I do not propose to engage in a contest with the protectionists; but rather to instil1 a principle into the minds of those who hesitate because they sincerely doubt.
I am not one of those who say that Protection is founded on men's interests. I am of opinion rather that it is founded on errors, or, if you will, upon incomplete truths. Too many people fear liberty, to permit us to conclude that their apprehensions2 are not sincerely felt.
It is perhaps aiming too high, but my wish is, I confess, that this little work should become, as it were, the Manual of those whose business it is to pronounce between the two principles. Where men have not been long accustomed and familiarized to the doctrine3 of liberty, the sophisms of protection, in one shape or another, are constantly coming back upon them. In order to disabuse4 them of such errors when they recur5, a long process of analysis becomes necessary; and every one has not the time required for such a process—legislators less than others. This is my reason for endeavouring to present the analysis and its results cut and dry.
But it may be asked, Are the benefits of liberty so hidden as to be discovered only by Economists6 by profession?
* The first series of the Sophismes économiques appeared in
the end of 1845; the second series in 1848.—Editor.
We must confess that our adversaries7 have a marked advantage over us in the discussion. In very few words they can announce a half-truth; and in order to demonstrate that it is incomplete, we are obliged to have recourse to long and dry dissertations8.
This arises from the nature of things. Protection concentrates on one point the good which it produces, while the evils which it inflicts9 are spread over the masses. The one is visible to the naked eye; the other only to the eye of the mind. In the case of liberty, it is just the reverse.
In the treatment of almost all economic questions, we find it to be so.
You say, Here is a machine which has turned thirty workmen into the street.
Or, Here is a spendthrift who encourages every branch of industry.
Or, The conquest of Algeria has doubled the trade of Marseilles.
Or, The budget secures subsistence for a hundred thousand families.
You are understood at once and by all. Your propositions are in themselves clear, simple, and true. What are your deductions10 from them?
And your theory has all the more success that you are in a situation to support it by a reference to undoubted facts.
On our side, we must decline to confine our attention to the cause, and its direct and immediate13 effect. We know that this very effect in its turn becomes a cause. To judge correctly of a measure, then, we must trace it through the whole chain of results to its definitive14 effect. In other words, we are forced to reason upon it.
But then clamour gets up: You are theorists, metaphysicians, idealists, utopian dreamers, doctrinaires; and all the prejudices of the popular mind are roused against us.
What, under such circumstances, are we to do? We can only invoke15 the patience and good sense of the reader, and set our deductions, if we can, in a light so clear, that truth and error must show themselves plainly, openly, and without disguise,—and that the victory, once gained, may remain on the side of restriction16, or on that of freedom.
And here I must set down an essential observation.
Some extracts from this little volume have already appeared in the Journal des Economistes.
In a critique, in other respects very favourable17, from the pen of M. le Vicomte de Romanet, he supposes that I demand the suppression of customs. He is mistaken. I demand the suppression of the protectionist regime. We don't refuse taxes to the Government, but we desire, if possible, to dissuade18 the governed from taxing one another. Napoleon said that "the customhouse should not be made an instrument of revenue, but a means of protecting industry." We maintain the contrary, and we contend that the customhouse ought not to become in the hands of the working classes an instrument of reciprocal rapine, but that it may be used as an instrument of revenue as legitimately19 as any other. So far are we—or, to speak only for myself, so far am I—from demanding the suppression of customs, that I see in that branch of revenue our future anchor of safety. I believe our resources are capable of yielding to the Treasury20 immense returns; and to speak plainly, I must add, that, seeing how slow is the spread of sound economic doctrines21, and so rapid the increase of our budgets, I am disposed to count more upon the necessities of the Treasury than on the force of enlightened opinion for furthering the cause of commercial reform.
You ask me, then, What is your conclusion? and I reply, that here there is no need to arrive at a conclusion. I combat sophisms; that is all.
But you rejoin, that it is not enough to pull down—it is also necessary to build up. True; but to destroy an error, is to build up the truth which stands opposed to it.
After all, I have no repugnance22 to declare what my wishes are. I desire to see public opinion led to sanction a law of customs conceived nearly in these terms:—
Articles of primary necessity to pay a duty, ad valorem, of 5 per cent.
Articles of convenience, 10 per cent.
Articles of luxury, 15 to 20 per cent.
These distinctions, I am aware, belong to an order of ideas which are quite foreign to Political Economy strictly23 so called, and I am far from thinking them as just and useful as they are commonly supposed to be. But this subject does not fall within the compass of my present design.
点击收听单词发音
1 instil | |
v.逐渐灌输 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 apprehensions | |
疑惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 disabuse | |
v.解惑;矫正 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 recur | |
vi.复发,重现,再发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 adversaries | |
n.对手,敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 dissertations | |
专题论文,学位论文( dissertation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 inflicts | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 deductions | |
扣除( deduction的名词复数 ); 结论; 扣除的量; 推演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 taxation | |
n.征税,税收,税金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 invoke | |
v.求助于(神、法律);恳求,乞求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 restriction | |
n.限制,约束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 dissuade | |
v.劝阻,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 legitimately | |
ad.合法地;正当地,合理地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 repugnance | |
n.嫌恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |