This question came up in my mind lately with regard to English fiction and its form, or rather its formlessness. How, for instance, could people who had once known the simple verity5, the refined perfection of Miss Austere6, enjoy, anything less refined and less perfect?
With her example before them, why should not English novelists have gone on writing simply, honestly, artistically7, ever after? One would think it must have been impossible for them to do otherwise, if one did not remember, say, the lamentable8 behavior of the actors who support Mr. Jefferson, and their theatricality9 in the very presence of his beautiful naturalness. It is very difficult, that simplicity10, and nothing is so hard as to be honest, as the reader, if he has ever happened to try it, must know. "The big bow-wow I can do myself, like anyone going," said Scott, but he owned that the exquisite11 touch of Miss Austere was denied him; and it seems certainly to have been denied in greater or less measure to all her successors. But though reading and writing come by nature, as Dogberry justly said, a taste in them may be cultivated, or once cultivated, it may be preserved; and why was it not so among those poor islanders? One does not ask such things in order to be at the pains of answering them one's self, but with the hope that some one else will take the trouble to do so, and I propose to be rather a silent partner in the enterprise, which I shall leave mainly to Senor Armando Palacio Valdes. This delightful12 author will, however, only be able to answer my question indirectly13 from the essay on fiction with which he prefaces one of his novels, the charming story of 'The Sister of San Sulpizio,' and I shall have some little labor14 in fitting his saws to my instances. It is an essay which I wish every one intending to read, or even to write, a novel, might acquaint himself with; for it contains some of the best and clearest things which have been said of the art of fiction in a time when nearly all who practise it have turned to talk about it.
Senor Valdes is a realist, but a realist according to his own conception of realism; and he has some words of just censure15 for the French naturalists16, whom he finds unnecessarily, and suspects of being sometimes even mercenarily, nasty. He sees the wide difference that passes between this naturalism and the realism of the English and Spanish; and he goes somewhat further than I should go in condemning17 it. "The French naturalism represents only a moment, and an insignificant18 part of life." . . . It is characterized by sadness and narrowness. The prototype of this literature is the 'Madame Bovary' of Flaubert. I am an admirer of this novelist, and especially of this novel; but often in thinking of it I have said, How dreary19 would literature be if it were no more than this! There is something antipathetic and gloomy and limited in it, as there is in modern French life; but this seems to me exactly the best possible reason for its being. I believe with Senor Valdes that "no literature can live long without joy," not because of its mistaken aesthetics20, however, but because no civilization can live long without joy. The expression of French life will change when French life changes; and French naturalism is better at its worst than French unnaturalism at its best. "No one," as Senor Valdes truly says, "can rise from the perusal21 of a naturalistic book . . . without a vivid desire to escape" from the wretched world depicted22 in it, "and a purpose, more or less vague, of helping23 to better the lot and morally elevate the abject24 beings who figure in it. Naturalistic art, then, is not immoral25 in itself, for then it would not merit the name of art; for though it is not the business of art to preach morality, still I think that, resting on a divine and spiritual principle, like the idea of the beautiful, it is perforce moral. I hold much more immoral other books which, under a glamour26 of something spiritual and beautiful and sublime27, portray28 the vices29 in which we are allied30 to the beasts. Such, for example, are the works of Octave Feuillet, Arsene Houssaye, Georges Ohnet, and other contemporary novelists much in vogue31 among the higher classes of society."
But what is this idea of the beautiful which art rests upon, and so becomes moral? "The man of our time," says Senor Valdes, "wishes to know everything and enjoy everything: he turns the objective of a powerful equatorial towards the heavenly spaces where gravitates the infinitude of the stars, just as he applies the microscope to the infinitude of the smallest insects; for their laws are identical. His experience, united with intuition, has convinced him that in nature there is neither great nor small; all is equal. All is equally grand, all is equally just, all is equally beautiful, because all is equally divine." But beauty, Senor Valdes explains, exists in the human spirit, and is the beautiful effect which it receives from the true meaning of things; it does not matter what the things are, and it is the function of the artist who feels this effect to impart it to others. I may add that there is no joy in art except this perception of the meaning of things and its communication; when you have felt it, and portrayed32 it in a poem, a symphony, a novel, a statue, a picture, an edifice33, you have fulfilled the purpose for which you were born an artist.
The reflection of exterior34 nature in the individual spirit, Senor Valdes believes to be the fundamental of art. "To say, then, that the artist must not copy but create is nonsense, because he can in no wise copy, and in no wise create. He who sets deliberately35 about modifying nature, shows that he has not felt her beauty, and therefore cannot make others feel it. The puerile36 desire which some artists without genius manifest to go about selecting in nature, not what seems to them beautiful, but what they think will seem beautiful to others, and rejecting what may displease37 them, ordinarily produces cold and insipid38 works. For, instead of exploring the illimitable fields of reality, they cling to the forms invented by other artists who have succeeded, and they make statues of statues, poems of poems, novels of novels. It is entirely39 false that the great romantic, symbolic40, or classic poets modified nature; such as they have expressed her they felt her; and in this view they are as much realists as ourselves. In like manner if in the realistic tide that now bears us on there are some spirits who feel nature in another way, in the romantic way, or the classic way, they would not falsify her in expressing her so. Only those falsify her who, without feeling classic wise or romantic wise, set about being classic or romantic, wearisomely reproducing the models of former ages; and equally those who, without sharing the sentiment of realism, which now prevails, force themselves to be realists merely to follow the fashion."
The pseudo-realists, in fact, are the worse offenders41, to my thinking, for they sin against the living; whereas those who continue to celebrate the heroic adventures of "Puss-in-Boots" and the hair-breadth escapes of "Tom Thumb," under various aliases42, only cast disrespect upon the immortals43 who have passed beyond these noises.
点击收听单词发音
1 beseech | |
v.祈求,恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 disabuse | |
v.解惑;矫正 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 mischievous | |
adj.调皮的,恶作剧的,有害的,伤人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 verity | |
n.真实性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 austere | |
adj.艰苦的;朴素的,朴实无华的;严峻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 artistically | |
adv.艺术性地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 lamentable | |
adj.令人惋惜的,悔恨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 theatricality | |
n.戏剧风格,不自然 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 censure | |
v./n.责备;非难;责难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 naturalists | |
n.博物学家( naturalist的名词复数 );(文学艺术的)自然主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 insignificant | |
adj.无关紧要的,可忽略的,无意义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 dreary | |
adj.令人沮丧的,沉闷的,单调乏味的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 aesthetics | |
n.(尤指艺术方面之)美学,审美学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 perusal | |
n.细读,熟读;目测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 depicted | |
描绘,描画( depict的过去式和过去分词 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 abject | |
adj.极可怜的,卑屈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 immoral | |
adj.不道德的,淫荡的,荒淫的,有伤风化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 glamour | |
n.魔力,魅力;vt.迷住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 portray | |
v.描写,描述;画(人物、景象等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 Vogue | |
n.时髦,时尚;adj.流行的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 portrayed | |
v.画像( portray的过去式和过去分词 );描述;描绘;描画 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 edifice | |
n.宏伟的建筑物(如宫殿,教室) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 exterior | |
adj.外部的,外在的;表面的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 puerile | |
adj.幼稚的,儿童的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 displease | |
vt.使不高兴,惹怒;n.不悦,不满,生气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 insipid | |
adj.无味的,枯燥乏味的,单调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 offenders | |
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 aliases | |
n.别名,化名( alias的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 immortals | |
不朽的人物( immortal的名词复数 ); 永生不朽者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |