Sincere men, taking upon the subject of political economy the point of view of producers, have arrived at this double formula:
"A government should dispose of consumers subject to its laws in favor of home industry."
"It should subject to its laws foreign consumers, in order to dispose of them in favor of home industry."
Both rest upon this proposition, called the Balance of Trade, that
"A people is impoverished2 by importations and enriched by exportations."
For if every foreign purchase is a tribute paid, a loss, nothing can be more natural than to restrain, even to prohibit importations.
And if every foreign sale is a tribute received, a gain, nothing more natural than to create outlets, even by force.
Protective System; Colonial System.—These are only two aspects of the same theory. To prevent our citizens from buying from foreigners, and to force foreigners to buy from our citizens. Two consequences of one identical principle.
It is impossible not to perceive that according to this doctrine3, if it be true, the welfare of a country depends upon monopoly or domestic spoliation, and upon conquest or foreign spoliation.
Let us take a glance into one of these huts, perched upon the side of our Pyrenean range.
The father of a family has received the little wages of his labor4; but his half-naked children are shivering before a biting northern blast, beside a fireless hearth5, and an empty table. There is wool, and wood, and corn, on the other side of the mountain, but these are forbidden to them; for the other side of the mountain is not France. Foreign wood must not warm the hearth of the poor shepherd; his children must not taste the bread of Biscay, nor cover their numbed6 limbs with the wool of Navarre. It is thus that the general good requires!
The disposing by law of consumers, forcing them to the support of home industry, is an encroachment7 upon their liberty, the forbidding of an action (mutual8 exchange) which is in no way opposed to morality! In a word, it is an act of injustice9.
But this, it is said, is necessary, or else home labor will be arrested, and a severe blow will be given to public prosperity.
Thus then we must come to the melancholy10 conclusion, that there is a radical11 incompatibility12 between the Just and the Useful.
Again, if each people is interested in selling, and not in buying, a violent action and reaction must form the natural state of their mutual relations; for each will seek to force its productions upon all, and all will seek to repulse13 the productions of each.
A sale in fact implies a purchase, and since, according to this doctrine, to sell is beneficial, and to buy injurious, every international transaction must imply the benefiting of one people by the injuring of another.
But men are invincibly14 inclined to what they feel to be advantageous15 to themselves, while they also, instinctively16 resist that which is injurious. From hence then we must infer that each nation bears within itself a natural force of expansion, and a not less natural force of resistance, which are equally injurious to all others. In other words, antagonism17 and war are the natural state of human society.
Thus then the theory in discussion resolves itself into the two following axioms. In the affairs of a nation,
Utility is incompatible18 with the internal administration of justice.
Utility is incompatible with the maintenance of external peace.
Well, what embarrasses and confounds me is, to explain how any writer upon public rights, any statesman who has sincerely adopted a doctrine of which the leading principle is so antagonistic19 to other incontestable principles, can enjoy one moment's repose20 or peace of mind.
For myself, if such were my entrance upon the threshold of science, if I did not clearly perceive that Liberty, Utility, Justice, and Peace, are not only compatible, but closely connected, even identical, I would endeavor to forget all I have learned; I would say:
"Can it be possible that God can allow men to attain21 prosperity only through injustice and war? Can he so direct the affairs of mortals, that they can only renounce22 war and injustice by, at the same time, renouncing23 their own welfare?
"Am I not deceived by the false lights of a science which can lead me to the horrible blasphemy24 implied in this alternative, and shall I dare to take it upon myself to propose this as a basis for the legislation of a great people? When I find a long succession of illustrious and learned men, whose researches in the same science have led to more consoling results; who, after having devoted25 their lives to its study, affirm that through it they see Liberty and Utility indissolubly linked with Justice and Peace, and find these great principles destined26 to continue on through eternity27 in infinite parallels, have they not in their favor the presumption28 which results from all that we know of the goodness and wisdom of God as manifested in the sublime29 harmony of material creation? Can I lightly believe, in opposition30 to such a presumption and such imposing31 authorities, that this same God has been pleased to put disagreement and antagonism in the laws of the moral world? No; before I can believe that all social principles oppose, shock and neutralize32 each other; before I can think them in constant, anarchical and eternal conflict; above all, before I can seek to impose upon my fellow-citizens the impious system to which my reasonings have led me, I must retrace33 my steps, hoping, perchance, to find some point where I have wandered from my road."
And if, after a sincere investigation34 twenty times repeated, I should still arrive at the frightful35 conclusion that I am driven to choose between the Desirable and the Good, I would reject the science, plunge36 into a voluntary ignorance, above all, avoid participation37 in the affairs of my country, and leave to others the weight and responsibility of so fearful a choice.
点击收听单词发音
1 outlets | |
n.出口( outlet的名词复数 );经销店;插座;廉价经销店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 impoverished | |
adj.穷困的,无力的,用尽了的v.使(某人)贫穷( impoverish的过去式和过去分词 );使(某物)贫瘠或恶化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 hearth | |
n.壁炉炉床,壁炉地面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 numbed | |
v.使麻木,使麻痹( numb的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 encroachment | |
n.侵入,蚕食 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 incompatibility | |
n.不兼容 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 repulse | |
n.击退,拒绝;vt.逐退,击退,拒绝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 invincibly | |
adv.难战胜地,无敌地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 advantageous | |
adj.有利的;有帮助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 antagonism | |
n.对抗,敌对,对立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 incompatible | |
adj.不相容的,不协调的,不相配的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 antagonistic | |
adj.敌对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 attain | |
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 renounce | |
v.放弃;拒绝承认,宣布与…断绝关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 renouncing | |
v.声明放弃( renounce的现在分词 );宣布放弃;宣布与…决裂;宣布摒弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 blasphemy | |
n.亵渎,渎神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 presumption | |
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 sublime | |
adj.崇高的,伟大的;极度的,不顾后果的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 neutralize | |
v.使失效、抵消,使中和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 retrace | |
v.折回;追溯,探源 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 plunge | |
v.跳入,(使)投入,(使)陷入;猛冲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |