You enter the legislative2 precincts. The subject of debate is whether the law should prohibit international exchanges, or proclaim freedom.
A deputy rises, and says:
If you tolerate these exchanges, the foreigner will inundate3 you with his products: England with her textile fabrics4, Belgium with coals, Spain with wools, Italy with silks, Switzerland with cattle, Sweden with iron, Prussia with corn; so that home industry will no longer be possible.
Another replies:
If you prohibit international exchanges, the various bounties5 which nature has lavished6 on different climates will be for you as if they did not exist. You cannot participate in the mechanical skill of the English, in the wealth of the Belgian mines, in the fertility of the Polish soil, in the luxuriance of the Swiss pastures, in the cheapness of Spanish labour, in the warmth of the Italian climate; and you must obtain from a refractory7 and misdirected production those commodities which, through exchange, would have been furnished to you by an easy production.
Assuredly, one of these deputies must be wrong. But which? We must take care to make no mistake on the subject; for this is not a matter of abstract opinion merely. You have to choose between two roads, and one of them leads necessarily to poverty.
This axiom, which is so much in fashion nowadays, not only countenances9 indolence, but ministers to ambition.
If the theory of prohibition10 comes to prevail, or if the doctrine11 of free trade comes to triumph, one brief enactment12 will constitute our whole economic code. In the first case, the law will proclaim that all exchanges with foreign countries are prohibited; in the second, that all exchanges with foreign countries are free; and many grand and distinguished13 personages will thereby14 lose their importance.
But if exchange does not possess a character which is peculiar15 to it,—if it is not governed by any natural law,—if, capriciously, it be sometimes useful and sometimes detrimental,—if it does not find its motive16 force in the good which it accomplishes, its limit in the good which it ceases to accomplish,—if its consequences cannot be estimated by those who effect exchanges;—in a word, if there be no absolute principles, then we must proceed to weigh, balance, and regulate transactions, we must equalize the conditions of labour, and try to find out the average rate of profits—a colossal17 task, well deserving the large emoluments18 and powerful influence awarded to those who undertake it.
On entering Paris, which I had come to visit, I said to myself, Here are a million of human beings, who would all die in a short time if provisions of every kind ceased to flow towards this great metropolis19. Imagination is baffled when it tries to appreciate the vast multiplicity of commodities which must enter to-morrow through the barriers in order to preserve the inhabitants from falling a prey20 to the convulsions of famine, rebellion, and pillage21. And yet all sleep at this moment, and their peaceful slumbers22 are not disturbed for a single instant by the prospect23 of such a frightful24 catastrophe25. On the other hand, eighty departments have been labouring to-day, without concert, without any mutual26 understanding, for the provisioning of Paris. How does each succeeding day bring what is wanted, nothing more, nothing less, to so gigantic a market? What, then, is the ingenious and secret power which governs the astonishing regularity27 of movements so complicated, a regularity in which everybody has implicit28 faith, although happiness and life itself are at stake? That power is an absolute principle, the principle of freedom in transactions. We have faith in that inward light which Providence29 has placed in the heart of all men, and to which He has confided30 the preservation31 and indefinite amelioration of our species, namely, a regard to personal interest—since we must give it its right name—a principle so active, so vigilant32, so foreseeing, when it is free in its action. In what situation, I would ask, would the inhabitants of Paris be, if a minister should take it into his head to substitute for this power the combinations of his own genius, however superior we might suppose them to be—if he thought to subject to his supreme33 direction this prodigious34 mechanism35, to hold the springs of it in his hands, to decide by whom, or in what manner, or on what conditions, everything needed should be produced, transported, exchanged, and consumed? Truly, there may be much suffering within the walls of Paris—poverty, despair, perhaps starvation, causing more tears to flow than ardent36 charity is able to dry up; but I affirm that it is probable, nay37, that it is certain, that the arbitrary intervention38 of government would multiply infinitely39 those sufferings, and spread over all our fellow-citizens those evils which at present affect only a small number of them.
This faith, then, which we repose40 in a principle, when the question relates only to our home transactions, why should we not retain, when the same principle is applied41 to our international transactions, which are undoubtedly42 less numerous, less delicate, and less complicated? And if it is not necessary that the prefecture should regulate our Parisian industries, weigh our chances, balance our profits and losses, see that our circulating medium is not exhausted43, and equalize the conditions of our home labour, why should it be necessary that the Customhouse, departing from its fiscal44 duties, should pretend to exercise a protective action over our external commerce?
点击收听单词发音
1 incorrigible | |
adj.难以纠正的,屡教不改的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 inundate | |
vt.淹没,泛滥,压倒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fabrics | |
织物( fabric的名词复数 ); 布; 构造; (建筑物的)结构(如墙、地面、屋顶):质地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 bounties | |
(由政府提供的)奖金( bounty的名词复数 ); 赏金; 慷慨; 大方 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 lavished | |
v.过分给予,滥施( lavish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 refractory | |
adj.倔强的,难驾驭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 dilemma | |
n.困境,进退两难的局面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 countenances | |
n.面容( countenance的名词复数 );表情;镇静;道义支持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 enactment | |
n.演出,担任…角色;制订,通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 colossal | |
adj.异常的,庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 emoluments | |
n.报酬,薪水( emolument的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 metropolis | |
n.首府;大城市 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 prey | |
n.被掠食者,牺牲者,掠食;v.捕食,掠夺,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 pillage | |
v.抢劫;掠夺;n.抢劫,掠夺;掠夺物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 slumbers | |
睡眠,安眠( slumber的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 catastrophe | |
n.大灾难,大祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 regularity | |
n.规律性,规则性;匀称,整齐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 implicit | |
a.暗示的,含蓄的,不明晰的,绝对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 confided | |
v.吐露(秘密,心事等)( confide的过去式和过去分词 );(向某人)吐露(隐私、秘密等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 preservation | |
n.保护,维护,保存,保留,保持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 prodigious | |
adj.惊人的,奇妙的;异常的;巨大的;庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 ardent | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 nay | |
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 infinitely | |
adv.无限地,无穷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 exhausted | |
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |