Man naturally is in a state of entire destitution2.
Between this state and the satisfying of his wants, there exists a multitude of obstacles which it is the object of labor3 to surmount4. It is interesting to seek how and why he could have been led to look even upon these obstacles to his happiness as the cause of it.
I wish to take a journey of some hundred miles. But, between the point of my departure and my destination, there are interposed, mountains, rivers, swamps, forests, robbers—in a word, obstacles; and to conquer these obstacles, it is necessary that I should bestow5 much labor and great efforts in opposing them;—or, what is the same thing, if others do it for me, I must pay them the value of their exertions6. It is evident that I should have been better off had these obstacles never existed.
Through the journey of life, in the long series of days from the cradle to the tomb, man has many difficulties to oppose him in his progress. Hunger, thirst, sickness, heat, cold, are so many obstacles scattered7 along his road. In a state of isolation8, he would be obliged to combat them all by hunting, fishing, agriculture, spinning, weaving, architecture, etc., and it is very evident that it would be better for him that these difficulties should exist to a less degree, or even not at all. In a state of society he is not obliged, personally, to struggle with each of these obstacles, but others do it for him; and he, in return, must remove some one of them for the benefit of his fellow-men.
Again it is evident, that, considering mankind as a whole, it would be better for society that these obstacles should be as weak and as few as possible.
But if we examine closely and in detail the phenomena9 of society, and the private interests of men as modified by exchange of produce, we perceive, without difficulty, how it has happened that wants have been confounded with riches, and the obstacle with the cause.
The separation of occupations, which results from the habits of exchange, causes each man, instead of struggling against all surrounding obstacles to combat only one; the effort being made not for himself alone, but for the benefit of his fellows, who, in their turn, render a similar service to him.
Now, it hence results, that this man looks upon the obstacle which he has made it his profession to combat for the benefit of others, as the immediate10 cause of his riches. The greater, the more serious, the more stringent11 may be this obstacle, the more he is remunerated for the conquering of it, by those who are relieved by his labors12.
A physician, for instance, does not busy himself in baking his bread, or in manufacturing his clothing and his instruments; others do it for him, and he, in return, combats the maladies with which his patients are afflicted13. The more dangerous and frequent these maladies are, the more others are willing, the more, even, are they forced, to work in his service. Disease, then, which is an obstacle to the happiness of mankind, becomes to him the source of his comforts. The reasoning of all producers is, in what concerns themselves, the same. As the doctor draws his profits from disease, so does the ship owner from the obstacle called distance; the agriculturist from that named hunger; the cloth manufacturer from cold; the schoolmaster lives upon ignorance, the jeweler upon vanity, the lawyer upon quarrels, the notary14 upon breach15 of faith. Each profession has then an immediate interest in the continuation, even in the extension, of the particular obstacle to which its attention has been directed.
Theorists hence go on to found a system upon these individual interests, and say: Wants are riches: Labor is riches: The obstacle to well-being16 is well-being: To multiply obstacles is to give food to industry.
Then comes the statesman;—and as the developing and propagating of obstacles is the developing and propagating of riches, what more natural than that he should bend his efforts to that point? He says, for instance: If we prevent a large importation of iron, we create a difficulty in procuring17 it. This obstacle severely18 felt, obliges individuals to pay, in order to relieve themselves from it. A certain number of our citizens, giving themselves up to the combating of this obstacle, will thereby19 make their fortunes. In proportion, too, as the obstacle is great, and the mineral scarce, inaccessible20, and of difficult and distant transportation, in the same proportion will be the number of laborers21 maintained by the various branches of this industry.
Here are men who are at a loss how to dispose of their wine-harvest. This is an obstacle which other men set about removing for them by the manufacture of casks. It is fortunate, say our statesmen, that this obstacle exists, since it occupies a portion of the labor of the nation, and enriches a certain number of our citizens. But here is presented to us an ingenious machine, which cuts down the oak, squares it, makes it into staves, and, gathering23 these together, forms them into casks. The obstacle is thus diminished, and with it the profits of the coopers. We must prevent this. Let us proscribe24 the machine!
To sift25 thoroughly26 this sophism, it is sufficient to remember that human labor is not an end, but a means. It is never without employment. If one obstacle is removed, it seizes another, and mankind is delivered from two obstacles by the same effort which was at first necessary for one. If the labor of coopers becomes useless, it must take another direction. But with what, it may be asked, will they be remunerated? Precisely27 with what they are at present remunerated. For if a certain quantity of labor becomes free from its original occupation, to be otherwise disposed of, a corresponding quantity of wages must thus also become free. To maintain that human labor can end by wanting employment, it would be necessary to prove that mankind will cease to encounter obstacles. In such a case, labor would be not only impossible, it would be superfluous28. We should have nothing to do, because we should be all-powerful, and our fiat29 alone would satisfy at once our wants and our desires.
点击收听单词发音
1 sophism | |
n.诡辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 destitution | |
n.穷困,缺乏,贫穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 surmount | |
vt.克服;置于…顶上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 bestow | |
v.把…赠与,把…授予;花费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 exertions | |
n.努力( exertion的名词复数 );费力;(能力、权力等的)运用;行使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 isolation | |
n.隔离,孤立,分解,分离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 stringent | |
adj.严厉的;令人信服的;银根紧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 labors | |
v.努力争取(for)( labor的第三人称单数 );苦干;详细分析;(指引擎)缓慢而困难地运转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 notary | |
n.公证人,公证员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 breach | |
n.违反,不履行;破裂;vt.冲破,攻破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 well-being | |
n.安康,安乐,幸福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 procuring | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的现在分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 inaccessible | |
adj.达不到的,难接近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 laborers | |
n.体力劳动者,工人( laborer的名词复数 );(熟练工人的)辅助工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 gathering | |
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 proscribe | |
v.禁止;排斥;放逐,充军;剥夺公权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 sift | |
v.筛撒,纷落,详察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 superfluous | |
adj.过多的,过剩的,多余的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 fiat | |
n.命令,法令,批准;vt.批准,颁布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |