"Assuredly," said Mr. Gauthier de Roumilly, lately, "assuredly no one wishes to call up from their graves the defunct6 theories of the balance of trade." And yet Mr. Gauthier, after giving this passing blow to error, goes on immediately afterwards, and for two hours consecutively7, to reason as though this error were a truth.
Give me Mr. Lestiboudois. Here we have a consistent reasoner! a logical arguer! There is nothing in his conclusions which cannot be found in his premises8. He asks nothing in practice which he does not justify9 in theory. His principles may perchance be false, and this is the point in question. But he has a principle. He believes, he proclaims aloud, that if France gives ten to receive fifteen, she loses five; and surely, with such a belief, nothing is more natural than that he should make laws consistent with it.
He says: "What it is important to remark, is, that constantly the amount of importation is augmenting10, and surpassing that of exportation. Every year France buys more foreign produce, and sells less of its own produce. This can be proved by figures. In 1842, we see the importation exceed the exportation by two hundred millions. This appears to me to prove, in the clearest manner, that national labor11 is not sufficiently12 protected, that we are provided by foreign labor, and that the competition of our rivals oppresses our industry. The law in question, appears to me to be a consecration13 of the fact, that our political economists15 have assumed a false position in declaring, that in proportion to produce bought, there is always a corresponding quantity sold. It is evident that purchases may be made, not with the habitual16 productions of a country, not with its revenue, not with the results of actual labor, but with its capital, with the accumulated savings17 which should serve for reproduction. A country may spend, dissipate its profits and savings, may impoverish18 itself, and by the consumption of its national capital, progress gradually to its ruin. This is precisely19 what we are doing. We give, every year, two hundred millions to foreign nations."
Well! here, at least, is a man whom we can understand. There is no hypocrisy20 in this language. The balance of trade is here clearly maintained and defended. France imports two hundred millions more than she exports. Then France loses two hundred millions yearly. And the remedy? It is to check importation. The conclusion is perfectly21 consistent.
It is, then, with Mr. Lestiboudois that we will argue, for how is it possible to do so with Mr. Gauthier? If you say to the latter, the balance of trade is a mistake, he will answer, So I have declared it in my exordium. If you exclaim, But it is a truth, he will say, Thus I have classed it in my conclusions.
Political economists may blame me for arguing with Mr. Lestiboudois. To combat the balance of trade, is, they say, neither more nor less than to fight against a windmill.
But let us be on our guard. The balance of trade is neither so old, nor so sick, nor so dead, as Mr. Gauthier is pleased to imagine; for all the legislature, Mr. Gauthier himself included, are associated by their votes with the theory of Mr. Lestiboudois.
However, not to fatigue22 the reader, I will not seek to investigate too closely this theory, but will content myself with subjecting it to the experience of facts.
It is constantly alleged23 in opposition24 to our principles, that they are good only in theory. But, gentlemen, do you believe that merchants' books are good in practice? It does appear to me that if there is any thing which can have a practical authority, when the object is to prove profit and loss, that this must be commercial accounts. We cannot suppose that all the merchants of the world, for centuries back, should have so little understood their own affairs, as to have kept their books in such a manner as to represent gains as losses, and losses as gains. Truly it would be easier to believe that Mr. Lestiboudois is a bad political economist14.
A merchant, one of my friends, having had two business transactions, with very different results, I have been curious to compare on this subject the accounts of the counter with those of the custom-house, interpreted by Mr. Lestiboudois with the sanction of our six hundred legislators.
Mr. T ... despatched from Havre a vessel25, freighted, for the United States, with French merchandise, principally Parisian articles, valued at 200,000 francs. Such was the amount entered at the custom-house. The cargo26, on its arrival at New Orleans, had paid ten per cent. expenses, and was liable to thirty per cent. duties; which raised its value to 280,000 francs. It was sold at twenty per cent. profit on its original value, which being 40,000 francs, the price of sale was 320,000 francs, which the assignee converted into cotton. This cotton, again, had to pay for expenses of transportation, insurance, commissions, etc., ten per cent.: so that when the return cargo arrived at Havre, its value had risen to 352,000 francs, and it was thus entered at the custom-house. Finally, Mr. T ... realized again on this return cargo twenty per cent. profits; amounting to 70,400 francs. The cotton thus sold for the sum of 422,400 francs.
If Mr. Lestiboudois requires it, I will send him an extract from the books of Mr. T ... He will there see, credited to the account of profit and loss, that is to say, set down as gained, two sums; the one of 40,000, the other of 70,000 francs, and Mr. T ... feels perfectly certain that as regards these, there is no mistake in his accounts.
Now what conclusion does Mr. Lestiboudois draw from the sums entered into the custom-house, in this operation? He thence learns that France has exported 200,000 francs, and imported 352,000; from whence the honorable deputy concludes "that she has spent, dissipated the profits of her previous savings; that she is impoverishing27 herself and progressing to her ruin; and that she has squandered28 on a foreign nation 152,000 francs of her capital."
Some time after this transaction, Mr. T ... despatched another vessel, again freighted with domestic produce, to the amount of 200,000 francs. But the vessel foundered29 after leaving the port, and Mr. T ... had only farther to inscribe30 on his books two little items, thus worded:
"Profit and loss due to sundries, 200,000 francs, for final and total loss of cargo."
In the meantime the custom-house inscribed32 200,000 francs upon its list of exportations, and as there can of course be nothing to balance this entry on the list of importations, it hence follows that Mr. Lestiboudois and the Chamber33 must see in this wreck34 a clear profit to France of 200,000 francs.
We may draw hence yet another conclusion, viz.: that according to the Balance of Trade theory, France has an exceedingly simple manner of constantly doubling her capital. It is only necessary, to accomplish this, that she should, after entering into the custom-house her articles for exportation, cause them to be thrown into the sea. By this course, her exportations can speedily be made to equal her capital; importations will be nothing, and our gain will be, all which the ocean will have swallowed up.
You are joking, the protectionists will reply. You know that it is impossible that we should utter such absurdities35. Nevertheless, I answer, you do utter them, and what is more, you give them life, you exercise them practically upon your fellow citizens, as much, at least, as is in your power to do.
The truth is, that the theory of the Balance of Trade should be precisely reversed. The profits accruing36 to the nation from any foreign commerce should be calculated by the overplus of the importation above the exportation. This overplus, after the deduction37 of expenses, is the real gain. Here we have the true theory, and it is one which leads directly to freedom in trade. I now, gentlemen, abandon you this theory, as I have done all those of the preceding chapters. Do with it as you please, exaggerate it as you will; it has nothing to fear. Push it to the farthest extreme; imagine, if it so please you, that foreign nations should inundate38 us with useful produce of every description, and ask nothing in return; that our importations should be infinite, and our exportations nothing. Imagine all this, and still I defy you to prove that we will be the poorer in consequence.
点击收听单词发音
1 adversaries | |
n.对手,敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 triumphant | |
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 defunct | |
adj.死亡的;已倒闭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 consecutively | |
adv.连续地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 premises | |
n.建筑物,房屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 augmenting | |
使扩张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 consecration | |
n.供献,奉献,献祭仪式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 habitual | |
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 impoverish | |
vt.使穷困,使贫困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 fatigue | |
n.疲劳,劳累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 vessel | |
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 cargo | |
n.(一只船或一架飞机运载的)货物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 impoverishing | |
v.使(某人)贫穷( impoverish的现在分词 );使(某物)贫瘠或恶化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 squandered | |
v.(指钱,财产等)浪费,乱花( squander的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 foundered | |
v.创始人( founder的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 inscribe | |
v.刻;雕;题写;牢记 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 divers | |
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 inscribed | |
v.写,刻( inscribe的过去式和过去分词 );内接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 wreck | |
n.失事,遇难;沉船;vt.(船等)失事,遇难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 absurdities | |
n.极端无理性( absurdity的名词复数 );荒谬;谬论;荒谬的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 accruing | |
v.增加( accrue的现在分词 );(通过自然增长)产生;获得;(使钱款、债务)积累 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 deduction | |
n.减除,扣除,减除额;推论,推理,演绎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 inundate | |
vt.淹没,泛滥,压倒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |