And then, suddenly, the seventeenth century gave birth to two English artists of genius. It produced Inigo Jones and, a little later, Wren7. Wren died, at the age of more than ninety, in the spring of 1723. We are celebrating to-day his bi-centenary—celebrating it not merely by antiquarian talk and scholarly appreciations8 of his style but also (the signs are not wanting) in a more concrete and living way: by taking a renewed interest in the art of which he was so great a master and by reverting9 in our practice to that fine tradition which he, with his predecessor10, Inigo, inaugurated.
An anniversary celebration is an act of what Wordsworth would have called “natural piety”; an act by which past is linked with present and of the vague, interminable series of the days a single comprehensible and logical unity11 is created in our minds. At the coming of the centenaries we like to remember the great men of the past, not so much by way of historical exercise, but that we may see precisely12 where, in relation to their achievement, we stand at the present time, that we may appraise13 the life still left in their spirit and apply to ourselves the moral of their example. I have no intention in this 169article of giving a biography of Wren, a list of his works, or a technical account of his style and methods. I propose to do no more than describe, in the most general terms, the nature of his achievement and its significance to ourselves.
Wren was a good architect. But since it is important to know precisely what we are talking about, let us begin by asking ourselves what good architecture is. Descending14 with majesty15 from his private Sinai, Mr. Ruskin dictated16 to a whole generation of Englishmen the ?sthetic Law. On monolithic17 tables that were the Stones of Venice he wrote the great truths that had been revealed to him. Here is one of them:
It is to be generally observed that the proportions of buildings have nothing to do with the style or general merit of their architecture. An architect trained in the worst schools and utterly18 devoid19 of all meaning or purpose in his work, may yet have such a natural gift of massing and grouping as will render his structure effective when seen at a distance.
Now it is to be generally observed, as he himself would say, that in all matters connected with art, Ruskin is to be interpreted as we interpret dreams—that is to say, as signifying precisely the opposite of what he says. Thus, when we find him saying that 170good architecture has nothing to do with proportion or the judicious20 disposition21 of masses and that the general effect counts for nothing at all, we may take it as more or less definitely proven that good architecture is, in fact, almost entirely22 a matter of proportion and massing, and that the general effect of the whole work counts for nearly everything. Interpreted according to this simple oneirocritical method, Ruskin’s pontifical23 pronouncement may be taken as explaining briefly24 and clearly the secrets of good architecture. That is why I have chosen this quotation25 to be the text of my discourse26 on Wren.
For the qualities which most obviously distinguish Wren’s work are precisely those which Ruskin so contemptuously disparages27 and which we, by our process of interpretation28, have singled out as the essentially29 architectural qualities. In all that Wren designed—I am speaking of the works of his maturity30; for at the beginning of his career he was still an unpractised amateur, and at the end, though still on occasion wonderfully successful, a very old man—we see a faultless proportion, a felicitous31 massing and contrasting of forms. He conceived his buildings as three-dimensional designs which should be seen, from every point of view, as 171harmoniously proportioned wholes. (With regard to the exteriors33 this, of course, is true only of those buildings which can be seen from all sides. Like all true architects, Wren preferred to build in positions where his work could be appreciated three-dimensionally. But he was also a wonderful maker34 of fa?ades; witness his Middle Temple gateway35 and his houses in King’s Bench Walk.) He possessed36 in the highest degree that instinctive37 sense of proportion and scale which enabled him to embody38 his conception in brick and stone. In his great masterpiece of St. Paul’s every part of the building, seen from within or without, seems to stand in a certain satisfying and harmonious32 relation to every other part. The same is true even of the smallest works belonging to the period of Wren’s maturity. On its smaller scale and different plane, such a building as Rochester Guildhall is as beautiful, because as harmonious in the relation of all its parts, as St. Paul’s.
Of Wren’s other purely39 architectural qualities I shall speak but briefly. He was, to begin with, an engineer of inexhaustible resource; one who could always be relied upon to find the best possible solution to any problem, from blowing up the ruins of old St. Paul’s to providing the new with a dome40 that 172should be at once beautiful and thoroughly41 safe. As a designer he exhibited the same practical ingenuity42. No architect has known how to make so much of a difficult site and cheap materials. The man who built the City churches was a practical genius of no common order. He was also an artist of profoundly original mind. This originality43 reveals itself in the way in which he combines the accepted features of classical Renaissance architecture into new designs that were entirely English and his own. The steeples of his City churches provide us with an obvious example of this originality. His domestic architecture—that wonderful application of classical principles to the best in the native tradition—is another.
But Wren’s most characteristic quality—the quality which gives to his work, over and above its pure beauty, its own peculiar44 character and charm—is a quality rather moral than ?sthetic. Of Chelsea Hospital, Carlyle once remarked that it was “obviously the work of a gentleman.” The words are illuminating45. Everything that Wren did was the work of a gentleman; that is the secret of its peculiar character. For Wren was a great gentleman: one who valued dignity and restraint and who, respecting himself, respected also humanity; one who desired 173that men and women should live with the dignity, even the grandeur46, befitting their proud human title; one who despised meanness and oddity as much as vulgar ostentation47; one who admired reason and order, who distrusted all extravagance and excess. A gentleman, the finished product of an old and ordered civilization.
Wren, the restrained and dignified48 gentleman, stands out most clearly when we compare him with his Italian contemporaries. The baroque artists of the seventeenth century were interested above everything in the new, the startling, the astonishing; they strained after impossible grandeurs, unheard-of violences. The architectural ideals of which they dreamed were more suitable for embodiment in theatrical49 cardboard than in stone. And indeed, the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century was the golden age of scene-painting in Italy. The artists who painted the settings for the elder Scarlatti’s operas, the later Bibienas and Piranesis, came nearer to reaching the wild Italian ideal than ever mere architects like Borromini or Bernini, their imaginations cramped50 by the stubbornness of stone and the unsleeping activities of gravitations, could hope to do.
How vastly different is the baroque theatricality51 from Wren’s sober restraint! Wren 174was a master of the grand style; but he never dreamed of building for effect alone. He was never theatrical or showy, never pretentious52 or vulgar. St. Paul’s is a monument of temperance and chastity. His great palace at Hampton Court is no gaudy53 stage-setting for the farce54 of absolute monarchy55. It is a country gentleman’s house—more spacious56, of course, and with statelier rooms and more impressive vistas—but still a house meant to be lived in by some one who was a man as well as a king. But if his palaces might have housed, without the least incongruity57, a well-bred gentleman, conversely his common houses were always dignified enough, however small, to be palaces in miniature and the homes of kings.
In the course of the two hundred years which have elapsed since his death, Wren’s successors have often departed, with melancholy58 results, from the tradition of which he was the founder59. They have forgotten, in their architecture, the art of being gentlemen. Infected by a touch of the baroque folie de grandeur, the architects of the eighteenth century built houses in imitation of Versailles and Caserta—huge stage houses, all for show and magnificence and all but impossible to live in.
The architects of the nineteenth century 175sinned in a diametrically opposite way—towards meanness and a negation60 of art. Senselessly preoccupied61 with details, they created the nightmare architecture of “features.” The sham62 Gothic of early Victorian times yielded at the end of the century to the nauseous affectation of “sham-peasantry.” Big houses were built with all the irregularity and more than the “quaintness” of cottages; suburban63 villas64 took the form of machine-made imitations of the Tudor peasant’s hut. To all intents and purposes architecture ceased to exist; Ruskin had triumphed.
To-day, however, there are signs that architecture is coming back to that sane65 and dignified tradition of which Wren was the great exponent66. Architects are building houses for gentlemen to live in. Let us hope that they will continue to do so. There may be sublimer67 types of men than the gentleman: there are saints, for example, and the great enthusiasts68 whose thoughts and actions move the world. But for practical purposes and in a civilized69, orderly society, the gentleman remains, after all, the ideal man. The most profound religious emotions have been expressed in Gothic architecture. Human ambitions and aspirations70 have been most colossally71 reflected by the Romans and the 176Italians of the baroque. But it is in England that the golden mean of reasonableness and decency—the practical philosophy of the civilized man—has received its most elegant and dignified expression. The old gentleman who died two hundred years ago preached on the subject of civilization a number of sermons in stone. St. Paul’s and Greenwich, Trinity Library and Hampton Court, Chelsea, Kilmainham, Blackheath and Rochester, St. Stephen’s, Wallbrook and St. Mary Ab-church, Kensington orangery and Middle Temple gateway—these are the titles of a few of them. They have much, if we will but study them, to teach us.
点击收听单词发音
1 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 renaissance | |
n.复活,复兴,文艺复兴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 manifestations | |
n.表示,显示(manifestation的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 measles | |
n.麻疹,风疹,包虫病,痧子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 bout | |
n.侵袭,发作;一次(阵,回);拳击等比赛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 wren | |
n.鹪鹩;英国皇家海军女子服务队成员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 appreciations | |
n.欣赏( appreciation的名词复数 );感激;评定;(尤指土地或财产的)增值 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 reverting | |
恢复( revert的现在分词 ); 重提; 回到…上; 归还 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 predecessor | |
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 unity | |
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 appraise | |
v.估价,评价,鉴定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 descending | |
n. 下行 adj. 下降的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 majesty | |
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 dictated | |
v.大声讲或读( dictate的过去式和过去分词 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 monolithic | |
adj.似独块巨石的;整体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 utterly | |
adv.完全地,绝对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 devoid | |
adj.全无的,缺乏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 judicious | |
adj.明智的,明断的,能作出明智决定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 pontifical | |
adj.自以为是的,武断的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 quotation | |
n.引文,引语,语录;报价,牌价,行情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 disparages | |
v.轻视( disparage的第三人称单数 );贬低;批评;非难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 maturity | |
n.成熟;完成;(支票、债券等)到期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 felicitous | |
adj.恰当的,巧妙的;n.恰当,贴切 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 harmonious | |
adj.和睦的,调和的,和谐的,协调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 exteriors | |
n.外面( exterior的名词复数 );外貌;户外景色图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 maker | |
n.制造者,制造商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 gateway | |
n.大门口,出入口,途径,方法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 instinctive | |
adj.(出于)本能的;直觉的;(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 embody | |
vt.具体表达,使具体化;包含,收录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 dome | |
n.圆屋顶,拱顶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 ingenuity | |
n.别出心裁;善于发明创造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 originality | |
n.创造力,独创性;新颖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 illuminating | |
a.富于启发性的,有助阐明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 grandeur | |
n.伟大,崇高,宏伟,庄严,豪华 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 ostentation | |
n.夸耀,卖弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 dignified | |
a.可敬的,高贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 theatrical | |
adj.剧场的,演戏的;做戏似的,做作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 cramped | |
a.狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 theatricality | |
n.戏剧风格,不自然 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 pretentious | |
adj.自命不凡的,自负的,炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 gaudy | |
adj.华而不实的;俗丽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 farce | |
n.闹剧,笑剧,滑稽戏;胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 spacious | |
adj.广阔的,宽敞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 incongruity | |
n.不协调,不一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 melancholy | |
n.忧郁,愁思;adj.令人感伤(沮丧)的,忧郁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 negation | |
n.否定;否认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 preoccupied | |
adj.全神贯注的,入神的;被抢先占有的;心事重重的v.占据(某人)思想,使对…全神贯注,使专心于( preoccupy的过去式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 sham | |
n./adj.假冒(的),虚伪(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 suburban | |
adj.城郊的,在郊区的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 villas | |
别墅,公馆( villa的名词复数 ); (城郊)住宅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 sane | |
adj.心智健全的,神志清醒的,明智的,稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 exponent | |
n.倡导者,拥护者;代表人物;指数,幂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 sublimer | |
使高尚者,纯化器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 enthusiasts | |
n.热心人,热衷者( enthusiast的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 civilized | |
a.有教养的,文雅的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 aspirations | |
强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 ); 志向; 发送气音; 发 h 音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 colossally | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |