A Burman was brought up before me charged with possessing opium2. A Sergeant3 of Police had met him at a rest-house in the jungle the day before, and had entered into conversation. The man was sickly and told the Sergeant that he was on his way down from the Shan States, where he had gone to trade. But he had caught the prevalent fever, had then lain ill and lost his money. So he was going home again to his village about fifty miles away, where he hoped to recover his health. Meanwhile he took a little opium for the fever, for in the Shan States opium is not contraband4.
"Oh, you have opium?" asked the Sergeant.
"I brought some down with me," the man said, producing it. Then the Sergeant, as in duty bound, arrested him and brought him into Court.
The case was quite clear. The man admitted the opium, urged that he was ill, also that he did not know—neither of which is a defence in law—and I passed the smallest sentence that I thought the High Court would allow to pass without a reprimand. I fined him ten rupees or in default ten days' imprisonment5. Then I went on to other cases and forgot about it. At four o'clock I left the bench and went to my private room to sign papers before leaving Court. There was a pile of them. I signed, the peon pulled away; I signed again, he pulled; and so on till I looked up. There in the doorway6 stood the Sergeant. He seemed embarrassed. He smiled an awkward smile, saluted7, and then stood doubtfully on one foot and the other.
"Well?" I asked, surprised. "What is the matter?"
"Nothing," he replied.
"Then you needn't stay," I said suggestively, and went on signing. He didn't go. He smiled again and swallowed. I signed a dozen sheets or more and then looked up, and there he was, still smiling.
"Well," I asked, "what is the matter? Out with it."
"We are all poor men," he said.
"Who are?" I asked carelessly.
"All we police," he said. "I gave a whole rupee, but the others could give but a penny or twopence each because they are only constables8. We could not afford more. We are poor men, your Honour."
I stopped my signing. "Sergeant," I said, "come here. I don't know what you're talking about. What is the matter?"
"There is a little girl," he answered, coming up to the table. "That's the difficulty."
I held my head between my hands. I had no idea of what he could be talking about. The syncopated method of beginning a conversation which Burmese often use made my head ache. I stared, he stared. At last I said:
"Sergeant, I'm going home," and rose. Then it all came out.
It was the opium smuggler10. He could not pay the fine, for he was penniless. He had no friends this side of fifty miles away, and he had with him a little daughter aged11 ten years or so. This was, of course, the first that I had heard of her, but it seems that she was just outside when her father was being tried, and when she heard he had to go to gaol12 she was in despair. They wept together.
Therefore the Sergeant whose zeal13 had caused the trouble repented14 of his work and took up a collection. In the police-office and among my clerks he got five rupees. That was but half, and they did not know where to get the rest. Then someone had a brilliant idea. "Go," he said to the Sergeant, "ask the magistrate." "Therefore," said the Sergeant, "I came in to your Honour."
"For what?"
"The other five rupees."
I laughed. How could I help it? The audacity15 of the demand, that I, the magistrate, should pay half the fine that I had myself inflicted16!
"Sergeant," I said severely17, "what have you and I to do with offenders18 who break the law? Are we to pay for them? What is the good of your arresting them and my fining them if we afterwards pay their fines for them? We make a mockery of the law and ruin ourselves."
He did not answer.
"You see the point?" I asked.
He did.
"Then I am going home."
The Sergeant saluted. "I didn't suppose your Honour has the money in Court. Shall I come for it or will your Honour send it over?" he replied.
"Send what?"
"The five rupees."
I sent it over.
This story, besides illustrating19 the kindheartedness of the people and their quickness to see the injustice20 of a law and try to remedy it, shows the difficulty Government have in this matter of opium.
Now I do not intend to go into this very controversial subject. I have read the evidence and the Report of the Opium Commission some years ago, and I have my own opinion about both. That I will keep to myself. All I have to say here is that opium in reasonable doses is a most valuable drug—the most valuable we have. It is in fever-haunted districts the best friend of the people. Some of the best fighting men of the Empire take it and demand it. In its time and place it is no more harmful than liquor, and I have no belief in putting the world into an iron case of everlasting21 "Don'ts." People should be made temperate22 by training and judicious23 restriction24 of opportunity, and not made the slaves of laws. I don't believe in slavery of any kind.
But opium can be and is abused, and there is no doubt that amongst the Burmese generally there is a desire that its use be totally prohibited. A general opinion like that should be respected whether it is right or wrong.
There comes the difficulty. Take Burma as a whole and consider it. The vast majority of the inhabitants are Burmese, but in places in Lower Burma there are large colonies of Hindus and Mohammedans. There are, moreover, many Chinese traders and carpenters spread about all over. They are accustomed to use opium, were so accustomed before they came there, would not have come if they could not have got their stimulant25.
Then, again, Burma is bounded on the east by the independent Shan States, where there is a great deal of fever, where opium grows, and the people use it. Beyond these States is China, where opium is grown largely. Moreover, there are in Lower Burma one or two districts where fever is very deadly and opium is used by the Burmans with the consent of public opinion.
Now sum up all these factors, and see how complicated the problem is.
The Burmans generally want opium prohibited. "Very well," says Government; "we will prohibit it for Burmans; but what about the rest of the population? They want it; their public opinion does not forbid it. They are immigrants, and would not have come if they had been unable to get it. Therefore there must be opium shops for them. But Burmans shall not be allowed to buy."
So far so good in appearance. The Burman may not buy from the shop, and doesn't. He buys from a friendly Chinaman, who for a little commission buys the opium at the shop and hands it over outside.
But this trick was discovered, and Government did its best. It allowanced all Chinamen. They could buy so much and no more, just enough for their own use. If they sold to Burmans they had to go without themselves.
That was excellent, only there were two ways round. One was for Chinamen who did not use opium—not all do—to act as honest broker26; the other was smuggling27 from the Shan States. The quantity of opium smuggled28 down from the Shan States cannot be estimated, nor can it be stopped. How can you guard five hundred miles of frontier all mountain and forest, intersected by forest paths? Opium is light, compact, easily concealed29. Government does its best, but it cannot do the impossible.
Therefore the Acts are widely evaded30, which is always a bad thing; but there is a worse effect than this—there is discrimination by nationality.
I do not think there can be anything worse than an Act that says such and such an act is right and proper for people of one nationality but wrong and penal31 for people of another. A Chinaman may walk about and do openly what if a Burman does he goes to gaol for. What difference is there between the natures of the two people to make such a difference? There is none. Therefore the effect of this law, although it be according to the general desire, is to make the Burman feel that he is a child not to be trusted. This is a bad feeling. If opium were totally prohibited in Upper Burma for everybody except Indian troops or officials sent there by Government, and therefore not free to stay away, this feeling would not arise. If local option is to have effect it should be by areas and not races.
The same thing applies to alcohol. An Indian coolie can go and buy some liquor and have a drink with his friends. A Burman may not. At least not of licit liquor. Therefore a great deal of illicit32 liquor is distilled33.
Try to see how demoralising all this is. Take a town like Sagaing, my last head-quarters, which is really only a big village, and note the results. There is a liquor shop where European liquors, beer, and spirits are sold, and there are several shops where native spirits are sold. A European, or half-caste, or Hindu, or Mohammedan of the better classes could go and buy a bottle of Bass34 or of Dyer's ale at the European shop and take it home for dinner. The Burmese magistrates35, inspectors36 of police, and so on could not—legally. My Treasury38 officer, being a Burman, was debarred; his subordinate, a native of India, was not debarred. What happens? Well, I don't know. But I bought a pony39 once from a very respectable and able Burmese Inspector37 of Police, and the first morning I rode him he took me gently but firmly to the back door of the liquor shop. That gave me an idea, but I kept the idea to myself. I have often had ideas of this nature.
Then take the poorer classes. Is it good for one race of people to see another making merry with a glass while it is illegal for them to do so? Does it not create bitterness, to say the least? Does it not perpetuate40 differences that must disappear if self-government is to succeed?
Here, again, if laws are to succeed they must be in accordance with the desires of the people. Only the people at large can stop smuggling. Read the history of how English smuggling was stopped; it was because no one could smuggle9 without being informed on—that is to say, public opinion had turned against them.
But that is not so in Burma. Were prohibition41 of opium or spirits by localities where all were treated alike, you could ask the people to help you to enforce their wish. But for opium and liquor to be sold to some and refused to others is not a local option. No one likes it, and no one will help to stop smuggling. That is human nature.
Government has been and is greatly abused for its opium and liquor policy, but I think if facts are looked at squarely it will be seen that the situation is very difficult. The only way out that I can see is through local self-government. If the scheme that I sketch42 out at the end of this book took form there would be local option eventually, and people will submit to what they themselves enact43, whereas they chafe44 against the same thing when imposed from above. That is human nature, and it is a very valuable trait of human nature. It is the revolt against subjection, and the declaration that the objective of life is to be free. The only morality of any value comes from within; that imposed from without may improve the body, but it enervates45 the soul. Now the body is temporary and the soul eternal.
Here I may end my criticism of the machinery46 of government. Not that any of the other branches of the administration are better than those I have written of. The land laws are, I think, worse, because they are based on imported fixed47 ideas and not on any careful investigation48 of facts and the underlying49 causes of facts. The police administration is bad; the village administration worse than bad. But I do not want to criticise50; I want to establish my point, which is that the unrest in India is a legitimate51 unrest, that it is not factitious or political, but based on very real grievances52 that must grow till they are relieved.
I have picked out these four branches of the administration: the Criminal and Civil Courts, the Villages, and the Opium and Excise53, for specific reasons. The reason I chose the first two is because no one ever seems to have suspected before how bad they were. Everyone has gone on the fixed idea that because the magistrates and judges are honest and the law up to date there can be nothing to complain of in them. The fault must be in the people.
Only as I write I get a letter to this effect from an officer of long experience. He had "never seen anything wrong with the Courts." Therefore I have set out the facts to the best of my ability. I want the reader to see for himself. I don't want him to accept my authority that they are bad; I don't believe in authority. I want him to think over the facts I have laid before him and frame his own judgment54. I think that he will see that the Courts which have been declared impregnable are very vulnerable indeed.
The reason I chose the Village is because it is the unit of self-government.
The reason I chose the Opium and Excise was different. Whereas Government has never been criticised for its Courts and its law, which are bad, it has received unending criticism for its Opium and Excise policy. Yet, mistakes apart, I don't see how it is much to blame. The difficulties are inherent. They are the same in nature as those that beset55 liquor legislation in England. The question has not been solved here; far from it. In fact, it is insoluble by Act; it is only soluble56 by education of the individual. The right and temperate use of alcohol and drugs is a personal, not a State question. Therefore where Government could have been criticised it was not, and where it did its best in great difficulties it was abused. This will give a key to another difficulty in India: Government receives hardly any good and useful criticism from any side. It is abused and praised, but that understanding criticism which is of the greatest value to individuals and Governments is wanting. The Indians are feeling serious unrest, and they cannot diagnose the cause—no one can diagnose himself—so they strike out at random57 against Government measures and officials. They are like a certain party in England who also are unhappy with things as they are, and who express their dissatisfaction at, say, the marriage laws—which were made not by man, but by Churches, whose great supporters were and are women—by smashing the orchid58 house at Kew. It reminds me of Andrew Lang's ghost. What he wanted to say was that the drains were out of order and a danger to all the inhabitants of the castle. But he suffered from aphasia59, and the nearest he could get to an indication of his meaning was driving round and round the castle at midnight in a hearse and four.
Most changes arising in societies are incoherent in the same way, but it must not be supposed that because the expression is irrelevant60 there is no real and serious cause beneath it. When an overboiling kettle spills and scalds the cat who never did the kettle any harm, it is hard luck on the cat, but it is not unnatural61 in the kettle. And it would be dangerous therefore to stop up the spout62. Later on the kettle might explode and damage the cat's master.
The English papers in India want to support Government, which is right; but the best support they could give would be to point out where Government goes wrong and help it to go right. They never do that, because the editors live in towns and know nothing of the country. Moreover, they too suffer from fixed ideas.
It is the same with the criticism the Indian Government gets from England. There are here practically only two parties. One says, "Sit tight on the safety-valve and shoot anyone who comes near you"; and the other says "Give government to the people." Now there is no organised Indian people as yet to give it to.
No Government has ever had so little help from intelligent criticism as the Indian Government; none ever needed it more. No Government in the world is more sincerely desirous of the good of the people it governs; none knows so little how to secure it.
You cannot have any work done efficiently63 unless there is honest and understanding criticism. No sensible person objects to it if it is given sincerely and fairly. But that is not so in India. Considering how unfair most criticism of the Indian Government is, it shows great self-restraint in the consideration it accords to it. And you can't expect Government officials to criticise themselves. It isn't part of their functions and it isn't fair to ask it. Their duty is to carry out the laws and orders they receive. They have neither the time nor the attitude of mind to be always criticising them.
But there ought to be somebody whose function is to investigate the working of government, and to suggest and criticise. In England it used to be done—badly—by Parliament and the papers. Now no one does it: everyone now only seeks "party" advantage. In China there used to be censors64 whose duty it was, I am told, to watch the working of the machine and criticise it. That would be an admirable idea if it could be carried out.
The Government of India should have censors. They should be well paid, and I think their lives would have to be heavily insured. Their reports should not be pigeon-holed, but published.
At present this ill-informed criticism of Government has succeeded in achieving one and is pressing another measure for the alleviation65 of the unrest which can do nothing but harm. The danger is that Government, not knowing the right thing to do and pressed to do something, will accept these measures rather than be accused of ignoring the unrest.
India is lost to us—lost in spirit, and only awaiting the opportunity to be lost in substance. How shall she be regained66?
Government have two ideas. Let us see what these are.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
magistrate
|
|
| n.地方行政官，地方法官，治安官 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
opium
|
|
| n.鸦片；adj.鸦片的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
sergeant
|
|
| n.警官，中士 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
contraband
|
|
| n.违禁品，走私品 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
imprisonment
|
|
| n.关押，监禁，坐牢 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
doorway
|
|
| n.门口，(喻)入门；门路，途径 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
saluted
|
|
| v.欢迎，致敬( salute的过去式和过去分词 )；赞扬，赞颂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
constables
|
|
| n.警察( constable的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
smuggle
|
|
| vt.私运；vi.走私 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
smuggler
|
|
| n.走私者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
aged
|
|
| adj.年老的，陈年的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
gaol
|
|
| n.(jail)监狱；(不加冠词)监禁；vt.使…坐牢 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
zeal
|
|
| n.热心，热情，热忱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
repented
|
|
| 对（自己的所为）感到懊悔或忏悔( repent的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
audacity
|
|
| n.大胆，卤莽，无礼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
inflicted
|
|
| 把…强加给，使承受，遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
severely
|
|
| adv.严格地；严厉地；非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
offenders
|
|
| n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 )；犯规者；罪犯；妨害…的人（或事物） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
illustrating
|
|
| 给…加插图( illustrate的现在分词 )； 说明； 表明； （用示例、图画等）说明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
injustice
|
|
| n.非正义，不公正，不公平，侵犯（别人的）权利 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
everlasting
|
|
| adj.永恒的，持久的，无止境的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
temperate
|
|
| adj.温和的，温带的，自我克制的，不过分的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
judicious
|
|
| adj.明智的，明断的，能作出明智决定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
restriction
|
|
| n.限制，约束 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
stimulant
|
|
| n.刺激物，兴奋剂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
broker
|
|
| n.中间人，经纪人；v.作为中间人来安排 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
smuggling
|
|
| n.走私 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
smuggled
|
|
| 水货 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
concealed
|
|
| a.隐藏的，隐蔽的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
evaded
|
|
| 逃避( evade的过去式和过去分词 )； 避开； 回避； 想不出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
penal
|
|
| adj.刑罚的；刑法上的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
illicit
|
|
| adj.非法的，禁止的，不正当的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
distilled
|
|
| adj.由蒸馏得来的v.蒸馏( distil的过去式和过去分词 )；从…提取精华 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
bass
|
|
| n.男低音(歌手)；低音乐器；低音大提琴 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
magistrates
|
|
| 地方法官，治安官( magistrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
inspectors
|
|
| n.检查员( inspector的名词复数 )；（英国公共汽车或火车上的）查票员；（警察）巡官；检阅官 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
inspector
|
|
| n.检查员，监察员，视察员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
treasury
|
|
| n.宝库；国库，金库；文库 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
pony
|
|
| adj.小型的；n.小马 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
perpetuate
|
|
| v.使永存，使永记不忘 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
prohibition
|
|
| n.禁止；禁令，禁律 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
sketch
|
|
| n.草图；梗概；素描；v.素描；概述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
enact
|
|
| vt.制定(法律)；上演，扮演 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
chafe
|
|
| v.擦伤；冲洗；惹怒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
enervates
|
|
| v.使衰弱，使失去活力( enervate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
machinery
|
|
| n.(总称)机械，机器；机构 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
fixed
|
|
| adj.固定的，不变的，准备好的；(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
investigation
|
|
| n.调查，调查研究 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
underlying
|
|
| adj.在下面的，含蓄的，潜在的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
criticise
|
|
| v.批评，评论；非难 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
legitimate
|
|
| adj.合法的，合理的，合乎逻辑的；v.使合法 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
grievances
|
|
| n.委屈( grievance的名词复数 )；苦衷；不满；牢骚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
excise
|
|
| n.(国产)货物税；vt.切除，删去 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
judgment
|
|
| n.审判；判断力，识别力，看法，意见 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
beset
|
|
| v.镶嵌；困扰，包围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
soluble
|
|
| adj.可溶的；可以解决的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
random
|
|
| adj.随机的；任意的；n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
orchid
|
|
| n.兰花，淡紫色 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
aphasia
|
|
| n.失语症 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
irrelevant
|
|
| adj.不恰当的，无关系的，不相干的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
unnatural
|
|
| adj.不自然的；反常的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
spout
|
|
| v.喷出，涌出；滔滔不绝地讲；n.喷管；水柱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
efficiently
|
|
| adv.高效率地，有能力地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
censors
|
|
| 删剪（书籍、电影等中被认为犯忌、违反道德或政治上危险的内容）( censor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
alleviation
|
|
| n. 减轻，缓和，解痛物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
regained
|
|
| 复得( regain的过去式和过去分词 )； 赢回； 重回； 复至某地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |