ENVER AGAIN MOVES FOR PEACE—FAREWELL TO THE SULTAN AND TO TURKEY
My failure to prevent the destruction of the Armenians had made Turkey for me a place of horror, and I found intolerable my further daily association with men who, however gracious and accommodating and good-natured they might have been to the American Ambassador, were still reeking1 with the blood of nearly a million human beings. Could I have done anything more, either for Americans, enemy aliens, or the persecuted2 peoples of the Empire, I would willingly have stayed. The position of Americans and Europeans, however, had now become secure, and, so far as the subject peoples were concerned, I had reached the end of my resources. Moreover, an event was approaching in the United States which, I believed, would inevitably3 have the greatest influence upon the future of the world and of democracy—the presidential campaign. I felt that there was nothing so important in international politics as the re-election of President Wilson. I could imagine no greater calamity4 for the United States and the world than that the American nation should fail to heartily5 endorse6 this great statesman. If I could substantially assist in Mr. Wilson’s re-election, I concluded that I was certainly wasting valuable time in this remote part of the world.
I had another practical reason for returning home, and that was to give the President and the State Department, by word of mouth, such first-hand information as I possessed7 on the European situation. It was especially important to give them the latest sidelights on the subject of peace. In the latter part of 1915 and the early part of 1916 this was the uppermost topic in Constantinople. Enver Pasha was constantly asking me to intercede8 with the President to end the war. Several times he intimated that Turkey was war-weary and that its salvation9 depended on getting an early peace. I have already described the conditions that prevailed a few months after the outbreak of the war, but by the end of 1915 they were infinitely10 worse. When Turkey decided11 on the deportation12 and massacre13 of her subject peoples, especially the Armenians and Greeks, she had signed her own economic death warrant. These were the people,{254} as I have already said, who controlled her industries and her finance and developed her agriculture, and the material consequences of this great national crime now began to be everywhere apparent. The farms were lying uncultivated and thousands of peasants were daily dying of starvation. As the Armenians and Greeks were the largest taxpayers14, their annihilation greatly reduced the State revenues, and the fact that practically all Turkish ports were blockaded had shut off customs collections. The mere15 statement that Turkey was barely taking in money enough to pay the interest on her debt, to say nothing of ordinary expenses and war expenses, gives a fair idea of her advanced degree of bankruptcy16. In these facts Turkey had abundant reasons for desiring a speedy peace. Besides this, Enver and the ruling party feared a revolution unless the war quickly came to an end. As I wrote the State Department about this time, “these men are willing to do almost anything to retain their power.”
Still, I did not take Enver’s importunities for peace any too seriously.
“Are you speaking for yourself and your party in this matter,” I asked him, “or do you really speak for Germany also? I cannot submit a proposition from you unless the Germans are back of you. Have you consulted them about this?”
“No,” Enver replied, “but I know how they feel.”
“That is not sufficient,” I answered; “you had better communicate with them directly through the German Embassy. I would not be willing to submit a proposition that was not endorsed17 by all the Teutonic Allies.”
Enver replied that he did not think it worth while to discuss the matter with the German Ambassador. He said, however, that he was just leaving for Orsova, a town on the Bulgarian and Rumanian frontier, where he was to have a conference with Falkenhayn, at that time the German Chief-of-Staff. Falkenhayn, said Enver, was the important man; he would take up the question of peace with him.
“Why do you think that it is a good time to discuss peace now?” I asked.
“Because in two weeks we shall have completely annihilated18 Serbia. We think that will put the Allies in a frame of mind to discuss peace. My visit to Falkenhayn is to complete arrangements for the invasion of Egypt. In a very few days we expect Greece to join us. We are already preparing tons or provisions and fodder19 to send to Greece. And when we get Greece, of course, Rumania will come in. When the Greeks and Rumanians{255} join us we shall have a million fresh troops. We shall get all the guns and ammunition20 we need from Germany as soon as the direct railroad is opened. All these things make it an excellent time for us to take up the matter of peace.”
I asked the Minister of War to talk the matter over with Falkenhayn in his proposed interview, and report to me when he returned. In some way this conversation came to the ears of the new German Ambassador, Graf von Metternich, who immediately called to discuss the subject. He apparently21 wished to impress upon me two things: that Germany would never surrender Alsace-Lorraine and that she would insist on the return of all her colonies. I replied that it was apparently useless to discuss peace unless England first won some great military victory.
“That may be so,” replied the Graf, “but you can hardly expect that Germany shall let England win such a victory merely to put her in a frame of mind to consider peace. But I think that you are wrong. It is a mistake to say that Great Britain has not already won great victories. I think that she has several very substantial ones to her credit. Just consider what she has done. She has established her unquestioned supremacy22 of the seas and driven off all German commerce. She has not only not lost a foot of her own territory, but she has gained enormous new domains23. She has annexed24 Cyprus and Egypt and has conquered all the German colonies. She is in possession of a considerable part of Mesopotamia. How absurd to say that England has gained nothing by the war!”
On December 1st Enver came to the American Embassy and reported the results of his interview with Falkenhayn. The German Chief-of-Staff had said that Germany would very much like to discuss peace, but that Germany could not state her terms in advance, as such an action would be generally interpreted as a sign of weakness. But one thing could be depended on: the Allies could obtain far more favourable25 terms at that moment than at any future time. Enver told me that the Germans would be willing to surrender all the territory they had taken from the French and practically all of Belgium. But the one thing on which they had definitely settled was the permanent dismemberment of Serbia. Not an acre of Macedonia would be returned to Serbia, and even parts of old Serbia would be retained; that is, Serbia would become a much smaller country than she had been before the Balkan Wars and, in fact, she would practically disappear as an independent State. The meaning of all this was apparent, even then. Germany had won the object{256} for which she had really gone to war: a complete route from Berlin to Constantinople and the East. Part, and a good part, of the Pan-German “Mittel Europa” had thus become an accomplished26 military fact. Apparently Germany was willing to give up the overrun provinces of Northern France and Belgium, provided that the Entente27 would consent to her retention28 of these conquests. The proposal which Falkenhayn made then did not materially differ from that which he put forward in the latter part of 1918(?). This Enver-Falkenhayn interview, as reported to me, shows that it is no suddenly conceived German plan, but that it has been Germany’s scheme from the first.
In all this I saw no particular promise of an early peace. Yet I thought that I should lay these facts before the President. I therefore applied29 to Washington for a leave of absence, which was granted.
I had my farewell interview with Enver and Talaat on January 13th. Both men were in their most delightful30 mood. Evidently both were turning over in their minds, as was I, all the momentous31 events that had taken place in Turkey and in the world since my first meeting with them two years before. Then Talaat and Enver were merely desperate adventurers who had reached high position by assassination32 and intrigue33. Their position was insecure, for at any moment another revolution might plunge34 them into the obscurity from which they had sprung. But now they were the unquestioned despots of the Ottoman Empire, the allies of the then strongest military power in the world, and the conquerors—at least, they so regarded themselves—of the British Navy. At this moment of their great triumph—the Allied35 expedition to the Dardanelles had evacuated36 their positions only two weeks before—both Talaat and Enver regarded their country again as a world power.
“I hear you are going home to spend a lot of money and re-elect your President,” said Talaat—this being a jocular reference to the fact that I was the Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Democratic National Committee. “That’s very foolish; why don’t you stay here and give it to Turkey? We need it more than your people do.
“But we hope you are coming back soon,” he added. “We feel almost as though you were one of us. You and we have really grown up together; you came here about the same time that we took office and we don’t know how we could ever get so well acquainted with another man. We have grown fond of you, too. We have had our differences, and pretty lively ones at times, but we have always found you fair, and we respect American{257} policy in Turkey as you have represented it. We don’t like to see you go, even for a few months.”
I expressed my pleasure at these words.
“It’s very nice to hear you talk that way,” I answered. “Since you flatter me so much, I know that you will be willing to promise me certain things. Since I have you both here together, this is my chance to put you on record. Will you treat the people in my charge considerately, just the same as though I were here?”
“As to the American missionaries37 and colleges and schools,” said Talaat, and Enver assented38, “we give you an absolute promise. They will not be molested39 in the slightest degree, but can go on doing their work just the same as before. Your mind can rest easily on that score.”
“How about the British and French?” I asked.
“Oh, well,” said Talaat, smiling, “we may have to have a little fun with them now and then, but don’t worry. We’ll take good care of them.”
And now for the last time I spoke40 on the subject that had rested so heavily on my mind for many months. I feared that another appeal would be useless, but I decided to make it.
“How about the Armenians?”
Talaat’s geniality41 disappeared in an instant. His face hardened, and the fire of the beast lighted up his eyes once more.
“What’s the use of speaking about them?” he said, waving his hand. “We are through with them. That’s all over.”
Such was my farewell with Talaat. “That’s all over” were his last words to me.
The next day I had my farewell audience with the Sultan. He was the same gracious, kindly42 old gentleman that I had first met two years before. He received me informally, in civilian43 European clothes, and asked me to sit down with him. We talked for twenty minutes, discussing, among other things, the pleasant relations that prevailed between America and Turkey. He thanked me for the interest which I had taken in his country and hoped that I would soon return. Then he took up the question of war and peace.
“Every monarch44 naturally desires peace,” he said. “None of us approve the shedding of blood. But there are times when war seems unavoidable. We may wish to settle our disputes amicably45, but we cannot always do it. This seems to be one of them. I told the British Ambassador that we did not wish to go to war with his country. I tell you the same thing now. But Turkey had to defend her rights. Russia attacked us, and{258} naturally we had to defend ourselves. Thus the war was not the result of any planning on our part, it was an act of Allah—it was fate.”
I expressed the hope that it might soon be over.
“Yes, we wish peace also,” replied His Majesty46. “But it must be a peace that will guarantee the rights of our Empire. I am sure that a civilised and flourishing country like America wants peace, and she should exert all her efforts to bring about a peace that shall be permanent.”
One of the Sultan’s statements in this interview left a lasting47 impression. This was his assertion that “Russia attacked us.” That the simple-minded old gentleman believed this was apparent; it was also clear that he knew nothing of the real facts—that Turkish warships48, under German officers, had plunged49 Turkey into the war by bombarding Russian seaports50. Instead of telling him the truth, the Young Turk leaders had foisted51 upon the Sultan this fiction of Russia as the aggressor. The interview showed precisely52 to what extent the ostensible53 ruler of Turkey was acquainted with the crucial facts in the government of his own Empire.
In our interview Talaat and Enver had not said their final farewells, telling me that they would meet me at the station. A few minutes before the train started Bedri came up, rather pale-faced and excited, and brought me their apologies.
“They cannot come,” he said, “the Crown Prince has just committed suicide!”
I knew the Crown Prince well and I had expected to have him as a fellow-passenger to Berlin; he was about to make a trip to Germany, and his special car was attached to this train. I had seen much of Youssouf Izzeddin; he had several times invited me to call upon him, and we had spent many hours talking over the United States and American institutions, in which subject he had always displayed the keenest interest. Many times had he told me that he would like to introduce certain American governmental ideas in Turkey. The morning when we were leaving for Berlin the Crown Prince was found lying on the floor in his villa54, bathed in a pool of blood, with his arteries55 cut. Youssouf was the son of Abdul-Aziz, Sultan from 1861 to 1876, who, gruesomely enough, had ended his days by opening his arteries forty years before. The circumstances surrounding the death of father and son were thus precisely the same. The fact that Youssouf was strongly pro-Ally, that he had opposed Turkey’s participation56 in the war on Germany’s side, and that he was extremely antagonistic57 to the Committee of union and{259} Progress gave rise to many suspicions. I know nothing about the stories that now went from mouth to mouth, and merely record that the official report on the death was that it was a case of “suicide.”
“On l’a suicidé” (they have suicided him!), remarked a witty58 Frenchman, when this verdict was reported.
This tragic59 announcement naturally cast a gloom over our party as our train pulled out of Constantinople, but the journey proved to be full of interest. I was now on the famous Balkanzug, and this was only the second trip which it had made to Berlin. My room was No. 13; several people came to look at it, telling me that, on the outward trip, the train had been shot at, and a window of my apartment broken!
Soon after we started I discovered that Admiral Usedom was one of my fellow-passengers. Usedom had had a distinguished60 career in the Navy; among other things he had been captain of the Hohenzollern, the Kaiser’s yacht, and thus was upon friendly terms with His Majesty. The last time I had seen Usedom was on my visit to the Dardanelles, where he had been Inspector-General of the Ottoman defences. As soon as we met again the Admiral began to talk about the abortive61 Allied attack. He again made no secret of the fears which he had then entertained that this attack would succeed.
“Several times,” he said, “we thought that they were on the verge62 of getting through. All of us down there were very much distressed63 and depressed64 over the prospect65. We owed much to the heroism66 of the Turks and their willingness to sacrifice an unlimited67 number of human lives. It is all over now—that part of our task is finished.”
The Admiral thought that the British landing-party had been badly prepared, though he spoke admiringly of the skill with which the Allies had managed their retreat. I also obtained further light on the German attitude toward the Armenian massacres68. Usedom made no attempt to justify69 them; neither did he blame the Turks. He discussed the whole thing calmly, dispassionately, and merely as a military problem, and one would never have guessed from his remarks that the lives of a million human beings had been involved. He simply said that the Armenians were in the way, that they were an obstacle to German success, and that it had therefore been necessary to remove them, just like so much useless lumber70. He spoke about them as detachedly as one would speak about removing a row of houses in order to bombard a city.
Poor Serbia! As our train sped through her devastated{260} valleys I had a picture of what the war had meant to this brave little country. In the last two years this nation had stood alone, practically unassisted by her allies, attempting to stem the rush of Pan-German conquest, just as, for three centuries, she had stood as a bulwark71 against the onslaughts of the Turks. And she had paid the penalty. Practically every farm we passed was abandoned, overgrown with weeds and full of debris72, and the buildings were usually roofless and sometimes razed73 to the ground. Whenever we crossed a stream we saw the remains74 of a dynamited75 bridge; in all cases the Germans had built new ones to replace those which had been destroyed. We saw many women and children, looking ragged76 and half-starved, but, significantly, we saw very few men, for all had either been killed or they were in the ranks of Serbia’s still existing and valiant77 little army. All this time trainloads of German soldiers were passing us or standing78 on the switches at the stations where we slowed up, a sufficient explanation for all the misery79 and devastation80 we saw on our way.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
reeking
|
|
| v.发出浓烈的臭气( reek的现在分词 )；散发臭气；发出难闻的气味 (of sth)；明显带有（令人不快或生疑的跡象） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
persecuted
|
|
| （尤指宗教或政治信仰的）迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 )； 烦扰，困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
inevitably
|
|
| adv.不可避免地；必然发生地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
calamity
|
|
| n.灾害，祸患，不幸事件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
heartily
|
|
| adv.衷心地，诚恳地，十分，很 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
endorse
|
|
| vt.(支票、汇票等)背书，背署；批注；同意 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
possessed
|
|
| adj.疯狂的；拥有的，占有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
intercede
|
|
| vi.仲裁，说情 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
salvation
|
|
| n.（尤指基督）救世，超度，拯救，解困 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
infinitely
|
|
| adv.无限地，无穷地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
decided
|
|
| adj.决定了的，坚决的；明显的，明确的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
deportation
|
|
| n.驱逐，放逐 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
massacre
|
|
| n.残杀，大屠杀；v.残杀，集体屠杀 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
taxpayers
|
|
| 纳税人，纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
bankruptcy
|
|
| n.破产；无偿付能力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
endorsed
|
|
| vt.& vi.endorse的过去式或过去分词形式v.赞同( endorse的过去式和过去分词 )；在（尤指支票的）背面签字；在（文件的）背面写评论；在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
annihilated
|
|
| v.（彻底）消灭( annihilate的过去式和过去分词 )；使无效；废止；彻底击溃 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
fodder
|
|
| n.草料；炮灰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
ammunition
|
|
| n.军火，弹药 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地；表面上，似乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
supremacy
|
|
| n.至上；至高权力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
domains
|
|
| n.范围( domain的名词复数 )；领域；版图；地产 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
annexed
|
|
| [法] 附加的，附属的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
favourable
|
|
| adj.赞成的，称赞的，有利的，良好的，顺利的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
accomplished
|
|
| adj.有才艺的；有造诣的；达到了的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
entente
|
|
| n.协定；有协定关系的各国 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
retention
|
|
| n.保留，保持，保持力，记忆力 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
applied
|
|
| adj.应用的；v.应用，适用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
delightful
|
|
| adj.令人高兴的，使人快乐的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
momentous
|
|
| adj.重要的，重大的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
assassination
|
|
| n.暗杀；暗杀事件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
intrigue
|
|
| vt.激起兴趣，迷住；vi.耍阴谋；n.阴谋，密谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
plunge
|
|
| v.跳入，(使)投入，(使)陷入；猛冲 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
allied
|
|
| adj.协约国的；同盟国的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
evacuated
|
|
| 撤退者的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
missionaries
|
|
| n.传教士( missionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
assented
|
|
| 同意，赞成( assent的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
molested
|
|
| v.骚扰( molest的过去式和过去分词 )；干扰；调戏；猥亵 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
geniality
|
|
| n.和蔼，诚恳；愉快 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
kindly
|
|
| adj.和蔼的，温和的，爽快的；adv.温和地，亲切地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
civilian
|
|
| adj.平民的，民用的，民众的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
monarch
|
|
| n.帝王，君主，最高统治者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
amicably
|
|
| adv.友善地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
majesty
|
|
| n.雄伟，壮丽，庄严，威严；最高权威，王权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
lasting
|
|
| adj.永久的，永恒的；vbl.持续，维持 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
warships
|
|
| 军舰，战舰( warship的名词复数 )； 舰只 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
plunged
|
|
| v.颠簸( plunge的过去式和过去分词 )；暴跌；骤降；突降 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
seaports
|
|
| n.海港( seaport的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
foisted
|
|
| 强迫接受，把…强加于( foist的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
precisely
|
|
| adv.恰好，正好，精确地，细致地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
ostensible
|
|
| adj.(指理由)表面的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
villa
|
|
| n.别墅，城郊小屋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
arteries
|
|
| n.动脉( artery的名词复数 )；干线，要道 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
participation
|
|
| n.参与，参加，分享 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
antagonistic
|
|
| adj.敌对的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
witty
|
|
| adj.机智的，风趣的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
tragic
|
|
| adj.悲剧的，悲剧性的，悲惨的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
distinguished
|
|
| adj.卓越的，杰出的，著名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
abortive
|
|
| adj.不成功的，发育不全的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
verge
|
|
| n.边，边缘；v.接近，濒临 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
distressed
|
|
| 痛苦的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
depressed
|
|
| adj.沮丧的，抑郁的，不景气的，萧条的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
prospect
|
|
| n.前景，前途；景色，视野 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
heroism
|
|
| n.大无畏精神，英勇 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
unlimited
|
|
| adj.无限的，不受控制的，无条件的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
massacres
|
|
| 大屠杀( massacre的名词复数 )； 惨败 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
justify
|
|
| vt.证明…正当(或有理)，为…辩护 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
lumber
|
|
| n.木材，木料；v.以破旧东西堆满；伐木；笨重移动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
bulwark
|
|
| n.堡垒，保障，防御 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
debris
|
|
| n.瓦砾堆，废墟，碎片 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
razed
|
|
| v.彻底摧毁，将…夷为平地( raze的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
dynamited
|
|
| v.（尤指用于采矿的）甘油炸药( dynamite的过去式和过去分词 )；会引起轰动的人[事物] | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
ragged
|
|
| adj.衣衫褴褛的，粗糙的，刺耳的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
valiant
|
|
| adj.勇敢的，英勇的；n.勇士，勇敢的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
standing
|
|
| n.持续，地位；adj.永久的，不动的，直立的，不流动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
misery
|
|
| n.痛苦，苦恼，苦难；悲惨的境遇，贫苦 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
devastation
|
|
| n.毁坏；荒废；极度震惊或悲伤 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |