Professor Mivart perceives, like the Bishop2 of Chester, that Christianity must alter its teaching with respect to Hell, or lose its hold on the educated, the thoughtful, and the humane3. "Not a few persons," he says, "have abandoned Christianity on account of this dogma." The "more highly evolved moral perceptions" of to-day are "shocked beyond expression at the doctrine4 that countless5 multitudes of mankind will burn for ever in hell fire, out of which there is no possible redemption." Father Pinamonti's Hell Open to Christians6 is stigmatised as "repulsive," and its pictures as "revolting." Yet it is issued "with authority," and Mr. Mivart falls short of the truth in admitting it has never "incurred7 any condemnation8." This little fact seems a barrier to his attempt at proving that the Catholic Church is not committed to the doctrine of a hell of real fire and everlasting9 agony.
"Abandon all hope, ye who enter here" wrote Dante over his Inferno10, and Mr. Mivart allows that "the words truly express what was the almost universal belief of Christians for many centuries." That belief flourished under the wing of an infallible Church; and now Mr. Mivart, a member of this same infallible Church, comes forward to declare that the belief was a mistake. Nevertheless, he argues, the clergy11 of former times did right to preach hell hot and strong, stuff it with fire, and keep it burning for ever. They had coarse and ignorant people to deal with, and were obliged to use realistic language. Besides, it was necessary to exaggerate, in order to bring out the infinite contrast between heaven and hell, the elect and the reprobates12, the saved and the damned. Mr. Mivart maintains, therefore, that the old representation of hell "has not caused the least practical error or misled anyone by one jot13 or tittle"—which is as bold, or, as some would say, as impudent14 a statement as could be well conceived.
Briefly15 stated, Mr. Mivart's contention16 is that the fire of hell is figurative. The pains of damnation, even in the case of the worst of sinners, have not been liberally described by Popes and Councils. "What is meant by the expression 'hell fire' has never been defined," says Mr. Mivart. Perhaps not. There are some things which, for practical purposes, do not need definition, and fire is one of them. Nor is it greatly to the purpose to say that "Saint Augustine distinctly declares our ignorance about it." Saint Augustine was not God Almighty17. Ample set-offs to this Father may be found in the pages of Dr. Pusey's What is of Faith as to Everlasting Punishment? Besides, if fire does not mean fire, if torment18 does not mean torment, and everlasting does not mean everlasting, perhaps hell does not mean hell; in which case, it is a waste of time to argue about details, when the whole establishment, to use a Shakespearian epithet19, is simply "tropical."
"Some positive suffering," thinks Mr. Mivart, "will never cease for those who have voluntarily and deliberately20 cast away from them their supreme21 beatitude." Do you want to know what this positive suffering is? Well, wait till you get there. All in good time. Whatever it is, the "unbelievers" will get their share of it. The editor of the Freethinker may look out for a double dose. Professor Huxley will not escape. He is an aggressive Agnostic; one of those persons who, in the graceful22 language of Mivartian civility, do not "possess even a rudiment23 of humility24 or aspiration25 after goodness." "Surely," exclaims our new Guide to Hell, "surely if there is a sin which, on merely Theistic principles, merits the severest pains of hell, it is the authorship of an irreligious book." Which leads us in turn to exclaim, "Surely, yea thrice surely, will hell never be wholly abolished or deprived of its last torture-chamber, while Christians require a painful place for those who boldly differ from them." Mr. Mivart, it is true, confesses that "those who are disturbed and distressed26 by difficulties about hell include many among the best of mankind." But they must not write irreligious books on the subject. They must wait, in patience and meekness27, until Mr. Mivart gives them satisfaction.
Let us now summarise28 Mr. Mivart's position. Uni-versalism, or the final restitution29 of all men, he rejects as "utterly30 irreconcilable31 with Catholic doctrine." Those who are saved go to heaven—after various delays in purgatory—and enjoy the Beatific32 Vision for ever. Those who are lost go to hell and remain there for all eternity33. They lose the Beatific Vision, and that is their chief punishment. But hell is not a really dreadful place—except, of course, for the writers of irreligious books. It may have its equator, and perhaps its poles; but between them are vast regions of temperate34 clime and grateful soil. The inhabitants are in a kind of harmony with their environment. They are even under a law of evolution, and "the existence of the damned is one of progress and gradual amelioration." We suppose it may be said, in the words of Napoleon, that the road is open to talent; and enterprising "damned ones" may cry with truth—"Better to reign35 in hell than serve in heaven."
Hell must be regarded as a most desirable place. Mr. Mivart knows all about it, and we have his authority for saying it is "an abode36 of happiness transcending37 all our most vivid anticipations38, so that man's natural capacity for happiness is there gratified to the very utmost." And this is hell! Well, as the old lady said, who would have thought it? Verily the brimstone has all turned to treacle39.
Curious! is it not? While the Protestants are discussing whether hell-fire is actual fire, and whether sinners are roasted for everlasting, or only for eternity, in steps a Catholic and declares that hell is a first-class sanitarium, far superior to the east-end of London, better than Bournemouth, and ahead of Naples and Mentone. "Be happy in heaven," he cries, "and if you won't, why, damn you, be happy in hell."
But before we leave Mr. Mivart we have a parting word to say. He admits the comparative novelty of his view of hell. "Our age," he says, "has developed not only a great regard for human life, but also for the sufferings of the brute40 creation." This has led to a moral revolt against the old doctrine of eternal torment, and the Church is under the necessity of presenting the idea of hell in a fresh and less revolting fashion. Precisely41 so. It is not theology which purifies humanity, but humanity which purifies theology. Man civilises himself first, and his gods afterwards, and the priest walks at the tail of the procession.*
* Professor Mivart is a man to be pitied. First of all, his
views on Hell were opposed by Father Clarke, against whom
the hell-reformer defended himself. Last of all, however,
Professor Mivart's articles on this subject were placed upon
the Index of Prohibited Books, which no good Catholic is
allowed to read, except by special permission. Rome had
spoken, and the Professor submitted himself to Holy Mother
on any question whatever, since he submits not to argument,
but to authority.
点击收听单词发音
1 layman | |
n.俗人,门外汉,凡人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bishop | |
n.主教,(国际象棋)象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 humane | |
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 incurred | |
[医]招致的,遭受的; incur的过去式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 condemnation | |
n.谴责; 定罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inferno | |
n.火海;地狱般的场所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 reprobates | |
n.道德败坏的人,恶棍( reprobate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 jot | |
n.少量;vi.草草记下;vt.匆匆写下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 impudent | |
adj.鲁莽的,卑鄙的,厚颜无耻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 contention | |
n.争论,争辩,论战;论点,主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 almighty | |
adj.全能的,万能的;很大的,很强的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 torment | |
n.折磨;令人痛苦的东西(人);vt.折磨;纠缠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 epithet | |
n.(用于褒贬人物等的)表述形容词,修饰语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 graceful | |
adj.优美的,优雅的;得体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 rudiment | |
n.初步;初级;基本原理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 humility | |
n.谦逊,谦恭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 aspiration | |
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 distressed | |
痛苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 meekness | |
n.温顺,柔和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 summarise | |
vt.概括,总结 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 restitution | |
n.赔偿;恢复原状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 irreconcilable | |
adj.(指人)难和解的,势不两立的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 beatific | |
adj.快乐的,有福的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 temperate | |
adj.温和的,温带的,自我克制的,不过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 abode | |
n.住处,住所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 transcending | |
超出或超越(经验、信念、描写能力等)的范围( transcend的现在分词 ); 优于或胜过… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 anticipations | |
预期( anticipation的名词复数 ); 预测; (信托财产收益的)预支; 预期的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 treacle | |
n.糖蜜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 brute | |
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |