"Assuredly," said M. Gauthier de Rumilly, on a recent occasion, "no one wishes to resuscitate8 the antiquated9 theories of the balance of trade." Very right, Monsieur Gauthier, but please to remember that it is not enough to give a passing slap to error, and immediately afterwards, and for two hours together, reason as if that error were truth.
Let me speak of M. Lestiboudois. Here we have a consistent reasoner, a logical disputant. There is nothing in his conclusions which is not to be found in his premises10. He asks nothing in practice, but what he justifies11 in theory. His principle may be false; that is open to question. But, at any rate, he has a principle. He believes, and he proclaims it aloud, that if France gives ten, in order to receive fifteen, she loses five; and it follows, of course, that he supports laws which are in keeping with this view of the subject "The important thing to attend to," he says, "is that the amount of our importations goes on augmenting12, and exceeds the amount of our exportations—that is to say, France every year purchases more foreign products, and sells less of her own. Figures prove this. What do we see? In 1842, imports exceeded exports by 200 millions. These facts appear to prove in the clearest manner that national industry is not sufficiently13 protected, that we depend upon foreign labour for our supplies, that the competition of our rivals oppresses our industry. The present law appears to me to recognise the fact, which is not true according to the economists14, that when we purchase we necessarily sell a corresponding amount of commodities. It is evident that we can purchase, not with our usual products, not with our revenue, not with the results of permanent labour, but with our capital, with products which have been accumulated and stored up, those intended for reproduction—that is to say, that we may expend16, that we may dissipate, the proceeds of anterior17 economies, that we may impoverish18 ourselves, that we may proceed on the road to ruin, and consume entirely19 the national capital. This is exactly what we are doing. Every year we give away 200 millions of francs to the foreigner."
Well, here is a man with whom we can come to an understanding. There is no hypocrisy20 in this language. The doctrine of the balance of trade is openly avowed21. France imports 200 millions more than she exports. Then we lose 200 millions a year. And what is the remedy? To place restrictions22 on importation. The conclusion is unexceptionable.
It is with M. Lestiboudois, then, that we must deal, for how can we argue with M. Gauthier? If you tell him that the balance of trade is an error, he replies that that was what he laid down at the beginning. If you say that the balance of trade is a truth, he will reply that that is what he proves in his conclusions.
The economist15 school will blame me, no doubt, for arguing with M. Lestiboudois. To attack the balance of trade, it will be said, is to fight with a windmill.
But take care. The doctrine of the balance of trade is neither so antiquated, nor so sick, nor so dead as M. Gauthier would represent it, for the entire Chamber23—M. Gauthier himself included—has recognised by its votes the theory of M. Lestiboudois.
I shall not fatigue24 the reader by proceeding25 to probe that theory, but content myself with subjecting it to the test of facts.
We are constantly told that our principles do not hold good, except in theory. But tell me, gentlemen, if you regard the books of merchants as holding good in practice? It appears to me that if there is anything in the world which should have practical authority, when the question regards profit and loss, it is commercial accounts. Have all the merchants in the world come to an understanding for centuries to keep their books in such a way as to represent profits as losses, and losses as profits? It may be so, but I would much rather come to the conclusion that M. Lestiboudois is a bad economist.
Now, a merchant of my acquaintance having had two transactions, the results of which were very different, I felt curious to compare the books of the counting-house with the books of the Customhouse, as interpreted by M. Lestiboudois to the satisfaction of our six hundred legislators.
M. T. despatched a ship from Havre to the United States, with a cargo26 of French goods, chiefly those known as articles de Paris, amounting to 200,000 francs. This was the figure declared at the Customhouse. When the cargo arrived at New Orleans it was charged with 10 per cent, freight and 30 per cent, duty, making a total of 280,000 francs. It was sold with 20 per cent, profit, or 40,000 francs, and produced a total of 320,000 francs, which the consignee27 invested in cottons. These cottons had still for freight, insurance, commission, etc., to bear a cost of 10 per cent. so that when the new cargo arrived at Havre it had cost 352,000 francs, which was the figure entered in the Customhouse books. Finally M. T. realized upon this return cargo 20 per cent, profit, or 70,400 francs; in other words, the cottons were sold for 422,400 francs.
If M. Lestiboudois desires it, I shall send him an extract from the books of M. T. He will there see at the credit of the profit and loss account—that is to say, as profits—two entries, one of 40,000, another of 70,400 francs, and M. T. is very sure that his accounts are accurate.
And yet, what do the Customhouse books tell M. Lestiboudois regarding this transaction? They tell him simply that France exported 200,000 francs' worth, and imported to the extent of 352,000 francs; whence the honourable28 deputy concludes "that she had expended29, and dissipated the profits of her anterior economies, that she is impoverishing30 herself that she is on the high road to ruin, and has given away to the foreigner 152,000 francs of her capital."
Some time afterwards, M. T. despatched another vessel31 with a cargo also of the value of 200,000 francs, composed of the products of our native industry. This unfortunate ship was lost in a gale32 of wind after leaving the harbour, and all M. T. had to do was to make two short entries in his books, to this effect:—
"Sundry33 goods debtors34 to X, 200,000 francs, for purchases of different commodities despatched by the ship N.
"Profit and loss debtors to sundry goods, 200,000 francs, in consequence of definitive35 and total loss of the cargo."
At the same time, the Customhouse books bore an entry of 200.000 francs in the list of exportations; and as there was no corresponding entry to make in the list of importations, it follows that M. Lestiboudois and the Chamber will see in this shipwreck36 a clear and net profit for France of 200,000 francs.
There is still another inference to be deduced from this, which is, that according to the theory of the balance of trade, France has a very simple means of doubling her capital at any moment. It is enough to pass them through the Customhouse, and then pitch them into the sea. In this case the exports will represent the amount of her capital, the imports will be nil37, and even impossible, and we shall gain all that the sea swallows up.
This is a joke, the protectionists will say. It is impossible' we could give utterance38 to such absurdities39. You do give utterance to them, however, and, what is more, you act upon them, and impose them on your fellow-citizens to the utmost of your power.
The truth is, it would be necessary to take the balance of trade backwards40 [au rebours], and calculate the national profits from foreign trade by the excess of imports over exports. This excess, after deducting41 costs, constitutes the real profit. But this theory, which is true, leads directly to free trade. I make you a present of it, gentlemen, as I do of all the theories in the preceding chapters. Exaggerate it as much as you please—it has nothing to fear from that test. Suppose, if that amuses you, that the foreigner inundates42 us with all sorts of useful commodities without asking anything in return, that our imports are infinite and exports nil, I defy you to prove to me that we should be poorer on that account.
点击收听单词发音
1 adversaries | |
n.对手,敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 relegated | |
v.使降级( relegate的过去式和过去分词 );使降职;转移;把…归类 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 paramount | |
a.最重要的,最高权力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 resuscitate | |
v.使复活,使苏醒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 antiquated | |
adj.陈旧的,过时的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 premises | |
n.建筑物,房屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 justifies | |
证明…有理( justify的第三人称单数 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 augmenting | |
使扩张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 expend | |
vt.花费,消费,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 anterior | |
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 impoverish | |
vt.使穷困,使贫困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 avowed | |
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 fatigue | |
n.疲劳,劳累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 cargo | |
n.(一只船或一架飞机运载的)货物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 consignee | |
n.受托者,收件人,代销人;承销人;收货人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 honourable | |
adj.可敬的;荣誉的,光荣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 impoverishing | |
v.使(某人)贫穷( impoverish的现在分词 );使(某物)贫瘠或恶化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 gale | |
n.大风,强风,一阵闹声(尤指笑声等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 sundry | |
adj.各式各样的,种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 debtors | |
n.债务人,借方( debtor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 shipwreck | |
n.船舶失事,海难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 nil | |
n.无,全无,零 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 utterance | |
n.用言语表达,话语,言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 absurdities | |
n.极端无理性( absurdity的名词复数 );荒谬;谬论;荒谬的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 backwards | |
adv.往回地,向原处,倒,相反,前后倒置地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 deducting | |
v.扣除,减去( deduct的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 inundates | |
v.淹没( inundate的第三人称单数 );(洪水般地)涌来;充满;给予或交予(太多事物)使难以应付 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |