The men who live in democracies are too fluctuating for a certain number of them ever to succeed in laying down a code of good breeding, and in forcing people to follow it. Every man therefore behaves after his own fashion, and there is always a certain incoherence in the manners of such times, because they are moulded upon the feelings and notions of each individual, rather than upon an ideal model proposed for general imitation. This, however, is much more perceptible at the time when an aristocracy has just been overthrown9 than after it has long been destroyed. New political institutions and new social elements then bring to the same places of resort, and frequently compel to live in common, men whose education and habits are still amazingly dissimilar, and this renders the motley composition of society peculiarly visible. The existence of a former strict code of good breeding is still remembered, but what it contained or where it is to be found is already forgotten. Men have lost the common law of manners, and they have not yet made up their minds to do without it; but everyone endeavors to make to himself some sort of arbitrary and variable rule, from the remnant of former usages; so that manners have neither the regularity10 and the dignity which they often display amongst aristocratic nations, nor the simplicity11 and freedom which they sometimes assume in democracies; they are at once constrained12 and without constraint13.
This, however, is not the normal state of things. When the equality of conditions is long established and complete, as all men entertain nearly the same notions and do nearly the same things, they do not require to agree or to copy from one another in order to speak or act in the same manner: their manners are constantly characterized by a number of lesser14 diversities, but not by any great differences. They are never perfectly15 alike, because they do not copy from the same pattern; they are never very unlike, because their social condition is the same. At first sight a traveller would observe that the manners of all the Americans are exactly similar; it is only upon close examination that the peculiarities16 in which they differ may be detected.
The English make game of the manners of the Americans; but it is singular that most of the writers who have drawn17 these ludicrous delineations belonged themselves to the middle classes in England, to whom the same delineations are exceedingly applicable: so that these pitiless censors18 for the most part furnish an example of the very thing they blame in the United States; they do not perceive that they are deriding19 themselves, to the great amusement of the aristocracy of their own country.
Nothing is more prejudicial to democracy than its outward forms of behavior: many men would willingly endure its vices20, who cannot support its manners. I cannot, however, admit that there is nothing commendable21 in the manners of a democratic people. Amongst aristocratic nations, all who live within reach of the first class in society commonly strain to be like it, which gives rise to ridiculous and insipid22 imitations. As a democratic people does not possess any models of high breeding, at least it escapes the daily necessity of seeing wretched copies of them. In democracies manners are never so refined as amongst aristocratic nations, but on the other hand they are never so coarse. Neither the coarse oaths of the populace, nor the elegant and choice expressions of the nobility are to be heard there: the manners of such a people are often vulgar, but they are neither brutal23 nor mean. I have already observed that in democracies no such thing as a regular code of good breeding can be laid down; this has some inconveniences and some advantages. In aristocracies the rules of propriety24 impose the same demeanor25 on everyone; they make all the members of the same class appear alike, in spite of their private inclinations26; they adorn27 and they conceal28 the natural man. Amongst a democratic people manners are neither so tutored nor so uniform, but they are frequently more sincere. They form, as it were, a light and loosely woven veil, through which the real feelings and private opinions of each individual are easily discernible. The form and the substance of human actions often, therefore, stand in closer relation; and if the great picture of human life be less embellished30, it is more true. Thus it may be said, in one sense, that the effect of democracy is not exactly to give men any particular manners, but to prevent them from having manners at all.
The feelings, the passions, the virtues32, and the vices of an aristocracy may sometimes reappear in a democracy, but not its manners; they are lost, and vanish forever, as soon as the democratic revolution is completed. It would seem that nothing is more lasting33 than the manners of an aristocratic class, for they are preserved by that class for some time after it has lost its wealth and its power—nor so fleeting34, for no sooner have they disappeared than not a trace of them is to be found; and it is scarcely possible to say what they have been as soon as they have ceased to be. A change in the state of society works this miracle, and a few generations suffice to consummate35 it. The principal characteristics of aristocracy are handed down by history after an aristocracy is destroyed, but the light and exquisite36 touches of manners are effaced37 from men's memories almost immediately after its fall. Men can no longer conceive what these manners were when they have ceased to witness them; they are gone, and their departure was unseen, unfelt; for in order to feel that refined enjoyment which is derived38 from choice and distinguished39 manners, habit and education must have prepared the heart, and the taste for them is lost almost as easily as the practice of them. Thus not only a democratic people cannot have aristocratic manners, but they neither comprehend nor desire them; and as they never have thought of them, it is to their minds as if such things had never been. Too much importance should not be attached to this loss, but it may well be regretted.
I am aware that it has not unfrequently happened that the same men have had very high-bred manners and very low-born feelings: the interior of courts has sufficiently40 shown what imposing41 externals may conceal the meanest hearts. But though the manners of aristocracy did not constitute virtue31, they sometimes embellish29 virtue itself. It was no ordinary sight to see a numerous and powerful class of men, whose every outward action seemed constantly to be dictated42 by a natural elevation43 of thought and feeling, by delicacy44 and regularity of taste, and by urbanity of manners. Those manners threw a pleasing illusory charm over human nature; and though the picture was often a false one, it could not be viewed without a noble satisfaction.
点击收听单词发音
1 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 amass | |
vt.积累,积聚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 haughty | |
adj.傲慢的,高傲的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 disdain | |
n.鄙视,轻视;v.轻视,鄙视,不屑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 devoid | |
adj.全无的,缺乏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 engrossing | |
adj.使人全神贯注的,引人入胜的v.使全神贯注( engross的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 arrogance | |
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 overthrown | |
adj. 打翻的,推倒的,倾覆的 动词overthrow的过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 simplicity | |
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 constraint | |
n.(on)约束,限制;限制(或约束)性的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 peculiarities | |
n. 特质, 特性, 怪癖, 古怪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 censors | |
删剪(书籍、电影等中被认为犯忌、违反道德或政治上危险的内容)( censor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 deriding | |
v.取笑,嘲笑( deride的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 commendable | |
adj.值得称赞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 insipid | |
adj.无味的,枯燥乏味的,单调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 propriety | |
n.正当行为;正当;适当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 demeanor | |
n.行为;风度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 inclinations | |
倾向( inclination的名词复数 ); 倾斜; 爱好; 斜坡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 adorn | |
vt.使美化,装饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 embellish | |
v.装饰,布置;给…添加细节,润饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 embellished | |
v.美化( embellish的过去式和过去分词 );装饰;修饰;润色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 lasting | |
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 fleeting | |
adj.短暂的,飞逝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 consummate | |
adj.完美的;v.成婚;使完美 [反]baffle | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 exquisite | |
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 effaced | |
v.擦掉( efface的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;超越;使黯然失色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 dictated | |
v.大声讲或读( dictate的过去式和过去分词 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 elevation | |
n.高度;海拔;高地;上升;提高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 delicacy | |
n.精致,细微,微妙,精良;美味,佳肴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |