Now it is the great mark of our modernity that people are always proposing substitutes for these old things; and these substitutes always answer one purpose where the old thing answered ten. The modern man will wave a cigarette instead of a stick; he will cut his pencil with a little screwing pencil-sharpener instead of a knife; and he will even boldly offer to be warmed by hot water pipes instead of a fire. I have my doubts about pencil-sharpeners even for sharpening pencils; and about hot water pipes even for heat. But when we think of all those other requirements that these institutions answered, there opens before us the whole horrible harlequinade of our civilization. We see as in a vision a world where a man tries to cut his throat with a pencil-sharpener; where a man must learn single-stick with a cigarette; where a man must try to toast muffins at electric lamps, and see red and golden castles in the surface of hot water pipes.
The principle of which I speak can be seen everywhere in a comparison between the ancient and universal things and the modern and specialist things. The object of a theodolite is to lie level; the object of a stick is to swing loose at any angle; to whirl like the very wheel of liberty. The object of a lancet is to lance; when used for slashing9, gashing10, ripping, lopping off heads and limbs, it is a disappointing instrument. The object of an electric light is merely to light (a despicable modesty); and the object of an asbestos stove... I wonder what is the object of an asbestos stove? If a man found a coil of rope in a desert he could at least think of all the things that can be done with a coil of rope; and some of them might even be practical. He could tow a boat or lasso a horse. He could play cat’s-cradle, or pick oakum. He could construct a rope-ladder for an eloping heiress, or cord her boxes for a travelling maiden12 aunt. He could learn to tie a bow, or he could hang himself. Far otherwise with the unfortunate traveller who should find a telephone in the desert. You can telephone with a telephone; you cannot do anything else with it. And though this is one of the wildest joys of life, it falls by one degree from its full delirium13 when there is nobody to answer you. The contention14 is, in brief, that you must pull up a hundred roots, and not one, before you uproot15 any of these hoary16 and simple expedients17. It is only with great difficulty that a modern scientific sociologist18 can be got to see that any old method has a leg to stand on. But almost every old method has four or five legs to stand on. Almost all the old institutions are quadrupeds; and some of them are centipedes.
Consider these cases, old and new, and you will observe the operation of a general tendency. Everywhere there was one big thing that served six purposes; everywhere now there are six small things; or, rather (and there is the trouble), there are just five and a half. Nevertheless, we will not say that this separation and specialism is entirely19 useless or inexcusable. I have often thanked God for the telephone; I may any day thank God for the lancet; and there is none of these brilliant and narrow inventions (except, of course, the asbestos stove) which might not be at some moment necessary and lovely. But I do not think the most austere20 upholder of specialism will deny that there is in these old, many-sided institutions an element of unity21 and universality which may well be preserved in its due proportion and place. Spiritually, at least, it will be admitted that some all-round balance is needed to equalize the extravagance of experts. It would not be difficult to carry the parable22 of the knife and stick into higher regions. Religion, the immortal23 maiden, has been a maid-of-all-work as well as a servant of mankind. She provided men at once with the theoretic laws of an unalterable cosmos24 and also with the practical rules of the rapid and thrilling game of morality. She taught logic25 to the student and told fairy tales to the children; it was her business to confront the nameless gods whose fears are on all flesh, and also to see the streets were spotted26 with silver and scarlet27, that there was a day for wearing ribbons or an hour for ringing bells. The large uses of religion have been broken up into lesser28 specialities, just as the uses of the hearth have been broken up into hot water pipes and electric bulbs. The romance of ritual and colored emblem29 has been taken over by that narrowest of all trades, modern art (the sort called art for art’s sake), and men are in modern practice informed that they may use all symbols so long as they mean nothing by them. The romance of conscience has been dried up into the science of ethics30; which may well be called decency31 for decency’s sake, decency unborn of cosmic energies and barren of artistic32 flower. The cry to the dim gods, cut off from ethics and cosmology, has become mere11 Psychical33 Research. Everything has been sundered35 from everything else, and everything has grown cold. Soon we shall hear of specialists dividing the tune36 from the words of a song, on the ground that they spoil each other; and I did once meet a man who openly advocated the separation of almonds and raisins37. This world is all one wild divorce court; nevertheless, there are many who still hear in their souls the thunder of authority of human habit; those whom Man hath joined let no man sunder34.
This book must avoid religion, but there must (I say) be many, religious and irreligious, who will concede that this power of answering many purposes was a sort of strength which should not wholly die out of our lives. As a part of personal character, even the moderns will agree that many-sidedness is a merit and a merit that may easily be overlooked. This balance and universality has been the vision of many groups of men in many ages. It was the Liberal Education of Aristotle; the jack-of-all-trades artistry of Leonardo da Vinci and his friends; the august amateurishness38 of the Cavalier Person of Quality like Sir William Temple or the great Earl of Dorset. It has appeared in literature in our time in the most erratic39 and opposite shapes, set to almost inaudible music by Walter Pater and enunciated40 through a foghorn41 by Walt Whitman. But the great mass of men have always been unable to achieve this literal universality, because of the nature of their work in the world. Not, let it be noted42, because of the existence of their work. Leonardo da Vinci must have worked pretty hard; on the other hand, many a government office clerk, village constable43 or elusive44 plumber45 may do (to all human appearance) no work at all, and yet show no signs of the Aristotelian universalism. What makes it difficult for the average man to be a universalist is that the average man has to be a specialist; he has not only to learn one trade, but to learn it so well as to uphold him in a more or less ruthless society. This is generally true of males from the first hunter to the last electrical engineer; each has not merely to act, but to excel. Nimrod has not only to be a mighty46 hunter before the Lord, but also a mighty hunter before the other hunters. The electrical engineer has to be a very electrical engineer, or he is outstripped47 by engineers yet more electrical. Those very miracles of the human mind on which the modern world prides itself, and rightly in the main, would be impossible without a certain concentration which disturbs the pure balance of reason more than does religious bigotry48. No creed49 can be so limiting as that awful adjuration50 that the cobbler must not go beyond his last. So the largest and wildest shots of our world are but in one direction and with a defined trajectory51: the gunner cannot go beyond his shot, and his shot so often falls short; the astronomer52 cannot go beyond his telescope and his telescope goes such a little way. All these are like men who have stood on the high peak of a mountain and seen the horizon like a single ring and who then descend53 down different paths towards different towns, traveling slow or fast. It is right; there must be people traveling to different towns; there must be specialists; but shall no one behold54 the horizon? Shall all mankind be specialist surgeons or peculiar55 plumbers56; shall all humanity be monomaniac? Tradition has decided57 that only half of humanity shall be monomaniac. It has decided that in every home there shall be a tradesman and a Jack-of-all-trades. But it has also decided, among other things, that the Jack-of-all-trades shall be a Jill-of-all-trades. It has decided, rightly or wrongly, that this specialism and this universalism shall be divided between the sexes. Cleverness shall be left for men and wisdom for women. For cleverness kills wisdom; that is one of the few sad and certain things.
But for women this ideal of comprehensive capacity (or common-sense) must long ago have been washed away. It must have melted in the frightful58 furnaces of ambition and eager technicality. A man must be partly a one-idead man, because he is a one-weaponed man—and he is flung naked into the fight. The world’s demand comes to him direct; to his wife indirectly59. In short, he must (as the books on Success say) give “his best”; and what a small part of a man “his best” is! His second and third best are often much better. If he is the first violin he must fiddle60 for life; he must not remember that he is a fine fourth bagpipe61, a fair fifteenth billiard-cue, a foil, a fountain pen, a hand at whist, a gun, and an image of God.
点击收听单词发音
1 hearth | |
n.壁炉炉床,壁炉地面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 tottering | |
adj.蹒跚的,动摇的v.走得或动得不稳( totter的现在分词 );踉跄;蹒跚;摇摇欲坠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pedants | |
n.卖弄学问的人,学究,书呆子( pedant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 myriad | |
adj.无数的;n.无数,极大数量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 crutch | |
n.T字形拐杖;支持,依靠,精神支柱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 elongated | |
v.延长,加长( elongate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 chestnuts | |
n.栗子( chestnut的名词复数 );栗色;栗树;栗色马 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 checkered | |
adj.有方格图案的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 slashing | |
adj.尖锐的;苛刻的;鲜明的;乱砍的v.挥砍( slash的现在分词 );鞭打;割破;削减 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 gashing | |
v.划伤,割破( gash的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 maiden | |
n.少女,处女;adj.未婚的,纯洁的,无经验的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 delirium | |
n. 神智昏迷,说胡话;极度兴奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 contention | |
n.争论,争辩,论战;论点,主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 uproot | |
v.连根拔起,拔除;根除,灭绝;赶出家园,被迫移开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 hoary | |
adj.古老的;鬓发斑白的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 expedients | |
n.应急有效的,权宜之计的( expedient的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 sociologist | |
n.研究社会学的人,社会学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 austere | |
adj.艰苦的;朴素的,朴实无华的;严峻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 unity | |
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 parable | |
n.寓言,比喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 cosmos | |
n.宇宙;秩序,和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 logic | |
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 spotted | |
adj.有斑点的,斑纹的,弄污了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 scarlet | |
n.深红色,绯红色,红衣;adj.绯红色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 emblem | |
n.象征,标志;徽章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 decency | |
n.体面,得体,合宜,正派,庄重 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 artistic | |
adj.艺术(家)的,美术(家)的;善于艺术创作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 psychical | |
adj.有关特异功能现象的;有关特异功能官能的;灵魂的;心灵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 sunder | |
v.分开;隔离;n.分离,分开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 sundered | |
v.隔开,分开( sunder的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 tune | |
n.调子;和谐,协调;v.调音,调节,调整 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 raisins | |
n.葡萄干( raisin的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 amateurishness | |
n.amateurish(业余的)的变形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 erratic | |
adj.古怪的,反复无常的,不稳定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 enunciated | |
v.(清晰地)发音( enunciate的过去式和过去分词 );确切地说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 foghorn | |
n..雾号(浓雾信号) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 constable | |
n.(英国)警察,警官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 elusive | |
adj.难以表达(捉摸)的;令人困惑的;逃避的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 plumber | |
n.(装修水管的)管子工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 outstripped | |
v.做得比…更好,(在赛跑等中)超过( outstrip的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 bigotry | |
n.偏见,偏执,持偏见的行为[态度]等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 creed | |
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 adjuration | |
n.祈求,命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 trajectory | |
n.弹道,轨道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 astronomer | |
n.天文学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 descend | |
vt./vi.传下来,下来,下降 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 behold | |
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 plumbers | |
n.管子工,水暖工( plumber的名词复数 );[美][口](防止泄密的)堵漏人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 fiddle | |
n.小提琴;vi.拉提琴;不停拨弄,乱动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 bagpipe | |
n.风笛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |