Among the dead, I make Sir Richard Burton meet and talk with Herbert Spencer, and I always call this conversation The Man and the Mummy. It is strange, but we have not, so far as I am aware, any record of Burton’s rich and provocative1 conversation, though I have been assured by men who knew him well that his talk was the best they had heard. Sir Richard Burton is one of the men whom I most wish to meet, and perhaps when my happy sojourn2 on this planet comes to a close, I shall be allowed to serve him in some humble3 capacity. To me he has always seemed to belong to Elizabethan times, and I think that he must often have cursed at Fate for placing him in the middle of a century that could not fully4 understand or appreciate him.
In our own days we have many young men of a spirit akin5 to that of Burton, though not one of them may possess a tithe6 of his genius or of his colossal7 intellect. I refer, of course, to our numerous soldier-poets—gallant young men of thought and action, of quick and generous sympathy, of noble aspiration8. Most of you who read what I am now writing must know at least one man belonging to this type, for there are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of them—men who, but for the war, would probably never have written a line of poetry, but whose souls have been stirred and whose hearts have been fired by the grandest emotion that can urge mankind to self-sacrifice: I mean the never-dying emotion of patriotism—that emotion at which the sexless sneer9, which the “cosmopolitan” regards with amusement, and for which men of imagination and grit10 gladly die.
One soldier of this type I knew intimately, and I would gladly know many of those others who have thrilled us with their poems. Let me describe my friend to you. He is no longer young: his precise age is thirty-five: but 270he was among those who, early in August, 1914, after first putting his small affairs in order, enlisted11 in Lord Kitchener’s Army. He made no fuss about it, and told none but his most intimate friends what he had done. I met him a few months after he had joined up; he was then a Corporal, and seemed to me the happiest man I had met for many a day. He told me that he had begun to write “seriously,” for hitherto his scribbling12 had been of a cursory13 and trivial nature. But he showed me none of his work, and it was not until he had been in France some little time that his verses began to appear in one or two reviews. Having been granted a commission, he quickly rose to the rank of Captain. He was mentioned in dispatches twice and, having led a particularly successful bombing raid on the enemy’s trenches14, was awarded the Military Cross.
There is, I know, nothing very unusual in this bare record as I have set it down; the unusual, indeed extraordinary, nature of this case is that before the war my friend had been a reserved, unadventurous but very capable bank clerk, quite undistinguished and apparently16 without ambition. But hidden fires must from his youth have been smouldering in his heart, and it required the war’s disturbance17 and excitement to blow these ashes into flame, and the war’s opportunity was needed to disclose of what fine material he was made. I flatter myself that I had always known his nature was fine and distinguished15, for though he was a bank clerk one would never have guessed it from his conversation and demeanour. I also know that, generations ago, his forbears played a by-no-means ignoble18 part in our country’s history, and for that reason alone I felt that, though concealed19, there were imagination and aspiration abiding20 in his soul.
. . . . . . . .
One of my friends, Anna Wickham, knows D. H. Lawrence very well, and one day I asked her if she 271would arrange for me to meet him at her house. But she brushed aside the suggestion with the few words that she was not particularly interested in Lawrence and that my time might be wasted if spent with him. Such a suggestion amazed, and still amazes me, and I cannot but think that Anna Wickham had never troubled to read any of D. H. Lawrence’s writings, for it often happens among literary people that close friends do not look at each other’s work.
To me D. H. Lawrence is perhaps the most peculiarly original English writer living. In his poems he is so egoistic as almost to seem like an egomaniac, and in two or three of his novels he is obsessed21 and overwhelmed by the passion of sex. Yet in Sons and Lovers, and in that wonderful first book of his called, I think, The Red Peacock, he gets clean away from himself, and is as objective as all great creative artists are and should be. Every writer must, of course, portray22 life in terms of himself, but only small men continually thrust themselves and themselves only on to an embarrassed public. But Lawrence has an insatiable curiosity about himself, and it seems at times as though he is not anxious to discover or uncover life, but to penetrate23 to the deeps of his own nature and shout out at the top of his voice what he has found there. In such egoism, there is, of course, strength as well as weakness, and the very fault, so grave and so calamitous24, that bars him from achieving great work is, nevertheless, an attraction to those who are much intrigued25 by psychology26.
There are, are there not? two kinds of imaginative literature: the kind we read without more than a passing thought for the man or woman who has written it; and the kind we read primarily because we are enormously interested in the personality and temperament27 of the man or woman from whom that literature comes. In removing himself to Italy instead of throwing himself heart and soul into the ugly but extraordinary life that these years are 272giving us, D. H. Lawrence is, I believe, evading28 his destiny and is thereby29 weakening the gifts and tampering30 with the intellect of a man whose name should stand near the head of all contemporary writers.
If Mr Lawrence should by chance read these pages, he will acquit31 me of impertinence if he remembers that he has taken the public into his confidence, and that he must expect the public to make some comment upon what he, uninvited, has told us.

点击
收听单词发音

1
provocative
![]() |
|
adj.挑衅的,煽动的,刺激的,挑逗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
sojourn
![]() |
|
v./n.旅居,寄居;逗留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
humble
![]() |
|
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
akin
![]() |
|
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
tithe
![]() |
|
n.十分之一税;v.课什一税,缴什一税 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
colossal
![]() |
|
adj.异常的,庞大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
aspiration
![]() |
|
n.志向,志趣抱负;渴望;(语)送气音;吸出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
sneer
![]() |
|
v.轻蔑;嘲笑;n.嘲笑,讥讽的言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
grit
![]() |
|
n.沙粒,决心,勇气;v.下定决心,咬紧牙关 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
enlisted
![]() |
|
adj.应募入伍的v.(使)入伍, (使)参军( enlist的过去式和过去分词 );获得(帮助或支持) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
scribbling
![]() |
|
n.乱涂[写]胡[乱]写的文章[作品]v.潦草的书写( scribble的现在分词 );乱画;草草地写;匆匆记下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
cursory
![]() |
|
adj.粗略的;草率的;匆促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
trenches
![]() |
|
深沟,地沟( trench的名词复数 ); 战壕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
distinguished
![]() |
|
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
apparently
![]() |
|
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
disturbance
![]() |
|
n.动乱,骚动;打扰,干扰;(身心)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
ignoble
![]() |
|
adj.不光彩的,卑鄙的;可耻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
concealed
![]() |
|
a.隐藏的,隐蔽的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
abiding
![]() |
|
adj.永久的,持久的,不变的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
obsessed
![]() |
|
adj.心神不宁的,鬼迷心窍的,沉迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
portray
![]() |
|
v.描写,描述;画(人物、景象等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
penetrate
![]() |
|
v.透(渗)入;刺入,刺穿;洞察,了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
calamitous
![]() |
|
adj.灾难的,悲惨的;多灾多难;惨重 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
intrigued
![]() |
|
adj.好奇的,被迷住了的v.搞阴谋诡计(intrigue的过去式);激起…的兴趣或好奇心;“intrigue”的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
psychology
![]() |
|
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
temperament
![]() |
|
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
evading
![]() |
|
逃避( evade的现在分词 ); 避开; 回避; 想不出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
thereby
![]() |
|
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
tampering
![]() |
|
v.窜改( tamper的现在分词 );篡改;(用不正当手段)影响;瞎摆弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
acquit
![]() |
|
vt.宣判无罪;(oneself)使(自己)表现出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |