What is the meaning of anarchical competition? I really don’t know. What could we substitute for it? I am equally ignorant.
I hear people, indeed, calling out Organization! Association! What does that mean? Let us come to an understanding, once for all. I desire to know what sort of authority these writers intend to exercise over me, and all other living men; for I acknowledge only one species of authority, that of reason, if indeed they have it on their side. Is it their wish then to deprive me of the right of exercising my judgment4 on what concerns my own subsistence? Is their object to take from me the power of comparing the services which I render with those which I receive? Do they mean that I should act under the influence of restraint, exerted over me by them and not by my own intelligence? If they leave me my liberty, Competition remains5. If they deprive me of freedom, I am their slave. Association will be free and voluntary, they say. Be it so. But then each group of associates will, as regards all other groups, be just what individuals now are in relation to each other, and we shall still have Competition. The association will be integral. A good joke truly. What! Anarchical Competition is now desolating6 society, and we must wait for a remedy, until, by dint7 of your persuasion8, all the nations of the earth—Frenchmen, Englishmen, Chinese, Japanese, Caffres, Hottentots, Laplanders, Cossacks, Patagonians—make up their minds to unite in one of the forms of association which you have devised? Why, this is just to avow9 that competition is indestructible; and will you venture to say that a phenomenon which [p289] is indestructible, and consequently providential, can be mischievous10?
After all, what is Competition? Is it a thing which exists and is self-acting11 like the cholera12? No, Competition is only the absence of constraint13. In what concerns my own interest, I desire to choose for myself, not that another should choose for me, or in spite of me—that is all. And if any one pretends to substitute his judgment for mine in what concerns me, I should ask to substitute mine for his in what concerns him. What guarantee have we that things would go on better in this way? It is evident that Competition is Liberty. To take away the liberty of acting is to destroy the possibility, and consequently the power, of choosing, of judging, of comparing; it is to annihilate14 intelligence, to annihilate thought, to annihilate man. From whatever quarter they set out, to this point all modern reformers tend—to ameliorate society they begin by annihilating15 the individual, under the pretext16 that all evils come from this source—as if all good did not come from it too.
We have seen that services are exchanged for services. In reality, every man comes into the world charged with the responsibility of providing for his satisfactions by his efforts. When another man saves us an effort, we ought to save him an effort in return. He imparts to us a satisfaction resulting from his effort; we ought to do the same for him.
But who is to make the comparison? for between these efforts, these pains, these services exchanged, there is necessarily a comparison to be made, in order to arrive at equivalence, at justice;—unless indeed injustice17, inequality, chance, is to be our rule, which would just be another way of putting human intelligence hors de cause. We must, then, have a judge; and who is this judge to be? Is it not quite natural that in every case wants should be judged of by those who experience them, satisfactions by those who seek them, efforts by those who exchange them? And is it seriously proposed to substitute for this universal vigilance of the parties interested, a social authority (suppose that of the reformer himself), charged with determining in all parts of the world the delicate conditions of these countless18 acts of interchange? Do you not see that this would be to set up the most fallible, the most universal, the most arbitrary, the most inquisitorial, the most insupportable—we are fortunately able to add, the most impossible—of all despotisms ever conceived in the brain of pasha or mufti?
It is sufficient to know that Competition is nothing else than [p290] the absence of an arbitrary authority as judge of exchanges, in order to be satisfied that it is indestructible. Illegitimate force may no doubt restrain, counteract19, trammel the liberty of exchanging, as it may the liberty of walking; but it can annihilate neither the one nor the other without annihilating man. This being so, it remains for us to inquire whether Competition tends to the happiness or misery20 of mankind; a question which amounts to this,—Is the human race naturally progressive, or are its tendencies fatally retrograde?
I hesitate not to say that Competition, which, indeed, we might denominate Liberty, despite the repulsion which it excites, despite the declamations to which it has given rise, is a law which is democratical in its essence. Of all the laws to which Providence22 has confided23 the progress of human society, it is the most progressive, levelling, and communautaire. It is this law which brings successively into the common domain24 the use and enjoyment25 of commodities which nature has accorded gratuitously26 only to certain countries. It is this law, again, which brings into the common domain all the conquests which the genius of each age bequeaths to succeeding generations, leaving them only supplementary28 labours to execute, which last they continue to exchange with one another, without succeeding, as they desire, in obtaining a recompense for the co-operation of natural agents; and if these labours, as happens always in the beginning, possess a value which is not proportionate to their intensity29, it is still Competition which, by its incessant30 but unperceived action, restores an equilibrium31 which is sanctioned by justice, and which is more exact than any that the fallible sagacity of a human magistracy could by possibility establish. Far from Competition leading to inequality, as has been erroneously alleged33, we may assert that all factitious inequality is imputable34 to its absence; and if the gulf35 between the Grand Lama and a Paria is more profound than that which separates the President from an artisan of the United States, the reason is this, that Competition (or Liberty), which is curbed37 and put down in Asia, is not so in America. This is the reason why, whilst the Socialists39 see in Competition the source of all that is evil, we trace to the attacks which have been made upon it the disturbance40 of all that is good. Although this great law has been misunderstood by the Socialists and their adepts41; although it is frequently harsh in its operation, no law is more fertile in social harmonies, more beneficent in general results; no law attests42 more brilliantly the measureless superiority of the designs of God over the vain and powerless combinations of men. [p291]
I must here remind the reader of that singular but unquestionable result of the social order to which I have already invited his attention,63 and which the power of habit hides too frequently from our view. It is this, that the sum total of satisfactions which falls to each member of society is much superior to those which he could procure43 for himself by his own efforts. In other words, there is an evident disproportion between our consumption and our labour. This phenomenon, which all of us can easily verify, if we turn our regards upon ourselves, ought, it seems to me, to inspire some gratitude44 to society, to which we owe it.
We come into this world destitute45 of everything, tormented46 with numerous wants, and provided with nothing but faculties47 to enable us to struggle against them. A priori, it would seem that all we could expect would be to obtain satisfactions proportionate to our labour. If we obtain more, infinitely48 more, to what do we owe the excess? Precisely49 to that natural organization against which we are constantly declaiming, when we are not engaged in seeking to subvert50 it.
In itself the phenomenon is truly extraordinary. That certain men consume more than they produce is easily explained, if in one way or other they usurp51 the rights of other people—if they receive services without rendering52 them. But how can that be true of all men at the same time? How happens it that, after having exchanged their services without constraint, without spoliation, upon a footing of equivalence, each man can say to himself with truth, I consume in a day more than I could produce in a century?
The reader has seen that the additional element which resolves the problem is the co-operation of natural agents, constantly becoming more and more effective in the work of production; it is gratuitous27 utility falling continually into the domain of Community; it is the labour of heat and of cold, of light, of gravitation, of affinity53, of elasticity54, coming progressively to be added to the labour of man, diminishing the value of services by rendering them more easy.
I must have but feebly explained the theory of value if the reader imagines that value diminishes immediately and of its own accord, by the simple fact of the co-operation of natural forces, and the relief thereby56 afforded to human labour. It is not so; for then we might say with the English Economists57 that value is proportional to labour. The man who is aided by a natural and gratuitous force renders his services more easily; but he does not [p292] on that account renounce59 voluntarily any portion whatever of his accustomed remuneration. To induce him to do that, external coercion—pressure from without—severe but not unjust pressure—is necessary. It is Competition which exerts this pressure. As long as Competition does not intervene, as long as the man who has availed himself of a natural agent preserves his secret, that natural agent is gratuitous, but it is not yet common. The victory has been gained, but to the profit only of a single man, or a single class. It is not yet a benefit to mankind at large. No change has yet taken place, except that one description of services, although partly relieved from the pain of muscular exertion60, still exacts all its former remuneration. We have, on the one hand, a man who exacts from all his fellows the same amount of labour as formerly61, although he offers them a limited amount of his own labour in return. On the other, we have mankind at large, who are still obliged to make the same sacrifice of time and of labour in order to obtain a product now realized in part by nature.
Were things to remain in this state, a principle of indefinite inequality would be introduced into the world with every new invention. Not only could we not say that value is proportional to labour; we could not even say that value tends to become proportional to labour. All that we have said in the preceding chapters about gratuitous utility and progressive community would be chimerical62. It would not be true that services are exchanged against services, in such a way that the gifts of God are transferred gratuitously from one man to another, down to the ultimate recipient63, who is the consumer. Each would continue to be paid, not only for his labour, but for the natural forces which he had once succeeded in setting to work; in a word, society would be constituted on the principle of universal Monopoly, in place of on the principle of progressive Community.
But it is not so. God, who has bestowed64 on all His creatures heat, light, gravitation, air, water, the soil, the marvels65 of vegetable life, electricity, and countless other benefits which it is beyond my power to enumerate,—God, who has placed in the human breast the feeling of personal interest, which, like a magnet, attracts everything to itself,—God, I say, has placed also in the bosom66 of society another spring of action, which He has charged with the care of preserving to His benefits their original destination, which was, that they should be gratuitous and common. This spring of action is Competition.
Thus, Personal Interest is that irrepressible force belonging to the individual which urges us on to progress and discovery, which [p293] spurs us on to exertion, but leads also to monopoly. Competition is that force belonging to the species which is not less irrepressible, and which snatches progress, as it is realized, from individual hands, and makes it the common inheritance of the great family of mankind. These two forces, in each of which, considered individually, we might find something to blame, thus constitute social Harmony, by the play of their combinations, when regarded in conjunction.
And we may remark, in passing, that we ought not to be at all surprised that the individual interests of men, considered as producers, should from the beginning have risen up against Competition, should have rebuked67 it, and sought to destroy it—calling in for this purpose the assistance of force, fraud, privilege, sophistry68, monopoly, restriction69, legislative70 protection, etc. The morality of the means shows us clearly enough the morality of the end. But the astonishing and melancholy71 thing is, that science herself—false science, it is true—propagated with so much zeal72 by the socialist38 schools, in the name of philanthropy, equality, and fraternity, should have espoused73 the cause of Individualism, in its narrowest and most exclusive manifestation74, and should have deserted75 the cause of humanity.
Let us see now how Competition acts:—
Man, under the influence of self-interest, is always, and necessarily, on the outlook for such circumstances as may give the greatest value to his services. He is not long in discovering that, as regards the gifts of God, he may be favoured in three ways:
1. He may appropriate to his own exclusive use these gifts themselves; or,
2. He may alone know the process by which they can be made useful; or,
3. He alone may possess the instrument by means of which their co-operation in the work of production can be secured.
In any of these cases, he gives little of his own labour in exchange for much of the labour of other men. His services have a high relative value, and we are led to believe that this excess of value resides in the natural agent. If it were so, this value would not be subject to fall. Now, what proves that the value is in the service is, that we find Competition diminishing both value and service simultaneously76.
1. Natural agents—the gifts of God—are not distributed uniformly over the different countries of the world. What an infinite variety of vegetable productions are spread over the wide range [p294] extending from the region of the pine to the region of the palm tree! Here the soil is more productive, there the heat is more vivifying. In one quarter we meet with stone, in another with lime, in another with iron, copper77, or coal. Water-power is not to be found everywhere, nor can we everywhere avail ourselves to an equal extent of the power of the winds. Distance, from the objects we find essential, of itself makes a vast difference in the obstacles which our efforts encounter. Even the human faculties vary in some measure with climate and races.
It is easy to see that, but for the law of Competition, this inequality in the distribution of the gifts of God would lead to a corresponding inequality in the condition of men.
Whoever happened to have within reach a natural advantage would profit by it, but his fellow-men would not. He would not permit other men to participate in it through his instrumentality, without stipulating78 an excessive remuneration, the amount of which he would have the power of fixing arbitrarily. He could attach to his services any value he pleased. We have seen that the extreme limits between which it must be determined79 are, the pains taken by the man who renders the service and the pains saved to the man who receives it. Competition alone hinders its being always raised to the maximum. The inhabitant of the tropics, for example, would say to the European—“Thanks to the sun’s rays, I can, with labour equal to ten, procure a given quantity of sugar, coffee, cocoa, or cotton, whilst you, obliged in your cold climate to have recourse to hot-houses, stoves, and shelter, cannot obtain the same quantity but with labour equal to a hundred. You wish to obtain my coffee, sugar, or cotton, and you would not be sorry were I to take into account in the transaction only the pains which I have taken, the labour I have expended81. But what I regard principally is the pains, the labour, I have saved you; for, aware that that is the limit of your resistance, I make it the limit of my exaction82. As what I produce with an amount of labour equal to ten, you could produce only with labour equal to a hundred, were I to demand in exchange for my sugar a commodity which cost you labour equal to 101, you would certainly refuse; but all that I ask is labour equal to 99. You may higgle and look gruff for a little, but you will come to my terms; for at this rate you have still an advantage by the exchange. You think these terms unfair; but, after all, it is not to you but to me that God has vouchsafed83 the advantage of a higher temperature. I know that I am in a position to take advantage of this gift of Providence, by depriving you of it unless you pay me a tax, for [p295] I have no competitors. Here, then, are my sugar, my cocoa, my coffee, my cotton—take them on the conditions I impose—or raise them for yourself—or do without them.”
It is true that the European might hold to the inhabitant of the tropics some such language as this: “Turn over your soil, dig pits, search for iron and coal, and felicitate yourself if you find any; for if not, it is my determination to push my exactions to an extreme also. God has vouchsafed to us both precious gifts. We appropriate as much of them as we require, but we will not suffer others to touch them without paying us a tax.”
Even if things took place in this way, scientific exactness would not allow us to attribute to natural agents that Value which resides only in services. But the error would be harmless, for the result would be absolutely the same. Services would still be exchanged against services, but they would exhibit no tendency to conform to efforts, or labour, as a measure. The gifts of God would be personal privileges, not common benefits; and we might perhaps have some reason to complain that the Author of things had treated us in a way so incurably84 unequal. Should we, then, be brethren? Could we regard ourselves as the children of a common Father? The absence of Competition, that is to say of Liberty, would in the first instance be an insuperable bar to Equality. The absence of Equality would exclude all idea of Fraternity—and nothing of the republican motto64 would then be left.
But let Competition be introduced, and we shall see it instantly present an insuperable barrier to all such leonine bargains, to all such forestalling85 of the gifts of God, to all such revolting pretensions86 in the appreciation87 of services, to all such inequalities with efforts exchanged.
And let us remark, first of all, that Competition acts forcibly, called forth88 as it is by these very inequalities. Labour betakes itself instinctively89 to the quarter where it is best remunerated, and never fails to put an end to this exceptional advantage, so that Inequality is only a spur which urges us on in spite of ourselves towards Equality. It is in truth one of the most beautiful final intentions observable in the social mechanism90. Infinite Goodness, which manifests beneficence everywhere, would seem to have made choice of the avaricious91 producer in order to effect an equitable92 distribution among all; and truly it is a marvellous sight this, of self-interest realizing continually what it ever desires to avoid. Man, as a producer, is necessarily, inevitably93, attracted by [p296] excessive returns, which he thus reduces to the ordinary rate. He pursues his own interest; and without knowing it, without wishing it, without seeking it, he promotes the general good.
Thus, to recur94 to our former example, the inhabitant of the tropics, trafficking in the gifts of God, realizes an excessive remuneration, and by that very means brings down upon himself Competition. Human labour exerts itself in proportion to the magnitude of the inequality, if I may use the expression, and never rests until that inequality is effaced95. Under the action of Competition, we see the tropical labour, which was equal to ten, exchanged successively for European labour equal to 80, 50, 40, 20, and finally to 10. Under the empire of the natural laws of society, there is no reason why this should not take place; that is to say, there is no reason why services exchanged should not be measured by the labour performed, the pains taken,—the gifts of God on both sides being gratuitous and into the bargain. We have only to consider, in order to appreciate and bless the revolution which is thus effected. In the first instance, the labour undergone on both sides is equal, and this satisfies the human mind, which always desires justice. Then what has become of the gift of God? Attend to this, reader. No one has been deprived of it. In this respect we have not allowed ourselves to be imposed upon by the clamours of the tropical producer. The Brazilian, in as far as he is himself a consumer of sugar, or cotton, or coffee, never ceases to profit by the sun’s rays—his good fortune does not cease to aid him in the work of production. What he has lost is only the unjust power of levying96 a tax upon the consumption of the inhabitants of Europe. The beneficence of Providence, because gratuitous, has become, as it ought to become, common; for common and gratuitous are in reality the same thing.
The gift of God has become common—and the reader will observe that I avail myself here of a special fact to elucidate97 a phenomenon which is universal—this gift, I say, has become common to all. This is not declamation21, but the expression of a truth which is demonstrable. Why has this beautiful phenomenon been misunderstood? Because community is realized under the form of value annihilated98, and the mind with difficulty lays hold of negations. But I ask, Is it not true that when, in order to obtain a certain quantity of sugar, coffee, or cotton, I give only one-tenth of the labour which I should find it necessary to expend80 in producing the commodity myself, and this because the Brazilian sun performs the other nine-tenths of the work,—Is it not true, I say, that in that case I still exchange labour for labour, and [p297] really and truly obtain, over and above the Brazilian labour, and into the bargain, the co-operation of the climate of the tropics? Can I not affirm with rigorous exactitude that I have become, that all men have become, in the same way as the Indians and Americans, that is to say gratuitously, participators in the liberality of nature, so far as the commodities in question are concerned?
England possesses productive coal mines. That is no doubt a great local advantage, more especially if we suppose, as I shall do for the sake of argument, that the Continent possesses no coal mines. Apart from the consideration of exchange, the advantage which this gives to the people of England is the possession of fuel in greater abundance than other nations,—fuel obtained with less labour, and at less expense of useful time. As soon as exchange comes into operation—keeping out of view Competition—the exclusive possession of these mines enables the people of England to demand a considerable remuneration, and to set a high price upon their labour. Not being in a situation to perform this labour ourselves, or procure what we want from another quarter, we have no alternative but to submit. English labour devoted100 to this description of work will be well remunerated; in other words, coal will be dear, and the bounty101 of nature may be considered as conferred on the people of one nation, and not on mankind at large.
But this state of things cannot last; for a great natural and social law is opposed to it—Competition. For the very reason that this species of labour is largely remunerated in England, it will be in great demand there, for men are always in quest of high remuneration. The number of miners will increase, both in consequence of the sons of miners devoting themselves to their fathers’ trade, and in consequence of men transferring their industry to mining from other departments. They will offer to work for a smaller recompense, and their remuneration will go on diminishing until it reach the normal rate, or the rate generally given in the country for analogous102 work. This means that the price of English coal will fall in France; that a given amount of French labour will procure a greater and greater quantity of English coal, or rather of English labour incorporated and worked up in coal; and, finally (and this is what I pray you to remark), that the gift which nature would appear to have bestowed upon England has in reality been conferred on the whole human race. The coal of Newcastle is brought within the reach of all men gratuitously, as far as the mere103 material is concerned. This is neither a paradox104 nor an exaggeration,—it is brought within their reach like the [p298] water of the brook105, on the single condition of going to fetch it, or remunerating those who undertake that labour for us. When we purchase coal, it is not the coal that we pay for, but the labour necessary to extract it and transport it. All that we do is to give a corresponding amount of labour which we have worked up or incorporated in wine or in silk. So true is it that the liberality of nature has been extended to France, that the labour which we refund106 is not greater than that which it would have been necessary to undergo had the deposit of coal been in France. Competition has established equality between the two nations as far as coal is concerned, except as regards the inevitable107 and inconsiderable difference resulting from distance and carriage.
I have given two examples, and, to render the phenomenon more striking, I have selected international transactions, which are effected on a great scale. I fear I may thus have diverted the reader’s attention from the same phenomena108 acting incessantly109 around us in our every-day transactions. Let him take in his hand the most familiar objects, a glass, a nail, a loaf, a piece of cloth, a book. Let him meditate110 on such ordinary products, and reflect how great an amount of gratuitous utility would never but for Competition have become common for humanity at large, although remaining gratuitous for the producer. He will find that, thanks to Competition, in purchasing his loaf he pays nothing for the action of the sun, nothing for the rain, nothing for the frost, nothing for the laws of vegetable physiology111, nothing even for the powers of the soil, despite all that has been said on that subject; nothing for the law of gravitation set to work by the miller112; nothing for the law of combustion113 set to work by the baker114; nothing for the horse-power set to work by the carrier; that he pays only for the services rendered, the pains taken, by human agents; and let him reflect that, but for Competition, he must have paid, over and above, a tax for the intervention115 of all these natural agents; that that tax would have had no other limit than the difficulty which he might himself have experienced in procuring116 the loaf by his own efforts, and that consequently a whole life would not have been sufficient to supply the remuneration which would have been demanded of him. Let him think farther, that he does not make use of a single commodity which might not give rise to the same reflections, and that these reflections apply not to him only, but to all mankind, and he will then comprehend the radical117 error of those socialist theories which, looking only at the surface of things, the epidermis118 of society, have been set up with so much levity119 against Competition, in other words, against human Liberty. He will then regard [p299] Competition, which preserves to the gifts of nature, unequally distributed, their common and gratuitous character, as the principle of a just and natural equalization; he will admire it as the force which holds in check the egotism of individual interest, with which at the same time it is so artistically120 combined as to serve both as a curb36 to avarice121 and a spur to exertion; and he will bless it as a most striking manifestation of God’s impartial122 solicitude123 for the good of all His creatures.
From what has been said, we may deduce the solution of one of the problems which have been most keenly controverted124, namely, that of free trade as between nation and nation. If it be true, as seems to me incontestable, that Competition leads the various countries of the globe to exchange with one another nothing else than labour, exertion more and more equalized, and to transfer at the same time reciprocally, and into the bargain, the natural advantages that each possesses; how blind and absurd must those men be who exclude foreign products by legislative measures, under the pretext that they are cheap, and have little value in proportion to their aggregate126 utility; that is to say, precisely because they include a large proportion of gratuitous utility!
I have said, and I repeat it, that I have confidence in a theory when I find it in accordance with universal practice. Now, it is certain that countries would effect many exchanges with each other were they not interdicted127 by force. It requires the bayonet to prevent them; and for that reason it is wrong to prevent them.
2. Another circumstance places certain men in a favourable128 and exceptional situation as regards remuneration—I mean the personal and exclusive knowledge of the processes by means of which natural agents can alone be appropriated. What we term invention is a conquest by human genius; and these beautiful and pacific conquests, which are, in the first instance, a source of wealth for those who achieve them, become by-and-by, under the action of Competition, the common and gratuitous patrimony129 of all.
The forces of nature belong indeed to all. Gravitation, for instance, is common property; it surrounds us, pervades130 us, commands us. And yet were there but one mode of making gravitation co-operate towards a useful and determinate result, and but one man acquainted with that mode, this man might set a high price upon his work, or refuse to work except in exchange for a very high remuneration. His demands would have no limit [p300] until they reached the point at which the consumers must make greater sacrifices than the old processes entailed131 upon them. He may have contrived132, for example, to annihilate nine-tenths of the labour necessary to produce a certain commodity, x. But x has at present a current market-price determined by the labour which its production by the ordinary methods exacts. The inventor sells x at the market-price; in other words, his labour receives a recompense ten times higher than that of his rivals. This is the first phase of the invention.
So far we discover nothing unjust or unfair. It is just and equitable that the man who makes the world acquainted with a useful process should be rewarded for it;—A chacun selon sa capacité.
Observe, too, that as yet mankind, with the exception of the inventor, have gained nothing unless virtually, and in perspective, so to speak, since in order to procure the commodity x, each acquirer must make a sacrifice equal to the former cost.
Now, however, the invention enters its second phase—that of imitation. Excessive remuneration awakens133 covetousness134. The new process is more generally adopted; the price of the commodity x continues to fall, and the remuneration goes on diminishing in proportion as the imitation becomes more distant in date from the original invention, that is to say, in proportion as it becomes more easy, and for that reason less meritorious135. Surely there is nothing in all this that cannot be avowed136 by a legislation the most advanced and the most impartial.
At length the invention reaches its third phase, its final stage, that of universal diffusion137, when it becomes common and gratuitous. The cycle has been completed when Competition has brought back the remuneration of the producers of x to the general and normal rate yielded by all analogous work. Then the nine-tenths of the labour, which by the hypothesis we supposed to be saved by the invention, become an acquisition to mankind at large. The utility of the commodity x remains the same; but nine-tenths of that commodity are now the product of gravitation, a force which was formerly common to all in principle, but has now become common to all in this special application. So true is this, that all the consumers of that commodity throughout the world may now acquire it with one-tenth of the labour which it formerly cost. The surplus labour has been entirely139 annihilated by the new process.
If we consider that there is no human invention which has not described this circle, that x is here an algebraical sign which represents corn, clothing, books, ships,—in the production of which an [p301] incalculable amount of Labour or Value has been annihilated, by the plough, the spinning-jenny, the printing-press, and the sail; that this observation is applicable to the humblest of tools as well as to the most complicated mechanism, to the nail, the wedge, the lever, as well as to the steam-engine and the electric telegraph, we shall come, I trust, to understand the solution of this grand problem of human society, that an amount of utility and enjoyment, always greater, and more and more equally distributed, comes to remunerate each determinate quantity of human labour.
3. I have shown how Competition brings into the domain of the common and gratuitous both natural agents and the processes by which they are made operative. It remains to show that Competition executes the same function with reference to the instruments by means of which we set these agents to work. It is not enough that there should exist in nature a force, such as heat, light, gravitation, electricity; it is not enough that intelligence conceives the means of making that force available;—there must be instruments to realize this conception of the mind, and provisions to maintain those who devote themselves to it during the operation.
As regards remuneration, there is a third circumstance which favours a man, or a class of men, namely, the possession of Capital. The man who has in his hands the tools necessary for labour, the materials to work upon, and the provisions for his subsistence during the operation, is in a situation to determine his own remuneration. The principle of this is equitable, for capital is only anterior140 labour which has not yet been remunerated. The capitalist is in a good position to impose terms; but observe that, even when free from Competition, there is a limit which his demands never can exceed—this limit is the point at which his remuneration would absorb all the advantages of the service which he renders. In these circumstances, it is unreasonable141 to talk, as is so often done, of the tyranny of capital, seeing that even in the most extreme cases neither its presence nor its absence can injure the condition of the labourer. Like the inhabitant of the tropics, who has an intensity of heat at his disposal which nature has denied to colder regions—or like the inventor, who possesses the secret of a process unknown to other men—all that the capitalist can say is: “Would you profit by my labour—I set such a price upon it; if you find it too high, do as you have done hitherto—do without it.”
But Competition takes place among capitalists. Tools, materials, and provisions, contribute to the creation of utilities only [p302] when employed. There is an emulation142, then, among capitalists to find employment for their capital. All that this emulation forces them to abate143 from the extreme demand, of which I have just assigned the limits, resolving itself into a reduction of the price of the commodity, is so much clear profit, so much gratuitous gain, for the consumer, that is to say, for mankind.
This gain, however, can clearly never be absolutely gratuitous; for, since capital represents labour, that capital must always possess in itself the principle of remuneration.
Transactions relative to Capital are subject to the universal law of exchanges; and exchanges take place only because there is an advantage for the two contracting parties in effecting them,—an advantage which has no doubt a tendency to be equalized, but which accidentally may be greater for the one than for the other. There is a limit to the remuneration of capital, beyond which limit no one will consent to borrow it. This limit is the minimum of service for the borrower. In the same way, there is a limit beyond which no one will consent to lend, and this limit is the minimum of remuneration for the lender. This is self-evident. If the requirements of one of the contracting parties are pushed so far as to reduce to zero the benefit to be derived144 by the other from the transaction, the loan becomes impossible. The remuneration of capital oscillates between these two extreme terms, pressed towards the maximum by the Competition of borrowers, brought back towards the minimum by the Competition of lenders; so that, by a necessity which is in harmony with justice, it rises when capital is scarce, and falls when it is abundant.
Many Economists imagine that the number of borrowers increases more rapidly than it is possible to create capital to lend to them, whence it would follow that the natural tendency of interest is to rise. The fact is decidedly the other way, and on all sides accordingly we perceive civilisation145 lowering the return for capital. This return, it is said, is 30 or 40 per cent. at Rome, 20 per cent. in Brazil, 10 per cent. in Algeria, 8 per cent. in Spain, 6 per cent. in Italy, 5 per cent. in Germany, 4 per cent. in France, 3 per cent. in England, and still less in Holland. Now all that part of the return for capital which is annihilated by progress, although lost to the capitalist, is not lost to mankind. If interest, originally at 40 per cent., is reduced to 2 per cent., all commodities will be freed from 38 parts in 40 of this element of cost. They will reach the consumer freed from this charge to the extent of nineteen-twentieths. This is a force which, like natural agents, like expeditive processes, resolves itself into abundance, equalization, [p303] and, finally, into an elevation146 of the general level of the human race.
I have still to say a few words on the Competition of labourer with labourer,—a subject which in these days has given rise to so much sentimental147 declamation. But have we not already exhausted148 this subject? I have shown that, owing to the action of Competition, men cannot long receive an exceptional remuneration for the co-operation of natural forces, for their acquaintance with new processes, or for the possession of instruments by means of which they avail themselves of these forces. This proves that efforts have a tendency to be exchanged on a footing of equality, or, in other words, that value tends to become proportionate to labour. Then I do not see what can justly be termed the Competition of labourers; still less do I see how it can injure their condition, since in this point of view workmen are themselves the consumers. The working class means everybody, and it is precisely this vast community which reaps ultimately the benefits of Competition, and all the advantage of values successively annihilated by progress.
The evolution is this: Services are exchanged against services, values against values. When a man (or a class) appropriates a natural agent or a new process, his demands are regulated, not by the labour which he undergoes, but by the labour which he saves to others. He presses his exactions to the extreme limit, without ever being able to injure the condition of others. He sets the greatest possible value on his services. But gradually, by the operation of Competition, this value tends to become proportioned to the labour performed; so that the evolution is brought to a conclusion when equal labour is exchanged for equal labour, both serving as the vehicle of an ever-increasing amount of gratuitous utility, to the benefit of the community at large. In such circumstances, to assert that Competition can be injurious to the labourer, would be to fall into a palpable contradiction.
And yet this is constantly asserted, and constantly believed; and why? Because by the word labourer is understood not the great labouring community, but a particular class. You divide the community into two classes. On one side you place all those who are possessed149 of capital, who live wholly or partly on anterior labour, or by intellectual labour, or the proceeds of taxation150; on the other, you place those who have nothing but their hands, who live by wages, or—to use the consecrated151 expression—the prolétaires. You look to the relative position of these two classes, [p304] and you ask if, in that relative position, the Competition which takes place among those who live by wages is not fatal to them?
The situation of men of this last class, it is said, is essentially152 precarious153. As they receive their wages from day to day, they live from hand to mouth. In the discussion which, under a free régime, precedes every bargain, they cannot wait; they must find work for to-morrow on any terms, under pain of death. If this be not strictly154 true of them all, it is at least true of many of them, and that is enough to depress the entire class; for those who are the most pressed and the poorest capitulate first, and establish the general rate of wages. The result is, that wages tend to fall to the lowest rate which is compatible with bare subsistence—and in this state of things, the occurrence of the least excess of Competition among the labourers is a veritable calamity155, for, as regards them, the question is not one of diminished prosperity, but of simple existence.
Undoubtedly156 there is much that is true, much that is too true, in fact, in this description. To deny the sufferings and wretchedness of that class of men who bear so material a part in the business of production, would be to shut our eyes to the light of day. It is, in fact, this deplorable condition of a great number of our brethren which forms the subject of what has been justly called the social problem; for although other classes of society are visited also with disquietudes, sufferings, sudden changes of fortune, commercial crises, and economic convulsions, it may nevertheless be said with truth that liberty would be accepted as a solution of the problem, did mere liberty not appear powerless to cure that rankling157 sore which we denominate Pauperism158.
And although it is here, pre-eminently, that the social problem lies, the reader will not expect that I should enter upon it in this place. Its solution, please God, may be the result of the entire work, but it clearly cannot be the result of a single chapter.
I am at present engaged in the exposition of general laws, which I believe to be harmonious159; and I trust the reader will now begin to be convinced that these laws exist, and that their action tends towards community, and consequently towards equality. But I have not denied that the action of these laws is profoundly troubled by disturbing causes. If, then, we now encounter inequality as a stubborn fact, how can we be in circumstances to form a judgment regarding it until we have first of all investigated the regular laws of the social order, and the causes which disturb the action of these laws? [p305]
On the other hand, I have ignored neither the existence of evil nor its mission. I have ventured to assert, that free-will having been vouchsafed to man, it is not necessary to confine the term harmony to an aggregate from which evil should be excluded; for free-will implies error, at least possible error, and error is evil. Social harmony, like everything which concerns man, is relative. Evil is a necessary part of the machinery160 destined161 to overcome error, ignorance, injustice, by bringing into play two great laws of our nature—responsibility and solidarity162.
Now, taking pauperism as an existing fact, are we to impute163 it to the natural laws which govern the social order,—or to human institutions which act in a sense contrary to these laws,—or, finally, to the people themselves, who are the victims, and who, by their errors and their faults, have brought down this severe chastisement164 on their own heads?
In other words, does pauperism exist by providential destination,—or, on the contrary, by what remains of the artificial in our political organization,—or as a personal retribution? Fatality165, Injustice, Responsibility—to which of these three causes must we attribute this frightful166 sore?
I hesitate not to assert that it cannot be the result of the natural laws which have hitherto been the subject of our investigations167, seeing that these laws all tend to equalization by amelioration; that is to say, to bring all men to one and the same level, which level is continually rising. This, then, is not the place to seek a solution of the problem of pauperism.
At present, if we would consider specially99 that class of labourers who execute the most material portion of the work of production, and who, in general, having no interest in the profits, live upon a fixed169 remuneration called wages, the question we have to investigate is this: Apart from the consideration of good or bad economic institutions—apart from the consideration of the evils which the men who live by wages [the prolétaires] bring upon themselves by their faults—what is, as regards them, the proper effect of Competition?
For this class, as for all, the operation of Competition is twofold. They feel it both as buyers and as sellers of services. The error of those who write upon these subjects is never to look but at one side of the question, like natural philosophers, who, if they took into account only centrifugal force, would never cease to believe and to prophesy170 that all was over with us. Grant their false datum171, and you will see with what irrefragable logic172 they conduct you to this sinister173 conclusion. The same may be said of the [p306] lamentations which the Socialists found upon the exclusive consideration of centrifugal Competition, if I may be allowed the expression. They forget to take into account centripetal174 Competition; and that is sufficient to reduce their doctrines175 to puerile177 declamation. They forget that the workman, when he presents himself in the market with the wages he has earned, becomes a centre towards which innumerable branches of industry tend, and that he profits then by that universal Competition of which all trades complain in their turn.
It is true that the labourer, when he regards himself as a producer, as the person who supplies labour or services, complains also of Competition. Grant, then, that Competition benefits him on one side, while it pinches him on the other, the question comes to be, Is the balance favourable or unfavourable—or is there compensation?
I must have explained myself very obscurely if the reader does not see that in the play of this marvellous mechanism, the action of Competition, apparently178 antagonistic179, tends to the singular and consoling result, that there is a balance which is favourable to all at the same time; caused by gratuitous Utility continually enlarging the circle of production, and falling continually into the domain of Community. Now, that which becomes common is profitable to all without hurting any one; we may even say—for this is mathematically certain—is profitable to each in proportion to his previous poverty. It is this portion of gratuitous utility, forced by Competition to become common, which causes the tendency of value to become proportioned to labour, to the evident benefit of the labourer. This, too, renders evident the social solution which I have pressed so much on the attention of the reader, and which is only concealed180 by the illusions of habit,—for a determinate amount of labour each receives an amount of satisfactions which tends to be increased and equalized.
Moreover, the condition of the labourer does not depend upon one economic law, but upon all. To become acquainted with that condition, to discover the prospects181 and the future of the labourer, this is Political Economy; for what other object could that science have in view? . . . But I am wrong—we have still spoliators. What causes the equivalence of services? Liberty. What impairs182 that equivalence? Oppression. Such is the circle we have still to traverse.
As regards the condition of that class of labourers who execute the more immediate55 work of production, it cannot be appreciated until we are in a situation to discover in what manner the law of [p307] Competition is combined with that of Wages and Population, and also with the disturbing effects of unequal taxes and monopolies.
I shall add but a few words on the subject of Competition. It is very clear that it has no natural tendency to diminish the amount of the enjoyments183 which are distributed over society. Does Competition tend to make this distribution unequal? If there be anything evident in the world, it is that after having, if I may so express myself, attached to each service, to each value, a larger proportion of utility, Competition labours incessantly to level the services themselves, to render them proportional to efforts. Is Competition not the spur which urges men into profitable branches of industry, and urges them out of those which are unprofitable? Its proper action, then, is to realize equality more and more, by elevating the social level.
Let us not misunderstand each other, however, on this word equality. It does not imply that all men are to have the same remuneration, but that they are to have a remuneration proportioned to the quantity, and even to the quality of their efforts.
A multitude of circumstances contribute to render the remuneration of labour unequal (I speak here only of free labour, subject to Competition); but if we look at it more narrowly, we shall find that this fancied inequality, almost always just and necessary, is in reality nothing else than substantial equality.
C?teris paribus, there are larger profits in those trades which are attended with danger than in those which are not so; in those which require a lengthened184 apprenticeship185, and expensive training long unremunerated—which imply the patient exercise of certain domestic virtues—than in those where mere muscular exertion is sufficient; in professions which demand a cultivated mind and refined taste, than in trades which require mere brute186 force. Is not all this just? Now, Competition establishes necessarily these distinctions—and society has no need of the assistance of Fourier or Louis Blanc in the matter.
Of all these circumstances, that which operates in the greatest number of cases is the inequality of instruction. Now here, as everywhere else, we find Competition exerting its twofold action, levelling classes, and elevating society.
If we suppose society to be composed of two layers or strata187, placed one above another, in one of which the intelligent principle prevails, and in the other the principle of brute force; and if we study the natural relations of these two layers, we shall easily discover a force of attraction in the one, and a force of aspiration188 in the other, which co-operate towards their fusion138. The very inequality [p308] of profits breathes into the inferior ranks an inextinguishable ardour to mount to the region of ease and leisure; and this ardour is seconded by the superior knowledge which distinguishes the higher classes. The methods of teaching are improved; books fall in price; instruction is acquired in less time, and at a smaller cost; science, formerly monopolized189 by a class or a caste, and veiled in a dead language, or sealed up in hieroglyphics190, is written and printed in the vulgar tongue; it pervades the atmosphere, if I may use the expression, and is breathed as freely as the air of heaven.
Nor is this all. At the same time that an education more universal and more equal brings the two classes of society into closer approximation, some very important economic phenomena, which are connected with the great law of Competition, come to aid and accelerate their fusion. The progress of the mechanical arts diminishes continually the proportion of manual labour. The division of labour, by simplifying and separating each of the operations which concur191 in a productive result, brings within the reach of all, branches of industry which could formerly be engaged in only by a few. Moreover, a great many employments which required at the outset much knowledge and varied192 acquirements, fall, by the mere lapse193 of time, into routine, and come within the sphere of action of classes generally the least instructed, as has happened in the case of agriculture. Agricultural processes, which in ancient times procured194 to their discoverers the honours of an apotheosis195, are now inherited and almost monopolized by the rudest of men; and to such a degree, that this important branch of human industry is, so to speak, entirely withdrawn196 from the well-educated classes.
From the preceding observations it is possible that a false conclusion may be drawn197. It may be said—“We perceive, indeed, that Competition lowers remuneration in all countries, in all departments of industry, in all ranks, and levels, by reducing, it; but in that case the wages of unskilled labour, of physical exertion, must become the type, the standard, of all remuneration.”
I must have been misunderstood, if you have not perceived that Competition, which labours to bring down all excessive remuneration towards an average more and more uniform, raises necessarily this average. I grant that it pinches men in their capacity of producers, but in so doing it ameliorates the condition of the human race in the only way in which it can reasonably be elevated, namely, by an increase of material prosperity, ease, leisure, moral and intellectual improvement, in a word, by enlarging consumption. [p309]
Will it be said that, in point of fact, mankind have not made the progress that this theory seems to imply?
I answer, in the first place, that in modern society Competition is far from occupying the sphere of its natural action. Our laws run counter to it, at least in as great a degree as they favour its action; and when it is asked whether the inequality of conditions is owing to its presence or its absence, it is sufficient to look at the men who make the greatest figure among us, and dazzle us by the display of their scandalous wealth, in order to assure ourselves that inequality, so far as it is artificial and unjust, has for foundation conquests, monopolies, restrictions198, privileged offices, functions, and places, ministerial trafficking, public borrowing,—all things with which Competition has nothing to do.
Moreover, I believe we have overlooked the real progress which mankind have made since the very recent epoch199 to which we must assign the partial enfranchisement200 of labour. It has been justly said that much philosophy is needed in order to discern facts which are continually passing before us. We are not astonished at what an honest and laborious201 family of the working class daily consumes, because habit has made us familiar with this strange phenomenon. If, however, we compare the comfortable circumstances in which such a family finds itself, with the condition in which it would be placed under a social order which excluded Competition—if statisticians, armed with an instrument of sufficient precision, could measure, as with a dynamometer, the relation of a working man’s labour to his enjoyments at two different periods, we should acknowledge that liberty, restrained as it still is, has accomplished202 in his favour a prodigy203 which its very permanency hinders us from remarking. The contingent204 of human efforts which, in relation to a given result, has been annihilated, is truly incalculable. Time was when the artisan’s day’s labour would not have sufficed to procure him the most trumpery205 almanac. At the present day, for a halfpenny, or the fiftieth part of his day’s wages, he can obtain a gazette containing the matter of a volume. The same might be said of clothing, locomotion206, carriage, lighting207, and a multitude of other satisfactions. To what is this result owing? To this, that an enormous proportion of human labour, which had formerly to be paid for, has been handed over to be performed by the gratuitous forces of nature. It is a value annihilated, and to be no longer recompensed. Under the action of Competition, it has been replaced by common and gratuitous utility. And it is worthy208 of remark, that when, in consequence of progress, the price of any commodity comes to fall, [p310] the labour saved to the poor purchaser in obtaining it is always proportionally greater than the labour saved to the rich purchaser. That is demonstrable.
In fine, this constantly increasing current of utilities which labour pours into all the veins209 of the body politic1, and which Competition distributes, is not all summed up in an accession of wealth. It is absorbed, in great part, by the stream of advancing numbers. It resolves itself into an increase of population, according to laws which have an intimate affinity with the subject which now engages us, and which will be explained in another chapter.
Let us now stop for a moment and take a rapid glance at the ground over which we have just travelled.
Man has wants which are unlimited—desires which are insatiable. In order to provide for them he has materials and agents which are furnished to him by nature—faculties, instruments, all things which labour sets in motion. Labour is the resource which has been most equally distributed to all. Each man seeks instinctively, and of necessity, to avail himself to the utmost of the co-operation of natural forces, of talents natural and acquired, and of capital, in order that the result of this co-operation may be a greater amount of utilities produced, or, what comes to the same thing, a greater amount of satisfactions acquired. Thus, the more active co-operation of natural agents, the indefinite development of intelligence, the progressive increase of capital, give rise to this phenomenon (which at first sight seems strange)—that a given quantity of labour furnishes an always increasing amount of utilities, and that each man can, without despoiling210 anyone, obtain a mass of consumable commodities out of all proportion to what his own efforts could have realized.
But this phenomenon, which is the result of the divine harmony which Providence has established in the mechanism of society, would have been detrimental211 to society, by introducing the germ of indefinite inequality, had there not been combined with it a harmony no less admirable, namely, Competition, which is one of the branches of the great law of human solidarity.
In fact, were it possible for an individual, a family, a class, a nation, possessed of certain natural advantages, of an important discovery in manufactures, or of the instruments of production in the shape of accumulated capital, to be set permanently212 free from the law of Competition, it is evident that this individual, this family, this nation, would have for ever the monopoly of an exceptionally high remuneration, at the expense of mankind at large. In what situation should we be if the inhabitants of the tropical [p311] regions, set free from all rivalry213 with each other, could exact from us, in exchange for their sugar, their coffee, their cotton, their spices, not the equivalent of labour equal to their own, but an amount of labour equal to what we must ourselves undergo in order to produce these commodities under our inclement214 skies? What an incalculable distance would separate the various conditions of men, if the race of Cadmus alone could read, if the direct descendants of Triptolemus alone could handle the plough, if printing were confined to the family of Gutenberg, cotton-spinning to the children of Arkwright, and if the posterity215 of Watt216 could alone work the steam engine! Providence has not ordered things thus, but, on the contrary, has placed in the social machine a spring whose power is only less surprising than its simplicity—a spring by the operation of which all productive power, all superiority in manufacturing processes, in a word, all exclusive advantages, slip from the hands of the producer, having remained there, in the shape of exceptional remuneration, only long enough to excite his zeal, and come at length to enlarge the common and gratuitous patrimony of mankind, and resolve themselves into individual enjoyments always progressive, and more and more equally distributed—this spring is Competition. We have already seen its economical effects—and it now remains for us to take a rapid survey of its moral and political consequences. I shall confine myself to the more important of these.
Superficial thinkers have accused Competition of introducing antagonism217 among men. This is true and inevitable, if we consider men only in the capacity of producers, but, regarded from another point of view, as consumers, the matter appears in a very different light. You then see this very Competition binding218 together individuals, families, classes, nations, and races, in the bonds of universal fraternity.
Seeing that the advantages which appear at first to be the property of certain individuals become, by an admirable law of Divine beneficence, the common patrimony of all; seeing that the natural advantages of situation, of fertility, of temperature, of mineral riches, and even of manufacturing aptitude219, slip in a short time from the hands of producers, by reason of their competition with each other, and turn exclusively to the profit of consumers, it follows that there is no country which is not interested in the advancement220 and prosperity of all other countries. Every step of progress made in the East is wealth in perspective for the West. Fuel discovered in the South warms the men of the North. Great Britain makes progress in her spinning mills; [p312] but her capitalists do not alone reap the profit, for the interest of money does not rise; nor do her operatives, for the wages of labour remain the same. In the long-run, it is the Russian, the Frenchman, the Spaniard; in a word, it is the human race, who obtain equal satisfactions at a less expense of labour, or, what comes to the same thing, superior satisfactions with equal labour.
I have spoken only of the advantages—I might say as much of the disadvantages—which affect certain nations and certain regions. The peculiar221 action of Competition is to render general what was before exclusive. It acts exactly on the principle of Insurance. A scourge222 visits the fields of the agriculturist, and the consumers of the bread are the sufferers. An unjust tax is laid upon the vines of France, and this means dear wine for all wine-drinkers. Thus, advantages and disadvantages, which have any permanence, only glance upon individuals, classes, or nations. Their providential destination in the long-run is to affect humanity at large, and elevate or lower the condition of mankind. Hence to envy a certain people the fertility of their soil, or the beauty of their harbours and rivers, or the warmth of their sun, is to overlook the advantages in which we are called to participate. It is to contemn223 the abundance which is offered to us. It is to regret the labour which is saved to us. Hence national jealousies224 are not only perverse225 feelings;—they are absurd. To hurt others is to injure ourselves. To place obstacles in the way of others—tariffs, wars, or workmen’s strikes—is to obstruct226 our own progress. Hence bad passions have their chastisement, just as generous sentiments have their reward. The inevitable sanction of an exact distributive justice addresses itself to men’s interests, enlightens opinion, proclaims and establishes among men these maxims227 of eternal truth: that the useful is one of the aspects of the just; that Liberty is the fairest of social Harmonies; and that Honesty is the best Policy.
Christianity has introduced into the world the grand principle of human fraternity. It addresses itself to our hearts, our feelings, our noble instincts. Political Economy recommends the same principle to our cool judgment; and, exhibiting the connexion of effects with their causes, reconciles in consoling harmony the vigilant228 calculations of interest with the inspirations of the sublimest229 morality.
A second consequence which flows from this doctrine176 is, that society is truly a Community. Messieurs Owen and Cabet may save themselves the trouble of seeking the solution of the great [p313] Communist problem—it is found already—it results not from their arbitrary combinations, but from the organization given by God to man, and to society. Natural forces, expeditive processes, instruments of production, everything is common among men, or has a tendency to become so, everything except pains, labour, individual effort. There is, and there can be, but one inequality—an inequality which Communists the most absolute must admit,—that which results from the inequality of efforts. These efforts are what are exchanged for one another at a price bargained for. All the utility which nature, and the genius of ages, and human foresight230, have implanted in the commodities exchanged, we obtain into the bargain. Reciprocal remunerations have reference only to reciprocal efforts, whether actual under the name of Labour, or preparatory under the name of Capital. Here then is Community in the strictest sense of the word, unless we are to pretend that the personal share of enjoyment should be equal, although the quota231 of labour furnished is not so, which indeed would be the most iniquitous232, the most monstrous233, of inequalities,—I will add, the most fatal; for it would not destroy Competition—it would only give it a retrograde action. We should still compete, but the Competition would be a rivalry of idleness, stupidity, and improvidence234.
In fine, the doctrine—so simple, and, as we think, so true—which we have just developed, takes the great principle of human perfectibility out of the domain of declamation, and transfers it to that of rigorous demonstration235. This internal motive236, which is never at rest in the bosom of the individual, but stirs him up to improve his condition, gives rise to the progress of art, which is nothing else than the progressive co-operation of forces, which from their nature call for no remuneration. To Competition is owing the concession237 to the community of advantages at first individually obtained. The intensity of the labour required for the production of each given result goes on continually diminishing, to the advantage of the human race, which thus sees the circle of its enjoyments and its leisure enlarging from one generation to another, whilst the level of its physical, intellectual, and moral improvement is raised; and by this arrangement, so worthy of our study and of our profound admiration238, we behold239 mankind recovering the position they had lost.
Let me not be misunderstood, however. I do not say that all fraternity, all community, all perfectibility, are comprised and included in Competition. I say only that Competition is allied240 and combined with these three great social dogmas—that it forms part [p314] of them, that it exhibits them, that it is one of the most powerful agents of their realization241.
I have endeavoured to describe the general effects of Competition, and consequently its benefits, for it would be impious to suppose that any great law of nature should be at once hurtful and permanent; but I am far from denying that the action of Competition is accompanied with many hardships and sufferings. It appears to me that the theory which has just been developed explains at once those sufferings, and the inevitable complaints to which they give rise. Since the work of Competition consists in levelling, it must necessarily run counter to all who proudly attempt to rise above the general level. Each producer, in order to obtain the highest price for his labour, endeavours, as we have seen, to retain as long as possible the exclusive use of an agent, a process, or an instrument, of production. Now the proper mission and result of Competition being to withdraw this exclusive use from the individual, in order to make it common property, it is natural that all men, in their capacity of producers, should unite in a concert of maledictions against Competition. They cannot reconcile themselves to Competition otherwise than by taking into account their interests as consumers, and regarding themselves, not as members of a coterie242 or a corporation, but as men.
Political Economy, we must say, has not yet exerted herself sufficiently243 to dissipate this fatal illusion, which has been the source of so much heartburning, calamity, and irritation244, and of so many wars. This science, from a preference not very philosophical245, has exhausted her efforts in analyzing246 the phenomena of production. The very nomenclature of the science, in fact, convenient as it is, is not in harmony with its object. Agriculture, manufactures, commerce, may be an excellent classification, when the object is to describe the processes of art; but that description, however essential in technology, has little connexion with social economy;—I should even say that it is positively247 dangerous. When we have classed men as agriculturists, manufacturers, and merchants, of what can we speak but of their class interests, of those special interests to which Competition is antagonistic, and which are placed in opposition248 to the general good? It is not for the sake of agriculturists that agriculture exists, of manufacturers that we have manufactures, or of merchants that we have exchanges, but in order that men should have at their disposal the greatest amount of commodities of every kind. Consumption, its laws, what favours it, and renders it equitable and moral—that is the interest which is truly social, and which truly affects the human [p315] race. It is the interest of the consumer which constitutes the real object of Political Economy, and upon which the science should concentrate its clearest lights. This, in truth, forms the bond which unites classes, nations, races—it is the principle and explanation of human fraternity. It is with regret, then, that we see Economists expending249 their talents and sagacity on the anatomy250 of production, and throwing into the fag-end of their books, or into supplementary chapters, a few common-places on the phenomena of consumption. Have we not even seen a justly celebrated251 professor suppressing entirely that branch of the science, confining himself to the means, without ever speaking of the result, and banishing252 from his course everything in connexion with the consumption of wealth, as pertaining253, in his opinion, to morals rather than to Political Economy? Can we be surprised that men are more struck with the inconveniences of Competition than with its advantages, since the former affect them specially as producers,—in which character they are constantly considered and talked of; while the latter affect them only in their capacity of consumers,—a capacity which is altogether disregarded and overlooked?
I repeat that I do not deny or ignore, on the contrary I deplore254 as much as any one can, the sufferings attendant on Competition; but is this any reason for shutting our eyes to its advantages? And it is all the more consoling to observe these advantages, inasmuch as I believe Competition, like all the great laws of nature, to be indestructible. Had it been otherwise, it would assuredly have succumbed255 to the universal resistance which all the men who have ever co-operated in the production of commodities since the beginning of the world have offered to it, and more especially it would have perished under the levée en masse of our modern reformers. But if they have been foolish enough to attempt its destruction, they have not been strong enough to effect it.
And what progressive principle, I would ask, is to be found in the world, the beneficent action of which is not mingled256, especially in the beginning, with suffering and misery? The massing together of human beings in vast agglomerations257 is favourable to boldness and independence of thought, but it frequently sets private life free from the wholesome258 restraint of public opinion, and gives shelter to debauchery and crime. Wealth and leisure united give birth to mental cultivation259, but they also give birth to pride and luxury among the rich, and to irritation and covetousness among the poor. The art of printing brings home knowledge and truth to all ranks of society, but it has brought also afflicting260 doubt and subversive261 error. Political liberty has unchained [p316] tempests and revolutions, and has modified the simple manners of primitive262 nations, to such a decree as to induce thinking men to ask themselves whether they would not have preferred tranquillity263 under the cold shade of despotism. Christianity herself has cast the noble seed of love and charity into a soil saturated264 with the blood of martyrs265.
Why has it entered into the designs of Infinite Goodness and Justice that the happiness of one region or of one era should be purchased at the expense of the sufferings of another region or of another era? What is the Divine purpose which is concealed under this great law of solidarity, of which Competition is only one of the mysterious aspects? Human science cannot answer. What we do know is this, that good always goes on increasing, and that evil goes on diminishing. From the beginning of the social state, such as conquest had made it, when there existed only masters and slaves, and the inequality of conditions was extreme, the work of Competition in approximating ranks, fortunes, intelligences, could not be accomplished without inflicting266 individual hardships, the intensity of which, however, as the work proceeded, has gone on diminishing, like the vibrations267 of sound and the oscillations of the pendulum268. To the sufferings yet in reserve for them, men learn every day to oppose two powerful remedies—namely, foresight, which is the fruit of knowledge and experience; and association, which is organized foresight.
In the first part of this work—alas269! too hastily written—I have endeavoured to keep the reader’s attention fixed upon the line of demarcation, always flexible, but always marked, which separates the two regions of the economic world—natural co-operation, and human labour—the bounty of God, and the work of man—the gratuitous, and the onerous270—that which in exchange is remunerated, and that which is transferred without remuneration—aggregate utility, and the fractional and supplementary utility which constitutes value—absolute wealth, and relative wealth—the co-operation of chemical or mechanical forces, constrained271 to aid production by the instruments which render them available, and the just recompense of the labour which has created these instruments themselves—Community and Property.
It is not enough to mark these two orders of phenomena which are so essentially different, it is necessary also to describe their relations, and, if I may so express myself, their harmonious evolutions. I have essayed to explain how the business of Property consists in conquering utility for the human race, and, casting it [p317] into the domain of Community, to move on to new conquests—so that each given effort, and consequently the aggregate of efforts, should continually be delivering over to mankind satisfactions which are always increasing. Human services exchanged, while preserving their relative value, become the vehicle of an always increasing proportion of utility which is gratuitous, and, therefore, common; and in this consists progress. The possessors of value, then, whatever form it assumes, far from usurping272 and monopolizing273 the gifts of God, multiply these gifts, without causing them to lose the character which Providence has affixed274 to them, of being—Gratuitous.
In proportion as the satisfactions which are handed over by progress to the charge of nature fall by that very fact into the domain of Community, they become equal—it being impossible for us even to conceive inequality except in the domain of human services, which are compared, appreciated, and estimated with a view to an exchange; whence it follows that Equality among men is necessarily progressive. It is so, likewise, in another respect, the action of Competition having for its inevitable result to level and equalize the services themselves, and to bring their recompense more and more into proportion with their merit.
Let us now throw a glance back on the ground over which we have passed.
By the light of the theory, the foundation of which has been laid in the present volume, we shall have to investigate:
The relations of man with the Economic phenomena, in his capacity of producer, and in his character of consumer;
The law of Rent;
That of Wages;
That of Credit;
That of Taxation, which, introducing us into the domain of Politics, properly so called, will lead us to compare those services which are private and voluntary with those which are public and compulsory275;
The law of Population.
We shall then be in a situation to solve some practical problems which are still disputed—Free-trade, Machinery, Luxury, Leisure, Association, Organization of Labour, etc.
I hesitate not to say, that the result of this exposition may be expressed beforehand in these terms: The constant approximation of all men towards a level which is always rising—in other terms: Improvement and Equalization; in a single word, Harmony.
Such is the definitive276 result of the arrangements of Providence—of [p318] the great laws of nature—when they act without impediment, when we regard them as they are in themselves, and apart from any disturbance of their action by error and violence. On beholding277 this Harmony, the Economist58 may well exclaim, like the astronomer278 who regards the planetary movements, or the physiologist279 who contemplates280 the structure and arrangement of the human organs—Digitus Dei est hic!
But man is a free agent, and consequently fallible. He is subject to ignorance and to passion. His will, which is liable to err32, enters as an element into the play of the economic laws. He may misunderstand them, forget them, divert them from their purpose. As the physiologist, after admiring the infinite wisdom displayed in the structure and relations of our organs and viscera, studies these organs likewise in their abnormal state when sickly and diseased, we shall have to penetrate281 into a new world—the world of social Disturbances282.
We shall pave the way for this new study by some considerations on man himself. It would be impossible for us to give an account of social evil, of its origin, its effects, its design—of the limits, always more and more contracted, within which it is shut up by its own action (which constitutes what I might almost venture to call a harmonic dissonance), did we not extend our investigation168 to the necessary consequences of Free-Will, to the errors of Self-Interest, which are constantly corrected, and to the great laws of human Responsibility and Solidarity.
We have seen the germ of all the social Harmonies included in these two principles—Property, Liberty. We shall see that all social Dissonances are only the development of these two antagonistic principles—Spoliation, Oppression.
The words Property and Liberty, in fact, express only two aspects of the same idea. In an economical point of view, Liberty is allied to the act of production—Property to the things produced. And since Value has its foundation in the human act, we may conclude that Liberty implies and includes Property. The same relation exists between Oppression and Spoliation.
Liberty! here at length we have the principle of harmony. Oppression! here we have the principle of dissonance. The struggle of these two powers fills the annals of the human race.
And as the design of Oppression is to effect an unjust appropriation283, as it resolves itself into and is summed up in spoliation, it is Spoliation that must form the subject of our inquiry284.
He cannot escape from it but by subjecting himself to the yoke of Labour, which is pain also.
This is the reason why he looks around him, and if he sees that his fellow-man has accumulated wealth, he conceives the thought of appropriating it. Hence comes false property, or Spoliation.
Spoliation! here we have a new element in the economy of society.
From the day when it first made its appearance in the world down to the day when it shall have completely disappeared, if that day ever come, this element has affected287 and will affect profoundly the whole social mechanism; it will disturb, and to the extent of rendering them no longer recognisable, those laws of social harmony which we have endeavoured to discover and describe.
Our duty, then, will not have been accomplished until we have completed the monography of Spoliation.
It may be imagined that we have here to do with an accidental and exceptional fact, a transient derangement288 unworthy of the investigations of science.
But in truth it is not so. On the contrary, Spoliation, in the traditions of families, in the history of nations, in the occupations of individuals, in the physical and intellectual energies of classes, in the schemes and designs of governments, occupies nearly as prominent a place as Property itself.
No; Spoliation is not an ephemeral scourge, affecting accidentally the social mechanism, and which economical science may disregard as exceptional.
The sentence pronounced upon man in the beginning was, In the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread. Whence it appears that effort and satisfaction are indissolubly united, and that the one must be always the recompense of the other. But on all sides we find man revolting against this law, and saying to his brother, Thine be the labour, and mine the fruit of that labour.
Repair to the hut of the savage289 hunter, or to the tent of the nomad290 shepherd, and what spectacle meets your eyes? The wife, lank291, pale, disfigured, affrighted, prematurely292 old, bears the whole burden of the household cares, while the man lounges in idleness. What idea can we form of family Harmonies? The idea has disappeared, for Strength here throws upon Feebleness the weight of labour. And how many ages of civilizing293 effort will be needed to raise the wife from this state of frightful degradation294?
Spoliation, in its most brutal295 form, armed with torch and sword, [p320] fills the annals of the world. Of what names is history made up? Cyrus, Sesostris, Alexander, Scipio, C?sar, Attila, Tamerlane, Mahomet, Pizarro, William the Conqueror296—pure Spoliation from beginning to end in the shape of Conquest. Hers are the laurels297, the monuments, the statues, the triumphal arches, the song of the poet, the intoxicating298 enthusiasm of the fair!
The Conqueror soon finds that he can turn his victories to more profitable account than by putting to death the vanquished299; and Slavery covers the earth. Down to our own times, all over the world this has been the form in which societies have existed, bringing with it hates, resistance, internal struggles, and revolutions. And what is Slavery but organized oppression—organized for the purpose of Spoliation?
But Spoliation not only arms Force against Feebleness—she turns Intelligence against Credulity. What hard-working people in the world has escaped being sweated by sacerdotal theocracies300, Egyptian priests, Greek oracles301, Roman auguries302, Gallic druids, Indian brahmins, muftis, ulemas, bonzes, monks303, ministers, mountebanks, sorcerers, soothsayers,—spoliators of all garbs304 and of all denominations305. Assuming this guise306, Spoliation places the fulcrum307 of her lever in heaven, and sacrilegiously prides herself on the complicity of the gods! She enslaves not men’s limbs only, but their souls. She knows how to impress the iron of slavery as well upon the conscience of Séide65 as upon the forehead of Spartacus—realizing what would seem impossible—Mental Slavery.
Mental Slavery! what a frightful association of words! O Liberty! we have seen thee hunted from country to country, crushed by conquest, groaning308 under slavery, insulted in courts, banished309 from the schools, laughed at in saloons, misunderstood in workshops, denounced in churches. It seems thou shouldst find in thought an inviolable refuge. But if thou art to surrender in this thy last asylum310, what becomes of the hopes of ages, and of what value is human existence?
At length, however, the progressive nature of man causes Spoliation to develop in the society in which it exists, resistance which paralyzes its force, and knowledge which unveils its impostures. But Spoliation does not confess herself conquered for all that; she only becomes more crafty311, and, enveloping312 herself in the forms of government and in a system of checks and counterpoises, she gives birth to Politics, long a prolific313 resource. We then see her usurping the liberty of citizens, the better to get hold of their wealth, [p321] and draining away their wealth to possess herself more surely of their liberty. Private activity passes into the domain of public activity. Everything is transacted314 through functionaries315, and an unintelligent and meddling316 bureaucracy overspreads the land. The public treasury317 becomes a vast reservoir into which labourers pour their savings318, to be immediately distributed among placemen. Transactions are no longer regulated by free bargaining and discussion, and the mutuality319 of services disappears.
In this state of things the true notion of Property is extinguished, and every one appeals to the Law to give his services a factitious value.
We enter then upon the era of privileges. Spoliation, ever improving in subtilty, fortifies320 herself in Monopoly, and takes refuge behind Restrictions. She displaces the natural current of exchanges, and sends capital into artificial channels, and with capital, labour—and with labour, population. She gets painfully produced in the North what is produced with facility in the South; creates precarious classes and branches of industry; substitutes for the gratuitous forces of nature the onerous fatigues321 of labour; cherishes establishments which can sustain no rivalry, and invokes322 against competitors the employment of force; provokes international jealousies; flatters patriotic323 arrogance324; and invents ingenious theories, which make auxiliaries325 of her own dupes. She constantly renders imminent326 industrial crises and bankruptcies327, shakes to its foundation all confidence in the future, all faith in liberty, all consciousness of what is just. At length, when science exposes her misdeeds, she stirs up against science her own victims, by proclaiming a Utopia! and ignores not only the science which places obstacles in her path, but the very idea of any possible science, by this crowning sentence of scepticism—There are no principles!
Under the pressure of suffering, at length the masses rise, and overturn everything which is above them. Government, taxes, legislation, everything is at their mercy, and you imagine perhaps that there is now an end to the reign125 of Spoliation;—that the mutuality of services is about to be established on the only possible or even imaginable basis—Liberty. Undeceive yourself. The fatal idea, alas! has permeated328 the masses, that Property has no other origin, no other sanction, no other legitimacy329, no other foundation, than Law; and then the masses set to work legislatively330 to rob one another. Suffering from the wounds which have been inflicted331 upon them, they undertake to cure each of their members by conceding to him the right to oppress his neighbour, and call [p322] this Solidarity and Fraternity. “You have produced—I have not produced—we are solidaires—let us divide.” “You have something—I have nothing—we are brethren—let us share.” It will be our duty then to examine the improper332 use which has been made in these latter days of the terms association, organization, labour, gratuité du crédit, etc. We shall have to subject them to this test—Do they imply Liberty or Oppression? In other words, are they in unison333 with the great Economical laws, or are they disturbances of those laws?
Spoliation is a phenomenon too universal, too persistent334, to permit us to attribute to it a character purely335 accidental. In this, as in many other matters, we cannot separate the study of natural laws from the study of their Perturbations.
But, it may be said, if spoliation enters necessarily into the play of the social mechanism as a dissonance, how can you venture to assert the Harmony of the Economic laws?
I must repeat here what I have said in another place, namely, that in all which concerns man, a being who is only perfectible because he is imperfect, Harmony consists, not in the absolute absence of evil, but in its gradual diminution336. The social body, like the human body, is provided with a curative force, a vis medicatrix, the laws and infallible power of which it is impossible to study without again exclaiming, Digitus Dei est hic.
点击收听单词发音
1 politic | |
adj.有智虑的;精明的;v.从政 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 odious | |
adj.可憎的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 epithet | |
n.(用于褒贬人物等的)表述形容词,修饰语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 desolating | |
毁坏( desolate的现在分词 ); 极大地破坏; 使沮丧; 使痛苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 dint | |
n.由于,靠;凹坑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 persuasion | |
n.劝说;说服;持有某种信仰的宗派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 avow | |
v.承认,公开宣称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 mischievous | |
adj.调皮的,恶作剧的,有害的,伤人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 cholera | |
n.霍乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 constraint | |
n.(on)约束,限制;限制(或约束)性的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 annihilate | |
v.使无效;毁灭;取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 annihilating | |
v.(彻底)消灭( annihilate的现在分词 );使无效;废止;彻底击溃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 pretext | |
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 counteract | |
vt.对…起反作用,对抗,抵消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 misery | |
n.痛苦,苦恼,苦难;悲惨的境遇,贫苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 declamation | |
n. 雄辩,高调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 confided | |
v.吐露(秘密,心事等)( confide的过去式和过去分词 );(向某人)吐露(隐私、秘密等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 enjoyment | |
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 gratuitously | |
平白 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 gratuitous | |
adj.无偿的,免费的;无缘无故的,不必要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 supplementary | |
adj.补充的,附加的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 intensity | |
n.强烈,剧烈;强度;烈度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 incessant | |
adj.不停的,连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 equilibrium | |
n.平衡,均衡,相称,均势,平静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 err | |
vi.犯错误,出差错 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 imputable | |
adj.可归罪的,可归咎的,可归因的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 curb | |
n.场外证券市场,场外交易;vt.制止,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 curbed | |
v.限制,克制,抑制( curb的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 socialists | |
社会主义者( socialist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 disturbance | |
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 adepts | |
n.专家,能手( adept的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 attests | |
v.证明( attest的第三人称单数 );证实;声称…属实;使宣誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 procure | |
vt.获得,取得,促成;vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 destitute | |
adj.缺乏的;穷困的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 tormented | |
饱受折磨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 infinitely | |
adv.无限地,无穷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 subvert | |
v.推翻;暗中破坏;搅乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 usurp | |
vt.篡夺,霸占;vi.篡位 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 rendering | |
n.表现,描写 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 affinity | |
n.亲和力,密切关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 elasticity | |
n.弹性,伸缩力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 renounce | |
v.放弃;拒绝承认,宣布与…断绝关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 exertion | |
n.尽力,努力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 chimerical | |
adj.荒诞不经的,梦幻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 recipient | |
a.接受的,感受性强的 n.接受者,感受者,容器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 bestowed | |
赠给,授予( bestow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 marvels | |
n.奇迹( marvel的名词复数 );令人惊奇的事物(或事例);不平凡的成果;成就v.惊奇,对…感到惊奇( marvel的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 bosom | |
n.胸,胸部;胸怀;内心;adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 rebuked | |
责难或指责( rebuke的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 sophistry | |
n.诡辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 restriction | |
n.限制,约束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 zeal | |
n.热心,热情,热忱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 espoused | |
v.(决定)支持,拥护(目标、主张等)( espouse的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 manifestation | |
n.表现形式;表明;现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 deserted | |
adj.荒芜的,荒废的,无人的,被遗弃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 simultaneously | |
adv.同时发生地,同时进行地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 copper | |
n.铜;铜币;铜器;adj.铜(制)的;(紫)铜色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 stipulating | |
v.(尤指在协议或建议中)规定,约定,讲明(条件等)( stipulate的现在分词 );规定,明确要求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 expend | |
vt.花费,消费,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 exaction | |
n.强求,强征;杂税 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 vouchsafed | |
v.给予,赐予( vouchsafe的过去式和过去分词 );允诺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 incurably | |
ad.治不好地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 forestalling | |
v.先发制人,预先阻止( forestall的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 pretensions | |
自称( pretension的名词复数 ); 自命不凡; 要求; 权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 appreciation | |
n.评价;欣赏;感谢;领会,理解;价格上涨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 avaricious | |
adj.贪婪的,贪心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 equitable | |
adj.公平的;公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 recur | |
vi.复发,重现,再发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 effaced | |
v.擦掉( efface的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;超越;使黯然失色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 levying | |
征(兵)( levy的现在分词 ); 索取; 发动(战争); 征税 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 elucidate | |
v.阐明,说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 annihilated | |
v.(彻底)消灭( annihilate的过去式和过去分词 );使无效;废止;彻底击溃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 bounty | |
n.慷慨的赠予物,奖金;慷慨,大方;施与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 analogous | |
adj.相似的;类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 paradox | |
n.似乎矛盾却正确的说法;自相矛盾的人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 brook | |
n.小河,溪;v.忍受,容让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 refund | |
v.退还,偿还;n.归还,偿还额,退款 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 incessantly | |
ad.不停地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 meditate | |
v.想,考虑,(尤指宗教上的)沉思,冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 physiology | |
n.生理学,生理机能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 miller | |
n.磨坊主 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 combustion | |
n.燃烧;氧化;骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 baker | |
n.面包师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 procuring | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的现在分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 epidermis | |
n.表皮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 levity | |
n.轻率,轻浮,不稳定,多变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 artistically | |
adv.艺术性地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 avarice | |
n.贪婪;贪心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 impartial | |
adj.(in,to)公正的,无偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 solicitude | |
n.焦虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 controverted | |
v.争论,反驳,否定( controvert的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 aggregate | |
adj.总计的,集合的;n.总数;v.合计;集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 interdicted | |
v.禁止(行动)( interdict的过去式和过去分词 );禁用;限制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 patrimony | |
n.世袭财产,继承物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 pervades | |
v.遍及,弥漫( pervade的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 entailed | |
使…成为必要( entail的过去式和过去分词 ); 需要; 限定继承; 使必需 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 contrived | |
adj.不自然的,做作的;虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 awakens | |
v.(使)醒( awaken的第三人称单数 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 covetousness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 meritorious | |
adj.值得赞赏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 avowed | |
adj.公开声明的,承认的v.公开声明,承认( avow的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 diffusion | |
n.流布;普及;散漫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 fusion | |
n.溶化;熔解;熔化状态,熔和;熔接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 anterior | |
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 unreasonable | |
adj.不讲道理的,不合情理的,过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 emulation | |
n.竞争;仿效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 abate | |
vi.(风势,疼痛等)减弱,减轻,减退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 elevation | |
n.高度;海拔;高地;上升;提高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 sentimental | |
adj.多愁善感的,感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 exhausted | |
adj.极其疲惫的,精疲力尽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 taxation | |
n.征税,税收,税金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 consecrated | |
adj.神圣的,被视为神圣的v.把…奉为神圣,给…祝圣( consecrate的过去式和过去分词 );奉献 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 precarious | |
adj.不安定的,靠不住的;根据不足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 calamity | |
n.灾害,祸患,不幸事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 rankling | |
v.(使)痛苦不已,(使)怨恨不已( rankle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 pauperism | |
n.有被救济的资格,贫困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 harmonious | |
adj.和睦的,调和的,和谐的,协调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 solidarity | |
n.团结;休戚相关 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 impute | |
v.归咎于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 chastisement | |
n.惩罚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 fatality | |
n.不幸,灾祸,天命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 prophesy | |
v.预言;预示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 datum | |
n.资料;数据;已知数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 sinister | |
adj.不吉利的,凶恶的,左边的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 centripetal | |
adj.向心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 puerile | |
adj.幼稚的,儿童的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 antagonistic | |
adj.敌对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 prospects | |
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 impairs | |
v.损害,削弱( impair的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 enjoyments | |
愉快( enjoyment的名词复数 ); 令人愉快的事物; 享有; 享受 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 lengthened | |
(时间或空间)延长,伸长( lengthen的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 apprenticeship | |
n.学徒身份;学徒期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 brute | |
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 strata | |
n.地层(复数);社会阶层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 aspiration | |
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 monopolized | |
v.垄断( monopolize的过去式和过去分词 );独占;专卖;专营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 hieroglyphics | |
n.pl.象形文字 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 concur | |
v.同意,意见一致,互助,同时发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 lapse | |
n.过失,流逝,失效,抛弃信仰,间隔;vi.堕落,停止,失效,流逝;vt.使失效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 procured | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的过去式和过去分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 apotheosis | |
n.神圣之理想;美化;颂扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 epoch | |
n.(新)时代;历元 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 enfranchisement | |
选举权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 laborious | |
adj.吃力的,努力的,不流畅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 prodigy | |
n.惊人的事物,奇迹,神童,天才,预兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 contingent | |
adj.视条件而定的;n.一组,代表团,分遣队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 trumpery | |
n.无价值的杂物;adj.(物品)中看不中用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 locomotion | |
n.运动,移动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 lighting | |
n.照明,光线的明暗,舞台灯光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 veins | |
n.纹理;矿脉( vein的名词复数 );静脉;叶脉;纹理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 despoiling | |
v.掠夺,抢劫( despoil的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 detrimental | |
adj.损害的,造成伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 permanently | |
adv.永恒地,永久地,固定不变地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 rivalry | |
n.竞争,竞赛,对抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 inclement | |
adj.严酷的,严厉的,恶劣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 posterity | |
n.后裔,子孙,后代 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 watt | |
n.瓦,瓦特 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 antagonism | |
n.对抗,敌对,对立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 aptitude | |
n.(学习方面的)才能,资质,天资 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 advancement | |
n.前进,促进,提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 scourge | |
n.灾难,祸害;v.蹂躏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 contemn | |
v.蔑视 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 jealousies | |
n.妒忌( jealousy的名词复数 );妒羡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 perverse | |
adj.刚愎的;坚持错误的,行为反常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 obstruct | |
v.阻隔,阻塞(道路、通道等);n.阻碍物,障碍物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 maxims | |
n.格言,座右铭( maxim的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 sublimest | |
伟大的( sublime的最高级 ); 令人赞叹的; 极端的; 不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 foresight | |
n.先见之明,深谋远虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 quota | |
n.(生产、进出口等的)配额,(移民的)限额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 iniquitous | |
adj.不公正的;邪恶的;高得出奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 improvidence | |
n.目光短浅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 demonstration | |
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 concession | |
n.让步,妥协;特许(权) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 realization | |
n.实现;认识到,深刻了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 coterie | |
n.(有共同兴趣的)小团体,小圈子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 irritation | |
n.激怒,恼怒,生气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 analyzing | |
v.分析;分析( analyze的现在分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析n.分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 expending | |
v.花费( expend的现在分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 anatomy | |
n.解剖学,解剖;功能,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 banishing | |
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 pertaining | |
与…有关系的,附属…的,为…固有的(to) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 deplore | |
vt.哀叹,对...深感遗憾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 succumbed | |
不再抵抗(诱惑、疾病、攻击等)( succumb的过去式和过去分词 ); 屈从; 被压垮; 死 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 mingled | |
混合,混入( mingle的过去式和过去分词 ); 混进,与…交往[联系] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 agglomerations | |
n.成团,结块(agglomeration的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 wholesome | |
adj.适合;卫生的;有益健康的;显示身心健康的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 cultivation | |
n.耕作,培养,栽培(法),养成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 afflicting | |
痛苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 subversive | |
adj.颠覆性的,破坏性的;n.破坏份子,危险份子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 tranquillity | |
n. 平静, 安静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 saturated | |
a.饱和的,充满的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 inflicting | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 vibrations | |
n.摆动( vibration的名词复数 );震动;感受;(偏离平衡位置的)一次性往复振动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 pendulum | |
n.摆,钟摆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 onerous | |
adj.繁重的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 usurping | |
篡夺,霸占( usurp的现在分词 ); 盗用; 篡夺,篡权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 monopolizing | |
v.垄断( monopolize的现在分词 );独占;专卖;专营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 affixed | |
adj.[医]附着的,附着的v.附加( affix的过去式和过去分词 );粘贴;加以;盖(印章) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 compulsory | |
n.强制的,必修的;规定的,义务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 beholding | |
v.看,注视( behold的现在分词 );瞧;看呀;(叙述中用于引出某人意外的出现)哎哟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 astronomer | |
n.天文学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 physiologist | |
n.生理学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 contemplates | |
深思,细想,仔细考虑( contemplate的第三人称单数 ); 注视,凝视; 考虑接受(发生某事的可能性); 深思熟虑,沉思,苦思冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 penetrate | |
v.透(渗)入;刺入,刺穿;洞察,了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 disturbances | |
n.骚乱( disturbance的名词复数 );打扰;困扰;障碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 appropriation | |
n.拨款,批准支出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 yoke | |
n.轭;支配;v.给...上轭,连接,使成配偶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 detests | |
v.憎恶,嫌恶,痛恨( detest的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 derangement | |
n.精神错乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 nomad | |
n.游牧部落的人,流浪者,游牧民 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 lank | |
adj.瘦削的;稀疏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 prematurely | |
adv.过早地,贸然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 civilizing | |
v.使文明,使开化( civilize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 degradation | |
n.降级;低落;退化;陵削;降解;衰变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 conqueror | |
n.征服者,胜利者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 laurels | |
n.桂冠,荣誉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 intoxicating | |
a. 醉人的,使人兴奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 theocracies | |
n.神权政治(国家)( theocracy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 oracles | |
神示所( oracle的名词复数 ); 神谕; 圣贤; 哲人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 auguries | |
n.(古罗马)占卜术,占卜仪式( augury的名词复数 );预兆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 monks | |
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 garbs | |
vt.装扮(garb的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 denominations | |
n.宗派( denomination的名词复数 );教派;面额;名称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 guise | |
n.外表,伪装的姿态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 fulcrum | |
n.杠杆支点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 groaning | |
adj. 呜咽的, 呻吟的 动词groan的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 banished | |
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 asylum | |
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 crafty | |
adj.狡猾的,诡诈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 enveloping | |
v.包围,笼罩,包住( envelop的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 prolific | |
adj.丰富的,大量的;多产的,富有创造力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 transacted | |
v.办理(业务等)( transact的过去式和过去分词 );交易,谈判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 functionaries | |
n.公职人员,官员( functionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 meddling | |
v.干涉,干预(他人事务)( meddle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 mutuality | |
n.相互关系,相互依存 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 fortifies | |
筑防御工事于( fortify的第三人称单数 ); 筑堡于; 增强; 强化(食品) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 fatigues | |
n.疲劳( fatigue的名词复数 );杂役;厌倦;(士兵穿的)工作服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 invokes | |
v.援引( invoke的第三人称单数 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 arrogance | |
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 auxiliaries | |
n.助动词 ( auxiliary的名词复数 );辅助工,辅助人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 imminent | |
adj.即将发生的,临近的,逼近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 bankruptcies | |
n.破产( bankruptcy的名词复数 );倒闭;彻底失败;(名誉等的)完全丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 permeated | |
弥漫( permeate的过去式和过去分词 ); 遍布; 渗入; 渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 legitimacy | |
n.合法,正当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 legislatively | |
adv.立法地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 unison | |
n.步调一致,行动一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 persistent | |
adj.坚持不懈的,执意的;持续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 diminution | |
n.减少;变小 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |