It is not easy to realize that it was only a single generation ago when we used to think that the animals are ruled by instinct, man by reason. We know better now. What was once the “new” psychology1 has taught us that man has more separate instincts than any other creature that breathes, and that however superior his rational life, it is still based upon a substructure of primitive2 instincts which he shares with the beasts of the field.
The newborn infant feels on his skin the air of a cold world, and sucks in his first breath without knowing how or why. He manages, the first time he tries, about as well as he ever will, the decidedly complex operation of taking breath and food at the same time, crossing the two streams in his73 throat, and sending each to its proper destination without confusion with the other. When the proper time comes, the child who has gone on all fours like an animal gets up on his hind3 legs to walk like a man.
We are all of us, therefore, man and animals alike, born with the particular set of instincts which prompt us, without our taking thought, to whatever acts are essential to our physical life. Some of these instincts are active at birth; more lie dormant4, to ripen5 and manifest themselves only at the proper age, each in its proper time. The impulse to walk and to utter words comes suddenly, in babyhood. The mating instincts appear only toward the end of adolescence6. Metchnikoff will have it that at the end of a well-spent life, an instinctive7 longing8 for death replaces the will to live.
The physical differences between boys and girls are strikingly correlated with a difference in instinctive interests. Brought up alike, in a hundred little ways they are dissimilar. I have seen at a children’s party, on the advent9 of a baby, every little girl74 leave the supper table to surround the new-comer, while every little boy kept on with his meal. Where the girl plays with dolls, the boy plays with bats and balls.
Among other divergences10, the boy forms gangs. Girls do not form gangs. They belong to sets, and sets and gangs are quite different institutions. The set is exclusive, undemocratic. It has no organization, leaders, history, and it owns no property. The set snubs its rivals; the gang fights them. The members of a set also snub one another, quarrel, and backbite11. There is none of the deep-seated, instinctive loyalty12 which the members of a gang have for each other. The normal boy may fight his friend; he does not “get mad at” him.
All this is only one aspect of the deep-seated difference between “the only two kinds of people there are in the world, men and women.” Barring dolls and the ability to hurl13 missiles, little girls and little boys, as they emerge from babyhood, are not so very unlike. But somewhere about the age of ten, the little boy begins to undergo a75 transformation14, which in the girl never takes place at all. He begins to develop the gang-forming instinct. He begins to want to do things which he cannot do at all alone; and cannot, moreover, do with any real satisfaction except in conjunction with a special group of his fellows. The once friendly boy becomes shy of adults, so that only the rare man or woman can retain his full confidence. Girls he scorns. His games tend now to be of the co?perative type, in which there is a definitely organized side, with a leader and more or less specialized15 functions among the players, and where one side wins or loses to the other as a whole. It is no longer each for himself, but each for the team. A girl can be taught to like this kind of game; a boy takes to it like a duck to water.
Apparently16, then, a boy joins a gang and a girl does not for precisely17 the same reason that he throws stones while his sister tends lovingly the dolls that are beneath his contempt. Each is doing instinctively18, as a child, for play, what grown men and women have been doing these thousand years for work.
76 For obviously the instinctive activities of the boys’ gang are the necessary duties of the savage19 man. The civilized20 boy hunts, fishes, fights, builds huts in the woods, stands loyally by his fellows, and treats all outsiders with suspicion or cruelty, and in general lives the life and thinks the thoughts of the savage man. He is, for the moment, a savage; and he instinctively “plays Indians” as the real savage lives them.
General opinion has it that the boy instinctively plays Indians and follows the so-called tribal21 occupations as the direct result of his inheritance from some thousands of generations of savage ancestors who, willy nilly, have been doing these things all their lives. We commonly believe that the normal boy is possessed22 to throw stones at every moving object because his forebears got their livings or preserved their lives by throwing all sorts of missiles at prey23 and enemies, so that the fascination24 of sticks and clubs is but the reverberation25 of the not so very far off days when sticks and clubs were man’s only weapons.
77 According to this doctrine26, such a game as baseball is an epitome27 of man’s prehistoric28 activities. To throw accurately29 and to run swiftly, to hit a quick-moving object with a club, is to revive, symbolically30, the most absorbing of ancestral activities and the most vivid of ancestral memories. As the girl, tending her doll, is recapitulating31 the experiences of a hundred thousand mothers before her, so the boy, in the varied32 activities of his gang, is reproducing the life of long departed clans33 and tribes. The instinctive interests of both boys and girls are the result of the experiences of their ancestors.
All this, one need not point out, is the familiar recapitulation theory, the doctrine, that is to say, that the young of each species, our own included, tends to reproduce in the course of its youth the successive stages in the history of its ancestors. We are by turns invertebrates34, gill-breathing vertebrates, lung-breathing vertebrates (we make the great change at birth), little monkeys, little savages35, and finally civilized men and women.
It is an illuminating36 theory, and one, moreover,78 which goes far toward explaining many aspects of our human nature which without it would be largely meaningless. Especially is it the key to the behavior of boys at the gang age. The normal boy between ten and sixteen is really living through the historic period which, for the races of northern Europe, began somewhere this side of the glacial period, and came to an end with, let us say, the early middle ages. He is, therefore, essentially37 a savage, with the interests of a savage, the body of a savage, and to no small extent, the soul of one. He thinks and feels like a savage; he has the savage virtues38 and the savage vices39; and the gang is his tribe.
Yet while nothing can be more evident than that certain characteristics of growing boys and girls, both physical and mental, are the result of a direct inheritance from the past, it is equally evident that certain others are not. In certain conspicuous40 traits, our children favor their long-departed ancestors; but in certain others they are even less like them than we. Our anthropoid41 ancestry42 were79 hairy; children are less hairy than adults. We have larger brains and shorter arms than our forebears, but our children have still larger brains, relatively43, and still shorter arms than we. In a dozen different ways, the older a man grows, the more, not the less, apelike does he become; as, for example, in the curve of his back and the great bony ridges44 over his eyes. In these respects, the child looks rather to the future than to the past. The child, indeed, recapitulates45 the history of the race, but only so far as it is some real advantage to him to do so, and never merely for the sake of recapitulating. When Nature cannot utilize47 an ancestral quality here and now, out it goes, to make room for something wholly new.
Certain qualities of youth, then, are an inheritance from the past; they exist because of the men and women that were. Certain others are a prophecy of adult life, and exist because of the men and women who are to be. Most of our youthful characteristics are simultaneously48 of both these sorts. They have persisted from an immemorial past; but80 they have persisted, instead of being lost by the way, because they have proved themselves useful in this present. Thus, for example, we recapitulate46 a gill-slit stage, because we actually did have a fish ancestor; but we use these gill-slits, not to become adult fish, but as a convenient device for building an aortic49 arch such as no fish ever had. We are tailed embryos50 as a step in becoming tailless men; and in the same way, we are boy savages as a stage toward becoming civilized human beings. The savage impulses of a long departed past appear in every modern boy, both because they are an inheritance from that past and because they are a preparation for the boy’s future. We tend to recapitulate only so much of the ancestral experience as we can actually use.
Conversely, what we keep is useful; or else has been useful so very lately that we have not had time to change. Before the days of gunpowder—and how short a while, after all, that was—handling spear and javelin51 was a matter of life and death. Then, as now, boys had the missile-throwing instinct,81 and girls did not. They had it, on the one hand, because their ancestors had been spear-men; but they had it, on the other hand, and equally, and long before they were old enough to fight, in order that they might enjoy the long continued practice that taught them to throw well. Evidently, a spear-fighting people whose boys lacked the throwing instinct, so that they had to be coerced52 into doing their spear practice, would soon go down before a rival group whose boys found spear throwing a spontaneous play. In the same way, the children of girls who did not love dolls and pets and all small and helpless things could never, even under modern conditions, make head against the children of girls who did. All the peoples whose women tended their babies from a sense of duty have long ago gone to the wall.
The woman must tend her babies; therefore the girl loves dolls. The man, to be a member of any human society, whether civilized or savage, must stand by his fellows, follow his leader, act with his associates, be82 loyal to the death. Therefore the boy has the gang-forming instincts. These are, in a real sense, an inheritance from the past, but they are in an equally real sense a gift of the present to the future. Boys and girls alike repeat so much of their common ancestral experience as helps to make them efficient men and women, and no more. If there were no such thing as heredity, if each generation simply sat down and created the next to suit itself, we should still have to make the girls love dolls and the boys form gangs. Without these instincts, neither girls nor boys would become fully53 equipped adults.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
psychology
|
|
| n.心理，心理学，心理状态 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
primitive
|
|
| adj.原始的；简单的；n.原(始)人，原始事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
hind
|
|
| adj.后面的，后部的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
dormant
|
|
| adj.暂停活动的；休眠的；潜伏的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
ripen
|
|
| vt.使成熟；vi.成熟 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
adolescence
|
|
| n.青春期，青少年 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
instinctive
|
|
| adj.(出于)本能的；直觉的；(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
longing
|
|
| n.（for）渴望 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
advent
|
|
| n.(重要事件等的)到来，来临 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
divergences
|
|
| n.分叉( divergence的名词复数 )；分歧；背离；离题 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
backbite
|
|
| v.背后诽谤 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
loyalty
|
|
| n.忠诚，忠心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
hurl
|
|
| vt.猛投，力掷，声叫骂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
transformation
|
|
| n.变化；改造；转变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
specialized
|
|
| adj.专门的，专业化的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地；表面上，似乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
precisely
|
|
| adv.恰好，正好，精确地，细致地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
instinctively
|
|
| adv.本能地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
savage
|
|
| adj.野蛮的；凶恶的，残暴的；n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
civilized
|
|
| a.有教养的，文雅的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
tribal
|
|
| adj.部族的，种族的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
possessed
|
|
| adj.疯狂的；拥有的，占有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
prey
|
|
| n.被掠食者，牺牲者，掠食；v.捕食，掠夺，折磨 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
fascination
|
|
| n.令人着迷的事物，魅力，迷恋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
reverberation
|
|
| 反响； 回响； 反射； 反射物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
doctrine
|
|
| n.教义；主义；学说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
epitome
|
|
| n.典型，梗概 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
prehistoric
|
|
| adj.（有记载的）历史以前的，史前的，古老的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
accurately
|
|
| adv.准确地，精确地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
symbolically
|
|
| ad.象征地，象征性地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
recapitulating
|
|
| v.总结，扼要重述( recapitulate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
varied
|
|
| adj.多样的，多变化的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
clans
|
|
| 宗族( clan的名词复数 )； 氏族； 庞大的家族； 宗派 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
invertebrates
|
|
| n.无脊椎动物( invertebrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
savages
|
|
| 未开化的人，野蛮人( savage的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
illuminating
|
|
| a.富于启发性的，有助阐明的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
essentially
|
|
| adv.本质上，实质上，基本上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
virtues
|
|
| 美德( virtue的名词复数 )； 德行； 优点； 长处 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
vices
|
|
| 缺陷( vice的名词复数 )； 恶习； 不道德行为； 台钳 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
conspicuous
|
|
| adj.明眼的，惹人注目的；炫耀的，摆阔气的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
anthropoid
|
|
| adj.像人类的，类人猿的；n.类人猿；像猿的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
ancestry
|
|
| n.祖先，家世 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
relatively
|
|
| adv.比较...地，相对地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
ridges
|
|
| n.脊( ridge的名词复数 )；山脊；脊状突起；大气层的)高压脊 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
recapitulates
|
|
| n.总结，扼要重述( recapitulate的名词复数 )v.总结，扼要重述( recapitulate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
recapitulate
|
|
| v.节述要旨，择要说明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
utilize
|
|
| vt.使用，利用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
simultaneously
|
|
| adv.同时发生地，同时进行地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
aortic
|
|
| adj.大动脉的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
embryos
|
|
| n.晶胚；胚，胚胎( embryo的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
javelin
|
|
| n.标枪，投枪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
coerced
|
|
| v.迫使做( coerce的过去式和过去分词 )；强迫；（以武力、惩罚、威胁等手段）控制；支配 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
fully
|
|
| adv.完全地，全部地，彻底地；充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |