It is here when touch involves representation and becomes a sign of something, e.g., edible thing, that desire and other simple emotions originate. A possibility of pleasurable experience being recognised, it is necessary, if useful action would follow, that emotion springs up as incentive22, and this emotion we term desire. Hunger drives, but desire draws, and as reinforcement and guide to the blind hunger impulse desire has a large function. A mere14 indifferent recognition, the pleasurable foreseen 194but not felt about, would be entirely23 unserviceable. If we do not desire the pleasurable and beneficial, we do not act for it. And originally, at least, perception of the good always stirred desire; and desire was awakened24 in no other way; for in the course of natural evolution, knowledge and emotions have alike to be interpreted in their origin and meaning with reference to advantageous26 action, this alone being the arena27 of natural selection. A meaningless knowledge and a self-contained emotion or feeling, are entirely contrary to the trend of evolution on the basis we have assumed. Moreover, through ages of activity the tendency to desire the good and the good only becomes so ingrained that I think it hardly fails, even in the highest and latest minds. The most hyper-conscious man, once convinced that something will give him pleasant experience, so long and so far as this feeling is dominant28 in mind will have incipient29 desire.
On this long disputed question of the relation of desire to the good or pleasurable, evolutionary30 psychology31, which views mind as serving life, as interpreting things with reference to their serviceability and so implied pleasurability, always bases desire in its origin and growth on pleasure. But is this general point of view borne out by the facts of mind? A typical example of common desire is this: At a fair I observe a toboggan chute and say to my companion, “That must be sport, how would you like to try it?” The appeal to “sport” awakens32 desire in my comrade and he says, “Let’s try it.” We test its pleasurability, and, enjoying it, desire to go again. It is evident that desire arises not on the mere image of actualization as such, the idea of sliding, but on conception of its pleasure quality. Whenever by our own experience or by the testimony33 of others we are assured of a good thing to be experienced we straightway desire it.
This, it may be said, is all very true for a certain class of desires, but the principle does not apply in the higher 195desires like the desire for knowledge. But knowledge originates only as serviceable, and primarily only serviceable knowledges are desired. We desire knowledge only so far as it is worth having, and it may be that I esteem34 all knowledge as worth something and so desirable. However, some knowledges are worth nothing and are never desired. Who wants to know the exact measurements of the pebbles35 on the road, or how many hairs are on the mane of his neighbour’s pony36, or the names of all the inhabitants of Pekin? But if one thinks it would be any satisfaction to know such facts, he may desire to know them. The insatiable curiosity of children which seeks to know all such irrelevant37 facts hardly comes under the category of desire, but is rather instinctive38 hereditary39 impulse. It has no clear idea of a thing to be known and a desire to know it, but is only a spontaneous outburst of knowing activity which is inbred and comes from ancestral integration40. There is a sensing and perceiving activity which is very intense at the questioning age, but which hardly implies the desire to know. The incessant3 “What’s this?” “What’s that?” is merely outcome of an instinctive impulsion to interpret environment; it is not significant of full-formed desire, there is no idea of thing to be known, of an actualization to be accomplished41.
If a man desires knowledge, not for his own sake, but for its own sake, desire as such really ceases, it merges42 into love and devotion, which are disinterested43 and clearly distinct as mental modes from desire. Desire is not a sentiment; and it does not properly include all impulse to actualization. For instance, the feeling for actualization merely as such, for achievement of ideal per se, is beyond the biologic stage of consciousness wherein desire has its chief function. The attainment45 of end merely for the sake of the end must be distinguished46 from actualizing an image for the pleasure of actualization, which thus has desire element. We know that the image of realization 196may act as end by compulsion, as in feeling of duty, which is thus marked off from desire as impulsion. Thus desire is but one mode of teleological47 emotion. But desire is emotion at unrealized good and not at unrealization in general.
Spinoza’s dictum, followed by Volkmann, that we do not desire a thing because we deem it good, but we deem it good because we desire it, is not borne out by the commonest facts. A peddler shows me an apple, but I do not desire it and then deem it good, but I examine it, and if it seems good I may desire and buy it, but if bad, I have aversion, and return it. My desire thus depends altogether upon whether or not I deem the apple good, and not my deeming it good upon my desire. If I see any one desiring anything I at once judge that he first thought it good or he would not have desired it. All the excitation of desire is by representation of the good. The merchant tempts49 you by exhibiting his goods, the child with candy offers it to you crying, “good! good!” the moralist proclaims, “do this and thou shalt live.” The cause of desire, which for weal or woe50 plays such a large part in almost all psychism51, is always by imaging the good. The bait and the reward as excitants of desire are most common; a mere suggestion of a representation without implication of its goodliness in realization does not excite desire. Thus some one, speaking of a totally unknown town, asks, “How would you like to live in Perry?” and we answer, “Is it a pleasant town?” A mere suggestion of change of abode54 starts desire only when there is already displeasure with present residence, and so desire for release as a good; but image of actualization considered solely55 by itself is desireless. And if to excite desire we offer the good or pleasurable, to extinguish desire we offer the bad and painful. I desire a fair looking apple, but cutting it and finding it wormy and rotten, desire flees. I extinguish the desire of a child for 197eating some noxious56 substance by assuring it of the bad taste and nauseating57 effect. Both positively58 and negatively then, common sense finds the basis, not of the good in desire, but of desire in the good. The facts in both exciting and extinguishing desire point to this conclusion.
Spinoza (Ethics59 iii., Prop6 ix.) defines desire as “appetite with consciousness thereof.” But to be aware of being hungry is but the first step toward desire. In the midst of my daily occupations I become aware of pain, then of uneasiness, then of hunger, whereupon I may desire food, which desire includes as distinct elements: (1) idea of eating as act or movement; (2) idea of the thing eaten as food, a something satisfying; affording relief, and so a good; (3) thereupon the emotion wave of longing60, the essential point in desire. This is, of course, followed by volition61, I act to realize, I go to a restaurant. When H?ffding (Psychology, p. 323) says that the impulse in hunger “has reference primarily to the food, not to the feeling of pleasure in its consumption,” he forgets that “food” is a something satisfying, and only thus is desired. Object is not desired as object, but for its value in experience.
We must also touch upon a certain class of experiences which have been adduced as showing a desire not based upon the idea of the pleasure. Take the example of a man in ennui62 who takes to playing tennis as a relief, but with no desire of being victorious63. Engaging in the game he finds that “this desire which does not exist at first is stimulated64 to considerable intensity66 by the competition itself; and in proportion as it is thus stimulated both the mere contest becomes more pleasurable, and the victory, which was originally indifferent, comes to afford a keen enjoyment67.” (Sidgwick, Methods of Ethics, p. 46.) But does the desire really come from some idea of pleasure? The player volleys a ball successfully against his opponent, and thereby69 receiving a thrill of pleasure desire awakes 198to beat. “Wouldn’t I like to beat him? I would enjoy nothing better.” This desire foresees the pleasure of triumph. If he gets no pleasure from returning the ball successfully he does not desire success; but if unanticipated pleasure comes up in beating his opponent, as soon as he recognises this pleasure he desires to continue and complete it. This pleasure in succeeding in competitive activity, extremely old and integrated from all the struggle of existence, springs up spontaneously. There may also be added pleasure from activity and pleasure from skill which will make the game very interesting, i.e., full of desire and other emotions.
Professor Sidgwick allows that pleasure may be the cause of desire, but not its object. But surely if I cognize pleasure coming from an act, I attach this pleasure to it in representation; if I take pleasure from returning a tennis ball and then represent a coming opportunity to return the ball I also represent its pleasurability. Pleasure or pain connected with acts is connected by association with representation of the acts, the pleasure-pain tone penetrates70 the representation, and only thus does actualization of an image become object of desire. If it is possible to conceive an activity indifferent—which may be doubted—we should have no emotion about it. But we have already sufficiently71 emphasized how the perceived experience quality of things determines desire and all emotion.
Professor Sidgwick’s remark that the pleasurableness of the contest is “in proportion” (Ibid., p. 46) to the desire, i.e., that the pleasure results from the desire rather than desire from the pleasure, also shows defective72 analysis. If I desire intensely to beat, and am on the losing side, I am greatly pained, for desire is always in itself painful. In any case desire is pleasurable only so far as it is being satisfied, which, of course, means only so far as desire is being extinguished. It is not the increasing desire intensity, 199but the decreasing, that gives pleasure, i.e., desire is negatively related to pleasure. Intense desire may act as excitement-pleasure, but this does not bear on the nature of desire.
Another objection that has been brought up against pleasure as desire basis is that “pleasures are diminished by repetition, whilst habits are strengthened by it; if the intensity of desire therefore were proportioned to the ‘pleasure value’ of its gratification, the desire for renewed gratification should diminish as this pleasure grows less, but if the present pain of restraint from action determines the intensity of desire, this should increase as the action becomes habitual73.” (James Ward52 in Encyclop?dia Britannica, vol. xx., p. 79.)
But pleasure and so also desire often increases with repetition. One who tastes champagne74 for the first time may receive slight pleasure. The next time he dines out he will, with image of his previous experience, have slight desire for champagne. As experience is repeated his pleasure and desire may increase to ecstasy75 and passion. But habits not obviously pleasure-yielding, as the morning chore to the country lad, will be desired after intermittance; the country boy homesick in the city longs in the morning for the familiar scene and familiar task which was a source of aversion at home. We painfully miss the customary, even the painful customary, for thereby the conservative tendency of nature and organic activity is broken up. Desire arises for relief from this pain, and the habitual is so far regarded as pleasurable. Thus desire is in proportion to the “restraint” only so far as the restraint is painful, and thus relief appears pleasurable. Thus the desire for the habitual has, like other desire, its basis in prospective76 pleasure.
That the analysis of desire as regards representation of pleasure is still an open question certainly marks the psychology of feeling as very backward; that here is a 200most common and prominent psychosis, whose simplest analysis is not yet agreed upon, shows how far we yet are from a standard of subjective verification. I have expressed my own opinion that both the evolutionary standpoint and special analysis indicate a distinct emotion at prospective good which is best denominated by the term desire. This is a purely78 psychological result, and has absolutely no reference to ethics. “Pleasure” has such an inevitable79 ethical80 tinge81 that a purely scientific denotation82 would be useful. The “good” is a better, but also objectionable term. That then the organism should foresee and image the good and should have a feeling about it which should stimulate65 will to its appropriation and realization is a psychosis of utmost value, and one which is in all psychism above the lowest an extremely common phenomenon. This does not assert that desire in all its lower range is a seeking for pleasure, an extremely late conception and endeavour; but it means that as perception is of things in their experience values, so representation also, as giving the basis of desire; but a conscious hedonism is still afar off.
The general function which desire subserves in stimulating83 advantageous action is obvious. As anger and fear are primarily useful emotions in view of potential pain and harm, so desire in view of potential pleasure and benefit.
The function of desire in stimulating advantageous action is obvious. Desire answers to potential pleasure and benefit just as anger does to potential pain and harm. It is a correlative and supplement of fear, and in general the more one fears a thing the more one desires the opposite. When sailing I desire fair weather in proportion as I fear a squall. Desire is the very spring of life and progress, and when desire is extinguished the will to live ceases, and psychic life declines and dies. Fulness of desire is fulness of life, and the largest mental life is 201that in which desire, constant, multiplex, and far-reaching, is strong and dominant. Desire seems thus to be a permanent factor, and, though there is a pre-desire period, no post-desire age seems to be indicated in psychic history so far.
Somewhat as to the analysis of desire has already been intimated in touching upon its origin and function, but we are now to study its elements more in detail. The very young infant certainly experiences hunger pains in almost its initial consciousness; but it is only gradually that the need felt leads up to presentation and representation of the needed thing, and so to desire. Hunger with it, as with all organisms, sharpens the wits, and leads to knowing things, interpreting them, and acting84 definitely toward them. Through touch it first comes to appreciate object, and object as food, a representative–inductive act. The earliest meaning attached to object is edibility, and this, indeed, indiscriminately to all objects, as we see that infants mouth everything. Gradually from this, or by dint85 of a good deal of unpleasant experience, objects are divided into edible and non-edible, the primitive86 classification of things.
From the consideration of any such simple example as the desire for food we determine that the first element toward and in desire is a lack-pain generating felt want, and so—and such common use of words is significant—we want, i.e., desire what we are in want of. A feeling of need or lack is fundamental. Now sense of lack is more than pain from restriction87 or intermission, for it implies a measure of in-ground integrated experience with objects, a constant connecting of object with purely subjective experience. For instance, hunger and feeling the need of food, the craving88 for food, are not the same, for it is evident that to feel lack of anything with such a central pain as hunger-pain means that this something has often been conjoined with the pain experience. 202Hunger is primarily an organic uneasiness and gnawing89 pain which does not include any sense of object as of a food or reference thereto. Our subjective and objective experience have been so completely integrated, and feeling of lack and that for a very definite thing has become so ingrained in mind with pains, we feel so spontaneously and immediately need of thing in connection with organic pains that it is very difficult for us to realize a state where this connection has not been formed or is forming. But it would seem that the first hunger pains of the infant are of this primitive quality, and that need is not felt in connection therewith. It is only after some crude cognitions of bodies have been generated in connection with the feeding act and as guides thereto that on occasion of hunger pains there can occur the sense of lack of food object, a painful feeling of unrealization, at first very dimly representative, and so a craving, an incipient emotion. Desire rests then upon capacity to feel the lack of accustomed satisfying thing in connection with some form of perception or representation of the thing. When a satisfying object is missing, it must be missed psychically92 before desire can awake. The reaction when a customarily conjoined experience does not occur is a peculiar93 feeling in mind, a disturbance94, uneasiness, a unique sense of loss and lack which is the immediate90 stimulus95 of desire. Hunger at first leads blindly to activities tending to satisfy hunger, but the satisfying thing—food—therewith becomes gradually known, hence thereafter when hunger comes there is struggle both to know and to act thereby. This struggle has impulsation from feelings of lack.
Lack pains then prompt to cognitive96 activities to find the thing lacked and desired. The first knowledge is that some things satisfy, and an appropriative activity is excited. The lowest organisms under impulse of hunger pains reach out after things, feel for them, and as soon as they sense the edible, appropriate it. It is quite evident that they 203exercise cognition only as driven to it, and then it is effort even for the simplest knowing. But what the first psychic facts are is hard for us to interpret, because we have progressed so far beyond them. However, we may well believe that the general form of primitive consciousness is akin53 to what we have when dozing97 or half awake. The realization of things is dim indefinite, and it is only as pains of considerable severity are felt and as the psychism gains in capacity for pain that particular knowledges and particular needs and desires are accomplished. After having repeatedly sensed something—as a soft vegetable form—in connection with bodily pain as hunger and with the feeding activity as allaying98 hunger, a renewal99 of the pain from organic conditions will give, not merely purely subjective pains, but also, as the pre-associated cognition of thing and the allaying of hunger is not experienced, there arises as reaction a vague sense of lack which may lead to equally vague desire. A vague uneasiness and restlessness which knows object and misses object only in the most general way is the lowest basis. A study of some case of waking from a doze100 by reason of hunger would give the original formation of desire as involving lack sense. Here a purely subjective pain gradually intensifies101 till it wakens a very general objectifying, and we feel need of undefined something, which soon becomes specialized102, when fully68 wakened, to need of something to eat, and finally as need of some particular usual food, as bread, meat, or milk, which is then desired.
Pain from restriction or intermission of some organic activity, as the digestive and assimilatory, may then lead to sense of lack and desire for object which is unrealized. However, craving-desire as implying sense of loss, of something pleasurable missed, is not organic, but is mere reflex of organization. It is not progressive, but conservative; it does not initiate103, it merely keeps the organism to its accustomed level. This is the limited range of appetite. 204Craving rests on past evolution. However, we have to explain the origin of those activities which, when intermitted, produce such distressful104 results. We must first acquire the liking105 before we miss what we like, and tastes uniformly originate through effort, and all pleasurable activity is built up by painful volition as urged by direct pains or by desires. Desire then is more than craving. Craving as based on organic lack is satiable, desire is insatiable. We desire what we have never missed and modes of experience we have never attained106. We, who have never had a gold watch, desire one, and having received one, we lose it, miss it, and so desire is reinforced. All the progressive activity of the human world originates in desire, as ambition, or as desire of truth, virtue107, etc. Here we do not miss what we are accustomed to, but we are forming habits, which will be the basis for cravings with descendants. For instance, one who now does not miss beauty of art, but is ambitiously striving to appreciate art, may come finally—or at least his descendants—to miss art, and so to crave108 it. But for the time he has no art craving, only an art desire. Of course all desire in the craving form, or in the higher desire form, involves a missing actualization. All desire is extinguished in realization. But this obviously does not destroy the distinction of desire as based on craving, a spontaneous resultant from integration, an intermittence109 of habit, and desire as itself integrating habit-forming emotion.
However, with the lowest psychisms, we may perhaps suppose it unlikely that representation does ever become definite enough for desire, except when in direct sensing of a thing, as, for example, in a touch perception. The psychism is impelled110 to touch activity by its subjective pains and simple, undifferentiated lack pains. It does not desire a food through the representation of it brought up by hunger, for such representation of things in their potentiality is probably not originally stimulated directly 205by subjective feelings, though with man, for instance, we know that hunger and other simple feelings will provoke representations of foods, which foods will be desired; and particularly in famine the most lively representations of feasts occur, and thus there is a strengthening and defining of desire. Thus in famine there comes a greater and greater urgency to action as its necessity becomes greater. The vivid representations of foods become through desire—though there may be no sense connection with food—a mighty112 force for self-preservative action.
Yet primitively113 desire probably awoke only after some sensing was accomplished, not the mere subjective pain, but the touch perception awoke the representation, for it would seem the original status that representation occurs at first only with correlated presentation. Thus it is that the simplest psychisms are driven by their pains to achieve a touch or some sensing of a thing before they interpret it as food, and so desire it; that is, things must have a food meaning attached to them through actual sense appreciation114 of them as such, before they can be directly instanced in pure representation as foods. Hunger leads us immediately to think of food, but this ability to directly represent food is based upon having thoroughly115 learned certain things as food by repeated direct experiences. A savage116 who has never seen or known of bonbons118 is presented with a box of them, and he may receive them with indifference119, but a bonbon117 is placed in his mouth, whereupon he says, “it tasted so good, I want another.” Such is the genesis of desire when pleasure quality is attached to thing, is learned by experience. The visual and tactual experience is actively120 conjoined with pleasure experience, so that seeing another bonbon, he represents its pleasurability and so desires it.
Further, the relative presentations and feelings must be mentally correlative, the connection must be more than phenomenal series of several forms; there must be an 206active connecting psychic process as basis. You are told to open your mouth and shut your eyes, and a bonbon is dropped in; the taste will at once give rise to a revival121 visual presentation, and if a person holds up before your eyes a fine bonbon, saying, “look at this,” there may occur revival taste experiences. But the immediate basis of desire is not here, for if psychic process stopped here, there would be no higher elements; these can only be accomplished by a definite bringing up and attribution of subjective quality to the thing. You represent its possible pleasurableness on the basis of past experience, by the action of the inductive instinct, a complex process. Here revival is not an active correlating, but is self-contained, lying isolated122 by itself, and unfruitful till its revival character is recognised, and it is actively wrought123 into experience. That is, integrating act is presupposed in all desire.
The way in which revival becomes the basis representation is hard to trace, but in many cases it seems to be connected with certain physiological124 activities. A revival form implies correlated physical functions, as when the sight of a peach causes the taste pre-experienced therewith to be revived, and the mouth waters, as if in actual deglutition. As the reacting and assimilating process is carried on without any real thing to be acted upon, there comes a physiological reaction, which in turn gives rise to peculiar psychic affections, and specially125 the uneasy feeling of lack. The unreality and mere revival character of the revival experience is ultimately recognised, and representation becomes possible, and idea of pleasure as both experienced and experienceable is evolved. Thus an unsubstantial revival, where the thing is sensed in one form only, but thereby re-awakening other associated experiences, as in the case of merely seeing a peach, leads finally to know the thing as a potency126; I taste, but after all I taste nothing; hence I am led to perceive the thing as a sign, 207as unrealized in its pleasure significance, but realizable. How we attain44 sense of reality and unreality we discuss in chapter on Induction127, but with special reference to desire we add here an illustration. When engaged in reading on a hot day, I have feeling of discomfort128, and then spontaneously arises image of a wonted bathing place, I have the image of moving in the clear, cool water, but at once recognising the unreality of the image, I long for realization. I, when heated, have so often seen the water, and plunged129 in it, that the presentation of mode of relief has become firmly associated with the discomfort, so when it organically returns, presentation revives, and its unreality known, desire rises. One not accustomed to bathe, but to taking lemonade when heated, will have visions of lemonade and desire therefor. One who is just forming some habit of relief will not have spontaneous images, but must call them up. Desire also will be purely general, “Oh! to get rid of this heat.” Specific desire, as founded upon a definite image of realization, is primarily the result of active association of definite object and mode with a given pleasure-pain state. The realizing the image as unreality, as suggesting an actualization to be wished for, is learned from rude experience with present sensations and perceptions quite at variance130 with the image. Thus, that the vision of water is unreality I know by seeing the room before me, touching the chair, sense of painful heat unrelieved, etc. An image of actualization barely of itself does not include desire. I may conceive that I can image myself moving in water without any emotion therewith connected, but as matter of fact, this never occurs; all our images of actualization carry some desire value. Even bare phantasy, as imagining myself living on the moon, is not without a tinge of desire or aversion, for the origin and growth of imaging has been so bound up with desire, and is for desire as life function that some desire tendency is retained even in the purest flights of imagination. 208It becomes increasingly evident that such a simple and understandable expression as, “I want that peach,” implies a great complexity131 of psychic process which is hidden from us by the summarizing facility of language. Emotion is evidently far too complex for full analysis. Its complexity is such that we may well hesitate to attribute it, as is so often and easily done, to the lowest psychisms. Since desire includes a measure of self-consciousness, and also of consciousness of pleasure, it seems improbable at first sight that such elements should exist in certain low consciousnesses where primitive organisms seem impelled by desire. However, though this a priori view has weight, it must not be allowed to be of supreme132 value. Yet when we fairly interpret a very simple case, as when a dog scenting133 and seeing meat on a shelf, is said to desire it, and so to spring for it, we certainly imply a complexity of mental activity, which might by many be thought quite beyond the power of even a very intelligent dog. We have at least the following factors:—
1. Simple scent134 or vision of the thing; bare presentation or representation of object.
2. Either a definite bringing up, or a mechanical re-occurrence of past pleasurable associated feelings and sensations, or both.
3. Sense of unreality.
4 Feeling of lack.
5. Pain of lack.
6. Sense of pleasure potentiality of the thing, which implies—
(a) Idea of pleasure.
(b) Idea of personal experience thereof, i.e., some egoistic sense.
(c) Sense of experience as in time past, as experienced.
(d) Sense of time as future as implied in sense of the experienceable.
2097. The longing, yearning135, peculiar desire quality as feeling mode.
8. Desire pain.
In the first place then, the object of desire, the desideratum, is not the object as such. We do not desire things merely as such, but only as far as they are significant of experience. Presentation does not, at least normally and originally, ever end in itself, but it is always connected, and connects with pleasure-pain experiences. Desire begins by being vague as to its object; under slight pressures of pain we want something, but we know not what; we have dim, undefined longing, but the indefinite object is always a possibility of experience, a centre of pleasure-pain potency. At the first stirring of hunger pains, we have a vague uneasiness and sense of lack, with a most general idea of object and longing toward it, and suffer the pain from hunger. We may be physiologically136 hungry without feeling hungry, and so may have a desire of thing in general to remove pain before the pain is felt and recognised in its particularity as hunger pain. When hunger comes, or, primitively, is achieved, then we want something to eat; and as this feeling intensifies, the craving becomes more and more definite as to object; bread, etc., is wanted, and in famine hunger there is the most particular representation, as of certain dishes formerly eaten with great relish137. Lumholtz, wandering famished138 on a Christmas in the wilds of Australia, thinks of the puddings in his native Norway. The evolutionary significance of this increasing definition of object in desire is obvious in that greater definiteness and accuracy of self-preservative action is thereby assured.
As far as the nature of the emotion desire goes, it seems quite indifferent whether there is presentation or representation of object. I desire equally, whether I actually see the bonbon on the table or when I merely represent it—see it in my mind’s eye.
210Primarily then, and always, even in the latest evolution, as tendency at least, the desire is for the pleasure in the object, and desire is excited by every representation of the pleasurable. If one says, “I can look upon pleasure without desire,” we may well question whether there is really personal pleasure represented. Dancing, card-playing, wine-drinking, may be pleasures which do not attract me because I do not care for them; and by such a statement we indicate the practical parallelism of pleasure and desire which is forced upon common introspection. If you care for it, it is a pleasure to you; if you do not care for it, it is not a pleasure to you; such is the result of common observation, and a very just conclusion so far as I can see. To excite desire, we naturally suggest the pleasurable. One person persuading another to go to a party says: “I know you would have a good time.” When one answers, “I know that I would have a good time, but I dread139 the trouble of getting ready”; here is a conflict of desires in which desire of present ease and comfort may overcome desire of future pleasure. We may, indeed, assert that one cannot honestly say, “I know it would be a great pleasure to me, but I have no desire for it.” When such a phrase is used, it can only mean that the pleasure is interpreted as belonging to the generic140 class of pleasures, yet not a pleasure to the individual in his present conception, or else its contingency141, implied by “would,” is so great that desire is practically nil142.
And if the pleasurable is always the desirable, the desirable also may be said to be only the pleasurable. The martyr143 in his most eager desire for a painful death, fixes his mind, not upon the pain as pain, but upon the enduring it successfully, and the triumphant144 pleasure, also the satisfaction of the reward of martyrdom, and the pleasure of suffering for right and the approval of conscience; these and many other factors influence him.
Desire is at pleasure, not in pleasure, and thus contains 211pain, especially as implied in the preparative factors, sense of unreality and sense of lack. A bonbon may be so cunningly imitated, that placed in the mouth it feels like a bonbon, yet not tasting so, the painful sense of unreality and loss occurs. There is a painful waking up to the fact of non-realization, much the same in quality as that which we suppose to have happened in the original genesis of desire. The pleasant hallucination is broken in upon by actuality not fulfilling the psychic co-ordination pre-established under more favourable145 circumstances; and this occurs in early psychisms on a wider variety of occasions than in later development. That I am not tasting the bonbon I see on the table, this fact per se does not pain me. I take it as a matter of course in an order of nature already well learned and completely acquiesced146 in. But with infantile and lower stages of evolution generally, the lack of immediate correlation147 seems highly painful. Seeing has directly developed in immediate connection with a tasting, and the seeing without tasting seems by its very nature as disquieting148 as the feeling in the mouth the artificial bonbon without being able to taste is for later experience. It is through the negations of customary coincident impressions that anticipation149 and desire become forced by the exigencies150 of life. The early psychism is limited in its adjustments to a very few simple coincidences, but in the struggle of life in complex nature there comes disruption of these primitive co-ordinations, and sequences become apprehended151, and meaning is discerned in things. This disruption primitively occurred most easily when there was direct opposition153 to the usual course of sensations. Just as when mouthing the imitation bonbon, we apprehend152 most quickly and easily non-realization when it tastes sour rather than sweet. By realities continually breaking in upon the common course of psychic association, the significance of things is gradually apprehended, and to see a thing is understood 212not merely as coincident with other sensations and perceptions, touching, tasting, and pleasure-feeling, but the thing is cognized as centre of pleasure potency, and so can become object of desire. Experience loses its self-contained simplicity154, and is forced in the struggle of experience in a complex environment into some definite understanding of things, and into a feeling for them or at them, and not merely a feeling from them. And so a world of desirables and aversibles is formed.
If no pain was felt in the experience of unreality and lack, if there was mere passivity, desire would not be generated. This pain of loss spurs the mind to achieve desire, and desire enables the organism to attain the advantageous. At length a conventionalized world of desirables so formed, and certain significances, become so inground into experience that they seem often to be instinctively156 and immediately recognised by the individual, anterior157 to any personal learning by experience, as in cases of instinctive fear of, and desire for, certain objects.
While desire is attained at the incitement158 of pain, it is in itself a painful mental act. The emotional going out toward the desideratum is in itself a painful mode of consciousness. The feeling I have for the bonbon which I see and desire is, so far as desire, painful, yet negatively and comparatively, it may be pleasurable in that this psychosis may supplant160 one more painful still. It may be said that desire is painful, and also lack of desire, or ennui. But mere desirelessness is not ennui. Ennui is a feeling of lack and loss, and so a feeling of desire, but a peculiar kind of desire. It is desire for activity, when by a morbid161 status there is no desire moving to activity. Lack of desire and interest in things may be painfully revealed to some active natures, but to the great majority of psychisms it is a pleasure state. As far as we can judge, the undesire of the cow leisurely162 chewing her cud in a warm corner of the barn yard is supreme felicity. A 213state of desirelessness, complete yet blissful, occasionally visits even the consciousness of the nineteenth century busy-body. But the normality of desire for human adult consciousness in general is apparent to all. One who loses all interest or desire loses hold on life. Thus desire is life, and even when it is sought to extinguish it either as dictated163 by a philosophical164 maxim165 or by religious and moral scruples166, on account of the innate167 selfishness of desire—Madame Guyon, for instance—yet desire is sure to intrude168, and must as a desire to destroy desire. So whether we would fly, or would reach desire, we thereby desire. We may uproot169 or cultivate certain kinds of desire which thereby become objects of aversion or desire, but the effort to extinguish desire as general fact of psychic life involves either a psychological indefinite regressus which is never desireless, or else it means the extinction170 of consciousness itself in any grade above the lowest.
A further element which appears in all desire is some measure of self-consciousness. The representation of the experienceable implies some representation of experiences. In constituting the world as the sum total of the experienceable, we imply an ego-consciousness, and that objectifying as psychic act is correlated with subjectifying. Desire, like all other emotion, implies a subjective reference. We see clearly that the psychic act expressed by “this is the food,” and as such the precursor171 of and ingredient of desire, means an identification with past personal experience. A similar act is performed, no doubt, by animals very commonly, though not expressible in speech, yet in measure expressible, as in the cluckings of a hen to attract the brood to some seeds. In various ways the desideratum is suggested to the mind, and in view of it, both in the identifying as having experiences, and the longing to experience, some consciousness of personality is implied. This in early forms of 214psychosis is, no doubt, meagre and indefinite enough, but not more so than its correlate sense of object. When a strange object is presented, as when a famished traveller finds a new house, identifying effort is instinctive; he at once seeks to understand it, and gropes through his past experience to determine what has been its life significance for him or other persons, and so what will be. What is thus done in the full light of reflective consciousness by man, is done in a summary and imperfect manner, generally by psychisms, as preparative to making the object a desideratum or anti-desideratum. The assimilating and integrating, the knowing, never exists without some appreciation of subject, because integration is not only of something—objectifying act—but also to something—subjectifying act. Things are from the first apprehended only in their immediate egoistic significance, and also very early as centres of possible sensations which become a matter of fear and hope, desire and aversion.
Desire is certainly a very extensive psychic genus including many varieties which are noted172 by common introspection, and which are even denoted by special words. A wish is a momentary173 act of desire, longing is intense form; ambition and aspiration174 are desires for higher order of objects, as contrasted with desire for food or dress. The kinds as distinguished by object are numberless since any object may be desirable, and the realm of the desirable is coincident with the realm of the knowable. In the course of evolution we become aware of things and of states of consciousness, so that by feeling about them—having emotions—there may result the advantageous action with reference to them. This order, not consciously apprehended of course, is the natural order of psychic events, and one which, in tendency at least, always appears, even in latest evolutions. The desire to know what is the full experience value of things, curiosity, 215is an early acquirement, since complete cognition of object is obviously of the greatest advantage, especially to the weaker animals, as deer, who act wholly on the defensive175. The very strong can afford to be largely indifferent to their environment.
With reference to intensity, we can place forms from a positive to a negative pole. Thus with a famished man desire for food is first intense craving, becoming with continued eating moderate desire, then feeling of satisfaction, then of repletion176, then negative, as aversion in passive form or satiety177, then becoming active as disgust, and intense as loathing178. Content, or desire satisfied, is not desire extinguished, rather it is an equilibrium179 wherein desire and its function are in continual equalizing action. When desire granted means all desire extinguished, with beings of any high tendency to activity ennui is the result. Here, as Schopenhauer notes, wish for a wish develops. Even in complete pleasurable quiescence180, there is desire for its continuance, which is only saying that there can be no complete quiescence short of coma181, or else of a state where reality has never broken in, and experience is wholly unformed where the being cannot anticipate or note change. Pure and absolute content never occurs, and as a matter of fact never will, the point of transition in the desire gamut182, in passing from positive to negative, being like a mathematical form, unreal and theoretical. When positive desire ends, negative desire springs up immediately, just as in the pleasure-pain gamut, where the indifference point of transition has no existence in reality.
Desire in any of its forms may take on an altruistic183, disinterested phase, though much that is taken for altruistic is only apparently184 or partially185 so, being really due to self-extension. If you take an interest in anything, it becomes interesting to you, it is a matter of personal concern, and becomes identified with the self. Thus in 216our family, our town, our nation, our race, desire plants itself; it is in this personal extension of view that most of the pity, sympathy, and benevolence186 is exercised. A well-wishing and consequent exertion187 for humanity in general is very late, and still later is desire for animals as sentient188 beings having a worth of being in themselves.
The remarks we have made concerning desire proper, apply equally to aversion. We must bear constantly in mind that desire proper and aversion are really in psychic analysis, merely phases positive and negative of a certain definite mode of psychosis, hence we often use desire in this large and generic sense, which instances will be apparent from the context. Desire, like other emotions, is polar, and desire generic has its antipodal feeling in some form of active desirelessness.
As desire is naturally and originally connected with all perception of object, we find it closely allied189 with other emotions. While we must suppose that early desire is upon idea of pleasure, upon the idea of its realization to be attained, without any estimate of likelihood or unlikelihood of realization, which factor is slow in evolution, yet when through experience, sense of certainty or uncertainty190 is attained as to the experienceable, this psychosis—belief—has a marked effect upon desire, and is closely associated with it. Bare sense of the experienceable was sufficient to generate desire, but when the measure of probability of the experienceable actually happening is measured, we have belief, expectation, hope, and kindred psychoses, bound up with desire. The expression, “I hope it will be a good day to-morrow,” indicates a wish that it would, plus some confidence that it will be a good day; “I wish it would be a good day, but I fear it will not,” shows some lack of confidence in the realization of the event. Hope then equals wish, plus the intellectual element expectation, a desire for a realization plus some belief in it as actually to happen. A large 217share of learning by experience consists in the reaction of this expectation on the wish, in learning not to set our hearts on what we believe to be unrealizable or extremely improbable to happen. Wish also acts on belief, as is plainly expressed in the common phrase, “the wish is father to the thought.” If belief tends to restrict or magnify desire, desire also tends to determine belief. Hope, as very commonly used, as when we say, “I hope it will turn out so,” is a passive emotion, and does not appeal to the individual as self-determining the event. As the primary end of emotion is to incite159 the organism to determine its own experience, hope as passive seems a rather late evolution, as having only an indirect and general value by maintaining general pleasurable tone. The one who hopes it will be a good day to-morrow is in a better and more advantageous frame of mind than he who fears it will be a bad day, in so far as the events are equally beyond self-determination, and it is of no direct use to either hope or fear.
As to the range of desire we must then disagree with Aristotle and later psychologists, who suppose that desire is limited by the belief in the possibility of realization. Desire existed before this belief was generated; and while, after its generation, it may often affect desire, yet often it does not. I may wish for the moon as readily as the child to whom the notion of possibility or impossibility of realization is beyond experience. The unrepresentable only cannot be wished, and desire is bounded only by the power of conception and perception. Hope is a species of desire which has to do with belief in the possibility of the event or act: it is a joyful191 emotion connected with belief of realization of the pleasurable. This distinction between hope and desire in general is implied in the phrases, “I wish he would do it,” and “I hope he will.” The hope includes the desire, but the desire may exist without the hope, as we say, “I wish he would, but 218know he won’t.” Desire may be hopeless, but hope cannot be desireless.
Desire is vitally connected with ideation and volition, but properly it is the intermediate emotional moment between these, and not idea of pleasure—as James Mill—nor yet to be placed under will—Bain, James. It is neither phase of ideation or volition. Desire is neither idea of, nor striving after realization; it is not the idea of goal nor the effort to reach goal. I may have idea of a goal without desire to reach it—at least, analysis discriminates192 thus as separate mental stages—and I may desire to reach it without trying to reach it,—impotent desire, sometimes called wish. The striving is the consequent, and the idea the antecedent of the desire which is the emotion wave we emphasize by the word, longing. Desire is neither phase of volition nor ideation. Volition is properly effort at realization, and is stimulated by the emotion toward the realization ideally apprehended.
The relation of desire to will has been a fertile subject of discussion from Aristotle down, but we have to take up but a single aspect, namely, whether will and desire may with reference to the same object be contrary or distinct. Take the example of contrariety mentioned by Stewart. I wish a certain man not to do a certain act, but yet I persuade him to do it at the request of a friend. If I say I will persuade him, though I wish him not to be persuaded, this merely implies that the wish to oblige my friend overcomes the aversion to persuading the man. And, in general, apparent cases of conflict of will and desire may be resolved into conflict of desires. Hence the phrase, “I will do it, though I do not want to do it,” is inaccurate193 or rather an incomplete analysis. We should always add, “because I have some extraneous194 and stronger desire.” A box of bonbons is hung in a room at a height to be had by whomsoever will jump and reach it. In any party of persons there may be some to whom the wish for 219ease, the disinclination to jump, overcomes the inclination195 for the bonbons, so that this volition does not occur, others who jump even against this disinclination, the desire for the bonbons being the stronger desire, and others, very active, who jump without feeling any disinclination to the act. Conflict of desires is a common and almost constant state with many minds, and the evolution of man has been mainly through conflict of desire in sacrificing an immediate to a future good. In lower minds with so little self-consciousness and consciousness of a consciousness that they do not grasp conduct as a whole, there is a simple alternation of volitions flowing from the desires of rival goods, till one by its intrinsic force dominates with some permanence. These are the creatures of impulse, unreflecting and unself-directing by principle and reason. Higher minds realize their situation and consciously bring in higher desire or motive196; they form rules and principles of conduct: they become ethical beings, having self-control and self-direction.
Desire is based by Mr. Bain on hindrance197 and opposition to activity, on “a bar in the way of activity.” This is true if we understand it to refer to sense of unreality and of lack as connected with an apprehension198 of thing where the thing is really absent from the usual correlation, and hence physiological activities are checked. We have in the previous pages discussed this, but this is not Mr. Bain’s point of view. The three elements he emphasizes are: deficiency, idea of pleasure, and the hindrance. Thus, he contrasts the prisoner who looks out on a bright day and longs to take a walk, with a perfectly199 free man who looks out on a fine day and freely follows his inclination to walk. However, it appears to me that both have desire, and that in the same sense both are moved by the motive, though only one is free to attain the action. So if I get thirsty in a waterless desert or in my room with a jug200 of water on the table, the bodily sensations will equally lead 220to desire. The conflict in desire is between state actual and state conceived, and not between will and restraint. Mr. Bain remarks, “If all motive impulses could be at once followed up, desire would have no place.” (Emotions and Will, p. 423.) But desire is itself an original impulse, and is more or less an ingredient in all emotion impulse; and it is plain that emotion impulses as implying representation are the only ones which can be “followed up.” Where every wish is gratified as soon as formed, as with a petted child of rich parents, desire still remains201 in all its characteristic quality. Such an one, however, by having only the momentary pleasure of completed realization, misses the joys of realizing, and loses all that happiness which has been defined as sense of progress. If every wish were gratified as soon as formed, if every representation of pleasure was immediately followed by realization, desire would still exist in all its peculiar force. The moment of gratification is always second to the moment of desire, and a Fortunatus with his wishing-cap cannot possess in absolute coincidence with the wish.
It may be objected that Tantalus’ desire is certainly a form where hindrance is the main stimulant202. When one is continually hindered just on the point of realization, desire is intensified203, but this intensifying204 is very largely due to the increased definiteness of presentation or representation, and to the increase of confidence in the event. To tantalize205 is to bring before one an object of strong desire into the clearest prominence206 and seemingly certain attainment, yet to constantly withhold207 it.
We have spoken of desire as an impulse, and we would include all emotion as impulse, for to impel111 is its function and action. Impulse is the will side of emotion as interest is its intellectual side. If I fear a man, this is my interest in him and impulse from him. True, we speak of being driven by “blind impulse”; but emotion cannot be blind, it can only be kindled208 by object imaged. Anything 221which actuates the will may very broadly but wrongly be called impulse, for impulse strictly209 connotes an emotion wave undirected and issuing at once in action. Where unforeseen ends are served, as when a hen driven by sensation of heat sits on eggs, we commonly but wrongly denominate it impulse. Without some representation there is no emotion and no impulse. So when standing155 over a precipice210 I say I have the impulse to throw myself down, this means that the depth wakens in me image of falling and an awful desire to realize the image, which impels211 the act. If I am merely giddy I will fall, but if I have the emotion-impulse I will throw myself down; I am not impelled by dizziness or any sensation, but the term denotes emotion as desire or fear.
For the ordinary human mind desire seems in general a spontaneous and instinctive act. We do not make an effort in desiring, though desire like other mental functions undoubtedly212 arose in struggle. Originally this psychosis was a stress and strain activity; it was a rarely achieved emotion, just as the emotion of pleasurable appreciation of Beethoven’s music or Michael Angelo’s sculpture is for most minds a rare uplift of psychic force. Knowing as compound of presentation and representation and as involving emotion and volition, is, with us, within certain limits, an habitual spontaneous act of mind. I feel the pain from cold, without sensation of cold, as bare pain, as undifferentiated feeling of discomfort, I then feel cold, I feel cold object, I desire warmth, I will to draw near the stove; here is a progressive series of correlated psychoses which are constantly occurring in a spontaneous way in ordinary experience. But this psychic structure which operates so easily is really the outgrowth of ages of psychic evolution wherein the separate steps have been achieved and the correlation established only by the severest nisus.
Associations are first achieved in experience established 222by numberless reiterations before there is spontaneous tendency to re-occurrence, this is the law of psychic evolution to-day, and is the only clue we have to the past. The evolution of mind is not and never has been a mechanical process, but its basis is in pure feeling as stimulating volition. Paradoxical as the expression sounds, yet in a sense it is true that the organism has learned to know and to feel thereupon. It may even be that in the course of psychic ages with certain species of animals some emotions may become innate, and such advantageous psychoses as fear or desire may occur without any integration through individual experience. The new-born chick, when it hears the note of a hawk213, is said to show signs of fear, though what actual psychosis occurs, if any, seems almost beyond our power to know. The whole process may be reflex nervous action, a mere closed neural214 circuit being affected215. It is no doubt true that all long-continued, often recurring216 psychoses tend to so embody217 themselves in a neural combination that the given activities are carried on in a sub-conscious and finally in an unconscious way. It is very probable that much that we take for emotion with lower animals is reflex or semi-reflex action; yet it is likewise true that there is, as a matter of advantage in struggle for existence, an inherited instinctive tendency to certain emotions, to certain kinds of fear and desire, and there may be a distinct awareness218 of the potency in things, which has never been individually realized. In its every transaction with things the young organism may act by reflex action or by inherited emotional tendency. How far either or both enter into the first individual experiences is a matter for the psychology of the future.
The general function of desire in life is obvious; it is the most potent factor in conserving219 and extending life. Far back in a paleozoic psychic period life was below desire; but once originating under the pressure of the 223struggle for existence it has since developed into the most manifold and complex forms. Human life is the outcome of desire, and the human being is par17 excellence220 the desiring psychism. As the moving factor of humanity history is its record, and present human organization, faculty221, and achievement is its product. Desire, as the force to realize, to convert seen potency into actuality, the idea into reality, is now in the very highest examples of psychic development an ever increasing power, and no prospect77 of a psychic stage to be reached beyond desire is intimated in the present course of normal development. The tendency toward extinction of desire, when it does occur, appears always as pathologic or retrogressive symptom. It may be the dream of a philosopher or of a cult91, but with Schopenhauer himself desire was a most forceful factor, and the devotee of desirelessness by very reason of being a devotee to an object, desires it, namely, the state of desirelessness. We may desire to extinguish certain desires, and succeed in accomplishing this, but to desire not to desire, as general act, is a psychological contradiction in terms. A very low vegetative psychic status without any desire is possible, but all teleologic48 activity implies desire, hence extinction of desire can never be attained as an end.
Desire moves the world and is the core of psychic being. Deprived of definite desire, we long for it, and if every wish were immediately realized, we should desire delay in gratification. The amount and value of life is measured by the quantity, quality, and effectiveness of desire. Orton characterizes the Indians of the Amazon as “without curiosity or emotion,” which must, however, be taken only as relatively222 true, but yet marking them as extremely low in the psychic scale.
Education then, is a process of stimulating desire, of leading to ambitions and aspirations223. As what is imposed on consciousness without desire is a hurtful burden, the 224true pedagogic method is always to awaken25 the wish for knowledge and power before it is granted. Desire as interest is assimilating power, and without it there is no mental growth. The art of education is the art of stimulating intellectual, ?sthetic, moral and religious desires, and of providing for their progressive gratification with the best arranged and most suggestive material.
![](../../../skin/default/image/4.jpg)
点击
收听单词发音
![收听单词发音](/template/default/tingnovel/images/play.gif)
1
psychic
![]() |
|
n.对超自然力敏感的人;adj.有超自然力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
marine
![]() |
|
adj.海的;海生的;航海的;海事的;n.水兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
incessant
![]() |
|
adj.不停的,连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
incessantly
![]() |
|
ad.不停地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
subjective
![]() |
|
a.主观(上)的,个人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
prop
![]() |
|
vt.支撑;n.支柱,支撑物;支持者,靠山 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
realization
![]() |
|
n.实现;认识到,深刻了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
discriminated
![]() |
|
分别,辨别,区分( discriminate的过去式和过去分词 ); 歧视,有差别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
edible
![]() |
|
n.食品,食物;adj.可食用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
psychical
![]() |
|
adj.有关特异功能现象的;有关特异功能官能的;灵魂的;心灵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
promptly
![]() |
|
adv.及时地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
precedent
![]() |
|
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
emphatic
![]() |
|
adj.强调的,着重的;无可置疑的,明显的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
potent
![]() |
|
adj.强有力的,有权势的;有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
formerly
![]() |
|
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
par
![]() |
|
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
touching
![]() |
|
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
appropriation
![]() |
|
n.拨款,批准支出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
edibility
![]() |
|
适食性,可食性; 可食用性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
economized
![]() |
|
v.节省,减少开支( economize的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
incentive
![]() |
|
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
entirely
![]() |
|
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
awakened
![]() |
|
v.(使)醒( awaken的过去式和过去分词 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
awaken
![]() |
|
vi.醒,觉醒;vt.唤醒,使觉醒,唤起,激起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
advantageous
![]() |
|
adj.有利的;有帮助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
arena
![]() |
|
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
dominant
![]() |
|
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
incipient
![]() |
|
adj.起初的,发端的,初期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
evolutionary
![]() |
|
adj.进化的;演化的,演变的;[生]进化论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
psychology
![]() |
|
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
awakens
![]() |
|
v.(使)醒( awaken的第三人称单数 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
testimony
![]() |
|
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
esteem
![]() |
|
n.尊敬,尊重;vt.尊重,敬重;把…看作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
pebbles
![]() |
|
[复数]鹅卵石; 沙砾; 卵石,小圆石( pebble的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
pony
![]() |
|
adj.小型的;n.小马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
irrelevant
![]() |
|
adj.不恰当的,无关系的,不相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
instinctive
![]() |
|
adj.(出于)本能的;直觉的;(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
hereditary
![]() |
|
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
integration
![]() |
|
n.一体化,联合,结合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
accomplished
![]() |
|
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
merges
![]() |
|
(使)混合( merge的第三人称单数 ); 相融; 融入; 渐渐消失在某物中 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
disinterested
![]() |
|
adj.不关心的,不感兴趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
attain
![]() |
|
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
attainment
![]() |
|
n.达到,到达;[常pl.]成就,造诣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
distinguished
![]() |
|
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
teleological
![]() |
|
adj.目的论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
teleologic
![]() |
|
adj.目的论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
tempts
![]() |
|
v.引诱或怂恿(某人)干不正当的事( tempt的第三人称单数 );使想要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
woe
![]() |
|
n.悲哀,苦痛,不幸,困难;int.用来表达悲伤或惊慌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
psychism
![]() |
|
心灵论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
ward
![]() |
|
n.守卫,监护,病房,行政区,由监护人或法院保护的人(尤指儿童);vt.守护,躲开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
akin
![]() |
|
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
abode
![]() |
|
n.住处,住所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
solely
![]() |
|
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
noxious
![]() |
|
adj.有害的,有毒的;使道德败坏的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57
nauseating
![]() |
|
adj.令人恶心的,使人厌恶的v.使恶心,作呕( nauseate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58
positively
![]() |
|
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59
ethics
![]() |
|
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60
longing
![]() |
|
n.(for)渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61
volition
![]() |
|
n.意志;决意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62
ennui
![]() |
|
n.怠倦,无聊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63
victorious
![]() |
|
adj.胜利的,得胜的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64
stimulated
![]() |
|
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65
stimulate
![]() |
|
vt.刺激,使兴奋;激励,使…振奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66
intensity
![]() |
|
n.强烈,剧烈;强度;烈度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67
enjoyment
![]() |
|
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69
thereby
![]() |
|
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70
penetrates
![]() |
|
v.穿过( penetrate的第三人称单数 );刺入;了解;渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71
sufficiently
![]() |
|
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72
defective
![]() |
|
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73
habitual
![]() |
|
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74
champagne
![]() |
|
n.香槟酒;微黄色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75
ecstasy
![]() |
|
n.狂喜,心醉神怡,入迷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76
prospective
![]() |
|
adj.预期的,未来的,前瞻性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77
prospect
![]() |
|
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78
purely
![]() |
|
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79
inevitable
![]() |
|
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80
ethical
![]() |
|
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81
tinge
![]() |
|
vt.(较淡)着色于,染色;使带有…气息;n.淡淡色彩,些微的气息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82
denotation
![]() |
|
n.(明示的)意义;指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83
stimulating
![]() |
|
adj.有启发性的,能激发人思考的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84
acting
![]() |
|
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85
dint
![]() |
|
n.由于,靠;凹坑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86
primitive
![]() |
|
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87
restriction
![]() |
|
n.限制,约束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88
craving
![]() |
|
n.渴望,热望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89
gnawing
![]() |
|
a.痛苦的,折磨人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90
immediate
![]() |
|
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91
cult
![]() |
|
n.异教,邪教;时尚,狂热的崇拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92
psychically
![]() |
|
adv.精神上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94
disturbance
![]() |
|
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95
stimulus
![]() |
|
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96
cognitive
![]() |
|
adj.认知的,认识的,有感知的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97
dozing
![]() |
|
v.打瞌睡,假寐 n.瞌睡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98
allaying
![]() |
|
v.减轻,缓和( allay的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99
renewal
![]() |
|
adj.(契约)延期,续订,更新,复活,重来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100
doze
![]() |
|
v.打瞌睡;n.打盹,假寐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101
intensifies
![]() |
|
n.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的名词复数 )v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102
specialized
![]() |
|
adj.专门的,专业化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103
initiate
![]() |
|
vt.开始,创始,发动;启蒙,使入门;引入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104
distressful
![]() |
|
adj.苦难重重的,不幸的,使苦恼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105
liking
![]() |
|
n.爱好;嗜好;喜欢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106
attained
![]() |
|
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107
virtue
![]() |
|
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108
crave
![]() |
|
vt.渴望得到,迫切需要,恳求,请求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109
intermittence
![]() |
|
n.间断;间歇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110
impelled
![]() |
|
v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111
impel
![]() |
|
v.推动;激励,迫使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112
mighty
![]() |
|
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113
primitively
![]() |
|
最初地,自学而成地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114
appreciation
![]() |
|
n.评价;欣赏;感谢;领会,理解;价格上涨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115
thoroughly
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116
savage
![]() |
|
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117
bonbon
![]() |
|
n.棒棒糖;夹心糖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118
bonbons
![]() |
|
n.小糖果( bonbon的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119
indifference
![]() |
|
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120
actively
![]() |
|
adv.积极地,勤奋地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121
revival
![]() |
|
n.复兴,复苏,(精力、活力等的)重振 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122
isolated
![]() |
|
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123
wrought
![]() |
|
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124
physiological
![]() |
|
adj.生理学的,生理学上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125
specially
![]() |
|
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126
potency
![]() |
|
n. 效力,潜能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127
induction
![]() |
|
n.感应,感应现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128
discomfort
![]() |
|
n.不舒服,不安,难过,困难,不方便 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129
plunged
![]() |
|
v.颠簸( plunge的过去式和过去分词 );暴跌;骤降;突降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130
variance
![]() |
|
n.矛盾,不同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131
complexity
![]() |
|
n.复杂(性),复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132
supreme
![]() |
|
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133
scenting
![]() |
|
vt.闻到(scent的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134
scent
![]() |
|
n.气味,香味,香水,线索,嗅觉;v.嗅,发觉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135
yearning
![]() |
|
a.渴望的;向往的;怀念的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136
physiologically
![]() |
|
ad.生理上,在生理学上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137
relish
![]() |
|
n.滋味,享受,爱好,调味品;vt.加调味料,享受,品味;vi.有滋味 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138
famished
![]() |
|
adj.饥饿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139
dread
![]() |
|
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140
generic
![]() |
|
adj.一般的,普通的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141
contingency
![]() |
|
n.意外事件,可能性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142
nil
![]() |
|
n.无,全无,零 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143
martyr
![]() |
|
n.烈士,殉难者;vt.杀害,折磨,牺牲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144
triumphant
![]() |
|
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145
favourable
![]() |
|
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146
acquiesced
![]() |
|
v.默认,默许( acquiesce的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147
correlation
![]() |
|
n.相互关系,相关,关连 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148
disquieting
![]() |
|
adj.令人不安的,令人不平静的v.使不安,使忧虑,使烦恼( disquiet的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149
anticipation
![]() |
|
n.预期,预料,期望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150
exigencies
![]() |
|
n.急切需要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151
apprehended
![]() |
|
逮捕,拘押( apprehend的过去式和过去分词 ); 理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152
apprehend
![]() |
|
vt.理解,领悟,逮捕,拘捕,忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153
opposition
![]() |
|
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154
simplicity
![]() |
|
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155
standing
![]() |
|
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156
instinctively
![]() |
|
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157
anterior
![]() |
|
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158
incitement
![]() |
|
激励; 刺激; 煽动; 激励物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159
incite
![]() |
|
v.引起,激动,煽动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160
supplant
![]() |
|
vt.排挤;取代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161
morbid
![]() |
|
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162
leisurely
![]() |
|
adj.悠闲的;从容的,慢慢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163
dictated
![]() |
|
v.大声讲或读( dictate的过去式和过去分词 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164
philosophical
![]() |
|
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165
maxim
![]() |
|
n.格言,箴言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166
scruples
![]() |
|
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167
innate
![]() |
|
adj.天生的,固有的,天赋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168
intrude
![]() |
|
vi.闯入;侵入;打扰,侵扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169
uproot
![]() |
|
v.连根拔起,拔除;根除,灭绝;赶出家园,被迫移开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170
extinction
![]() |
|
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171
precursor
![]() |
|
n.先驱者;前辈;前任;预兆;先兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172
noted
![]() |
|
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173
momentary
![]() |
|
adj.片刻的,瞬息的;短暂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174
aspiration
![]() |
|
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175
defensive
![]() |
|
adj.防御的;防卫的;防守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176
repletion
![]() |
|
n.充满,吃饱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177
satiety
![]() |
|
n.饱和;(市场的)充分供应 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178
loathing
![]() |
|
n.厌恶,憎恨v.憎恨,厌恶( loathe的现在分词);极不喜欢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179
equilibrium
![]() |
|
n.平衡,均衡,相称,均势,平静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180
quiescence
![]() |
|
n.静止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181
coma
![]() |
|
n.昏迷,昏迷状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182
gamut
![]() |
|
n.全音阶,(一领域的)全部知识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183
altruistic
![]() |
|
adj.无私的,为他人着想的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184
apparently
![]() |
|
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185
partially
![]() |
|
adv.部分地,从某些方面讲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186
benevolence
![]() |
|
n.慈悲,捐助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187
exertion
![]() |
|
n.尽力,努力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188
sentient
![]() |
|
adj.有知觉的,知悉的;adv.有感觉能力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189
allied
![]() |
|
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190
uncertainty
![]() |
|
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191
joyful
![]() |
|
adj.欢乐的,令人欢欣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192
discriminates
![]() |
|
分别,辨别,区分( discriminate的第三人称单数 ); 歧视,有差别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193
inaccurate
![]() |
|
adj.错误的,不正确的,不准确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194
extraneous
![]() |
|
adj.体外的;外来的;外部的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195
inclination
![]() |
|
n.倾斜;点头;弯腰;斜坡;倾度;倾向;爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196
motive
![]() |
|
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197
hindrance
![]() |
|
n.妨碍,障碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198
apprehension
![]() |
|
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199
perfectly
![]() |
|
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200
jug
![]() |
|
n.(有柄,小口,可盛水等的)大壶,罐,盂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201
remains
![]() |
|
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202
stimulant
![]() |
|
n.刺激物,兴奋剂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203
intensified
![]() |
|
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204
intensifying
![]() |
|
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的现在分词 );增辉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205
tantalize
![]() |
|
vt.使干着急,逗弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206
prominence
![]() |
|
n.突出;显著;杰出;重要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207
withhold
![]() |
|
v.拒绝,不给;使停止,阻挡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208
kindled
![]() |
|
(使某物)燃烧,着火( kindle的过去式和过去分词 ); 激起(感情等); 发亮,放光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209
strictly
![]() |
|
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210
precipice
![]() |
|
n.悬崖,危急的处境 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211
impels
![]() |
|
v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212
undoubtedly
![]() |
|
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213
hawk
![]() |
|
n.鹰,骗子;鹰派成员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214
neural
![]() |
|
adj.神经的,神经系统的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215
affected
![]() |
|
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216
recurring
![]() |
|
adj.往复的,再次发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217
embody
![]() |
|
vt.具体表达,使具体化;包含,收录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218
awareness
![]() |
|
n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219
conserving
![]() |
|
v.保护,保藏,保存( conserve的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220
excellence
![]() |
|
n.优秀,杰出,(pl.)优点,美德 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221
faculty
![]() |
|
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222
relatively
![]() |
|
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223
aspirations
![]() |
|
强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 ); 志向; 发送气音; 发 h 音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |