Once upon a time I knew an Anarchist1 shoemaker, the same who had me sent to jail for playing tennis on Sunday, as I have narrated2 in "The Brass3 Check." I remember arguing with him concerning his ideas of sex, which were of the freest. I can hear the very tones of his voice as he put the great unanswerable question: "What are you going to do about the problem of jealousy4?" And I had no response at hand; for jealousy is truly a most cruel and devastating5 and unlovely emotion; and yet, how can you escape it, if you are going to preserve monogamy?
The Anarchist shoemaker's solution was to break down all the prejudices against sexual promiscuity6. Free and unlimited7 license8 was every person's right, and for any other person to interfere9 was enslavement, for any other person to criticize was superstition10. But the power of superstition is strong in the world, and the shoemaker found men resentful of his teachings, and disposed to confiscate11 the rights of their wives and daughters. Hence the shoemaker's disapproval12 of jealousy.
Other men, less purely13 physiological14 in their attitude to sex, have wrestled15 with this same problem of jealousy. H. G. Wells has a novel, "In the Days of the Comet," in which he portrays16 two men, both nobly and truly in love with the same woman. One in a passion of jealousy is about to murder the other, when a great social transformation17 is magically brought about, and the would-be murderer wakes up to universal love, and the two men nobly and lovingly share the same woman. Shelley also dreamed this dream, inviting18 two women to share him. I have known others who tried it, but never permanently19. I do not say that it never has succeeded, or that it never can succeed. In this book I am renouncing20 the future—I am trying to give practical advice to people, for the conduct of their lives here and now, and my advice on this point is that polygamous and polyandrous experiments in modern capitalist society cost more than they are worth.
I once knew a certain high school teacher, who believed religiously in every kind of freedom. When she married, she and her husband, an artist, made a vow21 against jealousy; but as it worked out, this vow meant that the wife had a steady job and took care of the husband, while he loafed and loved other women. When finally she grew tired of it, he accused her of being jealous; also, she had brought it down to the matter of money! I know another woman, an Anarchist, widely known as a lecturer on sex freedom. She laid down the general principle of unlimited personal freedom for all, and she tried to live up to her faith. She entered into a "free union" with a certain man, and when she discovered that he was making love to another woman, in the presence of a friend of mine she threw a vase of flowers at his head. You see, her general principles had clashed with another general principle, to the effect that a person who feels deep and strong love inevitably22 desires that love to endure, and cannot but suffer to see it preyed23 upon and destroyed.
Let us first consider the question, just what are the true and proper implications of monogamous love? The Roman Catholic church advocates "monogamy," and understands thereby24 that a man and woman pledge themselves "till death do us part," and if either of them cancels this arrangement it is adultery and mortal sin. I hope that none of my readers understands by "monogamy" any such system of spiritual strangulation. My own idea is rather what some churchman has sarcastically25 described by the term "progressive polygamy." I believe that a man and woman should pledge their faith in love, and should keep that faith, and endeavor with all their best energies to make a success of it; they should strive each to understand the other's needs, and unselfishly to fulfill26 them, within the limits of fair play. But if, after such an effort has been truly made, it becomes clear that the union does not mean health and happiness for one of the parties, that party has a right to withdraw from it, and for any government or church or other power to deny that right is both folly27 and cruelty.
Now, on the basis of this definition of monogamy—or, if you prefer, of progressive polygamy—we are in position to say what we think about jealousy. If two people pledge their faith, and one breaks it, and the other complains, we do not call that jealousy, but just common decency28. Neither do we call it jealousy if one expects the other to avoid the appearance of guilt29; for love is a serious thing, not to be played with, and I think that a person who truly loves will do everything possible to make clear to the beloved that he is keeping and means to keep the plighted30 faith.
You may say that I am using words arbitrarily, in endeavoring thus to distinguish between justifiable31 and unjustifiable jealousy, and calling the former by some other name. It does not make much difference about words, provided I make clear my meaning. I could point out a whole string of words which have good meanings and bad meanings, and cannot be discussed without preliminary explanations and distinctions; religion, for example, and morality, and aristocracy, and justice, to name only a few. Most people's thinking about marriage and love has been made like soup in a cheap restaurant, by dumping in all kinds of scraps32 and notions from such opposite poles of human thought as Christian33 monkery and Renaissance34 license, absurdly called "romance." So before you can do any thinking about a problem like jealousy, you have to agree to use the word to mean something definite, whether good or bad.
We shall take jealousy as a "bad" word, and use it to mean the setting up, by a man or woman, of some claim to the love of another person, which claim cannot be justified35 in the court of reason and fair play. This includes, in the first place, all claims based upon a courtship, not ratified36 by marriage. It is to the interest of society and the race that men and women should be free to investigate persons of the other sex, and to experiment with the affections before pledges of marriage are made. If sensible customs of love and just laws of marriage were made, there would be no excuse for a woman's giving herself to a man before marriage; she should be taught not to do it, and then if she does it, the risk is her own, and the disgusting perversion37 of venality38 and greed known as the "breach39 of promise suit" should be unknown in our law. The young should be taught that it is the other person's right to change his mind and withdraw at any time before marriage; whatever pains and pangs40 this may cause must be borne in silence.
The second kind of jealousy is that which seeks to keep in the marriage bond a person who is not happy in it and has asked to be released. The law sanctions this kind of cowardly selfishness, which manifests itself every day on the front pages of our newspapers—a spectacle of monstrous41 and loathsome42 passions unleashed43 and even glorified44. Husbands set the bloodhounds of the law after wives who have fled with some other man, and send the man to a cell, and drag the woman back to a loveless home. Wives engage private detectives, and trail their husbands to some "love nest," and then ensue long public wrangles45, with washing of filthy46 linen47, and the matter is settled by a "separation." The virtuous48 wife, who may have driven the man away by neglect or vanity or stupidity, is granted a share of his earnings49 for the balance of her life; and two more people are added to the millions who are denied sexual happiness under the law, and are thereby impelled50 to live as law violators.
For this there is only one remedy conceivable. We have banned cannibalism51 and slavery and piracy52 and duelling, and we must ban one more ancient and cruel form of human oppression, the effort to hold people in the bonds of sex by any other power save that of love. I am aware that the reactionaries53 who read this book will take this sentence out of its context and quote it to prove that I am a "free lover." I shall be sorry to have that done, but even so, I was not willing to live in slavery myself, and I am not willing to advocate it for others. I am aware that there are degenerate54 and defective55 individuals, and that we have to make special provision for them, as I shall presently set forth56; but the average, normal human being must be free to decide what is love for him, and what is happiness for him. Every person in the world will have to deny himself the right to demand love where love is not freely given, and all lovers in the world will have to hold themselves ready to let the loved one go if and when the loved one demands it. I am aware that this is a hard saying, and a hard duty, but it is one that life lays upon us, and one that there is no escaping.
点击收听单词发音
1 anarchist | |
n.无政府主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 narrated | |
v.故事( narrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 brass | |
n.黄铜;黄铜器,铜管乐器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 promiscuity | |
n.混杂,混乱;(男女的)乱交 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 license | |
n.执照,许可证,特许;v.许可,特许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 superstition | |
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 confiscate | |
v.没收(私人财产),把…充公 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 disapproval | |
n.反对,不赞成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 physiological | |
adj.生理学的,生理学上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 wrestled | |
v.(与某人)搏斗( wrestle的过去式和过去分词 );扭成一团;扭打;(与…)摔跤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 portrays | |
v.画像( portray的第三人称单数 );描述;描绘;描画 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 inviting | |
adj.诱人的,引人注目的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 permanently | |
adv.永恒地,永久地,固定不变地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 renouncing | |
v.声明放弃( renounce的现在分词 );宣布放弃;宣布与…决裂;宣布摒弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 vow | |
n.誓(言),誓约;v.起誓,立誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 preyed | |
v.掠食( prey的过去式和过去分词 );掠食;折磨;(人)靠欺诈为生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 sarcastically | |
adv.挖苦地,讽刺地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 fulfill | |
vt.履行,实现,完成;满足,使满意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 decency | |
n.体面,得体,合宜,正派,庄重 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 plighted | |
vt.保证,约定(plight的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 justifiable | |
adj.有理由的,无可非议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 scraps | |
油渣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 renaissance | |
n.复活,复兴,文艺复兴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 ratified | |
v.批准,签认(合约等)( ratify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 perversion | |
n.曲解;堕落;反常 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 venality | |
n.贪赃枉法,腐败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 breach | |
n.违反,不履行;破裂;vt.冲破,攻破 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 pangs | |
突然的剧痛( pang的名词复数 ); 悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 loathsome | |
adj.讨厌的,令人厌恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 unleashed | |
v.把(感情、力量等)释放出来,发泄( unleash的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 glorified | |
美其名的,变荣耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 wrangles | |
n.(尤指长时间的)激烈争吵,口角,吵嘴( wrangle的名词复数 )v.争吵,争论,口角( wrangle的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 filthy | |
adj.卑劣的;恶劣的,肮脏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 linen | |
n.亚麻布,亚麻线,亚麻制品;adj.亚麻布制的,亚麻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 earnings | |
n.工资收人;利润,利益,所得 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 impelled | |
v.推动、推进或敦促某人做某事( impel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 cannibalism | |
n.同类相食;吃人肉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 piracy | |
n.海盗行为,剽窃,著作权侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 reactionaries | |
n.反动分子,反动派( reactionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 degenerate | |
v.退步,堕落;adj.退步的,堕落的;n.堕落者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 defective | |
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |