Bearing this in mind I refused to be scared in advance by the notorious reputation of Frank Wedekind, whose chief claim to recognition in New York is his Spring's Awakening6, produced at the Irving Place Theatre seasons ago. I had seen this moving drama of youth more than once in the Kammerspielhaus of the Deutsches Theatre, Berlin, and earlier the same poet's drama Erdgeist (in the summer, 1903), and again refused to shudder7 at its melodramatic atrocities8. Wedekind wore at that time the mask Mephistophelian, and his admirers, for he had many from the beginning, delighted in what they called his spiritual depravity—forgetting that [Pg 122] the two qualities cannot be blended. Now, while I have termed Frank Wedekind the naughty boy of the modern German drama, I by no means place him among those spirits like Goethe's Mephisto, who perpetually deny. On the contrary, he is one of the most affirmative voices in the new German literature.
He is always asserting. If he bowls away at some rickety ninepin of a social lie, he does it with a gusto that is exhilarating. To be sure, whatever the government is, he is against it; which only means he is a rebel born, hating constraint10 and believing with Stendhal that one's first enemies are one's own parents. No doubt, after bitter experience, Wedekind discovered that his bitterest foe11 was himself. That he is a tricky12, Puck-like nature is evident. He loves to shock, a trait common to all romanticists from Gautier down. He sometimes says things he doesn't mean. He contradicts himself as do most men of genius, and, despite his poetic13 temperament14, there is in him much of the lay preacher. I have noticed this quality in men such as Ibsen and Strindberg, who cry aloud in the wilderness15 of Philistia for freedom, for the "free, unhampered life" and then devise a new system that is thrice as irksome as the old, that puts one's soul into a spiritual bondage17. Wedekind is of this order; a moralist is concealed18 behind his shining ambuscade of verbal immoralism. In Germany every one sports his Weltanschauung, his personal interpretation19 of [Pg 123] life and its meanings. In a word, a working philosophy—and a fearsome thing it is to see young students with fresh sabre cuts on their honest countenances20 demolishing21 Kant, Schopenhauer, or Nietzsche only to set up some other system.
Always a system, always this compartmentising of the facts of existence. Scratch the sentimentalism and ?stheticism of a German, and you come upon a pedant22. Wedekind has not altogether escaped this national peculiarity23. But he writes for to-morrow, not yesterday; for youth, and not to destroy the cherished prejudices of the old. His admirers speak of him as a unicum, a man so original as to be without forerunners24, without followers25. A monster? For no one can escape the common law of descent, whether physical or spiritual. Wedekind has had plenty of teachers, not excepting the most valuable of all, personal experience. The sinister26 shadow cast by Ibsen fell across the shoulders of the young poet, and he has read Max Stirner and Nietzsche not wisely, but too well. He is as frank as Walt Whitman (and as shameless) concerning the mysteries of life, and as healthy (and as coarse) as Rabelais. Furthermore, Strindberg played a marked r?le in his artistic27 development. Without the hopeless misogyny of the Swede, without his pessimism28, Wedekind is quite as drastic. And the realism of the Antoine Theatre should not be omitted.
[Pg 124] He exhibits in his menagerie of types—many of them new in the theatre—a striking collection of wild animals. In the prologue29 to one of his plays he tells his audience that to Wedekind must they come if they wish to see genuine wild and beautiful beasts. This sounds like Stirner. He lays much stress on the fact that literature, whether poetic or otherwise, has become too "literary"—hardly a novel idea; and boasts that none of his characters has read a book. The curse of modern life is the multiplication30 of books. Very true, and yet I find that Wedekind is "literary," that he could exclaim with Stephan Mallarmé: "La chair est triste, hélas! et j'ai lu tous les livres."
Regarding the modern stage he is also positive. He believes that for the last twenty years dramatic literature is filled with half-humans, men who are not fit for fatherhood, women who would escape the burden of bearing children because of their superior culture. This is called "a problem play," the hero or heroine of which commits suicide at the end of the fifth act to the great delight of neurotic31, dissatisfied ladies and hysterical32 men. Weak wills—in either sex—have been the trump33 card of the latter-day dramatist; not a sound man or woman who isn't at the same time stupid, can be found in the plays of Ibsen or Hauptmann or the rest. Wedekind mentions no names, but he tweaks several noses prominent in dramatic literature.
He is the younger generation kicking in the [Pg 125] panels of the doors in the old houses. There is a hellish racket for a while, and then when the dust clears away you discern the revolutionist calmly ensconced in the seats of the bygone mighty34 and passionately35 preaching from the open window his version of New Life; he is become reformer himself and would save a perishing race—spiritually speaking—from damnation by the gospel of beauty, by shattering the shackles36 of love—especially the latter; love to be love must be free, preaches Wedekind; love is still in the swaddling clothes of Oriental prejudice. George Meredith once said the same in Diana of the Crossways, although he said it more epigrammatically. For Wedekind religion is a symbol of our love of ourselves; nevertheless, outside of his two engrossing38 themes, love and death, he is chiefly concerned with religion, not alone as material for artistic treatment, but as a serious problem of our existence. A Lucifer in pride, he tells us that he has never made of good evil, or vice39 versa; he, unlike Baudelaire, has never deliberately40 said: Evil, be thou my good! That he has emptied upon the boards from his Pandora-box imagination the greatest gang of scoundrels, shady ladies, master swindlers, social degenerates41, circus people, servants, convicts, professional strong men, half-crazy idealists, irritable42 rainbow-eaters—the demi-monde of a subterranean43 world—that ever an astonished world saw perform their antics in front of the footlights is not to be denied, [Pg 126] but it must be confessed that his criminal supermen and superwomen usually get their deserts. Like Octave Mirbeau, he faces the music of facts, and there are none too abhorrent44 that he doesn't transform into something significant.
On the technical side Strindberg has taught him much; he prefers the one-act form, or a series of loosely joined episodes. Formally he is not a master, nor despite his versatility45 is he objective. With Strindberg he has been called "Shakespearian"—fatal word—but he is not; that in the vast domain46 of Shakespeare there is room for them both I do not doubt; room in the vicinity of the morbid47 swamps and dark forests, or hard by the house of them that are melancholy48 mad.
The oftener I see or read Wedekind the more I admire his fund of humour. But I feel the tug49 of his theories. The dramatist in him is hampered16 by the theorist who would "reform" all life—he is neither a socialist50 nor an upholder of female suffrage—and when some of his admiring critics talk of his "ideals of beauty and power," then I know the game is up—the prophet, the dogmatist, the pedant, not the poet, artist, and witty51 observer of life, are thrust in the foreground.
There is Hermann Sudermann, for example, the precise antipodes of Wedekind—Sudermann, the inexhaustible bottle of the German theatre, the conjurer who imperturbably52 pours out any flavour, colour, or liquid you desire from [Pg 127] his bottle; presto53, here is Ibsen, or Dumas, or Hauptmann, or Sardou; comedy, satire54, tragedy, farce55, or the marionettes of the fashionable world! Frank Wedekind is less of the stage prestidigitator and more sincere. We must, perforce, listen to his creatures as they parade their agony before us, and we admire his clever rogues56—the never-to-be-forgotten Marquis of Keith heads the list—and smile at their rough humour and wisdom. For me, the real Frank Wedekind is not the prophet, but the dramatist. As there is much of his stark57 personality in his plays, it would not be amiss to glance at his career.
He has "a long foreground," as Emerson said of Walt Whitman. He was born at Hanover, July 24, 1864, and consequently was only twenty-seven years old when, in 1891, he wrote his most original, if not most finished, drama, Spring's Awakening. He studied law four terms at Munich, two at Zurich: but for this lawless soul jurisprudence was not to be; it was to fulfil a wish of his father's that he consented to the drudgery58. A little poem which has been reproduced in leaflet form, Felix and Galathea, is practically his earliest offering to the muse59. Like most beginnings of fanatics60 and realists, it fairly swims and shimmers61 with idealism. His father dead, a roving existence and a precarious62 one began for the youthful Frank. He lived by his wits in Paris and London, learned two languages, met that underworld which later [Pg 128] was to figure in his vital dramatic pictures, wrote advertisements for a canned soup—in Hauptmann's early play, Friedensfest, Wedekind is said to figure as Robert, who is a réclame agent—was attached to circuses, variety theatres, and fairs, was an actor in tingletangles, cabarets, and saw life on its seamiest side, whether in Germany, Austria, France, or England. Such experiences produced their inevitable63 reaction—disillusionment. Finally in 1905 Director Reinhardt engaged him as an actor and he married the actress Tilly Niemann-Newes, with whom he has since lived happily, the father of a son, his troubled spirit in safe harbour at last, but not in the least changed, to judge from his play, Franziska, a Modern Mystery.
Personally, Wedekind was never an extravagant65, exaggerated man. A sorrowful face in repose66 is his, and when he appeared on Hans von Wolzogen's Ueberbrettl, or sang at the Munich cabaret called the Eleven Hangmen, his songs—he composes at times—Ilse, Goldstück, Brigitte B, Mein Liebchen, to the accompaniment of his guitar, there was a distinct individuality in his speech and gesture very attractive to the public.
But as an actor Wedekind is not distinguished67, though versatile68. I've only seen him in two r?les, as Karl Hetman in his play of Hidalla (now renamed after the leading r?le), and as Ernest Scholtz in The Marquis of Keith. [Pg 129] As Jack69 the Ripper in The Box of Pandora I am glad to say that I have not viewed him, though he is said to be a gruesome figure during the few minutes that he is in the scene. His mimetic methods recalled to me the simplicity70 of Antoine—who is not a great actor, yet, somehow or other, an impressive one. Naturally, Wedekind is the poet speaking his own lines, acting71 his own creations, and there is, for that reason, an intimate note in his interpretations72, an indescribable sympathy, and an underscoring of his meanings that even a much superior actor might miss. He is so absolutely unconventional in his bearing and speech as to seem amateurish73, yet he secures with his naturalism some poignant74 effects. I shan't soon forget his Karl Hetman, the visionary reformer.
Wedekind, like Heine, has the faculty75 of a cynical76, a consuming self-irony77. He is said to be admirable in Der Kammers?nger. It must not be forgotten that he has, because of a witty lampoon78 in the publication Simplicissimus, done his "little bit" as they say in penitentiary79 social circles. These few months in prison furnished him with scenic80 opportunities; there is more than one of his plays with a prison set. And how he does lay out the "system." He, like Baudelaire, Flaubert, and De Maupassant, was summoned before the bar of justice for outraging81 public morals by the publication of his play, The Box of Pandora, the sequel to Erdgeist. He had to withdraw the book and expunge82 certain offensive [Pg 130] passages, but he escaped fine and imprisonment83, as did his publisher, Bruno Cassirer. He rewrote the play, the second act of which had been originally printed in French, the third in English, and its republication was permitted by the sensitive authorities of Berlin.
If a critic can't become famous because of his wisdom he may nevertheless attain84 a sort of immortality85, or what we call that elusive86 thing, by writing himself down an ass9. The history of critical literature would reveal many such. Think of such an accomplished87 practitioner88 as the late M. Brunetière, writing as he did of Flaubert and Baudelaire. And that monument to critical ineptitude89, Degeneration, by Max Nordau. A more modern instance is the judgment90 of Julius Hart in the publication, Tag (1901), concerning our dramatist. He wrote: "In German literature to-day there is nothing as vile91 as the art of Frank Wedekind." Fearing this sparkling gem92 of criticism might escape the notice of posterity93, Wedekind printed it as a sort of motto to his beautiful poetic play (1902), Such Is Life. However, the truth is that our poet is often disconcerting. His swift transition from mood to mood disturbs the spectator, especially when one mood is lofty, the next shocking. He has also been called "the clown of the German stage," and not without reason, for his mental acrobatics94, his grand and lofty tumblings from sheer transcendentalism to the raw realism, his elliptical [Pg 131] style, are incomprehensible even to the best trained of audiences. As Alfred Kerr rightfully puts it, you must learn to see anew in the theatre of Wedekind. All of which is correct, yet we respectfully submit that the theatre, like a picture, has its optics: its foreground, middle distance, background, and foreshortening. Destroy the perspective and the stage is transformed into something that resembles staring post-Impressionist posters. The gentle arts of development, of characterisation, of the conduct of a play may not be flouted95 with impunity96. The author more than the auditor97 is the loser. Wedekind works too often in bold, bright primary colours; only in some of his pieces is the modulation98 artistic, the character-drawing summary without being harsh. His climaxes99 usually go off like pistol-shots. Frühlings Erwachen (1891), the touching100 tale of Spring's Awakening in the heart of an innocent girl of fourteen, a child, Gretchen, doomed101 to tragic102 ending, set all Germany by the ears when it was first put on in the Kammerspielhaus, Berlin, by Director Reinhardt at the end of 1906. During fifteen years two editions had been sold, and the work was virtually unknown till its stage presentation. Mr. Shaw is right in saying that if you wish to make swift propaganda seek the theatre, not the pulpit, nor the book. With the majority Wedekind's name was anathema103. A certain minority called him the new Messiah, that was to lead youth into the [Pg 132] promised land of freedom. For a dramatist all is grist that makes revolve104 the sails of his advertising105 mill, and as there is nothing as lucrative106 as notoriety, Wedekind must have been happy.
He is a hard hitter and dearly loves a fight—a Hibernian trait—and his pen was soon transformed into a club, with which he rained blows on the ribs107 of his adversaries108. That he was a fanatical moralist was something not even the broadest-minded among them suspected; they only knew that he meddled109 with a subject that was hitherto considered tacenda, and with dire64 results. Nowadays the thesis of Spring's Awakening is not so novel. In England Mr. H. G. Wells was considerably110 exercised over the problem when he wrote in The New Machiavelli such a startling sentence as "Multitudes of us are trying to run this complex, modern community on a basis of 'hush,' without explaining to our children or discussing with them anything about love or marriage."
I find in Spring's Awakening a certain delicate poetic texture111 that the poet never succeeded in recapturing. His maiden112 is a dewy creature; she is also the saddest little wretch113 that was ever wept over in modern fiction. Her cry when she confesses the worst to her dazed mother is of a poignancy114. As for the boys, they are interesting. Evidently, the piece is an authentic115 document, but early as it was composed it displayed the principal characteristics of its [Pg 133] author: Freakishness, an abnormal sense of the grotesque116—witness that unearthly last scene, which must be taken as an hallucination—and its swift movement; also a vivid sense of caricature—consider the trial scene in the school; but created by a young poet of potential gifts. The seduction scene is well managed at the Kammerspielhaus. We are not shown the room, but a curtain slightly divided allows the voices of the youthful lovers to be overheard. A truly moving effect is thereby117 produced. Since the performance of this play, the world all over has seen a great light. Aside from the prefaces of Mr. Shaw on the subject of children and their education, plays, pamphlets, even legislation have dealt with the theme. A reaction was bound to follow, and we do not hear so much now about "sex initiation118" and coeducation. Suffice it to say that Frank Wedekind was the first man to put the question plumply before us in dramatic shape.
A favourite one-act piece is Der Kammers?nger (1899), which might be translated as The Wagner Singer, for therein is laid bare the soul of the Wagnerian tenor119, Gerardo, whose one week visit to a certain city results in both comedy and tragedy. He has concluded a brilliantly successful Gastspiel, singing several of the Wagnerian r?les, and when the curtain rises we see him getting his trunks in order, his room at the hotel filled with flowers and letters. He must sing Tristan the next night in Brussels, and has but an hour to [Pg 134] spare before his train departs. If he misses it his contract will be void, and in Europe that means business, tenor or no tenor. He sends the servant to pack his costumes, snatches up the score of Tristan, and as he hums it, he is aware that some one is lurking120 behind one of the window-curtains. It is a young miss, presumably English—she says: "Oh, yes"—and she confesses her infatuation. Vain as is our handsome singer he has no time for idle flirtations. He preaches a tonic121 sermon, the girl weeps, promises to be good, promises to study the music of Wagner instead of his tenors122, and leaves with a paternal123 kiss on her brow. The comedy is excellent, though you dimly recall a little play entitled: Fréderic Lema?tre. It is a partial variation on that theme. But what follows is of darker hue124. An old opera composer has sneaked125 by the guard at the door and begs with tears in his eyes that the singer will listen to his music. He is met with an angry refusal. Gradually, after he has explained his struggles of a half-century, he, the friend of Wagner, to secure a hearing of his work, the tenor, who is both brutal126 and generous, consents, though he is pressed for time. Then the tragedy of ill luck is unfolded. The poor musician doesn't know where to begin, fumbles127 in his score, while the tenor, who has just caught another woman behind a screen, a piano teacher—here we begin to graze the edge of burlesque—grows impatient, finally interrupts the composer, and [Pg 135] in scathing128 terms tells him what "art" really means to the world at large and how useless has been his sacrifice to that idol129 "art" with a capital "A." I don't know when I ever enjoyed the exposition of the musical temperament. The Concert, by Bahr, is mere37 trifling130 in comparison, all sawdust and simian131 gestures. We are a luxury for the bourgeois132, the tenor tells his listener, who do not care for the music or words we sing. If they realised the meanings of Walküre they would fly the opera-house. We singers, he continues, are slaves, not to our "art," but to the public; we have no private life.
He dismisses the old man.
Then a knock at the door, a fresh interruption. This time it is surely serious. A young, lovely society woman enters. She has been his love for the week, the understanding being that the affair is to terminate as it began, brusquely, without arrière-pensée. But she loves Gerardo. She clamours to be taken to Brussels. She will desert husband, children, social position, she will ruin her future to be with the man she adores. She is mad with the despair of parting. He is inexorable. He gently reminds her of their agreement. His contract does not permit him to travel in company with ladies, nor may he scandalise the community in which he resides. Tenors, too, must be circumspect133.
She swears she will kill herself. He smiles and bids her remember her family. She does shoot herself, and he sends for a policeman, remembering [Pg 136] that an arrest by superior force will but temporarily abrogate134 his contract. No policeman is found by the distracted hotel servants, and, exclaiming: "To-morrow evening I must sing Tristan in Brussels," the conscientious135 artist hurries away to his train, leaving the lifeless body of his admirer on the sofa. Played by a versatile actor, this piece ought to make a success in America, though the biting irony of the dialogue and the cold selfishness of the hero might not be "sympathetic" to our sentiment-loving audiences. The poet has protested in print against the alteration136 of the end of this little piece, i. e., one acting version made the impassioned lady only a pretended suicide, which quite spoils the motivation.
Ibsen must have felt sick when such an artist as Duse asked him to let her make Nora in Doll's House return to her family. But he is said to have consented. Wedekind consented, because he was ill, but he made his protest, and justly so.
The Marquis of Keith is a larger canvas. It is a modern rogues' comedy. Barry Lyndon is hardly more entertaining. The marquis is the son of an humble137 tutor in the house of a count whose son later figures as Ernest Scholtz. The marquis is a swindler in the grand manner. He is a Get-Rich-Quick Wallingford, for he has lived in the United States, but instead of a lively sketch138 is a full-length portrait painted by a master. You like him despite his scampishness. [Pg 137] He is witty. He has a heart—for his own woes—and seems intensely interested in all the women he loves and swindles. He goes to Munich, where he invents a huge scheme for an exhibition palace and fools several worthy139 and wealthy brewers, but not the powerful Consul140 Casimir, the one man necessary to his comprehensive operation. When his unhappy wife tells him there is no bread in the house for the next day, he retorts: "Very well, then we shall dine at the Hotel Continental141." Nothing depresses his mercurial142 spirits. He borrows from Peter to pay Paul, and an hour later borrows from Paul to pay himself. His boyhood friend he simply plunders143. This Ernest, in reality the Graf von Trautenau, is an idealist of the type that Wedekind is fond of delineating. He would save the world from itself, rescue it from the morass144 of materialism145, but he relapses into a pathological mysticism which ends in a sanitarium for nervous troubles. The marquis is a Mephisto; he is not without a trace of idealism; altogether a baffling nature, Faust-like, and as chock-full of humour as an egg is full of meat. He goes to smash. His plans are checkmated. His beloved deserts him for the enemy. His wife commits suicide. His life threatened, and his liberty precarious, he takes ten thousand marks from Consul Casimir, whose name he has forged in a telegram, and with a grin starts for pastures new. Will he shoot himself? No! After all, life is very much like shooting the [Pg 138] chutes. The curtain falls. This stirring and technically146 excellent comedy has never been a favourite in Germany. Perhaps its cynicism is too crass147. It achieved only a few performances in Berlin to the accompaniment of catcalls, hisses148, and derisive149 laughter. I wonder why? It is entertaining, with all its revelation of a rascally150 mean soul and its shady episodes.
Space, I am sorry to say, forbids me from further exposition of such strong little pieces as Musik, a heart-breaking drama of a betrayed girl studying singing who goes to jail while the real offender152, the man, remains153 at liberty (1907), or of Die Zensur, with its discussion of art and religion—the poet intrudes—and its terrible cry at the close: "Oh, God! why art thou so unfathomable?" Or of the so-called Lulu tragedy (Erdgeist and The Box of Pandora) of which I like the first act of the former and the second act of the latter—you are reminded at this point of the gambling154 scene in Sardou's Fernande—but as I do not care to sup on such unmitigated horrors, I prefer to let my readers judge for themselves from the printed plays.
Karl Hetman is an absorbing play in which a man loses the world but remains captain of his soul; actually he ends his life rather than exhibit himself as motley to the multitude. As a foil for the idealist Hetman—who is a sort of inverted155 Nietzsche; also a self-portrait in part of the dramatist—there is the self-seeking scamp Launhart who succeeds with the very [Pg 139] ideas which Hetman couldn't make viable156, ideas in fact which brought about his disaster. They are two finely contrasted portraits, and what a grimace157 of disgust is aroused when Launhart tells the woman who loves Hetman: "O Fanny, Fanny, a living rascal151 is better for your welfare than the greatest of dead prophets." What Dead-Sea-fruit wisdom! The pathos158 of distance doesn't appeal to the contemporary soul of Wedekind. He writes for the young, that is, for to-morrow.
The caprice, the bizarre, the morbid in Wedekind are more than redeemed159 by his rich humanity. He loves his fellow man even when he castigates160 him. He is very emotional, also pragmatic. The second act of his Franziska, a Karnevalgroteske, was given at the Dresden Pressfestival, February 7, 1913, with the title of Matrimony in the Year 2000, the author and his wife appearing in the leading r?les with brilliant success. It contains in solution the leading motives161 from all his plays and his philosophy of life. It is fantastic, as fantastic as Strindberg's Dream Play, but amusing. In 1914 his biblical drama, Simson (Samson), was produced with mixed success.
Translated Wedekind would lose his native wood-note wild, and doubtless much of his dynamic force—for on the English stage he would be emasculated. And I wonder who would have the courage to produce his works.
Musik, for example, if played in its entirety [Pg 140] might create a profound impression. It is pathetically moving and the part of the unhappy girl, who is half crazy because of her passion for her singing-master, is a r?le for an accomplished actress. If the public can endure Brieux's Damaged Goods, why not Musik? The latter is a typical case and is excellent drama; the French play is neither. For me all the man is summed up in the cry of one of his characters in Erdgeist: "Who gives me back my faith in mankind, will give me back my life." An idealist, surely.
The last time I saw him was at the Richard Strauss festival in Stuttgart, October, 1912. He had changed but little and still reminded me of both David Belasco and an Irish Catholic priest. In his eyes there lurked162 the "dancing-madness" of which Robert Louis Stevenson writes. A latter-day pagan, with touches of the perverse163, the grotesque, and the poetic; thus seems to me Frank Wedekind.
点击收听单词发音
1 deceptive | |
adj.骗人的,造成假象的,靠不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 warrior | |
n.勇士,武士,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 slashing | |
adj.尖锐的;苛刻的;鲜明的;乱砍的v.挥砍( slash的现在分词 );鞭打;割破;削减 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 outraged | |
a.震惊的,义愤填膺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 awakening | |
n.觉醒,醒悟 adj.觉醒中的;唤醒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 shudder | |
v.战粟,震动,剧烈地摇晃;n.战粟,抖动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 atrocities | |
n.邪恶,暴行( atrocity的名词复数 );滔天大罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 ass | |
n.驴;傻瓜,蠢笨的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 constraint | |
n.(on)约束,限制;限制(或约束)性的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 foe | |
n.敌人,仇敌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tricky | |
adj.狡猾的,奸诈的;(工作等)棘手的,微妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 poetic | |
adj.富有诗意的,有诗人气质的,善于抒情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 wilderness | |
n.杳无人烟的一片陆地、水等,荒漠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 hampered | |
妨碍,束缚,限制( hamper的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 bondage | |
n.奴役,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 countenances | |
n.面容( countenance的名词复数 );表情;镇静;道义支持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 demolishing | |
v.摧毁( demolish的现在分词 );推翻;拆毁(尤指大建筑物);吃光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 pedant | |
n.迂儒;卖弄学问的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 peculiarity | |
n.独特性,特色;特殊的东西;怪癖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 forerunners | |
n.先驱( forerunner的名词复数 );开路人;先兆;前兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 followers | |
追随者( follower的名词复数 ); 用户; 契据的附面; 从动件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 sinister | |
adj.不吉利的,凶恶的,左边的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 pessimism | |
n.悲观者,悲观主义者,厌世者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 prologue | |
n.开场白,序言;开端,序幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 multiplication | |
n.增加,增多,倍增;增殖,繁殖;乘法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 neurotic | |
adj.神经病的,神经过敏的;n.神经过敏者,神经病患者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 hysterical | |
adj.情绪异常激动的,歇斯底里般的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 passionately | |
ad.热烈地,激烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 shackles | |
手铐( shackle的名词复数 ); 脚镣; 束缚; 羁绊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 engrossing | |
adj.使人全神贯注的,引人入胜的v.使全神贯注( engross的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 degenerates | |
衰退,堕落,退化( degenerate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 irritable | |
adj.急躁的;过敏的;易怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 subterranean | |
adj.地下的,地表下的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 abhorrent | |
adj.可恶的,可恨的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 versatility | |
n.多才多艺,多样性,多功能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 morbid | |
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 tug | |
v.用力拖(或拉);苦干;n.拖;苦干;拖船 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 witty | |
adj.机智的,风趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 imperturbably | |
adv.泰然地,镇静地,平静地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 presto | |
adv.急速地;n.急板乐段;adj.急板的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 farce | |
n.闹剧,笑剧,滑稽戏;胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 rogues | |
n.流氓( rogue的名词复数 );无赖;调皮捣蛋的人;离群的野兽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 stark | |
adj.荒凉的;严酷的;完全的;adv.完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 drudgery | |
n.苦工,重活,单调乏味的工作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 muse | |
n.缪斯(希腊神话中的女神),创作灵感 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 fanatics | |
狂热者,入迷者( fanatic的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 shimmers | |
n.闪闪发光,发微光( shimmer的名词复数 )v.闪闪发光,发微光( shimmer的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 precarious | |
adj.不安定的,靠不住的;根据不足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 dire | |
adj.可怕的,悲惨的,阴惨的,极端的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 extravagant | |
adj.奢侈的;过分的;(言行等)放肆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 versatile | |
adj.通用的,万用的;多才多艺的,多方面的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 interpretations | |
n.解释( interpretation的名词复数 );表演;演绎;理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 amateurish | |
n.业余爱好的,不熟练的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 poignant | |
adj.令人痛苦的,辛酸的,惨痛的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 lampoon | |
n.讽刺文章;v.讽刺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 penitentiary | |
n.感化院;监狱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 scenic | |
adj.自然景色的,景色优美的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 outraging | |
引起…的义愤,激怒( outrage的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 expunge | |
v.除去,删掉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 imprisonment | |
n.关押,监禁,坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 elusive | |
adj.难以表达(捉摸)的;令人困惑的;逃避的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 practitioner | |
n.实践者,从事者;(医生或律师等)开业者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 ineptitude | |
n.不适当;愚笨,愚昧的言行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 vile | |
adj.卑鄙的,可耻的,邪恶的;坏透的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 gem | |
n.宝石,珠宝;受爱戴的人 [同]jewel | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 posterity | |
n.后裔,子孙,后代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 acrobatics | |
n.杂技 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 flouted | |
v.藐视,轻视( flout的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 impunity | |
n.(惩罚、损失、伤害等的)免除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 auditor | |
n.审计员,旁听着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 modulation | |
n.调制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 climaxes | |
n.顶点( climax的名词复数 );极点;高潮;性高潮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 touching | |
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 doomed | |
命定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 tragic | |
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 anathema | |
n.诅咒;被诅咒的人(物),十分讨厌的人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 revolve | |
vi.(使)旋转;循环出现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 advertising | |
n.广告业;广告活动 a.广告的;广告业务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 lucrative | |
adj.赚钱的,可获利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 ribs | |
n.肋骨( rib的名词复数 );(船或屋顶等的)肋拱;肋骨状的东西;(织物的)凸条花纹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 adversaries | |
n.对手,敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 meddled | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 texture | |
n.(织物)质地;(材料)构造;结构;肌理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 maiden | |
n.少女,处女;adj.未婚的,纯洁的,无经验的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 wretch | |
n.可怜的人,不幸的人;卑鄙的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 poignancy | |
n.辛酸事,尖锐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 authentic | |
a.真的,真正的;可靠的,可信的,有根据的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 grotesque | |
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 initiation | |
n.开始 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 tenor | |
n.男高音(歌手),次中音(乐器),要旨,大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 lurking | |
潜在 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 tonic | |
n./adj.滋补品,补药,强身的,健体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 tenors | |
n.男高音( tenor的名词复数 );大意;男高音歌唱家;(文件的)抄本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 paternal | |
adj.父亲的,像父亲的,父系的,父方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 hue | |
n.色度;色调;样子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 sneaked | |
v.潜行( sneak的过去式和过去分词 );偷偷溜走;(儿童向成人)打小报告;告状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 fumbles | |
摸索,笨拙的处理( fumble的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 idol | |
n.偶像,红人,宠儿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 trifling | |
adj.微不足道的;没什么价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 simian | |
adj.似猿猴的;n.类人猿,猴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 bourgeois | |
adj./n.追求物质享受的(人);中产阶级分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 circumspect | |
adj.慎重的,谨慎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 abrogate | |
v.废止,废除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 conscientious | |
adj.审慎正直的,认真的,本着良心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 alteration | |
n.变更,改变;蚀变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 humble | |
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 sketch | |
n.草图;梗概;素描;v.素描;概述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 consul | |
n.领事;执政官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 mercurial | |
adj.善变的,活泼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 plunders | |
掠夺,抢劫( plunder的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 morass | |
n.沼泽,困境 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 materialism | |
n.[哲]唯物主义,唯物论;物质至上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 crass | |
adj.愚钝的,粗糙的;彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 hisses | |
嘶嘶声( hiss的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 derisive | |
adj.嘲弄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 rascally | |
adj. 无赖的,恶棍的 adv. 无赖地,卑鄙地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 rascal | |
n.流氓;不诚实的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 offender | |
n.冒犯者,违反者,犯罪者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 gambling | |
n.赌博;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 inverted | |
adj.反向的,倒转的v.使倒置,使反转( invert的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 viable | |
adj.可行的,切实可行的,能活下去的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 grimace | |
v.做鬼脸,面部歪扭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 pathos | |
n.哀婉,悲怆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 redeemed | |
adj. 可赎回的,可救赎的 动词redeem的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 castigates | |
v.严厉责骂、批评或惩罚(某人)( castigate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 lurked | |
vi.潜伏,埋伏(lurk的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 perverse | |
adj.刚愎的;坚持错误的,行为反常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |