There seems to be an ineradicable malignancy in the heart of professional Christianity. St. Paul, indeed in a fine passage of his first epistle to the Corinthians, speaks with glowing eloquence2 of the "charity" which "thinketh no evil." But the hireling advocates and champions of Christianity have ever treated the apostle's counsel with contempt in their dealings with sceptics and heretics. Public discussion is avoided by these professors of the gospel of love and practisers of the gospel of hatred3. They find it "unprofitable." Consequently they neglect argument and resort to personalities4. They frequently insinuate5, and when it is safe they openly allege6, that all who do not share their opinions are bad husbands, bad fathers, bad citizens, and bad men. Thus they cast libellous dust in the eyes of their dupes, and incapacitate them from seeing the real facts of the case for themselves. A notable illustration of this evil principle may be found in a recent speech by the Bishop7 of Chester. Dr. Jayne presided at a Town Hall meeting of the local branch of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, and took advantage of the occasion to slander8 a considerable section of his fellow citizens. With a pious9 arrogance10 which is peculiar11 to his boastful faith, he turned what should have been a humanitarian12 assembly into a receptacle for his discharge of insolent13 fanaticism15. Parentage is a natural fact, and the love of offspring is a well-nigh universal law of animal life. It would seem, therefore, that a Society for preventing cruelty to children by parents of perverted16 instincts, might live aloof17 from sectarian squabbles. But the Bishop of Chester is of a different opinion. He is a professional advocate of one form of faith, and his eye is strictly18 bent19 on business. He appears to be unable to talk anything but "shop." Even while pressing the claims of poor, neglected, ill-used children on the sympathy and assistance of a generous public, he could not refrain from insulting all those who have no love for his special line of business. And the insult was not only gratuitous20; it was groundless, brutal21, and malignant22; so much so, indeed, that we cherish a hope that the Bishop has overreached himself, and that his repulsive23 slander will excite a re-action in favor of the objects of his malice24.
Dr. Jayne told the meeting that "the persons who were most liable to be guilty of cruelty to their children were those artisans who had taken up Secularist26 opinions, and who looked upon their children as a nuisance, and were glad to get them out of the way."
Now, on the face of it, the statement is positively27 grotesque28 in its absurdity29. If Secular25 principles tend to make parents hate their own children, why should their evil influence be confined to artisans? And if Secular principles do not produce parental30 hatred in the wealthier classes, why does Dr. Jayne hurl31 this disgraceful accusation32 at the poorer class of unbelievers? It cannot be simply because they are poorer, for he was delighted to know that "poverty by no means necessarily meant cruelty." What, then, is the explanation? It seems to us very obvious. Dr. Jayne was bent on libelling sceptics, and, deeming it safer to libel the poorer ones, he tempered his valor33 with a convenient amount of discretion34. He is not even a brave fanatic14. His bigotry35 is crawling, cowardly, abject36, and contemptible37.
Dr. Jayne relied upon the authority of Mr. Waugh, who happened to be present at the meeting. This gentleman jumped up in the middle of the Bishop's speech, and said "it was the case, that the class most guilty of cruelty to children were those who took materialistic38, atheistic39, selfish and wicked views of their own existence." Surely this is a "fine derangement41 of epitaphs." It suggests that Mr. Waugh is less malignant than foolish. What connection does he discover between Secularism42 and selfishness? Is it in our principles, in our objects, or in our policy? Does he really imagine that the true character of any body of men and women is likely to be written out by a hostile partisan43? Such a person might be a judge of our public actions, and we are far from denying his right to criticise44 them; but when he speaks of our private lives, before men of his own faith, and without being under the necessity of adducing a single scrap45 of evidence, it is plain to the most obtuse46 intelligence that his utterances47 are perfectly48 worthless.
We have as much right as Mr. Waugh to ask the world to accept our view of the private life of Secularists. That is, we have no right at all. Nevertheless we have a right to state our experience and leave the reader to form his own opinion. Having entered the homes of many Secularists, we have been struck with their fondness for children The danger lies, if it lies anywhere, in their tendency to "spoil" them. It is a curious fact—and we commend it to the attention of Dr. Jayne and Mr. Waugh—that the most sceptical country in Europe is the one where children are the best treated, and where there is no need for a Society to save them from the clutches of cruelty. There is positively a child-cultus in the great French cities, and especially in Freethinking Paris. In this Bible-and-beer-loving land the workman, like his social "superior," stands or sits drinking in a public-house with male cronies; but the French workman usually sits at the cafe table with his wife, and on Sundays with his children, and takes his drink, whatever it may be, under the restraining eyes of those before whom a man is least ready to debase himself.
One Secular home, at least, is known to us intimately. It is the home of the present writer, who for the moment drops the editorial "we" and speaks in the first person My children are the children of an Atheist40, yet if they do not love me as heartily49 as Dr. Jayne's or Mr. Waugh's children love their father, "there's witchcraft50 in it." There is no rod, and no punishment in my home. We work with the law of love. Striking a child is to me a loathsome51 idea. I shrink from it as I would from a physical pollution. Strike a child once, be brutal to it once, and there is gone forever that look of perfect trust in the child's eyes, which is a parent's dearest possession, and which I would not forfeit52 for all the prizes in the world.
I know Christians53 who are less kind to their children than I am to mine. They are not my natural inferiors. Humanity forbid that I should play the Pharisee! But they are degraded below their natural level by the ghastly notion of parental "authority" I do not say there are no rights in a family. There are; and there are also duties. But all the rights belong to the children, and all the duties belong to the parents.
Personally I am not fond of talking about myself. Still less am I anxious to make a public exhibition of my home. But if the Dr. Jaynes and the Mr. Waughs of the Christian1 world provoke comparisons, I have no fear of standing54 with my little ones opposite them with theirs, and letting the world judge between us.
Dropping again into the editorial style, we have a question to ask of the Bishop of Chester, or rather of Mr. Waugh. It is this. Where are the statistics to justify55 your assertion? Men who are sent to gaol56, for whatever reason, have their religions registered. Give us, then, the total number of convictions your Society has obtained, and the precise proportion of Secularists among the offenders57. And be careful to give us their names and the date and place of their conviction.
We have a further word to all sorts and conditions of libellous Christians. Where are the evidences of Atheistic cruelty? The humanest of the Roman emperors were those who were least under the sway of religion. Julius Caesar himself, the "foremost man of all this world," who was a professed58 Atheist, was also the most magnanimous victor that ever wore the purple. Akbar, the Freethinker, was the noblest ruler of India. Frederick the Great was kind and just to his subjects. But, on the other hand, who invented and who applied59 such instruments of cruelty as racks, wheels, and thumbscrews? Who invented separate tortures for every part of the sensitive frame of man? Who burnt heretics? Who roasted or drowned millions of "witches"? Who built dungeons60 and filled them? Who brought forth61 cries of agony from honest men and women that rang to the tingling62 stars? Who burnt Bruno? Who spat63 filth64 over the graves of Paine and Voltaire? The answer is one word—Christians. Yet with all this blood on their hands, and all this crime on their consciences, they turn round and fling the epithet65 of "cruel" at the perennial66 victims of their malice.

点击
收听单词发音

1
Christian
![]() |
|
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
eloquence
![]() |
|
n.雄辩;口才,修辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
hatred
![]() |
|
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
personalities
![]() |
|
n. 诽谤,(对某人容貌、性格等所进行的)人身攻击; 人身攻击;人格, 个性, 名人( personality的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
insinuate
![]() |
|
vt.含沙射影地说,暗示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
allege
![]() |
|
vt.宣称,申述,主张,断言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
bishop
![]() |
|
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
slander
![]() |
|
n./v.诽谤,污蔑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
pious
![]() |
|
adj.虔诚的;道貌岸然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
arrogance
![]() |
|
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
humanitarian
![]() |
|
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
insolent
![]() |
|
adj.傲慢的,无理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
fanatic
![]() |
|
n.狂热者,入迷者;adj.狂热入迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
fanaticism
![]() |
|
n.狂热,盲信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
perverted
![]() |
|
adj.不正当的v.滥用( pervert的过去式和过去分词 );腐蚀;败坏;使堕落 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
aloof
![]() |
|
adj.远离的;冷淡的,漠不关心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
strictly
![]() |
|
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
bent
![]() |
|
n.爱好,癖好;adj.弯的;决心的,一心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
gratuitous
![]() |
|
adj.无偿的,免费的;无缘无故的,不必要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
brutal
![]() |
|
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
malignant
![]() |
|
adj.恶性的,致命的;恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
repulsive
![]() |
|
adj.排斥的,使人反感的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
malice
![]() |
|
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
secular
![]() |
|
n.牧师,凡人;adj.世俗的,现世的,不朽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
secularist
![]() |
|
n.现世主义者,世俗主义者;宗教与教育分离论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
positively
![]() |
|
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
grotesque
![]() |
|
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
absurdity
![]() |
|
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
parental
![]() |
|
adj.父母的;父的;母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
hurl
![]() |
|
vt.猛投,力掷,声叫骂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
accusation
![]() |
|
n.控告,指责,谴责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
valor
![]() |
|
n.勇气,英勇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
discretion
![]() |
|
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
bigotry
![]() |
|
n.偏见,偏执,持偏见的行为[态度]等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
abject
![]() |
|
adj.极可怜的,卑屈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
contemptible
![]() |
|
adj.可鄙的,可轻视的,卑劣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
materialistic
![]() |
|
a.唯物主义的,物质享乐主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
atheistic
![]() |
|
adj.无神论者的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
atheist
![]() |
|
n.无神论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
derangement
![]() |
|
n.精神错乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
secularism
![]() |
|
n.现世主义;世俗主义;宗教与教育分离论;政教分离论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
partisan
![]() |
|
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44
criticise
![]() |
|
v.批评,评论;非难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
scrap
![]() |
|
n.碎片;废料;v.废弃,报废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
obtuse
![]() |
|
adj.钝的;愚钝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
utterances
![]() |
|
n.发声( utterance的名词复数 );说话方式;语调;言论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
perfectly
![]() |
|
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
heartily
![]() |
|
adv.衷心地,诚恳地,十分,很 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
witchcraft
![]() |
|
n.魔法,巫术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
loathsome
![]() |
|
adj.讨厌的,令人厌恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
forfeit
![]() |
|
vt.丧失;n.罚金,罚款,没收物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
Christians
![]() |
|
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
standing
![]() |
|
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
justify
![]() |
|
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
gaol
![]() |
|
n.(jail)监狱;(不加冠词)监禁;vt.使…坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57
offenders
![]() |
|
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58
professed
![]() |
|
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59
applied
![]() |
|
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60
dungeons
![]() |
|
n.地牢( dungeon的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61
forth
![]() |
|
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62
tingling
![]() |
|
v.有刺痛感( tingle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63
spat
![]() |
|
n.口角,掌击;v.发出呼噜呼噜声 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64
filth
![]() |
|
n.肮脏,污物,污秽;淫猥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65
epithet
![]() |
|
n.(用于褒贬人物等的)表述形容词,修饰语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66
perennial
![]() |
|
adj.终年的;长久的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |