A description of Anglo-Saxon Britain, however brief, would not be complete without some account of the English language in its earliest and purest form. But it would be impossible within reasonable limits to give anything more than a short general statement of the relation which the old English tongue bears to the kindred Teutonic dialects, and of the main differences which mark it off from our modern simplified and modified speech. All that can be attempted here is such a broad outline as may enable the general reader to grasp the true connexion between modern English and so-called Anglo-Saxon, on the one hand, as well as between Anglo-Saxon itself and the parent Teutonic language on the other. Any full investigation2 of grammatical or etymological3 details would be beyond the scope of this little volume.
The tongue spoken by the English and Saxons at the period of their invasion of Britain was an almost unmixed Low Dutch dialect. Originally derived5, of course, from the primitive6 Aryan language, it had already undergone those changes which are summed up in what is known as Grimm's Law. The principal consonants7 in the old Aryan tongue had been regularly and slightly altered in certain directions; and these alterations9 have been carried still further in the allied10 High German language. Thus the original word for father, which closely resembled the Latin pater, becomes in early English or Anglo-Saxon f?der, and in modern High German vater. So, again, among the numerals, our two, in early English twa, answers to Latin duo and modern High German zwei; while our three, in old English threo, answers to Latin tres, and modern High German drei. So far as these permutations are concerned, Sanscrit, Greek, and Latin may be regarded as most nearly resembling the primitive Aryan speech, and with them the Celtic dialects mainly agree. From these, the English varies one degree, the High German two. The following table represents the nature of such changes approximately for these three groups of languages:—
Greek, Sanscrit, Latin, Celtic p. b. f. t. d. th. k. g. ch.
Gothic, English, Low Dutch f. p. b. th. t. d. ch. k. g.
High German b. f. p. d. th. t. g. ch. k.
In practice, several modifications11 arise; for example, the law is only true for old High German, and that only approximately, but its general truth may be accepted as governing most individual cases.
Judged by this standard, English forms a dialect of the Low Dutch branch of the Aryan language, together with Frisian, modern Dutch, and the Scandinavian tongues. Within the group thus restricted its affinities13 are closest with Frisian and old Dutch, less close with Icelandic and Danish. While the English still lived on the shores of the Baltic, it is probable that their language was perfectly14 intelligible15 to the ancestors of the people who now inhabit Holland, and who then spoke4 very slightly different local dialects. In other words, a single Low Dutch speech then apparently16 prevailed from the mouth of the Elbe to that of the Scheldt, with small local variations; and from this speech the Anglo-Saxon and the modern English have developed in one direction, while the Dutch has developed in another, the Frisian dialect long remaining intermediate between them. Scandinavian ceased, perhaps, to be intelligible to Englishmen at an earlier date, the old Icelandic being already marked off from Anglo-Saxon by strong peculiarities17, while modern Danish differs even more widely from the spoken English of the present day.
The relation of Anglo-Saxon to modern English is that of direct parentage, it might almost be said of absolute identity. The language of Beowulf and of ?lfred is not, as many people still imagine, a different language from our own; it is simply English in its earliest and most unmixed form. What we commonly call Anglo-Saxon, indeed, is more English than what we commonly call English at the present day. The first is truly English, not only in its structure and grammar, but also in the whole of its vocabulary: the second, though also truly English in its structure and grammar, contains a large number of Latin, Greek, and Romance elements in its vocabulary. Nevertheless, no break separates us from the original Low Dutch tongue spoken in the marsh18 lands of Sleswick. The English of Beowulf grows slowly into the English of ?lfred, into the English of Chaucer, into the English of Shakespeare and Milton, and into the English of Macaulay and Tennyson.
Old words drop out from time to time, old grammatical forms die away or become obliterated19, new names and verbs are borrowed, first from the Norman-French at the Conquest, then from the classical Greek and Latin at the Renaissance20; but the continuity of the language remains21 unbroken, and its substance is still essentially22 the same as at the beginning. The Cornish, the Irish, and to some extent the Welsh, have left off speaking their native tongues, and adopted the language of the dominant23 Teuton; but there never was a time when Englishmen left off speaking Anglo-Saxon and took to English, Norman-French, or any other form of speech whatsoever24.
An illustration may serve to render clearer this fundamental and important distinction. If at the present day a body of Englishmen were to settle in China, they might learn and use the Chinese names for many native plants, animals, and manufactured articles; but however many of such words they adopted into their vocabulary, their language would still remain essentially English. A visitor from England would have to learn a number of unfamiliar26 words, but he would not have to learn a new language. If, on the other hand, a body of Frenchmen were to settle in a neighbouring Chinese province, and to adopt exactly the same Chinese words, their language would still remain essentially French. The dialects of the two settlements would contain many words in common, but neither of them would be a Chinese dialect on that account. Just so, English since the Norman Conquest has grafted27 many foreign words upon the native stock; but it still remains at bottom the same language as in the days of Eadgar.
Nevertheless, Anglo-Saxon differs so far in externals from modern English, that it is now necessary to learn it systematically30 with grammar and dictionary, in somewhat the same manner as one would learn a foreign tongue. Most of the words, indeed, are more or less familiar, at least so far as their roots are concerned; but the inflexions of the nouns and verbs are far more complicated than those now in use: and many obsolete31 forms occur even in the vocabulary. On the other hand the idioms closely resemble those still in use; and even where a root has now dropped out of use, its meaning is often immediately suggested by the cognate32 High German word, or by some archaic33 form preserved for us in Chaucer, Shakespeare, or Milton, as well as by occasional survival in the Lowland Scotch34 and other local dialects.
English in its early form was an inflexional language; that is to say, the mutual35 relations of nouns and of verbs were chiefly expressed, not by means of particles, such as of, to, by, and so forth36, but by means of modifications either in the termination or in the body of the root itself. The nouns were declined much as in Greek and Latin; the verbs were conjugated37 in somewhat the same way as in modern French. Every noun had gender38 expressed in its form.
The following examples will give a sufficient idea of the commoner forms of declension in the classical West Saxon of the time of ?lfred. The pronunciation has already been briefly39 explained in the preface.
Sing. Plur.
(1.) Nom. stan (a stone). Nom. stanas.
Gen. stanes. Gen. stana.
Dat. stane. Dat. stanum.
Acc. stan. Acc. stanas.
This is the commonest declension for masculine nouns, and it has fixed40 the normal plural41 for the modern English.
Sing. Plur.
(2.) Nom. fot (a foot). Nom. fet.
Gen. fotes. Gen. fota.
Dat. fet. Dat. fotum.
Acc. fot. Acc. fet.
Hence our modified plurals42, such as feet, teeth, and men.
Sing. Plur.
(3.) Nom. wudu (a wood). Nom. wuda.
Gen. wuda. Gen. wuda.
Dat. wuda. Dat. wudum.
Acc. wudu. Acc. wuda.
All these are for masculine nouns.
The commonest feminine declension is as follows:—
Sing. Plur.
(4.) Nom. gifu (a gift). Nom. gifa.
Gen. gife. Gen. gifena.
Dat. gife. Dat. gifum.
Acc. gife. Acc. gifa.
Less frequent is the modified form:
Sing. Plur.
(5.) Nom. boc (a book). Nom. bec.
Gen. bec. Gen. boca.
Dat. bec. Dat. bocum.
Acc. boc. Acc. bec.
Of neuters there are two principal declensions. The first has the plural in u; the second leaves it unchanged.
Sing. Plur.
(6.) Nom. scip (a ship). Nom. scipu.
Gen. scipes. Gen. scipa.
Dat. scipe. Dat. scipum.
Acc. scip. Acc. scipu.
Sing. Plur.
(7.) Nom. hus (a house). Nom. hus.
Gen. huses. Gen. husa.
Dat. huse. Dat. husum.
Acc. hus. Acc. hus.
Hence our "collective" plurals, such as fish, deer, sheep, and trout44.
There is also a weak declension, much the same for all three genders45, of which the masculine form runs as follows:—
Sing. Plur.
Nom. guma (a man). Nom. guman.
Gen. guman. Gen. gumena.
Dat. guman. Dat. guman.
Acc. guman. Acc. guman.
Adjectives are declined throughout, as in Latin, through all the cases (including an instrumental), numbers, and genders. The demonstrative pronoun or definite article se (the) may stand as an example.
Sing.
Masc. Fem. Neut.
Nom. se, seo, th?t.
Gen. th?s, th?re, th?s.
Dat. tham, th?re, tham.
Acc. thone, tha, th?t.
Inst. thy, th?re, thy.
Plur.
Masc. Fem. Neut.
Nom. tha.
Gen. thara.
Dat. tham.
Acc. tha.
Inst. —
Verbs are conjugated about as fully46 as in Latin. There are two principal forms: strong verbs, which form their preterite by vowel47 modification12, as binde, pret. band; and weak verbs, which form it by the addition of ode or de to the root, as lufige, pret. lufode; hire, pret. hirde. The present and preterite of the first form are as follows:—
Ind. Subj.
Pres. sing. 1. binde. binde.
2. bindest. binde.
3. bindeth. binde.
plur. 1, 2, 3. bindath. binden.
Pret. sing. 1. band. bunde.
2. bunde. bunde.
3. band. bunde.
plur. 1, 2, 3. bundon bunden.
Both the grammatical forms and still more the orthography48 vary much from time to time, from place to place, and even from writer to writer. The forms used in this work are for the most part those employed by West Saxons in the age of ?lfred.
A few examples of the language as written at three periods will enable the reader to form some idea of its relation to the existing type. The first passage cited is from King ?lfred's translation of Orosius; but it consists of the opening lines of a paragraph inserted by the king himself from his own materials, and so affords an excellent illustration of his style in original English prose. The reader is recommended to compare it word for word with the parallel slightly modernised version, bearing in mind the inflexional terminations.
Ohthere s?de his hlaforde, ?lfrede cyninge, th?t he ealra Northmonna northmest bude. He cw?th th?t he bude on th?m lande northweardum with tha West-s?. He s?de theah th?t th?t land sie swithe lang north thonan; ac hit is eall weste, buton on feawum stowum styccem?lum wiciath Finnas, on huntothe on wintra, and on sumera on fiscathe be th?re s?. He s?de th?t he ?t sumum cirre wolde fandian hu longe th?t land northryhte l?ge, oththe hw?ther ?nig monn be northan th?m westenne bude. Tha for he northryhte be th?m lande: let him ealne weg th?t weste land on th?t steorbord, and tha wid-s? on th?t b?cbord thrie dagas. Tha w?s he swa feor north swa tha hw?l-huntan firrest farath.
Othhere said [to] his lord, ?lfred king, that he of all Northmen northmost abode50. He quoth that he abode on the land northward51 against the West Sea. He said, though, that that land was [or extended] much north thence; eke52 it is all waste, but [except that] on few stows [in a few places] piecemeal53 dwelleth Finns, on hunting on winter, and on summer on fishing by the sea. He said that he at some time [on one occasion] would seek how long that land lay northright [due north], or whether any man by north of the waste abode. Then fore28 [fared] he northright, by the land: left all the way that waste land on the starboard of him, and the wide sea on the backboard [port, French babord] three days. Then was he so far north as the whale-hunters furthest fareth.
In this passage it is easy to see that the variations which make it into modern English are for the most part of a very simple kind. Some of the words are absolutely identical, as his, on, he, and, land, or north. Others, though differences of spelling mask the likeness54, are practically the same, as s?, s?de, cw?th, th?t, lang, for which we now write sea, said, quoth, that, long. A few have undergone contraction55 or alteration8, as hlaford, now lord, cyning, now king, and steorbord, now starboard. Stow, a place, is now obsolete, except in local names; styccem?lum, stickmeal, has been Normanised into piecemeal. In other cases new terminations have been substituted for old ones; huntath and fiscath are now replaced by hunting and fishing; while hunta has been superseded56 by hunter. Only six words in the passage have died out wholly: buan, to abide57 (bude); swithe, very; wician, to dwell; cirr, an occasion; fandian, to enquire58 (connected with find); and b?cbord, port, which still survives in French from Norman sources. D?g, day, and ?nig, any, show how existing English has softened59 the final g into a y. But the main difference which separates the modern passage from its ancient prototype is the consistent dropping of the grammatical inflexions in hlaforde, ?lfrede, ealra, feawum, and fandian, where we now say, to his lord, of all, in few, and to enquire.
The next passage, from the old English epic60 of Beowulf, shows the language in another aspect. Here, as in all poetry, archaic forms abound61, and the syntax is intentionally62 involved. It is written in the old alliterative rhythm, described in the next chapter:—
Beowulf mathelode bearn Ecgtheowes;
Hw?t! we the thas s?-lac sunu Healfdenes
Leod Scyldinga lustum brohton,
Tires to tacne, the thu her to-locast.
Ic th?t un-softe ealdre gedigde
Wigge under w?tere, weore genethde
Earfothlice; ?t rihte w?s
Guth getw?fed nymthe mec god scylde.
Beowulf spake, the son of Ecgtheow:
See! We to thee this sea-gift, son of Healfdene,
Prince of the Scyldings, joyfully64 have brought,
For a token of glory, that thou here lookest on.
That I unsoftly, gloriously accomplished65,
In war under water: the work I dared,
With much labour: rightly was
The battle divided, but that a god shielded me.
Or, to translate more prosaically:—
"Beowulf, the son of Ecgtheow, addressed the meeting. See, son of Healfdene, Prince of the Scyldings; we have joyfully brought thee this gift from the sea which thou beholdest, for a proof of our valour. I obtained it with difficulty, gloriously, fighting beneath the waves: I dared the task with great toil66. Evenly was the battle decreed, but that a god afforded me his protection."
In this short passage, many of the words are now obsolete: for example, mathelian, to address an assembly (concionari); lac, a gift; wig63, war; guth, battle; and leod, a prince. Ge-digde, ge-nethde, and ge-tw?fed have the now obsolete particle ge-, which bears much the same sense as in High German. On the other hand, bearn, a bairn; sunu, a son; s?, sea; tacen, a token; w?ter, water; and weorc, work, still survive: as do the verbs to bring, to look, and to shield. Lust25, pleasure, whence lustum, joyfully, has now restricted its meaning in modern English, but retains its original sense in High German.
A few lines from the "Chronicle" under the year 1137, during the reign29 of Stephen, will give an example of Anglo-Saxon in its later and corrupt67 form, caught in the act of passing into Chaucerian English:—
This g?re for the King Stephan ofer s? to Normandi; and ther wes under fangen, forthi th?t hi wenden th?t he sculde ben alsuic alse the eom w?s, and for he hadde get his tresor; ac he todeld it and scatered sotlice. Micel hadde Henri king gadered gold and sylver, and na god ne dide men for his saule tharof. Tha the King Stephan to Englaland com, tha macod he his gadering ?t Oxeneford, and thar he nam the biscop Roger of Sereberi, and Alexander biscop of Lincoln, and the Canceler Roger, hise neves, and dide ?lle in prisun, til hi iafen up hire castles.
This year fared the King Stephen over sea to Normandy; and there he was accepted [received as duke] because that they weened that he should be just as his uncle was, and because he had got his treasure: but he to-dealt [distributed] and scattered68 it sot-like [foolishly]. Muckle had King Henry gathered of gold and silver; and man did no good for his soul thereof. When that King Stephan was come to England, then maked he his gathering69 at Oxford70, and there he took the bishop71 Roger of Salisbury, and Alexander, bishop of Lincoln, and the Chancellor72 Roger, his nephew, and did them all in prison [put them in prison] till they gave up their castles.
The following passage from ?lfric's Life of King Oswold, in the best period of early English prose, may perhaps be intelligible to modern readers by the aid of a few explanatory notes only. Mid73 means with; while with itself still bears only the meaning of against:—
"?fter tham the Augustinus to Englalande becom, w?s sum ?thele cyning, Oswold ge-haten [hight or called], on North-hymbra-lande, ge-lyfed swithe on God. Se ferde [went] on his iugothe [youth] fram his freondum and magum [relations] to Scotlande on s?, and th?r sona wearth ge-fullod [baptised], and his ge-feran [companions] samod the mid him sithedon [journeyed]. Betwux tham wearth of-slagen [off-slain] Eadwine his eam [uncle], North-hymbra cyning, on Crist ge-lyfed, fram Brytta cyninge, Ceadwalla ge-ciged [called, named], and twegen his ?fter-gengan binnan twam gearum [years]; and se Ceadwalla sloh and to sceame tucode tha North-hymbran leode [people] ?fter heora hlafordes fylle, oth th?t [until] Oswold se eadiga his yfelnysse adw?scte [extinguished]. Oswold him com to, and him cenlice [boldly] with feaht mid lytlum werode [troop], ac his geleafa [belief] hine ge-trymde [encouraged], and Crist him ge-fylste [helped] to his feonda [fiends, enemies] slege."
It will be noticed in every case that the syntactical arrangement of the words in the sentences follows as a whole the rule that the governed word precedes the governing, as in Latin or High German, not vice74 versa, as in modern English.
A brief list will show the principal modifications undergone by nouns in the process of modernisation. Stan, stone; snaw, snow; ban, bone. Cr?ft, craft; st?f, staff; b?c, back. Weg, way; d?g, day; n?gel, nail; fugol, fowl75. Gear, year; geong, young. Finger, finger; winter, winter; ford49, ford. ?fen43, even; morgen, morn. Monath, month; heofon, heaven; heafod, head. Fot, foot; toth, tooth; boc, book; freond, friend. Modor, mother; f?der, father; dohtor, daughter. Sunu, son; wudu, wood; caru, care; denu, dene (valley). Scip, ship; cild, child; ceorl, churl76; cynn, kin1; ceald, cold. Wherever a word has not become wholly obsolete, or assumed a new termination, (e.g., gifu, gift; morgen, morn-ing), it usually follows one or other of these analogies.
The changes which the English language, as a whole, has undergone in passing from its earlier to its later form, may best be considered under the two heads of form and matter.
As regards form or structure, the language has been simplified in three separate ways. First, the nouns and adjectives have for the most part lost their inflexions, at least so far as the cases are concerned. Secondly77, the nouns have also lost their gender. And thirdly, the verbs have been simplified in conjugation, weak preterites being often substituted for strong ones, and differential terminations largely lost. On the other hand, the plural of nouns is still distinguished78 from the singular by its termination in s, which is derived from the first declension of Anglo-Saxon nouns, not as is often asserted, from the Norman-French usage. In other words, all plurals have been assimilated to this the commonest model; just as in French they have been assimilated to the final s of the third declension in Latin. A few plurals of the other types still survive, such as men, geese, mice, sheep, deer, oxen, children and (dialectically) peasen. To make up for this loss of inflexions, the language now employs a larger number of particles, and to some extent, of auxiliaries79. Instead of wines, we now say of a friend; instead of wine, we now say to a friend; and instead of winum, we now say to friends. English, in short, has almost ceased to be inflexional and has become analytic80.
As regards matter or vocabulary, the language has lost in certain directions, and gained in others. It has lost many old Teutonic roots, such as wig, war; rice, kingdom; tungol, light; with their derivatives81, wigend, warrior82; rixian, to rule; tungol-witega, astrologer; and so forth. The relative number of such losses to the survivals may be roughly gauged83 from the passages quoted above. On the other hand, the language has gained by the incorporation84 of many Romance words, shortly after the Norman Conquest, such as place, voice, judge, war, and royal. Some of these have entirely85 superseded native old English words. Thus the Norman-French uncle, aunt, cousin, nephew, and niece, have wholly ousted86 their Anglo-Saxon equivalents. In other instances the Romance words have enriched the language with symbols for really new ideas. This is still more strikingly the case with the direct importations from the classical Greek and Latin which began at the period of the Renaissance. Such words usually refer either to abstract conceptions for which the English language had no suitable expression, or to the accurate terminology87 of the advanced sciences. In every-day conversation our vocabulary is almost entirely English; in speaking or writing upon philosophical88 or scientific subjects it is largely intermixed with Romance and Gr?co-Latin elements. On the whole, though it is to be regretted that many strong, vigorous or poetical89 old Teutonic roots should have been allowed to fall into disuse, it may safely be asserted that our gains have far more than outbalanced our losses in this respect.
It must never be forgotten, however, that the whole framework of our language still remains, in every case, purely90 English—that is to say, Anglo-Saxon or Low Dutch—however many foreign elements may happen to enter into its vocabulary. We can frame many sentences without using one word of Romance or classical origin: we cannot frame a single sentence without using words of English origin. The Authorised Version of the Bible, "The Pilgrim's Progress," and such poems as Tennyson's "Dora," consist almost entirely of Teutonic elements. Even when the vocabulary is largely classical, as in Johnson's "Rasselas" and some parts of "Paradise Lost," the grammatical structure, the prepositions, the pronouns, the auxiliary91 verbs, and the connecting particles, are all necessarily and purely English. Two examples will suffice to make this principle perfectly clear. In the first, which is the most familiar quotation92 from Shakespeare, all the words of foreign origin have been printed in italics:—
To be, or not to be,—that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings93 and arrows of outrageous94 fortune; Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And, by opposing, end them? To die,—to sleep,— No more; and, by a sleep, to say we end The heart-ache, and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to,—'tis a consummation Devoutly95 to be wished. To die,—to sleep;— To sleep! perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, When we have shuffled97 off this mortal coil, Must give us pause: there's the respect That makes calamity98 of so long life; For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely, The pangs99 of despised love, the law's delay, The insolence100 of office, and the spurns101 That patient merit of the unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin?
Here, out of 167 words, we find only 28 of foreign origin; and even these are Englished in their terminations or adjuncts. Noble is Norman-French; but the comparative nobler stamps it with the Teutonic mark. Oppose is Latin; but the participle opposing is true English. Devout96 is naturalised by the native adverbial termination, devoutly. Oppressor's and despised take English inflexions. The formative elements, or, not, that, the, in, and, by, we, and the rest, are all English. The only complete sentence which we could frame of wholly Latin words would be an imperative102 standing103 alone, as, "Observe," and even this would be English in form.
On the other hand, we may take the following passage from Mr. Herbert Spencer as a specimen104 of the largely Latinised vocabulary needed for expressing the exact ideas of science or philosophy. Here also borrowed words are printed in italics:—
"The constitution which we assign to this etherial medium, however, like the constitution we assign to solid substance, is necessarily an abstract of the impressions received from tangible105 bodies. The opposition106 to pressure which a tangible body offers to us is not shown in one direction only, but in all directions; and so likewise is its tenacity107. Suppose countless108 lines radiating from its centre on every side, and it resists along each of these lines and coheres109 along each of these lines. Hence the constitution of those ultimate units through the instrumentality of which phenomena110 are interpreted. Be they atoms of ponderable matter or molecules111 of ether, the properties we conceive them to possess are nothing else than these perceptible properties idealised."
In this case, out of 122 words we find no less than 46 are of foreign origin. Though this large proportion sufficiently112 shows the amount of our indebtedness to the classical languages for our abstract or specialised scientific terms, the absolutely indisputable nature of the English substratum remains clearly evident. The tongue which we use to-day is enriched by valuable loan words from many separate sources; but it is still as it has always been, English and nothing else. It is the self-same speech with the tongue of the Sleswick pirates and the West Saxon over-lords.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
kin
|
|
| n.家族，亲属，血缘关系；adj.亲属关系的，同类的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
investigation
|
|
| n.调查，调查研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
etymological
|
|
| adj.语源的，根据语源学的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
derived
|
|
| vi.起源；由来；衍生；导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 )；（从…中）得到获得；源于；（从…中）提取 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
primitive
|
|
| adj.原始的；简单的；n.原(始)人，原始事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
consonants
|
|
| n.辅音，子音( consonant的名词复数 )；辅音字母 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
alteration
|
|
| n.变更，改变；蚀变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
alterations
|
|
| n.改动( alteration的名词复数 )；更改；变化；改变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
allied
|
|
| adj.协约国的；同盟国的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
modifications
|
|
| n.缓和( modification的名词复数 )；限制；更改；改变 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
modification
|
|
| n.修改，改进，缓和，减轻 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
affinities
|
|
| n.密切关系( affinity的名词复数 )；亲近；（生性）喜爱；类同 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
perfectly
|
|
| adv.完美地，无可非议地，彻底地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
intelligible
|
|
| adj.可理解的，明白易懂的，清楚的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地；表面上，似乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
peculiarities
|
|
| n. 特质, 特性, 怪癖, 古怪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
marsh
|
|
| n.沼泽，湿地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
obliterated
|
|
| v.除去( obliterate的过去式和过去分词 )；涂去；擦掉；彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
renaissance
|
|
| n.复活，复兴，文艺复兴 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
essentially
|
|
| adv.本质上，实质上，基本上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
dominant
|
|
| adj.支配的，统治的；占优势的；显性的；n.主因，要素，主要的人(或物)；显性基因 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
whatsoever
|
|
| adv.（用于否定句中以加强语气）任何；pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
lust
|
|
| n.性(淫)欲；渴(欲)望；vi.对…有强烈的欲望 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
unfamiliar
|
|
| adj.陌生的，不熟悉的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
grafted
|
|
| 移植( graft的过去式和过去分词 )； 嫁接； 使（思想、制度等）成为（…的一部份）； 植根 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
fore
|
|
| adv.在前面；adj.先前的；在前部的；n.前部 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
reign
|
|
| n.统治时期，统治，支配，盛行；v.占优势 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
systematically
|
|
| adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
obsolete
|
|
| adj.已废弃的，过时的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
cognate
|
|
| adj.同类的，同源的，同族的；n.同家族的人，同源词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
archaic
|
|
| adj.(语言、词汇等)古代的，已不通用的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
scotch
|
|
| n.伤口，刻痕；苏格兰威士忌酒；v.粉碎，消灭，阻止；adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
mutual
|
|
| adj.相互的，彼此的；共同的，共有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
forth
|
|
| adv.向前；向外，往外 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
conjugated
|
|
| adj.共轭的，成对的v.列出（动词的）变化形式( conjugate的过去式和过去分词 )；结合，联合，熔化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
gender
|
|
| n.（生理上的）性，（名词、代词等的）性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
briefly
|
|
| adv.简单地，简短地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
plural
|
|
| n.复数；复数形式；adj.复数的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
plurals
|
|
| n.复数，复数形式( plural的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
|
43
fen
|
|
| n.沼泽，沼池 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
trout
|
|
| n.鳟鱼；鲑鱼(属) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
genders
|
|
| n.性某些语言的（阳性、阴性和中性，不同的性有不同的词尾等）( gender的名词复数 )；性别；某些语言的（名词、代词和形容词）性的区分 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
fully
|
|
| adv.完全地，全部地，彻底地；充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
vowel
|
|
| n.元音；元音字母 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
orthography
|
|
| n.拼字法，拼字式 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
Ford
|
|
| n.浅滩，水浅可涉处；v.涉水，涉过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
abode
|
|
| n.住处，住所 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
northward
|
|
| adv.向北；n.北方的地区 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
eke
|
|
| v.勉强度日，节约使用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
piecemeal
|
|
| adj.零碎的；n.片，块；adv.逐渐地；v.弄成碎块 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
likeness
|
|
| n.相像，相似（之处） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
contraction
|
|
| n.缩略词，缩写式，害病 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
superseded
|
|
| [医]被代替的，废弃的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
abide
|
|
| vi.遵守；坚持；vt.忍受 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
enquire
|
|
| v.打听，询问；调查，查问 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
softened
|
|
| （使）变软( soften的过去式和过去分词 )； 缓解打击； 缓和； 安慰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
epic
|
|
| n.史诗，叙事诗；adj.史诗般的，壮丽的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
abound
|
|
| vi.大量存在；(in，with)充满，富于 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
intentionally
|
|
| ad.故意地，有意地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
wig
|
|
| n.假发 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
joyfully
|
|
| adv. 喜悦地, 高兴地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
accomplished
|
|
| adj.有才艺的；有造诣的；达到了的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
toil
|
|
| vi.辛劳工作，艰难地行动；n.苦工，难事 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
corrupt
|
|
| v.贿赂，收买；adj.腐败的，贪污的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
scattered
|
|
| adj.分散的，稀疏的；散步的；疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
gathering
|
|
| n.集会，聚会，聚集 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
Oxford
|
|
| n.牛津（英国城市） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
bishop
|
|
| n.主教，（国际象棋）象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
chancellor
|
|
| n.(英)大臣；法官；(德、奥)总理；大学校长 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
mid
|
|
| adj.中央的，中间的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
vice
|
|
| n.坏事；恶习；[pl.]台钳，老虎钳；adj.副的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
fowl
|
|
| n.家禽，鸡，禽肉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
churl
|
|
| n.吝啬之人；粗鄙之人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
secondly
|
|
| adv.第二，其次 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
distinguished
|
|
| adj.卓越的，杰出的，著名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
auxiliaries
|
|
| n.助动词 ( auxiliary的名词复数 )；辅助工，辅助人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
analytic
|
|
| adj.分析的，用分析方法的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
81
derivatives
|
|
| n.衍生性金融商品；派生物，引出物( derivative的名词复数 )；导数 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
82
warrior
|
|
| n.勇士，武士，斗士 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
83
gauged
|
|
| adj.校准的；标准的；量规的；量计的v.（用仪器）测量( gauge的过去式和过去分词 )；估计；计量；划分 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
84
incorporation
|
|
| n.设立，合并，法人组织 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
85
entirely
|
|
| ad.全部地，完整地；完全地，彻底地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
86
ousted
|
|
| 驱逐( oust的过去式和过去分词 )； 革职； 罢黜； 剥夺 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
87
terminology
|
|
| n.术语；专有名词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
88
philosophical
|
|
| adj.哲学家的，哲学上的，达观的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
89
poetical
|
|
| adj.似诗人的；诗一般的；韵文的；富有诗意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
90
purely
|
|
| adv.纯粹地，完全地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
91
auxiliary
|
|
| adj.辅助的，备用的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
92
quotation
|
|
| n.引文，引语，语录；报价，牌价，行情 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
93
slings
|
|
| 抛( sling的第三人称单数 )； 吊挂； 遣送； 押往 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
94
outrageous
|
|
| adj.无理的，令人不能容忍的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
95
devoutly
|
|
| adv.虔诚地，虔敬地，衷心地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
96
devout
|
|
| adj.虔诚的，虔敬的，衷心的 (n.devoutness) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
97
shuffled
|
|
| v.洗（纸牌）( shuffle的过去式和过去分词 )；拖着脚步走；粗心地做；摆脱尘世的烦恼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
98
calamity
|
|
| n.灾害，祸患，不幸事件 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
99
pangs
|
|
| 突然的剧痛( pang的名词复数 )； 悲痛 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
100
insolence
|
|
| n.傲慢；无礼；厚颜；傲慢的态度 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
101
spurns
|
|
| v.一脚踢开，拒绝接受( spurn的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
102
imperative
|
|
| n.命令，需要；规则；祈使语气；adj.强制的；紧急的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
103
standing
|
|
| n.持续，地位；adj.永久的，不动的，直立的，不流动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
104
specimen
|
|
| n.样本，标本 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
105
tangible
|
|
| adj.有形的，可触摸的，确凿的，实际的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
106
opposition
|
|
| n.反对，敌对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
107
tenacity
|
|
| n.坚韧 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
108
countless
|
|
| adj.无数的，多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
109
coheres
|
|
| v.黏合( cohere的第三人称单数 )；联合；结合；（指看法、推理等）前后一致 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
110
phenomena
|
|
| n.现象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
111
molecules
|
|
| 分子( molecule的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
112
sufficiently
|
|
| adv.足够地，充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |