And there was no alternative government. 72For generations the chief energies of Tsarism had been directed to destroying any possibility of an alternative government. It had subsisted8 on that one fact that, bad as it was, there was nothing else to put in its place. The first Russian Revolution, therefore, turned Russia into a debating society and a political scramble9. The liberal forces of the country, unaccustomed to action or responsibility, set up a clamorous10 discussion whether Russia was to be a constitutional monarchy11, a liberal republic, a socialist12 republic, or what not. Over the confusion gesticulated Kerensky in attitudes of the finest liberalism. Through it loomed13 various ambiguous adventurers, “strong men,” sham14 strong men, Russian monks15 and Russian Bonapartes. What remained of social order collapsed16. In the closing months of 1917 murder and robbery were common street incidents in Petersburg and Moscow, as common as an automobile17 accident in the streets of London, and less heeded18. On the Reval boat was an American who had formerly19 directed the affairs of the American
73
THE STATUE OF MARX OUTSIDE THE SMOLNY INSTITUTE.
(Headquarters of the Communist Party.)
75Harvester Company in Russia. He had been in Moscow during this phase of complete disorder20. He described hold-ups in open daylight in busy streets, dead bodies lying for hours in the gutter—as a dead kitten might do in a western town—while crowds went about their business along the sidewalk.
Through this fevered and confused country went the representatives of Britain and France, blind to the quality of the immense and tragic21 disaster about them, intent only upon the war, badgering the Russians to keep on fighting and make a fresh offensive against Germany. But when the Germans made a strong thrust towards Petersburg through the Baltic provinces and by sea, the British Admiralty, either through sheer cowardice23 or through Royalist intrigues24, failed to give any effectual help to Russia. Upon this matter the evidence of the late Lord Fisher is plain. And so this unhappy country, mortally sick and, as it were, delirious25, staggered towards a further stage of collapse.
76From end to end of Russia, and in the Russian-speaking community throughout the world, there existed only one sort of people who had common general ideas upon which to work, a common faith and a common will, and that was the Communist party. While all the rest of Russia was either apathetic26 like the peasantry or garrulously27 at sixes and sevens or given over to violence or fear, the Communists believed and were prepared to act. Numerically they were and are a very small part of the Russian population. At the present time not one per cent. of the people in Russia are Communists; the organised party certainly does not number more than 600,000 and has probably not much more than 150,000 active members. Nevertheless, because it was in those terrible days the only organisation28 which gave men a common idea of action, common formul?, and mutual29 confidence, it was able to seize and retain control of the smashed empire. It was and it is the only sort of administrative30 solidarity31 possible in Russia. These ambiguous adventurers who have been and 77are afflicting32 Russia, with the support of the Western Powers, Deniken, Kolchak, Wrangel and the like, stand for no guiding principle and offer no security of any sort upon which men’s confidence can crystallise. They are essentially33 brigands34. The Communist party, however one may criticise35 it, does embody36 an idea and can be relied upon to stand by its idea. So far it is a thing morally higher than anything that has yet come against it. It at once secured the passive support of the peasant mass by permitting them to take land from the estates and by making peace with Germany. It restored order—after a frightful37 lot of shooting—in the great towns. For a time everybody found carrying arms without authority was shot. This action was clumsy and bloody38 but effective. To retain its power this Communist Government organised Extraordinary Commissions, with practically unlimited39 powers, and crushed out all opposition40 by a Red Terror. Much that that Red Terror did was cruel and frightful, it was largely controlled by narrow-minded 78men, and many of its officials were inspired by social hatred41 and the fear of counter-revolution, but if it was fanatical it was honest. Apart from individual atrocities42 it did on the whole kill for a reason and to an end. Its bloodshed was not like the silly aimless butcheries of the Deniken régime, which would not even recognise, I was told, the Bolshevik Red Cross. And to-day the Bolshevik Government sits, I believe, in Moscow as securely established as any Government in Europe, and the streets of the Russian towns are as safe as any streets in Europe.
It not only established itself and restored order, but—thanks largely to the genius of that ex-pacifist Trotsky—it re-created the Russian army as a fighting force. That we must recognise as a very remarkable43 achievement. I saw little of the Russian army myself, it was not what I went to Russia to see, but Mr. Vanderlip, the distinguished44 American financier, whom I found in Moscow engaged in some financial negotiations45 with the Soviet46 Government, had been treated 79to a review of several thousand troops, and was very enthusiastic about their spirit and equipment. My son and I saw a number of drafts going to the front, and also bodies of recruits joining up, and our impression is that the spirit of the men was quite as good as that of similar bodies of British recruits in London in 1917–18.
Now who are these Bolsheviki who have taken such an effectual hold upon Russia? According to the crazier section of the British Press they are the agents of a mysterious racial plot, a secret society, in which Jews, Jesuits, Freemasons, and Germans are all jumbled47 together in the maddest fashion. As a matter of fact, nothing was ever quite less secret than the ideas and aims and methods of the Bolsheviks, nor anything quite less like a secret society than their organization. But in England we cultivate a peculiar49 style of thinking, so impervious50 to any general ideas that it must needs fall back upon the notion of a conspiracy51 to explain the simplest reactions of the human mind. If, for instance, a day labourer in 80Essex makes a fuss because he finds that the price of his children’s boots has risen out of all proportion to the increase in his weekly wages, and declares that he and his fellow-workers are being cheated and underpaid, the editors of The Times and of the Morning Post will trace his resentment52 to the insidious53 propaganda of some mysterious society at K?nigsberg or Pekin. They cannot conceive how otherwise he should get such ideas into his head. Conspiracy mania54 of this kind is so prevalent that I feel constrained55 to apologise for my own immunity56. I find the Bolsheviks very much what they profess57 to be. I find myself obliged to treat them as fairly straightforward58 people. I do not agree with either their views or their methods, but that is another question.
The Bolsheviks are Marxists Socialists59. Marx died in London nearly forty years ago; the propaganda of his views has been going on for over half a century. It has spread over the whole earth and finds in nearly every country a small but enthusiastic following. It is a natural result of world-wide 81economic conditions. Everywhere it expresses the same limited ideas in the same distinctive60 phrasing. It is a cult48, a world-wide international brotherhood61. No one need learn Russian to study the ideas of Bolshevism. The enquirer62 will find them all in the London Plebs or the New York Liberator63 in exactly the same phrases as in the Russian Pravda. They hide nothing. They say everything. And just precisely64 what these Marxists write and say, so they attempt to do.
It will be best if I write about Marx without any hypocritical deference65. I have always regarded him as a Bore of the extremest sort. His vast unfinished work, Das Kapital, a cadence66 of wearisome volumes about such phantom67 unrealities as the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, a book for ever maundering away into tedious secondary discussions, impresses me as a monument of pretentious68 pedantry69. But before I went to Russia on this last occasion I had no active hostility70 to Marx. I avoided his works, and when I encountered Marxists I disposed 82of them by asking them to tell me exactly what people constituted the proletariat. None of them knew. No Marxist knows. In Gorky’s flat I listened with attention while Bokaiev discussed with Shalyapin the fine question of whether in Russia there was a proletariat at all, distinguishable from the peasants. As Bokaiev has been head of the Extraordinary Commission of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat in Petersburg, it was interesting to note the fine difficulties of the argument. The “proletarian” in the Marxist jargon71 is like the “producer” in the jargon of some political economists72, who is supposed to be a creature absolutely distinct and different from the “consumer.” So the proletarian is a figure put into flat opposition to something called capital. I find in large type outside the current number of the Plebs, “The working class and the employing class have nothing in common.” Apply this to a works foreman who is being taken in a train by an engine-driver to see how the house he is having built for him by a building society is getting on. To which of 83these immiscibles does he belong, employer or employed? The stuff is sheer nonsense.
In Russia I must confess my passive objection to Marx has changed to a very active hostility. Wherever we went we encountered busts73, portraits, and statues of Marx. About two-thirds of the face of Marx is beard, a vast solemn woolly uneventful beard that must have made all normal exercise impossible. It is not the sort of beard that happens to a man, it is a beard cultivated, cherished, and thrust patriarchally upon the world. It is exactly like Das Kapital in its inane74 abundance, and the human part of the face looks over it owlishly as if it looked to see how the growth impressed mankind. I found the omnipresent images of that beard more and more irritating. A gnawing75 desire grew upon me to see Karl Marx shaved. Some day, if I am spared, I will take up shears76 and a razor against Das Kapital; I will write The Shaving of Karl Marx.
But Marx is for the Marxists merely an image and a symbol, and it is with the Marxist 84and not with Marx that we are now dealing78. Few Marxists have read much of Das Kapital. The Marxist is very much the same sort of person in all modern communities, and I will confess that by my temperament79 and circumstances I have the very warmest sympathy for him. He adopts Marx as his prophet simply because he believes that Marx wrote of the class war, an implacable war of the employed against the employer, and that he prophesied80 a triumph for the employed person, a dictatorship of the world by the leaders of these liberated81 employed persons (dictatorship of the proletariat), and a Communist millennium82 arising out of that dictatorship. Now this doctrine83 and this prophecy have appealed in every country with extraordinary power to young persons, and particularly to young men of energy and imagination who have found themselves at the outset of life imperfectly educated, ill-equipped, and caught into hopeless wages slavery in our existing economic system. They realise in their own persons the social injustice84, the stupid negligence85, 85the colossal86 incivility of our system; they realise that they are insulted and sacrificed by it; and they devote themselves to break it and emancipate87 themselves from it. No insidious propaganda is needed to make such rebels; it is the faults of a system that half-educates and then enslaves them which have created the Communist movement wherever industrialism has developed. There would have been Marxists if Marx had never lived. When I was a boy of fourteen I was a complete Marxist, long before I had heard the name of Marx. I had been cut off abruptly88 from education, caught in a detestable shop, and I was being broken in to a life of mean and dreary89 toil90. I was worked too hard and for such long hours that all thoughts of self-improvement seemed hopeless. I would have set fire to that place if I had not been convinced it was over-insured. I revived the spirit of those bitter days in a conversation I had with Zorin, one of the leaders of the Commune of the North. He is a young man who has come back from unskilled work in America, a very likable 86human being and a humorous and very popular speaker in the Petersburg Soviet. He and I exchanged experiences, and I found that the thing that rankled91 most in his mind about America was the brutal92 incivility he had encountered when applying for a job as packer in a big dry goods store in New York. We told each other stories of the way our social system wastes and breaks and maddens decent and willing men. Between us was the freemasonry of a common indignation.
It is that indignation of youth and energy, thwarted93 and misused94, it is that and no mere77 economic theorising, which is the living and linking inspiration of the Marxist movement throughout the world. It is not that Marx was profoundly wise, but that our economic system has been stupid, selfish, wasteful95, and anarchistic96. The Communistic organisation has provided for this angry recalcitrance97 certain shibboleths98 and passwords: “Workers of the World unite,” and so forth99. It has suggested to them an idea of a great conspiracy against human happiness 87concocted by a mysterious body of wicked men called capitalists. For in this mentally enfeebled world in which we live to-day conspiracy mania on one side finds its echo on the other, and it is hard to persuade a Marxist that capitalists are in their totality no more than a scrambling100 disorder of mean-spirited and short-sighted men. And the Communist propaganda has knitted all these angry and disinherited spirits together into a world-wide organisation of revolt—and hope—formless though that hope proves to be on examination. It has chosen Marx for its prophet and red for its colour.... And so when the crash came in Russia, when there remained no other solidarity of men who could work together upon any but immediate101 selfish ends, there came flowing back from America and the West to rejoin their comrades a considerable number of keen and enthusiastic young and youngish men, who had in that more bracing102 Western world lost something of the habitual103 impracticability of the Russian and acquired a certain habit of getting things done, who 88all thought in the same phrases and had the courage of the same ideas, and who were all inspired by the dream of a revolution that should bring human life to a new level of justice and happiness. It is these young men who constitute the living force of Bolshevism. Many of them are Jews, because most of the Russian emigrants104 to America were Jews; but few of them have any strong racial Jewish feeling. They are not out for Jewry but for a new world. So far from being in continuation of the Jewish tradition the Bolsheviks have put most of the Zionist leaders in Russia in prison, and they have prescribed the teaching of Hebrew as a “reactionary” language. Several of the most interesting Bolsheviks I met were not Jews at all, but blonde Nordic men. Lenin, the beloved leader of all that is energetic in Russia to-day, has a Tartar type of face and is certainly no Jew.
This Bolshevik Government is at once the most temerarious and the least experienced governing body in the world. In some directions its incompetence105 is amazing. In 89most its ignorance is profound. Of the diabolical106 cunning of “capitalism107” and of the subtleties108 of reaction it is ridiculously suspicious, and sometimes it takes fright and is cruel. But essentially it is honest. It is the most simple-minded Government that exists in the world to-day.
Its simple-mindedness is shown by one question that I was asked again and again during this Russian visit. “When is the social revolution going to happen in England?” Lenin asked me that, Zenovieff, who is the head of the Commune of the North, Zorin, and many others.
Because it is by the Marxist theory all wrong that the social revolution should happen first in Russia. That fact is bothering every intelligent man in the movement. According to the Marxist theory the social revolution should have happened first in the country with the oldest and most highly developed industrialism, with a large, definite, mainly propertyless, mainly wages-earning working class (proletariat). It should have begun in Britain, and spread to France and 90Germany, then should have come America’s turn and so on. Instead they find Communism in power in Russia, which really possesses no specialised labouring class at all, which has worked its factories with peasant labourers who come and go from the villages, and so has scarcely any “proletariat”—to unite with the workers of the world and so forth—at all. Behind the minds of many of these Bolsheviks with whom I talked I saw clearly that there dawns now a chill suspicion of the reality of the case, a realisation that what they have got in Russia is not truly the promised Marxist social revolution at all, that in truth they have not captured a State but got aboard a derelict. I tried to assist the development of this novel and disconcerting discovery. And also I indulged in a little lecture on the absence of a large “class-conscious proletariat” in the Western communities. I explained that in England there were two hundred different classes at least, and that the only “class-conscious proletarians” known to me in the land were a small band of mainly Scotch109 workers kept together by the vigorous leadership of a gentleman named MacManus. Their dearest convictions struggled against my manifest candour. They are clinging desperately110 to the belief that there are hundreds of thousands of convinced Communists in Britain, versed111 in the whole gospel of Marx, a proletarian solidarity, on the eve of seizing power and proclaiming a British Soviet Republic. They hold obstinately112 to that after three years of waiting—but their hold weakens.
92
THE BAKU CONFERENCE SWEARS UNDYING HOSTILITY TO CAPITALISM AND BRITISH IMPERIALISM113.
Zenovieff (by the bell); to the right of him (i.e. on his left) are Radek (spectacles) and Bela Kun (rather foggy).
93
THE BAKU CONFERENCE SWEARS UNDYING HOSTILITY TO CAPITALISM AND BRITISH IMPERIALISM:
The Body of the Hall.
95Among the most amusing things in this queer intellectual situation are the repeated scoldings that come by wireless114 from Moscow to Western Labour because it does not behave as Marx said it would behave. It isn’t red—and it ought to be. It is just yellow.
My conversation with Zenovieff was particularly curious. He is a man with the voice and animation115 of Hilaire Belloc, and a lot of curly coal-black hair. “You have civil war in Ireland,” he said. “Practically,” said I. “Which do you consider 96are the proletarians, the Sinn Feiners or the Ulstermen?” We spent some time while Zenovieff worked like a man with a jigsaw116 puzzle trying to get the Irish situation into the class war formula. That jigsaw puzzle remained unsolved, and we then shifted our attention to Asia. Impatient at the long delay of the Western proletarians to emerge and declare themselves, Zenovieff, assisted by Bela Kun, our Mr. Jack117 Quelch, and a number of other leading Communists, has recently gone on a pilgrimage to Baku to raise the Asiatic proletariat. They went to beat up the class-conscious wages slaves of Persia and Turkestan. They sought out factory workers and slum dwellers118 in the tents of the steppes. They held a congress at Baku, at which they gathered together a quite wonderful accumulation of white, black, brown, and yellow people, Asiatic costumes and astonishing weapons. They had a great assembly in which they swore undying hatred of Capitalism and British imperialism; they had a great procession 97in which I regret to say certain batteries of British guns, which some careless, hasty empire-builder had left behind him, figured; they disinterred and buried again thirteen people whom this British empire-builder seems to have shot without trial, and they burnt Mr. Lloyd George, M. Millerand, and President Wilson in effigy119. I not only saw a five-part film of this remarkable festival when I visited the Petersburg Soviet, but, thanks to Zorin, I have brought the film back with me. It is to be administered with caution and to adults only. There are parts of it that would make Mr. Gwynne of the Morning Post or Mr. Rudyard Kipling scream in their sleep. If so be they ever slept again after seeing it.
I did my best to find out from Zenovieff and Zorin what they thought they were doing in the Baku Conference. And frankly120 I do not think they know. I doubt if they have anything clearer in their minds than a vague idea of hitting back at the British Government through Mesopotamia and India, because it has been hitting them 98through Kolchak, Deniken, Wrangel, and the Poles. It is a counter-offensive almost as clumsy and stupid as the offensives it would counter. It is inconceivable that they can hope for any social solidarity with the miscellaneous discontents their congress assembled. One item “featured” on this Baku film is a dance by a gentleman from the neighbourhood of Baku. He is in fact one of the main features of this remarkable film. He wears a fur-trimmed jacket, high boots, and a high cap, and his dancing is a very rapid and dexterous121 step dancing. He produces two knives and puts them between his teeth, and then two others which he balances perilously122 with the blades dangerously close to his nose on either side of it. Finally he poises123 a fifth knife on his forehead, still stepping it featly to the distinctly Oriental music. He stoops and squats124, arms akimbo, sending his nimble boots flying out and back like the Cossacks in the Russian ballet. He circles slowly as he does this, clapping his hands. He is now 99rolled up in my keeping, ready to dance again when opportunity offers. I tried to find out whether he was a specimen125 Asiatic proletarian or just what he symbolised, but I could get no light on him. But there are yards and yards of film of him. I wish I could have resuscitated126 Karl Marx, just to watch that solemn stare over the beard, regarding him. The film gives no indication of his reception by Mr. Jack Quelch.
I hope I shall not offend Comrade Zorin, for whom I have a real friendship, if I thus confess to him that I cannot take his Baku Conference very seriously. It was an excursion, a pageant127, a Beano. As a meeting of Asiatic proletarians it was preposterous128. But if it was not very much in itself, it was something very important in its revelation of shifting intentions. Its chief significance to me is this, that it shows a new orientation129 of the Bolshevik mind as it is embodied130 in Zenovieff. So long as the Bolsheviki held firmly with unshaken conviction to the Marxist formula they looked westward131, a little surprised 100that the “social revolution” should have begun so far to the east of its indicated centre. Now as they begin to realise that it is not that prescribed social revolution at all but something quite different which has brought them into power, they are naturally enough casting about for a new system of relationships. The ideal figure of the Russian republic is still a huge western “Worker,” with a vast hammer or a sickle132. A time may come, if we maintain the European blockade with sufficient stringency133 and make any industrial recuperation impossible, when that ideal may give place altogether to a nomadic-looking gentleman from Turkestan with a number of knives. We may drive what will remain of Bolshevik Russia to the steppes and the knife. If we help Baron134 Wrangel to pull down the by no means firmly established Government in Moscow, under the delusion135 that thereby136 we shall bring about “representative institutions” and a “limited monarchy,” we may find ourselves very much out in our calculations. Any one 101who destroys the present law and order of Moscow will, I believe, destroy what is left of law and order in Russia. A brigand5 monarchist government will leave a trail of fresh blood across the Russian scene, show what gentlemen can do when they are roused in a tremendous pogrom and White Terror, flourish horribly for a time, break up and vanish. Asia will resume. The simple ancient rhythm of the horseman plundering137 the peasant and the peasant waylaying138 the horseman will creep back across the plains to the Niemen and the Dniester. The cities will become clusters of ruins in the waste; the roads and railroads will rot and rust22; the river traffic will decay....
This Baku Conference has depressed139 Gorky profoundly. He is obsessed140 by a nightmare of Russia going east. Perhaps I have caught a little of his depression.
点击收听单词发音
1 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 incompetent | |
adj.无能力的,不能胜任的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 degenerated | |
衰退,堕落,退化( degenerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 brigand | |
n.土匪,强盗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 brigandage | |
n.抢劫;盗窃;土匪;强盗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 subsisted | |
v.(靠很少的钱或食物)维持生活,生存下去( subsist的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 scramble | |
v.爬行,攀爬,杂乱蔓延,碎片,片段,废料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 clamorous | |
adj.吵闹的,喧哗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 loomed | |
v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的过去式和过去分词 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 sham | |
n./adj.假冒(的),虚伪(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 monks | |
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 collapsed | |
adj.倒塌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 automobile | |
n.汽车,机动车 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 heeded | |
v.听某人的劝告,听从( heed的过去式和过去分词 );变平,使(某物)变平( flatten的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 tragic | |
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 rust | |
n.锈;v.生锈;(脑子)衰退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 cowardice | |
n.胆小,怯懦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 intrigues | |
n.密谋策划( intrigue的名词复数 );神秘气氛;引人入胜的复杂情节v.搞阴谋诡计( intrigue的第三人称单数 );激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 delirious | |
adj.不省人事的,神智昏迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 apathetic | |
adj.冷漠的,无动于衷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 garrulously | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 solidarity | |
n.团结;休戚相关 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 afflicting | |
痛苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 brigands | |
n.土匪,强盗( brigand的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 criticise | |
v.批评,评论;非难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 embody | |
vt.具体表达,使具体化;包含,收录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 bloody | |
adj.非常的的;流血的;残忍的;adv.很;vt.血染 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 atrocities | |
n.邪恶,暴行( atrocity的名词复数 );滔天大罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 jumbled | |
adj.混乱的;杂乱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 cult | |
n.异教,邪教;时尚,狂热的崇拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 impervious | |
adj.不能渗透的,不能穿过的,不易伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 resentment | |
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 insidious | |
adj.阴险的,隐匿的,暗中为害的,(疾病)不知不觉之间加剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 mania | |
n.疯狂;躁狂症,狂热,癖好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 immunity | |
n.优惠;免除;豁免,豁免权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 profess | |
v.声称,冒称,以...为业,正式接受入教,表明信仰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 straightforward | |
adj.正直的,坦率的;易懂的,简单的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 socialists | |
社会主义者( socialist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 distinctive | |
adj.特别的,有特色的,与众不同的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 brotherhood | |
n.兄弟般的关系,手中情谊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 enquirer | |
寻问者,追究者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 liberator | |
解放者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 deference | |
n.尊重,顺从;敬意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 cadence | |
n.(说话声调的)抑扬顿挫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 phantom | |
n.幻影,虚位,幽灵;adj.错觉的,幻影的,幽灵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 pretentious | |
adj.自命不凡的,自负的,炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 pedantry | |
n.迂腐,卖弄学问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 hostility | |
n.敌对,敌意;抵制[pl.]交战,战争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 jargon | |
n.术语,行话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 busts | |
半身雕塑像( bust的名词复数 ); 妇女的胸部; 胸围; 突击搜捕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 inane | |
adj.空虚的,愚蠢的,空洞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 gnawing | |
a.痛苦的,折磨人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 shears | |
n.大剪刀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 prophesied | |
v.预告,预言( prophesy的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 liberated | |
a.无拘束的,放纵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 millennium | |
n.一千年,千禧年;太平盛世 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 negligence | |
n.疏忽,玩忽,粗心大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 colossal | |
adj.异常的,庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 emancipate | |
v.解放,解除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 abruptly | |
adv.突然地,出其不意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 dreary | |
adj.令人沮丧的,沉闷的,单调乏味的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 toil | |
vi.辛劳工作,艰难地行动;n.苦工,难事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 rankled | |
v.(使)痛苦不已,(使)怨恨不已( rankle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 thwarted | |
阻挠( thwart的过去式和过去分词 ); 使受挫折; 挫败; 横过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 misused | |
v.使用…不当( misuse的过去式和过去分词 );把…派作不正当的用途;虐待;滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 wasteful | |
adj.(造成)浪费的,挥霍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 anarchistic | |
无政府主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 recalcitrance | |
n.固执,顽抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 shibboleths | |
n.(党派、集团等的)准则( shibboleth的名词复数 );教条;用语;行话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 scrambling | |
v.快速爬行( scramble的现在分词 );攀登;争夺;(军事飞机)紧急起飞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 bracing | |
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 habitual | |
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 emigrants | |
n.(从本国移往他国的)移民( emigrant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 incompetence | |
n.不胜任,不称职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 diabolical | |
adj.恶魔似的,凶暴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 capitalism | |
n.资本主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 subtleties | |
细微( subtlety的名词复数 ); 精细; 巧妙; 细微的差别等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 scotch | |
n.伤口,刻痕;苏格兰威士忌酒;v.粉碎,消灭,阻止;adj.苏格兰(人)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 desperately | |
adv.极度渴望地,绝望地,孤注一掷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 versed | |
adj. 精通,熟练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 obstinately | |
ad.固执地,顽固地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 imperialism | |
n.帝国主义,帝国主义政策 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 wireless | |
adj.无线的;n.无线电 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 animation | |
n.活泼,兴奋,卡通片/动画片的制作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 jigsaw | |
n.缕花锯,竖锯,拼图游戏;vt.用竖锯锯,使互相交错搭接 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 dwellers | |
n.居民,居住者( dweller的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 effigy | |
n.肖像 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 dexterous | |
adj.灵敏的;灵巧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 perilously | |
adv.充满危险地,危机四伏地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 poises | |
使平衡( poise的第三人称单数 ); 保持(某种姿势); 抓紧; 使稳定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 squats | |
n.蹲坐,蹲姿( squat的名词复数 );被擅自占用的建筑物v.像动物一样蹲下( squat的第三人称单数 );非法擅自占用(土地或房屋);为获得其所有权;而占用某片公共用地。 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 specimen | |
n.样本,标本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 resuscitated | |
v.使(某人或某物)恢复知觉,苏醒( resuscitate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 pageant | |
n.壮观的游行;露天历史剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 preposterous | |
adj.荒谬的,可笑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 orientation | |
n.方向,目标;熟悉,适应,情况介绍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 westward | |
n.西方,西部;adj.西方的,向西的;adv.向西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 sickle | |
n.镰刀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 stringency | |
n.严格,紧迫,说服力;严格性;强度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 baron | |
n.男爵;(商业界等)巨头,大王 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 delusion | |
n.谬见,欺骗,幻觉,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 plundering | |
掠夺,抢劫( plunder的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 waylaying | |
v.拦截,拦路( waylay的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 depressed | |
adj.沮丧的,抑郁的,不景气的,萧条的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 obsessed | |
adj.心神不宁的,鬼迷心窍的,沉迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |