But while I have thus sought to dispose my book in its proper form as a collection of essays on a variety of distinct, though related, topics, I have at the same time preserved its unity19, as far as possible, by retaining the original title for the whole series of volumes, and by pointing out from time to time the bearing of my general conclusions on the particular problem which furnished the starting-point of the enquiry. It seemed to me that this mode of presenting the subject offered some advantages which outweighed20 certain obvious drawbacks. By discarding the austere21 form, without, I hope, sacrificing the solid substance, of a scientific treatise, I thought to cast my materials into a more artistic22 mould and so perhaps to attract readers, who might have been repelled23 by a more strictly24 logical and systematic25 arrangement of the facts. Thus I put the mysterious priest of Nemi, so to say, in the forefront of the picture, grouping the other sombre figures of the same sort behind him in the background, not certainly because I deemed them of less moment but because the picturesque26 natural surroundings of the priest of Nemi among the wooded hills of Italy, the very mystery which enshrouds him, and not least the haunting magic of Virgil’s verse, all combine to shed a glamour27 on the tragic28 figure with the Golden Bough, which fits him to {ix} stand as the centre of a gloomy canvas. But I trust that the high relief into which he has thus been thrown in my pages will not lead my readers either to overrate his historical importance by comparison with that of some other figures which stand behind him in the shadow, or to attribute to my theory of the part he played a greater degree of probability than it deserves. Even if it should appear that this ancient Italian priest must after all be struck out from the long roll of men who have masqueraded as gods, the single omission29 would not sensibly invalidate the demonstration30, which I believe I have given, that human pretenders to divinity have been far commoner and their credulous31 worshippers far more numerous than had been hitherto suspected. Similarly, should my whole theory of this particular priesthood collapse—and I fully32 acknowledge the slenderness of the foundations on which it rests—its fall would hardly shake my general conclusions as to the evolution of primitive religion and society, which are founded on large collections of entirely33 independent and well-authenticated facts.
Friends versed34 in German philosophy have pointed35 out to me that my views of magic and religion and their relations to each other in history agree to some extent with those of Hegel. The agreement is quite independent and to me unexpected, for I have never studied the philosopher’s writings nor attended to his speculations36. As, however, we have arrived at similar results by very different roads, the partial coincidence of our conclusions may perhaps be taken to furnish a certain presumption37 in favour of their truth. To enable my readers to judge of the extent of the coincidence, I have given in an appendix some extracts from Hegel’s lectures on the philosophy of religion. The curious may compare them with my chapter on Magic and Religion, which was written in ignorance of the views of my illustrious predecessor8.
With regard to the history of the sacred kingship which {x} I have outlined in these volumes, I desire to repeat a warning which I have given in the text. While I have shewn reason to think that in many communities sacred kings have been developed out of magicians, I am far from supposing that this has been universally true. The causes which have determined38 the establishment of monarchy39 have no doubt varied40 greatly in different countries and at different times: I make no pretence41 to discuss or even enumerate42 them all: I have merely selected one particular cause because it bore directly on my special enquiry; and I have laid emphasis on it because it seems to have been overlooked by writers on the origin of political institutions, who, themselves sober and rational according to modern standards, have not reckoned sufficiently43 with the enormous influence which superstition44 has exerted in shaping the human past. But I have no wish to exaggerate the importance of this particular cause at the expense of others which may have been equally or even more influential45. No one can be more sensible than I am of the risk of stretching an hypothesis too far, of crowding a multitude of incongruous particulars under one narrow formula, of reducing the vast, nay46 inconceivable complexity47 of nature and history to a delusive48 appearance of theoretical simplicity49. It may well be that I have erred50 in this direction again and again; but at least I have been well aware of the danger of error and have striven to guard myself and my readers against it. How far I have succeeded in that and the other objects I have set before me in writing this work, I must leave to the candour of the public to determine.
J. G. FRAZER.
CAMBRIDGE, 5th December 1910.

点击
收听单词发音

1
bough
![]() |
|
n.大树枝,主枝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
antiquity
![]() |
|
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
formerly
![]() |
|
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
forth
![]() |
|
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
prospects
![]() |
|
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
lured
![]() |
|
吸引,引诱(lure的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
primitive
![]() |
|
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
predecessor
![]() |
|
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
predecessors
![]() |
|
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
ponderous
![]() |
|
adj.沉重的,笨重的,(文章)冗长的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
treatise
![]() |
|
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
dissertations
![]() |
|
专题论文,学位论文( dissertation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
swollen
![]() |
|
adj.肿大的,水涨的;v.使变大,肿胀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
accretion
![]() |
|
n.自然的增长,增加物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
decided
![]() |
|
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
taboo
![]() |
|
n.禁忌,禁止接近,禁止使用;adj.禁忌的;v.禁忌,禁制,禁止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
devoted
![]() |
|
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
dealing
![]() |
|
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
unity
![]() |
|
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
outweighed
![]() |
|
v.在重量上超过( outweigh的过去式和过去分词 );在重要性或价值方面超过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
austere
![]() |
|
adj.艰苦的;朴素的,朴实无华的;严峻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
artistic
![]() |
|
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
repelled
![]() |
|
v.击退( repel的过去式和过去分词 );使厌恶;排斥;推开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
strictly
![]() |
|
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
systematic
![]() |
|
adj.有系统的,有计划的,有方法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
picturesque
![]() |
|
adj.美丽如画的,(语言)生动的,绘声绘色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
glamour
![]() |
|
n.魔力,魅力;vt.迷住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
tragic
![]() |
|
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
omission
![]() |
|
n.省略,删节;遗漏或省略的事物,冗长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
demonstration
![]() |
|
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
credulous
![]() |
|
adj.轻信的,易信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
entirely
![]() |
|
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
versed
![]() |
|
adj. 精通,熟练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
pointed
![]() |
|
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
speculations
![]() |
|
n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 );思考;投机活动;推断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
presumption
![]() |
|
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
determined
![]() |
|
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
monarchy
![]() |
|
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
varied
![]() |
|
adj.多样的,多变化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
pretence
![]() |
|
n.假装,作假;借口,口实;虚伪;虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
enumerate
![]() |
|
v.列举,计算,枚举,数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
sufficiently
![]() |
|
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
superstition
![]() |
|
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
influential
![]() |
|
adj.有影响的,有权势的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
nay
![]() |
|
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
complexity
![]() |
|
n.复杂(性),复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
delusive
![]() |
|
adj.欺骗的,妄想的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
simplicity
![]() |
|
n.简单,简易;朴素;直率,单纯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
erred
![]() |
|
犯错误,做错事( err的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |