in forming a conclusion as to which is the better method of disposing of the body. Common sense and reason proclaim in favor of cremation. There is no reason for keeping up the burial custom, but many against it; some of the most practical of which are but too recently developed to need mention. There is nothing repulsive in the idea of cremation. People’s prejudice is the only opponent it has. If they could be awakened25 to a sense of the horror of crowding thousands of bodies under the ground, to pollute in many instances the air we breathe and the water we drink, their prejudice would be overcome; cremation would be taken for what it truly is—a beautiful method of disposing of the body. The friends of the departed can do as they please with the remains. Take the ashes of a wife or daughter and put them in an urn17; place it on your mantelpiece, or in as private a place as you please. Strew26 them on the ground if you like, and let them assist in bringing forth27 a blade of grass. This 70would be an advantage over the burial method, where human bodies only cumber28 the ground.”
This was said by a man who not only showed considerable ability as an operator, and writer on topics of medicine, but who also was honored by the famous universities of Cambridge and Oxford29, receiving from them academical titles never conferred except upon the most distinguished30.
We will take a spade (only metaphorically31, of course) and investigate the narrow pit which serves to hold all that is mortal of man after the spark of life has extinguished. Now we remove the plants, the clinging vines, the blooming flowrets. We throw the earth aside and finally lay bare a coffin32. A coffin? Something that must have been one in the remote past. A sickening odor greets us. We step back to draw a breath of pure air. At last we muster33 up sufficient courage to return to the grave. A touch of the spade causes the top-board of the box to fall to pieces, and there is revealed to the sight a spectacle that is horrible. The ground around the body has been moist and non-porous34; what has remained of the corpse35 is only a mass of foul36 flesh in a state of putrefaction37. Is there anything more disgusting than such a sight?
Shakespeare says in “As You Like It”:—
“And so, from hour to hour, we ripe and ripe,
And then, from hour to hour, we rot and rot;
And thereby38 hangs a tale.”
True! The tale that hangs thereby is illustrative of the carelessness and ignorance of man alike. The grave has been at all times a kind of box of Pandora, with this difference,—it did not require unclosing: unopened, the grave sent forth its children—pestilence39 71and death—to decimate the ranks of the population of the globe. But all calamities40 caused by burial have been endured by people with perfect indifference41, and it was not until modern times that any reforms were attempted at all. But in spite of these so-called reforms, the murder of the living by the dead has continued. The reforms I mentioned generally resulted in the removal of cemeteries42 to the suburbs of cities. In this way the evil effects of interment were deferred43 for some time, till the city enlarged, and the population closed in around the burial-grounds.
What is burial? For what purpose do we place the bodies of our dead in the earth? It is the beginning of a chemical process—a process which ends finally in the total dissolution of the corpse. The chemical constituents44 of our body are returned to nature. Burial and cremation are in a sense the same; in either case the body oxydates. The great distinction between the two lies in the fact, that the burning in the grave requires years for its completion, and is fraught45 with danger to the living, whilst in case of incineration the body is reduced to its primitive46 elements in the brief space of a few hours, and is unaccompanied by anything that may do harm.
Dr. A. B. Prescott, Professor of Chemistry in the University of Michigan, has determined47 what elements of the human body are destroyed or dissipated by cremation, and what remain in the ashes. In a letter to the Detroit Post he states:—
“Of the 70 chemical elements or ultimate simples, known to man, 15 are found in the human body. Of these, four—carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen—are derived48 from the air, and in combustion50, as in 72decay, they return to the air again. These four in their various compounds make up by far the greater part of the animal tissues. Of the remaining 11 chemical elements, six are metals,—potassium, sodium51, calcium52, magnesium53, iron, and manganese; and five are non-metals,—sulphur, phosphorus, chlorine, fluorine, and silicon54. When combustion of the tissues is completed, the six metals, in combination with the five non-metals last named, are left behind in the ash. These were drawn55 from the earth. There are about 19 chemical compounds in the ash so left, compounds such as phosphate of lime, carbonate of lime, sulphate of potash, chloride of sodium, etc. The greater number of the ultimate elements contained in the living body are left behind in the ash, but the proportional quantity made up by all these elements is, of course, very small. In the first place, about two-thirds of the tissues consist of water. The proportion of the ‘ash’ to the tissues varies from two per cent in muscle and seven-tenths per cent in blood, to 66 per cent in bone. The ‘ash’ left by combustion is very nearly the same, in kind and in quantity, as the ‘dust’ left after the final completion of decay.”
What is decomposition? How does it take place normally? Decomposition is the decay of an organic substance, which is completely destroyed through the influence of the atmospheric56 oxygen. Decomposition is facilitated by moisture. The organic mass undergoing such change assumes a different color and consistency57 and gives up carbonic acid, ammonia, and water; the same products originate in the rapid destruction of an organic substance by means of fire.
Only those parts of the body (the bones) that can 73best resist the influence of the air remain secure from decay a longer time; at last they also crumble58 into dust and mingle59 with the rest.
Wetness accelerates decay. When we hear the rain fall in the silent night, we are compelled to think, shuddering61, how the horrible process of destruction begins in the grave of some beloved one whom we have recently buried.
The same stench that assails62 our nostrils63 when we approach a corpse that has lain a long time above ground, meets us when we open a grave; the same poisonous gases are evolved under ground from a decaying corpus as upon the surface of the earth. It makes no difference whether the grave we explore be that of a prime minister, upon which a magnificent monument rears its costly64 shaft65 high into the air, or that of a common criminal who tried to enjoy existence by spending three-quarters of his lifetime in prison; the result remains the same: in each we find the disgusting and sickening evidence of slow destruction,—a formless, putrid66 mass of flesh, and sometimes numberless revelling67 worms.
The conditions under which decomposition can take place are a certain degree of moisture and a constant supply of air. When a corpse is embedded68 in a soil that is very wet, a curious change takes place. There is no decay, but instead a fatty metamorphosis, giving the body a waxy69 appearance and preserving its original form. The result of this transformation70 is called adipocere. The process by which the body is changed into this stearine-like mass is entitled saponification, and is not very well understood as yet by the scientists. 74Such preserved bodies were found in the burial-grounds at Paris, Brussels, London, and many other cities.
THE CREMATORIUM AT VARESE.
(From Dr. Pini’s work.)
75In 1874, the cemetery71 board of the burial-ground at Zuerich, Switzerland, discovered that the bodies interred72 in the graveyard73 since 1849 had not undergone decomposition, but had turned into adipocere. This horrible discovery materially assisted the progress of incineration in Switzerland.
Tripp relates that when eight bodies were taken up in a cemetery near Worcester, England, the soil of which was composed chiefly of gravel74 and clay that was always very moist and at times so wet that the water had to be pumped out of the graves, the undecayed body of a nineteen-year-old girl was found which had been buried 51 years and had undergone saponification; the other corpses75 were decomposed77, also the coffins78, while the casket which had contained the saponified body was preserved.
I have seen but one saponified corpse. It was at the museum of the New York College of Physicians and Surgeons; I have forgotten whether it was a man or woman. But I still remember how I shuddered79 at the sight and how I walked close up to the glass case to make sure that the waxy mass within was a human being.
It is superfluous80 to point out here that cremation puts a stop to saponification. One need not be a chemist to know that a body cannot turn into adipocere after it has been reduced to ashes.
Whenever the earth of a graveyard yet contains enough oxygen for the corpses deposited there, the dangers are very few; but whenever this is not the case, the bodies of the dead undergo a horrible metamorphosis, 76known as putrefaction, and become dangerous to the living on account of the poisonous gases and other effluvia generated.
We observe the same phenomenon in our stoves. When but very little air is admitted into them, the combustion of even very inflammable material remains incomplete; and stifling81 gases (for instance, carbonic oxide82 gas) are produced.
It is evident that a porous soil facilitates decomposition, the products of which it absorbs and retains till they have entered into some harmless combination. There is, however, a limit to its efficiency. When it becomes overcharged with the products of decomposition, it can only hold a small quantity of them; the rest are delivered to the water, which permeates83 it and the air which passes over it. On the other hand, it is clear that a very damp, non-porous soil into which the air cannot enter favors putrefaction.
A state of saturation84 is produced in the course of time in the best of cemeteries by a continued system of overcrowding.
Although overcrowding of cemeteries is confined almost entirely85 to the countries of Europe, yet there are many American burial-grounds in which this condition exists; and, what is worse, they are annually86 multiplying. Some of these overcrowded graveyards87 are situated88 in large cities, in the centre of a dense89 population. In these churchyards it is impossible to dig a single grave without the disinterring of the bones of one previously90 buried there. Imagine the consequences of such a state! Isn’t it far better to remove the possibility of future disease and danger at once than to allow it to grow by degrees, till it assumes a terrible 77and fatal dimension? Isn’t it better to refrain from the use of cemeteries entirely, and resort instead to the clean, pure, and undangerous system of incineration? Consider! Does it agree with our ideas of right and wrong to endanger the lives of our great-grandchildren or their offspring by our methods of disposing of the dead? For, by the time they appear on the stage of this world, the burial-ground now sanitary91 will have become a breeding-place of disease from overuse.
When we remove burial-grounds to a distance, we only postpone92 the evil. We insure our own safety, it is true, by so doing; but we encumber93 the ground with most virulent94 seeds, and leave to future generations—to those who come after us—a terrible crop of pollution, disease germs, and death. Our own security from harm should not actuate us in this matter. We should be wise enough to prevent the evil while we have the power, so that our offspring will not justly reproach us for entailing95 upon them such a terrible legacy96.
Among American cities there is none that needs a change of method in the disposal of its dead as greatly as New Orleans, in Louisiana.
Those that are mowed97 down by the grim rider of the white horse cannot be buried there, owing to the excessive moisture of the ground which surrounds the city and the proximity98 of the water to the surface. It is impossible to dig two feet under ground without coming to water. At all times the dead have been disposed of in a very careless manner in New Orleans. It is related that during the yellow-fever epidemic99 of 1853, when New Orleans had a population of 150,000 inhabitants, those that had died of the dread disease were thrown into trenches100 not over 18 inches or two feet 78deep, and covered with very little earth; so little, indeed, that the first rain that came along washed it away. In a graveyard situated in the central part of the city, were buried in this manner 400 bodies, recent victims of yellow fever, and contaminating the air with poisonous exhalations. The mayor of the city was asked to remove the dangerous condition of the burial-ground. He replied, “That’s not my business!” And the commissioner102 of streets, who was next approached, answered in a like spirit. The state of affairs grew worse and worse; and at last, even the negroes refused to act as grave-diggers.
At present, they have a system of entombment in the Crescent City. These tombs are in the municipal cemeteries, 35 of which are within the city limits, giving them the appearance of a collection of bakers’ ovens. The tombs are almost universally made of brick, and whitewashed105. They vary in size from 3 × 6 feet to 10 × 10 feet or 10 × 20 feet; there is a post in the centre, which is surrounded by shelves, on which the body—that is, the coffin—is deposited. There the dead rests for about a year, when it becomes necessary to use the tomb for another corpse; then the remains of the preceding occupant of the vault106 are rudely taken from the casket and dashed head over heels into a pit, where they are left to breed disease.
What wonder, exclaims Kate Field, that yellow fever runs riot in New Orleans, when the air reeks107 with the festering corruption108 of 35 plague spots, exposed for six months of the year to a tropical sun! Think how the death-rate of New Orleans might be reduced by abolition109 of earth-burials! What better field for missionary110 work than our own “Sunny South”?
79The unhealthfulness of these vaults111 is apparent to all, but, owing to prejudice, no other disposition112 of the dead has been adopted. But sooner or later the inhabitants of New Orleans must have recourse to cremation, and burn their dead, as they were forced to do once during a cholera113 epidemic, when 135 corpses were consigned114 to the devouring115 element.
For 300 years English churchyards have been so full that, like the one in Hamlet, Yorick’s bones have had to be dug out in order to put Ophelia’s in. From time to time the attention of the British authorities was directed to the shameful116 state of the cemeteries of the metropolis117 and other places. In that case the matter was brought before Parliament, the government ordered an investigation118, a committee was appointed to examine the grievances120, the committee returned a report with the testimony121 of witnesses, and the report was ordered printed. The report commonly made a very large volume, which looked exceedingly pretty on the shelf on which it was placed, but became dusty in a comparatively short time from non-use. The excitement had quieted down, public opinion and the press were pacified122, Parliament was satisfied, and the condition of the burial-grounds remained the same as before.
The cemeteries of Paris, France, are in no better condition; the mould in the old Cimetière des Innocents is literally123 saturated124 with corpses; Montmartre and Mont Parnasse are overcrowded. As for Père la Chaise,—the burial-place that has been praised in poetry and prose (the resting-place of Racine and Molière), that has been adjudged the most beautiful cemetery in the world,—Père la Chaise is packed with decaying bodies. A cable dispatch dated Dec. 27, 1883, reported that the 80municipal council of the city of Paris had resolved upon leaving those that fell during the reign126 of bloodthirsty La Commune at Père la Chaise for a period of 25 years. Ordinary cadavers128 must be dug up after five years, to make room for their ghastly successors.
In Portugal the soil has become so packed with corpses that an effort was made to enact129 a law that after five years all interred bodies should be dug up and subjected to cremation. This means that after the dead have saturated the ground with disease-producing emanations, and have exhaled130 nearly all their virulent effluvia into the atmosphere, sacrificing the welfare of the living to superstition131 and prejudice, a later incineration shall take place to save space.
Of American cemeteries, I only need mention Pottersfield of New York, the name of which is not spoken or heard by an American without an involuntary shudder60. Our graveyards are, of course, not like the cemeteries of the Old World, where the exhumation132 of bones takes place daily to make room for the recently deceased, but they will become so unless the damaging prejudices are laid aside and something is done to prevent such a poisonous and dangerous situation. In some of the old cemeteries in our cities it has become impossible to dig another grave.
Rev9. John D. Beugless, D.D., thus describes the burial-grounds of New York City: “Of the great cemeteries about New York, there is not one, not even Woodland or Greenwood, in the public lots of which three or more bodies are not put in one grave,—that of John Doe, who died from ‘a bare bodkin,’ being sandwiched between those of Richard Roe103 and James Low, who were victims respectively of small-pox and yellow-fever. 81In the public or poor quarter of Calvary Cemetery a far worse state of things obtains—more appalling133 than even the fosse commune of Paris, for it is the fosse commune sans chaux. A trench101 is dug, seven feet wide, ten to twelve feet deep, and of indefinite length, in which the coffins are stowed, tier upon tier, making a flight of steps, five or more deep, and with not enough earth to hide one from the next. And this is our vaunted ‘Christian134 burial’ in this new country, with its myriads135 of broad acres! What shall our children say of us, when they come, perforce, from stress of space, to build their dwellings136 upon these beds of pestilence?”
THE CREMATORIUM AT BRESCIA.
(From Dr. Pini’s work.)
That is the way we, “the Christian nation par8 excellence,” treat friendless paupers137 and criminals. Shame! shame! A dog is more decently interred.
The cemeteries of the city of Brooklyn occupy nearly 2000 acres of land. A thoughtful eminent23 physician gives it as his opinion that the prevailing139 southwest wind, blowing over these corruption festering plague spots, carries to Flatbush the germs of typhoid fever and diphtheria, and swells140 the death-rate of that city to its present alarming magnitude.
82The more one considers cremation, the more one finds himself wondering how it has come to pass that we practice interment, with its many faults and dangers, and do not burn our dead.
It is clear that overcrowding of burial-grounds must lead to evil consequences. A ground that is saturated with putrefying material can emit naught but poisonous odors, cannot fail to contaminate the purest and clearest water, must vitiate any atmosphere.
Incineration deserves the respect to-day which the ancients paid to it, and is the only way of disposing of the dead so as to avoid the terrible consequences of the mephitic graveyard gases, of the dangers with which the ordinary mode of burial threatens us.
The truth was taught us by the Tuscans some three hundred years ago. At that time a whale was cast upon the shore of Tuscany. The inhabitants of the surrounding country hastened to the spot, and removed the ribs141 of the large fish, to hang them in the churches as a memento142 of the rare occurrence. The flesh was left to rot in the scorching143 southern sun. An epidemic of typhoid fever was the result; and when, ten years later, another whale happened to strand144 in the same locality, the people, having become wise by its previous experience, destroyed the monster by chopping it to pieces, and burning these, one after another.
There are many lurking145 dangers, ready to destroy the living, in the burial-grounds of the present day. The mephitic vapors146 increase in quantity as decomposition advances, and become far more poisonous than either arsenic148 or prussic acid, if these were uncombined in their natural state.
These dangerous graveyard gases can spread to quite 83a distance, and therefore can communicate the most malignant149 maladies at all times. Dr. Ayr claims that they extend to a distance of a hundred meters; some authorities assert that they reach sometimes twice the distance. This occurs generally when the grave is air-tight above, and the surface layer of the cemetery soil is imporous. Then the gas escapes where it finds the least resistance,—at the sides,—and burrows150 along under the earth until it strikes a cavity, and bursts into it, or diffuses151 into the air. When the grave offers no resistance above, the gas enters the atmosphere directly. Burial-grounds best fitted for cemetery purposes should be feared most, for it is evident that dryness and porousness152 are qualities which, although conducive153 to the rapid decay of a body, very much facilitate the escape of gases.
The danger is not obviated154 by deep burials. In that case the morbific matter is diffused155 through the subsoil. If the inhumations are so deep as to impede156 escapes at the surface, there is only the greater danger of escape by deep drainage, and the pollution of springs and wells. Dr. Reid detected the escape of deleterious miasma157 from graves more than twenty feet deep.
The danger from inhaling158 graveyard gases is great.
Ramazzini relates how an avaricious159 grave-digger, by the name of Pisto, met with instantaneous death on descending160 into a vault to steal the shoes of a corpse; he was found dead upon the body.
Lancisius (De noxiis palud. effluv. II, Ep. 1, c. 2, p. 152) states that several grave-diggers died in a like manner after entering a newly opened vault, which had been set under water by an inundation161 of the Tiber, 84and in which the stagnant163 water had regenerated164 the virulent gases.
Unger gives an account of a case similar to that of Haguenot, reported further on. A vault was reopened in a convent at Madrid, for the purpose of depositing therein a fresh corpse. When the grave-digger was about to descend into it, he fell down dead. Two other persons, who tried to save him, shared his fate.
Fortunatus Licetus (De annull, antiquitt. c. 23) relates that three men, who went into a vault that was full of semi-decomposed bodies with the intention of robbing, lost their lives. When the bodies were extracted, they were found to be swollen166 and black.
Th. Bartholini (Historiar. anat. rarior. C. IV, obs. 32, p. 296) made experiments in Denmark which confirm these reports concerning the lethal167 action of graveyard gases, and prove the especial danger from the gases of the dead long pent up in vaults. He affirms that these noxious168 gases often prove fatal, death being preceded by dizziness and fainting.
The gases of Francis I operated with fatal effect upon the vandals who broke open his coffin, in the time of the French Revolution, to rob it of its treasures.
Books on hygiene169 teem170 with examples of the lethal properties of an atmosphere containing carbonic acid in excess. A familiar instance is that of the passengers of the ship Londonderry, in 1848, 150 of whom were shut up by the captain during a storm, in the steerage 18 × 11 × 7 feet. Seventy of them died in an incredibly short space of time, with convulsions and bleeding at the eyes and ears.
Haguenot reports that, in 1744, the corpse of a monk171 of the Penitent172 Order, who had been buried in a vault 85under the church, was exhumed173 in the church of Notre Dame174, at Montpellier, France. A man descended175 into the vault to remove the cadaver127, but, before he got quite down, he was taken with convulsions, and fell unconscious into the vault, where he died of suffocation176. A monk went down to rescue him, but he too was taken sick, and, on having been pulled out immediately, succumbed178 quickly. A third, who had the courage to follow his example, fell dead without being able to retire. The same fate was reserved for a fourth victim,—a brother of the first. The bodies were pulled out with hooks; the stench of their clothing was unbearable180. Lights held near the opening of the vault extinguished; dogs, cats, and birds, on being brought in contact with the poisonous gases, died, with all symptoms of a severe convulsion, in a few minutes. Some of the mephitic gas was bottled; but when experimented with after two and one-half months, it still had all of its dangerous qualities.
In 1749, when new vaults and graves were made in the St. Eustachius Church at Paris, France, cadavers were dug up and placed temporarily in an old vault of the church, which had remained locked a long time. Children coming to church to prepare for confirmation181, and even adults, fainted on entering the sacred edifice182, and some had serious attacks of illness. The same took place in St. Sebastian Church at Madrid, Spain, in 1786; three times a grave burst open, in which, but a short time before, a very corpulent lady had been buried. The horrible smell that arose from this grave prevented the reading of the holy mass at the high altar during a period of eight days. At one time the Parish Church of Metz was so infected by the gases of 86a female corpse that it had to be abandoned, and the divine service removed to another church.
In 1841 two men who had some work to do in a grave in St. Botolph’s Churchyard, Aldgate, England, died almost instantly on entering it.
In the churchyard at Cobham, in Surrey, England, on account of some changes in the church, some bodies had to be raised. The work of the navvies was horrible beyond description, and dangerous beside. It was performed very early in the morning, and was beset183 with difficulties. Repeated doses of gin had to be given to the men to keep them at a kind of work which they could only do under the influence of alcohol. Three men perished in 1852, at Paris, from inhaling the gas that escaped from coffins.
Fourcroy affirms that grave-digging is an unhealthy and dangerous occupation, and that all grave-diggers he examined showed symptoms of slow poisoning.
George A. Walker declared that no grave-digger ever wholly escaped the influence of graveyard gases. Some of the men employed in this way have noticed the peculiar184 smell of the gases on beginning to dig.
Monsieur Patissier reports several deaths due to grave-digging; and Mr. Chadwick asserts that the vocation185 of a sexton shortens life one-third. Usually grave-diggers are heavy drinkers; they take to drinking to resist the malignant influence of the vapors which arise slowly but surely out of the cemetery soil, and to do away with any “maudlin sentimentality” that may still linger in their hearts, and that might interfere186 with their horrible work.
On March 1, 1886, Marke Thornton, of Washington, Ga., met with a singular death. His decease resulted 87from inhaling poisonous gas which seeped187 through into a grave he was digging by the side of another. The other men at work with him left the grave as soon as they detected the gas, but Thornton, thinking there was no danger in it, remained and died.
The action of cemetery gases on the human body manifests itself in a variety of ways. Sir T. Spencer Wells states that decomposing188 human remains so pollute earth, air, and water as to diminish the general health and average duration of life.
Dr. Lyon Playfair affirms that the inspiration of graveyard gases does not always cause one form of decay or putrefaction, but that it depends entirely upon the organs attacked. Entering the blood, it produces fever; communicated to the viscera, it gives origin to diarrh?a, and may, Dr. Playfair thinks, even be the source of consumption. When the irrespirable gas enters the respiratory tract165, Dr. Southwood Smith claims that it is conveyed into the system through the thin and delicate walls of the air-vesicles of the lungs in the act of respiration189. He states that turpentine, for instance, if only inhaled190 when passing through a room that was recently painted, will exhibit its effects in some of the fluid excretions of the body even more rapidly than if it had been taken into the stomach. Dr. Riecke thinks that putrid emanations operate also through the olfactory191 nerves by powerful, penetrating192, and offensive smells.
Cemeteries are breeding grounds as well as foci of disease and death.
88
THE CREMATORIUM AT WOKING, ENGLAND.
Mr. Chadwick, in his “Report on the Practice of Interment in Towns” (London, 1843), writes:—
“The injurious effects of exhalations from the decomposition in question on the health and life of man is proved by a sufficient number of trustworthy facts. The injurious influence is manifest in proportion to the concentration of the emanations. Sometimes it produces asphyxia and sudden death. In a less concentrated state the emanations produce fainting, nausea194, headache, languor195. If, however, they are often repeated, they produce nervous and other fevers, or impart to fevers arising from other causes a typhoid type.... As there appear to be no cases in which the emanations from decomposing human remains are not of a deleterious nature, so there is no case in which the liability to danger should be incurred196 by interment amidst the dwellings of the living, it being established as a general conclusion that all interments in towns 89where bodies decompose76, contribute to the mass of atmospheric impurity197 which is injurious to public health.”
The Italian physician Felix Dell’Acqua gives it as his opinion (in his study on cremation), that graveyards infect the earth, the air, and the water, and constantly endanger public health during an epidemic. Dr. Polli proved that graves deteriorate198 the air we breathe and contaminate the water we drink, by loading them with organic matter.
Prof. Antonio Selmi, of Mantua, claims to have discovered organic germs in the air above graves, which he called septopneuma, and which, when injected under the skin of a pigeon, caused a typhus-like disease that ended in death within three days.
Specific germs may enter the atmosphere from the graves, which convey the deadliest of maladies, being carried very far by the wind. But the agent that makes cemetery gases so dangerous is carbonic acid.
Dr. Parkes (Practical Hygiene), the eminent English scientist, says:—
“The decomposition of bodies gives rise to a very large amount of carbonic acid. Ammonia and an offensive putrid vapor147 are also given off. The air of most cemeteries is richer in carbonic acid, and the organic matter is perceptibly large, when tested by potassium permanganate.”
It is a well-known fact that carbonic acid, when inhaled in an undiluted state, causes death; it is fatal to all forms of life. When inhaled diluted199 with air it interferes200 with the introduction of oxygen into the body, and causes the carbonic acid, which should be eliminated, to be retained. This, no doubt, prevents 90the proper tissue changes, and must in time undermine the healthiest body by seriously affecting its nutrition.
Dr. E. J. Bermingham (Disposal of the Dead) says:—
“The effect of constantly breathing an atmosphere containing an excess of carbonic acid is not perfectly201 known. Dr. Angus Smith has attempted to determine the effect of carbonic acid per se—the influence of organic matter of respiration being eliminated. He found that three volumes per thousand caused great feebleness of the circulation, with diminished rapidity of the heart’s action; the respirations were, on the contrary, quickened, and were sometimes gasping202. These effects were lessened203 when the amount of carbonic acid was smaller; but were perceptible when the amount was as low as one volume per thousand.”
According to Haberman, sensitive and nervous persons have been taken ill when walking by a cemetery.
P. Frazer, Jr., says: “A sexton and the son of a lady who died seven days before went down into the vault. Both were affected204 with sickness and nausea; one was affected for some years; the son had ulceration of the throat for two years.”
Mr. William Eassie affirms that, “according to a report of the French Academy of Medicine, the putrid emanations of Père la Chaise, Montmartre, and Montparnasse have caused frightful205 diseases of the throat and lungs, to which numbers of both sexes fall victims every year. Thus a dreadful throat disease which baffles the skill of our most experienced medical men, and which carries off its victims in a few hours, is traced to the absorption of vitiated air into the windpipe, and has been observed to rage with the greatest violence in those quarters situated nearest to cemeteries.”
91The most common diseases produced by graveyard gases are diphtheria, throat and pulmonary affections, severe diarrh?a, and dysentery. The number of cases reported is enormous. Many cases have been made public by Drs. Parkes and Tardieu.
Ramazzini (Maladies des Artisans, p. 71) asserts that sextons, whose business often compels them to enter places where there are putrefying bodies, are subject to malignant fevers, asphyxia, and suffocating206 catarrhs.
Fourcroy affirms that there are innumerable examples of the pernicious effects of cadaveric207 exhalations.
It has been stated that the carbonic acid generated by the decaying bodies is taken up by the plants, shrubbery, and trees abounding208 in cemeteries and their neighborhood. That excellent and well-edited newspaper Iron declares: “The consumption of vegetables whose roots had been nourished by the defunct209 members of a family would hardly be enjoyed by the survivors210, unless, indeed, they possessed the philosophic211 mind and robust212 appetite of the French gentleman who declared that, with a certain sauce, ‘on mangerait bien son père.’”
I do not believe that very much carbonic acid is absorbed by the botanical burial-ground decorations; certainly not enough to prevent its toxic214 action and the vitiation of the air.
Many a time was premature215 exhumation followed by fatal consequences.
In the church of a village near Nantes, France, the remains of an aristocrat216 were buried in 1774. By accident some of the other graves were opened, among them one which contained the corpse of a man who had been 92buried three months before. An unbearable odor immediately filled the church. Many persons who had attended at this burial were taken sick; fifteen died in a short time, the first to depart being the grave-digger who had opened the graves.
Vicq d’Azyr states that an epidemic was produced in Auvergne, by the opening of an old graveyard.
Norman Chevers (European Soldiers in India, p. 404) refers to the unhealthiness of the continent at Sukkur, India. Fevers of the most malignant type were abounding, owing to an ancient Mussulman burial-ground on which the station was placed.
Tardieu, the eminent French physician and scientist, relates (Dict. d’Hygiene, p. 517) that the excavation217 of an old cemetery of a convent in Paris caused illness in the occupants of the adjacent dwellings. Tardieu (Ibid., p. 463) compiled a very considerable number of cases, not only of asphyxia, but of several febrile affections produced by exhumation and disturbance218 of bodies.
Bascom relates that when the parish church in Minchinhampton, England, was rebuilding in 1843, the black earth of the cemetery surrounding it, or what was superfluous, was disposed of for manure219, being spread upon adjoining fields. The earth was removed to change the grade of the churchyard. The result was that an epidemic broke out in the neighborhood. Children on their way to school took it. Seventeen deaths occurred, and more than 200 children had measles220, scarlet221 fever, and various eruptions222.
It seems, however, as though the above figures are not quite correct, for Mr. Eassie, who has lately made personal inquiries223 upon the spot, insists that the mischief224 93which resulted has been even understated, and that the population was nearly decimated.
Dr. Adalbert Kuettlinger brings forward the sequent case to prove the deleterious action of cemetery gases. A very obese225 lady died during the month of July, 1854. Previous to death she had requested, as a special favor, that her remains be buried in the church to which she belonged. This was granted and promised her. After her demise226 she was interred in a vault of the church, and the next day the minister delivered the funeral oration213. It was very warm that day; several months before the lady’s departure there had been aridity227, and not a drop of rain had fallen in a long time. The funeral sermon had been delivered on a Saturday; on the following Sunday the Protestant clergyman preached to an assemblage of nearly 900, who had come to attend the Lord’s Supper. The warm weather still continued; many had to leave church during the service to keep from fainting; many swooned away before they could withdraw. In Germany people fast before they communicate. The sermon lasted nearly one hour and one quarter, after which the bread was consecrated228 and stood uncovered—according to custom—during the ceremony. There were 180 communicants. One quarter of an hour after the solemnity, before they had time to leave the church, more than 60 became ill; some died in severe convulsions; others, who had placed themselves immediately under medical treatment, recovered. The consternation229 among the whole congregation and citizens was great. There was a general belief that the wine used at the communion had been poisoned. The sexton and some other individuals who assisted at divine service were imprisoned230. The next 94Sunday the minister delivered a severe sermon, and pointed119 out several of his parishioners as participants in the conspiracy231. This enthusiastic sermon was printed and widely circulated. The prisoners had to endure cruel treatment. They remained incarcerated232 a whole week, and some, it is said, were tortured; yet they always insisted upon their innocence233. The second Sunday from the time of the fatal occurrence, the city authorities ordered that a chalice234 should stand uncovered on the altar one hour. The time had hardly passed when it was noticed that the wine was covered with thousands of little insects, which, by means of the sunbeams, were traced to the grave of the corpulent lady who had been buried fourteen days before. Four men were commissioned to open the vault and remove the coffin. When they attempted this, two of them died at once, and the others were only saved by the great efforts of the physician in attendance. The accused were liberated235, and the city council and clergyman begged their pardon.
Rev. Dr. Render, in “A Tour through Germany,” says:—
“Two of the crew of an American merchant ship went ashore236 near Canton, to dig a grave to bury a dead shipmate. The spade struck and penetrated238 a coffin of a man buried a few months before, and the discharge of gas struck down both the sailors, who, though taken back to the ship, died within five days.”
I doubt that there is any one who will assert that it is delightful239 to drink an aqueous solution of one’s own grandfather or great-grandmother, yet there are many who do so. The emanations from our ancestors may and do filter through the earth, and get into the water we drink. Think of that!
95Wells, springs, and rivers are polluted by the infiltration240 of water highly charged with organic matter. Often such water has been the cause of fatal disease, yet nothing was done to guard against it.
THE DORCHESTER-SHIRE CREMATION FURNACE.
Prof. Victor C. Vaughan, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Michigan, in a paper on “Water Supply,” read at a sanitary convention at Ypsilanti, Mich., July 1, 1885, states:—
“To show you the stupidity and recklessness of people, even in this enlightened century, which is manifested concerning the contamination of water, I must mention one other case. There is in the county of Kalamazoo, in this state, a nice little village by the name of Richland. It is situated in a most beautiful farming country. The farmers of that region have grown rich on account of the fertility of the soil and other special advantages. A few years ago the village 96board desired to select a new site for a cemetery, and chose one within the village limits, and within 30 rods of a well owned by an old physician, Dr. Patchin. I always tell names in such cases, because they tell the truth, and any one can investigate them. The old doctor objected to the location of the cemetery so near his house and well, and as the result of his objection there was a lawsuit241; and if you will pardon me, I will mention something of the condition of the land and some experiments that were made. There were some 18 inches of rich prairie land, then below this some two or three feet of hard-pan, below this there were 18 or 20 feet of gravel, such as we have all through the southern part of Michigan. In digging the graves the bodies would be put into this gravel. The gravel was so loose and so moist that in digging graves it was necessary to put in boxing to prevent the gravel from pouring in while the grave was being dug. Below the gravel, and about 30 feet below the surface, was an impervious242 bed of clay, with a slope from the cemetery towards the well. It became a question now as to whether there was a possibility of the contamination of this well from burying bodies in the proposed new cemetery. I was called, and after studying the geological formation, concluded that there was a possibility of such contamination. The well was pumped dry twice a day, and on an average fifteen barrels taken from it each pumping. To show how ridiculous some theories are that have been advanced upon that subject, I will state that I was met in court with this statement: that it would be impossible for any of the water or rain falling upon this cemetery, 30 rods distant, to reach the well, because, as was found in some old book, all the water that goes into 97a well is that which falls upon a surface which will be enclosed in a circle whose center was the mouth of the well, and whose radius243 was the depth of the well. This statement was made independent of any lay of the land or the geological formation, and without any consideration whatever of the surrounding country. Fortunately this can be met very easily. Thirty barrels of water were pumped from the well each day. We know the amount of rainfall in Michigan per year, and we can calculate very easily the number of barrels that would fall upon this surface enclosed in a circle whose center was the mouth of the well, and whose radius was the depth of the well; and as the result of such a calculation we find that the amount of rain falling upon this surface during the year would not supply the well more than two or three days. Returning home and detailing the trip to Dr. Langley, he suggested that a direct experiment might be made to see whether matter would pass from the proposed cemetery to the well or not. He tested the water of the well for lithium, a substance easily detected, found it was absent, then had a salt of lithium sown over the proposed cemetery, and then examined the water of the well each day thereafter; and on the eighteenth day after the lithium was sown over the cemetery it was found in the water of the well, showing that the water did unquestionably penetrate237 the soil, pass down to the impervious bed of clay which was the watershed244 upon which the water in the well collected, and thence into the well. Notwithstanding proofs so positive as this, a learned judge in Michigan dismissed the case, and allowed the cemetery to be located there, with a possibility of poisoning a number of families. As a result, the families of the 98neighborhood had to discontinue the use of their well-water.”
Professor Vaughan holds that the popular belief that if water filters for any distance through the soil it is purified, is an erroneous belief, and cites a number of experiments made by himself, and numerous cases, in support of the assertion.
According to Dr. H. B. Baker104, secretary of the Michigan State Board of Health (vide Report for 1874, p. 136), a terrible epidemic of cerebro-spinal meningitis, that wasted the village of Petersburg in the early part of 1874, was attributable to a spring five paces from a house and 15 paces from a cemetery, which is on ground from 12 to 15 feet higher than the level of the spring. About 18 paces from the spring was a recent grave.
Prof. R. C. Kedzie, of the Michigan State Agricultural College, to whom some of the water was sent for analysis, concluded his report as follows:—
“The presence in these waters of unusual quantities of chlorides, of ammonia, of albuminoid ammonia, of nitrates and nitrites, and finally of phosphates, shows these waters to be very unusual in their composition. We might account for the presence of all these substances if matters very rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, e.g., flesh, were undergoing decomposition in their vicinity, and the results of this decomposition passed directly into this water. The fact that the spring is near and lies below the level of the graveyard, that the well is in the midst of an old Indian graveyard, gives much plausibility245 to this explanation. The fact that the first person attacked with cerebro-spinal meningitis in Petersburg used the water of this well, and that 99others who used the spring water were attacked with the same disease, would very naturally attract very significant attention to the composition of these waters as having some possible connection with the epidemic.”
For several years many residents of Nyack, N.Y., have protested against the encroachment246 of the Oak Hill Cemetery property upon the thickly populated portions of the village, objections being principally made on sanitary grounds. Examination of the ponds and wells of the village has demonstrated that they are being constantly polluted by the emanations from the cemetery.
Not long ago the Detroit Evening News declared that the wells in the neighborhood of Woodmere Cemetery do not catch the rainwater until after it has been filtered through the thousands of graves in the cemetery, filled with decaying bodies, and that no water is obtained in the vicinity which is not discolored and has a brackish248 taste. After a heavy rain the impurities249 are most pronounced. The residents of Woodmere have long ago given over the use of water as a beverage250. I do not blame them. I would not like to drink fluid extract of dead man myself.
The New York Staats Zeitung, a reliable German publication, of May 27, 1886, relates that a lawsuit of North Bergen Township, N.J., against the Weehawken Cemetery Company, was tried the preceding day before Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, at Newark, N.J. The township demands that for sanitary reasons the cemetery shall be closed at once and no further burials permitted in the same. Several physicians testified to the fact that diphtheria and other infectious diseases are endemic in the township, and that they are due mainly to 100the unhygienic state of the cemetery, which lies in the most populated part of the township. One physician gave it as his opinion that numerous cases of diphtheria that appeared among the little pupils of a school was caused by drinking water from a well in the proximity of the cemetery.
In an address on “Public Health, or Sanitary Science,” read before the medical society of the state of West Virginia, May 24, 1882, Dr. T. S. Camden says:—
“The Board of Health report for 1879 gives the investigation of an outbreak of diphtheria in Northern Vermont, which occurred in May, 1879. In a school of 22 persons, 16 were prostrated251 in two days, one-half of whom died. Upon investigation the cause of the outbreak was found to be from the public drinking water from a brook138 into which had been thrown the carcasses of dead animals. Another outbreak of the disease of great virulence252 was caused by persons using water that was poisoned by the dead carcass of an animal that had been buried 75 feet distant from a spring. The grass in this instance showed by its luxuriance the trace to the spring. After the germs were once developed in many of these cases by drinking the polluted water, the disease was communicated to other persons far removed from the cause of the primary outbreak. One convalescent patient communicated the disease to six persons. Numerous illustrations of the importance of sanitary regulations are given in these epidemics253.”
Thus we have illustrations of the origin of diphtheria from putrid animal matter; and, after the germs were implanted in persons, fatal epidemics spread, and many lives were lost that could have been saved by proper hygienic measures.
101Dr. Prosper254 de Pietra Santa, the most enthusiastic French cremationist, and a man who has investigated everything pertaining255 to incineration thoroughly256, calls attention to the example of the villages of Rotondella and Bollita. The burial-grounds of these ill-starred villages were situated on the summit of hills that were beset with woods. They were at the lawful257 distance, and to all appearances in a most favorable location. Unfortunately, the springs from which the inhabitants were accustomed to derive49 their water supply emerged from the base of the hills which were surmounted258 by the woods. These springs were the result of collections of rainwater, which, percolating259 through the earth of the hills, became impregnated with the organic matter which the ground contained. In the course of time, the drinking-water of these two villages became so contaminated that it caused a frightful epidemic.
Prof. Dr. E. Reichardt, of Jena (Gesundheit I, No. 1), published a large number of cases in which drinking-water was polluted by cemetery emanations.
Many cases are on record where water contaminated by graveyard emanations, by poisonous fluids oozing260 through the soil, has proven harmful to health. Numerous cases of typhoid fever sprung from this source. Contagious261 diseases can also be communicated in this way. Riecke and Galtie have compiled statistics of cases of typhoid fever and other contagious maladies due to this cause that withstand the severest criticism.
“The rivers die into offensive pools,
And, charged with putrefaction, breathe a gross
And mortal nuisance into all the air.”
102
CREMATION IN THE CASEMENTS262 OF PARIS DURING THE REIGN OF THE COMMUNE.
Kate Field, the well-known author and lecturer, says:
“These are times that are trying men’s and women’s bodies quite as much as their souls. The zymotic diseases breaking out in what were formerly263 healthy villages may set even the blindest to seek for causes; and perhaps the most prejudiced may finally be forced to admit that one great source of water contamination is the existence of multitudinous graveyards contiguous to habitations. In my daily excursions on horseback, which cover about 15 miles, I count seven graveyards 103perched on hills, the occupants of the adjacent towns preparing for speedy exit from this world by living below the dead and using well-water. Suggest to them that the prevailing ‘malaria’ may be due to drinking up the remains of their deceased ancestors, and a howl of ‘sacrilege’ rends264 the air.”
And in an admirable essay on cremation in the St. Louis Daily Globe-Democrat of July 12, 1885, this graceful265 writer, deservedly noted266, states:—
“New England villages, once so free from ills, are taking on the airs of invalids267; and it is often a question whether families that remain in big towns during the summer are not better off than their wealthier neighbors, who hie to overcrowded so-called watering places, not unfrequently returning with germs of typhoid fever in their systems, that later breaks forth to their amazement268, and for which they are at a loss to account. They forget how they drank well-water, the springs of which percolated269 through peaceful village graveyards. Man’s worst enemies are his own superstition and ignorance.
“I learned by terrible experience when very young the horrors of earth burial. I now know its crime against the living.”
Miss Field is not only converted to but convinced of incineration, convinced that it is preferable to any other method; the moment a cremation society was incorporated in New York, she became a member.
Col. R. E. Whitman, U. S. A., remarks: “People who wonder at the change that has come over our New England villages, the homes of a vigorous ancestry270, and deplore271 the advent272 of this mysterious ‘malaria,’ the unseen vampire273 that sucks the red blood of the present 104generation, would do well to look about them and see how the graveyards, old and new, have grown in two centuries, how the town has surrounded them; how the water supply is from the same old wells; how the town, never having arrived at a magnitude seeming to demand a sewerage system, allows the refuse of generations to mingle with the surface soil. It would be a theme worthy193 of the magic pen of Nathaniel Hawthorne. Imagine his description of water percolating through the grave of some despised Lazarus, feeding the well of his life enemy, Dives, and compelling him daily to quaff275 the poison his own cruel ignorance had distilled276.”
Undoubtedly277 many country towns whose cemeteries are in their midst are drinking daily, despite the acknowledged impurity of the water, disease and death. An English writer very pertinently278 remarks that “if the formation of a deep sewer274 will suffice to drain dry the wells near its line of march, then the sinking of a well near a burying-ground must help to drain the latter.”
Much complaint was at one time made in England, concerning the pollution of wells by cemeteries. In Versailles, France, the water of the wells which lie below the churchyard of St. Louis, could not be used on account of its pollution.
Deep wells have been found to be infected more than 600 feet from the cemeteries. In France and in some parts of Germany, the opening of wells within 300 feet of a cemetery has been prohibited. The reports of the boards of health of Massachusetts and New Jersey279 give abundant evidence that country graveyards often contaminate the water supply when the wells are on a 105lower level. The Michigan reports also contain a description of a case that occurred at Grand Rapids.
A hygienic council held some time ago at Brussels decided280 that wells could not be safely dug nearer than 400 yards to any graveyard, and that even at that distance absolute protection was not certain.
The constant prevalence of dysentery at Secunderabad, in the Deccan (India), seems to have been partly due to the water which filtered through an extensive burial-ground. One of the sources of water contained, by analysis, according to Dr. Parkes, 119 grains of solids per gallon; and in some instances there were 8, 11, and even 30 grains per gallon, of organic matter.
Sir J. McGrigor partly attributed the fatality281 of dysentery in the Peninsula, at Ciudad Roderigo, to the use of water percolating through a graveyard in which nearly 20,000 bodies had been hastily inhumed.
Medical Councilor, Dr. Kuechenmeister, who examined the wells of Dresden, Germany, discovered the water to be very impure282, especially in the new parts of the city, and in the vicinity of the so-called “French” graves. The same results were arrived at in Zuerich, where it was demonstrated that the typhoid fever epidemic of Auszerbuehl was due to water rendered impure by cadaveric effluvia.
In Philadelphia, three cemeteries, containing 80,000 graves, are so situated as to be liable to drain into the Schuylkill, the drinking-water of 1,000,000 of people. The diarrh?a prevalent during the Centennial Exhibition in the Quaker City is said (by many eminent sanitarians) to have been caused by burial-ground water drunk by strangers unaccustomed to it.
The monumental cemetery at Milan, which is situated 106upon a hill some 180 yards to the north of the city, was proved to have been the cause of serious illness in its neighborhood, produced by the contamination of the wells in the vicinity. The water of the well of the Place Garibaldi was analyzed283 by Professors Parvesi and Rotundi, who found it tainted284 by organic matter.
The Atlanta Medical Journal states that two young ladies who drank water from a spring situated on a hillside, near an old graveyard, became severely285 ill. One was seized with py?mia and diarrh?a, the other with typhoid fever; both died. Cattle that drank of the water were also made sick.
Professor Pumpilly has made certain by recent experiments that sandy soil does not prevent bacterial286 infection from entering a well situated at a considerable distance from cesspools and cemeteries. Indeed, he claims further that “dry gravel and coarse sand do not prevent the entrance into houses built upon them of those microorganisms which swarm287 in the ground-air, around leaky cesspools, near graveyards, and in the filthy288 made land of cities.”
Anent the idea that the gases and organic matters which arise from the graves rapidly undergo changes by entering into new combinations when brought into contact with the earth, Dr. John O. Marble, of Worcester, Mass., says:—
“The monstrous289 delusion290 that the mere247 contact of the corpse with fresh earth renders it innocuous, and suffices for safe disinfection, is dissipated by overwhelming evidence. I distinctly remember my boyish scruples291 concerning the water of a well situated not fifty yards from graves in the churchyard adjoining my father’s garden. This old ‘God’s acre’ I have a hundred times 107passed, in my timid boyhood, in the shades of night, with palpitating heart, and a pace rivalled only by that of Tam O’ Shanter’s steed from witch-haunted Kirk Alloway to the ‘Keystone’ of the ‘Brig o’ Doon.’ My father overcame my scruples concerning the water by stating the belief then held, that the earth was a purifier and a safe depurator, and that no harm could come to that well, 30 feet deep, the pride and unfailing source of supply of the neighborhood. Yet I, that same autumn, suffered a severe and nearly fatal attack of typhoid fever, and another member of the family was similarly affected a year later. The fever occurred when the well was low, and I have no doubt, in the light of present knowledge of such dangers, that, repulsive as is the thought, I drank water filtered through the bones of my revered292 ancestors buried there, and that the polluted water caused that illness. To those who criticise293 the advocates of cremation for quoting ancient examples only, of harm from graves, this instance will appear sufficiently294 recent and intimate.”
Opponents of incineration, who lay great stress upon the disinfecting powers of the earth, forget that the soil is easily saturated by the emanations from the dead. Professor Presscott, of the University of Michigan, says in regard to this matter:—
“The purifying power of ground, like that of the air above it, is limited and easily overcharged. If ground-air be loaded with more putrescent vapor than it can oxidize, then poison is carried through the porous earth.”
Dr. William Porter, of St. Louis, Mo., has recorded the following case:—
“A young man died suddenly from diphtheria, and was buried in the village churchyard. At some little 108distance was a well, from which the good church-goers drank freely each Sunday. Finally the water of the well became f?tid, for the supply was infiltrated295 by the horrible decomposition from this, the nearest grave. Was it not suggestive that 20 from that congregation died from diphtheria while this impure well was in use? These people lived in mountain homes, in a pure atmosphere, and though many of these cases were isolated296,—far removed from others,—yet in all the disease was alike virulent and deadly.”
Churchyard emanations can penetrate almost anything; they have a remarkable297 force. The chairman and superintendent298 of sewers299 of Holborn and Finsbury division, London, claimed that putrid matter from cemeteries over 30 feet distant had penetrated the cement and brick of his drain.
Several years ago, when Mr. Holland, the English government inspector300 of burial-grounds, investigated the state of Tooting Cemetery, it transpired301 that the drainage provided for the burial-ground was insufficient302; there was merely a system of surface drainage. In one case (admitted by the cemetery board) a coffin was placed in a grave that contained enough water to cover the head of it. The entire drainage of the burial-ground was conducted into a ditch near by, which ended in the river Wandle, from which the inhabitants obtained their drinking-water.
Lefort (in a monograph303 to the Paris Academy of Sciences) points to the possibility of well-contamination by neighboring cemeteries. In one instance he detected, by chemical analysis, that a well was polluted by a burial-ground 50 metres distant.
109
Retort
Lancaster Crematorium
The Parisian scientist M. Duchamp detected a spring 110that percolated entirely through graveyards, picking up organic matter on the way, and that tasted very strongly.
Not a few analyses of water tainted by graveyard emanations testify to the fact that it is harmful, nay304, that it is extremely dangerous, to those who consume it. Nor is the danger always apparent. In 1874 the Broad Street pump at London, England, carried cholera to those who drank its water; yet the latter looked clean, had no perceptible taste, and was odorless.
“The very witching time of night
When graveyards yawn, and hell itself breathes out
Contagion305 on this world.”
—Shakespeare.
To the question, “Can an epidemic of any kind be caused by graveyard emanations?” there is but one reply; the facts on record compel us to answer in the affirmative.
Dr. Buck306, in his excellent work on Hygiene, writes: “It is impossible for any one to say how long the materies morbi may continue to live underground. If organic matter can be boiled and frozen without losing its vitality307, and seeds 3000 years old will sprout308 when planted, it would be hardihood to assert that the poison of cholera, or small-pox, or typhus may not for years lie dormant309, but not dead, in the moist temperature of the grave.”
Dr. Wheelhouse, of Leeds, England, says: “Do we not shun310, and that most wisely, the presence of those afflicted311 with infectious diseases as long as they remain amongst us; and yet, no sooner are they removed by death than we are content, with tender sympathy indeed, and most loving care, it is true (but with how much wisdom?) to lay them in the ground, that they 111may slowly dissipate their terribly infectious gases through the soil, and saturating312 that, may thereby recharge the rains of heaven as they filter through it, with all their virulence and terrible power of reproduction in the systems of the living. I am not the thorough and entire believer in the disinfecting and depurating power of the soil that I once was, for terrible examples of its failure have, in my judgment313, come under my notice.”
Often the site of an old grave is used to make a new one, and in consequence earth is brought to light that is saturated with the effluvia of corpses of those who, perhaps, have died of some contagious or infectious disease. The crime that is committed by individuals when they bury persons deceased of such maladies is pithily314 expressed by that champion of modern cremation, Sir Henry Thompson, who says: “Is it not indeed a social sin of no small magnitude to sow the seeds of disease and death broadcast, caring only to be certain that they cannot do much harm to our own generation?” But such is selfish human nature!
The first to show the connection between epidemics and the process of decomposition was Professor Pettenkofer, of Munich, Bavaria. He demonstrated that the presence of putrefying organic bodies, air, moisture, and warmth, in a porous soil, are the potent315 factors which originate and develop pestilential germs.
The great mortality, the severity, that attended in former times the appearance of epidemics in cities where graveyards were situated in the center of a large population, illustrates316 the deadly influence which these “God’s acres” have.
112Saint Augustine pointed to the fact that epidemics are caused by decomposing organic bodies.
Forestus reported many cases of malignant fever caused by the emanations of cadavers.
Ambrose Paré, the renowned317 French surgeon, in 1562 demonstrated that a malignant (pestilential) fever, then raging in L’Agenois, was due to the putrid vapors arising from a neighboring well into which many dead bodies, soldiers fallen in battle, had been thrown.
Raulin (Observ. de Med.) relates how the section of a corpse at Leicturm, in the plain of Armagnac, caused a frightful epidemic.
A terrible pestilence, which decimated especially the lower classes, was originated in Riorno (Auvergne) by the digging up of the ground of an old cemetery, done to beautify the city.
Jean Wolf, who reported upon an epidemic of malignant fever in 1731, attributed it to putrefying animal remains.
In 1752 a man who had died of small-pox 30 years ago was dug up in Chelwood, a village near London, England. He had been buried in an oaken coffin which, when taken up, was yet entire and could have been so removed from the grave. But because the grave-digger could not handle it properly he got impatient and beat in the cover of the casket with his spade, whereupon immediately a mephitic smell arose that filled the air to some distance. The corpse, which was to be deposited in a vault, had been a person of consequence, and therefore not only the inhabitants of his native village attended the exhumation, but a good many people from neighboring places. But a few days after 14 113persons contracted small-pox, and within a short time the entire village was infected, only two individuals enjoying immunity318 because they had had the disease. Although the epidemic was of a light character, two persons died of it. All those in the surrounding villages who had been at the exhumation were also attacked by small-pox.
Riecke adduces analogous319 cases, and relates that the opening of a vault which contained a victim of small-pox was followed by the death of a workman and the infection of another person.
Maret is authority for the following statement: A fever, complicated by gastric320 and catarrhal disorders321, was prevalent in 1773 at Saulieu, Burgundy; but few of those it attacked died. This was in the latter part of February. On the 3d of March, a corpulent body, a victim of the disease, was buried in the cathedral, and on the 20th of April following, very near to the first, that of a woman who, in child-bed, had succumbed to the fever. Maret reports that when the coffin was lowered into the vault, the ropes slipped from the grasp of the men who held them; the coffin fell to the ground and broke; a putrid fluid, that filled the church with a most nauseating322 odor, oozed323 from it. Of 170 persons who remained in the church from the time that the grave was opened until the conclusion of the ceremony, 149 were attacked by a malignant putrid fever, which, bearing many of the characteristics of the prevalent fever, was undoubtedly the result of the vitiation of the church.
The city of Tacna, Peru, was yearly visited at certain times by a pernicious fever, which caused many deaths. The cemetery was in the center of the city. Finally, 114the dead were buried outside of the city limits, and the fever disappeared.
During the month of March, 1781, and the half-year preceding it, an epidemic raged at Pasajes, Spain, which befell 127 persons, of which number 83 died. This epidemic was attributed to the poisonous vapors arising from the overcrowded vaults of the parish church.
Trousseau mentions the case of a grave-digger who was attacked by small-pox soon after opening the grave of an individual who had died of that malady325 many years ago.
Mr. Cooper charged an outbreak of small-pox in Eyam, Derbyshire, Eng., to the excavation of an old cemetery.
A dispatch from Montreal, dated Oct. 26, 1885, states that a grave-digger of St. Sulpice, named Robitaille, made a grave next to where a man who died from small-pox a month ago was buried. At the time there was no small-pox in the village; but Robitaille, some days after digging the grave, sickened and finally died of small-pox, making it evident that he contracted the disease from the body of a man who had been buried for a month.
Recent scientific discoveries confirm the opinion long held by persons endowed with common sense that the germs of many infectious and contagious diseases retain their vitality and the power to spread the respective malady in the grave and the layers of earth surrounding it. By means of these germs, yellow fever, cholera, small-pox, splenic fever, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and other diseases belonging to the same category, can be communicated from the dead to the living, even years after burial. Concerning splenic fever, which can be 115transmitted from animal to man, the great French investigator326 and pathologist, Louis Pasteur, says:—
“Recently, we discovered the characteristic germs in pits in which animals dead of splenic fever (charbon) had been buried for 12 years; and their culture was as virulent as that from the blood of an animal recently dead. Anthracoid germs in the earth of pits in which animals have been buried are brought to the surface by earthworms; and in this fact we may find the whole etiology of the disease, inasmuch as the animals swallow these germs with their food.”
The British Medical Journal in 1880 commented on Pasteur’s great discovery as follows:—
“Pasteur’s recent researches on the etiology of ‘charbon’ shows that this earth-mould positively327 contains the specific germs which propagate the disease, and that the same specific germs are found within the intestines328 of the worms. The parasitic329 organism, or bacteridium, which, inoculated330 from a diseased to a healthy animal, propagates the specific disease, may be destroyed by putrefaction after burial. But before this process has been completed, germs or spores331 may have been formed which will resist the putrefactive process for many years, and lie in a condition of latent life, like a grain of corn, or any flower-seed, ready to germinate332 and communicate the specific disease. In a field in the Jura, where a diseased cow had been buried two years before at a depth of nearly seven feet, the surface earth not having been disturbed in the interval333, Pasteur found that the mould contained germs which, introduced by inoculation334 into a guinea-pig, produced charbon and death. Further, if a worm be taken from an infected spot, the earth in the alimentary335 canal of the 116worm contains these spores or germs of charbon, which, inoculated, propagate the disease; and the mould deposited on the surface by the worm, when dried into dust, is blown over the grass and plants on which the cattle feed, and may thus spread the disease. After various farming operations of tilling and harvest, Pasteur has found the germs just over the graves of the diseased cattle, but not to any great distance. After rains or morning dews the germs of charbon, with a quantity of other germs, were found about the neighboring plants; and Pasteur says that in cemeteries it is very possible that germs capable of propagating specific diseases of different kinds quite harmless to the earthworm may be carried to the surface of the soil, ready to cause disease in the proper animals. The practical inferences in favor of cremation are so strong that, in Pasteur’s words, they ‘need not be enforced.’”
FURNACE OF THE BUFFALO336 CREMATORIUM.
(Venini system.)
Sir T. Spencer Wells pointed out, in his paper read 117before the British Medical Association, in August, 1880, that the observations of Darwin, “on the formation of mould,” made more than 40 years ago, when he was a young man, are curiously337 confirmatory of the conclusions of Pasteur. In Darwin’s paper, read at the Geological Society of London, in 1837, he proved that, in old pasture-land, every particle of the superficial layer of earth, overlying different kinds of subsoil, has passed through the intestines of earthworms. The worms swallowed earthy matter, and, after separating the digestible or serviceable portion, they eject the remainder in little coils or heaps at the mouths of their burrows. In dry weather the worm descends338 to a considerable depth, and brings up to the surface the particles which it ejects. This agency of earthworms is not so trivial as it might appear. By observation in different fields, Mr. Darwin proved, in one case, that a depth of more than three inches of this worm-mould had been accumulated in 15 years; and, in another, that the earthworms had covered a bed of marl with their mould, in 18 years, to an average depth of 13 inches.
Professor Klebs, of Prague, Bohemia, discovered the bacteria of malarial339 fever. They were called by him bacilli malari?. His discovery was verified by Prof. Tomassi Crudelli, of Rome, Italy.
Dr. Robert Koch, of the Imperial Sanitary Bureau at Berlin, Germany, detected the bacillus tuberculosis340; there is no doubt, to my mind, but that consumption can possibly be spread by the upturning of the soil of a grave containing the victim of tuberculosis.
The same gentleman, now professor in Berlin University, discovered the comma bacillus of cholera. He 118expressed his belief in its propagation in the grave, especially when the latter is moist.
Houlier and Feruel are responsible for the statement that, during the prevalence of the plague in Paris in the beginning of the 18th century, the disease lingered longest and was the most severe in the vicinity of the “cimetière de la Trinité.”
The Detroit Evening News, of Sept. 23, 1886, reports the following case in which diphtheria was contracted from a corpse:—
“Blanche Hunt, a 12-year old girl, died at Albion of malignant diphtheria last week. Sophie Calkins, aged324 13, died at Fair Haven341, Vt., of the same disease, contracted the week before at Albion. There are no other cases in town, and these two girls are supposed to have taken the disease at the cemetery, where they went into the vault containing the remains of a woman sent there from abroad, who had died from what the physicians called black jaundice. It is believed her disease was really diphtheria.”
As early as 1878, the Massachusetts State Board of Health—one of the best in the world—showed that diphtheria is originated and diffused by the emanations of victims of that disease.
In 1875 the same high authority had reached similar conclusions regarding typhoid fever.
There is much evidence to show that cholera was repeatedly caused by the excavation of the graves of those who had died of the disease, and that it raged with special violence in the vicinity of cemeteries.
Dr. Sutherland attested342 the fact that cholera was unusually prevalent in the immediate177 neighborhood of London graveyards. This, however, need not astonish 119us, when we consider that the soil of churchyards in some of the poorer districts in London was raised two, three, or even four feet in a few years. The great prevalence of epidemic diseases in some parts of the city finally led to the formation of the Epidemiological Society of London, under the presidency343 of Dr. Babington.
When the cholera visited London in 1854, Mr. Simon asserted that if the soil of the cemeteries in which the plague-stricken of 1665 were buried would be upturned, it would make the prevailing scourge344 more virulent. It was done in spite of his warning, and his prediction was verified.
In 1826, when cholera made its appearance in Egypt, the French government sent out medical officers to discover, if possible, its origin. It was traced to an old and disused cemetery at Kelioub, a village near Cairo.
The outbreak of cholera at Modena, Italy, in 1828, was shown by Professor Bianchi to be due to the upturning of the ground of burial-yards in which victims of the plague had been inhumed 300 years before.
Nov. 12, 1836, Miaulis, the adjutant of Otto the First, of Greece, was attacked by cholera, of which he finally died. The body was given in charge of three men, who also assisted at the post-mortem examination. On the third day after the funeral of the adjutant, one of the men, Jacob Kuehnlein, 72 years of age, was taken ill, and died the following day. The autopsy345 proved the disease to be Asiatic cholera. Three days after Kuehnlein’s burial, the second of the men who had guarded Miaulis’ remains, J. Stroehlein by name, aged 48, was stricken down by the cholera, to which he succumbed within two days.
120Schauenburg (Cholera, etc., Wuerzburg, 1874, p. 8) gives it as his opinion that decomposition is favorable to the development of cholera germs, which means the propagation of the comma bacillus.
The Italians do not only stand at the head of the cremation movement to-day, but they recognized the value of that sure and never-failing germicide—fire—as early as 1837; in that year thousands of the victims of the cholera epidemic, then raging in Italy, were burned on the seashore at Palermo.
The report of the London Board of Health for 1849 directs attention to the fact that the cholera was especially prevalent and fatal in the neighborhood of graveyards. This, however, need not cause any surprise, as the London Athen?um, to this day one of the most reliable journals of the United Kingdom, states in 1850 that, during the prevalence of the scourge, 500 bodies, dead of cholera, were daily interred, in addition to those of other diseases.
Professor Jaccoud, of the faculty346 of medicine of the University of Paris, claims, in his “Pathologie Interne,” that there are three ways of transmission of cholera, of which the third is by corpses.
An employee of the French marine347 hospital at Therapia, near Constantinople, was present at the autopsy of Marshal Saint Armand, who had died of cholera, which was held in the amphitheatre of the institution. A few days after the man succumbed to a severe attack of de choléra foudroyant, which he had contracted at the post-mortem examination.
Dr. F. Bidlot, of Liege, Belgium, states that, in 1867, he was called to a robust cholera patient who, when asked about the cause of his illness, said that until 121noon he had worked at the grave of a person, dead of cholera, who had been buried very superficially, since an exhumation was to take place: when the body was disinterred, he was seized by an illness which soon proved to be cholera.
The following case was also reported by Dr. Bidlot. A nun162 who had nursed cholera patients in a hospital died of the dread disease in the summer of 1860. At 10 A.M. in the latter part of October she was exhumed. At four o’clock in the forenoon of the same day Dr. Bidlot was called to Dr. Romiée, who had attended the disinterment. He was found to be suffering from cholera, and declared that his illness was owing to his exposure to the emanations of the body dug up.
Trinity Church graveyard, at New York, was the center of very fatal prevalence of cholera at every visit of that pest from 1832 to 1854.
Dr. Rauch relates (Intra-Mural Interments in Populous348 Cities, Chicago, 1868) how the cholera was spread in Burlington, Ia., in 1850. Not a single death took place in the vicinity of the cemetery of the city, until 20 persons, deceased of cholera, had been interred therein; then one case after another occurred, till the epidemic became truly alarming.
In 1865, when a cholera epidemic invaded Paris, France, it raged with great virulence in the old quarter of Montmartre; in that part of the metropolis there was a vast burial-ground, from which toxic vapors were continually escaping. Of 5000 victims of the epidemic, 1800 belonged to this ancient community. The great mortality in this quarter of the city was no doubt due to the presence of the overcrowded cemetery.
Dr. John Murray, inspector-general of hospitals in 122Bengal, India, wrote a book, in which he endeavored to determine whether or not cholera can be propagated by human remains. He declares emphatically (Propagation of Cholera, 1873, p. 216), that the body of a cholera patient, dead or alive, must be regarded as an agent of transmission of the disease; and adduces the sequent facts to prove his assertion. Several women, whose business it was to lay out corpses, had contracted cholera. In 1818 a man died of the dread disease; five fellow-men, who carried his body to the last resting-place, were taken down with cholera, and died in the night after the burial. Dr. Townsend reported that, in 1869, three men were commissioned by the police to carry a corpse to Dumwahi. The day following their arrival the cholera appeared in this city, and the first to die of the scourge were the three who had borne the corpse.
Cholera from time to time threatens to invade our peaceful land. When it comes, shall we, in view of what has just been shown, bury its victims, saturate125 the earth with its specific germs, which, if the grave should ever be disturbed, may breed a terrible pestilence, if not during our lifetime, yet surely during that of our descendants? There can be but one answer: To secure ourselves against a repetition of epidemics, we must burn our dead; it is a duty that cannot be evaded349, that we owe to all mankind, that, when sinned against, as it has been in the past, is revenged by the resulting visitation.
When the cases above related are taken into consideration, even the most vehement350 anti-cremationist cannot deny that the specific germs of infectious and contagious diseases are propagated by earth-burial, and that the only sure medium for their destruction is fire, 123for no disease germ can pass through the rosy351 heat of the crematory and survive to propagate its species.
FURNACE OF THE CINCINNATI CREMATORIUM.
(Designed by M R. Conway.)
The scientific world was lately startled by the gladsome news that Dr. Domingo Freire, a physician of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, had discovered the peculiar microbe of yellow fever. The blood of yellow fever patients swarms352 with these microbes (cryptococci), which, by inoculation, produce the disease in animals. Dr. Freire named the microbe cryptococcus xanthogenicus. He was aided in his labors353, to detect the specific germ 124of yellow fever, which included microscopic354 and spectroscopic examinations as well as experiments on animals, by his able assistant, Se?or Menezes Doria.
Dr. Freire also examined some soil from the cemetery of Jurujuba, where victims of the yellow jack355 (as we call this fever sometimes) lie interred. Some of this earth was dried and then placed in a cage which contained a guinea pig. Previously to the introduction of the earth, the blood of the animal was examined microscopically356, and found to contain no bacteria of any kind. The animal became ill, and died within five days. When its tissues were examined after death, they were found to present all the characteristic changes which yellow fever brings about. The blood was full of cryptococci xanthogenici in various degrees of development. The urine was highly albuminous. The brain and the intestines were stained yellow by the infiltration of the coloring matter of the cryptococci. After this discovery, the doctor recommended that all victims of yellow fever be destroyed by fire, to prevent general infection. The Brazilian government (one of the most enlightened in the world) immediately ordered that a cremation furnace be built at Jurujuba, in which all those that die of yellow fever there must be incinerated.
The St. Louis Medical and Surgical357 Journal makes this very sensible suggestion regarding the disposition of the remains of those dying of yellow fever in our own United States. It says:—
“From what we have learned from private sources, the resurrection of the bodies, during the winter months, of those who died of yellow fever, has done much to perpetuate358 this terrible disease in southern cities, until 125the warm weather has set in. Cremation obviates359 all possible harm that can come from the dead, and duty to the living demands that everything be done to destroy the possibility of propagating this and all contagious diseases that run so malignant a course.”
Dr. J. F. A. Adams says:—
“Dr. Joseph Akerly expressed the belief that Trinity Churchyard had been an active cause of the yellow fever in New York in 1822, aggravating360 the malignity361 of the epidemic in its vicinity. This church was built in 1698, and the ground had been receiving the dead for 124 years. Sometimes bodies were buried only 18 inches below the surface, and it was impossible to dig without disturbing the remains. During the Revolutionary War, this burial-ground had emitted pestilential odors, and in 1781 Hessian soldiers were employed to cover the ground with a layer of earth two or three feet in depth. The ground was unusually offensive in 1782, and annoyed passengers on the surrounding streets previous to the appearance of the yellow fever in July. During the epidemic, the condition of this churchyard, and the virulence of the disease in its vicinity, called for some active measures, and on the night of Sept. 22 Dr. Roosa covered the ground with 52 casks of quicklime, the stench being at the time so excessive as to cause several laborers362 to vomit363. On the 25th and 26th of the same month St. Paul’s Churchyard, and the vaults of the North Dutch Church in William Street, received the same treatment, these being likewise very offensive and foci of epidemics.”
When the yellow fever raged in New Orleans in 1853, the death-rate in the Fourth District (in which there 126were three large burial-grounds) was 452 per 1000 of the population.
Dr. Bryant, writing on yellow fever at Norfolk in 1855, regards cemeteries as a constant source of danger in an epidemic, and urges the total forbidding of intramural or even near-by suburban364 cemeteries.
Sir Spencer Wells related a fact recently at a meeting of the Health Exhibition in London, England, which has a strong bearing on the source of epidemics and their annihilation by cremation. Some persons who had died of scarlet fever were interred in a country graveyard. Thirty years afterward365 the cemetery was included in a neighboring garden, and the old graves dug up. Scarlet fever forthwith broke out in the rectory and parish, and no other probable source having been discovered, it is impossible to avoid the inference that the germs of scarlatinal infection can retain their vitality a third of a century.
In epidemics individuals should be forced to allow their dead (unless they succumb179 to some disease other than the prevailing scourge) to be cremated366. To stamp out a contagious or infectious malady, or to arrest its progress, incineration must be made general; its benefits are nil367 when confined to isolated cases. The individual must stand back when the public health is in jeopardy368.
Governments should not allow bodies to be introduced into their respective countries from an infected land, unless such bodies have been previously reduced to ashes.
Thousands of cases of malignant sickness, I have no doubt, could be prevented by the prompt introduction of cremation. Why not, then, introduce it? Simply 127because there is an unreasonable369 prejudice against the custom? It is ridiculous! Should any mere prejudice stand in the way of a sanitary reform? I leave it to any sound mind to decide the question. I am not advocating obligatory370 incineration in times of peace except in cases of infectious and contagious disease. I would rejoice to see it generally introduced, but not by force. Cremation, moreover, needs not the aid of the sword or law; it will find its way unassisted.
Besides human and animal remains, I think all garbage should be destroyed by fire.
The idea of cremation which, carried by the wings of enthusiasm, traversed the whole civilized371 world in the spring of 1874, is really naught but a demand of hygiene in favor of our own health. Not only physicians, but also laymen372, should enter the arena373 where the great fight between earth-burial and cremation is going on, and combat for glorious incineration.
The International Medical Congress which convened374 at Florence, Italy, in 1869 examined into the various methods of burial, and concluded by expressing its belief that cremation was necessary, and should be adopted in the interest of civilization and public health.
Dr. C. W. Purdy, of Chicago, Ill., says: “Burial-grounds are unquestionably ruinous to health, as both theory and facts amply demonstrate; many sections of population suffer annually disease and death which are exposed to their influences; all engaged in this unwholesome system suffer—the grave-diggers, the gardeners, the men who repair the vaults and tombstones, the friends who visit the graves, and the whole funeral procession are exposed directly. There is no redeeming375 128feature about this burial system, degrading to the dead and dangerous to the living.”
The celebrated376 medical author, Moleschott, even more vehemently377 condemns378 cemeteries. He claims that they emit a vapor which causes malignant fevers, and concludes his remarks by calling them “workshops and factories of the devil.”
Beyond a doubt, cremation soonest places the bodies of the dead in a condition where they can do the least harm to the living. Incineration destroys all disease germs and at once removes all possibility of the contamination of air and water by the dead.
Then why not introduce cremation and do away with all the evils described in this chapter? It is of no consequence to the dead, whether they rot in the earth and originate miasma, or are transformed by fire into pure white ashes. They feel as little of the process of decay as they do of the flame; their eye is surrounded by the same darkness, whether they are down in the deep grave or in the glowing light of the crematory furnace. But it is of the greatest consequence to us, the living; and the only way to protect ourselves from poisonous infection by our dead is to burn them.
点击收听单词发音
1 emblem | |
n.象征,标志;徽章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 droops | |
弯曲或下垂,发蔫( droop的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 fragrant | |
adj.芬香的,馥郁的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 perch | |
n.栖木,高位,杆;v.栖息,就位,位于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 elevation | |
n.高度;海拔;高地;上升;提高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 foliage | |
n.叶子,树叶,簇叶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 par | |
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 rev | |
v.发动机旋转,加快速度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 reverently | |
adv.虔诚地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 naught | |
n.无,零 [=nought] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lodgings | |
n. 出租的房舍, 寄宿舍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 decomposition | |
n. 分解, 腐烂, 崩溃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 cremation | |
n.火葬,火化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 horrid | |
adj.可怕的;令人惊恐的;恐怖的;极讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 urn | |
n.(有座脚的)瓮;坟墓;骨灰瓮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 infancy | |
n.婴儿期;幼年期;初期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 percolates | |
v.滤( percolate的第三人称单数 );渗透;(思想等)渗透;渗入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 dread | |
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 repulsive | |
adj.排斥的,使人反感的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 awakened | |
v.(使)醒( awaken的过去式和过去分词 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 strew | |
vt.撒;使散落;撒在…上,散布于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 cumber | |
v.拖累,妨碍;n.妨害;拖累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 Oxford | |
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 metaphorically | |
adv. 用比喻地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 coffin | |
n.棺材,灵柩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 muster | |
v.集合,收集,鼓起,激起;n.集合,检阅,集合人员,点名册 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 porous | |
adj.可渗透的,多孔的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 corpse | |
n.尸体,死尸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 foul | |
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 putrefaction | |
n.腐坏,腐败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 pestilence | |
n.瘟疫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 calamities | |
n.灾祸,灾难( calamity的名词复数 );不幸之事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 cemeteries | |
n.(非教堂的)墓地,公墓( cemetery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 deferred | |
adj.延期的,缓召的v.拖延,延缓,推迟( defer的过去式和过去分词 );服从某人的意愿,遵从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 constituents | |
n.选民( constituent的名词复数 );成分;构成部分;要素 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 fraught | |
adj.充满…的,伴有(危险等)的;忧虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 combustion | |
n.燃烧;氧化;骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 sodium | |
n.(化)钠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 calcium | |
n.钙(化学符号Ca) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 magnesium | |
n.镁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 silicon | |
n.硅(旧名矽) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 atmospheric | |
adj.大气的,空气的;大气层的;大气所引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 crumble | |
vi.碎裂,崩溃;vt.弄碎,摧毁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 mingle | |
vt.使混合,使相混;vi.混合起来;相交往 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 shudder | |
v.战粟,震动,剧烈地摇晃;n.战粟,抖动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 shuddering | |
v.战栗( shudder的现在分词 );发抖;(机器、车辆等)突然震动;颤动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 assails | |
v.攻击( assail的第三人称单数 );困扰;质问;毅然应对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 nostrils | |
鼻孔( nostril的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 shaft | |
n.(工具的)柄,杆状物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 putrid | |
adj.腐臭的;有毒的;已腐烂的;卑劣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 revelling | |
v.作乐( revel的现在分词 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 embedded | |
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 waxy | |
adj.苍白的;光滑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 cemetery | |
n.坟墓,墓地,坟场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 interred | |
v.埋,葬( inter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 graveyard | |
n.坟场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 gravel | |
n.砂跞;砂砾层;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 corpses | |
n.死尸,尸体( corpse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 decompose | |
vi.分解;vt.(使)腐败,(使)腐烂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 decomposed | |
已分解的,已腐烂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 coffins | |
n.棺材( coffin的名词复数 );使某人早亡[死,完蛋,垮台等]之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 shuddered | |
v.战栗( shudder的过去式和过去分词 );发抖;(机器、车辆等)突然震动;颤动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 superfluous | |
adj.过多的,过剩的,多余的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 stifling | |
a.令人窒息的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 oxide | |
n.氧化物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 permeates | |
弥漫( permeate的第三人称单数 ); 遍布; 渗入; 渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 saturation | |
n.饱和(状态);浸透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 annually | |
adv.一年一次,每年 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 graveyards | |
墓地( graveyard的名词复数 ); 垃圾场; 废物堆积处; 收容所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 dense | |
a.密集的,稠密的,浓密的;密度大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 sanitary | |
adj.卫生方面的,卫生的,清洁的,卫生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 postpone | |
v.延期,推迟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 encumber | |
v.阻碍行动,妨碍,堆满 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 virulent | |
adj.有毒的,有恶意的,充满敌意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 entailing | |
使…成为必要( entail的现在分词 ); 需要; 限定继承; 使必需 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 mowed | |
v.刈,割( mow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 proximity | |
n.接近,邻近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 epidemic | |
n.流行病;盛行;adj.流行性的,流传极广的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 trenches | |
深沟,地沟( trench的名词复数 ); 战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 trench | |
n./v.(挖)沟,(挖)战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 commissioner | |
n.(政府厅、局、处等部门)专员,长官,委员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 roe | |
n.鱼卵;獐鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 baker | |
n.面包师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 whitewashed | |
粉饰,美化,掩饰( whitewash的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 vault | |
n.拱形圆顶,地窖,地下室 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 reeks | |
n.恶臭( reek的名词复数 )v.发出浓烈的臭气( reek的第三人称单数 );散发臭气;发出难闻的气味 (of sth);明显带有(令人不快或生疑的跡象) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 abolition | |
n.废除,取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 missionary | |
adj.教会的,传教(士)的;n.传教士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 vaults | |
n.拱顶( vault的名词复数 );地下室;撑物跳高;墓穴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 cholera | |
n.霍乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 consigned | |
v.把…置于(令人不快的境地)( consign的过去式和过去分词 );把…托付给;把…托人代售;丟弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 devouring | |
吞没( devour的现在分词 ); 耗尽; 津津有味地看; 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 shameful | |
adj.可耻的,不道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 metropolis | |
n.首府;大城市 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 grievances | |
n.委屈( grievance的名词复数 );苦衷;不满;牢骚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 pacified | |
使(某人)安静( pacify的过去式和过去分词 ); 息怒; 抚慰; 在(有战争的地区、国家等)实现和平 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 saturated | |
a.饱和的,充满的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 saturate | |
vt.使湿透,浸透;使充满,使饱和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 cadaver | |
n.尸体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 cadavers | |
n.尸体( cadaver的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 enact | |
vt.制定(法律);上演,扮演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 exhaled | |
v.呼出,发散出( exhale的过去式和过去分词 );吐出(肺中的空气、烟等),呼气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 superstition | |
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 exhumation | |
n.掘尸,发掘;剥璐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 appalling | |
adj.骇人听闻的,令人震惊的,可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 myriads | |
n.无数,极大数量( myriad的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 dwellings | |
n.住处,处所( dwelling的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 paupers | |
n.穷人( pauper的名词复数 );贫民;贫穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 brook | |
n.小河,溪;v.忍受,容让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 prevailing | |
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 swells | |
增强( swell的第三人称单数 ); 肿胀; (使)凸出; 充满(激情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 ribs | |
n.肋骨( rib的名词复数 );(船或屋顶等的)肋拱;肋骨状的东西;(织物的)凸条花纹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 memento | |
n.纪念品,令人回忆的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 scorching | |
adj. 灼热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 strand | |
vt.使(船)搁浅,使(某人)困于(某地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 lurking | |
潜在 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 vapors | |
n.水汽,水蒸气,无实质之物( vapor的名词复数 );自夸者;幻想 [药]吸入剂 [古]忧郁(症)v.自夸,(使)蒸发( vapor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 vapor | |
n.蒸汽,雾气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 arsenic | |
n.砒霜,砷;adj.砷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 malignant | |
adj.恶性的,致命的;恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 burrows | |
n.地洞( burrow的名词复数 )v.挖掘(洞穴),挖洞( burrow的第三人称单数 );翻寻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 diffuses | |
(使光)模糊,漫射,漫散( diffuse的第三人称单数 ); (使)扩散; (使)弥漫; (使)传播 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 porousness | |
多孔性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 conducive | |
adj.有益的,有助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 obviated | |
v.避免,消除(贫困、不方便等)( obviate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 diffused | |
散布的,普及的,扩散的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 impede | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 miasma | |
n.毒气;不良气氛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 inhaling | |
v.吸入( inhale的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 avaricious | |
adj.贪婪的,贪心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 descending | |
n. 下行 adj. 下降的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 inundation | |
n.the act or fact of overflowing | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 nun | |
n.修女,尼姑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 stagnant | |
adj.不流动的,停滞的,不景气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 regenerated | |
v.新生,再生( regenerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 tract | |
n.传单,小册子,大片(土地或森林) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 swollen | |
adj.肿大的,水涨的;v.使变大,肿胀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 lethal | |
adj.致死的;毁灭性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 noxious | |
adj.有害的,有毒的;使道德败坏的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 hygiene | |
n.健康法,卫生学 (a.hygienic) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 teem | |
vi.(with)充满,多产 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 monk | |
n.和尚,僧侣,修道士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 penitent | |
adj.后悔的;n.后悔者;忏悔者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 exhumed | |
v.挖出,发掘出( exhume的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 dame | |
n.女士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 descended | |
a.为...后裔的,出身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 suffocation | |
n.窒息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 succumbed | |
不再抵抗(诱惑、疾病、攻击等)( succumb的过去式和过去分词 ); 屈从; 被压垮; 死 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 succumb | |
v.屈服,屈从;死 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 unbearable | |
adj.不能容忍的;忍受不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 edifice | |
n.宏伟的建筑物(如宫殿,教室) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 beset | |
v.镶嵌;困扰,包围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 vocation | |
n.职业,行业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 seeped | |
v.(液体)渗( seep的过去式和过去分词 );渗透;渗出;漏出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 decomposing | |
腐烂( decompose的现在分词 ); (使)分解; 分解(某物质、光线等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 respiration | |
n.呼吸作用;一次呼吸;植物光合作用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 inhaled | |
v.吸入( inhale的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 olfactory | |
adj.嗅觉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 penetrating | |
adj.(声音)响亮的,尖锐的adj.(气味)刺激的adj.(思想)敏锐的,有洞察力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 nausea | |
n.作呕,恶心;极端的憎恶(或厌恶) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 languor | |
n.无精力,倦怠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 incurred | |
[医]招致的,遭受的; incur的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 impurity | |
n.不洁,不纯,杂质 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 deteriorate | |
v.变坏;恶化;退化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 diluted | |
无力的,冲淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 interferes | |
vi. 妨碍,冲突,干涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 gasping | |
adj. 气喘的, 痉挛的 动词gasp的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 lessened | |
减少的,减弱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 suffocating | |
a.使人窒息的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 cadaveric | |
尸体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 abounding | |
adj.丰富的,大量的v.大量存在,充满,富于( abound的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 defunct | |
adj.死亡的;已倒闭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 survivors | |
幸存者,残存者,生还者( survivor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 philosophic | |
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 robust | |
adj.强壮的,强健的,粗野的,需要体力的,浓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 oration | |
n.演说,致辞,叙述法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 toxic | |
adj.有毒的,因中毒引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 premature | |
adj.比预期时间早的;不成熟的,仓促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 aristocrat | |
n.贵族,有贵族气派的人,上层人物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 excavation | |
n.挖掘,发掘;被挖掘之地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 disturbance | |
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 manure | |
n.粪,肥,肥粒;vt.施肥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 measles | |
n.麻疹,风疹,包虫病,痧子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 scarlet | |
n.深红色,绯红色,红衣;adj.绯红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 eruptions | |
n.喷发,爆发( eruption的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 mischief | |
n.损害,伤害,危害;恶作剧,捣蛋,胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 obese | |
adj.过度肥胖的,肥大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 demise | |
n.死亡;v.让渡,遗赠,转让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 aridity | |
n.干旱,乏味;干燥性;荒芜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 consecrated | |
adj.神圣的,被视为神圣的v.把…奉为神圣,给…祝圣( consecrate的过去式和过去分词 );奉献 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 imprisoned | |
下狱,监禁( imprison的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 incarcerated | |
钳闭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 chalice | |
n.圣餐杯;金杯毒酒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 liberated | |
a.无拘束的,放纵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 ashore | |
adv.在(向)岸上,上岸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 penetrate | |
v.透(渗)入;刺入,刺穿;洞察,了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 penetrated | |
adj. 击穿的,鞭辟入里的 动词penetrate的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 infiltration | |
n.渗透;下渗;渗滤;入渗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 impervious | |
adj.不能渗透的,不能穿过的,不易伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 radius | |
n.半径,半径范围;有效航程,范围,界限 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 watershed | |
n.转折点,分水岭,分界线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 plausibility | |
n. 似有道理, 能言善辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 encroachment | |
n.侵入,蚕食 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 brackish | |
adj.混有盐的;咸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 impurities | |
不纯( impurity的名词复数 ); 不洁; 淫秽; 杂质 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 beverage | |
n.(水,酒等之外的)饮料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 prostrated | |
v.使俯伏,使拜倒( prostrate的过去式和过去分词 );(指疾病、天气等)使某人无能为力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 virulence | |
n.毒力,毒性;病毒性;致病力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 epidemics | |
n.流行病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 prosper | |
v.成功,兴隆,昌盛;使成功,使昌隆,繁荣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 pertaining | |
与…有关系的,附属…的,为…固有的(to) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 surmounted | |
战胜( surmount的过去式和过去分词 ); 克服(困难); 居于…之上; 在…顶上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 percolating | |
n.渗透v.滤( percolate的现在分词 );渗透;(思想等)渗透;渗入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 oozing | |
v.(浓液等)慢慢地冒出,渗出( ooze的现在分词 );使(液体)缓缓流出;(浓液)渗出,慢慢流出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 contagious | |
adj.传染性的,有感染力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 casements | |
n.窗扉( casement的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 rends | |
v.撕碎( rend的第三人称单数 );分裂;(因愤怒、痛苦等而)揪扯(衣服或头发等);(声音等)刺破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 graceful | |
adj.优美的,优雅的;得体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 invalids | |
病人,残疾者( invalid的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 amazement | |
n.惊奇,惊讶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 percolated | |
v.滤( percolate的过去式和过去分词 );渗透;(思想等)渗透;渗入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 ancestry | |
n.祖先,家世 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 deplore | |
vt.哀叹,对...深感遗憾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 advent | |
n.(重要事件等的)到来,来临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 vampire | |
n.吸血鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 sewer | |
n.排水沟,下水道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 quaff | |
v.一饮而尽;痛饮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 distilled | |
adj.由蒸馏得来的v.蒸馏( distil的过去式和过去分词 );从…提取精华 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 pertinently | |
适切地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 jersey | |
n.运动衫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 fatality | |
n.不幸,灾祸,天命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 impure | |
adj.不纯净的,不洁的;不道德的,下流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 analyzed | |
v.分析( analyze的过去式和过去分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 tainted | |
adj.腐坏的;污染的;沾污的;感染的v.使变质( taint的过去式和过去分词 );使污染;败坏;被污染,腐坏,败坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 bacterial | |
a.细菌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 swarm | |
n.(昆虫)等一大群;vi.成群飞舞;蜂拥而入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 filthy | |
adj.卑劣的;恶劣的,肮脏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 delusion | |
n.谬见,欺骗,幻觉,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 scruples | |
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 revered | |
v.崇敬,尊崇,敬畏( revere的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 criticise | |
v.批评,评论;非难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 infiltrated | |
adj.[医]浸润的v.(使)渗透,(指思想)渗入人的心中( infiltrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 superintendent | |
n.监督人,主管,总监;(英国)警务长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 sewers | |
n.阴沟,污水管,下水道( sewer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 inspector | |
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 transpired | |
(事实,秘密等)被人知道( transpire的过去式和过去分词 ); 泄露; 显露; 发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 insufficient | |
adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 monograph | |
n.专题文章,专题著作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 nay | |
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 contagion | |
n.(通过接触的疾病)传染;蔓延 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 buck | |
n.雄鹿,雄兔;v.马离地跳跃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 vitality | |
n.活力,生命力,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 sprout | |
n.芽,萌芽;vt.使发芽,摘去芽;vi.长芽,抽条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 dormant | |
adj.暂停活动的;休眠的;潜伏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 shun | |
vt.避开,回避,避免 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 saturating | |
浸湿,浸透( saturate的现在分词 ); 使…大量吸收或充满某物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 pithily | |
adv.有力地,简洁地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 potent | |
adj.强有力的,有权势的;有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 illustrates | |
给…加插图( illustrate的第三人称单数 ); 说明; 表明; (用示例、图画等)说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 renowned | |
adj.著名的,有名望的,声誉鹊起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 immunity | |
n.优惠;免除;豁免,豁免权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 analogous | |
adj.相似的;类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 gastric | |
adj.胃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 disorders | |
n.混乱( disorder的名词复数 );凌乱;骚乱;(身心、机能)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 nauseating | |
adj.令人恶心的,使人厌恶的v.使恶心,作呕( nauseate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 oozed | |
v.(浓液等)慢慢地冒出,渗出( ooze的过去式和过去分词 );使(液体)缓缓流出;(浓液)渗出,慢慢流出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 aged | |
adj.年老的,陈年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 malady | |
n.病,疾病(通常做比喻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 investigator | |
n.研究者,调查者,审查者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 intestines | |
n.肠( intestine的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 parasitic | |
adj.寄生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 inoculated | |
v.给…做预防注射( inoculate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 spores | |
n.(细菌、苔藓、蕨类植物)孢子( spore的名词复数 )v.(细菌、苔藓、蕨类植物)孢子( spore的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 germinate | |
v.发芽;发生;发展 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 interval | |
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 inoculation | |
n.接芽;预防接种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 alimentary | |
adj.饮食的,营养的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 buffalo | |
n.(北美)野牛;(亚洲)水牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338 descends | |
v.下来( descend的第三人称单数 );下去;下降;下斜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339 malarial | |
患疟疾的,毒气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340 tuberculosis | |
n.结核病,肺结核 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341 haven | |
n.安全的地方,避难所,庇护所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342 attested | |
adj.经检验证明无病的,经检验证明无菌的v.证明( attest的过去式和过去分词 );证实;声称…属实;使宣誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344 scourge | |
n.灾难,祸害;v.蹂躏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345 autopsy | |
n.尸体解剖;尸检 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347 marine | |
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348 populous | |
adj.人口稠密的,人口众多的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349 evaded | |
逃避( evade的过去式和过去分词 ); 避开; 回避; 想不出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350 vehement | |
adj.感情强烈的;热烈的;(人)有强烈感情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351 rosy | |
adj.美好的,乐观的,玫瑰色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352 swarms | |
蜂群,一大群( swarm的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353 labors | |
v.努力争取(for)( labor的第三人称单数 );苦干;详细分析;(指引擎)缓慢而困难地运转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354 microscopic | |
adj.微小的,细微的,极小的,显微的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356 microscopically | |
显微镜下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357 surgical | |
adj.外科的,外科医生的,手术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358 perpetuate | |
v.使永存,使永记不忘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359 obviates | |
v.避免,消除(贫困、不方便等)( obviate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360 aggravating | |
adj.恼人的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361 malignity | |
n.极度的恶意,恶毒;(病的)恶性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
362 laborers | |
n.体力劳动者,工人( laborer的名词复数 );(熟练工人的)辅助工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
363 vomit | |
v.呕吐,作呕;n.呕吐物,吐出物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
364 suburban | |
adj.城郊的,在郊区的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
365 afterward | |
adv.后来;以后 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
366 cremated | |
v.火葬,火化(尸体)( cremate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
367 nil | |
n.无,全无,零 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
368 jeopardy | |
n.危险;危难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
369 unreasonable | |
adj.不讲道理的,不合情理的,过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
370 obligatory | |
adj.强制性的,义务的,必须的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
371 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
372 laymen | |
门外汉,外行人( layman的名词复数 ); 普通教徒(有别于神职人员) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
373 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
374 convened | |
召开( convene的过去式 ); 召集; (为正式会议而)聚集; 集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
375 redeeming | |
补偿的,弥补的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
376 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
377 vehemently | |
adv. 热烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
378 condemns | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的第三人称单数 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |