A chapter devoted1 to Palaeolithic Man may perhaps appear irrelevant2 to a work the aim of which is to serve as an introduction to English history; for it has been questioned whether in this country he left any descendants, and therefore whether he exercised even the smallest influence upon the later immigrants. But in France, if not here, the Palaeolithic merged3, perhaps by a long period of transition, into the Neolithic4 Age:17 the neolithic inhabitants of Britain were of course descended5 from palaeolithic ancestors; and in every part of the world in which it existed the palaeolithic culture was apparently6 much the same. There are therefore other reasons besides that of sentiment for attempting in this book to describe the life of primitive7 men and the surroundings in which they lived: yet sentiment has its weight; for no one who is not heedless of the past would forget the efforts of those who, in hard struggle with nature and with fierce beasts, were the unconscious founders9 of European civilization. Without the faith of the Shinto ancestor-worshipper one may share his daily repeated pious10 gratitude,—‘Ye forefathers11 of the generations, and of our families, and of our kindred, unto you, the founders of our homes, we utter the gladness of our thanks.’18
Tertiary man.
The palaeolithic people had acquired a degree of skill in the manufacture of stone tools which is only attainable13 by the most practised modern imitators. But the progress which they made during the incalculably long period of their existence was so small that they must have needed ages to ascend14 to the level at which we are able to observe them. Therefore, although no skeletons, no implements15 have yet been found which can be referred, in the opinion of all 14 experts, to the Tertiary Period, the most sceptical are willing to believe that man, even if he did not deserve the appellation17 of Homo sapiens, did then wander upon the face of the earth.19 But how, when he had assumed the erect18 position and had begun to make intelligent use of the hands which gave him such an advantage in contending with other carnivorous animals more powerful than himself, he learned slowly and by repeated efforts to chip the flints that he picked up into serviceable shapes; how in the struggle for a livelihood19 the stronger or the more cunning prevailed; how with developing intelligence came keener susceptibility to pain as well as to pleasure; how men’s fancies were quickened by light and darkness, sun, moon, and stars, and their fears excited by storm and flood and fire; how they strove to communicate to each other their alarms, their desires, and their joys—these things may only be imagined; and the imagination of those who have read most wisely and have most observantly studied the ways of modern savages22 will lead them least astray.
The Ice Age.
The Tertiary was merging23 into the Quaternary or Pleistocene Period when the climate which had before fostered the palms and crocodiles whose fossils have been discovered in the London Clay,20 but had been gradually changing, became intensely cold. Snow fell thickly upon the mountains of Scandinavia; glaciers24 began to creep down the valleys; and gradually the ice accumulated until it overspread the whole of Northern Europe, filled the basins of the Baltic and the North Sea, hid mountains and uplands in Scotland, and choked the dales of Northern England, of the Midlands, and of Wales; while isolated25 glaciers were formed even so far southward as the valleys of the Beaujolais and the Lyonnais. The ice has left its record upon the Highland26 and Cumbrian mountains, whose rugged27 crags it moulded into flowing curves; upon rocks which were scratched by stones embedded28 in slowly moving glaciers; 15 in the mud, stiff and tenacious29, which they deposited as they grided over many kinds of rocks, and which, being interspersed30 with stones, large and small, is called boulder-clay; in rocks which they transported and dropped far from their native sites, and by which the directions that they followed can still be traced; in moraines which mark the limits of their descent and their recession; in lakes that were formed, after the ice had disappeared, in glens which moraines had dammed;21 in the Arctic plants which survive on mountains, and in those whose fossil remains31 have been found in Norfolk near the level of the sea. In many places the boulder-clay lies in two or more layers, separated by stratified sands and gravels32, from which it has been generally inferred that the Ice Age was interrupted by a period—here and there by short intervals—during which the climate was mild. Told briefly35 and in general terms, the tale which a learner might piece together from geological textbooks22 is something like this. The cold was most intense during the earlier stage, when the lower boulder-clay was being deposited, and, little by little, Britain rose until it became one with the Continent, with Ireland, and with Scandinavia, and extended far westward36 into the Atlantic Ocean. Then, we are told, the ice-sheet that covered Scandinavia was 16 six thousand feet thick; and though it became thinner as it advanced southward, it shrouded37 the hill-tops in Scotland, where boulders38 were lifted right over the water-parting, and dropped on the western side, and scored its marks upon rocks in the Lake District at heights of two thousand five hundred feet; while, spreading over Ireland, it went out to sea beyond Cork39 and Kerry, where the wall of ice broke off and floated away in bergs. Then the land slowly sank until in the interglacial period only the hills stood out above the sea, and Great Britain became an archipelago. Again the movement was upward, though often interrupted and perhaps not general in extent: the climate was again becoming severe; and, although the rigours of the first period were not repeated, local glaciers crept down the higher valleys north of the Midlands, while icebergs40 floated over the parts that remained submerged and over the North Sea. Now too, as in the earlier period, the cold was not everywhere continuous: there were oscillations during which the glaciers alternately advanced and retreated. As the Ice Age was beginning to near its end, the land continued to rise until the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Irish Sea once more disappeared. In the latest stage of all, when Arctic conditions were about to vanish even in our northern latitudes41, there was a gradual subsidence: Scotland was lowered about one hundred feet beneath the present level of the sea, as the highest ‘raised beach’ along the shores of the great estuaries42 testifies; and the waters rushed in over the sinking valley of the Dover Strait.
Such was the orthodox faith: but the rising geologists43 have discarded some of its articles; and even among the faithful there are pious doubters. Many authorities deny that the sea-shells which are found on hills in North Wales, Cheshire, and elsewhere, prove that they were once submerged: those shells, they insist, were ploughed up by glaciers out of the sea-floor; and they require us to believe that they were carried up the sides of the hills to heights of thirteen hundred and fifty feet above the sea-level.23 But 17 although these shells are probably not in their original position, and the mere45 presence of marine46 organisms is no sufficient proof of former submergence, shells have been found near Inverness, five hundred feet above the sea, in the very place where they lived and died. Still, it does not follow that the submergence which they attest47 was interglacial.24 Some inquirers believe that the glaciers advanced and retreated once and no more;25 that there was only one slight elevation48 of the land and one slight subsidence: others that Britain was not only elevated twice, but also twice partially49 submerged; others that it was finally severed50 from the Continent in the earlier part of the Ice Age, when the drainage of Northern Europe, pouring into the North Sea and barred by the ice-sheet from escaping northwards, cut for itself a channel across the isthmus51 which now lies below the Dover Strait.26 One expert still insists that when man first entered Britain the whole country stood at least six hundred feet above its present level:27 another, in the same work, denies that its greatest elevation was more than seventy feet;28 and their editor looks helplessly on. One writer suggests that there may never have been an Ice Age, in the strictest sense of the term, at all, but only local glaciers, such as now exist in Greenland.29 Another has laboured to show that the accumulation of ice-sheets ‘merely marked one or more culminating epochs in a period when the climate was at least as commonly temperate53 as Arctic’.30 Others even now 18 maintain that not one only, but five interglacial periods interrupted the intense cold;31 others again that there was no interglacial period at all, but only local ameliorations of climate.32 Another fertile theme of controversy54 has been the origin of the boulder-clays. But the confession55 of a Fellow of the Royal Society, who, as a member of the Geological Survey, lived in Norfolk for eight years, studying its geology, suggests that, after all, a sense of humour may compensate56 for inability to fathom57 the mysteries of the Ice Age. ‘After spending about a year in Norfolk,’ he says, ‘I began to believe I knew all about the drifts, but during the following seven years of my sojourn58 in that county, as I moved from place to place, I somehow seemed to know less and less, and I cannot say what would have been the result, but fortunately the geological survey of the county came to an end.’33 Fortunately, too, it is not essential to our study of palaeolithic man to decide in every case between the theories of rival geologists. All admit that in Britain the Thames was the extreme southern limit of glacial movement, although even in the southern fringe Arctic conditions prevailed; that glaciers covered a large part of the country north of the Thames, and on the higher regions coalesced59 into ice-sheets: the view that the lower boulder-clay was a moraine profonde has at last been generally adopted;34 while almost all agree that there was at least one interglacial period, and that there were climatic variations in certain tracts60. Nevertheless one of the ablest and most experienced of our field geologists has recently given weighty reasons for his own conviction that even this solitary61 age of amelioration should not be regarded as an established fact.35 19
Continental62 Britain.
But, if we are to study the Palaeolithic Age intelligently, we must endeavour to test for ourselves the dogma that Britain was then continental. That dogma has recently been questioned by geologists who have minutely re-examined in the field the phenomena63 of the Glacial Epoch52. Mr. Clement64 Reid, for instance, holds that in the Palaeolithic Age England never rose more than seventy feet above its present level,36 and that men first entered it across a narrow strait which was formed in the earlier period of glaciation.37 It is certain that the sea then washed the coast of Sussex and the western counties; for near Selsea there is a patch of boulder-clay—the only one south of the Thames—which must have been deposited by shore-ice, and there are rocks belonging to Bognor or the Isle65 of Wight, to the Channel Islands, and to Brittany, which were transported by icebergs and dropped when they melted under the summer sun.38 Again, before the first English boulder-clay was formed Arctic plants flourished near Cromer; and, says Mr. Reid,39 ‘as these occur just above the present sea-level, and lie evenly on the strata66 below without deeply channelling them, the height of the land at the commencement of the Glacial Epoch, in Norfolk 20 at any rate, must have been almost the same as it is now’. The same observer assures us that in Southern Britain the first intense cold was succeeded, after an interval34 of which geology has nothing to tell, by an interglacial period in which the land sunk about one hundred and forty feet below its present level, so that shingle67 was deposited on what is now Portsdown Hill;40 and that it then gradually rose until, long before the second glaciation began, its level, marked by fresh-water and estuarine68 deposits, once more virtually coincided with the present line.41 But, he tells us, at some time after the disappearance69 of the ice which deposited the latest boulder-clay of Norfolk the land stood rather higher than now;42 and he holds that even in the early part of the Neolithic Age Britain must have been almost connected with the Continent, for many of the river valleys were excavated70 to depths of from sixty to seventy feet below the present level of the sea.43 The submerged forests of Devonshire, Cornwall, and the Bristol Channel, which contain traces of neolithic handiwork, flourished at a time when the land stood from fifty to seventy feet above its present elevation.44
But there are other facts which demonstrate that at some time after the first period of intense cold—perhaps in that interval of which geology has nothing to tell—the Continent must have included Britain. As we shall presently see, not only the mammoth72, the woolly rhinoceros73, the glutton74, and other Arctic animals, but also many species which prefer a temperate climate, and others which are now tropical, lived in this country side by side with palaeolithic man. Nearly all of them had been represented here 21 before the earliest glaciers of Scotland were formed.45 But even on the southern side of the Thames the cold was so intense during the earlier part of the Ice Age that none of the tropical, none even of the temperate species could there have lived: since the land was barren, treeless, and frozen,46 even the mammoth, protected though it was by its woolly coat, could have found little food;47 and large herds76 of Arctic animals travelled as far southward as Italy and Spain.48 It is therefore evident that the beasts of tropical and of temperate climes whose remains have been found in the river-drift and in caves along with palaeolithic implements must have entered Britain after the coldest period had ceased.49 Moreover, vast quantities of bones 22 of Pleistocene mammals, some of which, such as the reindeer77, have never been found in Britain in preglacial deposits, have been dredged up out of the bed of the North Sea, principally from the Dogger Bank;50 and it is therefore clear that at some time after the climax78 of the Glacial Period that sea or a large part of it did not exist. It cannot indeed be proved that the men of the river-drift and the caves entered Britain as soon as the other animals;51 and possibly the Dover Strait may have existed as a narrow channel at the time of their arrival: but since the bones that were raised from the Dogger Bank appear to belong to the time when the Thames was laying down the gravels in which men’s tools have been found,52 it seems probable that the land bridge was standing79 in some part of the Palaeolithic Age.
The relation of palaeolithic man to the Ice Age.
It has been demonstrated that palaeolithic men were living in East Anglia after glaciers had finally disappeared from that part of the country. The valleys of the Ouse and its tributaries80, in the gravels of which their implements are to be found, were worn down through boulder-clay.53 Excavations82 at Hoxne in Suffolk have shown that the people who left their tools there lived at a time which was separated by two climatic waves, attested83 by the flora84 of two sets of strata, from the age in which the latest boulder-clay 23 of that district had been deposited.54 Moreover, in many cases in which evidence has been adduced to show that palaeolithic remains are of glacial or interglacial date, doubts have arisen either as to the artificial character of the flints or as to the age of the beds in which they were found.55 When, for instance, a member of the Geological Survey announced that he had found palaeolithic implements at Brandon in Suffolk in three interglacial beds, separated by layers of boulder-clay,56 Sir John Evans suggested that the clay was not in its original position, but had slipped down from a higher level.57 Again, Dr. Henry Hicks and Sir Joseph Prestwich were convinced that the cave of Cae Gwyn in the Vale of Clwyd had been inhabited before the climax of the Ice Age.58 Here a flint flake85 was taken out of earth separated by a superincumbent bed of clay from a layer of sand and gravel33, above which again rested boulder-clay that, in Hicks’s judgement, showed no sign of having ever been disturbed, and which, in the opinion of Mr. Clement Reid,59 must have been deposited before the last glaciation of the district. Even this evidence, however, is not unanimously accepted. Flints have also been found in the Cromer Forest Bed at East Runton, which was certainly preglacial; but Sir John Evans cannot see on them the faintest marks of human workmanship.60 24
Nevertheless, it is not improbable that when the hunters whose tools have been exhumed86 from the drift of South-Eastern Britain were living in a comparatively mild climate, Scotland, the Lake Country, and the highlands of Yorkshire and Wales may still have been partially buried beneath ice.61 The high-level drift of the Thames valley, which has yielded so many implements, is believed by eminent87 geologists to have been laid down at a time when ice spread over Northern Britain;62 and in support of this view it has been contended that in those regions no palaeolithic implements have been found.63 The argument cannot be easily set aside; but it has been pointed88 out that in the northern districts, owing to the extreme scarcity89 of flint, stone tools could only have been made of harder rocks, on which it is not so easy to detect marks of human agency; that the alluvial90 deposits in those parts are not readily accessible to search; and that, if they are patiently explored, implements may yet be recovered from them.64 Some years, however, have elapsed since this suggestion was made; and it has not yet been verified. Moreover, the absence from the country north of Yorkshire, save in a few preglacial deposits, of such bones as have been found with palaeolithic remains seems to indicate that the animals contemporary with palaeolithic man were unable to find food in Northern Britain owing to the continuance of an Arctic climate.65 Man was undoubtedly91 living in Southern Britain in the cold period that succeeded the so-called interglacial 25 period of Sussex and Hampshire; for the plateau gravels that cap the Bournemouth cliffs, in which his tools have been found, are older than the valley gravels of the Hampshire Avon and the Stour, which were formed towards the end of the Ice Age by torrents92 that streamed over frozen chalk downs impervious93 to water and swept away the fragments of their crumbling94 surface.66 Furthermore, stone implements have been found at Caddington below, and near London embedded in, a stratum95 known as ‘contorted drift’, which is believed to have been formed in a period of great cold;67 and it is merely a question of words whether this period is to be included in the last phase of the Ice Age.68
‘Eolithic’ man?
But there is one district from which evidence has been obtained that has convinced many who sought conviction, that there were men in Britain before the first British palaeolithic tool was made. In the village of Ightham, near Sevenoaks, lives a tradesman, named Benjamin Harrison, whose discoveries have caused much searching of heart, if they have not revolutionized our knowledge of the life of early man. In 1885 he began to search for old stone implements on the chalk plateau between the valleys of the Medway and the Darent. There, embedded in patches of gravel that must have been drifted on to the plateau from hills higher still, which had been already worn down by denudation96 even when palaeolithic hunters were roaming among herds of mammoths in the valley of the Thames, he found flints of divers97 shapes which seemed to him to bear sure traces of man’s handiwork, and which have been 26 termed ‘eoliths’, or stone implements of a dawning age. Nearly all of them, indeed, were so rude that the chipping on their edges has been ascribed by sceptics to the action of nature. But if even a small fraction of them could be proved to be authentic98, the contention99 of their finder would be established. They recur100, again and again, in certain well-defined and peculiar101 shapes; the chips have in many cases been removed not from the exposed parts but from concave sides which, he would have us believe, natural agents could hardly have affected102;69 if Sir John Evans and other experts are unable to accept them as artificial, Canon Greenwell,70 Pitt-Rivers,71 and Prestwich72 were convinced that they had been wrought103 by man; even the labourers who picked them out of the gravel hardly ever failed to distinguish them from the surrounding flints;73 and, if we may believe the champions of their authenticity104, those who assert that they were shaped by nature have failed to produce stones of similar forms from the valley-drift.74 Now when the hunters of the Thames valley were making their tools, Britain had the same main features of hill and dale that it has to-day; but when the gravels were being drifted on to the Kentish plateau, Thames and Medway were yet unborn; and, filling the great valley that now lies between the North Downs and the Lower Greensand hills, some five miles further south, the plateau rose southward to Central Wealden uplands two thousand feet or more above the sea. With no special knowledge of geology the antiquary who spends a holiday in walking from Sevenoaks or Wrotham on to the plateau may satisfy himself that this is true. Mingled106 with the eoliths in the patches of 27 drift are fragments of chert that must have been washed down from the Lower Greensand at a time when it rose high above the plateau’s level; for south of the eolithic area, inclining upward below the chalk and below the Upper Greensand, the outcrop of the Lower Greensand shows itself still. The plateau drift lies upon rock of preglacial age;75 and although there is no evidence that it is itself older than the Pleistocene period, some geologists hold that it was deposited soon after, perhaps before, British glaciers began to form.76
But assuming that the eoliths are artificial, does it follow that they are older than the oldest palaeoliths, or that they were wrought by a race different from the men of the valleys? Mr. Clement Reid has pointed out that the gravel at Alderbury, some three miles below Salisbury, in which multitudes of eoliths have been found, is on exactly the same level as that of a gravel three miles lower down the valley, where Prestwich picked up a palaeolithic implement16 which had fallen from a yet higher elevation.77 If the position of this implement was an index of its age, eoliths were being used in Wiltshire after palaeoliths had begun to be manufactured.78 On the other hand, it is asserted that eoliths have lately been found in Tertiary deposits on the high plateau above the Avon;79 and one 28 geologist44, who rejects all eoliths, would argue that Benjamin Harrison’s labours have not been vain. Many palaeolithic implements have been found on the Kentish plateau, but never embedded in association with eoliths: most of them are unworn, and look as if they had remained on the very spot where they were lost; and it is easy to see that they are far less ancient than the eoliths. But certain implements have also been found there which, although they were not lying in the gravels, appeared to bear marks of having been derived107 from them and washed down in the same drift that contains the eoliths. Like the latter they were stained deep brown, covered with glacial scratches, and coated with the white deposit of silica.80 If this argument had been generally accepted, one might conclude that the greater antiquity108 of British man does not depend for its proof upon the authenticity of the eoliths. What all admit is that in France flints of eolithic form have been found even in Tertiary beds.81 29
But while the extreme antiquity of many eoliths is certain, the question of their authenticity has recently been debated with renewed and redoubled vigour109. About two years ago an eminent French palaeontologist, Monsieur Marcellin Boule, announced that in the process of manufacturing cement at Mantes many flints had been converted into eolithic forms;82 and it has been contended that the conditions which were actually observed in the factory were analogous110 to those of the torrential streams by which flints may have been dashed hither and thither111 as they were swept on to the Kentish plateau in primaeval times.83 An ardent112 advocate of the authenticity of eoliths insisted that some of the Kentish types would be looked for in vain among the machine-made specimens114 from Mantes;84 but a sceptic affirmed that he had himself found an eolith, manifestly untouched by man, with its notch115 accurately116 fitting against another stone, the two having been ground together by a natural process which he described as the slipping, sliding, and foundering117 of the insoluble surface material from higher to lower levels.85 Although it was objected that certain rectangular eoliths with blunt edges could not have been produced except by art,86 it is permissible118 to doubt whether the human origin of eoliths will ever be established beyond dispute; and he who reflects that they have been met with not only in Tertiary beds but in those immeasurably later deposits which were contemporary with or but little older than palaeolithic man87 30 will leave them for the present without regret to the consideration of enthusiasts119.
The environment of palaeolithic man in Britain.
Let us then try to conceive of the environment of those palaeolithic hunters of whose culture we have clearer indications in a late phase of the Ice Age, when the glaciers of Southern Britain had passed away. Then the configuration121 of the country was very different from that which we behold123. The chalk ranges of Kent and of Picardy were unbroken. The Thames, fed sometimes by torrential rains, flowing rapidly and fitfully in the broad shallow valley which it was excavating124, was depositing gravels on the slopes that bordered it, a hundred feet above the level of its existing waters,88 and wandering far eastward125 across a plain from whose now sunken surface bones of mammoth and reindeer, of hyena126 and bear have been dredged, to swell127 that greater Rhine which found no outlet128 till it reached a far northern sea. Mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses129, and giant elks130 with antlers ten feet across, roamed in the forests; hippopotamuses131 swam in the streams;89 brown bears and grizzly133 bears and lions and hyenas134 made their dens135 in caves, and dragged into their dark and sinuous136 recesses137 the prey138 which they had torn down in the open.
Whence did he come?
The earlier palaeolithic immigrants, impelled139 perhaps by scarcity of game, had crossed the valley of the Dover Strait doubtless from the nearer parts of France or Belgium; but the original home of the race is unknown, for palaeolithic tools have been found not only in this island and almost every European country except Scandinavia, but also in North Africa, in the valley of the Nile,90 in Palestine and 31 Asia Minor140, the Euphrates Valley, Somaliland, India, and North America: as a high authority has remarked, they are ‘so identical in form and character with British specimens that they might have been manufactured by the same hands’;91 and the same may be said of those which were wrought by the Tasmanians, who, fifty years ago, had not yet been exterminated141 by the pioneers of Christian142 civilization.92
Chronological143 puzzles.
Many attempts have been made to calculate the number of millenniums that have elapsed since our Palaeolithic Age began and since it came to its end. Croll, the author of the astronomical144 theory of the Ice Age, finally concluded that that epoch ceased about eighty thousand years ago;93 and Sir Archibald Geikie laboured in his youth to estimate the time which the rivers would have taken to excavate71 their valleys from the days when they were depositing the high-level gravels to the era when they reached their present depth.94 But any one who uses his powers of reflection will see how many elements of uncertainty145 must stultify146 such a method as this;95 and, since the cause of the Ice Age remains unknown, the calculations of Croll were futile147.96 Indeed, if it were possible to prove that eighty thousand years have passed since the beginning or since the end of the Palaeolithic Age, not much would be gained; for whose mind can conceive what such a period means? 32 The wiser archaeologists have given up the quest of chronological precision; and they know that the imagination may be stimulated148 by more legitimate149 means. Go to Caversham and stand upon the gravels washed down by the Thames in his lusty youth:97 one hundred and twenty feet below he is flowing now; think of the ages that passed while his waters were hollowing out that valley, which was as it is still before the Palaeolithic Age had passed away. Walk along the cliff near Bournemouth, and look out over the Solent Sea. That cliff was once a river bank; and even the cautious geologist who has described how Hampshire was wrought into its present form is willing to believe that man had then appeared in our land. Where you see salt water he would have seen dry land, bounded far away by a range of hills which linked the downs of the Isle of Wight to those that rise behind Weymouth Bay, and of which the Needles remain as lonely relics150: he would have seen the Solent flow, a mighty151 river, enriched by the tribute of the Stour, the Avon, the Itchen, and the Test.98 Ascend the hill on which stands Dover Castle, and gaze upon Cape152 Grisnez. Let the waters beneath you disappear: across the chalk that once spanned the Channel like a bridge men walked from the white cliff that marks the horizon to where you stand. No arithmetical chronology can spur the imagination to flights like these.99 33
Palaeolithic skeletons.
The dwellers153 on the plateau, if they did exist in preglacial times, have left us no memorial save their tools: but can we picture to ourselves the lineaments of the palaeolithic hunters who came after them? Human bones, including two perfect skulls154, closely associated with the bones of hyenas, have been recovered from a cave near Plymouth. The average height of the people to whom they belonged was little more than five feet: the skulls have hardly been described with sufficient accuracy to enable us to compare them with others of the same period; but, in regard to breadth and to the degree of projection156 of the lower jaw157, they were not very different from the majority of modern British skulls.100 Two other human skulls have been found in England for which palaeolithic age has been claimed—one near Swanscombe in Kent, the other near Bury St. Edmunds; but the former may not be as old as the bed from which it was unearthed158; and the other was so broken that its contour could hardly be restored.101 But almost all the older palaeolithic skulls that have been found in Western Europe belong to the same type, which is generally called after the famous specimen113 that was exhumed nearly half a century ago in the Neander valley in Rhenish Prussia, and of which the most characteristic examples were derived from a cavern159 at Spy in the province of Namur. The Swanscombe skull155 has somewhat similar characters; and it has been supposed that the earlier palaeolithic inhabitants of Britain belonged to the Neanderthal race. Unfortunately, however, the 34 dates of the Neanderthal and Spy specimens cannot be fixed160. The latter may belong to the comparatively advanced period in which the best palaeolithic stone implements of France were manufactured: the former was not seen in place by a competent observer, and its age is quite uncertain.102 If the very few skeletons that we possess are typical, these men were short, big-boned, and powerfully built. Their heads were long and narrow, their foreheads amazingly low and retreating, and their jaws161 heavy and projecting. But their most striking features were enormously massive and outstanding brow ridges162. Although the Neanderthal skull was described by Huxley as the most ape-like of all human skulls, and although for some time after its discovery it was the subject of animated163 discussion, it and its congeners were thenceforward regarded by all anatomists until the beginning of the present century as human in the strictest sense of the word. Within the last few years, however, a German anthropologist164 has endeavoured to prove that it and the two skulls of Spy may only be called human in a limited sense: he refuses to class them under the head of Homo sapiens, and refers them to an older species, which he calls Homo primigenius. This view, however, has not made influential165 converts: the Neanderthal skull was capacious enough to lodge166 a brain as large as that of many a living savage21; and trained observers have pointed out that skulls of like contour have belonged in modern times to men of considerable mental power.103 A considerable number of skeletons have lately been discovered in Moravia, which, although like the Neanderthal race they had long skulls and prominent brows, belonged to a higher type, and, as the length of their thigh-bones showed, were of great stature;104 while the caves of Baoussé-Roussé, near Mentone, were the resting-place of very ancient men, in whose skeletons anatomists have detected certain negroid characteristics, although their skulls must have contained a large volume of brain.105
But the Palaeolithic Age was of such vast duration that 35 Palaeolithic artists. before its close Britain may well have been invaded by new races. In the latest period there were living in the Riviera a people whose physical features connect them with the earliest French neolithic race; and in South-Western France skulls of like type have been found at Laugerie-Basse and Chancelade in the valley of the Lozère.106 The relics of these men which have been discovered in the caves in which they dwelled show that some of them were worthy167 to be called forerunners168 of Pheidias and Praxiteles. With their tools of flint or chert they carved ivory dagger-handles, or, as we are now assured, objects of uncertain use,107 adorning169 them with figures of the heads of reindeer, and scratched on horns or tusks170 drawings of mammoths, deer, horses, and hunters spearing salmon171, of which the finer examples are recognized by modern artists as true works of art.108 A single specimen, found in the Robin172 Hood20 Cave in Creswell Crags, is all that we can show:109 but implements with which it was associated present points of likeness173 to those of the French caves which justify174 the assumption that the primitive artists of France sent emigrants175 to our land.
Range of the palaeolithic hunters in Britain.
The palaeolithic nomads176, whether of the earlier or the later race, pushed their way as far north as Lincolnshire, Derbyshire, and Denbighshire, perhaps even into the East Riding of Yorkshire; and as far west as Glamorganshire, Caermarthenshire and Devonshire:110 but almost all the 36 remains of their handiwork have been found in the south-eastern district of England,—in Kent, especially the neighbourhood of Reculver, Sussex, Hampshire, Essex, Middlesex, and Surrey, Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire, and Northamptonshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire, Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, and Suffolk.
Where their tools have been found.
The places in which these relics lay buried may be grouped in four classes,—the plateau gravels, already described; gravels which were apparently deposited not by rivers but by heavy rains which, falling upon frozen chalk downs, destroyed the shattered surface and swept it away in floods;111 the river-drift, and caves; and, unlike the belongings179 of the neolithic herdsmen, those of the older inhabitants are not to be found, except in special cases, on or near the surface of the earth. The amateur who has acquired the rudiments180 of geology and has learned to discern stone implements among the fragments of rock which surround them, knows that in the gravels and sands which rivers deposited at various elevations181 when they were flowing now here now there in higher and wider channels he may hope to find specimens to add to his collection. Common sense too teaches him that in the same valley the higher terraces were formed before the lower, and that the tools which they contain, however closely they may resemble 37 those which are embedded below, are nevertheless, as a rule, far older.112 If he asks himself how they found their way into these gravel beds, reflection will soon suggest the answer. It would seem that although the palaeolithic hunters dwelled sometimes near lakes or ponds, they usually settled on the banks of streams. Fishing, hunting, wading182 through fords, warned by swiftly rising floods to quit their habitations, they lost or abandoned the weapons which now serve our purpose instead of theirs. But in some cases beds which contained palaeolithic remains are so situated183 that a tiro would never suppose that they had been deposited by running water at all. Few even of professed184 geologists would have thought of searching on the hill-tops at Caddington, near Dunstable; yet old stone implements have been found there in profusion185. When the men who made them were alive the hills were valleys, and the valleys which now lie below the hills did not exist. Nor would it have occurred to any but a geologist that the tools which were espied186 lying at the foot of the cliffs between Reculver and Herne Bay had fallen from the gravels which line their summit.113
Inhabited caves.
Kent’s Cavern and the Brixham Cave, near Torquay, the Wookey Hole ‘Hyena Den’, near Wells, the Long Hole Cave in Glamorganshire, and the caves of Creswell Crags, on the north-eastern border of Derbyshire, are perhaps the most famous of their class. Heaps of bones have been found in all of them, which proved that the men who, from time to time, inhabited them were contemporary, like those whose tools are recovered from the river-drift, with animals of which some, like the mammoth, the straight-tusked elephant, and the ‘sabre-toothed’ tiger, have disappeared from the face of the earth, and many have long been extinct in Britain. Generally in the lower strata the stone tools are exactly like those found in the river-drift; while in the higher they are as a rule more elaborately finished, and are associated with needles, harpoons187, and other implements of bone. The same sequence is discernible 38 in the palaeolithic caves of France and Belgium.114
Cave implements and river-drift implements.
Let us compare in some museum the sets of tools and weapons which have been taken from caves with those of the river-drift. Are the latter older than the former, and is it possible to establish in either or in both a chronological succession of types? Taken by itself, the form of palaeolithic implements, at least in this country, is not generally a criterion of their age; but neither the forms of those that have come from the caves nor the bones which accompanied them forbid us to believe that the oldest are at least as old as any that belonged to the drift. Generally speaking, the fauna188 of the caves and of the river gravels are identical.115 It is therefore certain that, although in general aspect a collection of implements derived from the former source is unlike one from the latter because the two were deposited in different circumstances, some of the deposits in the drift and in the caves were contemporaneous.116 Since a few implements of river-drift form have been found in caves along with those of higher types, it seems reasonable to conclude that the same men possessed189 both; and if those which are characteristic of the caves are almost entirely190 absent from the drift, is not the explanation partly that they were more perishable191, partly that many of them would not have been used in the field? In other words, there is no reason to believe that the later occupants of the caves were men of different race or of different habits from the contemporary hunters whose lost tools have been given up by the drift.117 Long ago Monsieur de Mortillet framed a chronological classification of French and Belgian palaeolithic implements according to their types, which, though of late years it has been modified, has been provisionally accepted; but in this country it has been found impossible to follow his example: the same types exist 39 here, but the relative antiquity of the specimens can seldom be determined193; for implements of the oldest French types have been found in deposits which belong to the close of our Palaeolithic Age.118 Even when implements from the high-level terraces are compared with those of the lower, no marked distinction is observed. In certain cases of course a local classification has been established. Thus the stone implements in the upper strata of two of the caves of Creswell Crags belonged to the advanced type which is called after the settlement of Solutré in the department of Sa?ne-et-Loire;119 and the implements of North-East London which, from their position at the bottom of the excavations as well as their colour, were evidently the oldest, were also inferior in workmanship to newer specimens found above them some twelve feet beneath the surface, and far inferior to the newest of the same district, which were recovered from an old land-surface, two or three feet below the existing ground, generally called the ‘Palaeolithic Floor.’120 Again, in the brick-fields of Caddington excavation81 revealed an ancient land-surface on which a palaeolithic colony had made their tools. At a later time a new surface about two feet higher was formed by brick-earth, which must have been swept down by heavy rains from the hills above; and on this more implements appeared. Above it again is a bed of contorted drift, containing implements whose deep ochreous colour would seem to show that of the three series they are the oldest: evidently they were washed down from the hill-tops on which perhaps lived the earliest inhabitants of the district, and which, as they were gradually worn away, formed 40 a deposit in what were then valleys, but are now in their turn hills. The lowest implements, which were of course older than those next above them, belong to the type called after the cave of Le Moustier in the valley of the Vezère, which is itself later than the type associated with the high-level gravels of the Somme.121 It has been suggested that when the evidence of plants or of strata is wanting, the relative age of palaeolithic implements may be provisionally estimated by the animal remains with which they are found. The straight-tusked elephant, the ‘big-nosed’ rhinoceros, and the hippopotamus132 were characteristic, we are told, of the earliest palaeolithic times;122 the mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, the cave-bear, and the hyena of a later period; and the reindeer was specially177 abundant towards the close of the age. But it is now generally recognized that if this orderly succession of fauna existed in Aquitaine, it cannot be distinguished194 either in our island or in Northern Gaul. When we find Arctic and tropical animals commingled195, when we see that the bones of big-nosed rhinoceros and woolly rhinoceros, of straight-tusked elephant and hyena and reindeer have been dug out of the same beds,123 we may conclude that it is hardly worth 41 while to gauge196 the antiquity of the works of palaeolithic craftsmen197 by such tests as these.
On a general review it should seem that the French chronological classifications of palaeolithic implements, even applied198 to England, contain a measure of truth. The implements which are commonly found in the river-drift and other deposits in the open field undoubtedly began to be manufactured before those which are characteristic of the caves; and those of Mousterian type were first made, both in England and in France, long before the development of the elegant Solutrean forms and the period in which flourished the artists of South-Western France.124 But both in France and in England Mousterian implements were still used during the later period;125 and even drift implements of the oldest kind continued to be used by palaeolithic hunters of the latest generation.126
Divers forms of tools.
In order to apprehend200 the culture of the palaeolithic races, it is necessary to be conversant201 with the forms of their tools. The great majority were made of flint; but in places where flint was scarce or difficult to obtain other stones, for example, chert, quartzite pebbles202, sandstones, and felstone, were used. The principal forms were flint flakes203, which were probably intended to serve as knives, sometimes even as saws (for a few of them are serrated),127 and, in certain instances, as scrapers for dressing204 hides; implements or weapons, pear-shaped or tongue-shaped in outline, more or less acutely pointed, and more or less truncated205 at the butt206, some of which look like spear-heads, though they may have been grasped in the hand; and oval, almond-shaped, and occasionally heart-shaped or 42 triangular207 implements, which have a cutting edge all round. Each of these forms of course comprises many varieties, not only in contour but also in the mode of chipping; and a few tools of abnormal shapes have also been found, as well as natural blocks of flint, called ‘hammer-stones’, which were used in the process of manufacture, and most of which were slightly trimmed in order to make them more serviceable. Near Ipswich a lady has recently discovered a tiny implement which, it has been fondly suggested, some hunter may have wrought as a toy for his child.128 Among the bone implements were harpoons, barbed sometimes on one, sometimes on both sides, which have been found in Kent’s Cavern and other caves, and which closely resemble those that are used by the Eskimos of our own day; and needles drilled by bone awls, with eyes so small that the threads of reindeer sinew which they received could hardly have exceeded a thirtieth of an inch in diameter. Moreover, it is more than probable that clubs, wooden tools, and utensils208 and vessels209 of skin were also used, which, from their perishable nature, have long since disappeared.129
Palaeolithic workshops.
The explorations of antiquaries have revealed more than one of the open-air workshops in which the primitive tool-makers210 plied199 their trade. Near Crayford, on a sandy beach beneath an old chalk cliff that overhung the Thames when on its southern side its bed was nearly two miles wider, excavation discovered the surface, strewn with flint flakes, in actual contact with mammoths’ bones, on which the workers had lived and toiled212 until a great flood drove them away, leaving the sediment213 which for countless214 ages concealed215 their remains. The inferior quality of the flint showed that they had not known how to win it by mining from the rock, but had been obliged to content themselves with such stray blocks as they could find. The enthusiast120 who discovered the site was actually able to fit 43 44 many of the flakes together, and to reconstruct the original blocks from which they had been struck off.130 At Caddington, where hammer-stones and punches, great blocks of flint which had been used as anvils216, and innumerable flakes and cores bore their silent testimony217, Mr. Worthington Smith inferred from the confusion in which finished and unfinished tools were left that the settlers, terrified perhaps by some violent storm, had suddenly quitted their abode218. He found an implement which had been ruined by an ill-directed blow of the hammer, and one which had been re-flaked219 and re-pointed by a later worker; and his practised eye detected that the craftsmen had flaked their tools differently from those of Crayford.131 Speaking generally, however, the methods of working were the same as those which are still followed by the ‘knappers’ of Brandon in Suffolk, who manufacture gun-flints for African savages. The flakes which were to be used as knives or scrapers were detached from the blocks by a stone hammer; and the larger implements were trimmed into the various shapes which have been described, by blows along their edges, which chipped off small splinters. The effect of the hammer was to produce on the flake, just below the point where the blow was delivered, a protuberance, which is called the ‘bulb of percussion’, and which of course left a corresponding cavity on the block from which the flake was detached. This bulb is the mark by which a manufactured flint may be recognized; but on tools whose artificial origin is manifest even to an untrained eye it has often been obliterated220 by the process of chipping.132
Fig122. 1.
Fig. 2. ?
Fig. 3. ?
Fig. 4. ?
Handles.
Inquisitive221 antiquaries have raised the question whether any palaeolithic implements were furnished with handles. The Tasmanians simply grasped their tools in their hands;133 and there is little evidence that the Britons mounted theirs:134 45 but the triangular sharply-pointed flints which have been already described might sometimes have been used as arrow-points or javelin-heads.135 Some were doubtless missiles and nothing more.
Uses of tools.
But, as experts who have passed their leisure in recovering, comparing, and classifying these things confess, it is impossible to define the various purposes to which this or that stone tool was applied. ‘Who,’ says Lord Avebury,136 ‘could describe the exact use of a knife?’ We only know that with his rude implements the palaeolithic hunter did all the work that his hand found to do,—felled trees, chopped wood to feed his fire, dug up esculent roots, scooped222 out canoes, killed and cut up the animals on which he subsisted223, skinned them and dressed their hides to clothe himself withal, encountered his enemies in battle, and defended himself in conflict with the beasts against which his keen sight and hearing, his intellect, and these weapons, which it enabled Culture of the palaeolithic inhabitants of Britain. him to fashion, were his sole protection.137 Yet as we look at the tools in a museum, nearly the same at the end as the beginning of our immeasurably long Palaeolithic Age, we marvel224 even more at the mental stagnation225 of the primeval savage than at the skill which he had laboriously226 attained227; and we wonder how it was that men who had learned to chip their blocks of flint so accurately remained content, generation after generation, with the art which they had acquired, and never thought of grinding the cutting edge against another stone and thus producing a better and sharper weapon. ‘We see in our own times,’ wrote Sir Charles Lyell,138 ‘that the rate of progress in the arts and 46 sciences proceeds in a geometrical ratio as knowledge increases; and so, when we carry back our retrospect228 into the past, we must be prepared to find the signs of retardation229 augmenting230 in a like geometrical ratio.’ It would seem that in the Palaeolithic Age men had no pottery231 and grew no corn: they certainly had no cattle; and, though they lived by hunting, they had no dogs.139 Perhaps they sometimes dug pits to trap their game; for one of the engravings from La Madelaine may have been intended to depict234 a beast impaled235 upon a wooden stake.140 Their numbers must have been very small; for people who live by the chase alone require for their sustenance236 forests of vast extent.141 Some, as we have seen, lived in caves; others, as we may infer from the remains that have been picked up beneath the cliffs of Oldbury,142 by Sevenoaks, under projecting ledges237 of rock; generally perhaps, and especially in districts in which no caves were available, the dwellings238 were huts or shelters made of trees and boughs239. Some of the bones that were found in Kent’s Cavern, some even of the gravels that have yielded eoliths,143 show traces of fire, which was probably produced by the friction240 of sticks or by striking flint against iron pyrites;144 and one is tempted241 to infer that the hunters or their women learned to make their food more palatable242 by cooking. The numberless fractured 47 bones which were strewed243 in the caves had evidently been pounded for the sake of the marrow244, which in every age was a dainty dish for prehistoric245 folk; and in the closing period, when harpoons had been invented, men were able to vary their diet of meat and herbs and wild fruit with divers kinds of fish. By that time too they had acquired the art of sewing, and doubtless they made themselves coats of skins, perhaps even, like the cave-dwellers of the Pyrenees, long gauntlets of fur;145 while fossils that have been found with natural holes artificially enlarged may justify the assumption that, like the cave-dwellers of France, they adorned246 themselves with necklaces.146 The figure of a horse engraved247 on a bone that was disinterred from one of the Creswell caves suggests, as we have seen, that in this country, as in France, there were men who were not destitute249 of the artistic250 faculty251: but this solitary specimen can hardly compare with the best of the drawings that delighted the explorers of the contemporary French caves. It is difficult for any one who looks at these life-like sketches252 to believe that those who made them were not inspired by love of art; but the ingenuity253 of a modern archaeologist, who observes that the Australian aborigines scratch on rocks the likenesses of animals as charms to promote their fecundity254, has suggested that they were merely talismans255 intended to supply the hunter with abundant game. As he insists147 that the animals which the artists represented were all edible256, one may fairly ask whether they were accustomed to feed upon the glutton,148 the serpent, and the wolf;149 whether they counted each other as legitimate prey; what could have been the utilitarian257 motive258 for depicting259 an otter232 chasing a fish;150 and what was the object of engraving233 the 48 strange quasi-human creature which the antiquary who discovered it in the cavern of Mas d’Azil described as an ‘anthropomorphic ape, nearer akin105 to man than the anthropoids that we know’.151 Nevertheless it is not improbable that religion, which has stimulated savage as well as mediaeval and modern art, may have been one of the motives260 of the cave-dwellers; and perhaps the artist was sometimes a magician, though it would be idle to speculate on the purpose of his spells.152
Disciplined imagination, working upon a basis of ascertained261 fact, may help one to picture the lives of those primitive inhabitants of our island. We can see them returning at evening to the fires which their women had kindled262, and which served at once to warm them, to cook their food, to keep off beasts of prey, and to scare away the malignant263 spirits of whom, if they were like other savages, they were yet more in dread264. We may see a vast herd75 of reindeer crossing the ford178 at Windsor, and wolves watching for their chance to spring upon stragglers. We may hear the trumpeting265 of the elephant, the roar of the lion, the bellowing266 of the wild bull, the howl of the hyena, the snort of the hippopotamus, as it splashed or swam in the waters of the Thames or the Ouse. We may imagine the hunter striving by sign, or gesture, or rudimentary language, to express his delight when he has succeeded in the chase, his despair when ill success leaves him and his to pine with hunger, his terror when the eclipsed moon turning to red, when flood, or lightning, or pestilence267 warns him that the spirits of nature are wroth, his grief when bear, or bison, 49 or famished268 wolf has slain269 his wife or child. How he disposed of his dead he has left no sign: but in the caves near Mentone, which were inhabited in successive periods of the Palaeolithic Age, there were evidences that the corpses270 had been decently interred248;153 and the skeletons found in Moravia154 had been carefully protected by a rampart of stones.155
Religion.
Had the primitive people of Britain any religion, or any ideas that contained the germs of religious belief? It is not enough to point to modern savages like the Tasmanians, whose material culture was lower than that of the palaeolithic Britons, but who certainly believed in a spiritual world.156 The cave-dwellers of Mentone were interred with their implements and ornaments271, perhaps intended for use in a future state;157 but such evidence is not forthcoming here. The painted pebbles, however, and the ‘bull-roarers’ which were treasured in the caves of South-Western France may well have had analogues272 among the inhabitants of this island158 who were in the same stage of culture; and doubtless, like the similar objects which are shown by the natives of Central Australia, they were connected, more or less closely, with religious ideas.159 No savage tribe, indeed, has yet been observed of whom it can be proved that they were without religion; for some travellers who have affirmed the contrary have been unable to comprehend ideas which differed wholly from their own; some have recorded facts 50 which gave the lie to their own denial; some have confessed that after long intercourse273 they had discovered the existence of beliefs which they had never suspected; and all who have been qualified274 by tact211 and sympathy to deal with savages have recognized how hard it is to induce them to disclose their inmost thoughts.160 But much depends upon the sense in which the word Religion is to be understood. The great anthropologist whose writings have given the most powerful impetus275 to the study of primitive culture has taken as his ‘minimum definition of religion’ the belief in spiritual beings;161 and although it might be rash to affirm that materialism276 is inconsistent with religion, and no sympathetic reader would deny that the Latin poet who denounced ‘foul religion’ with such fierce earnestness had a religion of his own, Professor Tylor’s words may serve as our guide.162 It is true that the conception of a spiritual being formed by a primitive mind has hardly anything in common with that approved by a theologian or a philosopher: for the savage, as for Tertullian and Origen, spirits are not immaterial; they are exceedingly subtle, but still corporeal277. Nor, indeed, are they necessarily immortal278. Savage religion is utterly279 different from that which has been the guide of life to men who, though they had put away all hope of everlasting280 life, retained their sense of the nobility of human nature,—‘to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world’; utterly different from that which inspires the idealist to whom theology is a vain thing and the supernatural unreal, but who clings to his belief that man’s punishment or reward hereafter is simply to be what he has become, that his destiny is to grow in grace, lapsing281 perhaps, but again aspiring282, until his spirit becomes one with the indwelling spirit of God. Yet, although the orthodox may refuse the name of religion to an animism begotten283 of fear and unconnected with ethics284, though idealists may scoff285 at the conception of spiritual beings which invests them with bodily form and ponderable and mortal albeit286 ethereal substance, that 51 animism was the seed out of which their own faith—its framework but not its nobler part—was evolved.
He whose mind is informed by the teaching of ethnography may conceive, if he has a sympathetic imagination, the mental state that gave birth to primitive religion; but if his reading has not been wasted, he will understand how vain would be the attempt to ascribe to this or that prehistoric people any known savage creed287. For, alike in origin and in essence, the forms of modern animism are manifold. To the palaeolithic Briton fire, leaping roaring and devouring288, devastating289 flood, rushing wind, lightning flash, disease, death itself,—all may have been animated by spirit, or have been themselves spiritual beings. Elves, goblins, phantoms290 may have been created by his brain, and have seemed to flit before him when prolonged fasting had stimulated the creative power of his fancy. The conceptions that were ultimately to become the greater gods of polytheism may have arisen in his mind as in the minds of other savage men. At least we may believe that, unless he differed greatly from the modern savages whose handiwork resembles his, he began to people the universe with spiritual beings when he became conscious of his own soul; that the phantasms which he saw in dreams were for him real and alive; that every spirit in which he believed originated in the curiosity that led him to seek the cause of every natural phenomenon; that, although social friction had compelled him to recognize a moral code, his religion and his morality were not one but two, not mutually supporting but distinct; and, finally, that no thought of future retribution or reward troubled or comforted his heart.
Totemism.
Intimately connected with primitive religion is totemism, that strange institution which has been observed in various stages of survival among the North American Indians, the forest tribes of South America, the aboriginals291 of Western and Central Australia, the Malays, the hill-tribes of Central India, certain Mongoloid tribes of Central Asia, in Bechuanaland, and in the Bantu district of South Africa;163 which 52 in every case began before those whom it affected had come to domesticate292 animals, to till the earth, or to fashion pottery;164 and which tends to decay when hunting gives place to pasturage.165 One cannot but inquire whether an institution so widespread existed among the prehistoric inhabitants of Britain; and, although no distinct case of totemism has been found or recorded in Europe,166 the inquiry293 is not perhaps so hopeless as it may at first sight appear.
The leading principles of totemism have been so often defined that they are doubtless familiar to many readers. Evidently it originated at a time when men were not possessed by the fancy that they were a distinct branch of creation, but felt their kinship with other animals, which they had hardly begun to regard as inferior.167 The members of the clans294 which form a totemic tribe trace their descent generally from some animal, sometimes even from a plant or an object which we should call inanimate, and bear its name. But how did the conception of relationship between a clan295 and an animal or vegetable species arise? It has been suggested that metempsychosis may supply the explanation. Some great man perhaps gave out that after his death no hare was to be eaten by his clan because a hare would be possessed by his soul. Thus not only his own children and grandchildren but also hares would be his descendants; and he would be the founder8 of a totem-family, which might develop into a totem-clan.168 On the other hand, it has been argued that when totemism began descent was necessarily reckoned in the female line, and that it is therefore useless to search for its origin in anything—for example, ‘a paternal296 soul tenanting an animal’—which was deemed to be inherited from a male ancestor.169 53
Until a recent date it was an article of faith among anthropologists that, except in special circumstances, the life of a totem-animal was, in the eyes of the clan which belonged to it, sacred, and that marriage between the members of any one clan was absolutely tabooed. If a clansman of a Crocodile clan desired a wife, he must seek her from a Wolf clan or from some other. But within the last few years totemism has been carefully and minutely observed among the Arunta tribe of Central Australia; and the records of these observations mark a new era in anthropology297. With the Aruntas totemism does not forbid the slaughter298 of the totem-animal and does not prescribe exogamy: it is based upon the belief that they are descended from ‘quasi-human animal or vegetable ancestors, whose souls are still reborn in human form in successive generations’.170 It has, however, been maintained that in the organization of this tribe there are still discernible traces of totemism of the primitive type, involving both exogamy and respect for the life of the totem-animal;171 and also that their totemism is so decadent299 that nothing can be learned from it as to totemic origins.172
Totemism is indeed a subject of extraordinary difficulty: its literature is enormous and rapidly growing; and it is out of the question in this book to do more than point out its problems, and put the reader in the way of pursuing the study for himself. The problem of its origin can never be solved with certainty; for the institution cannot now be observed in its primitive state; and any attempt to trace it backward must start from conjecture300 as to the original social condition of man.173 Perhaps the most plausible301 and 54 ingenious theory rests upon the assumption, for which considerable evidence has been adduced, that groups of men originally designated one another by animal and plant names, and that these names were accepted even when they were bestowed302 in derision. Such a group, finding itself called, let us say, by the name of the pig, and not knowing how it had come by the name, would naturally believe that there was an intimate connexion between itself and the porcine species.174 The taboos303 which forbade the slaughter of the totem-animal and marriage between a man and a maiden304 of the same kin12 would, it is argued, follow when once the universal belief, that ‘the blood is the life’ and therefore sacred, was evolved.175
There are superstitions305 and names which suggest that totemism may once have existed in Britain; but even if their evidence is accepted, it is of course impossible to point out the source from which they were ultimately derived. They may have belonged to our early Neolithic Age, or they may have been introduced later, when totemism had died out, by invaders306 who had received them from inferior tribes with whom they came in contact. We are assured that Cornish fishermen believe that drowning men sometimes assume the form of animals;176 that in the village of Burchurch in Shropshire it is deemed unlucky to kill a bat;177 that at Great Crosby in Lancashire the goose is held sacred;178 55 and that certain Scottish clans derived their names from animals.179 The familiar passage in which Caesar observes that the Britons counted it impious to taste the flesh of hares, fowls307, and geese180 has also been interpreted as a survival of totemism.181 But this is a mere guess. The greatest of anthropologists has warned us not to assume that every sacred animal is a totem:182 the association with a clan of a species of animals is only one form of animal-worship. It is, however, quite possible that if these animals had once been totems, they were revered308 by clans with whom the ancestors of the British Celts had mixed before they emigrated from Gaul; for broken bones of the hare, which were found in one of the caves of Perthi-Chwareu in Denbighshire, show that at all events in that part of neolithic Britain the animal was eaten.183
Was the domestication309 of animals a result of totemism?
Some anthropologists have argued that the domestication of animals and even agriculture resulted from totemism.184 Thus Monsieur Reinach insists that the domestication of 56 the boar is an irrefragable proof of its former sanctity; for, he argues, if men had always thought themselves entitled to kill and eat boars, boars would never have multiplied under human protection, and become the ancestors of domestic swine. Domestication, he considers, implies a long truce310 between men and animals, something analogous to the Golden Age, celebrated311 by poets of antiquity, in which men were vegetarians312. One may be pardoned for maintaining a sceptical attitude towards a theory which is obviously incapable313 of proof, which to men who live remote from libraries but in the midst of animals presents insuperable difficulties, and which, moreover, seems to imply that prehistoric tribes were excessively stupid. If it were true, one would expect to find that oxen, sheep, and pigs had been reared in the Palaeolithic Age, and that modern totem groups had domesticated314 or were now domesticating315 totem animals. But the only animal which the cave-dwellers of South-Western France apparently domesticated was the horse, which was doubtless lassoed and fastened not because it was sacred but for food;185 and the Aruntas have no domestic animals. A hungry Australian would have no scruple316 in killing317 and eating an animal, not belonging to his own totem-species, which by his wife would be deemed sacred: the Bantus have sheep and oxen, but neither the ox nor the sheep is among their totems. What motive could savages have had for keeping totem-animals in captivity318 in large numbers unless they had desired to eat their flesh or to drink their milk, and why should they have toiled to provide food for them in winter? Why should the domestication of any species be impossible unless the lives of the animals were spared for a long term of years; and why, if every bull and ram192 were suffered to gratify its sexual instincts unchecked, and cows and ewes were 57 unmilked and unused, should they become tame.186 It is surely not incredible that primitive hunters, not belonging to Bull or Boar clans, who saw that wild oxen and wild boars were good for food, should have conceived the idea of ensuring a more constant supply by trapping young animals, taming them, and breeding from them. Totemism may conceivably have had some influence upon the domestication of animals; but it seems probable that there was room for common sense.187 And the mere fact that a piece of sculpture representing an ear of barley319 was found in a cave at Lourdes hardly seems sufficient to justify the conclusion that barley was an object of worship in the Palaeolithic Age, and that its subsequent cultivation320 was due to totemism.188 What we may safely conclude is that exogamy, with which totemism is commonly associated, although they may have been originally distinct, was one of the chief factors in consolidating321 groups and allying them together.189
Magic.
The subject of totemism naturally leads on to that of magic; for in Australia totemic groups have developed into co-operative magic-working societies; and there is no rashness in assuming that magic flourished everywhere before the end of the Palaeolithic Age. We are often told that magic was based upon a confused association of ideas; that it was the embryo322 of science;190 and that priest and magician have ever been foes323. There is much truth in this: but magic is not to be so easily explained; and 58 most of us are still far from sympathetically understanding the mental state in which it originated. To say that one kind of magic is an outgrowth of the law of similarity, the magician fancying, for example, that by making drawings of animals he can cause their species to multiply; that the other depends upon the law of contact, when, for instance, it is supposed that whatever is done to a weapon will correspondingly affect the person whom it wounded,191—to say this is not to fathom the magician’s mind. Magic, notwithstanding the hostility324 with which priests have regarded magicians, cannot be separated from religion by a line of demarcation; nor indeed is it always possible to differentiate325 magicians from priests.192 It has been well said that magic, as observed among primitive tribes, is ‘part and parcel of the “god-stuff” out of which religion fashions itself’.193 Australian magicians believe that their powers are conferred upon them by supernatural beings;194 and the magicians of many tribes call upon spirits to aid them in working their spells.195 One of the most important functions of the magician is to ensure an adequate fall of rain; but in New Guinea this duty belongs to the priest of the god by whose favour the rain is believed to fall.196 Vast learning has been expended326 to prove that monarchy327 originated in magic;197 but we only know that magicians have sometimes succeeded in making themselves kings;198 and doubtless in certain cases magic may have helped to sow the seed out of which gradations of rank were evolved.199 But this would be but one more illustration of the accepted truth that family, tribe, priesthood, monarchy—all our institutions—are rooted in savagery328.200 59
Was there a ‘hiatus’ between the Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Age?
The close of the British Palaeolithic Age is veiled in obscurity. ‘Mesolithic’ implements, whose form might show that they belonged to a period of transition between Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Age, have been diligently329 sought for; and some of the seekers insist that they have found them:201 but the claim has not won general acceptance; and even if it could be established, a doubt would remain whether the makers of those implements belonged to the palaeolithic race of Britain or to a race which had come from abroad after our Palaeolithic Age had passed away. In the words of a high authority202 ‘there appears, in this country at all events, to be a complete gap between the River-drift and Surface Stone Periods, so far as any intermediate forms of implements are concerned; and here at least the race of men who fabricated the oldest of the palaeolithic implements may have, and in all probability had, disappeared at an epoch remote from that when the country was again occupied by those who not only chipped but polished their tools.’ It has been urged by those who would extend this characteristically guarded conclusion that out of forty-eight mammalian species which were living in Britain in the older, only thirty-one survived into the later period; that Britain was united with the Continent in the former, and was an island in the latter; and that in caves which were inhabited in both periods the strata that contained palaeolithic remains were separated by a layer of stalagmite, the formation of which would have required many centuries, from the upper neolithic stratum. But all these arguments do not prove that there was a breach330 of continuity between the two ages. If seventeen mammalian species perished, thirty-one did survive. If Britain was continental in the Palaeolithic Age and insular331 in the Neolithic, the contrast does not exclude the possibility that man survived with his fellow animals from the former into the latter: at the time when the Hoxne implements were lost the land stood only a few feet above its present level,203 and a strait must have separated Britain from Gaul; 60 nor, on the other hand, is it absolutely certain that the earliest neolithic immigrants did not cross the Channel valley on foot. And if the stalagmite which lay between palaeolithic and neolithic implements proved that in certain caves the stage of culture represented by the lower strata was separated by a vast gulf332 of time from that represented by the higher, it still remains possible that some descendants of the primitive hunters may have survived to meet the neolithic invaders. Whoever maintains that there was a ‘hiatus’ between the two stone ages in Britain must frame some theory to account for the disappearance of the palaeolithic race. Either they must have been utterly destroyed by some cataclysm333 which could hardly have been less fatal to the thirty-one mammalian species that survived; or they must have been struck down by a pestilence, such as has never been recorded, that spared none; or they must have died out, although there was no civilized334 race to expedite their fate; or they must one and all have emigrated for some reason which cannot be explained. It is true that in the valley of the Lea near London and at Caddington the old land-surface on which they lived is covered by ‘contorted drift’, above which no undisturbed palaeolithic relics have been found; and it has been supposed that the cold to which the formation of this deposit was due forced the inhabitants to migrate southward. But this evidence has not been taken seriously; and it has also been suggested that the emigration, if it took place, was caused by an outbreak of disease, which, if it was real, may have been merely local. Again, it has been asserted by the most persistent335 advocate of discontinuity that the ‘cave men’ fled in terror before neolithic persecutors;204 that their line of retreat is indicated by implements in the caves of Germany and in refuse heaps of Siberia; and that the extinction336 of certain mammals and the flight of others was due to the change of climate which resulted from the new-born insularity337 of Britain.205 But if the cave-men were driven away by neolithic invaders, what becomes of the alleged338 hiatus? why 61 should implements in Germany and Siberia be connected with British fugitives339? and if mammals abandoned Britain because it had become an island, how did they get away? Somewhere or other the newer was evolved from the older culture: the palaeolithic skeletons which have been found in the caves near Mentone are not distinguishable from those of the same Ligurian coast which were interred in the Neolithic Age;206 and evidence from stratified deposits in the valley of the Seine, lying one above another in unbroken succession, as well as the remarkable340 discoveries at Mas d’Azil and in the Riviera, have convinced the anthropologists of France that in their country a hiatus did not exist.207 Therefore those of us who cling to the belief that the neolithic immigrants who first ventured to launch their frail341 canoes on the narrow Channel and ran them aground on the Kentish coast may have found the new-born island inhabited by men of an older race have some reason to show for our pious faith.
点击收听单词发音
1 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 irrelevant | |
adj.不恰当的,无关系的,不相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 merged | |
(使)混合( merge的过去式和过去分词 ); 相融; 融入; 渐渐消失在某物中 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 neolithic | |
adj.新石器时代的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 descended | |
a.为...后裔的,出身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 pious | |
adj.虔诚的;道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 forefathers | |
n.祖先,先人;祖先,祖宗( forefather的名词复数 );列祖列宗;前人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 kin | |
n.家族,亲属,血缘关系;adj.亲属关系的,同类的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 attainable | |
a.可达到的,可获得的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 ascend | |
vi.渐渐上升,升高;vt.攀登,登上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 implements | |
n.工具( implement的名词复数 );家具;手段;[法律]履行(契约等)v.实现( implement的第三人称单数 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 implement | |
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 appellation | |
n.名称,称呼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 erect | |
n./v.树立,建立,使竖立;adj.直立的,垂直的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 livelihood | |
n.生计,谋生之道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 hood | |
n.头巾,兜帽,覆盖;v.罩上,以头巾覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 savages | |
未开化的人,野蛮人( savage的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 merging | |
合并(分类) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 glaciers | |
冰河,冰川( glacier的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 highland | |
n.(pl.)高地,山地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 rugged | |
adj.高低不平的,粗糙的,粗壮的,强健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 embedded | |
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 tenacious | |
adj.顽强的,固执的,记忆力强的,粘的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 interspersed | |
adj.[医]散开的;点缀的v.intersperse的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 gravels | |
沙砾( gravel的名词复数 ); 砾石; 石子; 结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 gravel | |
n.砂跞;砂砾层;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 interval | |
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 westward | |
n.西方,西部;adj.西方的,向西的;adv.向西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 shrouded | |
v.隐瞒( shroud的过去式和过去分词 );保密 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 boulders | |
n.卵石( boulder的名词复数 );巨砾;(受水或天气侵蚀而成的)巨石;漂砾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 cork | |
n.软木,软木塞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 icebergs | |
n.冰山,流冰( iceberg的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 latitudes | |
纬度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 estuaries | |
(江河入海的)河口,河口湾( estuary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 geologists | |
地质学家,地质学者( geologist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 geologist | |
n.地质学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 marine | |
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 attest | |
vt.证明,证实;表明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 elevation | |
n.高度;海拔;高地;上升;提高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 partially | |
adv.部分地,从某些方面讲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 severed | |
v.切断,断绝( sever的过去式和过去分词 );断,裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 isthmus | |
n.地峡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 epoch | |
n.(新)时代;历元 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 temperate | |
adj.温和的,温带的,自我克制的,不过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 confession | |
n.自白,供认,承认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 compensate | |
vt.补偿,赔偿;酬报 vi.弥补;补偿;抵消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 fathom | |
v.领悟,彻底了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 sojourn | |
v./n.旅居,寄居;逗留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 coalesced | |
v.联合,合并( coalesce的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 tracts | |
大片土地( tract的名词复数 ); 地带; (体内的)道; (尤指宣扬宗教、伦理或政治的)短文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 solitary | |
adj.孤独的,独立的,荒凉的;n.隐士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 clement | |
adj.仁慈的;温和的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 isle | |
n.小岛,岛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 strata | |
n.地层(复数);社会阶层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 shingle | |
n.木瓦板;小招牌(尤指医生或律师挂的营业招牌);v.用木瓦板盖(屋顶);把(女子头发)剪短 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 estuarine | |
河口的,江口的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 disappearance | |
n.消失,消散,失踪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 excavated | |
v.挖掘( excavate的过去式和过去分词 );开凿;挖出;发掘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 excavate | |
vt.挖掘,挖出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 mammoth | |
n.长毛象;adj.长毛象似的,巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 rhinoceros | |
n.犀牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 glutton | |
n.贪食者,好食者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 herd | |
n.兽群,牧群;vt.使集中,把…赶在一起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 herds | |
兽群( herd的名词复数 ); 牧群; 人群; 群众 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 reindeer | |
n.驯鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 climax | |
n.顶点;高潮;v.(使)达到顶点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 tributaries | |
n. 支流 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 excavation | |
n.挖掘,发掘;被挖掘之地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 excavations | |
n.挖掘( excavation的名词复数 );开凿;开凿的洞穴(或山路等);(发掘出来的)古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 attested | |
adj.经检验证明无病的,经检验证明无菌的v.证明( attest的过去式和过去分词 );证实;声称…属实;使宣誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 flora | |
n.(某一地区的)植物群 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 flake | |
v.使成薄片;雪片般落下;n.薄片 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 exhumed | |
v.挖出,发掘出( exhume的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 scarcity | |
n.缺乏,不足,萧条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 alluvial | |
adj.冲积的;淤积的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 torrents | |
n.倾注;奔流( torrent的名词复数 );急流;爆发;连续不断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 impervious | |
adj.不能渗透的,不能穿过的,不易伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 crumbling | |
adj.摇摇欲坠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 stratum | |
n.地层,社会阶层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 denudation | |
n.剥下;裸露;滥伐;剥蚀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 divers | |
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 authentic | |
a.真的,真正的;可靠的,可信的,有根据的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 contention | |
n.争论,争辩,论战;论点,主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 recur | |
vi.复发,重现,再发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 wrought | |
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 authenticity | |
n.真实性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 mingled | |
混合,混入( mingle的过去式和过去分词 ); 混进,与…交往[联系] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 antiquity | |
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 analogous | |
adj.相似的;类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 thither | |
adv.向那里;adj.在那边的,对岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 ardent | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 specimen | |
n.样本,标本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 specimens | |
n.样品( specimen的名词复数 );范例;(化验的)抽样;某种类型的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 notch | |
n.(V字形)槽口,缺口,等级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 foundering | |
v.创始人( founder的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 permissible | |
adj.可允许的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 enthusiasts | |
n.热心人,热衷者( enthusiast的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 enthusiast | |
n.热心人,热衷者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 configuration | |
n.结构,布局,形态,(计算机)配置 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 fig | |
n.无花果(树) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 excavating | |
v.挖掘( excavate的现在分词 );开凿;挖出;发掘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 eastward | |
adv.向东;adj.向东的;n.东方,东部 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 hyena | |
n.土狼,鬣狗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 swell | |
vi.膨胀,肿胀;增长,增强 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 outlet | |
n.出口/路;销路;批发商店;通风口;发泄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 rhinoceroses | |
n.钱,钞票( rhino的名词复数 );犀牛(=rhinoceros);犀牛( rhinoceros的名词复数 );脸皮和犀牛皮一样厚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 elks | |
n.麋鹿( elk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 hippopotamuses | |
n.河马(产于非洲)( hippopotamus的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 hippopotamus | |
n.河马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 grizzly | |
adj.略为灰色的,呈灰色的;n.灰色大熊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 hyenas | |
n.鬣狗( hyena的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 dens | |
n.牙齿,齿状部分;兽窝( den的名词复数 );窝点;休息室;书斋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 sinuous | |
adj.蜿蜒的,迂回的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 recesses | |
n.壁凹( recess的名词复数 );(工作或业务活动的)中止或暂停期间;学校的课间休息;某物内部的凹形空间v.把某物放在墙壁的凹处( recess的第三人称单数 );将(墙)做成凹形,在(墙)上做壁龛;休息,休会,休庭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 prey | |
n.被掠食者,牺牲者,掠食;v.捕食,掠夺,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 impelled | |
v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 exterminated | |
v.消灭,根绝( exterminate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 chronological | |
adj.按年月顺序排列的,年代学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 astronomical | |
adj.天文学的,(数字)极大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 stultify | |
v.愚弄;使呆滞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 stimulated | |
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 relics | |
[pl.]n.遗物,遗迹,遗产;遗体,尸骸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 cape | |
n.海角,岬;披肩,短披风 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 dwellers | |
n.居民,居住者( dweller的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 skulls | |
颅骨( skull的名词复数 ); 脑袋; 脑子; 脑瓜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 skull | |
n.头骨;颅骨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 projection | |
n.发射,计划,突出部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 jaw | |
n.颚,颌,说教,流言蜚语;v.喋喋不休,教训 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 unearthed | |
出土的(考古) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 cavern | |
n.洞穴,大山洞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 jaws | |
n.口部;嘴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 ridges | |
n.脊( ridge的名词复数 );山脊;脊状突起;大气层的)高压脊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 animated | |
adj.生气勃勃的,活跃的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 anthropologist | |
n.人类学家,人类学者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 influential | |
adj.有影响的,有权势的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 lodge | |
v.临时住宿,寄宿,寄存,容纳;n.传达室,小旅馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 forerunners | |
n.先驱( forerunner的名词复数 );开路人;先兆;前兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 adorning | |
修饰,装饰物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 tusks | |
n.(象等动物的)长牙( tusk的名词复数 );獠牙;尖形物;尖头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 salmon | |
n.鲑,大马哈鱼,橙红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 robin | |
n.知更鸟,红襟鸟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 likeness | |
n.相像,相似(之处) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 emigrants | |
n.(从本国移往他国的)移民( emigrant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 nomads | |
n.游牧部落的一员( nomad的名词复数 );流浪者;游牧生活;流浪生活 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 Ford | |
n.浅滩,水浅可涉处;v.涉水,涉过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 belongings | |
n.私人物品,私人财物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 rudiments | |
n.基础知识,入门 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 elevations | |
(水平或数量)提高( elevation的名词复数 ); 高地; 海拔; 提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 wading | |
(从水、泥等)蹚,走过,跋( wade的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 situated | |
adj.坐落在...的,处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 profusion | |
n.挥霍;丰富 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 espied | |
v.看到( espy的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 harpoons | |
n.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的名词复数 )v.鱼镖,鱼叉( harpoon的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 fauna | |
n.(一个地区或时代的)所有动物,动物区系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 perishable | |
adj.(尤指食物)易腐的,易坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 ram | |
(random access memory)随机存取存储器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 commingled | |
v.混合,掺和,合并( commingle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 gauge | |
v.精确计量;估计;n.标准度量;计量器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 craftsmen | |
n. 技工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 plied | |
v.使用(工具)( ply的过去式和过去分词 );经常供应(食物、饮料);固定往来;经营生意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 apprehend | |
vt.理解,领悟,逮捕,拘捕,忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 conversant | |
adj.亲近的,有交情的,熟悉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 pebbles | |
[复数]鹅卵石; 沙砾; 卵石,小圆石( pebble的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 flakes | |
小薄片( flake的名词复数 ); (尤指)碎片; 雪花; 古怪的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 dressing | |
n.(食物)调料;包扎伤口的用品,敷料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 truncated | |
adj.切去顶端的,缩短了的,被删节的v.截面的( truncate的过去式和过去分词 );截头的;缩短了的;截去顶端或末端 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 butt | |
n.笑柄;烟蒂;枪托;臀部;v.用头撞或顶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 triangular | |
adj.三角(形)的,三者间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 utensils | |
器具,用具,器皿( utensil的名词复数 ); 器物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 vessels | |
n.血管( vessel的名词复数 );船;容器;(具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的)人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 makers | |
n.制造者,制造商(maker的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 tact | |
n.机敏,圆滑,得体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 toiled | |
长时间或辛苦地工作( toil的过去式和过去分词 ); 艰难缓慢地移动,跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 sediment | |
n.沉淀,沉渣,沉积(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 anvils | |
n.(铁)砧( anvil的名词复数 );砧骨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 abode | |
n.住处,住所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 flaked | |
精疲力竭的,失去知觉的,睡去的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 obliterated | |
v.除去( obliterate的过去式和过去分词 );涂去;擦掉;彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 inquisitive | |
adj.求知欲强的,好奇的,好寻根究底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 scooped | |
v.抢先报道( scoop的过去式和过去分词 );(敏捷地)抱起;抢先获得;用铲[勺]等挖(洞等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 subsisted | |
v.(靠很少的钱或食物)维持生活,生存下去( subsist的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 marvel | |
vi.(at)惊叹vt.感到惊异;n.令人惊异的事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 stagnation | |
n. 停滞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 laboriously | |
adv.艰苦地;费力地;辛勤地;(文体等)佶屈聱牙地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 retrospect | |
n.回顾,追溯;v.回顾,回想,追溯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 retardation | |
n.智力迟钝,精神发育迟缓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 augmenting | |
使扩张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 pottery | |
n.陶器,陶器场 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 otter | |
n.水獭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 engraving | |
n.版画;雕刻(作品);雕刻艺术;镌版术v.在(硬物)上雕刻(字,画等)( engrave的现在分词 );将某事物深深印在(记忆或头脑中) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 depict | |
vt.描画,描绘;描写,描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 impaled | |
钉在尖桩上( impale的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 sustenance | |
n.食物,粮食;生活资料;生计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 ledges | |
n.(墙壁,悬崖等)突出的狭长部分( ledge的名词复数 );(平窄的)壁架;横档;(尤指)窗台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 dwellings | |
n.住处,处所( dwelling的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 boughs | |
大树枝( bough的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 friction | |
n.摩擦,摩擦力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 tempted | |
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 palatable | |
adj.可口的,美味的;惬意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 strewed | |
v.撒在…上( strew的过去式和过去分词 );散落于;点缀;撒满 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 marrow | |
n.骨髓;精华;活力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 prehistoric | |
adj.(有记载的)历史以前的,史前的,古老的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 adorned | |
[计]被修饰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 engraved | |
v.在(硬物)上雕刻(字,画等)( engrave的过去式和过去分词 );将某事物深深印在(记忆或头脑中) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 interred | |
v.埋,葬( inter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 destitute | |
adj.缺乏的;穷困的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 sketches | |
n.草图( sketch的名词复数 );素描;速写;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 ingenuity | |
n.别出心裁;善于发明创造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 fecundity | |
n.生产力;丰富 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 talismans | |
n.护身符( talisman的名词复数 );驱邪物;有不可思议的力量之物;法宝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 edible | |
n.食品,食物;adj.可食用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 utilitarian | |
adj.实用的,功利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 depicting | |
描绘,描画( depict的现在分词 ); 描述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 ascertained | |
v.弄清,确定,查明( ascertain的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 kindled | |
(使某物)燃烧,着火( kindle的过去式和过去分词 ); 激起(感情等); 发亮,放光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 malignant | |
adj.恶性的,致命的;恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 dread | |
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 trumpeting | |
大声说出或宣告(trumpet的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 bellowing | |
v.发出吼叫声,咆哮(尤指因痛苦)( bellow的现在分词 );(愤怒地)说出(某事),大叫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 pestilence | |
n.瘟疫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 famished | |
adj.饥饿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 slain | |
杀死,宰杀,杀戮( slay的过去分词 ); (slay的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 corpses | |
n.死尸,尸体( corpse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 ornaments | |
n.装饰( ornament的名词复数 );点缀;装饰品;首饰v.装饰,点缀,美化( ornament的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 analogues | |
相似物( analogue的名词复数 ); 类似物; 类比; 同源词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 intercourse | |
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 qualified | |
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 impetus | |
n.推动,促进,刺激;推动力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 materialism | |
n.[哲]唯物主义,唯物论;物质至上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 corporeal | |
adj.肉体的,身体的;物质的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 lapsing | |
v.退步( lapse的现在分词 );陷入;倒退;丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 aspiring | |
adj.有志气的;有抱负的;高耸的v.渴望;追求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 begotten | |
v.为…之生父( beget的过去分词 );产生,引起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 scoff | |
n.嘲笑,笑柄,愚弄;v.嘲笑,嘲弄,愚弄,狼吞虎咽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 albeit | |
conj.即使;纵使;虽然 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 creed | |
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 devouring | |
吞没( devour的现在分词 ); 耗尽; 津津有味地看; 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 phantoms | |
n.鬼怪,幽灵( phantom的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 aboriginals | |
(某国的)公民( aboriginal的名词复数 ); 土著人特征; 土生动物(或植物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 domesticate | |
vt.驯养;使归化,使专注于家务 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 clans | |
宗族( clan的名词复数 ); 氏族; 庞大的家族; 宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 clan | |
n.氏族,部落,宗族,家族,宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 paternal | |
adj.父亲的,像父亲的,父系的,父方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 anthropology | |
n.人类学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 slaughter | |
n.屠杀,屠宰;vt.屠杀,宰杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 decadent | |
adj.颓废的,衰落的,堕落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 conjecture | |
n./v.推测,猜测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 plausible | |
adj.似真实的,似乎有理的,似乎可信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 bestowed | |
赠给,授予( bestow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 taboos | |
禁忌( taboo的名词复数 ); 忌讳; 戒律; 禁忌的事物(或行为) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 maiden | |
n.少女,处女;adj.未婚的,纯洁的,无经验的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 superstitions | |
迷信,迷信行为( superstition的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 invaders | |
入侵者,侵略者,侵入物( invader的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 fowls | |
鸟( fowl的名词复数 ); 禽肉; 既不是这; 非驴非马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 revered | |
v.崇敬,尊崇,敬畏( revere的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 domestication | |
n.驯养,驯化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 truce | |
n.休战,(争执,烦恼等的)缓和;v.以停战结束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 vegetarians | |
n.吃素的人( vegetarian的名词复数 );素食者;素食主义者;食草动物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 incapable | |
adj.无能力的,不能做某事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 domesticated | |
adj.喜欢家庭生活的;(指动物)被驯养了的v.驯化( domesticate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 domesticating | |
v.驯化( domesticate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 scruple | |
n./v.顾忌,迟疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 captivity | |
n.囚禁;被俘;束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 barley | |
n.大麦,大麦粒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 cultivation | |
n.耕作,培养,栽培(法),养成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 consolidating | |
v.(使)巩固, (使)加强( consolidate的现在分词 );(使)合并 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 embryo | |
n.胚胎,萌芽的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 foes | |
敌人,仇敌( foe的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 hostility | |
n.敌对,敌意;抵制[pl.]交战,战争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 differentiate | |
vi.(between)区分;vt.区别;使不同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 savagery | |
n.野性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 diligently | |
ad.industriously;carefully | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 breach | |
n.违反,不履行;破裂;vt.冲破,攻破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 insular | |
adj.岛屿的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 cataclysm | |
n.洪水,剧变,大灾难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 persistent | |
adj.坚持不懈的,执意的;持续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337 insularity | |
n.心胸狭窄;孤立;偏狭;岛国根性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339 fugitives | |
n.亡命者,逃命者( fugitive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341 frail | |
adj.身体虚弱的;易损坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |