As soon as she did this she went away from her calling, and men turned from her. It was not the errors of the Church which originally caused her ruin, but the fact that by the help of the secular1 power, in the time of Constantine, her ministers violated the law of labour; and then their claim to idleness and luxury gave birth to the errors.
As soon as she obtained this power she began to care for herself, and not for humanity, whom she had taken upon herself to serve. The ministers of the Church gave themselves up to idleness and depravity.
The State took upon itself to guide men's lives. The State promised men justice, peace, security, order, satisfaction of common intellectual and material wants; and, in compensation, men who served the State freed themselves from taking part in the struggle for life. And the State's servants, as soon as they were able to utilize2 other men's labour, acted in the same way as the ministers of the Church.
They had not in view the people; but, from kings down to the lowest state functionaries3, in Rome, as well as in France, England, Russia, and America, they gave themselves over to idleness and depravity. Now men have lost their faith in the state, and anarchy4 is now seriously advocated as an ideal. The state has lost its prestige among men, only because its ministers have claimed the right of utilizing5 the people's labour for themselves.
Science and art have done the same, assisted by the state power which they took upon themselves to sustain. They also have claimed and obtained for themselves the right of idleness and of utilizing other men's labour, and also have been false to their calling. And their errors, too, proceeded only from the fact that their ministers, pointing to a falsely conceived principle of the division of labour, claimed for themselves the right to utilize the work of the people, and so lost the meaning of their calling, making the aim of their activity, not the utility of the people, but some mysterious activity of science and art; and also, like their forerunners6, they have given themselves over to idleness and depravity,
though not so much to a fleshly as to an intellectual corruption7.
It is said that science and art have done much for mankind.
That is quite true.
Church and State have given much to humanity, not because they abused their power, or because their ministers forsook8 the common life of men, and the eternal duty of labour for life—but in spite of this.
The Roman Republic was powerful, not because its citizens were able to lead a life of depravity, but because it could number among them men who were virtuous9.
This is the case with science and art.
Science and art have effected much for mankind, not because their ministers had sometimes formerly10, and have always at present, the possibility of freeing themselves from labour, but because men of genius, not utilizing these rights, have forwarded the progress of mankind.
The class of learned men and artists who claim, on account of a false division of labour, the right of utilizing other men's labour, cannot contribute to the progress of true science and true art, because a lie can never produce a truth.
We are so accustomed to our pampered11 or debilitated12 representatives of intellectual labour, that it would seem very strange if a learned man or an artist were to plough, or cart manure13. We think that, were he to do so, all would go to ruin; that all his wisdom would be shaken out of him, and that the great artistic14 images he carries in his breast would be soiled by the manure: but we are so accustomed to our present conditions that we do not wonder at our ministers of science, that is, ministers and teachers of truth, compelling other people to do for them that which they could very well do themselves, passing half their time eating, smoking, chattering15 in “liberal” gossip, reading newspapers, novels, visiting theatres; we are not surprised to see our philosopher in an inn, in a theatre, at a ball; we do not wonder when we learn that those artists who delight and ennoble our souls, pass their lives in drunkenness, in playing cards, in company with loose women, or do things still worse.
Science and art are fine things: but just because they are fine things men ought not to spoil them by associating them with depravity;—by freeing themselves from man's duty to serve by labour his own life and the lives of other men.
Science and art have forwarded the progress of mankind.
Yes; but not because men of science and art, under the pretext16 of a division of labour, taught men by word, and chiefly by deed, to utilize by violence the misery17 and sufferings of the people in order to free themselves from the very first and unquestionable human duty of labouring with their hands in the common struggle of mankind with nature.
点击收听单词发音
1 secular | |
n.牧师,凡人;adj.世俗的,现世的,不朽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 utilize | |
vt.使用,利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 functionaries | |
n.公职人员,官员( functionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 utilizing | |
v.利用,使用( utilize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 forerunners | |
n.先驱( forerunner的名词复数 );开路人;先兆;前兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 forsook | |
forsake的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pampered | |
adj.饮食过量的,饮食奢侈的v.纵容,宠,娇养( pamper的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 debilitated | |
adj.疲惫不堪的,操劳过度的v.使(人或人的身体)非常虚弱( debilitate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 manure | |
n.粪,肥,肥粒;vt.施肥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 chattering | |
n. (机器振动发出的)咔嗒声,(鸟等)鸣,啁啾 adj. 喋喋不休的,啾啾声的 动词chatter的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 pretext | |
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |