"The principal cause," our Spaniard says, "of the decadence1 of contemporary literature is found, to my thinking, in the vice2 which has been very graphically3 called effectism, or the itch4 of awaking at all cost in the reader vivid and violent emotions, which shall do credit to the invention and originality5 of the writer. This vice has its roots in human nature itself, and more particularly in that of the artist; he has always some thing feminine in him, which tempts6 him to coquet with the reader, and display qualities that he thinks will astonish him, as women laugh for no reason, to show their teeth when they have them white and small and even, or lift their dresses to show their feet when there is no mud in the street . . . . What many writers nowadays wish, is to produce an effect, grand and immediate7, to play the part of geniuses. For this they have learned that it is only necessary to write exaggerated works in any sort, since the vulgar do not ask that they shall be quietly made to think and feel, but that they shall be startled; and among the vulgar, of course, I include the great part of those who write literary criticism, and who constitute the worst vulgar, since they teach what they do not know .. . . There are many persons who suppose that the highest proof an artist can give of his fantasy is the invention of a complicated plot, spiced with perils8, surprises, and suspenses; and that anything else is the sign of a poor and tepid9 imagination. And not only people who seem cultivated, but are not so, suppose this, but there are sensible persons, and even sagacious and intelligent critics, who sometimes allow themselves to be hoodwinked by the dramatic mystery and the surprising and fantastic scenes of a novel. They own it is all false; but they admire the imagination, what they call the 'power' of the author. Very well; all I have to say is that the 'power' to dazzle with strange incidents, to entertain with complicated plots and impossible characters, now belongs to some hundreds of writers in Europe; while there are not much above a dozen who know how to interest with the ordinary events of life, and by the portrayal10 of characters truly human. If the former is a talent, it must be owned that it is much commoner than the latter . . . . If we are to rate novelists according to their fecundity11, or the riches of their invention, we must put Alexander Dumas above Cervantes. Cervantes wrote a novel with the simplest plot, without belying12 much or little the natural and logical course of events. This novel which was called 'Don Quixote,' is perhaps the greatest work of human wit. Very well; the same Cervantes, mischievously13 influenced afterwards by the ideas of the vulgar, who were then what they are now and always will be, attempted to please them by a work giving a lively proof of his inventive talent, and wrote the 'Persiles and Sigismunda,' where the strange incidents, the vivid complications, the surprises, the pathetic scenes, succeed one another so rapidly and constantly that it really fatigues14 you . . . . But in spite of this flood of invention, imagine," says Seflor Valdes, "the place that Cervantes would now occupy in the heaven of art, if he had never written 'Don Quixote,'" but only 'Persiles and Sigismund!'
From the point of view of modern English criticism, which likes to be melted, and horrified15, and astonished, and blood-curdled, and goose- fleshed, no less than to be "chippered up" in fiction, Senor Valdes were indeed incorrigible16. Not only does he despise the novel of complicated plot, and everywhere prefer 'Don Quixote' to 'Persiles and Sigismunda,' but he has a lively contempt for another class of novels much in favor with the gentilities of all countries. He calls their writers "novelists of the world," and he says that more than any others they have the rage of effectism. "They do not seek to produce effect by novelty and invention in plot . . . they seek it in character. For this end they begin by deliberately17 falsifying human feelings, giving them a paradoxical appearance completely inadmissible . . . . Love that disguises itself as hate, incomparable energy under the cloak of weakness, virginal innocence18 under the aspect of malice19 and impudence20, wit masquerading as folly21, etc., etc. By this means they hope to make an effect of which they are incapable22 through the direct, frank, and conscientious23 study of character." He mentions Octave Feuillet as the greatest offender24 in this sort among the French, and Bulwer among the English; but Dickens is full of it (Boffin in 'Our Mutual25 Friend' will suffice for all example), and most drama is witness of the result of this effectism when allowed full play.
But what, then, if he is not pleased with Dumas, or with the effectists who delight genteel people at all the theatres, and in most of the romances, what, I ask, will satisfy this extremely difficult Spanish gentleman? He would pretend, very little. Give him simple, lifelike character; that is all he wants. "For me, the only condition of character is that it be human, and that is enough. If I wished to know what was human, I should study humanity."
But, Senor Valdes, Senor Valdes! Do not you know that this small condition of yours implies in its fulfilment hardly less than the gift of the whole earth? You merely ask that the character portrayed26 in fiction be human; and you suggest that the novelist should study humanity if he would know whether his personages are human. This appears to me the cruelest irony27, the most sarcastic28 affectation of humility29. If you had asked that character in fiction be superhuman, or subterhuman, or preterhuman, or intrahuman, and had bidden the novelist go, not to humanity, but the humanities, for the proof of his excellence30, it would have been all very easy. The books are full of those "creations," of every pattern, of all ages, of both sexes; and it is so much handier to get at books than to get at Men; and when you have portrayed "passion" instead of feeling, and used "power" instead of common-sense, and shown yourself a "genius" instead of an artist, the applause is so prompt and the glory so cheap, that really anything else seems wickedly wasteful31 of one's time. One may not make one's reader enjoy or suffer nobly, but one may give him the kind of pleasure that arises from conjuring32, or from a puppet-show, or a modern stage-play, and leave him, if he is an old fool, in the sort of stupor33 that comes from hitting the pipe; or if he is a young fool, half crazed with the spectacle of qualities and impulses like his own in an apotheosis34 of achievement and fruition far beyond any earthly experience.
But apparently35 Senor Valdes would not think this any great artistic36 result. "Things that appear ugliest in reality to the spectator who is not an artist, are transformed into beauty and poetry when the spirit of the artist possesses itself of them. We all take part every day in a thousand domestic scenes, every day we see a thousand pictures in life, that do not make any impression upon us, or if they make any it is one of repugnance37; but let the novelist come, and without betraying the truth, but painting them as they appear to his vision, he produces a most interesting work, whose perusal38 enchants39 us. That which in life left us indifferent, or repelled40 us, in art delights us. Why? Simply because the artist has made us see the idea that resides in it. Let not the novelists, then, endeavor to add anything to reality, to turn it and twist it, to restrict it. Since nature has endowed them with this precious gift of discovering ideas in things, their work will be beautiful if they paint these as they appear. But if the reality does not impress them, in vain will they strive to make their work impress others."
点击收听单词发音
1 decadence | |
n.衰落,颓废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 graphically | |
adv.通过图表;生动地,轮廓分明地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 itch | |
n.痒,渴望,疥癣;vi.发痒,渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 tempts | |
v.引诱或怂恿(某人)干不正当的事( tempt的第三人称单数 );使想要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 perils | |
极大危险( peril的名词复数 ); 危险的事(或环境) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tepid | |
adj.微温的,温热的,不太热心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 portrayal | |
n.饰演;描画 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fecundity | |
n.生产力;丰富 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 belying | |
v.掩饰,与…不符,使…失望;掩饰( belie的现在分词 );证明(或显示)…为虚假;辜负;就…扯谎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mischievously | |
adv.有害地;淘气地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 fatigues | |
n.疲劳( fatigue的名词复数 );杂役;厌倦;(士兵穿的)工作服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 horrified | |
a.(表现出)恐惧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 incorrigible | |
adj.难以纠正的,屡教不改的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 impudence | |
n.厚颜无耻;冒失;无礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 conscientious | |
adj.审慎正直的,认真的,本着良心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 offender | |
n.冒犯者,违反者,犯罪者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 portrayed | |
v.画像( portray的过去式和过去分词 );描述;描绘;描画 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 sarcastic | |
adj.讥讽的,讽刺的,嘲弄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 humility | |
n.谦逊,谦恭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 excellence | |
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 wasteful | |
adj.(造成)浪费的,挥霍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 conjuring | |
n.魔术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 stupor | |
v.昏迷;不省人事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 apotheosis | |
n.神圣之理想;美化;颂扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 repugnance | |
n.嫌恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 perusal | |
n.细读,熟读;目测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 enchants | |
使欣喜,使心醉( enchant的第三人称单数 ); 用魔法迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 repelled | |
v.击退( repel的过去式和过去分词 );使厌恶;排斥;推开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |