Of palisadoes, frontiers, parapets,
"Henry IV.," Part I., Act ii., Sc.3.
It may at first seem that a chapter wholly devoted3 to military considerations is inappropriate to a book which, if it is to enjoy any measure of success, must be read by many unconnected with the army. But I remember that in these days it is necessary for every one, who means to be well informed, to have a superficial knowledge of every one else's business. Encouraged also by what Mr. Gladstone has called "the growing militarism of the times," I hope that, avoiding technicalities, it may be of some general interest to glance for a moment at the frontier war from a purely4 professional point of view. My observations must be taken as applying to the theatre of the war I have described, but I do not doubt that many of them will be applicable to the whole frontier.
The first and most important consideration is transport. Nobody who has not seen for himself can realise what a great matter this is. I well recall my amazement5, when watching a camel convoy6 more than a mile and a half long, escorted by half a battalion7 of infantry8. I was informed that it contained only two days' supplies for one brigade. People talk lightly of moving columns hither and thither9, as if they were mobile groups of men, who had only to march about the country and fight the enemy wherever found, and very few understand that an army is a ponderous10 mass which drags painfully after it a long chain of advanced depots12, stages, rest camps, and communications, by which it is securely fastened to a stationary13 base. In these valleys, where wheeled traffic is impossible, the difficulties and cost of moving supplies are enormous; and as none, or very few, are to be obtained within the country, the consideration is paramount14. Mule15 transport is for many reasons superior to camel transport. The mule moves faster and can traverse more difficult ground. He is also more hardy16 and keeps in better condition. When Sir Bindon Blood began his advance against the Mohmands he equipped his 2nd Brigade entirely17 with mules18. It was thus far more mobile, and was available for any rapid movement that might become necessary. To mix the two—camels and mules—appears to combine the disadvantages of both, and destroy the superiority of either.
I have already described the Indian service camp and the "sniping" without which no night across the frontier could be complete. I shall therefore only notice two points, which were previously20 omitted, as they looked suspiciously technical. As the night firing is sometimes varied21 by more serious attacks, and even actual assaults and sword rushes, it is thought advisable to have the ditch of the entrenchment22 towards the enemy. Modern weapons notwithstanding, the ultimate appeal is to the bayonet, and the advantage of being on the higher ground is then considerable.
When a battery forms part of the line round a camp, infantry soldiers should be placed between the guns. Artillery24 officers do not like this; but, though they are very good fellows, there are some things in which it is not well to give way to them. Every one is prone25 to over-estimate the power of his arm.
In the Mamund Valley all the fighting occurred in capturing villages, which lay in rocky and broken ground in the hollows of the mountains, and were defended by a swarm26 of active riflemen. Against the quickly moving figures of the enemy it proved almost useless to fire volleys. The tribesmen would dart27 from rock to rock, exposing themselves only for an instant, and before the attention of a section could be directed to them and the rifles aimed, the chance and the target would have vanished together. Better results were obtained by picking out good shots and giving them permission to fire when they saw their opportunity, without waiting for the word of command. But speaking generally, infantry should push on to the attack with the bayonet without wasting much time in firing, which can only result in their being delayed under the fire of a well-posted enemy.
After the capture and destruction of the village, the troops had always to return to camp, and a retirement28 became necessary. The difficulty of executing such an operation in the face of an active and numerous enemy, armed with modern rifles, was great. I had the opportunity of witnessing six of these retirements29 from the rear companies. Five were fortunate and one was disastrous30, but all were attended with loss, and as experienced officers have informed me, with danger. As long as no one is hit everything is successful, but as soon as a few men are wounded, the difficulties begin. No sooner has a point been left—a knoll31, a patch of corn, some rocks, or any other incident of ground—than it is seized by the enemy. With their excellent rifles, they kill or wound two or three of the retiring company, whose somewhat close formation makes them a good mark. Now, in civilised war these wounded would be left on the ground, and matters arranged next day by parley32. But on the frontier, where no quarter is asked or given, to carry away the wounded is a sacred duty. It is also the strenuous33 endeavour of every regiment34 to carry away their dead. The vile35 and horrid36 mutilations which the tribesmen inflict37 on all bodies that fall into their hands, and the insults to which they expose them, add, to unphilosophic minds, another terror to death. Now, it takes at least four men, and very often more, to carry away a body. Observe the result. Every man hit, means five rifles withdrawn38 from the firing line. Ten men hit, puts a company out of action, as far as fighting power is concerned. The watchful40 enemy press. The groups of men bearing the injured are excellent targets. Presently the rear-guard is encumbered41 with wounded. Then a vigorous charge with swords is pushed home. Thus, a disaster occurs.
Watching the progress of events, sometimes from one regiment, sometimes from another, I observed several ways by which these difficulties could be avoided. The Guides, long skilled in frontier war, were the most valuable instructors42. As the enemy seize every point as soon as it is left, all retirements should be masked by leaving two or three men behind from each company. These keep up a brisk fire, and after the whole company have taken up a new position, or have nearly done so, they run back and join them. Besides this, the fire of one company in retiring should always be arranged to cover another, and at no moment in a withdrawal43 should the firing ever cease. The covering company should be actually in position before the rear company begins to move, and should open fire at once. I was particularly struck on 18th September by the retirement of the Guides Infantry. These principles were carried out with such skill and thoroughness that, though the enemy pressed severely44, only one man was wounded. The way in which Major Campbell, the commanding officer, availed himself of the advantages of retiring down two spurs and bringing a cross fire to bear to cover the alternate retirements, resembled some intricate chess problem, rather than a military evolution.
The power of the new Lee-Metford rifle with the new Dum-Dum bullet—it is now called, though not officially, the "ek-dum" [Hindustani for "at once."] bullet—is tremendous. The soldiers who have used it have the utmost confidence in their weapon. Up to 500 yards there is no difficulty about judging the range, as it shoots quite straight, or, technically45 speaking, has a flat trajectory46. This is of the greatest value. Of the bullet it may be said, that its stopping power is all that could be desired. The Dum-Dum bullet, though not explosive, is expansive. The original Lee-Metford bullet was a pellet of lead covered by a nickel case with an opening at the base. In the improved bullet this outer case has been drawn39 backward, making the hole in the base a little smaller and leaving the lead at the tip exposed. The result is a wonderful and from the technical point of view a beautiful machine. On striking a bone this causes the bullet to "set up" or spread out, and it then tears and splinters everything before it, causing wounds which in the body must be generally mortal and in any limb necessitate47 amputation48. Continental49 critics have asked whether such a bullet is not a violation50 of the Geneva or St. Petersburg Conventions; but no clause of these international agreements forbids expansive bullets, and the only provision on the subject is that shells less than a certain size shall not be employed. I would observe that bullets are primarily intended to kill, and that these bullets do their duty most effectually, without causing any more pain to those struck by them, than the ordinary lead variety. As the enemy obtained some Lee-Metford rifles and Dum-Dum ammunition51 during the progress of the fighting, information on this latter point is forthcoming. The sensation is described as similar to that produced by any bullet—a violent numbing52 blow, followed by a sense of injury and weakness, but little actual pain at the time. Indeed, now-a-days, very few people are so unfortunate as to suffer much pain from wounds, except during the period of recovery. A man is hit. In a quarter of an hour, that is to say, before the shock has passed away and the pain begins, he is usually at the dressing53 station. Here he is given morphia injections, which reduce all sensations to a uniform dullness. In this state he remains54 until he is placed under chloroform and operated on.
The necessity for having the officers in the same dress as the men, was apparent to all who watched the operations. The conspicuous55 figure which a British officer in his helmet presented in contrast to the native soldiers in their turbans, drew a well-aimed fire in his direction. Of course, in British regiments56, the difference is not nearly so marked. Nevertheless, at close quarters the keen-eyed tribesmen always made an especial mark of the officers, distinguishing them chiefly, I think, by the fact that they do not carry rifles. The following story may show how evident this was:—
When the Buffs were marching down to Panjkora, they passed the Royal West Kent coming up to relieve them at Inayat Kila. A private in the up-going regiment asked a friend in the Buffs what it was like at the front. "Oh," replied the latter, "you'll be all right so long as you don't go near no officers, nor no white stones." Whether the advice was taken is not recorded, but it was certainly sound, for three days later—on 30th September—in those companies of the Royal West Kent regiment that were engaged in the village of Agrah, eight out of eleven officers were hit or grazed by bullets.
The fatigues57 experienced by troops in mountain warfare58 are so great, that every effort has to be made to lighten the soldier's load. At the same time the more ammunition he carries on his person the better. Mules laden59 with cartridge-boxes are very likely to be shot, and fall into the hands of the enemy. In this manner over 6000 rounds were lost on the 16th of September by the two companies of Sikhs whose retirement I have described.
The thick leather belts, pouches60, and valise equipment of British infantry are unnecessarily heavy. I have heard many officers suggest having them made of web. The argument against this is that the web wears out. That objection could be met by having a large supply of these equipments at the base and issuing fresh ones as soon as the old were unfit for use. It is cheaper to wear out belts than soldiers.
Great efforts should be made to give the soldier a piece of chocolate, a small sausage, or something portable and nutritious61 to carry with him to the field. In a war of long marches, of uncertain fortunes, of retirements often delayed and always pressed, there have been many occasions when regiments and companies have unexpectedly had to stop out all night without food. It is well to remember that the stomach governs the world.
The principle of concentrating artillery has long been admitted in Europe. Sir Bindon Blood is the first general who has applied62 it to mountain warfare in India. It had formerly63 been the custom to use the guns by twos and threes. As we have seen, at the action of Landakai, the Malakand Field Force had eighteen guns in action, of which twelve were in one line. The fire of this artillery drove the enemy, who were in great strength and an excellent position, from the ground. The infantry attack was accomplished64 with hardly any loss, and a success was obtained at a cost of a dozen lives which would have been cheap at a hundred.
After this, it may seem strange if I say that the artillery fire in the Mamund Valley did very little execution. It is nevertheless a fact. The Mamunds are a puny65 tribe, but they build their houses in the rocks; and against sharpshooters in broken ground, guns can do little. Through field-glasses it was possible to see the enemy dodging66 behind their rocks, whenever the puffs67 of smoke from the guns told them that a shell was on its way. Perhaps smokeless powder would have put a stop to this. But in any case, the targets presented to the artillery were extremely bad.
Where they really were of great service, was not so much in killing68 the enemy, but in keeping them from occupying certain spurs and knolls69. On 30th September, when the Royal West Kent and the 31st Punjaub Infantry were retiring under considerable pressure, the British Mountain Battery moved to within 700 yards of the enemy, and opened a rapid fire of shrapnel on the high ground which commanded the line of retreat, killing such of the tribesmen as were there, and absolutely forbidding the hill to their companions.
In all rearguard actions among the mountains the employment of artillery is imperative70. Even two guns may materially assist the extrication71 of the infantry from the peaks and crags of the hillside, and prevent by timely shells the tribesmen from seizing each point as soon as it is evacuated72. But there is no reason why the artillery should be stinted73, and at least two batteries, if available, should accompany a brigade to the attack.
Signalling by heliograph was throughout the operations of the greatest value. I had always realised the advantages of a semi-permanent line of signal stations along the communications to the telegraph, but I had doubted the practicability of using such complicated arrangements in action. In this torrid country, where the sun is always shining, the heliograph is always useful. As soon as any hill was taken, communication was established with the brigadier, and no difficulty seemed to be met with, even while the attack was in progress, in sending messages quickly and clearly. In a country intersected by frequent ravines, over which a horse can move but slowly and painfully, it is the surest, the quickest, and indeed the only means of intercommunication. I am delighted to testify to these things, because I had formerly been a scoffer74.
I have touched on infantry and artillery, and, though a previous chapter has been almost wholly devoted to the cavalry75, I cannot resist the desire to get back to the horses and the lances again. The question of sword or lance as the cavalryman76's weapon has long been argued, and it may be of interest to consider what are the views of those whose experience is the most recent. Though I have had no opportunity of witnessing the use of the lance, I have heard the opinions of many officers both of the Guides and the 11th Bengal Lancers. All admit or assert that the lance is in this warfare the better weapon. It kills with more certainty and convenience, and there is less danger of the horseman being cut down. As to length, the general opinion seems to be in favour of a shorter spear. This, with a counter poise77 at the butt78, gives as good a reach and is much more useful for close quarters. Major Beatson, one of the most distinguished79 cavalry officers on the frontier, is a strong advocate of this. Either the pennon should be knotted, or a boss of some sort affixed80 about eighteen inches below the point. Unless this be done there is a danger of the lance penetrating81 too far, when it either gets broken or allows the enemy to wriggle82 up and strike the lancer. This last actually happened on several occasions.
Now, in considering the question to what extent a squadron should be armed with lances, the system adopted by the Guides may be of interest. In this warfare it is very often necessary for the cavalryman to dismount and use his carbine. The lance then gets in the way and has to be tied to the saddle. This takes time, and there is usually not much time to spare in cavalry skirmishing. The Guides compromise matters by giving one man in every four a lance. This man, when the others dismount, stays in the saddle and holds their horses. They also give the outer sections of each squadron lances, and these, too, remain mounted, as the drill-book enjoins83. But I become too technical.
I pass for a moment to combined tactics. In frontier warfare Providence84 is on the side of the good band-o-bust [arrangements]. There are no scenic85 effects or great opportunities, and the Brigadier who leaves the mountains with as good a reputation as he entered them has proved himself an able, sensible man. The general who avoids all "dash," who never starts in the morning looking for a fight and without any definite intention, who does not attempt heroic achievements, and who keeps his eye on his watch, will have few casualties and little glory. For the enemy do not become formidable until a mistake has been made. The public who do not believe in military operations without bloodshed may be unattentive. His subordinate officers may complain that they have had no fighting. But in the consciousness of duty skillfully performed and of human life preserved he will find a high reward.
A general review of the frontier war will, I think, show the great disadvantages to which regular troops are exposed in fighting an active enterprising enemy that can move faster and shoot better, who knows the country and who knows the ranges. The terrible losses inflicted86 on the tribesmen in the Swat Valley show how easily disciplined troops can brush away the bravest savages88 in the open. But on the hillside all is changed, and the observer will be struck by the weakness rather than the strength of modern weapons. Daring riflemen, individually superior to the soldiers, and able to support the greatest fatigues, can always inflict loss, although they cannot bar their path.
The military problem with which the Spaniards are confronted in Cuba is in many points similar to that presented in the Afghan valleys; a roadless, broken and undeveloped country; an absence of any strategic points; a well-armed enemy with great mobility89 and modern rifles, who adopts guerilla tactics. The results in either case are, that the troops can march anywhere, and do anything, except catch the enemy; and that all their movements must be attended with loss.
If the question of subduing90 the tribes be regarded from a purely military standpoint, if time were no object, and there was no danger of a lengthy91 operation being interrupted by a change of policy at home, it would appear that the efforts of commanders should be, to induce the tribesmen to assume the offensive. On this point I must limit my remarks to the flat-bottomed valleys of Swat and Bajaur. To coerce92 a tribe like the Mamunds, a mixed brigade might camp at the entrance to the valley, and as at Inayat Kila, entrench23 itself very strongly. The squadron of cavalry could patrol the valley daily in complete security, as the tribesmen would not dare to leave the hills. All sowing of crops and agricultural work would be stopped. The natives would retaliate93 by firing into the camp at night. This would cause loss; but if every one were to dig a good hole to sleep in, and if the officers were made to have dinner before sundown, and forbidden to walk about except on duty after dark, there is no reason why the loss should be severe. At length the tribesmen, infuriated by the occupation of their valley, and perhaps rendered desperate by the approach of famine and winter, would make a tremendous attempt to storm the camp. With a strong entrenchment, a wire trip to break a rush, and modern rifles, they would be driven off with great slaughter94, and once severely punished would probably beg for terms. If not, the process would be continued until they did so.
Such a military policy would cost about the same in money as the vigorous methods I have described, as though smaller numbers of troops might be employed, they would have to remain mobilised and in the field for a longer period. But the loss in personnel would be much less. As good an example of the success of this method as can be found, is provided by Sir Bindon Blood's tactics at Nawagai, when, being too weak to attack the enemy himself, he encouraged them to attack him, and then beat them off with great loss.
From the point which we have now reached, it is possible, and perhaps not undesirable95, to take a rapid yet sweeping96 glance of the larger military problems of the day. We have for some years adopted the "short service" system. It is a continental system. It has many disadvantages. Troops raised under it suffer from youth, want of training and lack of regimental associations. But on the Continent it has this one, paramount recommendation: it provides enormous numbers. The active army is merely a machine for manufacturing soldiers quickly, and passing them into the reserves, to be stored until they are wanted. European nations deal with soldiers only in masses. Great armies of men, not necessarily of a high standard of courage and training, but armed with deadly weapons, are directed against one another, under varying strategical conditions. Before they can rebound97, thousands are slaughtered98 and a great battle has been won or lost. The average courage of the two nations may perhaps have been decided99. The essence of the continental system is its gigantic scale.
We have adopted this system in all respects but one, and that the vital one. We have got the poor quality, without the great quantity. We have, by the short service system, increased our numbers a little, and decreased our standard a good deal. The reason that this system, which is so well adapted to continental requirements, confers no advantages upon us is obvious. Our army is recruited by a voluntary system. Short service and conscription are inseparable. For this reason, several stern soldiers advocate conscription. But many words will have to be spoken, many votes voted, and perhaps many blows struck before the British people would submit to such an abridgment100 of their liberties, or such a drag upon their commerce. It will be time to make such sacrifices when the English Channel runs dry.
Without conscription we cannot have great numbers. It should therefore be our endeavour to have those we possess of the best quality; and our situation and needs enforce this view. Our soldiers are not required to operate in great masses, but very often to fight hand to hand. Their campaigns are not fought in temperate101 climates and civilised countries. They are sent beyond the seas to Africa or the Indian frontier, and there, under a hot sun and in a pestilential land, they are engaged in individual combat with athletic102 savages. They are not old enough for the work.
Young as they are, their superior weapons and the prestige of the dominant103 race enable them to maintain their superiority over the native troops. But in the present war several incidents have occurred, unimportant, insignificant104, it is true, but which, in the interests of Imperial expediency105, are better forgotten. The native regiments are ten years older than the British regiments. Many of their men have seen service and have been under fire. Some of them have several medals. All, of course, are habituated to the natural conditions. It is evident how many advantages they enjoy. It is also apparent how very serious the consequences would be if they imagined they possessed106 any superiority. That such an assumption should even be possible is a menace to our very existence in India. Intrinsic merit is the only title of a dominant race to its possessions. If we fail in this it is not because our spirit is old and grown weak, but because our soldiers are young, and not yet grown strong.
Boys of twenty-one and twenty-two are expected to compete on equal terms with Sikhs and Gurkhas of thirty, fully11 developed and in the prime of life. It is an unfair test. That they should have held their own is a splendid tribute to the vigour107 of our race. The experiment is dangerous, and it is also expensive. We continue to make it because the idea is still cherished that British armies will one day again play a part in continental war. When the people of the United Kingdom are foolish enough to allow their little army to be ground to fragments between continental myriads108, they will deserve all the misfortunes that will inevitably109 come upon them.
I am aware that these arguments are neither original nor new. I have merely arranged them. I am also aware that there are able, brilliant men who have spent their lives in the service of the State, who do not take the views I have quoted. The question has been regarded from an Indian point of view. There is probably no colonel in India, who commands a British regiment, who would not like to see his men five years older. It may be that the Indian opinion on the subject is based only on partial information, and warped110 by local circumstances. Still I have thought it right to submit it to the consideration of the public, at a time when the army has been filling such a prominent position, not only in the Jubilee111 procession and the frontier war, but also in the estimates presented to the House of Commons.
Passing from the concrete to the abstract, it may not be unfitting that these pages, which have recorded so many valiant112 deeds, should contain some brief inquiry113 into the nature of those motives114 which induce men to expose themselves to great hazards, and to remain in situations of danger. The circumstances of war contain every element that can shake the nerves. The whizzing of the projectiles115; the shouts and yells of a numerous and savage87 enemy; the piteous aspect of the wounded, covered with blood and sometimes crying out in pain; the spurts116 of dust which on all sides show where Fate is stepping—these are the sights and sounds which assail117 soldiers, whose development and education enable them to fully appreciate their significance. And yet the courage of the soldier is the commonest of virtues119. Thousands of men, drawn at random120 from the population, are found to control the instinct of self-preservation. Nor is this courage peculiar121 to any particular nation. Courage is not only common, but cosmopolitan122. But such are the apparent contradictions of life, that this virtue118, which so many seem to possess, all hold the highest. There is probably no man, however miserable123, who would not writhe124 at being exposed a coward. Why should the common be precious? What is the explanation?
It appears to be this. The courage of the soldier is not really contempt for physical evils and indifference125 to danger. It is a more or less successful attempt to simulate these habits of mind. Most men aspire126 to be good actors in the play. There are a few who are so perfect that they do not seem to be actors at all. This is the ideal after which the rest are striving. It is one very rarely attained127.
Three principal influences combine to assist men in their attempts: preparation, vanity and sentiment. The first includes all the force of discipline and training. The soldier has for years contemplated128 the possibility of being under fire. He has wondered vaguely129 what kind of an experience it would be. He has seen many who have gone through it and returned safely. His curiosity is excited. Presently comes the occasion. By road and railway he approaches daily nearer to the scene. His mind becomes familiar with the prospect130. His comrades are in the same situation. Habit, behind which force of circumstances is concealed131, makes him conform. At length the hour arrives. He observes the darting132 puffs of smoke in the distance. He listens to the sounds that are in the air. Perhaps he hears something strike with a thud and sees a soldier near him collapse133 like a shot pheasant. He realises that it may be his turn next. Fear grips him by the throat.
Then vanity, the vice19 which promotes so many virtues, asserts itself. He looks at his comrades and they at him. So far he has shown no sign of weakness. He thinks, they are thinking him brave. The dearly longed-for reputation glitters before his eyes. He executes the orders he receives.
But something else is needed to made a hero. Some other influence must help him through the harder trials and more severe ordeals134 which may befall him. It is sentiment which makes the difference in the end. Those who doubt should stroll to the camp fire one night and listen to the soldiers' songs. Every one clings to something that he thinks is high and noble, or that raises him above the rest of the world in the hour of need. Perhaps he remembers that he is sprung from an ancient stock, and of a race that has always known how to die; or more probably it is something smaller and more intimate; the regiment, whatever it is called—"The Gordons," "The Buffs," "The Queen's,"—and so nursing the name—only the unofficial name of an infantry battalion after all—he accomplishes great things and maintains the honour and the Empire of the British people.
It may be worth while, in the matter of names, to observe the advantages to a regiment of a monosyllabic appellation135. Every one will remember Lieut.-Colonel Mathias' speech to the Gordons. Imagine for a moment that speech addressed to some regiment saddled with a fantastic title on the territorial136 system, as, for instance, Mr. Kipling's famous regiment, "The Princess Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen-Anspach's Merthyr Tydvilshire Own Royal Loyal Light Infantry." With the old numbers all started on equal terms.
This has been perhaps a cold-blooded chapter. We have considered men as targets; tribesmen, fighting for their homes and hills, have been regarded only as the objective of an attack; killed and wounded human beings, merely as the waste of war. We have even attempted to analyse the high and noble virtue of courage, in the hopes of learning how it may be manufactured.
The philosopher may observe with pity, and the philanthropist deplore137 with pain, that the attention of so many minds should be directed to the scientific destruction of the human species; but practical people in a business-like age will remember that they live in a world of men—not angels—and regulate their conduct accordingly.
点击收听单词发音
1 trenches | |
深沟,地沟( trench的名词复数 ); 战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 cannon | |
n.大炮,火炮;飞机上的机关炮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 amazement | |
n.惊奇,惊讶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 convoy | |
vt.护送,护卫,护航;n.护送;护送队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 battalion | |
n.营;部队;大队(的人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 infantry | |
n.[总称]步兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 thither | |
adv.向那里;adj.在那边的,对岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 ponderous | |
adj.沉重的,笨重的,(文章)冗长的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 depots | |
仓库( depot的名词复数 ); 火车站; 车库; 军需库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 stationary | |
adj.固定的,静止不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 paramount | |
a.最重要的,最高权力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 mule | |
n.骡子,杂种,执拗的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 hardy | |
adj.勇敢的,果断的,吃苦的;耐寒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 mules | |
骡( mule的名词复数 ); 拖鞋; 顽固的人; 越境运毒者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 varied | |
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 entrenchment | |
n.壕沟,防御设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 entrench | |
v.使根深蒂固;n.壕沟;防御设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 artillery | |
n.(军)火炮,大炮;炮兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 prone | |
adj.(to)易于…的,很可能…的;俯卧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 swarm | |
n.(昆虫)等一大群;vi.成群飞舞;蜂拥而入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 dart | |
v.猛冲,投掷;n.飞镖,猛冲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 retirement | |
n.退休,退职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 retirements | |
退休( retirement的名词复数 ); 退职; 退役; 退休的实例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 disastrous | |
adj.灾难性的,造成灾害的;极坏的,很糟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 knoll | |
n.小山,小丘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 parley | |
n.谈判 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 strenuous | |
adj.奋发的,使劲的;紧张的;热烈的,狂热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 regiment | |
n.团,多数,管理;v.组织,编成团,统制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 vile | |
adj.卑鄙的,可耻的,邪恶的;坏透的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 horrid | |
adj.可怕的;令人惊恐的;恐怖的;极讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 inflict | |
vt.(on)把…强加给,使遭受,使承担 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 watchful | |
adj.注意的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 encumbered | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,拖累( encumber的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 instructors | |
指导者,教师( instructor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 trajectory | |
n.弹道,轨道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 necessitate | |
v.使成为必要,需要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 amputation | |
n.截肢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 violation | |
n.违反(行为),违背(行为),侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 ammunition | |
n.军火,弹药 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 numbing | |
adj.使麻木的,使失去感觉的v.使麻木,使麻痹( numb的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 dressing | |
n.(食物)调料;包扎伤口的用品,敷料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 conspicuous | |
adj.明眼的,惹人注目的;炫耀的,摆阔气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 regiments | |
(军队的)团( regiment的名词复数 ); 大量的人或物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 fatigues | |
n.疲劳( fatigue的名词复数 );杂役;厌倦;(士兵穿的)工作服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 laden | |
adj.装满了的;充满了的;负了重担的;苦恼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 pouches | |
n.(放在衣袋里或连在腰带上的)小袋( pouch的名词复数 );(袋鼠等的)育儿袋;邮袋;(某些动物贮存食物的)颊袋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 nutritious | |
adj.有营养的,营养价值高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 puny | |
adj.微不足道的,弱小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 dodging | |
n.避开,闪过,音调改变v.闪躲( dodge的现在分词 );回避 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 puffs | |
n.吸( puff的名词复数 );(烟斗或香烟的)一吸;一缕(烟、蒸汽等);(呼吸或风的)呼v.使喷出( puff的第三人称单数 );喷着汽(或烟)移动;吹嘘;吹捧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 knolls | |
n.小圆丘,小土墩( knoll的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 imperative | |
n.命令,需要;规则;祈使语气;adj.强制的;紧急的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 extrication | |
n.解脱;救出,解脱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 evacuated | |
撤退者的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 stinted | |
v.限制,节省(stint的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 scoffer | |
嘲笑者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 cavalry | |
n.骑兵;轻装甲部队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 cavalryman | |
骑兵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 poise | |
vt./vi. 平衡,保持平衡;n.泰然自若,自信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 butt | |
n.笑柄;烟蒂;枪托;臀部;v.用头撞或顶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 affixed | |
adj.[医]附着的,附着的v.附加( affix的过去式和过去分词 );粘贴;加以;盖(印章) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 penetrating | |
adj.(声音)响亮的,尖锐的adj.(气味)刺激的adj.(思想)敏锐的,有洞察力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 wriggle | |
v./n.蠕动,扭动;蜿蜒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 enjoins | |
v.命令( enjoin的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 scenic | |
adj.自然景色的,景色优美的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 savage | |
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 savages | |
未开化的人,野蛮人( savage的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 mobility | |
n.可动性,变动性,情感不定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 subduing | |
征服( subdue的现在分词 ); 克制; 制服; 色变暗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 lengthy | |
adj.漫长的,冗长的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 coerce | |
v.强迫,压制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 retaliate | |
v.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 slaughter | |
n.屠杀,屠宰;vt.屠杀,宰杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 undesirable | |
adj.不受欢迎的,不良的,不合意的,讨厌的;n.不受欢迎的人,不良分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 sweeping | |
adj.范围广大的,一扫无遗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 rebound | |
v.弹回;n.弹回,跳回 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 slaughtered | |
v.屠杀,杀戮,屠宰( slaughter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 abridgment | |
n.删节,节本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 temperate | |
adj.温和的,温带的,自我克制的,不过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 athletic | |
adj.擅长运动的,强健的;活跃的,体格健壮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 dominant | |
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 insignificant | |
adj.无关紧要的,可忽略的,无意义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 expediency | |
n.适宜;方便;合算;利己 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 myriads | |
n.无数,极大数量( myriad的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 warped | |
adj.反常的;乖戾的;(变)弯曲的;变形的v.弄弯,变歪( warp的过去式和过去分词 );使(行为等)不合情理,使乖戾, | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 jubilee | |
n.周年纪念;欢乐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 valiant | |
adj.勇敢的,英勇的;n.勇士,勇敢的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 projectiles | |
n.抛射体( projectile的名词复数 );(炮弹、子弹等)射弹,(火箭等)自动推进的武器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 spurts | |
短暂而突然的活动或努力( spurt的名词复数 ); 突然奋起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 assail | |
v.猛烈攻击,抨击,痛斥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 random | |
adj.随机的;任意的;n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 cosmopolitan | |
adj.世界性的,全世界的,四海为家的,全球的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 miserable | |
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 writhe | |
vt.挣扎,痛苦地扭曲;vi.扭曲,翻腾,受苦;n.翻腾,苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 aspire | |
vi.(to,after)渴望,追求,有志于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 attained | |
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 contemplated | |
adj. 预期的 动词contemplate的过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 vaguely | |
adv.含糊地,暖昧地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 concealed | |
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 darting | |
v.投掷,投射( dart的现在分词 );向前冲,飞奔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 ordeals | |
n.严峻的考验,苦难的经历( ordeal的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 appellation | |
n.名称,称呼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 territorial | |
adj.领土的,领地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 deplore | |
vt.哀叹,对...深感遗憾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |