The Dawn of Modern Science.—The Reformation of Medicine.—Paracelsus—The Sceptics.—The Protestantism of Science.—Influenza2.—Legal Recognition of Medicine in England.—The Barber-Surgeons.—The Sweating Sickness.—Origin of the Royal College of Physicians of London.—“Merry Andrew.”—Origin of St. Bartholomew’s Hospital.—Caius.—Low State of Midwifery.—The Great Continental3 Anatomists.—Vesalius.—Servetus.—Paré.—Influence of the Reformation.—The Rosicrucians.—Touching4 for the Evil.—Vivisection of Human Beings.—Origin of Legal Medicine.
The discovery of America in 1492 fitly typifies the still grander mental world about to disclose its wonders to the newly liberated6 minds of scientific investigators7. The revolt against authority in religion was paralleled by a scientific Protestantism; the mind of man, long held in bondage8 to absurd and groundless fancies, struggled to set itself free, to investigate, to test and explore on its account, instead of accepting for granted doctrines10 elaborated in the philosopher’s brains.
The revolt of medicine against the authority of Galen may be compared to the revolt against Aristotle in philosophy. The authority of the Arabian schools was overthrown12, the principles of Hippocrates were in the ascendant. The era of the Renaissance13 was not more an era of Protestantism than an age of Scepticism. Faith had become credulity, and credulity had sunk into imbecility. The power of the printing press, the spread of humanism, the beginning of scientific inquiry14, the discovery of the splendid treasure of classic literature, long buried beneath the dust of dark and barbarous ages, the widening of the mental horizon as the world doubled itself before the prows15 of the discoverers’ vessels—all these factors brought about the new birth of Science. It was the golden age of the medical sciences. Anatomy17 and surgery awoke, from their long slumber18, and Europe entered upon a period of scientific investigation19 such as the world had never known before. Medicine formed an alliance with what are called its accessory sciences; chemistry liberated from slavery to the alchemist, botany set free from the delusions20 of the doctrine9 of “signatures,” pharmacy21 elevated into a branch of medical science from the kitchen and the346 confectioner’s store-room, lent their aid, in conjunction with the hydraulics and pneumatics of the natural philosopher, to advance it. All these things meant revolt against the old order, Protestantism against the outworn creeds22 of Greek and Arabian dogmatists. They meant more than this. Ere the ground could be cleared for the new palace of physical science which the glorious sixteenth century was to rear, scepticism must lend its withering23 and desolating24 aid; foul25 undergrowths must be destroyed; evil germs, bred of the stagnant26 marshes27 of the dark ages, must perish under the wholesome28, if ruthless, disinfectants of reason and unbelief. There was a stern need of this. The demon29 theory of disease had lasted from primeval ages up to this dawn of the sixteenth century. From glacial times, through savage30 ages and religions, and often in beautifully poetic32 faiths, the disease-demon held its own. Even in the hallowed and renovating33 pages of the gospels the disease-demon stalks unchallenged save by the thaumaturgist. Now he is to be banished34 from the mind of civilized35 man for ever; and to reach this goal atheism36 was needed. The sixteenth century, so far as medicine and physical science are concerned, opens with the Cabalist Theosophists, Trithemius, Cornelius Agrippa, Cardan, and their followers37. Giordano Bruno, the aggressive atheist38 and martyr39 of science, Montaigne, the philosophic40 sceptic, Charron, the opponent of all religion, and Rabelais, the witty41 scoffer42 at the gross corruptions43 of orthodoxy, helped to clear the ground for the work of the scientists. Meanwhile Paracelsus, from his chair at Basel University, having made an auto-da-fe of ancient and dogmatic medicine, lays the foundation-stone of the medicine of the modern era.
An army of savants begins to work for science as well as literature. Linacre has introduced Italian Humanism to the doctors of England; Caius busies himself with the Greek and Latin texts of the great writers on medicine; Gesner, the German Pliny, and Aldrovandi promote the study of natural history. Everywhere men are busy with the beginnings of electricity, chemistry, mineralogy, botany, and the other sciences which are to be the handmaidens of medicine. One clear voice is heard from Basel. It is that of Paracelsus, exhuming44 physical science: “You Italy, you Dalmatia, you Sarmatia, Athens, Greece, Arabia, and Israel, follow me. Come out of the night of the mind!”
The teacher of Paracelsus, who exercised the greatest influence upon his mental development, was the celebrated45 Trithemius, the abbot of the Spanheim Benedictines (about 1500), who was so famous a student of chemistry and the occult philosophy that scholars and mighty46 nobles went on pilgrimages and princes sent ambassadors, to his monastery47 to347 gather some fragments of his vast learning. Amongst many works, he published several on magical subjects, and was the first who told the wondrous48 story of Dr. Faustus, in whose magical doings he was a devout49 believer.829 His famous library consisted of the rare possession of two thousand volumes. Cornelius Agrippa was his pupil, and in a letter which he sent to his old master, with the manuscript of his Occult Philosophy, we find a passage which throws a light on the studies of the worthy50 abbot: “We conferred much about chemical matters, magic, cabalism, and other things which at the present time lie hidden as secret sciences and arts.”830
Theophrastus Bombastus Paracelsus of Hohenheim (1493-1541), “The Reformer of Medicine,” “Luther Alter,” effected a revolution in medicine, and is one of the most remarkable51 characters, not only in the history of the medical profession, but in that of civilization. There was so much in this great man’s conduct to admire, and so much of which to disapprove52, that it is not surprising that he has been either wholly praised or entirely53 condemned54, and by very few considered dispassionately. Perhaps Mr. Browning, in his noble poem Paracelsus, has given the world the truest conception of a man who did for his profession and for humanity the enormous service of liberating55 medicine from a slavish adhesion to authority, though it must be admitted that he was guilty of extravagances and excesses we may find it difficult to excuse, even though for the most part they were faults common to his country and his age. Paracelsus was born ten years later than Luther, at Einsiedeln, near Zurich. He studied under the abbot Trithemius of Spanheim, who was a great adept56 in magic, alchemy, and astrology. Under this teacher he acquired a taste for occult studies, and formed a determination to use them for the welfare of mankind. Trithemius was a theosophist. As was the custom of the times, Paracelsus became an itinerant57 student after his course at the University of Basel. He studied chemistry in the laboratory of the Fuggers at Schwatz, in the Tyrol.
Attached to the armies, he travelled widely as a military surgeon in the Netherlands, the Romagna, Naples, Venice, Denmark. He worked in the mines, that he might acquire a knowledge of metals, working as a common labourer for his bread. In Bohemian fashion he wandered over the world, visiting Spain, Portugal, Egypt, Tartary, and the East. He picked up his scientific knowledge by any means rather than from books. He said,348 “Reading never made a doctor, but practice is what forms a physician. For all reading is a footstool to practice, and a mere58 feather broom. He who meditates59 discovers something.” And so he held converse60 with the common folk, and talked and drank with boors61, shepherds, Jews, gypsies, and tramps, gaining odd scraps62 of knowledge wherever he could. He had no books. His only volume was Nature, whom he interrogated63 at first-hand. He would rather learn medicine and surgery from an old country nurse than from an university lecturer. If there was one thing which he detested64 more than another, it was the principle of authority. He bent65 his head to no man.
In the year 1525 Paracelsus went to Basel, where he was fortunate in curing Froben, the great printer, by his laudanum, when he had the gout. Froben was the friend of Erasmus, who was associated with ?colampadius, and soon after, upon the recommendation of ?colampadius, he was appointed by the city magnates a professor of physics, medicine, and surgery, with a considerable salary; at the same time they made him city physician, to the duties of which office he requested might be added inspector66 of drug shops. This examination made the druggists his bitterest enemies, as he detected their fraudulent practices; they combined to set the other doctors of the city against him, and as these were exceedingly jealous of his skill and success, poor Paracelsus found himself in a hornet’s nest. We find him a professor at Basel University in 1526. He has become famous as a physician, the medicines which he has discovered he has successfully used in his practice; he was now in the eyes of his patients at least,
“The wondrous Paracelsus, life’s dispenser,
He began his lectures at Basel by lighting68 some sulphur in a chafing69 dish, and burning the books of his great predecessors70 in the medical art, Avicenna, Galen, and others, saying: “Sic vos ardebitis in gehenna.” He boasted that he had read no books for ten years, though he protested that his shoe-buckles were more learned than the authors whose works he had burned.
It must have been a wonderful spectacle when this new teacher took his place before his pupils. The benches occupied hitherto by a dozen or two of students were crowded with an eager audience anxious for the new learning. Literature had been exhumed71 many years before, and now it was the turn of Science! Leaving the morbid72 seclusion73 of the cloisters74, men had given up dreaming for inquiry, and baseless visions for the acquisition of facts. This was the childhood of our science, and its days were bright with the poetry of youth. It is a sight to arouse349 our enthusiasm to see in the early dawn of our modern science this man standing75 up alone to pit himself against the whole scientific authority of his day. He rises from the crucibles76 and fires where his predecessors had been vainly seeking for gold and silver, ever and again pretending to have found them, and always going empty-handed to a deluded77 world. Henceforth, he says, his alchemy shall serve a nobler purpose than gold seeking; it shall aid in the healing of disease. He casts aside the sacred books of medicine which have been handed down the ages by his predecessors; destroying them, he declares, with an earnestness which is less tinged79 by arrogance80 than by conviction, that these men had been blind guides, that he alone has the clue of the maze81, and he forsakes82 all to follow Truth, though she lead him to death. In his generous impulse to serve mankind he has spoken harshly of his opponents. They would not have helped him, any way. He was above them; they could not understand him, so they hated him, and he scorned them. As too often happens to such heroes, he forgot the love of his neighbour in his love for mankind.
Paracelsus found his pupils holding fast by the teachings of the school of Salerno, and there seems no ground for supposing that the healing art had made the slightest progress in Europe from the foundation of that school in 1150, except perhaps in pharmacy. On the day that Paracelsus stood up before his audience at Basel University, he cried, “Away with ?tius, Oribasius, Galen, Rhasis, Serapion, Avicenna, Averroes, and the other blocks!” He had diplomas sent him from Germany, France, and Italy, and a letter from Erasmus.
In 1528 we find him at Colmar, in Alsatia. He has been driven by priests and doctors from Basel.
He had been called to the bedside of some rich cleric who was ill. He cured him, but so speedily that his fee was refused. Though not at all a mercenary man (for he always gave the poor his services gratuitously), he sued the priest; but the judge refused to interfere85, and Paracelsus used strong language to him, and had to fly to escape punishment. We must not be too hard upon the canon. Disease was treated with profound respect in those days, and great patients liked to be cured with deliberation and some ceremonial.
The closing scenes of the life of Paracelsus were passed in a cell in the hospital of Salzburg, in the year 1541, when he died at the age of forty-eight, a martyr of science. Recent investigations86 in contemporary records have proved that he had been attacked by the servants of certain physicians who were his jealous enemies, and that in consequence of a fall he sustained a fracture of the skull87, which proved fatal in a few days.
350
Within a period of time covering fifteen years he had written some 106 treatises89 on medicine, alchemy, natural history and philosophy, magic, and other subjects. He despised University learning. “The book of Nature,” he declared, “was that which the physician should read, and to do so he must walk over its leaves.” His library consisted of a Bible, St. Jerome on the Gospels, a volume on medicine, and seven manuscripts. His epitaph tells but a part of his honours. “Here lies Philippus Paracelsus, the famous doctor of medicine, who, by his wonderful art, cured bad wounds, lepra, gout, dropsy, and other incurable90 diseases, and to his own honour divided his possessions among the poor.”
This but feebly expresses what medicine owes to him. He discovered the metal zinc91, and hydrogen gas. In place of the elaborate concoctions92 and filthy94 messes which were given as medicines in his time, he taught doctors to give tinctures and quintessences of drugs. He invented laudanum, and anticipated our discovery of transfusion95 of blood. He opposed the barbarous method of reducing dislocations and dealing96 with fractures, introduced the use of mercury in the treatment of syphilis, and came very near to the discoveries which go under the name of Darwinism. He taught that chemistry was to be employed, not in making gold, but for the preparation of medicines; and he introduced into practice mineral remedies, including mineral baths, iron, sulphur, antimony, arsenic97, gold, tin, lead, etc. Amongst the vegetable remedies employed by him was arnica.
Paracelsus used chemical principles, says Sprengel, for the explanation of particular diseases. “Most or all diseases, according to him, arise from the effervescence of salts, from the combustion98 of sulphur, or from the coagulation99 of mercury.”831
His ?tiology attributed diseases to five causes:—1. The Ens astrale (a certain power of the stars); this means no more than foul air. 2. The Ens veneni (power of poison), arising from errors of assimilation and digestion100. 3. The Ens naturale (power of nature or of the body); diatheses. 4. Ens spirituale (power of the spirit); the disorders101 which arise from perverted103 ideas. 5. Ens Dei (power of God); the injuries or causes of disease predetermined by God.832
When Paracelsus came upon the scene of medical history, alchemy had just begun to lose its credit. The true students of science had discovered its deceptions104 and had abandoned it to the quacks105. It has often happened, and happens still, that certain pretended sciences, when cast aside as worthless, are taken from their hiding-places and made to351 do duty in another and perhaps nobler form. Paracelsus set himself the task of rehabilitating106 alchemy. The deeper thinkers, the more ardent107 truth-seekers in religion and science, imbued108 with philosophy and penetrated109 by the scholasticism of the age, were quite ready for a new reign110 of theosophical medicine to take the place of the Arabian polypharmacy.
George Agricola (1494-1555) was a physician who practised in Bohemia, and was the first to raise mineralogy to the dignity of a science. He did so much for it, in fact, that no great advance was made in it from the point at which he left it, till the eighteenth century.
Conrad Gesner (1516-1565), surnamed the German Pliny, was a famous naturalist111 of vast erudition, and imbued with an enthusiastic love of science. In 1541 he was professor of physics and natural history at Zurich. He wrote several books on ancient medicine and botany. To prepare himself to write his History of Animals, he read 250 authors, travelled nearly all over Europe, and gathered information from every source, even from hunters and shepherds. His medical works show that he was far above the absurd fancies and prejudices of his time.
Andreas C?salpinus (1519-1603), the first systematical botanist113, and the founder114 of the work which Linn?us developed, studied, if he did not also teach, anatomy and medicine at Pisa. He had a clear idea of the circulation of the blood, at least through the lungs, and he was the first to use the term “circulation.” Claims have been made on his behalf as the discoverer of the circulation; but they cannot be substantiated115, as he did not know of the direct flow of the blood from the arteries116 to the veins117.
Cardan (1501-1576), a physician and astrologer, was also a half-crazy magician. He was a skilful118 physician, and visited King Edward VI. to calculate his nativity, and Cardinal119 Beaton to cure him in his sickness.
Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was an Italian philosopher of the Renaissance, who, from a determination to study the universe for himself, threw off the restraints of the Christian120 religion and revolted against the authority of Aristotle and tradition. His most popular and characteristic work is the Spaccio. He was not an atheist, as has been asserted, but a pantheist. He considered the soul of man as a thinking monad, and as immortal121. He was burnt at the stake for his opinions, which, it must be admitted, were in some respects detrimental122 to morality as well as to faith.
Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592), the sceptical founder of a new philosophy, and one of the most delightful123 of essayists, anticipated the352 scientific spirit by his minute and critical observation upon the curious facts connected with human nature.
Euricus Cordus (1486-1535), who studied medicine at Erfurt, is famous for the following admirable epigram:—
“Three faces wears the doctor: when first sought,
But, when that cure complete, he seeks his fee,
The Devil looks then less terrible than he.”
His son, Valerius Cordus (1515-1544), was the discoverer of sulphuric ether.
Antonio Benivieni (c. 1500), a physician of Florence, was the morning star of a new era for surgery, when he insisted that the compilations126 of the ancients and Arabians ought to be given up for the observation of nature.833 Thus, before the time of Ambroise Paré (1509-1590), the way for the reception of the true modern surgery was prepared in Italy by the efforts of those who strove to induce educated and talented men to devote their attention to this branch of the healing art.
Influenza.
A violent and extensive catarrhal fever prevailed in France and Europe generally in 1510. Hecker considers there is evidence that it had its origin in the remotest parts of the East.834 His description of this influenza is as follows:353 “The catarrhal symptoms, which, on the appearance of disorders of this kind, usually form their commencement, seem to have been quite thrown into the background by those of violent rheumatism127 and inflammation. The patient was first seized with giddiness and severe headache; then came on a shooting pain through the shoulders and extending to the thighs128. The loins, too, were affected129 with intolerably painful dartings, during which an inflammatory fever set in with delirium130 and violent excitement. In some the parotid glands131 became inflamed132, and even the digestive organs participated in the deep-rooted malady133; for those affected had, together with constant oppression at the stomach, a great loathing134 for all animal food, and a dislike even of wine. Among the poor as well as the rich many died, and some quite suddenly, of this strange disease, in the treatment of which the physicians shortened life not a little by their purgative135 treatment and phlebotomy, seeking an excuse for their ignorance in the influence of the constellations136, and alleging137 that astral diseases were beyond the reach of human art.”
Legal Recognition of Medical Practitioners138.
The first Act of Parliament dealing with the medical profession in England was passed in the year 1511, and is entitled “An Act for the Appointing of Physicians and Surgeons,” the preamble139 of which runs as follows:—
“Forasmuch as the science and cunning of Physick and Surgery (to the perfect knowledge of which be requisite140 both great learning and ripe experience) is daily within this realm exercised by a great multitude of ignorant persons, of whom the greater part have no manner of insight in the same, nor in any other kind of learning; some also can read no letters on the book, so far forth78 that common artificers, as smiths, weavers141, and women, boldly and accustomably take upon them great cures, and things of great difficulty, in the which they partly use sorcery and witchcraft142, partly apply such medicines unto the disease as be very noxious143, and nothing meet therefore, to the high displeasure of God, great infamy144 to the faculty, and the grievous hurt, damage, and destruction of many of the king’s liege people; most especially of them that cannot discern the uncunning from the cunning. Be it therefore (to the surety and comfort of all manner of people) by the authority of this present Parliament enacted146:—That no person within the city of London, nor within seven miles of the same, take upon him to exercise and occupy as a Physician or Surgeon except he be first examined, approved, and admitted by the Bishop147 of London, or by the Dean of St. Paul’s, for the time being, calling to him or them four Doctors of Physic, and for Surgeons, other expert persons in that faculty; and for the first examination such as they shall think convenient, and afterwards alway four of them that have been so approved.835 ...
“That no person out of the said city and precinct of seven miles of the same, except he have been (as is aforesaid) approved in the same, take upon him to exercise and occupy as a Physician or Surgeon, in any diocese within this realm; but if he be first examined and approved by the Bishop of the same diocese, or, he being out of the diocese, by his vicar-general; either of them calling to them such expert persons in the said faculties148, as their discretion149 shall think convenient....”836
354
The Barber-Surgeons.
The occupation of shaving and trimming beards was anciently considered a profession, and was united to that of surgery. In the reign of Louis XIV. of France the hairdressers were formally separated from the Barber-Surgeons, who were incorporated as a distinct medical body.
A London Company of Barbers was formed in 1308, and the first year of the reign of Edward IV. (1462) the barbers were incorporated by a charter which was confirmed by many succeeding monarchs150. In 1540 the Company of Barbers, and those who practised purely151 as Surgeons, were united as “the commonalty of Barbers and Surgeons of London.” It was enacted (32 Hen. VIII.) that “No person using any shaving or barbery in London shall occupy any surgery, letting of blood, or other matter, except only drawing of teeth.” The Surgeons’ corporation in London two years later petitioned Parliament to be exempted152 from bearing arms and serving on juries, so that they might be free to attend to their practice.837 Their petition was granted, and all medical men are in the enjoyment153 of these privileges at the present time.
An Act of Parliament was passed in 1540 allowing the United Companies of Barbers and Surgeons to have yearly four bodies of criminals for purposes of dissection154. This is supposed to have been the first legislative155 enactment156 passed in any country for promoting the study of anatomy.838
Surgery in England in the reign of Henry VIII. was in a deplorable condition. Thomas Gale11 thus describes the surgeons of the time:—
“I remember when I was in the wars at Montreuil, in the time of that most famous prince, Henry VIII., there was a great rabblement there that took upon them to be surgeons. Some were sow-gelders, and some horse-gelders, with tinkers and cobblers. This noble sect5 did such great cures that they got themselves a perpetual name; for like as Thessalus’ sect were called Thessalonians, so was this noble rabblement, for their notorious cures, called dog-leeches; for in two dressings157 they did commonly make their cures whole and sound for ever, so that they felt neither heat nor cold, nor no manner of pain after. But when the Duke of Norfolk, who was then general, understood how the people did die, and that of small wounds, he sent for me and certain other surgeons, commanding us to make search how these men came to their death, whether it were by the grievousness of their355 wounds or by the lack of knowledge of the surgeons; and we, according to our commandment, made search through all the camp, and found many of the same good fellows which took upon them the names of surgeons; not only the names but the wages also. We asking of them whether they were surgeons or no, they said they were; we demanded with whom they were brought up, and they, with shameless faces, would answer, either with one cunning man, or another, which was dead. Then we demanded of them what chirurgery stuff they had to cure men withal; and they would show us a pot or a box which they had in a budget, wherein was such trumpery158 as they did use to grease horses’ heels withal, and laid upon scabbed horses’ backs, with verval and such like. And others that were cobblers and tinkers used shoemaker’s wax, with the rust159 of old pans, and made therewith ‘a noble salve,’ as they did term it. But in the end this worthy rabblement was committed to the Marshalsea, and threatened to be hanged for their worthy deeds, except they would declare the truth—what they were and of what occupations; and in the end they did confess, as I have declared to you before.”
Gale says in another place: “I have, myself, in the time of King Henry VIII., helped to furnish out of London, in one year, which served by sea and land, three score and twelve surgeons, which were good workmen, and well able to serve, and all Englishmen. At this present day there are not thirty-four of all the whole company of Englishmen, and yet the most part of them be in noblemen’s service, so that if we should have need, I do not know where to find twelve sufficient men. What do I say? sufficient men? Nay160; I would there were ten amongst all the company worthy to be called surgeons.”
In the year 1518 the Barbers and Surgeons were united in one company. The Barbers were restricted from performing any surgical161 operations, except drawing teeth, and the Surgeons, on their part, had to abandon shaving and trimming beards. Physicians were permitted to practise surgery.
In the year 1542 it became necessary to pass an Act to further regulate the practice of Surgery, the chief points of which are the following:356 “Whereas in the Parliament holden at Westminster, in the third year of the King’s Most Gracious Reign, amongst other things, for the avoiding of sorceries, witchcrafts, and other inconveniences, it was enacted, That no person within the City of London, nor within seven miles of the same, should take upon him to exercise and occupy as Physician and Surgeon, except he be first examined, admitted, and approved by the Bishop of London, etc.... Sithence the making of which said Act, the Company and Fellowship of Surgeons of London, minding onely their owne lucres, and nothing the profit or ease of the diseased or patient, have sued, troubled, and vexed162 divers163 honest persons, as well men as women, whom God hath endueed with the knowledge of the nature, kind and operation of certain herbs, roots and waters, and the using and ministering of them, to such as have been pained with custumable diseases, as women’s breasts being sore, a pin and the web in the eye, uncomes of the hands, scaldings, burnings, sore mouths, the stone, stranguary, saucelin, and morphew, and such other like diseases.... And yet the said persons have not taken anything for their pains or cunning.... In consideration whereof, and for the ease, comfort, succour, help, relief, and health of the King’s poor subjects, inhabitants of this his realm, now pained or diseased, or that hereafter shall be pained or diseased, Be it ordained164, etc., that at all time from henceforth it shall be lawful165 to every person being the King’s subject, having knowledge and experience of the nature of herbs, roots and waters, etc., to use and minister according to their cunning, experience, and knowledge ... the aforesaid statute166 ... or any other Act notwithstanding.”
The Sweating Sickness.
In 1517 England was visited by a third attack of the Sweating Sickness. Public business was suspended, the King moved his court from place to place, and a panic seized the people. Erasmus, writing to Wolsey’s physician, says: “I am frequently astonished and grieved to think how it is that England has been now for so many years troubled by a continual pestilence167, especially by a deadly sweat, which appears in a great measure to be peculiar168 to your country. I have read how a city was once delivered from a plague by a change in the houses, made at the suggestion of a philosopher. I am inclined to think that this also must be the deliverance for England.” He proceeds to suggest that better ventilation is necessary for dwellings169; he remarks that the glass windows admit light, but not air; that such air as does enter comes in as draughts170, through holes and corners full of pestilential emanations. The floors laid with clay and covered with rushes, the bottom layer of which was unchanged sometimes for twenty years, harboured expectorations, vomitings, filth93, and all sorts of abominations.
He advises that the use of rushes should be given up, that the rooms should be so built as to be exposed to the light and fresh air on two or three sides, and that the windows be so constructed as to be easily opened or closed. He declares that at one time, if he ever entered a room which had not been occupied for some months, he was sure to357 take a fever. He suggests that the people should eat less, especially of salt meats, and that proper officers be appointed to keep the streets and suburbs in better order. Erasmus was thus our first sanitary171 reformer.
Aubrey gives839 a selection of the favourite prescriptions172 in use at this period against the Sweating Sickness:—
“Take endive, sowthistle, marygold, m’oney and nightshade, three handfuls of all, and seethe173 them in conduit water, from a quart to a pint174, then strain it into a fair vessel16, then delay it with a little sugar to put away the tartness175, and then drink it when the sweat taketh you, and keep you warm; and by the grace of God ye shall be whole.”
“Take half an handful of rew, called herbe grace, an handful marygold, half an handful featherfew, a handful sorrel, a handful burnet, and half a handful dragons, the top in summer, the root in winter; wash them in running water, and put them in an earthen pot with a pottle of running water, and let them seethe soberly to nigh the half be consumed, and then draw aback the pot to it be almost cold, and then strain it into a fair glass and keep it close, and use thereof morn and even, and when need is oftener; and if it be bitter, delay it with sugar candy; and if it be taken afore the pimples176 break forth, there is no doubt but with the grace of Jesu it shall amend177 any man, woman or child.”
“Another very true medicine.—For to say every day at seven parts of your body, seven paternosters, and seven Ave Marias, with one Credo at the last. Ye shal begyn at the ryght syde, under the ryght ere, saying the ‘paternoster qui es in c?lis, sanctificetur nomen tuum,’ with a cross made there with your thumb, and so say the paternoster full complete, and one Ave Maria, and then under the left ere, and then under the left armhole, and then under the left the [thigh?] hole, and then the last at the heart, with one paternoster, Ave Maria, with one Credo; and these thus said daily, with the grace of God is there no manner drede hym.”
The Royal College of Physicians of London Established.
The Royal College of Physicians of London was founded by Henry VIII. for the repression178 of irregular and unlearned medical practice. The Letters Patent constituting the College were dated 23rd September, 1518. The king was moved to this by the example of similar institutions in Italy and elsewhere, by the solicitations of Thomas Linacre, one of his own physicians, and by the advice and recommendation of Cardinal Wolsey. Six physicians are named in the358 Letters Patent as constituting the College, viz., John Chambre, Thomas Linacre, and Ferdinand de Victoria, the king’s physicians; and Nicholas Halsewell, John Francis, and Robert Yaxlery, physicians, “and all men of the same faculty, of and in London, and within seven miles thereof, are incorporated as one body and perpetual community or college.”840
Dr. Chambre was a priest before he became a physician. He was educated at Oxford179, studied at Padua, where he graduated in physic.
Dr. Thomas Linacre was a distinguished180 scholar and physician, who was born a.d. 1460. In 1484 he was elected a fellow of All Souls’, Oxford; the next year he went to Bologna, where he studied under Pulitian; he then went to Florence, where he became acquainted with Lorenzo the Great; from Florence, he went to Rome, and thence to Venice and Padua, which at that time was the most celebrated school of physic in the world, and took the degree of Doctor of Medicine with the highest applause. Linacre founded (1524) two Physic Lectures at Oxford and one at Cambridge, but “they were not performed till divers years after Linacre’s death, on account of the troubles concerning religion.”841
Dr. Andrew Borde, Carthusian monk181, physician, wit and buffoon182, lived in the reign of Henry VIII. He took his physician’s degree at Montpellier in 1532, and afterwards became one of the court physicians on his return to England. He was a learned, genial183, and sensible doctor, but possessed184 “a rambling185 head and an inconstant mind,” as Anthony à Wood says. He wrote voluminously. His chief works, the Breviary of Health, The Dietary of Health, and The Book of the Introduction to Knowledge, have been edited by Dr. F.?J. Furnivall, and published for the Early English Text Society in a volume which is one of the most entertaining works on medicine ever written. Borde earned his title of “Merry Andrew” (a name which has become a household word) from attending fairs and revels186, and conducting himself with the buffoonery which ill became so learned a man. Doubtless, however, it endeared him to his countrymen of the period. His medical works are full of prescriptions for various complaints, and many of them are exceedingly valuable and fully31 equal to the best treatment followed now.
Thomas Vicary was probably born between 1490 and 1500, was not a trained surgeon, but “a meane practiser” at Maidstone. In 1525 he was junior of the three Wardens187 of the Barbers’ or Barber-Surgeons’ Company in London. In 1528 he was Upper or First Warden188 of the359 Company, and one of the surgeons to Henry VIII., at £20 a year. In 1530 he was Master of the Barber-Surgeons’ Company, and at the head of his profession till his death in 1561 or 1562. As Dr. Furnivall says, he was “the Paget of his great Tudor time.” Soon after the dissolution of the monasteries189, Henry VIII., at the request of the City of London, handed over the monastic hospitals, Bartholomew’s and others, to the Corporation of London. He gave to Bartholomew’s a small endowment (nominally £333 odd) out of old houses which he charged with pensions to parsons. The city raised £1000 for repairs and reopened the hospital for one hundred patients, and on 29th September, 1548, appointed Chief-Surgeon Vicary as one of the six new governors of the hospital. The reorganization of the hospital was in a large measure due to this excellent man and intelligent surgeon. In 1548 he published the first English work on Anatomy, The Anatomie of the Body of Man, which was reprinted by the Surgeons of Bartholomew’s in 1577. This text-book held the field for 150 years.842
Those who are interested in the origin of our oldest and greatest hospital in London will find much valuable information in the Truly Christian Ordre of the Hospital of S. Bartholomewes, 1552, published as Appendix XVI. in Dr. Furnivall’s Vicary, p. 291.
Robert Copland in 1547 or 48 published his book called The Hy Way to the Spitt House. This is an important and interesting account of the scamps and rogues190 who resorted to St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, in the time of Henry VIII., after the Statute 22nd Hen. VIII. (1530-1), against vagabonds. At that time the hospital gave temporary lodging191 to almost all the needy192, as well as a permanent home to the deserving poor and sick; and sisters attended to them. Copland learns from the porter all about the ne’er-do-wells and the rascals193 who sought to impose on the charity.843
The old herbalists were often very patient and devoted194 investigators, who experimented upon themselves, and by these means accumulated a great number of facts of great use in the art of medicine. Conrad Gesner was one of these; he used to eat small portions of wild herbs, and test their effects on his own person, sitting down in the study with the plants around him.844
Sir William Butts195, M.D. (died 1545), was physician to Henry VIII., and was the friend of Wolsey, Cranmer, and Latimer. He was360 knighted by Henry, and is immortalised in Shakspeare’s play of Henry VIII.
George Owen, M.D. (died 1558), was physician to Henry VIII., Edward VI., and Queen Mary. It has been said that Edward VI. was brought into the world by Dr. Owen, who performed the C?sarian operation on his mother.
John Caius, M.D. (1510-1573), entered Gonville Hall, Cambridge, 1529. He at first studied divinity, but in 1539 went to Padua to study medicine under Montanus. Whilst at Padua, Caius lodged196 in the same house with the anatomist Vesalius, devoting no less attention to anatomy than his companion. He took the degree of doctor of medicine at Padua. He was public professor of Greek in that University; in 1543 he visited all the great libraries of Italy, collecting MSS., with the view of giving correct editions of the works of Galen and Celsus. In 1552 he was residing in London, and published an account of the Sweating Sickness which prevailed in 1551. He was physician to Edward VI., Mary, and Elizabeth. Dr. Caius enlarged and augmented197 the resources of the college at Cambridge, at which he had been educated; and he rendered eminent198 service to the College of Physicians by defending its rights against the illegal practices of the surgeons, who interfered199 with the proper functions of the physicians. His munificent200 foundation at Cambridge is a claim on the gratitude201 of the English nation, and ensures him a high place for ever in the annals of our universities. The visitor to Cambridge will not fail to remember that it was he who built the three singular gates at his college, inscribed202 to Humility203, to Virtue204 and Wisdom, and to Honour. But he has another lasting205 claim to respect on the grounds that he first introduced the study of practical anatomy into this country, and was the first publicly to teach it, which he did in the hall of the Barber-Surgeons, shortly after his return from Italy. Dr. Caius was a profound classical scholar, and left numerous works on the Greek and Latin medical authors. As a naturalist, linguist206, critic, and antiquary, he was no less distinguished than as a physician.
Edward Wotton, M.D. (died 1555), seems to have been the first English physician who applied207 himself specially145 to the study of natural history. He made himself famous by his work on this subject, entitled De Differentiis Animalium.
Dr. Geynes (died 1563) was cited before the College of Physicians for impugning208 the authority of Galen; he recanted and humbly209 acknowledged his heresy210, and was duly pardoned. The circumstance is a curious illustration of the sentiments of the times.845
361
Simon Ludford was originally a friar who became an apothecary211 in London, who was admitted by the University of Oxford to the baccalaureate in medicine, although totally ignorant and incompetent212. The College reproved the University, and he was compelled to undergo a course of study, when he was ultimately admitted doctor of medicine in Oxford, and Fellow of the College of Physicians in 1563.
William Gilbert, M.D. (born 1540), engaged in experiments relative to the magnet, achieving results which Galileo declared to be “great to a degree which might be envied,” and which induced Galileo to turn his mind to magnetism214.846
Thomas Penny, M.D. (practised in London, 1570-1). Gerard styles him “a second Dioscorides, for his singular knowledge of plants.” He was also one of the first Englishmen who studied insects.
Peter Turner, M.D. (died 1614), was physician to St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, and one of the greatest botanists215 of his age.
Thomas Muffet, M.D., the learned friend of distinguished physicians and naturalists216, was esteemed217 in his day the famous ornament218 of the body of physicians (died 1604).
Berenger of Capri (died 1527) flourished at Bologna (1518). He was a zealous220 anatomist, and declared that he had “dissected more than one hundred human bodies.” He was the first who recognised the larger proportional size of the male chest than the female, and the converse concerning the pelvis. He discovered the two arytenoid cartilages in the larynx, first accurately221 described the thymus, and gave a good description of the brain and the internal ear, in which he noticed the malleus and incus. He rectified222 some of the mistakes of Mondino, but was, like all other anatomists before Harvey, deeply perplexed223 about the heart and the circulation. He investigated the structure of the valves of the heart.
The art of midwifery, up to the middle of the sixteenth century, was in the lowest possible condition. In 1521, a doctor named Veites was condemned to the flames in Hamburg, for engaging in the business of midwifery. In the year 1500, the wife of one Jacob Nufer, of Thurgau, a Swiss sow-gelder, being in peril224 of her life in pregnancy225, though thirteen midwives and several surgeons had attempted to deliver her in the ordinary way, it occurred to her husband to ask permission of the authorities, and the help of God, to deliver her “as he would a sow.” He was completely successful, and thus performed the first C?sarian operation on the living patient, who lived to bear362 several other children in the natural way, and died at the age of seventy-seven. Another sow-gelder performed the operation of ovariotomy on his own daughter, in the sixteenth century.
Fran?ois Rousset (about 1581), physician to the Duke of Savoy, was the first to write upon the C?sarian operation. The improvement in printing and engraving226 caused the works of the Greek, Roman, and Arabian writers to be more widely known, and manuals were published for the instruction of midwives. The first book of this kind was by Eucharius Roslein, at Worms, called the Rose Garden for Midwives (1513). Vesalius (1543) rendered great services to the obstetric art by his anatomical teaching; and when Rousset published his treatise88, the operation became popular, and was constantly performed on the living subject, sometimes even when it was not absolutely necessary. Pineau, a surgeon of Paris, in 1589, first suggested division of the pubes to facilitate difficult labour.
In the year 1535 (27 Henry VIII.), Wood says847 that at Oxford “divers scholars, upon a foresight227 of the ruin of the clergy228, had and did now betake themselves to physick, who as yet raw and inexpert would adventure to practise, to the utter undoing229 of many. The said visitors ordered, therefore, that none should practise or exercise that faculty unless he had been examined by the physick professor concerning his knowledge therein. Which order, being of great moment, was the year following confirmed by the king, and power by him granted to the professor and successors to examine those that were to practise according to the Visitor’s Order.”
Pierre Franco (c. 1560) was a Swiss or French surgeon, and a famous lithotomist, who performed the high operation for the first time in 1560, with success, on a child aged213 two years. Recognising the dangers of this method, he introduced a new method in the operation known as perineal lithotomy, which was called the lateral230 method. He preceded Paré in improvements in dealing with strangulated hernia by the operation known as herniotomy. He was one of the first to re-introduce into midwifery practice the operation known as “turning,” in difficult labour. The operation was a familiar one amongst the Hindus, and had been known to the later Gr?co-Roman school, but had fallen into disuse until Paré, Franco, and Guillemeau devoted themselves to the improvement of this neglected branch of the healing art with great success.
Andrew Libavius (1546-1616), physician at Coburg, is said by363 Sprengel to have been the person who began to cultivate chemistry; as distinct from all theosophical fancies of his predecessors.
Conrad Gesner, the miracle of learning, whom we have already mentioned, devoted great attention to gyn?cology, and wrote learnedly and without prejudice upon medicine.
Dr. Henry Alkins (born 1558) was one of the principal physicians of James I. While president of the Royal College, the first London Pharmacop?ia was published in 1618.
John Bannister was a voluminous writer on surgery who practised in London, and wrote a treatise on surgery in 1575.
Thomas Gale (1507-1586), the “English Paré,” was a military surgeon, under Henry VIII. and Elizabeth, who taught that gun-shot wounds were not poisoned as was commonly supposed, but were to be treated as ordinary wounds.
William Bulleyn (died 1576) was a famous physician and botanist in the reigns231 of the later Tudors. He wrote The Government of Health (1548), Book of Simples, and other works.
Frescatorius (1483-1553) was the first to publish a description of typhus fever. Dr. Mead232 says848 that he knew that “consumption is contagious233, and is contracted by living with a phthisical person, by the gliding234 of the corrupted235 and putrified juices [of the sick] into the lungs of the sound man.” He inferred the microbes which we see.
Alexander Benedetti (died 1525) was an anatomist, who made important observations on gall-stones.
Felix Platter (1536-1614), a professor at Basle, must ever be gratefully remembered for his humane237 and wise opposition238 to the cruel treatment of the insane by coercive measures, which unhappily were in fashion up to recent times. He suggested the division of diseases into three classes: (1) Mental disorders; (2) Pains, fevers, etc.; (3) Deformities and defects of secretion239.
A book which contains directions for identifying simples and preparing compound medicines is called a Pharmacop?ia. The first work of this character, which was published under Government authority, was that of Nuremberg, in 1512. A student, Valerius Cordus, passing through the city, exhibited a recipe book, which he had compiled from the writings of the most eminent physicians of the town. He was urged to print it for the benefit of the apothecaries240. The College of Medicine at Florence issued the Antidotarium Florentinum, somewhat earlier,364 but merely on its own authority. Dr. A. Foes241 used the term pharmacop?ia first as a distinct title for his work published at Basle, in 1561.849
Costanzo Varolius of Bologna (1545-1575), one of the greatest of the Italian anatomists, described the optic nerves and many important points in the anatomy of the brain.
Volcher Coiter, of Groningen (1534-1600), was a pupil of Fallopius and Eustachius, who was distinguished for his important researches on the cartilages, bones, nerves, and the anatomy of the f?tal skeleton.
Fabricius, of Acquapendente (1537-1619), a pupil of Fallopius, and a distinguished anatomist, made important researches on the structure of animals in general. His famous discovery of the valves of the veins and his investigations concerning their use led Harvey to make the discovery of the circulation of the blood.
Casserius (1561-1616) investigated the anatomy of the vocal242 organs, discovered the muscles of the ossicles of the ear, and practised bronchotomy, which he had learned from Fabricius. He was professor at Padua, and a teacher of Harvey.
Spigel (1578-1625) made researches on the liver, a lobulus of which bears his name.
Olaus Worm (1588-1654) first described the small bones of the skull, now called “Wormian” bones.
It was not till the sixteenth century that France contributed her quota243 to the list of great anatomists. Nothing shows more clearly the difficulty with which learning was spread in the times of which we write than the fact that the works of the early Italian anatomists were altogether unknown in France until a hundred years after they were written.
Jacques Dubois (1478-1555) taught anatomy at Paris, and was professor of surgery to the Royal College. He was an irrational244 admirer of Galen. The carcases of dogs and other animals were the materials from which he taught; it does not appear that it was possible to obtain human subjects for dissection without robbing the cemeteries245.
Charles Etienne (1503-64) was the first to detect valves in the orifices of the hepatic veins. He knew nothing of the researches of Achillini concerning the brain, although they were made sixty years before; yet his investigations of the structure of the nervous system were most important, and his demonstration247 of the existence of a canal running through the whole length of the spinal248 cord, which had not previously249 been suspected, entitles him to a high place in the history of anatomy.
365
A new era in the history of anatomy was inaugurated by the appearance of Andrew Vesalius (1514-1564), a Fleming, who pursued the study with the greatest assiduity at Venice, and demonstrated it at Padua before he was twenty-two. He remained there seven years, then went to Bologna and thence to Pisa. He is known as the first author of a systematic112 and comprehensive view of human anatomy. He recognised the necessity of divesting250 the science of the current misrepresentations of ignorance and fancy.
Vesalius especially contributed to our knowledge of the circulatory organs; it was he who, by his study of the structure of the heart and the mechanism251 of its valves, stimulated252 his pupils and fellow-students to pursue a course of research which ended at last in Harvey’s immortal discovery. Besides these researches on the vascular253 system, he first accurately described the sphenoid bone and the sternum. He described the omentum, the pylorus, the mediastinum and pleura, and gave the fullest description of the brain which, up to that time, had appeared. Splendid as were his researches, and valuable as were his writings, it was perhaps by the way in which he stimulated inquiry in others that he rendered the greatest services to anatomical science.
Dr. Molony, writing in the British Medical Journal, December 31, 1892, says: “I recently secured possession of his works, entitled Andre? Vesalii Invictissimi Caroli V. Imperatoris Medici Opera Omnia. It is a curious work in two immense folio volumes, written in fairly good Latin. It has several plates representing the surgical instruments of the period, dissections, and, it must be added, quadrupeds of all sorts tied up evidently awaiting vivisection.
“The preface consists of a lengthy254 and appreciative255 life of Vesalius, from which it seems that he was born in 1514, at Brussels, where his father was court physician. As a boy he seems to have shown a taste for comparative anatomy, ‘puer animalium penetralia nudare atque viscera inspicere soleret.’ His anatomical studies were at all times pursued under difficulties. He obtained the bodies of criminals by bribing256 the judges, ‘corpora nactus eorum, in cubicula vexit, suosque in usus per tres et ultra septimanas asservavit. Horretne legenti animus257? O juvenilis ardor258, repagula eluctatur ferrea! Tali opus erat ingenio, artibus bis, at nobile conderet opus.’ He does not seem to have been married, if we may judge from the following extract: ‘Aetate vero integra, uxore, liberis, rei familiaris omni cura liber, totum se immersit in anatomicis.’
“Vesalius was an enthusiastic surgeon, and apparently259 looked down upon the physicians of the period: ‘Jocatus medicos reliquos syrupis pr?scribendis unice occupari.’ His success aroused the jealousy260 of his366 contemporaries. Among others he came into collision with Sylvius of Paris, Eustachius of Rome, and Fallopius of Padua. Mention is also made of ‘Joannis Caji Medici Celebris Britanni.’ It would be interesting to ascertain261 who this was. [No doubt it was Caius.]
“The end of Vesalius was tragic262 enough. ‘Hispanum curabat nobilem petiit ab amicis defuncti corpus aperire ut mortis scrutaretur causam. Quo concesso, visum cor in aperto jam pectore adhuc palpitans.’ The punishment ordered for this was a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. On his return voyage he was wrecked263 on the island of Zacinthus. ‘Inops, in loco solitario, omnique carens subsidio miserabiliter vitam finivit 1564.’”
“Vesalius,” says Portal, “appears to me one of the greatest men who ever existed. Let the astronomers264 vaunt their Copernicus, the natural philosophers their Galileo and Torricelli, the mathematicians265 their Pascal, the geographers266 their Columbus, I shall always place Vesalius above all their heroes. The first study for man is man. Vesalius has this noble object in view, and has admirably attained267 it; he has made on himself and his fellows such discoveries as Columbus could only make by travelling to the extremity268 of the world. The discoveries of Vesalius are of direct importance to man; by acquiring fresh knowledge of his own structure, man seems to enlarge his existence; while discoveries in geography or astronomy affect him but in a very indirect manner.”
The zeal219 of Vesalius and his fellow-students of anatomy often led them to weird269 adventures. Hallam says:850 “they prowled by night in charnel-houses, they dug up the dead from the graves, they climbed the gibbet, in fear and silence, to steal the mouldering270 carcase of the murderer; the risk of ignominious271 punishment, and the secret stings of superstitious272 remorse273, exalting274 no doubt the delight of these useful but not very enviable pursuits.” Vesalius, as has been said above, was once absurdly accused of dissecting275 a Spanish gentleman before he was dead. He only escaped the punishment of death by undertaking276 a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, during which he was shipwrecked, and died of famine in one of the Greek islands.851
Gabriel Fallopius (1523-1562) was a prominent pupil of Vesalius who studied the anastomoses (the blending together) of the blood-vessels. His researches in the anatomy of the bones and the internal ear greatly advanced anatomical knowledge. He discovered the tubes connected with the womb, called after him the “Fallopian tubes.” Fallopius is described as a savant distinguished by his sense of justice, his modesty367 and gentleness; yet Dr. Baas says,852 “the fact that even Fallopio did not shrink from accepting the gift of some convicts, and then poisoning them—indeed, when the first experiment proved a failure, he tried it again with better success—is characteristic of the zeal of the age in the investigation of the human body, and of the barbarous idea that might makes right towards those guilty before the law!”
Eustachius was a contemporary of Vesalius. He divides with him the honour of having created the science of human anatomy. His name is perpetuated277 by the tube in the internal ear, called the “Eustachian tube.” His researches on the anatomy of the internal part of the organ of hearing, his studies in the anatomy of the teeth, in which he was the pioneer, his famous Anatomical Engravings, and his labours in connection with the intimate structure of the organs of the body, taken in connection with their relative anatomy, prove that he laboured for the advancement278 of the knowledge of the structure of the human frame with the utmost assiduity and success.
J. C. Aranzi (1530-1589), of Bologna, gave the first correct account of the anatomy of the f?tus, and his description of that of the brain is exceedingly minute and lucid279. He named the hippocampus, described the choroid plexus, and the fourth ventricle under the name of the cistern280 of the cerebellum.
Columbus (died 1559) was a pupil of Vesalius, whom he succeeded in the chair of anatomy at Padua. He had a glimpse of how the blood passes from the right to the left side of the heart, but he had no true knowledge of the circulation.
Michael Servetus (1511-1553) was either a pupil or fellow-student of Vesalius, who, in 1553, described accurately the pulmonary circulation. He recognised that the change from venous into arterial blood took place in the lungs, and not in the left ventricle. He was a pioneer in physiological281 science by his great discovery of the respiratory changes in the lungs.
Levasseur (about 1540), says Hallam,853 appears to have known the circulation of the blood through the lungs, the valves of the veins, and their direction and purpose.
Gaspare Tagliacozzi (1546-1599) was a professor at Bologna, whose name is famous in the history of surgery from his skill in performing “plastic operations.” Rhinoplastic operation is a term in surgery sometimes synonymous with the Taliacotian operation, which is a process for forming an artificial nose. It consists in bringing down a piece of flesh from the forehead, and while preserving its attachment282 to the living368 structures, causing it to adhere to the anterior283 part of the remains284 of the nose. Tagliacozzi, himself, to replace the lost substance employed the skin of the upper part of the arm, as Branca did previously. Patients flocked to him from all parts of Europe. The world was, as usual, ungrateful; the great surgeon was considered to have presumptuously285 interfered with the authority of Providence286. Noses and lips which the Divinity had destroyed as a punishment for the sins of men had been restored by this daring man. After his death some nuns287 heard voices in their convent crying for several weeks: “Tagliacozzi is damned!” By the direction of the clergy of Bologna his corpse288 was taken from the grave and re-interred in unconsecrated ground.854 We are not in a position to sneer289 at this, for the preachers of the nineteenth century said something very similar of the use of chloroform in midwifery only a few years ago. In 1742 the Faculty of Paris declared Tagliacozzi’s operation impossible; but the English journals, in 1794, discovered that such a method of surgical procedure had been in use in India from ancient times, and then the scientific world tried the experiment and succeeded perfectly290.
Ambroise Paré, “the father of French surgery” (1509-1590), availed himself of the opportunities offered him in military surgery during the campaign of Francis I. in Piedmont. It was the practice of the time to treat gunshot wounds with hot oil—a treatment which Paré revolutionized by using merely a simple bandage.
In 1545 he attended the lectures of Sylvius at Paris, and became prosector to that great anatomist. His book on Anatomy was published five years later. By his employment of the ligature for large arteries, he was able so completely to control h?morrhage that he was able to practise amputation291 on a larger scale than had before been attempted. Paré is considered as the first who regularly employed the ligature after amputation. He declares in his Apologie that the invention was due to the ancients, and he explains their use of it, although he ascribes to inspiration of the Deity292 his own first adoption293 of the practice.
The philosopher Ramus in 1562 urged Charles IX. of France to establish schools for clinical teaching, such as already existed at Padua.
Robert Fludd, M.D., or in the Latin style he affected, Robertus de Fluctibus, was born in 1574; he was an ardent supporter of the Rosicrucian philosophy. He had a strong leaning towards chemistry, but had little faith in orthodox medicine. His medical ideas consisted of a mysterious mixture of divinity, chemistry, natural philosophy, and metaphysics.
In 1573, Harrison, in his unpublished Chronologie, remarks that369 “these daies the taking in of the smoke of the Indian herb called tabaco, by an instrument like a little ladell, is gretly taken up and used in England against rewmes.”
It was not till 1576 that croup was well understood. La?nnec thinks it was quite unknown to the Greek and Arabian physicians; but Forbes says that it was known to Hippocrates and Aret?us, although its pathology was not understood. Ballonius was the first who accurately described the false membrane294, which is a characteristic of the disease.855
At the Reformation in England under Elizabeth, some of the Catholic priests who refused to conform to the new religion sought in other professions the means of living. In a curious old book, Tom of all Trades, or the Plaine Pathway to Preferment, by Thomas Powell (printed 1631), there is a story which no doubt was founded in fact. “And heere I remember me of an old tale following, viz., At the beginning of the happy raigne of our late good Queene Elizabeth, divers Commissioners296 of great place, being authorized297 to enquire298 of, and to displace, all such of the Clergie as would not conforme to the reformed Church, one amongst others was Conuented before them, who being asked whether he would subscribe299 or no, denied it, and so consequently was adiudged to lose his benefice and to be deprived his function; wherevpon, in his impatience300, he said, ‘That if they (meaning the Commissioners) held this course it would cost many a man’s life.’ For which the Commissioners called him backe againe, and charged him that he had spoke83 treasonable and seditious words, tending to the raysing of a rebellion or some tumult301 in the Land; for which he should receive the reward of a Traytor. And being asked whether hee spake those words or no, he acknowledged it, and tooke vpon him the Iustification thereof; ‘for, said he, ‘yee have taken from me my liuing and profession of the Ministrie; Schollership is all my portion, and I have no other meanes now left for my maintenance but to turn Phisition; and before I shalbe absolute Master of that Misterie (God he knowes) how many mens lives it will cost. For few Phisitions vse to try experiments vpon their owne bodies.’
“With vs, it is a Profession can maintaine but a few. And diuers of those more indebted to opinion than learning, and (for the most part) better qualified302 in discoursing303 their travailes than in discerning their patients malladies. For it is growne to be a very huswiues trade, where fortune prevailes more than skill.”
A writer in Hood’s Every-Day Book, on the date February 25, says that the monks304 knew of more than three hundred species of medicinal plants which were used in general for medicines by the370 religious orders before the Reformation. The Protestants, the more efficiently305 to root out Popery, changed the Catholic names of many of these. Thus the virgin’s bower306 of the monastic physician was changed into flammula Jovis; the hedge hyssop into gratiola; St. John’s wort became hypericum; fleur de St. Louis was called iris307; palma Christi became ricinus; Our Master wort was christened imperatona; sweet bay they called laurus; Our Lady’s smock was changed into cardamine; Solomon’s seal into convallaria; Our Lady’s hair into trichomanes; balm into melissa; marjoram into origanum; herb Trinity into viola tricolor; knee holy into rascus; rosemary into rosmarinus; marygold into calendula; and a hundred others. But the old Catholic names cling to the plants of the cottage garden, and Star of Bethlehem has not quite given place to ornithogalum; Star of Jerusalem to goat’s beard; nor Lent lily to daffodil.
The gullibility308 of mankind has never been exhibited in a clearer light than Johann Valentin Andre? (1586-1654) succeeded in showing in his elaborate joke of the Society of the Rosy-Cross. In 1614 a famous but entirely fabulous309 secret society set the scholars of Europe discussing the pretensions310 of the Rosicrucians, who were said to have derived311 their origin from one Christian Rosenkreuz, two hundred years previously. This philosopher, it was said, had made a pilgrimage to the East, to learn its hidden wisdom, of which the art of making gold was a portion. The character of the society was Christian, but anti-Catholic, and its ostensible312 objects were the study of philosophy and the gratuitous84 healing of the sick. Its device was a cross, with four red roses. Andre? was a learned man, but jocular withal; for no sooner had the public eagerly swallowed his story, than he confessed the whole was pure invention, and that he had originated the idea with the view of ridiculing313 the alchemists and Theosophists, whose opinions were dominating European society. The public, however, liked the idea so well that it developed and flourished, and a society was established called Fraternitas Ros? Crucis. The most celebrated followers of the Rosicrucians were Valentine Wiegel, Jacob Boehm, Egidius Gutman, Michael Mayer, Oswald Crollius, and Robert Fludd.856
De Quincey has traced the connection between the Rosicrucians and Freemasons. “Rosicrucianism,” he says, “it is true, is not Freemasonry, but the latter borrowed its form from the first.”857
Scrofula was anciently treated in a superstitious manner by the sovereigns of England and France by imposition of hands. This ceremony is said to have been first performed by Edward the Confessor371 (1042-1066). A special “Service of Healing” was used in the English Church in the reign of Henry VIII. (1484-1509).
The ceremonies of blessing314 cramp-rings on Good Friday, called the Hallowing of the Cramp-Rings, is described by Bishop Percy in his Northumberland Household Book,858 where we have the following account:—
“And then the Usher315 to lay a Carpett for the Kinge to Creepe to the Crosse upon. And that done, there shal be a Forme sett upon the Carpett, before the Crucifix, and a Cushion laid upon it for the King to kneale upon. And the Master of the Jewell Howse ther to be ready with the Booke concerninge the Hallowing of the Crampe Rings, and Amner (Almoner) muste kneele on the right hand of the Kinge, holdinge the sayde booke. When that is done the King shall rise and goe to the Alter, wheare a Gent. Usher shall be redie with a Cushion for the Kinge to kneele upon; and then the greatest Lords that shall be ther to take the Bason with the Rings and beare them after the Kinge to offer.”
In the Harleian Manuscripts there is a letter from Lord Chancellor316 Hatton to Sir Thomas Smith, dated Sept, 11th, 158-, about a prevailing317 epidemic318, and enclosing a ring for Queen Elizabeth to wear between her breasts, the said ring having “the virtue to expell infectious airs.”859
Andrew Boorde, in his Introduction to Knowledge (1547-48), says: “The Kynges of England by the power that God hath gyuen to them, dothe make sicke men whole of a sickeness called the kynges euyll. The Kynges of England doth halowe euery yere crampe rynges, the whyche rynges, worne on ones fynger, dothe helpe them the whyche hath the crampe.”860
Concerning the king’s evil, which Boorde explains is an “euyl sickenes or impediment,” he advises: “For this matter let euery man make frendes to the Kynges maiestie, for it doth pertayne to a Kynge to helpe this infirmitie by the grace the whiche is geuen to a Kynge anoynted.”861
In Robert Laneham’s letter862 about Queen Elizabeth’s visit to Kenilworth Castle, it is told how on July 18th, 1575, her Majesty319 touched for the evil, and that it was “a day of grace.”372 “By her highnes accustumed mercy and charitee, nyne cured of the peynfull and daungerous diseaz, called the kings euill; for that Kings and Queenz of this Realm withoout oother medsin (saue only by handling and prayerz) only doo cure it.”
Sir John Fortescue, in his defence of the House of Lancaster against that of York, argued that the crown could not descend320 to a female because the Queen is not qualified by the form of anointing her to cure the disease called the king’s evil. On this account, and more especially after the excommunication of Elizabeth by the Pope in 1570, it must have been eminently321 comforting to all concerned to find that the power to cure disease by the royal touch had not been affected by the change of religion or any other cause. The practice was at its height in the reign of Charles II.863
Lord Braybrooke says,864 “In the first four years after his restoration he ‘touched’ nearly 24,000 people.” We find that Dr. Johnson was touched by Queen Anne. “The Office for the Healing” continued to be printed in the Book of Common Prayer after the accession of the House of Hanover.
The custom evidently arose from the fact that Edward the Confessor was a saint as well as a king. William of Malmesbury gives the origin of the royal touch in his account of the miracles of Edward: “A young woman had married a husband of her own age, but having no issue by the union, the humours collecting abundantly about her neck, she had contracted a sore disorder102, the glands swelling322 in a dreadful manner. Admonished324 in a dream to have the part affected washed by the king, she entered the palace, and the king himself fulfilled this labour of love, by rubbing the woman’s neck with his fingers dipped in water. Joyous325 health followed his healing hand; the lurid326 skin opened, so that worms flowed out with the purulent matter, and the tumour327 subsided328. But as the orifice of the ulcers329 was large and unsightly, he commanded her to be supported at the royal expense till she should be perfectly cured. However, before a week was expired, a fair new skin returned, and hid the scars so completely, that nothing of the original wound could be discovered; and within a year becoming the mother of twins, she increased the admiration330 of Edward’s holiness. Those who knew him more intimately, affirm that he often cured this complaint in Normandy; whence appears how false is their notion, who in our times assert, that the cure of this disease does not proceed from personal sanctity, but from hereditary331 virtue in the royal line.”865
Many other miracles of healing were attributed to St. Edward. Jeremy Collier866 maintains that the scrofula miracle is hereditary upon373 all his successors. The curious fact, however, is that the hereditary right of succession was repeatedly interrupted, yet the power remained. In connection with this royal touching, pieces of gold were given by the sovereigns to be worn by the patients as amulets332. They were called “touching pieces,” and though not absolutely requisite for the cure, some persons declared that the disease returned if they lost the coins. We can only account for the great efficacy which in some cases seemed to have attended the royal treatment, by the confidence and exalted333 expectation awakened334 in the sufferers by the ceremony, which acted as a tonic335 to the system, and roused the patients’ imagination to contribute to their own cure.867
Chips and handkerchiefs dipped in the blood of King Charles I. are said to have been efficacious in curing sick persons in hundreds of cases.
The College of Physicians of Edinburgh was created by the king’s letters patent in 1581, one year after the foundation of Edinburgh University by James VI.
In the reign of Elizabeth, when physicians rode on horseback, they were seated sideways; many of them carried muffs, to keep their fingers warm when they had to feel their patient’s pulse. Twice a year everybody was bled—a system which must have caused many disorders.
Fifteen centuries after the age of Celsus, with the revival336 of learning and science came the revival of human vivisection. Vesalius, as above mentioned, is known to have vivisected men; and in the Storia Universale of Cesare Cantù there is an account of the Duke of Florence giving a man for vivisection to Fallopius. This incident has been disputed; but the following series of cases, extracted by Professor Andreozzi from the Criminal Archives of Florence, and published by him in his book Leggi Penali degli antichi e Cinesi, are beyond question. Cosmo de Medici seems to have taken the anatomists of Pisa under his special favour, and to have sent them the miserable338 convicts from the prisons at his option. The following examples are a selection from the cases extracted by Signor Andreozzi from the Archivio Criminale:—
“1. January 15th, 1545.—Santa di Mariotto Tarchi di Mugello, wife of Bastiano Lucchese, was condemned to be beheaded for infanticide. Under the sentence is written, ‘Dicta Santa, de mente Excellmi Ducis, fuit missa Pisis, de ea per doctores fieret notomia.’[No notice to be found of any execution of the woman, such as would have appeared had she been put to death before she was sent to Pisa.]
“2. December 14th, 1547.—Giulio Mancini Sanese was condemned374 for robbery and other offences. Sent to Pisa to be anatomised. ‘Ducatur Pisis, pro1 faciendo de eo notomia.’
“3. In the record of prisoners sent away, dated September 1st, 1551, occurs this entry:—‘Letter to the Commissioner295 of Castrocaro, that Maddalena, who is imprisoned339 for killing340 her son, should be sent here, if she be likely to recover, as it pleases S.?E. that she should be reserved for anatomy. Of this nothing is to be said, but she is to be kept in hopes. If she is not likely to recover, the executioner is to be sent for to decapitate her.’ The end of the horrible extract is,—‘Went to Pisa, to be made an anatomy.’
“4. December 12th, 1552.—A man named Zuccheria, accused of piracy341, was reserved from hanging, with his comrade, and sent to Pisa, ‘per la notomia.’
“5. December 22nd, 1552.—A certain Ulivo di Paolo was condemned by the Council of Eight to be hanged for poisoning his wife. Sentence changed—to be sent for anatomy. Was sent to Pisa on January 13th.
“6. November 14th, 1553.—Marguerita, wife of Biajio d’Antinoro, condemned to be beheaded for infanticide.... December 20th, ‘she was released from the fetters342 and consigned343 to a familiar, who took her to Pisa to the Commissario, who gave her, as usual, to the anatomist, to make anatomy of her; which was done’ (‘che la consegni, secondo il solito, al notomista, per farne notomia, come fu fatto’).”
“Several other cases, from 1554 to 1570, are recorded, with equally unmistakable exactitude. In one instance the condemned man’s destiny was mitigated345, and after having been ordered to be sent to Pisa for the Commissario to consign344 to the anatomist, ‘when he should ask for him, and at his pleasure,’ he was mercifully sentenced to be hanged at once at Vico, ‘by direction of Sua Excellenza Illustrissima.’ Two unfortunate thieves, Paoli di Giovanni and Vestrino d’Agnolo, were sent together by the Council of Eight to be anatomised; the Duke having written to say ‘that they wanted in Pisa a subject for anatomy.’”
After the date 1570 no more cases occur in the Archives.
Francis I. invited the Italian anatomist Vidus Vidius to his royal college at Paris.
Several new medicines were introduced about this period.
Lemon juice was first spoken of as a remedy for scurvy346 in 1564. Its use was discovered by some Dutch sailors whose ship was laden347 with lemons and oranges from Spain.868
The virtues348 of sassafras as a medicine for scurvy were discovered, according to Cartier, in 1536, on a voyage to explore the coast of375 Newfoundland and the St. Lawrence. The natives advised the sailors afflicted349 with the malady to use the wood of the tree ameda, which was thought to have been sassafras.869
Sarsaparilla was first brought to Europe by the Spaniards, in the middle of the sixteenth century, from Peru and Brazil.
Guaiacum was introduced into Europe in 1509, and in 1519 its use became common.
Holinshed complained870 that estimation and credit given to compound medicines made with foreign drugs in his time was one great cause of the prevailing ignorance of the virtues and uses of “our own simples,” which he held to be fully as useful as the “salsa parilla, mochoacan, etc.,” so much in request. “We tread those herbs under our feet, whose forces, if we knew and could apply them to our necessities, we would honour and have in reverence350.—Alas! what have we to do with such Arabian and Grecian stuff as is daily brought from those parts which lie in another clime?—The bodies of such as dwell there are of another constitution than ours are here at home. Certes, they grow not for us, but for the Arabians and Grecians.—Among the Indians, who have the most present cures for every disease of their own nation, there is small regard of compound medicines, and less of foreign drugs, because they neither know them nor can use them, but work wonders even with their own simples.”
Carlo Ruini, of Bologna, published in 1598 a work on the anatomy of the horse, in which Ercolani has found evidence that he, to some extent, anticipated Harvey’s discovery.871
Nicholas Houel (1520-1585) was born at Paris, 1520. He was a famous and learned pharmacien, who devoted the fortune which he acquired by his industry and skill to philanthropic and scientific purposes. He founded a great orphanage351 in Paris, and the School of Pharmacy of that city owes its origin to him. He wrote a Treatise on the Plague, and one on the Theriacum of Mithridates, both published in 1573. It is to his enlightened and charitable suggestion that dispensaries arose in Paris. His “Garden of Simples” inspired the creation of the Jardin des Plantes.872
Even at the close of the sixteenth century careful and sober men, as Mr. Henry Morley says,873 believed in the miraculous352 properties of plants and animals and parts of animals. When the century commenced, the learned and unlearned alike believed in the influences of the stars and the interferences of demons246 with diseases, and in the mysteries of magic.376 The reason why students of such sciences as existed were punished and persecuted353 was the dread323 which men had that the knowledge of the occult powers of nature would afford the learner undue354 and mysterious power over them.
Legal Medicine.
That most important branch of medical science known as Medical Jurisprudence, or Forensic355 Medicine, first took its rise in Germany, and, later, was recognised as a necessary branch of study in England. Briefly356 this science may be described as “that branch of State medicine which treats of the application of medical knowledge to the purposes of the law.” It embraces all questions affecting the civil or social rights of individuals, and of injuries to the person. Although we find traces of the first principles of this science in ancient times, especially in connection with legitimacy357, feigned358 diseases, etc., it is by no means certain that even in Rome the law required any medical inspection359 of dead bodies. The science dates only from the sixteenth century. The Bishop of Bamberg, in 1507, introduced a penal337 code requiring the production of medical evidence in certain cases. In 1532, Charles V. induced the Diet of Ratison to adopt a code in which magistrates360 were ordered to call medical evidence in cases of personal injuries, infanticide, pretended pregnancy, simulated diseases, and poisoning. The actual birth of forensic medicine, however, did not take place until the publication, in Germany, in 1553, of the Constitutio Criminalis Carolina.874 The difficulties which the infant science had to contend against may be estimated from the fact that a few years later a physician named Weiker, who declared that witches and demoniacs were simply persons afflicted with hypochondriasis and hysteria, and should not be punished, was with difficulty saved from the stake by his patron, William, Duke of Cleves.
Ambrose Paré wrote on monsters, simulated diseases, and the art of drawing up medico-legal reports.
In 1621-35 Paulo Zacchia, of Rome, published a work entitled Qu?stiones Medico-Legales, which inaugurated a new era in the history of Forensic Medicine. He exhibited immense research in this classical work, the materials for which he collected from 460 authors. Considering that chemistry and physiology361 were then so imperfectly understood, such a work is a proof of the learning and sagacity of the author.
In 1663 the Danish physician Bartholin proposed the hydrostatic test for the determination of live-birth, the method used to-day in examining the lungs of an infant to discover whether the child was born alive or not, by observing whether they float or sink in water.
![](../../../skin/default/image/4.jpg)
点击
收听单词发音
![收听单词发音](/template/default/tingnovel/images/play.gif)
1
pro
![]() |
|
n.赞成,赞成的意见,赞成者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
influenza
![]() |
|
n.流行性感冒,流感 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
continental
![]() |
|
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
touching
![]() |
|
adj.动人的,使人感伤的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
sect
![]() |
|
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
liberated
![]() |
|
a.无拘束的,放纵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
investigators
![]() |
|
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
bondage
![]() |
|
n.奴役,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
doctrine
![]() |
|
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
doctrines
![]() |
|
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
gale
![]() |
|
n.大风,强风,一阵闹声(尤指笑声等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
overthrown
![]() |
|
adj. 打翻的,推倒的,倾覆的 动词overthrow的过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
renaissance
![]() |
|
n.复活,复兴,文艺复兴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
inquiry
![]() |
|
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
prows
![]() |
|
n.船首( prow的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
vessel
![]() |
|
n.船舶;容器,器皿;管,导管,血管 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
anatomy
![]() |
|
n.解剖学,解剖;功能,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
slumber
![]() |
|
n.睡眠,沉睡状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
investigation
![]() |
|
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
delusions
![]() |
|
n.欺骗( delusion的名词复数 );谬见;错觉;妄想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
pharmacy
![]() |
|
n.药房,药剂学,制药业,配药业,一批备用药品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
creeds
![]() |
|
(尤指宗教)信条,教条( creed的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
withering
![]() |
|
使人畏缩的,使人害羞的,使人难堪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
desolating
![]() |
|
毁坏( desolate的现在分词 ); 极大地破坏; 使沮丧; 使痛苦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
foul
![]() |
|
adj.污秽的;邪恶的;v.弄脏;妨害;犯规;n.犯规 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
stagnant
![]() |
|
adj.不流动的,停滞的,不景气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
marshes
![]() |
|
n.沼泽,湿地( marsh的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
wholesome
![]() |
|
adj.适合;卫生的;有益健康的;显示身心健康的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
demon
![]() |
|
n.魔鬼,恶魔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
savage
![]() |
|
adj.野蛮的;凶恶的,残暴的;n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
poetic
![]() |
|
adj.富有诗意的,有诗人气质的,善于抒情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
renovating
![]() |
|
翻新,修复,整修( renovate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
banished
![]() |
|
v.放逐,驱逐( banish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
civilized
![]() |
|
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
atheism
![]() |
|
n.无神论,不信神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
followers
![]() |
|
追随者( follower的名词复数 ); 用户; 契据的附面; 从动件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
atheist
![]() |
|
n.无神论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
martyr
![]() |
|
n.烈士,殉难者;vt.杀害,折磨,牺牲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
philosophic
![]() |
|
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
witty
![]() |
|
adj.机智的,风趣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
scoffer
![]() |
|
嘲笑者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
corruptions
![]() |
|
n.堕落( corruption的名词复数 );腐化;腐败;贿赂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
exhuming
![]() |
|
v.挖出,发掘出( exhume的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
celebrated
![]() |
|
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
mighty
![]() |
|
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
monastery
![]() |
|
n.修道院,僧院,寺院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
wondrous
![]() |
|
adj.令人惊奇的,奇妙的;adv.惊人地;异乎寻常地;令人惊叹地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
devout
![]() |
|
adj.虔诚的,虔敬的,衷心的 (n.devoutness) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
worthy
![]() |
|
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
remarkable
![]() |
|
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
disapprove
![]() |
|
v.不赞成,不同意,不批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
entirely
![]() |
|
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
condemned
![]() |
|
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
liberating
![]() |
|
解放,释放( liberate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
adept
![]() |
|
adj.老练的,精通的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57
itinerant
![]() |
|
adj.巡回的;流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59
meditates
![]() |
|
深思,沉思,冥想( meditate的第三人称单数 ); 内心策划,考虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60
converse
![]() |
|
vi.谈话,谈天,闲聊;adv.相反的,相反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61
boors
![]() |
|
n.农民( boor的名词复数 );乡下佬;没礼貌的人;粗野的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62
scraps
![]() |
|
油渣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63
interrogated
![]() |
|
v.询问( interrogate的过去式和过去分词 );审问;(在计算机或其他机器上)查询 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64
detested
![]() |
|
v.憎恶,嫌恶,痛恨( detest的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65
bent
![]() |
|
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66
inspector
![]() |
|
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67
idol
![]() |
|
n.偶像,红人,宠儿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68
lighting
![]() |
|
n.照明,光线的明暗,舞台灯光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69
chafing
![]() |
|
n.皮肤发炎v.擦热(尤指皮肤)( chafe的现在分词 );擦痛;发怒;惹怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70
predecessors
![]() |
|
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71
exhumed
![]() |
|
v.挖出,发掘出( exhume的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72
morbid
![]() |
|
adj.病的;致病的;病态的;可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73
seclusion
![]() |
|
n.隐遁,隔离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74
cloisters
![]() |
|
n.(学院、修道院、教堂等建筑的)走廊( cloister的名词复数 );回廊;修道院的生活;隐居v.隐退,使与世隔绝( cloister的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75
standing
![]() |
|
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76
crucibles
![]() |
|
n.坩埚,严酷的考验( crucible的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77
deluded
![]() |
|
v.欺骗,哄骗( delude的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78
forth
![]() |
|
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79
tinged
![]() |
|
v.(使)发丁丁声( ting的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80
arrogance
![]() |
|
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81
maze
![]() |
|
n.迷宫,八阵图,混乱,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82
forsakes
![]() |
|
放弃( forsake的第三人称单数 ); 弃绝; 抛弃; 摒弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83
spoke
![]() |
|
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84
gratuitous
![]() |
|
adj.无偿的,免费的;无缘无故的,不必要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85
interfere
![]() |
|
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86
investigations
![]() |
|
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87
skull
![]() |
|
n.头骨;颅骨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88
treatise
![]() |
|
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89
treatises
![]() |
|
n.专题著作,专题论文,专著( treatise的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90
incurable
![]() |
|
adj.不能医治的,不能矫正的,无救的;n.不治的病人,无救的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91
zinc
![]() |
|
n.锌;vt.在...上镀锌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92
concoctions
![]() |
|
n.编造,捏造,混合物( concoction的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93
filth
![]() |
|
n.肮脏,污物,污秽;淫猥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94
filthy
![]() |
|
adj.卑劣的;恶劣的,肮脏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95
transfusion
![]() |
|
n.输血,输液 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96
dealing
![]() |
|
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97
arsenic
![]() |
|
n.砒霜,砷;adj.砷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98
combustion
![]() |
|
n.燃烧;氧化;骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99
coagulation
![]() |
|
n.凝固;凝结物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100
digestion
![]() |
|
n.消化,吸收 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101
disorders
![]() |
|
n.混乱( disorder的名词复数 );凌乱;骚乱;(身心、机能)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102
disorder
![]() |
|
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103
perverted
![]() |
|
adj.不正当的v.滥用( pervert的过去式和过去分词 );腐蚀;败坏;使堕落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104
deceptions
![]() |
|
欺骗( deception的名词复数 ); 骗术,诡计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105
quacks
![]() |
|
abbr.quacksalvers 庸医,骗子(16世纪习惯用水银或汞治疗梅毒的人)n.江湖医生( quack的名词复数 );江湖郎中;(鸭子的)呱呱声v.(鸭子)发出嘎嘎声( quack的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106
rehabilitating
![]() |
|
改造(罪犯等)( rehabilitate的现在分词 ); 使恢复正常生活; 使恢复原状; 修复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107
ardent
![]() |
|
adj.热情的,热烈的,强烈的,烈性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108
imbued
![]() |
|
v.使(某人/某事)充满或激起(感情等)( imbue的过去式和过去分词 );使充满;灌输;激发(强烈感情或品质等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109
penetrated
![]() |
|
adj. 击穿的,鞭辟入里的 动词penetrate的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110
reign
![]() |
|
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111
naturalist
![]() |
|
n.博物学家(尤指直接观察动植物者) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112
systematic
![]() |
|
adj.有系统的,有计划的,有方法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113
botanist
![]() |
|
n.植物学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114
Founder
![]() |
|
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115
substantiated
![]() |
|
v.用事实支持(某主张、说法等),证明,证实( substantiate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116
arteries
![]() |
|
n.动脉( artery的名词复数 );干线,要道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117
veins
![]() |
|
n.纹理;矿脉( vein的名词复数 );静脉;叶脉;纹理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118
skilful
![]() |
|
(=skillful)adj.灵巧的,熟练的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119
cardinal
![]() |
|
n.(天主教的)红衣主教;adj.首要的,基本的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120
Christian
![]() |
|
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121
immortal
![]() |
|
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122
detrimental
![]() |
|
adj.损害的,造成伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123
delightful
![]() |
|
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124
faculty
![]() |
|
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125
wrought
![]() |
|
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126
compilations
![]() |
|
n.编辑,编写( compilation的名词复数 );编辑物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127
rheumatism
![]() |
|
n.风湿病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128
thighs
![]() |
|
n.股,大腿( thigh的名词复数 );食用的鸡(等的)腿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129
affected
![]() |
|
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130
delirium
![]() |
|
n. 神智昏迷,说胡话;极度兴奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131
glands
![]() |
|
n.腺( gland的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132
inflamed
![]() |
|
adj.发炎的,红肿的v.(使)变红,发怒,过热( inflame的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133
malady
![]() |
|
n.病,疾病(通常做比喻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134
loathing
![]() |
|
n.厌恶,憎恨v.憎恨,厌恶( loathe的现在分词);极不喜欢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135
purgative
![]() |
|
n.泻药;adj.通便的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136
constellations
![]() |
|
n.星座( constellation的名词复数 );一群杰出人物;一系列(相关的想法、事物);一群(相关的人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137
alleging
![]() |
|
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138
practitioners
![]() |
|
n.习艺者,实习者( practitioner的名词复数 );从业者(尤指医师) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139
preamble
![]() |
|
n.前言;序文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140
requisite
![]() |
|
adj.需要的,必不可少的;n.必需品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141
weavers
![]() |
|
织工,编织者( weaver的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142
witchcraft
![]() |
|
n.魔法,巫术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143
noxious
![]() |
|
adj.有害的,有毒的;使道德败坏的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144
infamy
![]() |
|
n.声名狼藉,出丑,恶行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145
specially
![]() |
|
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146
enacted
![]() |
|
制定(法律),通过(法案)( enact的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147
bishop
![]() |
|
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148
faculties
![]() |
|
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149
discretion
![]() |
|
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150
monarchs
![]() |
|
君主,帝王( monarch的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151
purely
![]() |
|
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152
exempted
![]() |
|
使免除[豁免]( exempt的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153
enjoyment
![]() |
|
n.乐趣;享有;享用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154
dissection
![]() |
|
n.分析;解剖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155
legislative
![]() |
|
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156
enactment
![]() |
|
n.演出,担任…角色;制订,通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157
dressings
![]() |
|
n.敷料剂;穿衣( dressing的名词复数 );穿戴;(拌制色拉的)调料;(保护伤口的)敷料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158
trumpery
![]() |
|
n.无价值的杂物;adj.(物品)中看不中用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159
rust
![]() |
|
n.锈;v.生锈;(脑子)衰退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160
nay
![]() |
|
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161
surgical
![]() |
|
adj.外科的,外科医生的,手术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162
vexed
![]() |
|
adj.争论不休的;(指问题等)棘手的;争论不休的问题;烦恼的v.使烦恼( vex的过去式和过去分词 );使苦恼;使生气;详细讨论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163
divers
![]() |
|
adj.不同的;种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164
ordained
![]() |
|
v.任命(某人)为牧师( ordain的过去式和过去分词 );授予(某人)圣职;(上帝、法律等)命令;判定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165
lawful
![]() |
|
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166
statute
![]() |
|
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167
pestilence
![]() |
|
n.瘟疫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169
dwellings
![]() |
|
n.住处,处所( dwelling的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170
draughts
![]() |
|
n. <英>国际跳棋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171
sanitary
![]() |
|
adj.卫生方面的,卫生的,清洁的,卫生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172
prescriptions
![]() |
|
药( prescription的名词复数 ); 处方; 开处方; 计划 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173
seethe
![]() |
|
vi.拥挤,云集;发怒,激动,骚动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174
pint
![]() |
|
n.品脱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175
tartness
![]() |
|
n.酸,锋利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176
pimples
![]() |
|
n.丘疹,粉刺,小脓疱( pimple的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177
amend
![]() |
|
vt.修改,修订,改进;n.[pl.]赔罪,赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178
repression
![]() |
|
n.镇压,抑制,抑压 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179
Oxford
![]() |
|
n.牛津(英国城市) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180
distinguished
![]() |
|
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181
monk
![]() |
|
n.和尚,僧侣,修道士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182
buffoon
![]() |
|
n.演出时的丑角 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183
genial
![]() |
|
adj.亲切的,和蔼的,愉快的,脾气好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184
possessed
![]() |
|
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185
rambling
![]() |
|
adj.[建]凌乱的,杂乱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186
revels
![]() |
|
n.作乐( revel的名词复数 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉v.作乐( revel的第三人称单数 );狂欢;着迷;陶醉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187
wardens
![]() |
|
n.看守人( warden的名词复数 );管理员;监察员;监察官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188
warden
![]() |
|
n.监察员,监狱长,看守人,监护人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189
monasteries
![]() |
|
修道院( monastery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190
rogues
![]() |
|
n.流氓( rogue的名词复数 );无赖;调皮捣蛋的人;离群的野兽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191
lodging
![]() |
|
n.寄宿,住所;(大学生的)校外宿舍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192
needy
![]() |
|
adj.贫穷的,贫困的,生活艰苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193
rascals
![]() |
|
流氓( rascal的名词复数 ); 无赖; (开玩笑说法)淘气的人(尤指小孩); 恶作剧的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194
devoted
![]() |
|
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195
butts
![]() |
|
笑柄( butt的名词复数 ); (武器或工具的)粗大的一端; 屁股; 烟蒂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196
lodged
![]() |
|
v.存放( lodge的过去式和过去分词 );暂住;埋入;(权利、权威等)归属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197
Augmented
![]() |
|
adj.增音的 动词augment的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198
eminent
![]() |
|
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199
interfered
![]() |
|
v.干预( interfere的过去式和过去分词 );调停;妨碍;干涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200
munificent
![]() |
|
adj.慷慨的,大方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201
gratitude
![]() |
|
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202
inscribed
![]() |
|
v.写,刻( inscribe的过去式和过去分词 );内接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203
humility
![]() |
|
n.谦逊,谦恭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204
virtue
![]() |
|
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205
lasting
![]() |
|
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206
linguist
![]() |
|
n.语言学家;精通数种外国语言者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207
applied
![]() |
|
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208
impugning
![]() |
|
v.非难,指谪( impugn的现在分词 );对…有怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209
humbly
![]() |
|
adv. 恭顺地,谦卑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210
heresy
![]() |
|
n.异端邪说;异教 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211
apothecary
![]() |
|
n.药剂师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212
incompetent
![]() |
|
adj.无能力的,不能胜任的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213
aged
![]() |
|
adj.年老的,陈年的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214
magnetism
![]() |
|
n.磁性,吸引力,磁学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215
botanists
![]() |
|
n.植物学家,研究植物的人( botanist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216
naturalists
![]() |
|
n.博物学家( naturalist的名词复数 );(文学艺术的)自然主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217
esteemed
![]() |
|
adj.受人尊敬的v.尊敬( esteem的过去式和过去分词 );敬重;认为;以为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218
ornament
![]() |
|
v.装饰,美化;n.装饰,装饰物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219
zeal
![]() |
|
n.热心,热情,热忱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220
zealous
![]() |
|
adj.狂热的,热心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221
accurately
![]() |
|
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222
rectified
![]() |
|
[医]矫正的,调整的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223
perplexed
![]() |
|
adj.不知所措的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224
peril
![]() |
|
n.(严重的)危险;危险的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225
pregnancy
![]() |
|
n.怀孕,怀孕期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226
engraving
![]() |
|
n.版画;雕刻(作品);雕刻艺术;镌版术v.在(硬物)上雕刻(字,画等)( engrave的现在分词 );将某事物深深印在(记忆或头脑中) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227
foresight
![]() |
|
n.先见之明,深谋远虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228
clergy
![]() |
|
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229
undoing
![]() |
|
n.毁灭的原因,祸根;破坏,毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230
lateral
![]() |
|
adj.侧面的,旁边的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231
reigns
![]() |
|
n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 );君主统治时期;任期;当政期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232
mead
![]() |
|
n.蜂蜜酒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233
contagious
![]() |
|
adj.传染性的,有感染力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234
gliding
![]() |
|
v. 滑翔 adj. 滑动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235
corrupted
![]() |
|
(使)败坏( corrupt的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)腐化; 引起(计算机文件等的)错误; 破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236
whooping
![]() |
|
发嗬嗬声的,发咳声的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237
humane
![]() |
|
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238
opposition
![]() |
|
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239
secretion
![]() |
|
n.分泌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240
apothecaries
![]() |
|
n.药剂师,药店( apothecary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241
foes
![]() |
|
敌人,仇敌( foe的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242
vocal
![]() |
|
adj.直言不讳的;嗓音的;n.[pl.]声乐节目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243
quota
![]() |
|
n.(生产、进出口等的)配额,(移民的)限额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244
irrational
![]() |
|
adj.无理性的,失去理性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245
cemeteries
![]() |
|
n.(非教堂的)墓地,公墓( cemetery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246
demons
![]() |
|
n.恶人( demon的名词复数 );恶魔;精力过人的人;邪念 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247
demonstration
![]() |
|
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248
spinal
![]() |
|
adj.针的,尖刺的,尖刺状突起的;adj.脊骨的,脊髓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249
previously
![]() |
|
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250
divesting
![]() |
|
v.剥夺( divest的现在分词 );脱去(衣服);2。从…取去…;1。(给某人)脱衣服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251
mechanism
![]() |
|
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252
stimulated
![]() |
|
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253
vascular
![]() |
|
adj.血管的,脉管的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254
lengthy
![]() |
|
adj.漫长的,冗长的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255
appreciative
![]() |
|
adj.有鉴赏力的,有眼力的;感激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256
bribing
![]() |
|
贿赂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257
animus
![]() |
|
n.恶意;意图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258
ardor
![]() |
|
n.热情,狂热 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259
apparently
![]() |
|
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260
jealousy
![]() |
|
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261
ascertain
![]() |
|
vt.发现,确定,查明,弄清 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262
tragic
![]() |
|
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263
wrecked
![]() |
|
adj.失事的,遇难的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264
astronomers
![]() |
|
n.天文学者,天文学家( astronomer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265
mathematicians
![]() |
|
数学家( mathematician的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266
geographers
![]() |
|
地理学家( geographer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267
attained
![]() |
|
(通常经过努力)实现( attain的过去式和过去分词 ); 达到; 获得; 达到(某年龄、水平、状况) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268
extremity
![]() |
|
n.末端,尽头;尽力;终极;极度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269
weird
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,离奇的;怪诞的,神秘而可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270
mouldering
![]() |
|
v.腐朽( moulder的现在分词 );腐烂,崩塌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271
ignominious
![]() |
|
adj.可鄙的,不光彩的,耻辱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272
superstitious
![]() |
|
adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273
remorse
![]() |
|
n.痛恨,悔恨,自责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274
exalting
![]() |
|
a.令人激动的,令人喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275
dissecting
![]() |
|
v.解剖(动物等)( dissect的现在分词 );仔细分析或研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276
undertaking
![]() |
|
n.保证,许诺,事业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277
perpetuated
![]() |
|
vt.使永存(perpetuate的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278
advancement
![]() |
|
n.前进,促进,提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279
lucid
![]() |
|
adj.明白易懂的,清晰的,头脑清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280
cistern
![]() |
|
n.贮水池 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281
physiological
![]() |
|
adj.生理学的,生理学上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282
attachment
![]() |
|
n.附属物,附件;依恋;依附 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283
anterior
![]() |
|
adj.较早的;在前的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284
remains
![]() |
|
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285
presumptuously
![]() |
|
adv.自以为是地,专横地,冒失地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286
providence
![]() |
|
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287
nuns
![]() |
|
n.(通常指基督教的)修女, (佛教的)尼姑( nun的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288
corpse
![]() |
|
n.尸体,死尸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289
sneer
![]() |
|
v.轻蔑;嘲笑;n.嘲笑,讥讽的言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290
perfectly
![]() |
|
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291
amputation
![]() |
|
n.截肢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292
deity
![]() |
|
n.神,神性;被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293
adoption
![]() |
|
n.采用,采纳,通过;收养 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294
membrane
![]() |
|
n.薄膜,膜皮,羊皮纸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295
commissioner
![]() |
|
n.(政府厅、局、处等部门)专员,长官,委员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296
commissioners
![]() |
|
n.专员( commissioner的名词复数 );长官;委员;政府部门的长官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297
authorized
![]() |
|
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298
enquire
![]() |
|
v.打听,询问;调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299
subscribe
![]() |
|
vi.(to)订阅,订购;同意;vt.捐助,赞助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300
impatience
![]() |
|
n.不耐烦,急躁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301
tumult
![]() |
|
n.喧哗;激动,混乱;吵闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302
qualified
![]() |
|
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303
discoursing
![]() |
|
演说(discourse的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304
monks
![]() |
|
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305
efficiently
![]() |
|
adv.高效率地,有能力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306
bower
![]() |
|
n.凉亭,树荫下凉快之处;闺房;v.荫蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307
iris
![]() |
|
n.虹膜,彩虹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308
gullibility
![]() |
|
n.易受骗,易上当,轻信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309
fabulous
![]() |
|
adj.极好的;极为巨大的;寓言中的,传说中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310
pretensions
![]() |
|
自称( pretension的名词复数 ); 自命不凡; 要求; 权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311
derived
![]() |
|
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312
ostensible
![]() |
|
adj.(指理由)表面的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313
ridiculing
![]() |
|
v.嘲笑,嘲弄,奚落( ridicule的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314
blessing
![]() |
|
n.祈神赐福;祷告;祝福,祝愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315
usher
![]() |
|
n.带位员,招待员;vt.引导,护送;vi.做招待,担任引座员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316
chancellor
![]() |
|
n.(英)大臣;法官;(德、奥)总理;大学校长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317
prevailing
![]() |
|
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318
epidemic
![]() |
|
n.流行病;盛行;adj.流行性的,流传极广的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319
majesty
![]() |
|
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320
descend
![]() |
|
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321
eminently
![]() |
|
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322
swelling
![]() |
|
n.肿胀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323
dread
![]() |
|
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324
admonished
![]() |
|
v.劝告( admonish的过去式和过去分词 );训诫;(温和地)责备;轻责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325
joyous
![]() |
|
adj.充满快乐的;令人高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326
lurid
![]() |
|
adj.可怕的;血红的;苍白的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327
tumour
![]() |
|
n.(tumor)(肿)瘤,肿块 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328
subsided
![]() |
|
v.(土地)下陷(因在地下采矿)( subside的过去式和过去分词 );减弱;下降至较低或正常水平;一下子坐在椅子等上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329
ulcers
![]() |
|
n.溃疡( ulcer的名词复数 );腐烂物;道德败坏;腐败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330
admiration
![]() |
|
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331
hereditary
![]() |
|
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332
amulets
![]() |
|
n.护身符( amulet的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333
exalted
![]() |
|
adj.(地位等)高的,崇高的;尊贵的,高尚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334
awakened
![]() |
|
v.(使)醒( awaken的过去式和过去分词 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335
tonic
![]() |
|
n./adj.滋补品,补药,强身的,健体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336
revival
![]() |
|
n.复兴,复苏,(精力、活力等的)重振 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337
penal
![]() |
|
adj.刑罚的;刑法上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338
miserable
![]() |
|
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339
imprisoned
![]() |
|
下狱,监禁( imprison的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340
killing
![]() |
|
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341
piracy
![]() |
|
n.海盗行为,剽窃,著作权侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342
fetters
![]() |
|
n.脚镣( fetter的名词复数 );束缚v.给…上脚镣,束缚( fetter的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343
consigned
![]() |
|
v.把…置于(令人不快的境地)( consign的过去式和过去分词 );把…托付给;把…托人代售;丟弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344
consign
![]() |
|
vt.寄售(货品),托运,交托,委托 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345
mitigated
![]() |
|
v.减轻,缓和( mitigate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346
scurvy
![]() |
|
adj.下流的,卑鄙的,无礼的;n.坏血病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347
laden
![]() |
|
adj.装满了的;充满了的;负了重担的;苦恼的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348
virtues
![]() |
|
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349
afflicted
![]() |
|
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350
reverence
![]() |
|
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351
orphanage
![]() |
|
n.孤儿院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352
miraculous
![]() |
|
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353
persecuted
![]() |
|
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354
undue
![]() |
|
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355
forensic
![]() |
|
adj.法庭的,雄辩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356
briefly
![]() |
|
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357
legitimacy
![]() |
|
n.合法,正当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358
feigned
![]() |
|
a.假装的,不真诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359
inspection
![]() |
|
n.检查,审查,检阅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360
magistrates
![]() |
|
地方法官,治安官( magistrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361
physiology
![]() |
|
n.生理学,生理机能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |